research paper for law

University of Bristol Law School

Law working papers series.

Welcome to the Bristol Law Working Papers Series. The series publishes a broad range of legal scholarship in all subject areas from members of the University of Bristol Law School. All papers are published electronically and available to download as pdf files.

Working papers

Going forward by staying put: the political economy of stabilizing trade agreements and initiatives (pdf, 1,533kb).

Author: Christian Delev

This article examines the emerging practice of states entering into trade agreements or negotiating initiatives which sustain parties’ existing market access commitments and ‘behind-the-border’ regulatory barriers to trade.

The Legal Status and Targeting of Hacker Groups in the Russia-Ukraine Cyber Conflict (PDF, 1,750kB)

Author: Giacomo Biggio

The armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine has been characterized by a considerable number of cyber operations. This article considers the legal status of hacker groups and individuals who have conducted cyber operations in support of Ukraine and the legality of targeting of individual who directly participate in hostilities.

Migration and Work in the Post-Brexit UK (PDF, 1,603kB)

Authors: Manoj Dias-Abey and Katie Bales

This briefing paper examines the major labour migration pathways in the new post-Brexit migration system that came into force on 1 January 2021.

Default Norms in Labour Law- From Private Right to Public Law (PDF, 1,525kB)

Author: Alan Bogg

How far can the common law limit freedom of contract in employment contracts? This paper considers the limits of freedom of contract in relation to (i) contracting out of employment status; (ii) contracting out of implied terms. It argues that public policy can impose necessary limits on the employer's contractual powers.

Exceptions and Regulatory Autonomy (PDF, 1,504kB)

Author: Joshua Paine

This paper provides a comparative overview and analysis of exceptions commonly included in Preferential Trade Agreements.

An Analysis of the UK–Australia FTA’s Investment Chapter (PDF, 630kB) Author: Joshua Paine

A Kantian moral cosmopolitan approach to teaching professional legal ethics (PDF, 693kB) Author: Omar Madhloom

COVID-19 at Work: How risk is assessed & its consequences in England & Sweden (PDF, 837kB) A‌uthors: Peter Andersson and Tonia Novitz

Capturing the value of community fuel poverty alleviation (PDF, 1,891kB) Authors: Colin Nolden, Daniela Rossade and Peter Thomas

Bridging the Spaces in-between? The IWGB and Strategic Litigation (PDF, 522kB)  Author: Manoj Dias-Abey

View past papers

Writing a law school research paper or law review note

• Books and articles

Basics of Format & Content

Research papers are not as strictly structured as legal memos, briefs, and other documents that you've learned about in legal writing and drafting courses. For example, there is no prescribed content/format similar to to the Questions Presented, Brief Answers, etc. that you learned for a legal memo.

A general approach to thinking about the content of a research paper is:

• Introduction in which you give some background and a clear statement of your thesis
• Status quo -- what is the existing law and why is it a problem
• Proposals for change

See this blog post by Jonathan Burns , an IU McKinney alum, for more on basic content.

If you're writing for a law review or seminar, you should get formatting instructions regarding things like margins, font size, line spacing. If you don't, or if you're doing an independent study, here are some basic guidelines to follow:

• Times New Roman or similar, 12 pt font.
• Double spaced lines.
• One inch margins all around.
• Footnotes in academic Bluebook style (use the rules on the main white pages instead of the light blue pages at the front of the Bluebook).
• Footnotes in same font as text, 10 pt font.
• Use Roman numerals and/or letters on headings and subheadings or style the fonts so that the difference between headings and subheadings is clear.   
• Page numbers in the footer, preferably centered, especially on first page. You could do bottom center on first page and then upper right in the header thereafter. Use the header and footer functions for this. If you don't know how to use headers and footers in Word, here is help:  https://edu.gcfglobal.org/en/word2016/headers-and-footers/1/ . 

Headings and subheadings

Research papers should have headings and subheadings. These help your reader follow your logic--and a logical structure is very important. Headings and subheadings can also help you keep your thoughts organized. Just don't overuse them--you don't want every paragaph to have a subheading. 

Road map paragraph

Often, research papers will also include a paragraph at the end of the introduction that narrates the road map the paper will follow.   Here is an example of this kind of paragraph:

"The section that follows [this introduction] sets the stage by recounting two scenarios from the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, with discussion of the knowledge and implementation of accessibility features in online instructional materials. The next section provides an overview of various impairments and their effects on a user's experience of the online environment. Next is a review of the laws relevant to accessibility with attention to their potential application to online instruction, along with standards used to guide accessibility compliance. The article then explores the concept of universal design and its guiding principles, followed by a discussion of how to use the universal design principles to organize and better understand accessibility standards and practices. The final section briefly summarizes the discussion and encourages law librarians and professors to become knowledgeable and skilled in universal design for online materials to benefit all their students."

Table of Contents

A table of contents can also be helpful, though it's not necessary. If you add a table of contents to your papers, put it right at the beginning, before the introduction. Here's part of the table of contents for the same paper the paragraph above was taken from--it really just lays out the heading and subheadings with page numbers: 

• << Previous: Home
• Next: Books and articles >>
• Last Updated: Jul 29, 2022 11:08 AM
• URL: https://law.indiana.libguides.com/c.php?g=1071346

Harvard Law School, Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series

The Harvard Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series journal makes available abstracts and papers in the areas of public law, both domestic and international, and legal theory, broadly defined. Papers may be submitted to the journal's editor, Carol Steiker, at [email protected] , or to Professor Steiker's assistant, Amanda Cegielski, at [email protected] . Submissions must include the paper, a short abstract, and the author's Harvard Law School affiliation. To access all the papers in this series, please use the following URL: http://www.ssrn.com/link/harvard-public-law.html

Global Reach of Harvard Law School, Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series

Paper Downloads by Country

Papers from Harvard Law School, Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series

Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research ISSN: 2582-8878 | PIF: 6.605 Indexed at Manupatra, Google Scholar, HeinOnline & ROAD

INDIAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND LEGAL RESEARCH

ISSN: 2582-8878 (O)

Subject Area: Law and Related Disciplines

Publication Impact Factor: 6.605

Plagiarism Limit - Upto 25 Percent

Plagiarism Software - Turnitin and Plagiarism X

Publication Frequency - Bi-monthly

CALL FOR PAPERS

The IJLLR is inviting authors across India and the Globe to contribute their pieces of academic writings for publication.  Volume: Volume V Issue IV |  Theme: Law & Related Disciplines

Perks:  Certificates of Publication, Certificate of Excellence, Free DOI Link, Internship Opportunities, 48-hour Review Process, Indexed at Google Scholar, HeinOnline, Manupatra, ROAD  & others.

* Verify our Manupatra, Google Scholar & ROAD Indexing by clicking the Buttons given above.

** Do not fall prey to journals making false claims regarding their Indexing at various databases.

IJLLR Journal is an online bi-monthly   journal with 6 Issues per year. The Journal revolves around Socio-legal  topics and is not restricted to any particular field or subject of law. The Journal promotes interdisciplinary research entailing detailed study of law with other disciplines in the contemporary era.

IJLLR aims to provide a platform where everyone related to the field of law can contribute their research work on any topic related to law and help create a quality open-access platform that can be used by anyone to gain or develop their knowledge and expertise in the subject of law.

Provide a detailed conceptualisation of socio-economic phenomenon and its interplay with law and policy-making.

Encourage  interdisciplinary and  comparative research  to develop a holistic and multifaceted approach towards the complex issues of today’s society.

Critically and intellectually engage with contemporary issues and the discourse surrounding them.

Enable the development of legal intellect, critical analysis and quality research by promoting original legal writing. 

PERKS OF GETTING PUBLISHED AT IJLLR

Publication Certificate  - Certificate of publication is given to all the authors published in each issue without any additional cost. The certificate is given to the authors as soon as the publication is live.

Free DOI (Digital Object Identification) - A DOI is a string of numbers, letters and symbols used to permanently identify an article or document and link to it on the web. A DOI will help your reader easily locate a document from your citation.

Certificate of Excellence - The top 10 authors in each issue are given a Certificate of Excellence for their publication with other prizes.

Indexed:  The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research is indexed in reputable places like Google Scholar & Manupatra which makes the articles available to a wider community making the research available to all. 

Hard Copy Available: The authors have the choice to get a hard copy of their Publication Certificate/Certificate of Excellence on payment of a minimal fee after their manuscript is published.

No Delays and Timely Process  - The whole review process takes up to 72 hours (1-3 days). The final publication after the payment of the processing fee is done within 24-72 hours (1-3 Working days).

Internship Opportunities: The top authors are provided with internship opportunities.

Chance to be a Student Editor: Students are also provided with an opportunity to work as an editor for the Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research .

TYPES OF SUBMISSIONS ACCEPTED ​

The IJLLR Journal invites original, unpublished manuscripts from all academicians, authors, legal professionals and Law students in the following categories:

I. Long Articles (3000-6000 words)

II. Essays/Short Articles (1500-3000 words)

III. Case Notes and Legislative Comments (1200-2500 words)

Submissions in this category are expected to engage with the theme and literature of a particular topic comprehensively. The article must survey current practice in the field, identify any lacunae and offer innovative reassessment along with constructive suggestions. Theoretical pieces are also welcome in this category.

Essays/short articles are more concise in scope and are focused on a particular issue and offer new perspectives and critical insights on the selected topic. They offer clearly identifiable arguments and may provide different ways of conceptualizing the selected issue.

This category is meant for the analysis of any contemporary judicial pronouncement, legislative action, or policy proposal. Notes and Comments must trace the line of cases in which the decision appears and comment on its implications on the evolution of that branch of law. Similarly, a legislative comment or policy proposal must identify the object and expected impact of the legislative action/policy proposal in question.

INDEXING PARTNERS

Artificial Intelligence and Law: An Overview

Georgia State University Law Review, Vol. 35, 2019

U of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 19-22

34 Pages Posted: 30 Jun 2019 Last revised: 9 Jul 2019

Harry Surden

University of Colorado Law School

Date Written: June 28, 2019

Much has been written recently about artificial intelligence (AI) and law. But what is AI, and what is its relation to the practice and administration of law? This article addresses those questions by providing a high-level overview of AI and its use within law. The discussion aims to be nuanced but also understandable to those without a technical background. To that end, I first discuss AI generally. I then turn to AI and how it is being used by lawyers in the practice of law, people and companies who are governed by the law, and government officials who administer the law. A key motivation in writing this article is to provide a realistic, demystified view of AI that is rooted in the actual capabilities of the technology. This is meant to contrast with discussions about AI and law that are decidedly futurist in nature.

Keywords: artificial intelligence, ai, law, machine learning, prediction, informatics

Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation

Harry Surden (Contact Author)

University of colorado law school ( email ).

401 UCB Boulder, CO 80309 United States

HOME PAGE: http://lawweb.colorado.edu/profiles/profile.jsp?id=316

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics, related ejournals, university of colorado law school legal studies research paper series.

Subscribe to this free journal for more curated articles on this topic

Cognitive Social Science eJournal

Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic

Law & Society: The Legal Profession eJournal

Cognition in mathematics, science, & technology ejournal, legal information, technology & law librarianship ejournal, artificial intelligence - law, policy, & ethics ejournal, library services & librarianship ejournal.

Researching Law School Papers

• Research papers
• Coming up with a topic
• Checking for preemption
• Expanding your research

Resources on academic legal writing

Make a research appointment.

Reference librarians are available to help you get started and research your topic. 

• Stop by the Reference Desk in the library lobby
• Email: [email protected]

Articles (UC Davis law students may access from offsite using Kerberos password)

• Stalking the Golden Topic: A Guide to Locating and Selecting Topics for Legal Research Papers by Heather Meeker
• Writing a Student Article by Eugene Volokh
• How to Write a Law Review Article by Richard Delgado
• How to Write a Law Review Article by Sean Burke

• << Previous: Expanding your research
• Last Updated: Jul 24, 2024 2:56 PM
• URL: https://libguides.law.ucdavis.edu/seminarpapers

How to write a legal research paper: All you need to know

This article on “How to write a legal research paper: All you need to know” was written by Vridhi Rai, an intern at Legal Upanishad.

Introduction:

Law is all about analysis, critical thinking, and interpretation. Your capability to put together the analysis of the study of the issues in written form is essential in the practice of law. The research paper is one such way to express your creative and analytic thought process, your vision of the theme, and the originality of your content. The word ‘research’ means a systematic examination of material facts. It can be complex and daunting for law students. But research helps in enhancing your knowledge and cultivating your writing skills. This article will help you understand what is research paper all about and how to write a research paper.

What is a research paper?

A research paper is a piece of academic writing which is based on an author’s original composition in the research and the findings on a given theme or topic. The writing should be owned by the author himself or herself. A good research paper strives to convey the information traced by the author crisply and concisely. The paper is written to examine the theme or the provisions, present your stand on it, and showcase evidence in support in a systematic manner. The true nature of the paper shows you the purpose of the theme or topic. 

What is the aim of the legal research paper?

The aim of the legal research paper can be a subjective question since the writing will indicate what the intended outcome is. There are kinds of writings that would pave a way for courts because it geared toward a certain kind of doctrinal analysis of the court’s interaction with theory and practice. The writings are done for better interpretation of the law. It could also be used to influence policy-making and generate debates. The author has a specific objective and intended audience in mind to serve.

How to write a legal research paper?

Step-1 choose a theme or topic:.

The foremost step in writing a  legal research paper is to select a theme or topic for the research. Select topics that catch your attention or interest. You can pick topics addressing contemporary issues or topics for the intended audience you wish to cater to. It should be novel, innovative, and interesting. While choosing a topic, read pertinent issues from different sources.  You can follow legal news to search for pertinent topics.

In case, you find difficulty selecting a topic, it will be wonderful for you to approach your professors, colleagues, and friends for consultation. Also, never feel hesitant to change the theme or topic of the research, if you feel it is not the right topic or you will not able to research the topic effectively.

Step-2 Research on your topic:

Now, your next task is to research the topic extensively on your selected topic from credible sources. You can refer to different sources by reading legal research pieces from books to online sites like SCC online, Manupatra, and Kluwer Arbitration. Always remember don’t just goggle. Use conventional sources like books and articles, these will give you a broader perspective. Read as much as you can. Reading helps you understand the nitty-gritty of the law provisions. Please beware of the research as this task can be very monotonous. You might lose motivation to perform this task. But hang in there and stay motivated to find interesting facts.

Step-3 Examine and Make a plan:

After researching, your very next step is to examine and make a plan to execute writing a legal research paper. Your research will be comprehensive with ideas. Please develop a detailed outline. Try adding notes to your research work. It can be possible that you might end up adding too much information to your paper. Highlight the key findings from your study. At this stage you are required to identify the goal of your research work, it can be either argumentative or analytic. You have to determine the masses you are wishing to address. The focus and the tone of the paper should b according to the audience you are intending to reach.

To get your Legal Research Paper written by an expert. Contact us.

Step-4 writing the paper:.

The next step is to draft the research paper. Make a final outline of the research work. The outline must have the points to describe the overview of the paper. The basic mantra of legal research is the structure of the paper. The research paper writing should be creative, clear, concise, and comprehensive. The language of your research paper should be easy to interpret. The legal terminologies and material facts are generally very sophisticated and complex. The facts, you are mentioning must be backed by shreds of evidence.

The format of the legal research paper:

The paper should have a proper format that consists of writing styles, referencing styles, page numbering, spacing, and margins. It should also include the headlines, sub-headlines, citations, or credits to the authors and the scholars.

The content of the legal research paper:

The content consists of the following:

Acknowledgment : the content of the paper should include an acknowledgment section that appreciates all the contributors to the research paper for their efforts and encouragement.

Table of contents: it includes the list of the things that you have written in your research paper.

Scope of the research: the scope or object of the research includes the reason for your study. It shows you the skeleton of your research paper. You have stated the problem or issue of the paper.

A literature survey or the sources used in the study: it includes the sources you have referred to in your study. It can be primary or secondary resources. The primary resources include books, statutes, and case laws. The secondary sources include the material you have collected from law articles, journals, and compendiums online or offline.

The hypothesis of the research: the hypothesis is the idea that is suggested to explain the objective of the research conducted by the researcher. It conveys the expectations of the researcher on what basis he started studying the issues, he raised in his paper.

Abstract : abstract shows the gist of the theme you have mentioned in your study. It is like the summary of the findings in your research regarding the theme. It should be written clearly and concisely.

Introduction: the introduction should be well-written to attract the attention of the audience toward the theme you mentioned in your thesis. A glance over the initial paragraphs gives an insight to the readers of your work. The introduction determines whether the research paper is worth reading or not. It should express the research problem, the purpose of your thesis, and background details about the issue you are referring to. It should be short, crisp, and comprehensive.

The main body of the study: the main focus of the paper is the main body of the thesis. The body should be divided into paragraphs along with sub-headings for a better understanding of the facts. Each paragraph should draw the main points of your study. It should begin with the topic’s sentences and should conclude extensively. In the main body, you can add the case laws and judgments.  

The conclusion of the study: the finale of the study should include a summary of the main pointers discussed in the study, it should express your stand or viewpoint towards the research problem. The concluding para of your research can be affirmative or negative in tone. In the end, you can add some suggestive measures to your study.

References or bibliography: at the end of the paper mention the references or the sources links or sites from which you have researched the material facts.

Step – 5 edit and proofread the final draft of the research paper:

Use proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Proofreading will help you to find errors in your content. If you need, to make changes to the paper, check and find the logic and legality of the statement. At this stage, you check the plagiarism of your content.

The things that should be considered carefully before drafting the paper:

you need to check the validity of the judgments before mentioning them in the research paper. The validity of the bills mentioned in your study should be carefully considered. The errors related to applicability or jurisdictions should be carefully verified.

