Teaching Experience
Not required.
Field Experience
Capstone Plan
A capstone project is the final requirement to complete the degree. The capstone project will consist of a hypothetical urban development project with students working in teams to analyze the context and develop a real estate development proposal. Students will be divided into groups in the first quarter to analyze various aspects of the project’s urban development context. For example, different teams might focus on site and spatial analysis; market context and demand; legal, institutional, and political conditions; or financing and capital stack options. In the second quarter, the groups will be reorganized, and the different teams will develop real estate development proposals, including programming, design, cash flow projections, and regulatory approval strategies. The groups will present their proposals to a jury of real estate and urban development professionals and faculty members and receive feedback. Students will return to campus for their final capstone project presentations in the summer.
Thesis Plan
Time-to-Degree
Students must complete the degree within four quarters from matriculation.
DEGREE | NORMATIVE TIME TO ATC (Quarters) | NORMATIVE TTD | MAXIMUM TTD |
M.U.R.P. |
Academic Disqualification and Appeal of Disqualification
University Policy
A student who fails to meet the above requirements may be recommended for academic disqualification from graduate study. A graduate student may be disqualified from continuing in the graduate program for a variety of reasons. The most common is failure to maintain the minimum cumulative grade point average (3.00) required by the Academic Senate to remain in good standing (some programs require a higher grade point average). Other examples include failure of examinations, lack of timely progress toward the degree and poor performance in core courses. Probationary students (those with cumulative grade point averages below 3.00) are subject to immediate dismissal upon the recommendation of their department. University guidelines governing academic disqualification of graduate students, including the appeal procedure, are outlined in Standards and Procedures for Graduate Study at UCLA .
Special Departmental or Program Policy
All Master’s students at UCLA are subject to university-wide policies and procedures governing study for the MRED degree. These policies and procedures are administered by the UCLA Graduate Division, a campus-wide unit dedicated to ensuring high-quality graduate degree programs at UCLA. Some of the most important of these requirements are summarized below. For additional details on these and other policies and procedures, refer to Standards & Procedures for Graduate Study at UCLA.
Students must maintain a grade point average of at least 3.0 (B) in all coursework undertaken, as required by the academic senate. Students failing to do so are placed on probation. Students whose cumulative GPA is below 3.0 for any three quarters will be asked to withdraw from the Program.
Any course that receives a grade below C- will not be permitted to count towards the degree. Any student who receives a grade below C- should consult with the Student Affairs Officer.
A counseling board is established for each student on probationary status (grade point average falls below 3.0 for the term) or making insufficient progress toward the degree. The board consists of three faculty members, including the student’s advisor. The counseling board meets with the student at least once each term as long as the student remains on probation. The board is responsible for reviewing the student’s record, determining strengths and weaknesses, and aiding the student in raising academic performance.
Students on probation, students admitted provisionally, or others not making sufficient progress toward the degree (e.g., part-time status or failing core courses) may be recommended for termination. Recommendations for termination may be made either by the counseling board through a written statement to the Program Director or by the Program Director, acting in consultation with the Executive Director and faculty advisor. Students recommended for termination may petition to have their situation reviewed by a three-person faculty review board. The review board, which includes the faculty advisor and two other faculty members (one chosen by the Program Director and one selected by the student), reviews the formal record and conducts a personal interview. The board then makes written recommendations to the Program Director. If students do not petition for a review board, or if the review board recommends termination, the recommendation is then made formally by the Urban Planning Department Chair on the advice of the Program Director to the Dean of the Graduate Division.
The MRED degree is normally obtained after three quarters of full-time study and part-time study during the fourth and final quarter. Students are expected to return to UCLA to present their required group capstone projects in the Summer quarter. They may petition to participate in the presentation remotely. Such petitions require approval by the Program Director in consultation with the Executive Director and are only occasionally granted in truly extenuating circumstances.
Students who have completed the normal one-year residence requirements (which are not the same as the University residence requirements) but who have yet to complete all of the requirements for graduation may petition to remain in the Program for one additional year to complete all remaining requirements. Such petitions require approval by Program Director in consultation with the Executive Director and are only occasionally granted in truly extenuating circumstances.
Only students who have completed all of the Master of Real Estate Development requirements for the first three quarters of their degree may participate in the commencement ceremonies. Specifically, students with outstanding “incomplete” grades in courses will not be permitted to “walk” in the commencement ceremonies.
Robin DiAngelo, the author of the 2018 best-seller White Fragility , is facing allegations that she plagiarized her 2004 doctoral thesis, including copying from minority scholars.