Conclusion:

Legal research is not an easy task to perform. It takes a lot of time to conduct it. Constant hard work, attention, motivation, and patience are the factors required to examine and analyze the details. It can be boring. But it will help you in brushing your skills. Your efforts and dedication toward finding more and more material facts will help in shaping you into a good researcher.

It is beneficial for law students for interpreting law provisions, policies, and judgments. It can be used as a medium to influence policy-making procedures and as a tool to aware the masses. Publication of your research papers will act as a stimulating force to your law career. It will help you build your confidence and help them transform into law professionals.

References:

• How to write a legal research paper: guide: how to write a winning research paper?- Legal Desire. Retrieved: https://legaldesire.com/guide-how-to-write-a-winning-research-paper/
• A helpful guide on writing a law research paper- Writing help. Retrieved: https://howtowrite.customwritings.com/post/law-research-paper-guide/
• How to begin with writing a legal research paper- Manupatra- youtube channel-(video file)
• How to write a legal research paper law?|research paper- Eminent law classes-(Video file)
• The aim of writing a legal research paper- the art of writing a legal research paper-Rohini Sen-letter of the law-(video file)

Join Our Community

Directed Research Projects

• Getting Started
• Preparing to Research
• The Research Process

Structuring Your Paper

Writing tips, writing resources.

• Checking your Sources
• Getting it Published

There is no strict structure to writing a legal research paper.  Unlike legal memos written for class or documents prepared for court proceedings that require formatted headings such as "Question Presented," "Statement of Facts," etc., legal research papers are not required to contain prescribed content or abide by a particular structure.

That said, below is a typical approach to organizing the content of your research project.

• Introduction (clear statement of your thesis)
• Background information (what is the existing law, if any)
• The problem (explain why the status quo does't work)
• Recommendation for change (what can be done to improve the field and how)
• Conclusion (tie back to your thesis)

If you have any questions about formatting your research project, you should seek advice from your faculty advisor.  Below are some basic guidelines, but keep in mind formatting requirements set forth by your faculty advisor will always supersede instructions provided here.

Generally, directed research papers are formatted as follows:

• 12-point font (Times New Roman or similar)
• Double-spaced lines
• One-inch margins on both sides, top, and bottom
• 10-point font for footnotes (same font as text)
• Bluebook style and rules for all footnotes citations
• Roman numerals and/or letter headings and subheadings (same font as text but bolded and/or underlined)
• Numbered pages in the footer (same font as text)

Table of Contents

Although not required (unless your faculty advisor states otherwise), a table of contents can be helpful to provide your reader with an overview of your research paper and direct them to certain sections.  Your table of contents should mirror your headings and subheadings.  Below is an example of a table of contents.

When to Cite

You must include a citation every time you refer to, paraphrase, or quote a law, case, or another's work.  Most of your sentences will include a citation.  Additionally, when you cite to a law, always cite to the primary source.

How to Cite

The Bluebook, formally titled  The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation , is the style manual for citing to legal documents within the United States.  You should use the Bluebook for all your citations in your legal paper.  The white page section contain the citation rules for legal academic publications.

Writing a Strong Introduction

Your introduction is arguably the most important section of your paper because many people will decide to continue reading based on the introduction.  It must grab the reader's attention and explain why what you are writing about is important.

Essentially, the reader should be able to skim the rest of your paper after reading your introduction and have a good understanding of its layout and arguments.  A good introduction should present the theme of the paper in a succinct manner while providing an overview of your paper.

Generally, a strong introduction will

• State the legal problem/issue;
• Describe why it is important and how your paper contributes to the discussion;
• Provide a road map of your paper; and
• State your conclusion.

Being Objective & Subjective

After your introduction, you should discuss background information on the issue you chose to write about.  This should be an objective overview of the relevant facts and existing law.  Your objective background information section should not be an all encompassing.  Keep this portion of your paper focused on the essential law and relevant facts that support your recommendation for change. 

The bulk of your paper lays in your discussion of the problem and recommendation for change.  This is the subjective portion of your paper.  In this section you should extract the relevant objective material to support your subjective analysis.

Writing a Strong Conclusion

Your conclusion should restate your thesis, summarize your major points, and remind the reader why the issue you've chosen is important.  The conclusion should essentially reword your introduction in a condensed fashion. 

• << Previous: The Research Process
• Next: Checking your Sources >>
• Last Updated: May 14, 2024 4:23 PM
• URL: https://guides.law.stanford.edu/c.php?g=1255722

• Stanford Home
• Maps & Directions
• Search Stanford
• Emergency Info
• Terms of Use
• Non-Discrimination
• Accessibility

© Stanford University , Stanford , California 94305 .

Research Guides & Videos

Whether you’re starting a research project or reviewing for an exam, find the resources and explanations you need in our collection of research guides and study aids.

Research Guides by Topic

We’re here to help.

Having trouble finding what you need? We can help with search strategies, resource recommendations, and more.

Ask a Librarian

Study Guides

Audio case files.

Review cases while you work out or commute! AudioCaseFiles provides audio recordings of opinions selected from cases commonly read in first and second year courses. The recordings are produced using professional voice actors and are available for download as mp3 files.

Aspen Learning Library

Access hundreds of your favorite study aids – from Examples & Explanations to Glannon Guides – in ebook, PDF or ePub form. Set up a personalized login to save notes, highlights and bookmarks.

CALI Lessons

CALI, the Center for Computer-Assisted Legal Instruction, provides access to an extensive collection of interactive, computer-based lessons covering a number of subject areas.

Learn the basics and beyond with our in-house instructional videos.

Featured Video Playlists

Related videos grouped together to help you understand a topic quickly.

Legal Research Strategy

Perfect for beginning researchers, this playlist goes through the legal research process step-by-step – 9 videos

Prepare to Practice: Advancing Your Research

This playlist covers advanced legal research concepts and is useful for students starting their summer employment or a new job – 6 videos

Modal Gallery

Gallery block modal gallery.

Home > NLSJ

The National Law School Journal (NLSJ) is the flagship journal of the National Law School of India University, Bengaluru. It is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal that has consistently published original contributions to contemporary legal scholarship on India and the developing world since 1989. The journal’s Editorial Board includes the Vice-Chancellor and members of the faculty. NLSJ invites contributions from academics, practitioners and researchers across legal studies and allied interdisciplinary scholarship.

NLSJ is published twice a year. The journal is indexed in UGC-CARE.

The National Law School of India University, Bengaluru is India’s premiere law school and has pioneered legal education reforms for over three decades.

Current Issue: Volume 17, Issue 1 (2023)

Tunnels as Temples of 'New Green India': Dominant Narratives of Himalayan Dam Building Manshi Asher and Vivek Negi

Locating the 'Nanny' in Legal Theory Akshat Agarwal

The Uber Conundrum: Analysing the Worker Rights of Uber Drivers in India Shantanu Braj Choubey

Case Comment

The Difference Method Makes: Judicial Restraint and Judicial Creativity in Rana Nahid v Sahidul Chisti Saptarshi Mandal

Book Review

Book Review | Sangeeta Dasgupta, 'Reordering Adivasi Worlds: Representation, Resistance, Memory' (Oxford University Press 2022) Nishant Gokhale

• Journal Home
• Aims and Scope
• Submission Guidelines
• Editorial Board
• The NLS Blog
• Submit Article
• Most Popular Papers
• Receive Email Notices or RSS

Advanced Search

ISSN: 0971-491X

Home | About | FAQ | My Account | Accessibility Statement

Privacy Copyright

Scholarship@Cornell Law

Home > Legal Studies Research Papers

Cornell Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series

The Cornell Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series presents the scholarship of the Cornell Law School faculty on a broad range of law-related and interdisciplinary topics.

Browse the Cornell Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series Collections:

Cornell Law School Legal Studies Research Papers

Advanced Search

• Notify me via email or RSS
• Collections
• Disciplines

Author Corner

• Submit Research

Home | About | FAQ | My Account | Accessibility Statement

• Legal Fundaments
• Legal Research

LEGAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: AN OVERVIEW

• October 2021
• 8(10):442-484

• SAMBALPUR UNIVERSITY, JYOTI VIHAR, BURLA-768019

Discover the world's research

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations
• Nasir Majeed
• Amjad Hilal
• Arshad Nawaz Khan
• FUADI, MUHAMMAD NATSIR, ANDI RACHMAD, ZAKI ULYA

• Ika Riswanti Putranti
• Marten Hanura

• Gawinda Nura Nabila

• Muhammad Akbar
• Mohamad Didi Permana
• Hazmi Rusli

• Indah Kusuma Dewi

• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up

Law Thesis Topics

This page provides a comprehensive list of law thesis topics , designed to assist students in navigating the broad and intricate field of legal studies. Choosing the right thesis topic is crucial for every law student, as it not only contributes to their academic success but also helps in shaping their future career paths. The list encompasses a wide range of specialized areas within the law, including but not limited to administrative law, corporate law, criminal justice, and human rights law. Each category is rich with potential research questions that reflect current challenges and emerging trends in the legal landscape. This resource aims to inspire and support students by providing them with a vast array of topics, thereby facilitating an informed and focused approach to their thesis writing endeavors.

1000 Law Thesis Topics and Ideas

Academic Writing, Editing, Proofreading, And Problem Solving Services

Get 10% off with 24start discount code, browse law thesis topics:, administrative law thesis topics, banking and finance law thesis topics, commercial law thesis topics, competition law thesis topics, constitutional law thesis topics, contract law thesis topics, corporate law thesis topics, criminal law thesis topics, cyber law thesis topics, environmental law thesis topics, european union law thesis topics, family law thesis topics, health law thesis topics, human rights law thesis topics, immigration law thesis topics, intellectual property law thesis topics, international law thesis topics, labor law thesis topics, legal ethics thesis topics, maritime law thesis topics, media law thesis topics, property law thesis topics, public international law thesis topics, sports law thesis topics, tax law thesis topics.

• The impact of administrative reforms on government efficiency in the 21st century.
• Examining the role of public consultation in administrative decision-making processes.
• The effectiveness of ombudsman institutions in resolving public grievances: A comparative study.
• Legal challenges in implementing electronic governance and digitalization of administrative services.
• The influence of political change on administrative law reforms.
• Judicial review of administrative actions: Balancing government discretion and citizen rights.
• The evolution of administrative law under the pressure of emergency health responses (e.g., COVID-19).
• Privacy rights versus state security: Where should the line be drawn in administrative policies?
• The role of administrative law in combating climate change: Case studies from around the world.
• The effectiveness of administrative penalties in regulating corporate behavior.
• Transparency and accountability in public procurement processes.
• Comparative analysis of administrative law systems in federal and unitary states.
• The role of administrative law in shaping public health policies.
• Administrative law and its impact on minority rights protections.
• The challenge of maintaining administrative justice in times of political instability.
• Legal mechanisms for citizen participation in the administrative rule-making process.
• The future of administrative litigation: Trends and predictions.
• Impact of international law on national administrative law procedures.
• Administrative law’s response to socio-economic disparities.
• The use of artificial intelligence in administrative decision-making: Legal and ethical implications.
• Balancing efficiency and fairness in administrative adjudication.
• The role of administrative agencies in environmental conservation.
• Regulatory challenges in the administration of emerging technologies.
• The impact of globalization on national administrative law practices.
• Administrative law as a tool for social reform.
• Corruption and administrative law: Safeguards and pitfalls.
• Administrative discretion and its limits in democratic societies.
• The intersection of administrative law and human rights.
• The administrative burden of tax law enforcement and compliance.
• Public access to information: Evaluating legal frameworks in different jurisdictions.
• The role of whistleblowers in the administrative state: Protection versus persecution.
• Outsourcing government services: Legal ramifications and oversight.
• Legal standards for emergency powers of administrative agencies.
• Administrative law and the management of public lands.
• Challenges in regulatory enforcement against multinational corporations.
• The impact of administrative decisions on small businesses.
• Legal remedies for administrative injustices: Are they sufficient?
• The influence of lobbying on administrative rule-making.
• The role of the judiciary in shaping administrative law.
• The future of public administration: Predicting changes in law and policy.
• The legal implications of blockchain technology in banking and finance.
• An analysis of regulatory approaches to cryptocurrency in major global economies.
• The role of law in preventing financial crises: Lessons learned from past financial collapses.
• Legal challenges in implementing digital currencies by central banks.
• Consumer protection in online banking: Evaluating current legal frameworks.
• The impact of Brexit on the banking and finance laws in the UK and EU.
• Regulatory responses to financial innovation: Balancing innovation and consumer protection.
• Legal strategies for combating money laundering in the international banking sector.
• The influence of international sanctions on banking and financial transactions.
• Legal issues surrounding the securitization of assets.
• The role of legal frameworks in fostering sustainable banking practices.
• The enforcement of banking regulations against systemic risk.
• Legal aspects of banking insolvencies and their impact on the global economy.
• The evolution of consumer credit laws and their impact on the banking industry.
• The effectiveness of anti-corruption regulations in the banking sector.
• Legal considerations in the management of cross-border banking operations.
• The regulation of shadow banking systems and their legal implications.
• Legal challenges faced by fintech companies in the banking sector.
• The role of law in addressing disparities in access to banking services.
• Legal frameworks for banking privacy and data protection in the age of digital banking.
• The impact of artificial intelligence on regulatory compliance in banking.
• Legal aspects of risk management in banking: Current practices and future directions.
• The legalities of banking for high-risk clients: Balancing business and regulatory requirements.
• The enforcement of Basel III standards in developing countries.
• Legal issues related to bank mergers and acquisitions.
• The regulation of international investment and its impact on banking laws.
• Legal challenges in microfinancing: Protecting both lenders and borrowers.
• The implications of non-performing loans on banking law and policy.
• Banking dispute resolution: The effectiveness of arbitration and mediation.
• The legal framework for Islamic banking and finance: Comparison with Western banking laws.
• The role of the judiciary in shaping banking laws and practices.
• The future of banking regulation: Predicting changes post-global pandemic.
• Legal frameworks governing venture capital and its role in economic development.
• Regulatory challenges in mobile and electronic payment systems.
• The impact of interest rate regulations on banking profitability and lending practices.
• Legal approaches to combat insider trading in the banking sector.
• The role of legal systems in shaping corporate governance in banks.
• Legal provisions for the protection of minority shareholders in banks.
• Regulatory frameworks for derivatives: Balancing risk and innovation.
• The role of international law in governing global banking practices.
• The impact of global trade agreements on domestic commercial laws.
• Legal challenges in e-commerce: Consumer rights and seller responsibilities.
• The enforcement of international commercial contracts: Comparative legal analysis.
• Intellectual property rights in the digital age: Protecting innovations while fostering competition.
• Legal frameworks for cross-border e-commerce transactions.
• The role of commercial law in supporting small and medium enterprises (SMEs).
• Arbitration vs. court litigation: Choosing the right path for commercial disputes.
• The evolution of commercial law with the rise of artificial intelligence and robotics.
• Legal strategies for protecting brand identity and trademarks internationally.
• The impact of anti-monopoly laws on corporate mergers and acquisitions.
• Legal aspects of supply chain management and logistics.
• The enforcement of non-disclosure agreements in international business deals.
• Consumer protection laws in the context of misleading advertising and sales practices.
• The role of commercial law in regulating online payment systems.
• Contract law for the modern entrepreneur: Navigating contracts in a digital world.
• The influence of cultural differences on international commercial negotiations and laws.
• Legal challenges in franchising: Protecting franchisors and franchisees.
• Commercial leasing disputes and the law: Trends and resolutions.
• Corporate social responsibility and commercial law: Legal obligations and implications.
• Legal implications of Brexit for European trade and commercial law.
• Regulation of commercial drones: Privacy, safety, and commercial uses.
• Legal issues surrounding the gig economy and contract employment.
• Protecting consumer data in commercial transactions: Legal obligations and challenges.
• Legal aspects of marketing and advertising in digital media.
• Impact of environmental laws on commercial practices: From compliance to competitive advantage.
• Legal remedies in commercial law: Exploring efficient dispute resolution mechanisms.
• Insolvency and bankruptcy: Legal strategies for rescuing troubled businesses.
• The legal consequences of business espionage: Protecting commercial interests.
• The role of trademarks in building and maintaining brand value.
• Corporate governance in the modern corporation: Legal frameworks and challenges.
• Comparative analysis of commercial guaranties across different legal systems.
• Legal issues in the export and import of goods: Navigating international regulations.
• The regulation of commercial insurance: Balancing stakeholder interests.
• Legal challenges in real estate development and commercial property investments.
• Impact of digital currencies on commercial transactions.
• International taxation and its impact on multinational commercial operations.
• The regulation of unfair competition in a globalized market.
• Legal strategies for managing commercial risks in unstable economies.
• The role of law in innovative financing methods like crowdfunding and peer-to-peer lending.
• Contractual liability and risk management in international commercial projects.
• The impact of digital market platforms on traditional competition law frameworks.
• Analyzing the effectiveness of antitrust laws against tech giants in the digital economy.
• Comparative analysis of competition law enforcement in the US and EU.
• The role of competition law in regulating mergers and acquisitions in the healthcare sector.
• Challenges in applying competition law to free-of-charge services on the internet.
• Legal strategies for combating price fixing in international markets.
• The impact of Brexit on competition law and policy in the UK.
• Competition law and its role in managing market dominance by multinational corporations.
• Evaluating the need for reform in competition law to adapt to global economic changes.
• The enforcement of competition law against patent abuse and anti-competitive practices in the pharmaceutical industry.
• The role of competition authorities in promoting innovation through enforcement policies.
• Analyzing the intersection of competition law and consumer protection.
• The effectiveness of leniency programs in uncovering and deterring cartel activity.
• Impact of competition law on small and medium-sized enterprises: Protection or hindrance?
• The influence of artificial intelligence on competitive practices and regulatory responses.
• The role of economic evidence in competition law litigation.
• Globalization and its effects on national competition law policies.
• The challenges of enforcing competition law in digital advertising markets.
• Network effects and lock-in as challenges for competition law in the IT industry.
• Legal remedies for anti-competitive practices in the energy sector.
• The dynamics of competition law in developing economies: Case studies from Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
• The implications of cross-border competition law enforcement in multinational operations.
• Consumer welfare and the debate over the goals of competition law.
• The regulation of joint ventures under competition law: A critical analysis.
• Vertical restraints and competition law: Balancing market efficiencies and anti-competitive concerns.
• The role of competition law in sports, media, and entertainment industries.
• Competition law and policy in the era of globalization: Protecting domestic industries while encouraging innovation.
• The future of competition law enforcement in a post-pandemic world.
• The effectiveness of competition law in curbing monopolistic practices in the telecom industry.
• Balancing national security interests and competition law.
• The role of whistle-blowers in competition law enforcement.
• Assessing the impact of public sector monopolies on competition law.
• Competition law as a tool for economic development in emerging markets.
• The challenges of proving intent in anti-competitive practices.
• The application of competition law to the agricultural sector and its impact on food security.
• Reform proposals for more effective competition law enforcement.
• The role of state aid and subsidies in competition law.
• Competition law implications of blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies.
• The balance between intellectual property rights and competition law.
• The use of machine learning algorithms in predicting and analyzing market competition.
• The evolving concept of constitutionalism in the digital age.
• Analysis of constitutional changes in response to global pandemics.
• The role of the judiciary in upholding constitutional rights in times of political turmoil.
• Comparative study of free speech protections under different constitutional regimes.
• The impact of migration crises on constitutional law frameworks in the EU.
• Gender equality and constitutional law: Examining legal reforms across the globe.
• The constitutional implications of Brexit for the United Kingdom.
• Federalism and the balance of power: Lessons from the United States Constitution.
• The enforceability of social and economic rights under constitutional law.
• The influence of international human rights treaties on national constitutional laws.
• The right to privacy in the era of mass surveillance: A constitutional perspective.
• The role of constitutions in managing ethnic and religious diversity.
• Constitutional law and the challenge of climate change.
• The legality of emergency powers under constitutional law in various countries.
• The impact of artificial intelligence on constitutional rights and liberties.
• Same-sex marriage and constitutional law: A comparative analysis.
• The constitutionality of the death penalty in the 21st century.
• Age and constitutional law: The rights and protections afforded to the elderly.
• Constitutional reforms and the evolution of democratic governance in Africa.
• The role of the constitution in combating corruption within government institutions.
• Gun control and constitutional rights: A critical analysis.
• The balance between national security and individual freedoms in constitutional law.
• The effectiveness of constitutional courts in protecting minority rights.
• The constitution as a living document: Interpretation and change in judicial review.
• Assessing the constitutional frameworks for federal and unitary states.
• The impact of populism on constitutional democracy.
• Constitutional law in the face of technological advancements: Regulation and rights.
• The role of constitutional amendments in shaping political stability.
• Analyzing the separation of powers in newly formed governments.
• Indigenous rights and constitutional law: Case studies from North America and Australasia.
• Constitutional law and public health: Legal responses to health emergencies.
• The constitutionality of affirmative action policies in education and employment.
• Political party bans and democracy: A constitutional analysis.
• The role of the constitution in economic policy and regulation.
• Constitutional challenges to the regulation of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technologies.
• The implications of judicial activism for constitutional law.
• The constitution and the right to a clean and healthy environment.
• The intersection of constitutional law and international diplomacy.
• Protection of children’s rights within constitutional frameworks.
• The future of constitutional governance in virtual and augmented reality environments.
• The enforceability of electronic contracts in international commerce.
• The impact of AI on contract formation and enforcement.
• Comparative analysis of contract law remedies in different jurisdictions.
• The legal implications of smart contracts in blockchain technologies.
• The role of contract law in regulating freelance and gig economy work.
• The challenges of cross-border contract enforcement in the digital age.
• Contractual risk management in international construction projects.
• The doctrine of frustration in contract law: Contemporary issues and challenges.
• Consumer protection in online contracts: A critical analysis.
• The influence of cultural differences on international commercial contracts.
• Force majeure clauses in contracts during global crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
• The evolution of contract law with technological advancements.
• Legal issues surrounding the termination of contracts: A comparative study.
• The role of contract law in sustainable development and environmental protection.
• Misrepresentation in contract law: A review of current legal standards.
• The legal status of verbal agreements in a digital world.
• Contractual obligations and rights in the sharing economy.
• The interplay between contract law and intellectual property rights.
• The effectiveness of liquidated damages clauses in commercial contracts.
• Unconscionability in contract law: Protecting the vulnerable party.
• The enforcement of non-compete clauses in employment contracts.
• The legality of automatic renewal clauses in consumer and business contracts.
• The impact of contract law on consumer rights in financial agreements.
• Standard form contracts and the imbalance of power between parties.
• The role of mediation in resolving contract disputes.
• Contract law in the sale of goods: The challenges of e-commerce.
• The future of contract law in regulating virtual and augmented reality transactions.
• The concept of ‘good faith’ in contract negotiation and execution.
• Legal implications of contract breaches in international trade.
• The application of contract law in healthcare service agreements.
• The enforceability of penalty clauses in different legal systems.
• Contract modifications: Legal implications of changing terms mid-agreement.
• The legal challenges of subscription-based contract models.
• Contract law and data protection: Obligations and liabilities.
• The impact of insolvency on contractual relationships.
• The regulation of crowdfunding agreements under contract law.
• Consumer contracts and the right to withdraw in the digital marketplace.
• Ethical considerations in contract law: Duties beyond the written document.
• The use of contract law in combating human rights violations.
• The effectiveness of international conventions in harmonizing contract law across borders.
• Corporate governance and its impact on shareholder activism.
• The role of corporate social responsibility in modern business practices.
• Legal strategies to combat corporate fraud and enhance transparency.
• Comparative analysis of corporate bankruptcy laws and their effectiveness.
• The influence of global corporate regulations on multinational mergers and acquisitions.
• The impact of environmental regulations on corporate operations and compliance.
• Legal challenges and opportunities in corporate restructuring processes.
• Corporate liability for human rights violations in international operations.
• The effectiveness of anti-money laundering laws in the corporate sector.
• The role of ethics in corporate law: How legal frameworks shape business morality.
• The impact of technology on corporate governance: Blockchain and beyond.
• Legal aspects of venture capital funding in startups and SMEs.
• Corporate law in the digital age: Challenges and opportunities for digital enterprises.
• The role of minority shareholders in influencing corporate decisions.
• Legal frameworks for corporate whistleblowing and the protection of whistleblowers.
• Corporate insolvency procedures: A comparative study of the US and EU frameworks.
• The evolution of corporate personhood and its legal implications.
• The role of stock exchanges in enforcing corporate law.
• Legal issues surrounding corporate espionage and competitive intelligence gathering.
• Comparative analysis of corporate governance codes across different jurisdictions.
• Legal frameworks for handling conflicts of interest in corporate boards.
• The regulation of corporate political contributions and lobbying activities.
• Corporate taxation laws and their impact on international business strategies.
• The regulation of joint ventures under corporate law: Balancing interests and sharing control.
• The challenges of maintaining corporate compliance in a global market.
• Corporate law and the protection of intellectual property rights.
• The effectiveness of corporate penalties in deterring corporate misconduct.
• Legal aspects of employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs).
• Corporate law implications for artificial intelligence integration in business practices.
• The legal challenges of managing cyber risk in corporate entities.
• Corporate law’s role in managing and disclosing financial risks.
• The impact of corporate law on the governance of nonprofit organizations.
• Legal responsibilities and liabilities of corporate directors and officers.
• The role of international treaties in shaping corporate law practices.
• Corporate law and its influence on strategic business alliances and partnerships.
• Legal aspects of sustainable investment in corporate decision-making.
• The regulation of private equity and hedge funds under corporate law.
• Legal challenges in corporate branding and marketing strategies.
• Corporate law considerations in the management of supply chains.
• The impact of corporate law on mergers and acquisitions in emerging markets.
• The impact of forensic science advancements on criminal law and procedure.
• Analyzing the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs in reducing recidivism rates.
• The role of mental health assessments in criminal sentencing.
• Legal challenges in prosecuting international cybercrimes.
• The evolution of laws against domestic violence and their enforcement.
• The effectiveness of death penalty deterrence: A critical analysis.
• Legal frameworks for combating human trafficking: Global perspectives.
• The influence of social media on criminal behavior and law enforcement.
• Racial disparities in criminal sentencing: Causes and legal remedies.
• The application of criminal law to acts of terrorism: Balancing security and civil liberties.
• Juvenile justice: Reforming the approach to underage offenders.
• The legal implications of wrongful convictions: Prevention and compensation.
• Drug policy reform: The shift from criminalization to harm reduction.
• The impact of body-worn cameras on policing and criminal justice.
• Legal and ethical considerations in the use of DNA evidence in criminal trials.
• The role of the insanity defense in criminal law: A comparative study.
• Legal strategies for addressing gang violence within urban communities.
• The criminalization of poverty and its impact on justice.
• Analyzing the effectiveness of sexual assault legislation.
• The role of public opinion in shaping criminal law reforms.
• Legal approaches to combating corruption and white-collar crime.
• The challenges of protecting victims’ rights in criminal proceedings.
• The impact of immigration laws on criminal justice practices.
• Ethical and legal issues in the use of undercover policing tactics.
• The effects of legalizing marijuana on criminal justice systems.
• The role of international cooperation in combating cross-border criminal activities.
• The use of restorative justice practices in criminal law systems.
• Challenges in the enforcement of wildlife protection laws.
• Legal issues surrounding the use of force by law enforcement.
• The implications of emerging technologies for criminal law and justice.
• Legal definitions of terrorism and their impact on law enforcement.
• The impact of social movements on criminal law reform.
• Addressing elder abuse through criminal statutes and protections.
• The role of forensic psychology in criminal investigations.
• Legal consequences of financial crimes in different jurisdictions.
• Challenges in prosecuting war crimes and genocide.
• The legal aspects of electronic monitoring and surveillance in criminal investigations.
• The implications of international extradition in criminal law.
• Addressing the challenges of witness protection programs.
• The intersection of criminal law and human rights in detention and interrogation.
• Legal frameworks for data protection and privacy in the digital age.
• The implications of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on global internet governance.
• Cybersecurity laws: National strategies and international cooperation.
• The legality of government surveillance programs under international cyber law.
• Intellectual property challenges in the era of digital media.
• Legal issues surrounding the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning.
• The enforcement of cybercrimes: Challenges and strategies.
• Rights and responsibilities of individuals and corporations under cyber law.
• Cyberbullying and online harassment: Legal remedies and limitations.
• The role of cyber law in managing online misinformation and fake news.
• Legal challenges in the regulation of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology.
• The impact of cloud computing on privacy and data security legal frameworks.
• Legal aspects of e-commerce: Consumer protection online.
• The digital divide: Legal implications of unequal access to technology.
• Regulation of digital advertising and its implications for privacy.
• Jurisdictional issues in cyberspace: Determining liability in a borderless environment.
• Legal considerations for Internet of Things (IoT) devices in consumer and industrial applications.
• The role of anonymity in the internet: Balancing privacy and accountability.
• Cyber law and its impact on the creative industries: Copyright issues in digital content creation.
• Legal frameworks for combating online trade of illegal goods and services.
• The enforcement of digital rights management (DRM) technologies.
• Cyber law and online education: Intellectual property and privacy concerns.
• The regulation of social media platforms under cyber law.
• Legal remedies for victims of online identity theft.
• The implications of autonomous vehicles on cyber law.
• Legal strategies to address online child exploitation and protection.
• The impact of telemedicine on health law and cyber law.
• Challenges in enforcing online contracts and resolving disputes.
• Cyber law in the context of national security: Balancing civil liberties.
• Legal frameworks for software development and liability issues.
• The influence of international treaties on national cyber law policies.
• Legal aspects of cyber espionage and state-sponsored cyber attacks.
• Ethical hacking: Legal boundaries and implications.
• The regulation of online gaming: Consumer protection and cyber law.
• Cyber law and digital accessibility: Rights of differently-abled persons.
• Legal implications of biometric data processing in cyber law.
• The future of robotic automation and law: Ethical and legal considerations.
• The role of cyber law in the governance of digital health records.
• Managing online content: Legal issues around censorship and freedom of expression.
• Cyber law implications for digital banking and fintech.
• The effectiveness of international agreements in combating climate change.
• Legal strategies for biodiversity conservation in international and domestic contexts.
• The impact of environmental law on sustainable urban development.
• Comparative analysis of water rights and regulations across different jurisdictions.
• Legal mechanisms for controlling plastic pollution in marine environments.
• The role of environmental impact assessments in promoting sustainable projects.
• Legal and regulatory challenges of renewable energy implementation.
• The effectiveness of air quality laws in reducing urban smog.
• Environmental justice and its impact on marginalized communities.
• The role of the judiciary in shaping environmental policy.
• Corporate accountability for environmental degradation: Legal remedies.
• The regulation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their environmental impact.
• Legal frameworks for the protection of endangered species and habitats.
• Climate refugees: Legal challenges and protections under international law.
• The intersection of environmental law and human rights.
• Challenges in enforcing environmental laws against multinational corporations.
• Legal aspects of carbon trading and emissions reduction schemes.
• The impact of agricultural practices on environmental law and policy.
• Mining and environmental degradation: Legal responses and remedies.
• The use of environmental law to combat deforestation.
• Legal issues related to energy storage and its environmental impacts.
• Regulatory challenges of nanotechnology and environmental health.
• Legal strategies for water management in drought-prone areas.
• The regulation of noise pollution in urban environments.
• The role of public participation in environmental decision-making.
• Legal frameworks for dealing with hazardous waste and its disposal.
• Environmental law as a tool for green building and construction practices.
• Legal challenges in protecting wetlands through environmental laws.
• The enforceability of international environmental law.
• The impact of environmental laws on traditional land use and indigenous rights.
• The role of local governments in environmental governance.
• Environmental law and the regulation of pesticides and chemicals.
• Legal responses to environmental disasters and recovery processes.
• The implications of deep-sea mining for environmental law.
• The role of environmental NGOs in shaping law and policy.
• Legal tools for the conservation of marine biodiversity.
• Challenges of integrating environmental concerns in corporate governance.
• Legal implications of artificial intelligence in environmental monitoring.
• The role of litigation in enforcing environmental norms and standards.
• Trends and challenges in the enforcement of transboundary environmental laws.
• The impact of EU law on national sovereignty of member states.
• Brexit and its legal implications for both the UK and EU.
• The effectiveness of the EU’s data protection regulation (GDPR) in a global context.
• The role of the European Court of Justice in shaping EU policies.
• Legal analysis of the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and its impacts.
• The EU’s approach to antitrust and competition law enforcement.
• Human rights protection under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.
• Legal challenges in the implementation of the EU’s Digital Single Market.
• The EU’s role in international trade: Legal frameworks and challenges.
• The influence of EU environmental law on member state legislation.
• Consumer protection laws in the EU and their effectiveness.
• Legal mechanisms of the EU banking union and capital markets union.
• The regulation of pharmaceuticals and healthcare within the EU.
• Migration and asylum laws in the EU: Challenges and responses.
• The role of lobbying in EU lawmaking processes.
• Legal aspects of the EU’s energy policy and its impact on sustainability.
• The enforcement of intellectual property rights within the EU.
• The EU’s legal framework for dealing with cyber security threats.
• Analysis of EU labor laws and their impact on worker mobility.
• Legal bases for EU sanctions and their impact on international relations.
• The EU’s legal strategies against terrorism and organized crime.
• The effectiveness of the EU’s regional development policies.
• Legal and ethical issues in AI regulation within the EU.
• The EU’s approach to regulating blockchain technology.
• The challenges of EU enlargement: Case studies of recent accession countries.
• The role of the EU in global environmental governance.
• The impact of EU laws on the rights of indigenous populations.
• Legal analysis of EU sports law and policy.
• The EU’s framework for consumer digital privacy and security.
• The regulation of biotechnology in agriculture within the EU.
• EU tax law and its implications for global corporations.
• The role of the European Ombudsman in ensuring administrative justice.
• The influence of EU copyright law on digital media and entertainment.
• Legal frameworks for public procurement in the EU.
• The impact of EU maritime law on international shipping and trade.
• EU chemical regulations: REACH and its global implications.
• Legal issues surrounding the EU’s external border control policies.
• The EU’s role in shaping international aviation law.
• The impact of EU law on public health policy and regulation.
• The future of the EU’s constitutional framework and its legal challenges.
• The impact of cultural diversity on family law practices.
• Legal challenges in the enforcement of international child custody agreements.
• The effectiveness of mediation in resolving family disputes.
• The evolution of child support laws in response to changing societal norms.
• Comparative analysis of divorce laws across different jurisdictions.
• Legal implications of surrogacy: Rights of the child, surrogate, and intended parents.
• The impact of social media on family relationships and legal proceedings.
• Legal rights of cohabiting couples: A comparative study.
• The role of family law in addressing domestic violence.
• The legal recognition of LGBTQ+ families in different countries.
• The effect of parental alienation on child custody decisions.
• Adoption laws and the challenges of cross-border adoption.
• Legal issues surrounding elder care and guardianship.
• The role of genetic testing in family law (paternity disputes, inheritance rights).
• The impact of immigration laws on family unification policies.
• The rights of children with disabilities in family law proceedings.
• The influence of religious beliefs on family law decisions.
• The legal challenges of blended families: Rights and responsibilities.
• The role of children’s rights in family law: Voice and protection.
• Legal frameworks for dealing with family assets and financial disputes.
• The impact of addiction (substance abuse, gambling) on family dynamics and legal outcomes.
• The enforcement of prenuptial agreements: A critical analysis.
• Legal responses to teenage pregnancy and parental responsibilities.
• The effect of military service on family law issues (divorce, custody).
• The challenges of maintaining privacy in family law cases.
• The impact of mental health on parental rights and child custody.
• The role of the state in family planning and reproductive rights.
• Comparative study of same-sex marriage laws before and after legalization.
• The evolution of father’s rights in family law.
• The legal complexities of artificial reproductive technologies.
• Family law and its role in preventing child marriages.
• The impact of economic downturns on family law issues (alimony, child support).
• Legal strategies for protecting domestic violence survivors through family law.
• The role of international conventions in shaping family law.
• Gender biases in family law: A critical analysis.
• The regulation of family law advertising and its ethical implications.
• The influence of international human rights law on family law.
• The challenges of transnational families in navigating family law.
• Legal and ethical issues in the involuntary sterilization of disabled individuals.
• The future of family law: Predicting changes in legislation and practice.
• The legal implications of telemedicine and remote healthcare services.
• Regulation and liability of artificial intelligence in healthcare.
• The impact of healthcare laws on patient privacy and data protection.
• Legal issues surrounding the right to die: Euthanasia and assisted suicide.
• The enforcement of mental health legislation and patient rights.
• Legal challenges in the regulation of pharmaceuticals and medical devices.
• The role of health law in managing infectious disease outbreaks, such as COVID-19.
• Ethical and legal considerations of genetic testing and genome editing.