The Washington Free Beacon first reported the allegations , which were made in an anonymous complaint filed with the University of Washington . The school is where the dissertation was submitted, and DiAngelo is employed as an affiliate associate professor of education.
Though anonymous, the complaint matches similar complaints against other high-profile academics connected with diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI). This includes former Havard President Claudine Gay , the DEI head at Columbia University , and the head of a DEI program at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) .
That said, the complaint against DiAngelo is unique for two reasons. This is the first time the campaign has targeted a white academic and one who is not a university official. That said, her work focuses on racial discourse, making her an obvious target. This is especially true as her book, White Fragility , is a best seller.
The other allegations in this campaign have been mixed. Though some have highlighted real issues, others have attempted to make mountains out of molehills.
So, which is this? To answer that, we need to examine the allegations and determine how serious they are.
The 20-page complaint makes 20 separate allegations against DiAngelo. The allegations are not in page order and skip around the dissertation.
Most of the 20 allegations are either not examples of plagiarism or are, at best, very weak. For example, the first allegation deals with just 13 words. Though DiAngelo doesn’t cite the alleged source in that passage, she does elsewhere. Both sources describe a third paper and are likely pulling language from that.
Similarly, in the second allegation, DiAngelo does cite the alleged source. Though some text does overlap, it is only 14 words. While this is poor paraphrasing, it doesn’t sustain the argument that DiAngelo is trying to steal the work of other academics.
To be clear, these aren’t good. In an ideal world, you would not have passages like these. But they are not the greatest of academic sins either.
That’s not to say that there aren’t any problematic allegations. The twelfth one is probably the most troubling for me. It features a roughly 200-word passage clearly copied and pasted from an earlier source. DiAngelo does cite the source, but the citation is above the section in question, and there’s no indication that she is quoting the passage.
All in all, if someone handed me this document, I would recommend corrections and updates. However, given that many of the allegations are dubious and, even in total, only cover a small percentage of the dissertation, stronger action seems unwarranted.
At this point, the story follows the format of others we’ve seen. Though it highlights some legitimate issues, the complaint exaggerates the severity of the plagiarism, and the reporting around it has left off much of the nuance.
However, DiAngelo is unlike the other academics the campaign has targeted. She is a public figure, first and foremost. Her accountability statement says she will seek to “Always cite and give credit to the work of BIPOC people who have informed your thinking. When you use a phrase or idea you got from a BIPOC person, credit them.”
That did not happen here, at least not entirely.
While I don’t believe the evidence points to a malicious intent to steal others’ work, there was a lack of care and due diligence in places. In this case, I would argue that she did not live up to her accountability statement.
To be clear, I understand this pressure. As the author of a site named Plagiarism Today, I work hard to ensure my citations are as clean as possible. Often, I deliberately overcite out of an abundance of caution. However, I’m sure I’ve made mistakes over the past 18 years. But I acknowledge that my field and my presentation make those mistakes more problematic.
Still, it’s important to put this complaint into perspective. This complaint is not a good-faith attempt to improve academic or research integrity. It’s a targeted attack on a political or ideological opponent. But even if we take the whole complaint as truth, it represents approximately 2,000 words in a 72,000-word thesis. That equals roughly 3% of the completed dissertation.
While I agree that some corrective action is needed, that’s not what the complaint filers want. There’s no room for nuance or discussion when the goal is to discredit an ideology rather than address the actual issues in the work.
In the past, I’ve criticized this particular campaign on two grounds. First, as I said above, it’s a bad-faith effort to discredit political opponents, not an attempt to improve academic integrity. Here, plagiarism is simply a tool for political gain, not an issue to be addressed.
Second, the complaints have routinely tried to exaggerate the amount of plagiarism. In my reading of the complaint, 5-7 allegations warranted some response. However, 20 allegations look more impressive, even if most don’t hold up. It’s easier to get headlines with bigger numbers.
During the height of the original scandals, I talked about the weaponization of plagiarism and how it is used to target political and ideological opponents. As someone whose focus is plagiarism, that is deeply worrying to me.
Plagiarism, citation and attribution are important issues in and of themselves. However, discussing plagiarism requires a degree of nuance and care that isn’t possible when wielding it as a weapon.
That, in turn, is how weaponizing plagiarism cheapens it. It becomes a tool to be used rather than a problem to be solved.
That is very true in this case. Dubious claims have buried genuine issues, and a rush to condemn has replaced a nuanced conversation. This story should worry you regardless of how you feel about DiAngelo and her work.