• Comparative analysis of health insurance models and their legal implications.
• The impact of health law on underserved and marginalized populations.
• Legal aspects of medical malpractice and healthcare provider liability.
• The regulation of stem cell research and therapy.
• Legal frameworks for addressing obesity as a public health issue.
• The role of law in combating healthcare fraud and abuse.
• Ethical issues in the allocation of scarce medical resources.
• Legal challenges in child and adolescent health care consent.
• The influence of global health initiatives on national health law policies.
• Legal issues related to the development and use of biobanks.
• Health law and its impact on emergency medical response and preparedness.
• Legal and ethical challenges in the treatment of psychiatric patients.
• The rights of patients in clinical trials: Informed consent and beyond.
• The regulation of medical marijuana and its impact on healthcare systems.
• Health law’s role in addressing non-communicable diseases.
• Legal strategies to combat antimicrobial resistance.
• The legal implications of sports medicine and athlete care.
• The protection of vulnerable groups in healthcare settings.
• Legal frameworks governing organ donation and transplantation.
• The role of health law in reproductive rights and technologies.
• The impact of bioethics on health law policy and practice.
• Legal considerations of global health diplomacy and international health law.
• The regulation of alternative and complementary medicine.
• Legal challenges in providing healthcare in rural and remote areas.
• The impact of nutrition and food law on public health.
• Legal responses to aging populations and elder care.
• Health law and its impact on vaccination policies and enforcement.
• The legal implications of patient literacy and health education.
• Regulatory challenges in health information technology and mobile health apps.
• Legal and ethical issues in cosmetic and elective surgery.
• The role of whistleblowers in improving healthcare quality and safety.
• The legal implications of healthcare marketing and consumer protection.
• The impact of international human rights conventions on domestic laws.
• The role of the International Criminal Court in enforcing human rights standards.
• Legal remedies for victims of war crimes and genocide.
• The enforcement of human rights in areas of conflict and post-conflict societies.
• The legal implications of refugee and asylum seeker policies.
• The right to freedom of expression in the digital age.
• Human rights challenges in the context of global migration.
• Legal protections against discrimination based on gender, race, and sexuality.
• The impact of cultural practices on the enforcement of human rights.
• Legal frameworks for protecting children in armed conflicts.
• The role of non-governmental organizations in promoting and protecting human rights.
• Human rights and environmental law: the right to a healthy environment.
• The legal aspects of economic, social, and cultural rights.
• Protecting the rights of indigenous peoples: international and domestic approaches.
• Human rights implications of counter-terrorism laws and practices.
• The role of national human rights institutions in promoting human rights.
• Legal challenges in combating human trafficking and modern slavery.
• The rights of disabled individuals under international human rights law.
• Legal strategies to combat racial and ethnic profiling.
• The protection of human rights defenders in hostile environments.
• The impact of globalization on labor rights and working conditions.
• The role of the media in promoting human rights awareness and protection.
• Human rights law and its intersection with gender-based violence.
• The right to education and legal measures to enforce it.
• Legal responses to the crisis of statelessness.
• Human rights issues surrounding the management of natural disasters.
• The role of human rights law in regulating private military and security companies.
• The right to privacy in the surveillance era.
• Legal measures to address economic inequality and ensure human rights.
• The challenge of protecting human rights in authoritarian regimes.
• Human rights in medical law: issues of consent and autonomy.
• The right to food and water as fundamental human rights.
• Legal frameworks for the rights of the elderly in different countries.
• The role of human rights law in addressing issues of domestic violence.
• Human rights considerations in the development and enforcement of immigration laws.
• The impact of intellectual property laws on access to medicines.
• The enforcement of the rights of LGBT individuals globally.
• Human rights law and its application to internet governance.
• The legal rights of prisoners and the conditions of detention.
• The role of human rights in shaping international trade and investment policies.
• The impact of immigration laws on national security in various countries.
• Comparative analysis of asylum procedures across different jurisdictions.
• The role of immigration law in shaping multicultural societies.
• Legal challenges faced by refugees and asylum seekers during resettlement.
• The effectiveness of skilled migrant programs and their impact on the economy.
• Legal and ethical considerations in the detention of immigrants.
• The influence of international human rights law on national immigration policies.
• The impact of Brexit on immigration laws in the UK and the EU.
• The role of international agreements in managing migration crises.
• Legal strategies to combat human trafficking within the immigration system.
• The rights of undocumented immigrants and access to legal aid.
• The enforcement of immigration laws and the rights of migrant workers.
• The legal implications of family reunification policies.
• Analysis of deportation procedures and their compliance with international law.
• The effect of climate change on migration patterns and immigration law.
• Legal measures to protect immigrants against labor exploitation.
• The role of local governments in immigration enforcement.
• The legal aspects of border management technologies.
• Immigration law and its impact on education for immigrant children.
• The challenges of integrating immigrants into host societies legally.
• Comparative study of investor immigration programs.
• The effects of cultural bias in immigration law enforcement.
• Legal remedies for immigrants subjected to discrimination.
• The intersection of immigration law and public health policies.
• The legal consequences of overstaying visas on future immigration applications.
• The role of consulates and embassies in the immigration process.
• Legal frameworks for addressing statelessness in the context of immigration.
• Immigration law’s response to temporary protection statuses.
• The impact of international sports events on immigration laws and policies.
• The role of non-governmental organizations in shaping immigration law.
• The use of biometric data in immigration control.
• Legal perspectives on the economic impact of immigration.
• Challenges in protecting the rights of elderly immigrants.
• The influence of immigration on national identity and cultural policies.
• Legal implications of global demographic shifts on immigration policies.
• The regulation of international student visas and their impact on higher education.
• Legal challenges faced by immigrants in accessing healthcare services.
• The dynamics of urban immigration and legal integration strategies.
• Legal issues concerning expatriation and renunciation of citizenship.
• The future of immigration law in the face of global political changes.
• The impact of artificial intelligence on copyright and patent law.
• Comparative analysis of trademark laws in the digital age across different jurisdictions.
• The role of intellectual property rights in fostering or hindering innovation.
• Legal challenges in the protection of software under intellectual property law.
• The enforcement of intellectual property rights in online platforms.
• The balance between intellectual property rights and the public domain.
• The implications of 3D printing technologies on intellectual property rights.
• Intellectual property issues in the music industry: Streaming and digital rights.
• The effectiveness of international intellectual property treaties like WIPO and TRIPS.
• Intellectual property strategies for biotechnological inventions.
• The role of patents in the pharmaceutical industry and access to medicine.
• The impact of intellectual property rights on traditional knowledge and cultural expressions.
• Copyright law and its adaptability to new forms of media like virtual reality.
• The intersection of intellectual property law and competition law.
• Legal frameworks for managing intellectual property in joint ventures and collaborations.
• The role of intellectual property in the fashion industry and combating counterfeits.
• Trademark dilution: A comparative study between the U.S. and EU approaches.
• Legal challenges associated with celebrity rights and their management under IP law.
• Intellectual property rights and their impact on small and medium-sized enterprises.
• The protection of design rights in industrial models and drawings.
• Intellectual property and corporate governance: Policy, compliance, and enforcement.
• The challenges of enforcing intellectual property rights in the global south.
• The evolution of copyright law in protecting digital ebooks and publications.
• Intellectual property law in the advertising industry: Challenges and perspectives.
• Ethical considerations in intellectual property law.
• The role of intellectual property in the development of artificial organs and bioprinting.
• Challenges in patenting genetic material and the moral implications thereof.
• Intellectual property considerations in cross-border mergers and acquisitions.
• Intellectual property rights in the context of augmented reality technologies.
• The role of intellectual property in the semiconductor industry.
• The impact of open-source licensing on intellectual property law.
• Legal issues surrounding the protection of data and databases under intellectual property law.
• The role of intellectual property in sports marketing and merchandise.
• Intellectual property issues in cloud computing and data storage.
• Copyright disputes in the film industry: Case studies and legal insights.
• The protection of plant varieties and agricultural innovation under IP law.
• Intellectual property and its role in promoting or restricting access to educational materials.
• Trade secrets law: Comparative approaches and key challenges.
• The impact of geographical indications on local economies and protection strategies.
• Intellectual property law and its enforcement in the age of the internet of things.
• The effectiveness of the United Nations in resolving international disputes.
• The role of international law in governing the use of force by states.
• Legal frameworks for international cooperation in combating climate change.
• The implications of sovereignty and state responsibility in international law.
• The enforcement of international human rights law in conflict zones.
• Legal strategies for addressing international cybercrime and digital warfare.
• The regulation of international trade under the World Trade Organization (WTO).
• Legal challenges in the management of global migration and refugee crises.
• The impact of international sanctions on global diplomacy and law.
• The legal status and rights of stateless individuals under international law.
• The application of international law in the Antarctic and other common areas.
• The protection of cultural heritage in times of war under international law.
• The role of international courts and tribunals in enforcing maritime law.
• Comparative analysis of regional human rights mechanisms (e.g., European, African, American).
• The jurisdiction and reach of the International Criminal Court (ICC).
• The legal implications of territorial disputes on international relations.
• The influence of international law on national legislation regarding environmental protection.
• The legal treatment of indigenous peoples’ rights at the international level.
• The development of international norms for corporate social responsibility.
• Legal and ethical considerations in international medical research and healthcare.
• The regulation of international finance and its impact on economic development.
• The challenges of enforcing intellectual property rights at the international level.
• The legal frameworks governing the use and regulation of drones in international airspace.
• The impact of bilateral and multilateral treaties on domestic legal systems.
• International legal standards for the treatment of prisoners and detainees.
• The role of diplomatic immunity in contemporary international law.
• Legal issues surrounding international sports events and the governance of international sports bodies.
• The use of international law in combating terrorism and protecting national security.
• Legal measures against international trafficking of drugs, arms, and human beings.
• The role of non-state actors in international law (NGOs, multinational corporations, etc.).
• Legal considerations in the preservation of biodiversity under international conventions.
• The international legal ramifications of artificial islands and reclaimed territories.
• The dynamics of negotiation and implementation of international peace treaties.
• The intersection of international law and global public health policies.
• The legal challenges in regulating outer space activities and celestial bodies.
• The enforcement of international labor standards and their impact on global trade.
• Legal implications of global electronic surveillance by states.
• The regulation of international nuclear energy and nuclear weapons.
• The role of international law in addressing issues of global poverty and inequality.
• The future of international law in a multipolar world order.
• The impact of globalization on labor rights and standards.
• Legal challenges and protections for gig economy workers.
• Comparative analysis of minimum wage laws across different jurisdictions.
• The role of trade unions in modern labor markets.
• Legal frameworks governing telecommuting and remote work arrangements.
• Enforcement of anti-discrimination laws in the workplace.
• The impact of artificial intelligence and automation on labor laws.
• Legal protections for migrant workers in host countries.
• The effectiveness of occupational safety and health regulations.
• The role of labor law in managing economic crises and labor market shocks.
• Gender equality in the workplace: Assessing legal approaches.
• The regulation of child labor in developing economies.
• Legal implications of employee surveillance practices.
• Rights and legal protections for part-time, temporary, and seasonal workers.
• Collective bargaining challenges in the public sector.
• The legal status of unpaid internships and volunteer work.
• Legal responses to workplace bullying and psychological harassment.
• The enforceability of non-compete clauses in employment contracts.
• Legal issues related to employee benefits and pensions.
• The impact of labor laws on small businesses and startups.
• Labor rights in the informal economy.
• Legal strategies for conflict resolution in labor disputes.
• The influence of international labor standards on national laws.
• The role of labor law in promoting sustainable employment practices.
• The effectiveness of mediation and arbitration in labor disputes.
• Legal protections against wrongful termination.
• The challenges of enforcing fair labor practices across multinational corporations.
• The rights of disabled workers under labor law.
• Labor law and its adaptation to the changing nature of work.
• The regulation of labor in industries with high risk of exploitation (e.g., textiles, mining).
• The impact of labor law on industrial relations in the healthcare sector.
• Legal aspects of wage theft and its enforcement.
• Labor laws related to shift work and overtime regulations.
• The legal consequences of labor strikes and lockouts.
• Employee privacy rights versus employer’s right to monitor.
• The role of labor law in economic development and poverty reduction.
• Legal frameworks for employee representation in corporate governance.
• The challenges of labor law compliance in the retail sector.
• Labor law issues in the entertainment and sports industries.
• Future trends in labor law: Anticipating changes in legislation and workplace norms.
• The ethical implications of attorney-client confidentiality.
• Ethical challenges in pro bono legal work.
• The role of personal morality in legal judgments.
• Ethical dilemmas faced by defense attorneys in criminal cases.
• The influence of ethics on legal decision-making processes.
• Conflicts of interest in legal practice: Identification and management.
• Ethical considerations in legal advertising and client solicitation.
• The impact of technology on ethical practices in law.
• Ethical issues in the representation of minors and incapacitated clients.
• The enforcement of ethical standards in the judiciary.
• Ethical challenges in corporate legal departments.
• The ethics of legal outsourcing and the use of non-lawyers.
• Ethical considerations in mediation and alternative dispute resolution.
• The implications of ethical misconduct on legal careers.
• The duty of lawyers to the court vs. client loyalty.
• Ethical issues in cross-border legal practices.
• The responsibility of lawyers in preventing money laundering.
• The ethical dimensions of legal education and training.
• The balance between justice and efficiency in legal ethics.
• Ethical considerations in the use of artificial intelligence in law.
• The ethics of plea bargaining and its impact on justice.
• Ethical issues in the management of legal trusts and estates.
• The role of ethics in environmental law.
• Professional responsibility in managing legal errors and omissions.
• Ethical dilemmas in bankruptcy law.
• The impact of personal ethics on public interest law.
• Ethical considerations in the competitive practices of law firms.
• Ethics in legal research: Ensuring accuracy and integrity.
• The moral obligations of lawyers in promoting human rights.
• The ethics of lawyer activism in political and social movements.
• Challenges of maintaining ethical standards in high-pressure legal environments.
• Ethical issues in the intersection of law and politics.
• The professional ethics of tax lawyers.
• Ethical challenges in the prosecution of complex financial crimes.
• The ethical dimensions of elder law and representation of the elderly.
• The role of moral philosophy in legal ethics curricula.
• Ethical considerations in capital punishment cases.
• Lawyers’ ethical responsibilities in handling classified information.
• The impact of ethical lapses in corporate scandals.
• Future directions in legal ethics: Preparing lawyers for emerging moral challenges.
• The legal frameworks governing international maritime boundaries.
• Liability issues in the event of oil spills and maritime environmental disasters.
• The regulation of piracy under international maritime law.
• Legal challenges in the Arctic maritime routes and territorial claims.
• The effectiveness of maritime safety regulations in preventing accidents at sea.
• Legal aspects of maritime insurance: Coverage, claims, and disputes.
• The role of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in global shipping regulations.
• Arbitration and dispute resolution in international maritime contracts.
• Legal implications of autonomous ships on international maritime law.
• The enforcement of maritime security measures against terrorism.
• Ship registration and flag state responsibilities under international law.
• The impact of climate change on maritime boundaries and fishing rights.
• Legal strategies for combating illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing.
• Maritime lien and ship arrest procedures across different jurisdictions.
• The regulation of crew rights and labor conditions aboard international vessels.
• Comparative analysis of salvage law and the law of finds.
• Legal issues surrounding the abandonment of ships.
• Port state control and its impact on international shipping.
• The rights and legal protection of seafarers under international maritime law.
• The application of maritime law to underwater cultural heritage.
• The challenges of enforcing maritime law in high seas governance.
• Legal frameworks for the management of maritime natural resources.
• Collision regulations and legal liability at sea.
• The impact of technology on maritime law: Satellite and GPS issues.
• The legalities involved in the financing and construction of vessels.
• Legal issues related to maritime transport of hazardous and noxious substances.
• The role of maritime law in the global supply chain and logistics.
• Legal implications of maritime blockades during armed conflict.
• The interface between maritime law and marine biodiversity conservation.
• The legality of maritime security operations by private companies.
• Insurance law as applicable to maritime piracy and armed robbery.
• The regulation of the international cruise industry under maritime law.
• Challenges in maritime jurisdiction: Enforcement and compliance issues.
• Legal aspects of maritime cybersecurity threats and data protection.
• The impact of maritime law on the offshore oil and gas industry.
• Legal issues in maritime search and rescue operations.
• The role of national courts in maritime law enforcement.
• Trends in maritime law: Emerging issues and future directions.
• Maritime law and its adaptation to the shipping of liquefied natural gas (LNG).
• The influence of maritime law on international maritime education and training.
• Legal challenges posed by digital media platforms to traditional copyright laws.
• The impact of social media on privacy rights and legal implications.
• Regulation of fake news and misinformation: Legal frameworks and effectiveness.
• Legal aspects of media censorship in authoritarian regimes.
• The role of media law in protecting journalistic sources and whistleblowers.
• Copyright infringement in the digital age: Streaming services and legal responses.
• Legal standards for advertising and marketing in digital and traditional media.
• The influence of media law on freedom of expression and public discourse.
• The right to be forgotten in the age of the internet: Legal and ethical considerations.
• Defamation law in the digital era: Challenges and new developments.
• Legal responses to cyberbullying and online harassment through media platforms.
• Intellectual property rights in the creation and distribution of digital content.
• Legal issues surrounding user-generated content on online platforms.
• The role of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in regulating broadcast media.
• Legal frameworks for handling sensitive content: Violence, sexuality, and hate speech.
• The regulation of political advertising and its impact on elections.
• The legal implications of artificial intelligence in content creation.
• Data protection laws and their enforcement on media platforms.
• The balance between national security and press freedom.
• Legal strategies for combating deepfake technology and its implications.
• Media ownership laws and their impact on media diversity and pluralism.
• The enforcement of media ethics and law in the age of global digital platforms.
• Legal challenges in cross-border media operations and jurisdictional issues.
• The role of legal frameworks in managing public relations crises.
• The impact of telecommunications law on media dissemination and access.
• Legal considerations for media mergers and acquisitions.
• Regulation of satellite and cable TV in the digital landscape.
• Legal issues related to podcasting and other emerging media formats.
• The protection of minors in media consumption: Legal frameworks and challenges.
• The legal ramifications of media during public health emergencies.
• Accessibility laws related to media content for persons with disabilities.
• The role of the law in combating racial and gender stereotypes in media.
• Media law and consumer protection: Misleading advertisements and consumer rights.
• The impact of GDPR and other privacy regulations on media operations in Europe.
• The legal implications of virtual and augmented reality technologies in media.
• Legal disputes involving music licensing and rights management.
• The challenges of regulating live streaming services under existing media laws.
• Legal issues surrounding the archiving of digital media content.
• The intersection of media law and sports broadcasting rights.
• Future trends in media law: Preparing for new challenges in media and communication technologies.
• Comparative analysis of property rights and land tenure systems across different cultures.
• The impact of eminent domain on property rights and fair compensation.
• Legal challenges in the administration of estates and trusts.
• Intellectual property rights in the digital age: Balancing creators’ rights and public access.
• The role of property law in environmental conservation.
• Legal frameworks governing the leasing and renting of property.
• The evolution of property rights in response to urbanization.
• Property disputes and their resolution: Case studies from land courts.
• The effect of zoning laws on property development and urban planning.
• Legal aspects of real estate transactions and the role of property lawyers.
• Property law and its impact on economic development in emerging markets.
• Legal challenges of property ownership in communal and indigenous lands.
• The influence of property law on agricultural practices and rural development.
• Legal responses to squatting and adverse possession.
• Property rights in marital and family law contexts.
• The implications of blockchain technology on property transactions and record keeping.
• Legal and ethical considerations in the foreclosure process.
• Water rights and property law: Managing conflicts and ensuring sustainability.
• The impact of natural disasters on property law and homeowner rights.
• Property rights and the challenges of gentrification in urban areas.
• Legal considerations in the conversion of property for commercial use.
• The implications of property law for renewable energy projects (e.g., wind farms, solar panels).
• Historical perspectives on property law and their modern-day relevance.
• The regulation of property within gated communities and homeowners associations.
• Legal issues related to the inheritance of digital assets.
• The role of property law in resolving boundary disputes.
• Property law and the regulation of timeshares and vacation ownership.
• The intersection of property law and bankruptcy proceedings.
• Legal frameworks for managing property during divorce or separation.
• Property rights and the management of shared or common resources.
• Legal challenges in property transactions involving foreign investors.
• Property law in the context of historic preservation and cultural heritage.
• Regulatory issues surrounding the development of commercial properties.
• The role of property law in the sharing economy (e.g., Airbnb, Uber).
• Legal issues in property development and construction.
• The impact of tax law on property ownership and transfer.
• Property law and its implications for homelessness and affordable housing.
• Legal approaches to combating land degradation and promoting sustainable use.
• The role of artificial intelligence and technology in property law enforcement.
• Future trends in property law: Predicting changes and legal needs.
• The role of international law in managing global pandemics and health emergencies.
• Legal frameworks governing the use of force and intervention by states.
• The effectiveness of international sanctions as a tool of diplomacy.
• The implications of sovereignty in the digital age for international law.
• The enforcement mechanisms of international human rights law.
• The legal challenges of climate change negotiations and treaty implementation.
• The jurisdiction and effectiveness of the International Criminal Court (ICC).
• The role of international law in governing outer space activities.
• Legal issues related to the protection of refugees and stateless persons.
• The development and enforcement of international environmental law.
• The impact of international law on maritime disputes and ocean governance.
• The legal basis and implications of unilateral declarations of independence.
• Legal strategies to combat international terrorism within the framework of public international law.
• The role of soft law in international relations and its legal significance.
• International legal aspects of economic sanctions and their impact on trade.
• The resolution of territorial disputes through international courts and tribunals.
• The regulation of armed conflict and the laws of war.
• International law and the regulation of cyberspace and cybersecurity.
• The legal challenges and implications of artificial intelligence on international norms.
• The enforcement of international anti-corruption measures.
• The role of international organizations in global governance.
• Legal issues surrounding the management of international waters.
• The impact of cultural heritage protection under international law.
• International legal standards for labor and their enforcement.
• The relationship between international law and indigenous rights.
• The influence of global financial regulations on international law.
• The compatibility of regional trade agreements with the World Trade Organization (WTO) law.
• Legal protections for investors under international investment agreements.
• International law and its role in addressing global inequality.
• The legal challenges of managing international migration.
• The application of international law in diplomatic relations.
• International legal considerations in the disposal of hazardous wastes.
• The role of public international law in combating human trafficking.
• Legal frameworks for international cooperation in disaster relief and emergency response.
• International law and the challenges of sustainable development.
• The regulation of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) under international law.
• Legal issues surrounding global telecommunications regulations.
• International law and the use of drones in warfare and surveillance.
• The implications of emerging technologies on arms control agreements.
• The future of public international law in a multipolar world.
• Legal implications of doping in sports: An international perspective.
• The enforceability of sports contracts: Analysis of player agreements.
• Intellectual property rights in sports: Branding, trademarks, and image rights.
• Legal aspects of sports broadcasting rights in the digital age.
• The role of arbitration in resolving sports disputes.
• Gender equality in sports: Legal challenges and advancements.
• Legal issues surrounding the organization of international sporting events.
• Sports governance: The impact of legal structures on global sports bodies.
• The application of labor laws to professional athletes and sports leagues.
• The protection of minors in professional sports.
• Anti-discrimination laws and their enforcement in sports.
• Legal considerations in the commercialization of sports.
• Sports injury and liability: The role of law in protecting athletes.
• Ethical and legal considerations in sports betting and gambling.
• The implications of technological advancements on sports law (e.g., VAR, goal-line technology).
• Contract negotiation and dispute resolution in sports.
• The impact of COVID-19 on sports contracts and legal liabilities.
• Legal issues in e-sports: Regulation and recognition.
• Ownership rights and financial regulations in sports clubs.
• Privacy laws and their application to athletes’ personal data.
• The legal framework for anti-doping regulations across different sports.
• The role of sports agents: Legal responsibilities and ethical considerations.
• Disability sports and legal challenges in inclusivity.
• Sports tourism and the law: Legal issues in hosting international events.
• Legal challenges in sports marketing and sponsorship agreements.
• The regulation of sports medicine and legal liabilities.
• The role of national courts in sports law.
• Safeguarding child athletes: Legal obligations and policies.
• The legality of sanctions in sports: Case studies from football and athletics.
• The intersection of sports law and human rights.
• Sports law in collegiate athletics: Compliance and regulation.
• The regulation of violent conduct in sports.
• Legal issues surrounding the use of performance-enhancing technology.
• Sports, media rights, and freedom of expression.
• Legal challenges in managing sports facilities and event safety.
• The impact of sports law on international relations.
• Sports law and the challenge of match-fixing.
• The role of international sports law in the Olympic Movement.
• The governance of water sports and maritime law intersections.
• Future trends in sports law: Emerging issues and legal needs.
• Comparative analysis of international tax treaties and their impact on global trade.
• The legality of digital taxation and its implications for multinational corporations.
• Legal challenges in implementing a global minimum tax for corporations.
• The role of tax law in economic development and foreign direct investment.
• Tax evasion and avoidance: Legal frameworks and enforcement mechanisms.
• The impact of tax incentives on renewable energy investments.
• Estate and inheritance tax laws: A comparative study.
• The effectiveness of VAT systems in developing economies.
• Legal issues surrounding tax havens and offshore financial centers.
• The application of tax laws to cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology.
• The role of taxation in public health policy (e.g., taxes on sugary drinks, tobacco).
• Taxation of the gig economy: Challenges and policy options.
• Legal frameworks governing charitable giving and tax deductions.
• The implications of property tax laws on urban development.
• Transfer pricing regulations and their impact on international business operations.
• The enforcement of sales taxes in the e-commerce sector.
• Tax compliance burdens for small and medium-sized enterprises.
• The legal aspects of tax reforms and policy changes.
• Taxation and privacy: Legal issues in the collection and sharing of taxpayer information.
• Comparative analysis of capital gains tax regulations.
• The role of artificial intelligence in tax administration and compliance.
• The legal challenges of implementing environmental taxes.
• Tax disputes and litigation: Strategies and outcomes.
• The regulation and taxation of financial derivatives.
• Tax law and its impact on charitable organizations and non-profits.
• The interplay between tax law and bankruptcy law.
• Legal strategies used by states to combat tax avoidance and profit shifting.
• The influence of tax policy on housing markets.
• Legal implications of tax credits for family and dependents.
• Taxation of expatriates and non-resident citizens.
• The constitutionality of tax laws and challenges in the courts.
• Tax law as a tool for social equity and redistribution.
• The impact of tax laws on consumer behavior.
• Taxation in the digital media and entertainment industries.
• The role of tax law in regulating pensions and retirement savings.
• Tax policy and its effect on agricultural practices and land use.
• The challenges of harmonizing state and federal tax laws.
• Tax law and the regulation of the sports industry.
• The taxation of international shipping and maritime activities.
• Future trends in tax law: Anticipating changes in global tax policies.