Robin DiAngelo Headshot: JasonPToews , CC BY-SA 4.0 , via Wikimedia Commons
If you want to feature this article in your site, classroom or elsewhere, just let us know! We usually grant permission within 24 hours.
Click Here to Get Permission for Free
Thinking gender 2025, “gendered labors and transnational solidarities”, march 5–7, 2025.
CALL FOR PROPOSALS
Submission due date: Sunday, October 20, 2024, at 11:59 pm PDT
Apply Online
The UCLA Center for the Study of Women|Barbra Streisand Center invites proposals for our 35th annual Thinking Gender Graduate Student Research Conference (TG25).
This year’s conference theme, “ Gendered Labors and Transnational Solidarities ” highlights the rich repertoire of organizing strategies as well as contemporary and historical examples of campaigns led by precarious workers around the world. We invite proposals that employ a transnational feminist lens and that consider how workers have persisted in challenging injustice and demanding dignity by forming alliances across local, regional, and transnational contexts. We seek to bring together feminist, queer, and BIPOC scholars, artists, and organizers to reflect upon the meanings of labor solidarity and care to imagine a more livable society.
Workers have long been united in transnational solidarities. The urgency of transnational solidarities has increased in the wake of late-twentieth-century globalization, which has reshaped workers’ migration pathways, conditions of labor, and activism. Financialized capitalism has led to new labor regimes that disproportionately rely on a feminized and racialized workforce. The rise in low-paid contingent service work and outsourced manufacturing work has been accompanied by erosion of labor laws and social safety nets. Furthermore, stringent immigration regimes are exacerbating the precarity and labor exploitation of immigrant women of color and poor women in the Global South. However, these precarious workers have also been on the frontlines of labor organizing. For example, even though domestic workers have long been considered “unorganizable” because many lacked documentation status and worked in private households, domestic workers’ leadership has been central to expanding labor rights at both national and inter-governmental levels. In 2011, their efforts led to International Labour Organization Convention 189, the first global treaty establishing labor standards for domestic workers. In addition to demanding dignity on the job, precarious workers have also organized for social justice more broadly. Recently, Hyundai construction workers in South Korea began striking in solidarity with Palestinian people, calling attention to the connections between labor, settler colonialism, war, and ongoing effects of empire. Workers have also addressed injustices based on race, sex, sexuality, and citizenship status across local, regional, and international scales. We invite works that examine labor organizing through a transnational feminist lens, centering innovative strategies and campaigns workers have been building to forge solidarities across different parts of the world.
Possible questions for engagement include:
We encourage applicants to think within, alongside, beyond, and perhaps against the following topics as they consider the shape and content of their prospective participation in TG25:
1. Hybrid workshops for works-in-progress on Wednesday, March 5, 2025
Participants will workshop works-in-progress in closed online sessions either via Zoom or in person at the UCLA campus on Wednesday, March 5, 2025. Each workshop will include up to four graduate students, a faculty moderator, and up to three observers from other workshops, who will read and provide detailed feedback and questions for each submission. All participants will be asked to read or view each other’s submissions in advance. Participants will then convene with a faculty moderator who will offer constructive feedback and facilitate discussion around each submission.
All workshop participants will be required to submit the final version of their work-in-progress (not to exceed 20–25 double-spaced pages) by Sunday, February 2, 2025, for pre-circulation among their co-participants and faculty moderator. Please only submit your work for a workshop if you are prepared to have a final draft ready for circulation by this date.
2. In-person presentations on Friday, March 7, 2025
Participants who submit a proposal for work that will be completed a month before the conference date will give a public presentation of their finished projects at a panel on the UCLA campus on Friday, March 7, 2025. In addition, participants will take advantage of other in-person activities offered at the conference.
We welcome a range of submission formats from graduate students , including scholarly papers, works in hybrid critical/creative genres (e.g., multimedia projects, performance, experimental forms of academic writing), and film/mixed media. In celebration of embodied practices of healing led by workers’ organizations, worker-centered artwork would fit particularly well for this year’s call.
Eligibility
Registered graduate students from any institution are eligible to submit abstracts or synopses of scholarly papers, works in hybrid critical/creative genres (e.g., multimedia projects, performance, experimental forms of academic writing), or film/mixed media to present or workshop. Applicants cannot submit multiple proposals and must choose if they will present completed works or works-in-progress. Only one submission per applicant will be considered.
Please only submit if you are available for the full day , since we cannot confirm which time the panel/workshop will be until later in the planning process.
Submissions of works that are collaborative or co-authored with other students are welcome.
Unpublished submissions are preferred . Recently published and forthcoming articles will be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Submissions that are not directly related to the theme, “Gendered Labors and Transnational Solidarities” will not be considered.
Due date for Abstract/Synopsis Submissions: Sunday, October 20, 2024 at 11:59 pm PDT.
Applicants whose submissions are accepted will be notified by Friday, December 6, 2024.
All proposals must be submitted using the online application form .
Only complete submissions received by the due date will be considered.
Scholarly Paper, Dissertation or Thesis Chapter, or Article Draft Application Requirements:
1. Abstract (max. 250 words) of work to be presented/workshopped that includes: (1) a thesis/research question, (2) methods, (3) theoretical framework, and (4) conclusions or anticipated conclusions.
2. Works Cited or References List (1 page maximum)
3. CV (2 pages maximum)
Film/Mixed Media or Hybrid Critical/Creative Genres Application Requirements:
1. Film/Media Synopsis (2 double-spaced pages maximum) of work to be presented/workshopped that includes: (1) a research question or thesis, (2) description of format, (3) discussion of theoretical framework, methodology and process, (4) explanation of your argument and evidence, and (5) conclusions or anticipated conclusions. If your piece is co-created with other students, please make this clear .
2. CV (2 pages maximum)
3. Link (YouTube, Vimeo, etc.) where Film or Mixed Media can be viewed. Total run-time should not exceed 20 minutes. Note: our submission platform does not have capacity to hold media files. Please insert links into your synopsis.
Contact Thinking Gender Coordinator Da In Choi at [email protected] .
UCLA Center for the Study of Women|Barbra Streisand Center, 1500 Public Affairs Building, BOX 957222, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7222
The CSW|Streisand Center at UCLA acknowledges our presence on the traditional, ancestral and unceded territory of the Gabrielino/Tongva peoples.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Your thesis statement is one of the most important parts of your paper. It expresses your main argument succinctly and explains why your argument is historically significant. Think of your thesis as a promise you make to your reader about what your paper will argue. Then, spend the rest of your paper-each body paragraph-fulfilling that promise.
Crafting a good thesis is one of the most challenging parts of the writing process, so do not expect to perfect it on the first few tries. Successful writers revise their thesis statements again and again. A successful thesis statement: • makes a historical argument. • takes a position that requires defending. • is historically specific.
View Thesis & Dissertation Filing Requirements PDF. This is the official UCLA manuscript preparation guide that contains established criteria for uniformity in the format of theses and dissertations. The regulations included in it supersede any style manual instructions regarding format. Also includes information on filing dates and procedures ...
Once you have responses for each piece of the thesis statement, you can try to put them together into one or two sentences that clearly state(s) your idea. One way to start putting your ideas together is by using the "Magic Thesis Statement." This formula is often not the best way to phrase your thesis in the end, but
The last date that all of the items listed above is complete will be your filing date for your thesis or dissertation. For example, if you submit your final dissertation PDF and complete the online process on May 31, three committee members sign on June 1, and the final committee member signs on June 2, your filing date will be June 2 assuming ...
Approved by UCLA Graduate Council on May 15, 2015 In filing your thesis or dissertation (the Work, including any abstract), in partial fulfillment of the requirements for your degree at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), you agree to the following terms and conditions. 1. Grant of Rights.
UCLA has access to all full text dissertations in the database. Non-UCLA users may use Dissertations Express to purchase digital or print copies of individual dissertations. Over 5 million dissertations and theses available in OCLC member libraries. Many theses are available electronically, at no charge, directly from the publishing institution.
Thesis Statements — What? How? Why? Structure Published: January 11, 2016. Thesis Statements -- What? How? Why? Structure. Search. About; People; Undergrad; Grad; ESL; Placement; Resources; Campus Partners; WP in the Community; UCLA Writing Programs is part of the Humanities Division within UCLA College. Kaplan Hall Ste 146 | Los Angeles, CA ...
Thesis Statements UCLA History Writing Center 2015 Ceren Abi [email protected]. 11/20/2015 2 Are they mythical? Common Mistakes O Restating the topic/subject O Mismatch between thesis statement and the rest of the paper O Regurgitating someone else's point of view. (Prof. Brown argues that French Revolution provided great
Appointments. About. Resources. Meet the Staff. Phil Writ Ctr. Undergraduate Writing Center is part of the Humanities Division within UCLA College. A61 Kaplan Hall | Los Angeles, CA 90095 | P: 310-206-1320 | E: [email protected].