We hope this extensive collection of law thesis topics sparks your intellectual curiosity and aids in pinpointing a subject that resonates with your academic interests and career aspirations. Each topic presented here has been chosen to challenge your understanding and to encourage a deeper exploration of the legal landscape. As you prepare to embark on your thesis journey, consider these topics not just as mere titles, but as gateways to developing a nuanced understanding of the law in various contexts. Utilize this resource to craft a thesis that not only fulfills your academic requirements but also contributes meaningfully to the discourse in your chosen area of law.

The Range of Law Thesis Topics

Exploring the vast expanse of law thesis topics provides a unique opportunity for law students to delve into specific legal issues, refine their understanding, and contribute to the ongoing development of legal scholarship. As students embark on this crucial phase of their academic journey, selecting the right thesis topic is essential. This article aims to illuminate the range of potential law thesis topics, highlighting current issues, recent trends, and future directions. By examining these topics, students can better understand the legal landscape’s complexities and identify areas where they can make a significant academic impact.

Current Issues in Law

As we navigate through the complexities of contemporary society, numerous current issues in law emerge that are critical for law students to explore in their theses. These topics not only reflect ongoing legal challenges but also set the stage for developing effective solutions that uphold justice and societal norms. Delving into these law thesis topics allows students to engage with live issues that impact various facets of the legal system, from privacy laws and civil rights to corporate governance and environmental regulations.

• Privacy and Data Protection: In today’s digital age, the issue of privacy and data protection has come to the forefront. With the proliferation of digital data, the legal frameworks designed to protect personal information are constantly tested. Law students could explore the adequacy of existing laws like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) in the United States, considering the rapid advancements in technology and the increasing global nature of data processing.
• Civil Rights in the Modern Era: As societies evolve, so too do their understandings and implementations of civil rights. Current legal discussions often focus on issues such as police brutality, LGBTQ+ rights, and the protections afforded to individuals under new healthcare regulations. Thesis topics may examine how legal responses are adapting in light of these challenges, particularly in terms of legislative and judicial actions intended to protect marginalized groups.
• Corporate Compliance and Governance: With the global economy becoming more interconnected, the importance of corporate compliance and governance has been magnified. Law thesis topics could investigate how businesses are expected to operate ethically while maximizing shareholder value, especially in industries that have significant impacts on the environment or human rights. Additionally, the legal liabilities of corporate officers and directors for breaches of fiduciary duties remain a hot topic in legal research.
• Environmental Law and Climate Change: Environmental law continues to be a pressing area of legal concern as the effects of climate change become more evident. Law students can explore topics related to the enforcement of environmental regulations, the role of international treaties in combating global warming, and the legal responsibilities of nations and corporations in ensuring sustainability. The recent shifts towards renewable energy sources and their legal implications offer a rich field for exploration.
• Immigration Law: Immigration law remains at the forefront of political and legal debates in many countries. Thesis topics could address the legality of border enforcement practices, the rights of refugees and asylum seekers, and the impact of new immigration policies on families and communities. Additionally, the intersection of immigration law with human rights provides a compelling area for legal research and discussion.
• Intellectual Property in the Innovation Economy: As innovation drives economic growth, intellectual property (IP) law plays a crucial role in protecting inventions, brands, and creative works. However, the tension between IP protection and the public interest, particularly in the pharmaceutical industry and technology sector, presents a complex scenario for legal analysis. Law students might explore the balance between encouraging innovation through patents and copyrights and ensuring public access to essential medicines and technologies.

Each of these areas presents unique challenges and opportunities for law students to contribute to their fields through rigorous analysis and innovative thinking. Addressing these current issues in law not only enhances their academic portfolio but also prepares them to enter the legal profession with a comprehensive understanding of the issues at the forefront of legal practice today. By focusing on these law thesis topics, students can position themselves at the cutting edge of legal research and development.

Recent Trends in Law

The dynamic nature of legal systems worldwide ensures that the landscape of law is perpetually evolving. Recent trends in law have been shaped by technological advancements, societal shifts, and global events that have prompted significant legal developments and debates. These trends provide fertile ground for law thesis topics, offering students a chance to explore the cutting-edge issues that are shaping modern legal doctrines and practices.

• Technology and Law: One of the most pervasive influences on recent legal trends is technology. From the rise of fintech and blockchain technology affecting financial regulations to the challenges posed by artificial intelligence in privacy and intellectual property law, technology is reshaping legal boundaries. Law students could examine topics such as the regulation of autonomous vehicles, legal responses to cybersecurity threats, or the implications of AI in criminal justice systems, including predictive policing and decision-making algorithms.
• Global Health and Law: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the critical role of health law on a global scale. Recent legal trends have focused on public health law’s response to pandemics, including emergency powers, vaccination mandates, and quarantine measures. Thesis topics might analyze the balance between individual rights and public health safety, the legal implications of global vaccine distribution, or the role of the World Health Organization in shaping international health regulations.
• International Trade and Law: Recent shifts in international trade agreements and policies, such as Brexit and changes in the United States’ trade policies, have significant legal implications. Law students have the opportunity to delve into issues surrounding trade negotiations, tariffs, and the role of international bodies like the World Trade Organization in mediating global trade disputes. Additionally, the rise of protectionist policies and their legal ramifications offers a rich area for scholarly investigation.
• Social Justice and Law: Recent years have seen a marked increase in legal initiatives focused on social justice, including movements towards criminal justice reform, police accountability, and the decriminalization of certain activities. Law thesis topics could explore the legal frameworks surrounding prison reform, the abolition of cash bail systems, or the legalization of cannabis and its social, economic, and legal impacts.
• Environmental and Energy Law: With the urgent need for environmental sustainability, recent legal trends have increasingly focused on environmental and energy law. Topics for exploration include the transition to renewable energy sources, legal strategies for reducing carbon footprints, and the enforcement of international environmental agreements like the Paris Accord. Law students could also investigate the legal aspects of green technology patents and their role in promoting eco-friendly innovations.
• Corporate Responsibility and Ethics: There is a growing trend towards ensuring that corporations operate more transparently and ethically, particularly in relation to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria. This shift has led to new regulations and legal standards, offering thesis topics on corporate governance reforms, the legal liabilities of ignoring climate change impacts, and the integration of corporate social responsibility into business operations.

These recent trends in law reflect a world where legal systems are rapidly adapting to external changes and internal pressures. For law students, engaging with these law thesis topics not only provides an opportunity to contribute to scholarly discourse but also to influence future legal practices and policies. As these trends continue to evolve, they will undoubtedly shape the legal landscape for years to come, providing ongoing opportunities for impactful legal research.

Future Directions in Law

The legal landscape is continually evolving, driven by shifts in technology, societal norms, and global dynamics. Identifying and understanding future directions in law is crucial for law students as they consider thesis topics that not only address current legal challenges but also anticipate upcoming legal trends. This exploration provides insights into potential legal reforms, the emergence of new legal fields, and the adaptation of law to future societal needs.