Although the thesis can be found almost anywhere in an essay or other piece of writing, it is usually found at or near the end of the introductory paragraph. The thesis or thesis statement refers to a paper's main argument or central claim. Unlike an ordinary statement (which may merely state a fact or idea), a thesis takes a
Learning Outcomes. identify the requisite steps to writing a thesis statement. recognize examples of effective and ineffective thesis statements. identify the components of a well structured thesis statement. recognize that the thesis writing process is flexible, nonlinear, and susceptible to change.
Introductions & Conclusions. The introduction and conclusion serve important roles in a history paper. They are not simply perfunctory additions in academic writing, but are critical to your task of making a persuasive argument. A successful introduction will: draw your readers in. culminate in a thesis statement that clearly states your argument.
Wednesday, March 27th, 1:00-2:00 PM—Thesis and Dissertation Writing in STEM Fields (Final Stages) ... we recommend looking one from your department in the ProQuest Dissertation database available through the UCLA Library. This database allows you to search by institution, advisor, and manuscript type (master's thesis versus dissertation).
Formatting Your UCLA Thesis. Click below for the updated dissertation formatting requirements from the Graduate Division, as of March 2012. A LaTeX package previously maintained (last dated known update in 2010) by John Heidemann is also available. For more information about this package, please consult the wiki page provided by git-hub.
Handouts and Online Resources for Students. Writing at the University. Beyond the 5-Paragraph Essay. Writing Tips for Transfer Students. Pre-Writing. Breaking Down Your Reading Assignment. Reading Essay Prompts. Dealing with Writer's Block. Writing: Getting Started.
Historically, most doctoral dissertations and selected master's theses were deposited in the Library's main collections. Those theses and dissertations can be found in the Catalog under the subject headings Dissertations, Academic--UCLA--[Department].As of 2012, UCLA's Graduate Division switched to all digital submissions, so the Library no longer receives print copies of UCLA theses and ...
Open Access Theses & Dissertations. Theses and dissertations produced by students as part of the completion of their degree requirements often represent unique and interesting scholarship. Universities are increasingly making this work available online, and UC is no exception. Find information related to open access theses and dissertations below.
Students in the masters programs at UCLA can use this to request advancement to candidacy status by listing courses they have taken. Nomination of Master's Thesis Committee. Master's students can nominate their thesis committee and read UCLA's regulations. Part-Time Enrollment. University-wide policy and procedure on part-time graduate ...
The admissions committee considers the following factors: three letters of recommendation from the student's former or current professors. the applicant's statement of purpose (1000 Words). personal statement. a writing sample of no longer than 10 pages, double spaced (not including bibliography). foreign language training.
Master's Theses & Reports. Elizabeth Arnold, M.A. Unveiling Diasporic Markets: An Archaeology of Consumption in California's Chinatowns. Chair: Monica L. Smith, Ph.D. Natalie Finnegan, M.A. Mitochondrial DNA for phylogeny building: Assessing individual and grouped mtGenes as proxies for the mtGenome in platyrrhines. Chair: Jessica Lynch, Ph.D.
Dissertation Year Award. This program is intended to support doctoral students who are advanced to candidacy at the time of nomination by their department to the Division of Graduate Education. Applicants should be within one year of completing and filing the dissertation and planning to start teaching or research appointments soon after the ...
Advisor (s): Stivers, Tanya J. (2024) Pediatric medical visits represent a unique opportunity for studying uncertainty, authority, and agency. In these visits medical authority and parental authority converge on a common goal — the child's best interests. However, physicians and parents do not always agree on what courses of action are best.
The conclusion of your thesis paper is your opportunity to sum up your argument and leave your reader thinking about why your research matters. Attari breaks the conclusion down into simple parts. "You restate the original issue and thesis statement, explain the experiment's results and discuss possible next steps for further research," she ...
UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs. ... Thesis Plan. None. Time-to-Degree . Students must complete the degree within four quarters from matriculation. ... Recommendations for termination may be made either by the counseling board through a written statement to the Program Director or by the Program Director, acting in consultation with the ...
Robin DiAngelo, the author of the 2018 best-seller White Fragility, is facing allegations that she plagiarized her 2004 doctoral thesis, including copying from minority scholars.. The Washington Free Beacon first reported the allegations, which were made in an anonymous complaint filed with the University of Washington.The school is where the dissertation was submitted, and DiAngelo is ...
Scholarly Paper, Dissertation or Thesis Chapter, or Article Draft Application Requirements: 1. Abstract (max. 250 words) of work to be presented/workshopped that includes: (1) a thesis/research question, (2) methods, (3) theoretical framework, and (4) conclusions or anticipated conclusions. 2. Works Cited or References List (1 page maximum) 3.