• The Expansion of Cyber Law: As digital technology becomes even more integrated into daily life, the future of law will increasingly hinge on addressing cyber-related issues. Future law thesis topics might explore regulations for the Internet of Things (IoT), legal responses to virtual realities, and the implications of quantum computing on data security and encryption. Additionally, the legalities of digital personhood and AI’s rights and responsibilities will challenge traditional legal frameworks and require innovative legal thinking.
• Climate Change Legislation: Climate change continues to be an urgent global issue, necessitating robust legal frameworks that promote environmental sustainability and mitigate harm. Future legal scholars might focus on international climate agreements, the development of national laws that enforce global climate goals, and the legal responsibilities of countries and corporations in reducing their carbon footprint. The role of law in promoting green technologies and sustainable urban planning will also be critical areas for research.
• Global Legal Cooperation: In an interconnected world, the future of law lies in global cooperation, particularly in areas like human rights, international trade, and public health. Law students could examine the potential for new international treaties, the evolution of supranational legal institutions, and the ways legal systems can work together to address issues such as migration, pandemics, and international crime.
• Legal Implications of Biotechnology: As biotechnological advancements continue, so too will their legal implications. Future thesis topics may include the regulation of genetic editing techniques, bioethics, bioprinting of human organs, and the patenting of biotechnological inventions. The balance between innovation and ethical considerations will be a significant focus, as will the protection of genetic data.
• Reforming Justice Systems: There is an ongoing need for justice system reform, particularly concerning equity, efficiency, and accessibility. Future directions in law could involve examining alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, the decriminalization of certain offenses, and reforms in sentencing practices. Additionally, the adoption of technology in the justice system, such as virtual courtrooms and AI in legal decision-making, presents both opportunities and challenges.
• The Future of Labor Law: The nature of work and the workplace is changing rapidly, prompted by technology and evolving business models. Future law thesis topics might include the legal status and rights of gig economy workers, the use of AI in workplace management, and the implications of remote work for labor law. Legal scholars will need to consider how labor laws can adapt to continue protecting workers’ rights in this new landscape.
• Protecting Rights in a Digital World: As personal and societal activities increasingly move online, protecting individual rights becomes more complex and essential. Future legal research could focus on digital identity, the right to digital privacy, and freedom of expression online. Legal frameworks will need to evolve to protect these rights adequately while balancing them against national security concerns and societal norms.

These future directions in law offer a glimpse into the potential challenges and areas of growth for the legal profession. For law students, engaging with these topics not only helps push the boundaries of current legal thought but also prepares them to play an active role in shaping the future of the legal landscape.

The exploration of law thesis topics is more than an academic requirement; it’s a chance to engage deeply with the legal issues that shape our society and influence our daily lives. As we have seen, the scope of potential topics spans from traditional legal analyses to emerging legal challenges brought about by technological and social changes. Whether addressing longstanding issues or anticipating future legal shifts, students equipped with the right thesis topic can contribute meaningfully to the discourse within their chosen field. Encouragingly, the breadth of law thesis topics offers endless possibilities for investigation and innovation, promising a rich tapestry of legal knowledge that will evolve with the changing world.

iResearchNet’s Thesis Writing Services

iResearchNet takes pride in connecting students with expert degree-holding writers who specialize in their specific fields of law. Our custom writing services are designed to provide in-depth research, incorporating the latest legal theories and case law to produce top-quality, scholarly work. Whether you are struggling with selecting a topic, conducting research, or writing your thesis, our team is equipped to assist you every step of the way.

• Expert Degree-Holding Writers: Our team consists of professionals who not only have advanced degrees in law but also years of experience in legal research and writing. They are well-versed in various legal frameworks and specialties, ensuring that your work is handled by an expert in your specific area of law.
• Custom Written Works: Each thesis is crafted from scratch, tailored to meet your specific requirements and academic guidelines. This bespoke approach ensures that your paper is unique, plagiarism-free, and thoroughly researched.
• In-Depth Research: We use comprehensive legal databases and resources to conduct detailed research. Our writers are skilled in navigating through vast information sources to gather relevant data, supporting your thesis with robust evidence and authoritative references.
• Custom Formatting: Our papers are formatted according to your chosen citation style, whether it’s APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, or Harvard. Attention to detail in formatting not only improves the readability of your thesis but also ensures adherence to academic standards.
• Top Quality: Quality is at the forefront of our services. Each thesis undergoes rigorous checks to ensure it meets high standards of academic excellence. This includes thorough editing and proofreading to eliminate errors and enhance language quality.
• Customized Solutions: Recognizing that each student has unique needs, our services are highly flexible. We offer tailored solutions that align with your specific thesis requirements and academic objectives.
• Flexible Pricing: We provide competitive pricing models that cater to students’ budgets without compromising the quality of our services. Various pricing options are available, depending on the complexity and urgency of the project.
• Short Deadlines: We are equipped to handle urgent requests with deadlines as short as 3 hours. Our efficient process ensures that even the tightest deadlines are met without sacrificing quality.
• Timely Delivery: We guarantee timely delivery of your thesis, allowing you sufficient time to review the work and request any necessary revisions.
• 24/7 Support: Our customer support team is available around the clock to answer your queries and provide assistance whenever you need it.
• Absolute Privacy: We uphold strict confidentiality policies to protect your privacy. All personal and academic information shared with us remains private and secure.
• Easy Order Tracking: Our user-friendly online platform allows you to track the progress of your thesis at any time, providing transparency and peace of mind.
• Money-Back Guarantee: Your satisfaction is our top priority. We offer a money-back guarantee if our work does not meet the agreed academic standards or guidelines.

iResearchNet is dedicated to supporting law students in achieving their academic goals through professional and reliable writing services. By choosing iResearchNet, you are not just purchasing a paper; you are investing in a partnership that values your academic success and future career in law. Let us help you navigate the complexities of your thesis with our expert services, ensuring you deliver outstanding, impactful work that stands out in the academic community.

Order Your Custom-Written Thesis Today!

Embarking on your thesis journey in law is a pivotal step in your academic career and professional development. At iResearchNet, we are committed to empowering you with the tools, resources, and expert guidance necessary to craft a thesis that not only meets but exceeds academic expectations. With the challenges and complexities of legal research, having a supportive and knowledgeable partner can make all the difference.

Don’t wait any longer to secure your success—order your custom thesis paper today from iResearchNet!

Choosing iResearchNet means you are setting yourself up for academic excellence. With our team of expert writers, comprehensive support, and tailored services, you can navigate your thesis process with confidence. Here are just a few reasons why iResearchNet is your ideal partner:

• Expert Guidance: Receive support from professionals who are specialists in their legal fields.
• Customized Research: Benefit from a thesis that is meticulously researched and customized to your specific topic and requirements.
• Outstanding Quality: Trust in the quality of our work, which is designed to achieve excellence.
• Time-Efficient: Save valuable time with our efficient processes and timely delivery.
• Supportive Services: Access our 24/7 customer support for any questions or additional support you may need.

Your academic journey deserves the best possible support. Take the next step towards achieving your academic and professional goals by letting iResearchNet handle the complexities of your thesis.

iResearchNet is not just a service; it’s your partner in academic success. We’re here to support you from start to finish, ensuring your thesis is a robust, compelling, and influential piece of work that paves the way for your future in the legal field. Don’t miss out on the opportunity to excel—let iResearchNet help you achieve the excellence you deserve.

ORDER HIGH QUALITY CUSTOM PAPER

Legal Research & Writing Support

Legal writing.

• Point Made: How to Write Like the Nation’s Top Advocates
• The Pre-Writing Handbook for Law Students: A Step-by-Step Guide
• The Legal Writing Survival Guide
• Legal Writing and Analysis in a Nutshell
• Gilbert Law Summary on Legal Research, Writing & Analysis
• A Short & Happy Guide to Legal Writing
• The Grammar and Writing Handbook for Lawyers
• Writing a Legal Memo
• The Legal Memo: 50 Exercises for Mastery: Practice for the New Legal Writer
• The Lawyer’s Essential Guide to Writing
• Legal Writing Style
• Legal Writing Exercises: A Practical Guide to Clear and Persuasive Writing for Lawyers
• Legal Writing: A Judge’s Perspective on the Science and Rhetoric of the Written Word
• The Winning Brief (hard copy available in the Law Library)
• The Redbook: A Manual on Legal Style (hard copy available in the Law Library)

Legal Research 

• Bob Berring & Michael Levy, The Legal Research Survival Manual
• Marci Hoffman, International Legal Research in a Nutshell
• Berkeley Law 1L Research Guide
• Berkeley Law LL.M. Survival Guide
• Berkeley Law Video Tutorials & Legal Research Training
• Berkeley Law Library Guide to Boolean Searches
• Kent Olson, Aaron Kirschenfeld & Ingrid Mattson, Principles of Legal Research
• Ann Walsh Long, A Short and Happy Guide to Advanced Legal Research
• Kent Olson, Legal Research in a Nutshell
• Examples & Explanations for Legal Research
• Guide to International Legal Research
• Lexis Guide to Terms and Connectors
• Westlaw Quick Reference Guide – Boolean Terms and Connectors
• Westlaw Training and Support

Legal Citation

• Legal Citation in a Nutshell
• Linda Barris, Understanding and Mastering the Bluebook: A Guide for Students and Practitioners  
• Deborah Bouchoux, Cite-Checker: Your Guide to Using the Bluebook (hard copy available in the Law Library)
• Alan Dworsky, User’s Guide to the Bluebook (hard copy available in the Law Library)

Scholarly Writing

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Open access
• Published: 06 August 2024

AI and ethics: Investigating the first policy responses of higher education institutions to the challenge of generative AI

• Attila Dabis   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4924-7664 1 &
• Csaba Csáki   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8245-1002 1  

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications volume  11 , Article number:  1006 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

122 Accesses

1 Altmetric

Metrics details

• Science, technology and society

This article addresses the ethical challenges posed by generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools in higher education and explores the first responses of universities to these challenges globally. Drawing on five key international documents from the UN, EU, and OECD, the study used content analysis to identify key ethical dimensions related to the use of generative AI in academia, such as accountability, human oversight, transparency, or inclusiveness. Empirical evidence was compiled from 30 leading universities ranked among the top 500 in the Shanghai Ranking list from May to July 2023, covering those institutions that already had publicly available responses to these dimensions in the form of policy documents or guidelines. The paper identifies the central ethical imperative that student assignments must reflect individual knowledge acquired during their education, with human individuals retaining moral and legal responsibility for AI-related wrongdoings. This top-down requirement aligns with a bottom-up approach, allowing instructors flexibility in determining how they utilize generative AI especially large language models in their own courses. Regarding human oversight, the typical response identified by the study involves a blend of preventive measures (e.g., course assessment modifications) and soft, dialogue-based sanctioning procedures. The challenge of transparency induced the good practice of clear communication of AI use in course syllabi in the first university responses examined by this study.

Similar content being viewed by others

Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on higher education: The dynamics of ethical, social, and educational implications

Intersectionality of social and philosophical frameworks with technology: could ethical AI restore equality of opportunities in academia?

Research on flipped classrooms in foreign language teaching in Chinese higher education

Introduction.

The competition in generative artificial intelligence (AI) ignited by the arrival of ChatGPT, the conversational platform based on a large language model (LLM) in late November 2022 (OpenAI, 2022 ) had a shocking effect even on those who are not involved in the industry (Rudolph et al. 2023 ). Within four months, on 22 March 2023, an open letter was signed by several hundred IT professionals, corporate stakeholders, and academics calling on all AI labs to immediately pause the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4 (i.e., those that may trick a human being into believing it is conversing with a peer rather than a machine) for at least six months (Future of Life Institute, 2023 ).

Despite these concerns, competition in generative AI and LLMs does not seem to lose momentum, forcing various social systems to overcome the existential distress they might feel about the changes and the uncertainty of what the future may bring (Roose, 2023 ). Organisations and individuals from different sectors of the economy and various industries are looking for adaptive strategies to accommodate the emerging new normal. This includes lawmakers, international organisations, employers, and employees, as well as academic and higher education institutions (Ray, 2023 ; Wach et al. 2023 ). This fierce competition generates gaps in real-time in everyday and academic life, the latter of which is also trying to make sense of the rapid technological advancement and its effects on university-level education (Perkins, 2023 ). Naturally, these gaps can only be filled, and relevant questions answered much slower by academia, making AI-related research topics timely.

This article aims to reduce the magnitude of these gaps and is intended to help leaders, administrators, teachers, and students better understand the ramifications of AI tools on higher education institutions. It will do so by providing a non-exhaustive snapshot of how various universities around the world responded to generative AI-induced ethical challenges in their everyday academic lives within six-eights months after the arrival of ChatGPT. Thus, the research had asked what expectations and guidelines the first policies introduced into existing academic structures to ensure the informed, transparent, responsible and ethical use of the new tools of generative AI (henceforth GAI) by students and teachers. Through reviewing and evaluating first responses and related difficulties the paper helps institutional decision-makers to create better policies to address AI issues specific to academia. The research reported here thus addressed actual answers to the question of what happened at the institutional (policy) level as opposed to what should happen with the use of AI in classrooms. Based on such a descriptive overview, one may contemplate normative recommendations and their realistic implementability.

Given the global nature of the study’s subject matter, the paper presents examples from various continents. Even though it was not yet a widespread practice to adopt separate, AI-related guidelines, the research focused on universities that had already done so quite early. Furthermore, as best practices most often accrue from the highest-ranking universities, the analysis only considered higher education institutions that were represented among the top 500 universities in the Shanghai Ranking list (containing 3041 Universities at the time), a commonly used source to rank academic excellence. Footnote 1 The main sources of this content analysis are internal documents (such as Codes of Ethics, Academic Regulations, Codes of Practice and Procedure, Guidelines for Students and Teachers or similar policy documents) from those institutions whose response to the GAI challenge was publicly accessible.

The investigation is organised around AI-related ethical dilemmas as concluded from relevant international documents, such as the instruments published by the UN, the EU, and the OECD (often considered soft law material). Through these sources, the study inductively identifies the primary aspects that these AI guidelines mention and can be connected to higher education. Thus it only contains concise references to the main ethical implications of the manifold pedagogical practices in which AI tools can be utilised in the classroom. The paper starts with a review of the challenges posed by AI technology to higher education with special focus on ethical dilemmas. Section 3 covers the research objective and the methodology followed. Section 4 presents the analysis of the selected international documents and establishes a list of key ethical principles relevant in HE contexts and in parallel presents the analysis of the examples distilled from the institutional policy documents and guidelines along that dimension. The paper closes with drawing key conclusions as well as listing limitations and ideas for future research.

Generative AI and higher education: Developments in the literature

General ai-related challenges in the classroom from a historical perspective.

Jacque Ellul fatalistically wrote already in 1954 that the “infusion of some more or less vague sentiment of human welfare” cannot fundamentally alter technology’s “rigorous autonomy”, bringing him to the conclusion that “technology never observes the distinction between moral and immoral use” (Ellul, 1964 , p. 97). Footnote 2 Jumping ahead nearly six decades, the above quote comes to the fore, among others, when evaluating the moral and ethical aspects of the services offered by specific software programs, like ChatGPT. While they might be trained to give ethical answers, these moral barriers can be circumvented by prompt injection (Blalock, 2022 ), or manipulated with tricks (Alberti, 2022 ), so generative AI platforms can hardly be held accountable for the inaccuracy of their responses Footnote 3 or how the physical user who inserted a prompt will make use of the output. Indeed, the AI chatbot is now considered to be a potentially disruptive technology in higher education practices (Farazouli et al. 2024 ).

Educators and educational institution leaders have from the beginning sought solutions on how “to use a variety of the strategies and technologies of the day to help their institutions adapt to dramatically changing social needs” (Miller, 2023 , p. 3). Education in the past had always had high hopes for applying the latest technological advances (Reiser, 2001 ; Howard and Mozejko, 2015 ), including the promise of providing personalised learning or using the latest tools to create and manage courses (Crompton and Burke, 2023 ).

The most basic (and original) educational settings include three components: the blackboard with chalk, the instructor, and textbooks as elementary “educational technologies” at any level (Reiser, 2001 ). Beyond these, one may talk about “educational media” which, once digital technology had entered the picture, have progressed from Computer Based Learning to Learning Management Systems to the use of the Internet, and lately to online shared learning environments with various stages in between including intelligent tutoring system, Dialogue-based Tutoring System, and Exploratory Learning Environment and Artificial Intelligence (Paek and Kim, 2021 ). And now the latest craze is about the generative form of AI often called conversational chatbot (Rudolph et al. 2023 ).

The above-mentioned promises appear to be no different in the case of using generative AI tools in education (Baskara, 2023a ; Mhlanga, 2023 ; Yan et al. 2023 ). The general claim is that GAI chatbots have transformative potential in HE (Mollick and Mollick, 2022 ; Ilieva et al. 2023 ). It is further alleged, that feedback mechanisms supposedly provided by GAI can be used to provide personalised guidance to students (Baskara, 2023b ). Some argue, that “AI education should be expanded and improved, especially by presenting realistic use cases and the real limitations of the technology, so that students are able to use AI confidently and responsibly in their professional future” (Almaraz-López et al. 2023 , p. 1). It is still debated whether the hype is justified, yet the question still remains, how to address the issues arising in the wake of the educational application of GAI tools (Ivanov, 2023 ; Memarian and Doleck, 2023 ).

Generative AI tools, such as their most-known representative, ChatGPT impact several areas of learning and teaching. From the point of view of students, chatbots may help with so-called Self-Regulated or Self-Determined Learning (Nicol and Macfarlane‐Dick, 2006 ; Baskara, 2023b ), where students either dialogue with chatbots or AI help with reviewing student work, even correcting it and giving feedback (Uchiyama et al. 2023 ). There are innovative ideas on how to use AI to support peer feedback (Bauer et al. 2023 ). Some consider that GAI can provide adaptive and personalised environments (Qadir, 2023 ) and may offer personalised tutoring (see, for example, Limo et al. ( 2023 ) on ChatGPT as a virtual tutor for personalized learning experiences). Furthermore, Yan et al. ( 2023 ) lists nine different categories of educational tasks that prior studies have attempted to automate using LLMs: Profiling and labelling (various educational or related content), Detection, Assessment and grading, Teaching support (in various educational and communication activities), Prediction, Knowledge representation, Feedback, Content generation (outline, questions, cases, etc.), Recommendation.

From the lecturers’ point of view, one of the most argued impacts is that assessment practices need to be revisited (Chaudhry et al. 2023 ; Gamage et al. 2023 ; Lim et al. 2023 ). For example, ChatGPT-written responses to exam questions may not be distinguished from student-written answers (Rudolph et al. 2023 ; Farazouli et al. 2024 ). Furthermore, essay-type works are facing special challenges (Sweeney, 2023 ). On the other hand, AI may be utilised to automate a range of educational tasks, such as test question generation, including open-ended questions, test correction, or even essay grading, feedback provision, analysing student feedback surveys, and so on (Mollick and Mollick, 2022 ; Rasul et al. 2023 ; Gimpel et al. 2023 ).

There is no convincing evidence, however, that either lecturers or dedicated tools are able to distinguish AI-written and student-written text with high enough accuracy that can be used to prove unethical behaviour in all cases (Akram, 2023 ). This led to concerns regarding the practicality and ethicality of such innovations (Yan et al. 2023 ). Indeed, the appearance of ChatGPT in higher education has reignited the (inconclusive) debate on the potential and risks associated with AI technologies (Ray, 2023 ; Rudolph et al. 2023 ).

When new technologies appear in or are considered for higher education, debates about their claimed advantages and potential drawbacks heat up as they are expected to disrupt traditional practices and require teachers to adapt to their potential benefits and drawbacks (as collected by Farrokhnia et al. 2023 ). One key area of such debates is the ethical issues raised by the growing accessibility of generative AI and discursive chatbots.

Key ethical challenges posed by AI in higher education

Yan et al. ( 2023 ), while investigating the practicality of AI in education in general, also consider ethicality in the context of educational technology and point out that related debates over the last decade (pre-ChatGPT, so to say), mostly focused on algorithmic ethics, i.e. concerns related to data mining and using AI in learning analytics. At the same time, the use of AI by teachers or, especially, by students has received less attention (or only under the scope or traditional human ethics). However, with the arrival of generative AI chatbots (such as ChatGPT), the number of publications about their use in higher education grew rapidly (Rasul et al. 2023 ; Yan et al. 2023 ).

The study by Chan ( 2023 ) offers a (general) policy framework for higher education institutions, although it focuses on one location and is based on the perceptions of students and teachers. While there are studies that collect factors to be considered for the ethical use of AI in HE, they appear to be restricted to ChatGPT (see, for example, Mhlanga ( 2023 )). Mhlanga ( 2023 ) presents six factors: respect for privacy, fairness, and non-discrimination, transparency in the use of ChatGPT, responsible use of AI (including clarifying its limitations), ChatGPT is not a substitute for human teachers, and accuracy of information. The framework by Chan ( 2023 ) is aimed at creating policies to teach students about GAI and considers three dimensions: pedagogical, governance, and operational. Within those dimensions, ten key areas identified covering ethical concerns such as academic integrity versus academic misconduct and related ethical dilemmas (e.g. cheating or plagiarism), data privacy, transparency, accountability and security, equity in access to AI technologies, critical AI literacy, over-reliance on AI technologies (not directly ethical), responsible use of AI (in general), competencies impeded by AI (such as leadership and teamwork). Baskara ( 2023b ), while also looking at ChatGPT only, considers the following likely danger areas: privacy, algorithmic bias issues, data security, and the potential negative impact of ChatGPT on learners’ autonomy and agency, The paper also questions the possible negative impact of GAI on social interaction and collaboration among learners. Although Yan et al. ( 2023 ) considers education in general (not HE in particular) during its review of 118 papers published since 2017 on the topic of AI ethics in education, its list of areas to look at is still relevant: transparency (of the models used), privacy (related to data collection and use by AI tools), equality (such as availability of AI tools in different languages), and beneficence (e.g. avoiding bias and avoiding biased and toxic knowledge from training data). While systematically reviewing recent publications about AI’s “morality footprint” in higher education, Memarian and Doleck ( 2023 ) consider the Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics (FATE) approach as their framework of analyses. They note that “Ethics” appears to be the most used term as it serves as a general descriptor, while the other terms are typically only used in their descriptive sense, and their operationalisation is often lacking in related literature.

Regarding education-related data analytics, Khosravi et al. ( 2022 ) argue that educational technology that involves AI should consider accountability, explainability, fairness, interpretability and safety as key ethical concerns. Ferguson et al. ( 2016 ) also looked at learning analytics solutions using AI and warned of potential issues related to privacy, beneficence, and equality. M.A. Chaudhry et al. ( 2022 ) emphasise that enhancing the comprehension of stakeholders of a new educational AI system is the most important task, which requires making all information and decision processes available to those affected, therefore the key concern is related to transparency according to their arguments.

As such debates continue, it is difficult to identify an established definition of ethical AI in HE. It is clear, however, that the focus should not be on detecting academic misconduct (Rudolph et al. 2023 ). Instead, practical recommendations are required. This is especially true as even the latest studies focus mostly on issues related to assessment practices (Chan, 2023 ; Farazouli et al. 2024 ) and often limit their scope to ChatGPT (Cotton et al. 2024 ) (this specific tool still dominates discourses of LLMs despite the availability of many other solutions since its arrival). At the same time, the list of issues addressed appears to be arbitrary, and most publications do not look at actual practices on a global scale. Indeed, reviews of actual current practices of higher education institutions are rare, and this aspect is not yet the focus of recent HE AI ethics research reports.

As follows from the growing literature and the debate shaping up about the implications of using GAI tools in HE, there was a clear need for a systematic review of how first responses in actual academic policies and guidelines in practice have represented and addressed known ethical principles.

Research objective and methodology

In order to contribute to the debate on the impact of GAI on HE, this study aimed to review how leading institutions had reacted to the arrival of generative AI (such as ChatGPT) and what policies or institutional guidelines they have put in place shortly after. The research intended to understand whether key ethical principles were reflected in the first policy responses of HE institutions and, if yes, how they were handled.

As potential principles can diverge and could be numerous, as well as early guidelines may cover wide areas, the investigation is intended to be based on a few broad categories instead of trying to manage a large set of ideals and goals. To achieve this objective, the research was executed in three steps:

It was started with identifying and collecting general ethical ideals, which were then translated and structured for the context of higher education. A thorough content analysis was performed with the intention to put emphasis on positive values instead of simply focusing on issues or risks and their mitigation.

Given those positive ideals, this research collected actual examples of university policies and guidelines already available: this step was executed from May to July 2023 to find early responses addressing such norms and principles developed by leading HE institutions.

The documents identified were then analysed to understand how such norms and principles had been addressed by leading HE institutions.

As a result, this research managed to highlight and contrast differing practical views, and the findings raise awareness about the difficulties of creating relevant institutional policies. The research considered the ethics of using GAI and not expectations towards their development. The next two sections provide details of the two steps.

Establishing ethical principles for higher education

While the review of relevant ethical and HE literature (as presented above) was not fully conclusive, it highlighted the importance and need for some ideals specific to HE. Therefore, as a first step, this study sought to find highly respected sources of such ethical dimensions by executing a directed content analysis of relevant international regulatory and policy recommendations.

In order to establish what key values and ideas drive the formation of future AI regulations in general, Corrêa et al. ( 2023 ) investigated 200 publications discussing governance policies and ethical guidelines for using AI as proposed by various organisations (including national governments and institutions, civil society and academic organisations, private companies, as well as international bodies). The authors were also interested in whether there are common patterns or missing ideals and norms in this extensive set of proposals and recommendations. As the research was looking for key principles and normative attributes that could form a common ground for the comparison of HE policies, this vast set of documents was used to identify internationally recognised bodies that have potential real influence in this arena and decided to consider the guidelines and recommendations they have put forward for the ethical governance of AI. Therefore, for the purpose of this study, the following sources were selected (some organisations, such as the EU were represented by several bodies):

European Commission ( 2021 ): Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts (2021/0106 (COD)) . Footnote 4

European Parliament Committee on Culture and Education ( 2021 ): Report on artificial intelligence in education, culture and the audiovisual sector (2020/2017(INI)) . Footnote 5

High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (EUHLEX) ( 2019 ): Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI . Footnote 6

UNESCO ( 2022 ): Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (SHS/BIO/PI/2021/1) . Footnote 7

OECD ( 2019 ): Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence (OECD/LEGAL/0449) . Footnote 8

The ethical dilemmas established by these international documents (most of which is considered soft law material) were then used to inductively identify the primary aspects around which the investigation of educational AI principles may be organised.

Among the above documents, the EUHLEX material is the salient one as it contains a Glossary that defines and explains, among others, the two primary concepts that will be used in this paper: “artificial intelligence” and “ethics”. As this paper is, to a large extent, based on the deducted categorisation embedded in these international documents, it will follow suit in using the above terms as EUHLEX did, supporting it with the definitions contained in the other four referenced international documents. Consequently, artificial intelligence (AI) systems are referred to in this paper as software and hardware systems designed by humans that “act in the physical or digital dimension by perceiving their environment through data acquisition, interpreting the collected structured or unstructured data, reasoning on the knowledge, or processing the information, derived from this data and deciding the best action(s) to take to achieve the given goal” (EUHLEX, 2019 ). With regards to ethics, the EUHLEX group defines this term, in general as an academic discipline which is a subfield of philosophy, dealing with questions like “What is a good action?”, “What is the value of a human life?”, “What is justice?”, or “What is the good life?”. It also mentions that academia distinguishes four major fields: (i) Meta-ethics, (ii) normative ethics, (iii) descriptive ethics, and (iv) applied ethics ” (EUHLEX, 2019 , p. 37). Within these, AI ethics belongs to the latter group of applied ethics that focuses on the practical issues raised by the design, development, implementation, and use of AI systems. By extension, the application of AI systems in higher education also falls under the domain of applied ethics.

The selection of sample universities

The collection of cases started with the AI guidelines compiled by the authors as members of the AI Committee at their university from May to July 2023. The AI Committee consisted of 12 members and investigated over 150 cases to gauge international best practices of GAI use in higher education when formulating a policy recommendation for their own university leadership. Given the global nature of the subject matter, examples from various continents were collected. From this initial pool authors narrowed the scope to the Top 500 higher education institutions of the Shanghai Ranking list for this study, as best practices most often accrue from the highest-ranking universities. Finally, only those institutions were included which, at the time of data collection, have indeed had publicly available policy documents or guidelines with clearly identifiable ethical considerations (such as relevant internal documents, Codes of Ethics, Academic Regulations, Codes of Practice and Procedure, or Guidelines for Students and Teachers). By the end of this selection process, 30 samples proved to be substantiated enough to be included in this study (presented in Table 1 ).

All documents were contextually analysed and annotated by both authors individually looking for references or mentions of ideas, actions or recommendations related to the ethical principles identified during the first step of the research. These comments were then compared and commonalities analysed regarding the nature and goal of the ethical recommendation.

Principles and practices of responsible use of AI in higher education

Ai-related ethical codes forming the base of this investigation.

A common feature of the selected AI ethics documents issued by international organisations is that they enumerate a set of ethical principles based on fundamental human values. The referenced international documents have different geographical- and policy scopes, yet they overlap in their categorisation of the ethical dimensions relevant to this research, even though they might use discrepant language to describe the same phenomenon (a factor we took into account when establishing key categories). For example, what EUHLEX dubs as “Human agency and oversight” is addressed by UNESCO under the section called “Human oversight and determination”, yet they essentially cover the same issues and recommended requirements. Among the many principles enshrined in these documents, the research focuses on those that can be directly linked to the everyday education practices of universities in relation to AI tools, omitting those that, within this context, are less situation-dependent and should normally form the overarching basis of the functioning of universities at all times, such as: respecting human rights and fundamental freedoms, refraining from all forms of discrimination, the right to privacy and data protection, or being aware of environmental concerns and responsibilities regarding sustainable development. As pointed out by Nikolinakos ( 2023 ), such principles and values provide essential guidance not only for development but also during the deployment and use of AI systems. Synthesising the common ethical codes in these instruments has led to the following cluster of ethical principles that are directly linked to AI-related higher education practices:

Accountability and responsibility;

Human agency and oversight;

Transparency and explainability

Inclusiveness and diversity.

The following subsections will give a comprehensive definition of these ethical areas and relate them to higher education expectations. Each subsection will first explain the corresponding ethical cluster, then present the specific university examples, concluding with a summary of the identified best practice under that particular cluster.

Accountability and responsibility

Definition in ethical codes and relevance.

The most fundamental requirements, appearing in almost all relevant documents, bring forward the necessity that mechanisms should be implemented to ensure responsibility and accountability for AI systems and their outcomes. These cover expectations both before and after their deployment, including development and use. They entail the basic requirements of auditability (i.e. the enablement of the assessment of algorithms), clear roles in the management of data and design processes (as a means for contributing to the trustworthiness of AI technology), the minimalisation and reporting of negative impacts (focusing on the possibility of identifying, assessing, documenting and reporting on the potential negative impacts of AI systems), as well as the ability of redress (understood as the capability to utilise mechanisms that offer legal and practical remedy when unjust adverse impact occurs) (EUHLEX, 2019 , pp. 19–20).

Additionally, Points 35–36 of the UNESCO recommendations remind us that it is imperative to “attribute ethical and legal responsibility for any stage of the life cycle of AI systems, as well as in cases of remedy related to AI systems, to physical persons or to existing legal entities. AI system can never replace ultimate human responsibility and accountability” (UNESCO, 2022 , p. 22).

The fulfilment of this fundamental principle is also expected from academic authors, as per the announcements of some of the largest publishing houses in the world. Accordingly, AI is not an author or co-author, Footnote 9 and AI-assisted technologies should not be cited as authors either, Footnote 10 given that AI-generated content cannot be considered capable of initiating an original piece of research without direction from human authors. The ethical guidelines of Wiley ( 2023 ) stated that ”[AI tools] also cannot be accountable for a published work or for research design, which is a generally held requirement of authorship, nor do they have legal standing or the ability to hold or assign copyright.” Footnote 11 This research angle carries over to teaching as well since students are also expected to produce outputs that are the results of their own work. Furthermore, they also often do their own research (such as literature search and review) in support of their projects, homework, thesis, and other forms of performance evaluation.

Accountability and responsibility in university first responses

The rapidly changing nature of the subject matter poses a significant challenge for scholars to assess the state of play of human responsibility. This is well exemplified by the reversal of hearts by some Australian universities (see Rudolph et al. ( 2023 ) quoting newspaper articles) who first disallowed the use of AI by students while doing assignments, just to reverse that decision a few months later and replace it by a requirement of disclosing the use of AI in homeworks. Similarly, Indian governments have been oscillating between a non-regulatory approach to foster an “innovation-friendly environment” for their universities in the summer of 2023 (Liu, 2023 ), only to roll back on this pledge a few months later (Dhaor, 2023 ).

Beyond this regulatory entropy, a fundamental principle enshrined in university codes of ethics across the globe is that students need to meet existing rules of scientific referencing and authorship. Footnote 12 In other words, they should refrain from any form of plagiarism in all their written work (including essays, theses, term papers, or in-class presentations). Submitting any work and assessments created by someone or something else (including AI-generated content) as if it was their own usually amounts to either a violation of scientific referencing, plagiarism or is considered to be a form of cheating (or a combination of these), depending on the terminology used by the respective higher education institution.

As a course description of Johns Hopkins puts it, “academic honesty is required in all work you submit to be graded …., you must solve all homework and programming assignments without the help of outside sources (e.g., GAI tools)” (Johns Hopkins University, 2023 ).

The Tokyo Institute of Technology applies a more flexible approach, as they “trust the independence of the students and expect the best use” of AI systems from them based on good sense and ethical standards. They add, however, that submitting reports that rely almost entirely on the output of GenAI is “highly improper, and its continued use is equivalent to one’s enslavement to the technology” (Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2023 ).

In the case of York University, the Senate’s Academic Standards, Curriculum, and Pedagogy Committee clarified in February 2023 that students are not authorised to use “text-, image-, code-, or video-generating AI tools when completing their academic work unless explicitly permitted by a specific instructor in a particular course” (York University Senate, 2023 ).

In the same time frame (6 February 2023), the University of Oxford stated in a guidance material for staff members that “the unauthorised use of AI tools in exams and other assessed work is a serious disciplinary offence” not permitted for students (University of Oxford, 2023b ).

Main message and best practice: honesty and mutual trust

In essence, students are not allowed to present AI-generated content as their own, Footnote 13 and they should have full responsibility and accountability for their own papers. Footnote 14 This is in line with the most ubiquitous principle enshrined in almost all university guidelines, irrespective of AI, that students are expected to complete their tasks based on their own knowledge and skills obtained throughout their education.

Given that the main challenge here is unauthorised use and overreliance on GAI platforms, the best practice answer is for students to adhere to academic honesty and integrity, scientific referencing standards, existing anti-plagiarism rules, and complete university assignments without fully relying on GAI tools, using, first and foremost, their own skills. The only exception is when instructed otherwise by their professors. By extension, preventing overuse and unauthorised use of AI assists students in avoiding undermining their own academic capacity-building efforts.

Human agency and oversight

AI systems have the potential to manipulate and influence human behaviour in ways that are not easily detectable. AI systems must, therefore, follow human-centric design principles and leave meaningful opportunities for human choice and intervention. Such systems should not be able to unjustifiably subordinate, coerce, deceive, manipulate, condition or herd humans (EUHLEX, 2019 , p. 16).

Human oversight thus refers to the capability for human intervention in every decision cycle of the AI system and the ability of users to make informed, autonomous decisions regarding AI systems. This encompasses the ability to choose not to use an AI system in a particular situation or to halt AI-related operations via a “stop” button or a comparable procedure in case the user detects anomalies, dysfunctions and unexpected performance from AI tools (European Commission, 2021 , Art. 14).

The sheer capability of active oversight and intervention vis-á-vis GAI systems is strongly linked to ethical responsibility and legal accountability. As Liao puts it, “the sufficient condition for human beings being rightsholders is that they have a physical basis for moral agency.” (Liao, 2020 , pp. 496–497). Wagner complemented this with the essential point that entity status for non-human actors would help to shield other parties from liability, i.e., primarily manufacturers and users (Wagner, 2018 ). This, in turn, would result in risk externalisation, which serves to minimise or relativise a person’s moral accountability and legal liability associated with wrongful or unethical acts.

Users, in our case, are primarily students who, at times, might be tempted to make use of AI tools in an unethical way, hoping to fulfil their university tasks faster and more efficiently than they could without these.

Human agency and oversight in university first responses

The crucial aspect of this ethical issue is the presence of a “stop” button or a similar regulatory procedure to streamline the operation of GAI tools. Existing university guidelines in this question point clearly in the direction of soft sanctions, if any, given the fact that there is a lack of evidence that AI detection platforms are effective and reliable tools to tell apart human work from AI-generated ones. Additionally, these tools raise some significant implications for privacy and data security issues, which is why university guidelines are particularly cautious when referring to these. Accordingly, the National Taiwan University, the University of Toronto, the University of Waterloo, the University of Miami, the National Autonomous University of Mexico, and Yale, among others, do not recommend the use of AI detection platforms in university assessments. The University of Zürich further added the moral perspective in a guidance note from 13 July 2023, that “forbidding the use of undetectable tools on unsupervised assignments or demanding some sort of honour code likely ends up punishing the honest students” (University of Zürich, 2023 ). Apart from unreliability, the University of Cape Town also drew attention in its guide for staff that AI detection tools may “disproportionately flag text written by non-first language speakers as AI-generated” (University of Cape Town, 2023 , p. 8).

Macquarie University took a slightly more ambiguous stance when they informed their staff that, while it is not “proof” for anything, an AI writing detection feature was launched within Turnitin as of 5 April 2023 (Hillier, 2023 ), claiming that the software has a 97% detection rate with a 1% false positive rate in the tests that they had conducted (Turnitin, 2023 ). Apart from these, Boston University is among the few examples that recommend employing AI detection tools, but only in a restricted manner to ”evaluate the degree to which AI tools have likely been employed” and not as a source for any punitive measures against students (University of Boston, 2023 ). Remarkably, they complement the above with suggestions for a merit-based scoring system, whereby instructors shall treat work by students who declare no use of AI tools as the baseline for grading. A lower baseline is suggested for students who declare the use of AI tools (depending on how extensive the usage was), and for the bottom of this spectrum, the university suggests imposing a significant penalty for low-energy or unreflective reuse of material generated by AI tools and assigning zero points for merely reproducing the output from AI platforms.

A discrepant approach was adopted at the University of Toronto. Here, if an instructor indicates that the use of AI tools is not permitted on an assessment, and a student is later found to have used such a tool nevertheless, then the instructor should consider meeting with the student as the first step of a dialogue-based process under the Code of Behaviour on Academic Matters (the same Code, which categorises the use of ChatGPT and other such tools as “unauthorised aid” or as “any other form of cheating” in case, an instructor specified that no outside assistance was permitted on an assignment) (University of Toronto, 2019 ).

More specifically, Imperial College London’s Guidance on the Use of Generative AI tools envisages the possibility of inviting a random selection of students to a so-called “authenticity interview” on their submitted assignments (Imperial College London, 2023b ). This entails requiring students to attend an oral examination of their submitted work to ensure its authenticity, which includes questions about the subject or how they approached their assignment.

As a rare exception, the University of Helsinki represents one of the more rigorous examples. The “Guidelines for the Use of AI in Teaching at the University of Helsinki” does not lay down any specific procedures for AI-related ethical offences. On the contrary, as para. 7 stipulates the unauthorised use of GAI in any course examination “constitutes cheating and will be treated in the same way as other cases of cheating” (University of Helsinki, 2023 ). Footnote 15

Those teachers who are reluctant to make AI tools a big part of their courses should rather aim to develop course assessment methods that can plausibly prevent the use of AI tools instead of attempting to filter these afterwards. Footnote 16 For example, the Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin instructs that, if possible, oral or practical examinations or written examinations performed on-site are recommended as alternatives to “classical” written home assignments (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 2023a ).

Monash University also mentions some examples in this regard (Monash University, 2023a ), such as: asking students to create oral presentations, videos, and multimedia resources; asking them to incorporate more personal reflections tied to the concepts studied; implementing programmatic assessment that focuses on assessing broader attributes of students, using multiple methods rather than focusing on assessing individual kinds of knowledge or skills using a single assessment method (e.g., writing an essay).

Similarly, the University of Toronto suggest instructors to: ask students to respond to a specific reading that is very new and thus has a limited online footprint; assign group work to be completed in class, with each member contributing; or ask students to create a first draft of an assignment by hand, which could be complemented by a call to explain or justify certain elements of their work (University of Toronto, 2023 ).

Main message and best practice: Avoiding overreaction

In summary, the best practice that can be identified under this ethical dilemma is to secure human oversight through a blend of preventive measures (e.g. a shift in assessment methods) and soft sanctions. Given that AI detectors are unreliable and can cause a series of data privacy issues, the sanctioning of unauthorised AI use should happen on a “soft basis”, as part of a dialogue with the student concerned. Additionally, universities need to be aware and pay due attention to potentially unwanted rebound effects of bona fide measures, such as the merit-based scoring system of the University of Boston. In that case, using different scoring baselines based on the self-declared use of AI could, in practice, generate incentives for not declaring any use of AI at all, thereby producing counter-effective results.

While explainability refers to providing intelligible insight into the functioning of AI tools with a special focus on the interplay between the user’s input and the received output, transparency alludes to the requirement of providing unambiguous communication in the framework of system use.

As the European Commission’s Regulation proposal ( 2021 ) puts it under subchapter 5.2.4., transparency obligations should apply for systems that „(i) interact with humans, (ii) are used to detect emotions or determine association with (social) categories based on biometric data, or (iii) generate or manipulate content (‘deep fakes’). When persons interact with an AI system or their emotions or characteristics are recognised through automated means, people must be informed of that circumstance. If an AI system is used to generate or manipulate image, audio or video content that appreciably resembles authentic content, there should be an obligation to disclose that the content is generated through automated means, subject to exceptions for legitimate purposes (law enforcement, freedom of expression). This allows persons to make informed choices or step back from a given situation.”

People (in our case, university students and teachers) should, therefore, be fully informed when a decision is influenced by or relies on AI algorithms. In such instances, individuals should be able to ask for further explanation from the decision-maker using AI (e.g., a university body). Furthermore, individuals should be afforded the choice to present their case to a dedicated representative of the organisation in question who should have the power to reviset the decision and make corrections if necessary (UNESCO, 2022 , p. 22). Therefore, in the context of courses and other related education events, teachers should be clear about their utilisation of AI during the preparation of the material. Furthermore, instructors must unambiguously clarify ethical AI use in the classroom. Clear communication is essential about whether students have permission to utilise AI tools during assignments and how to report actual use.

As both UN and EU sources point out, raising awareness about and promoting basic AI literacy should be fostered as a means to empower people and reduce the digital divides and digital access inequalities resulting from the broad adoption of AI systems (EUHLEX, 2019 , p. 23; UNESCO, 2022 , p. 34).

Transparency and explainability in university first responses

The implementation of this principle seems to revolve around the challenge of decentralisation of university work, including the respect for teachers’ autonomy.

Teachers’ autonomy entails that teachers can decide if and to what extent they will allow their students to use AI platforms as part of their respective courses. This, however, comes with the essential corollary, that they must clearly communicate their decision to both students and university management in the course syllabus. To support transparency in this respect, many universities decided to establish 3-level- or 4-level admissibility frameworks (and even those who did not establish such multi-level systems, e.g., the University of Toronto, urge instructors to explicitly indicate in the course syllabus the expected use of AI) (University of Toronto, 2023 ).

The University of Auckland is among the universities that apply a fully laissez passer laissez-faire approach in this respect, meaning that there is a lack of centralised guidance or recommendations on this subject. They rather confer all practical decision-making of GAI use on course directors, adding that it is ultimately the student’s responsibility to correctly acknowledge the use of Gen-AI software (University of Auckland, 2023 ). Similarly, the University of Helsinki gives as much manoeuvring space to their staff as to allow them to change the course of action during the semester. As para 1 of their earlier quoted Guidelines stipulates, teachers are responsible for deciding how GAI can be used on a given course and are free to fully prohibit their use if they think it impedes the achievement of the learning objectives.

Colorado State University, for example, provides its teachers with 3 types of syllabus statement options (Colorado State University, 2023 ): (a) the prohibitive statement: whereby any work created, or inspired by AI agents is considered plagiarism and will not be tolerated; (b) the use-with-permission statement: whereby generative AI can be used but only as an exception and in line with the teachers further instruction, and (c) the abdication statement: where the teacher acknowledges that the course grade will also be a reflection of the students ability to harness AI technologies as part of their preparation for their future in a workforce that will increasingly require AI-literacy.

Macquarie University applies a similar system and provides it’s professors with an Assessment Checklist in which AI use can be either “Not permitted” or “Some use permitted” (meaning that the scope of use is limited while the majority of the work should be written or made by the student.), or “Full use permitted (with attribution)”, alluding to the adaptive use of AI tools, where the generated content is edited, mixed, adapted and integrated into the student’s final submission – with attribution of the source (Macquarie University, 2023 ).

The same approach is used at Monash University where generative AI tools can be: (a) used for all assessments in a specific unit; (b) cannot be used for any assessments; (c) some AI tools may be used selectively (Monash University, 2023b ).

The University of Cape Town (UCT) applies a 3-tier system not just in terms of the overall approach to the use or banning of GAI, but also with regard to specific assessment approaches recommended to teachers. As far as the former is concerned, they differentiate between the strategies of: (a) Avoiding (reverting to in-person assessment, where the use of AI isn’t possible); (b) Outrunning (devising an assessment that AI cannot produce); and (c) Embracing (discussing the appropriate use of AI with students and its ethical use to create the circumstances for authentic assessment outputs). The assessment possibilities, in turn, are categorised into easy, medium, and hard levels. Easy tasks include, e.g., generic short written assignments. Medium level might include examples such as personalised or context-based assessments (e.g. asking students to write to a particular audience whose knowledge and values must be considered or asking questions that would require them to give a response that draws from concepts that were learnt in class, in a lab, field trip…etc). In contrast, hard assessments include projects involving real-world applications, synchronous oral assessments, or panel assessments (University of Cape Town, 2023 ).

4-tier-systems are analogues. The only difference is that they break down the “middle ground”. Accordingly, the Chinese University of Hong Kong clarifies that Approach 1 (by default) means the prohibition of all use of AI tools; Approach 2 entails using AI tools only with prior permission; Approach 3 means using AI tools only with explicit acknowledgement; and Approach 4 is reserved for courses in which the use of AI tools is freely permitted with no acknowledgement needed (Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2023 ).

Similarly, the University of Delaware provides course syllabus statement examples for teachers including: (1) Prohibiting all use of AI tools; (2) Allowing their use only with prior permission; (3) Allow their use only with explicit acknowledgement; (4) Freely allow their use (University of Delaware, 2023 ).

The Technical University of Berlin also proposes a 4-tier system but uses a very different logic based on the practical knowledge one can obtain by using GAI. Accordingly, they divide AI tools as used to: (a) acquire professional competence; (b) learn to write scientifically; (c) be able to assess AI tools and compare them with scientific methods; d) professional use of AI tools in scientific work. Their corresponding guideline even quotes Art. 5 of the German Constitution referencing the freedom of teaching ( Freiheit der Lehre ), entailing that teachers should have the ability to decide for themselves which teaching aids they allow or prohibit. Footnote 17

This detailed approach, however, is rather the exception. According to the compilation on 6 May 2023 by Solis ( 2023 ), among the 100 largest German universities, 2% applied a general prohibition on the use of ChatGPT, 23% granted partial permission, 12% generally permitted its use, while 63% of the universities had none or only vague guidelines in this respect.

Main message and best practice: raising awareness

Overall, the best practice answer to the dilemma of transparency is the internal decentralisation of university work and the application of a “bottom-up” approach that respects the autonomy of university professors. Notwithstanding the potential existence of regulatory frameworks that set out binding rules for all citizens of an HE institution, this means providing university instructors with proper manoeuvring space to decide on their own how they would like to make AI use permissible in their courses, insofar as they communicate their decision openly.

Inclusiveness and diversity

Para. 34 of the Report by the European Parliament Committee on Culture and Education ( 2021 ) highlights that inclusive education can only be reached with the proactive presence of teachers and stresses that “AI technologies cannot be used to the detriment or at the expense of in-person education, as teachers must not be replaced by any AI or AI-related technologies”. Additionally, para. 20 of the same document highlights the need to create diverse teams of developers and engineers to work alongside the main actors in the educational, cultural, and audiovisual sectors in order to prevent gender or social bias from being inadvertently included in AI algorithms, systems, and applications.

This approach also underlines the need to consider the variety of different theories through which AI has been developed as a precursor to ensuring the application of the principle of diversity (UNESCO, 2022 , pp. 33–35), and it also recognises that a nuanced answer to AI-related challenges is only possible if affected stakeholders have an equal say in regulatory and design processes. An idea closely linked to the principle of fairness and the pledge to leave no one behind who might be affected by the outcome of using AI systems (EUHLEX, 2019 , pp. 18–19).

Therefore, in the context of higher education, the principle of inclusiveness aims to ensure that an institution provides the same opportunities to access the benefits of AI technologies for all its students, irrespective of their background, while also considering the particular needs of various vulnerable groups potentially marginalised based on age, gender, culture, religion, language, or disabilities. Footnote 18 Inclusiveness also alludes to stakeholder participation in internal university dialogues on the use and impact of AI systems (including students, teachers, administration and leadership) as well as in the constant evaluation of how these systems evolve. On a broader scale, it implies communication with policymakers on how higher education should accommodate itself to this rapidly changing environment (EUHLEX, 2019 , p. 23; UNESCO, 2022 , p. 35).

Inclusiveness and diversity in university first responses

Universities appear to be aware of the potential disadvantages for students who are either unfamiliar with GAI or who choose not to use it or use it in an unethical manner. As a result, many universities thought that the best way to foster inclusive GAI use was to offer specific examples of how teachers could constructively incorporate these tools into their courses.

The University of Waterloo, for example, recommends various methods that instructors can apply on sight, with the same set of tools for all students during their courses, which in itself mitigates the effects of any discrepancies in varying student backgrounds (University of Waterloo, 2023 ): (a) Give students a prompt during class, and the resulting text and ask them to critique and improve it using track changes; (b) Create two distinct texts and have students explain the flaws of each or combine them in some way using track changes; (c) Test code and documentation accuracy with a peer; or (d) Use ChatGPT to provide a preliminary summary of an issue as a jumping-off point for further research and discussion.

The University of Pittsburgh ( 2023 ) and Monash added similar recommendations to their AI guidelines (Monash University, 2023c ).

The University of Cambridge mentions under its AI-deas initiative a series of projects aimed to develop new AI methods to understand and address sensory, neural or linguistic challenges such as hearing loss, brain injury or language barriers to support people who find communicating a daily challenge in order to improve equity and inclusion. As they put it, “with AI we can assess and diagnose common language and communication conditions at scale, and develop technologies such as intelligent hearing aids, real-time machine translation, or other language aids to support affected individuals at home, work or school.” (University of Cambridge, 2023 ).

The homepage of the Technical University of Berlin (Technische Universität Berlin) displays ample and diverse materials, including videos Footnote 19 and other documents, as a source of inspiration for teachers on how to provide an equitable share of AI knowledge for their students (Glathe et al. 2023 ). More progressively, the university’s Institute of Psychology offers a learning modul called “Inclusive Digitalisation”, available for students enrolled in various degree programmes to understand inclusion and exclusion mechanisms in digitalisation. This modul touches upon topics such as barrier-free software design, mechanisms and reasons for digitalised discrimination or biases in corporate practices (their homepage specifically alludes to the fact that input and output devices, such as VR glasses, have exclusively undergone testing with male test subjects and that the development of digital products and services is predominantly carried out by men. The practical ramifications of such a bias result in input and output devices that are less appropriate for women and children) (Technische Universität Berlin, 2023 ).

Columbia recommends the practice of “scaffolding”, which is the process of breaking down a larger assignment into subtasks (Columbia University, 2023 ). In their understanding, this method facilitates regular check-ins and enables students to receive timely feedback throughout the learning process. Simultaneously, the implementation of scaffolding helps instructors become more familiar with students and their work as the semester progresses, allowing them to take additional steps in the case of students who might need more attention due to their vulnerable backgrounds or disabilities to complete the same tasks.

The Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, in its Recommendations, clearly links the permission of GAI use with the requirement of equal accessibility. They remind that if examiners require students to use AI for an examination, “students must be provided with access to these technologies free of charge and in compliance with data protection regulations” (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 2023b ).

Concurringly, the University of Cape Town also links inclusivity to accessibility. As they put it, “there is a risk that those with poorer access to connectivity, devices, data and literacies will get unequal access to the opportunities being provided by AI”, leading to the conclusion that the planning of the admissible use of GAI on campus should be cognizant of access inequalities (University of Cape Town, 2023 ). They also draw their staff’s attention to a UNESCO guide material containing useful methods to incorporate ChatGPT into the course, including methods such as the “Socratic opponent” (AI acts as an opponent to develop an argument), the “study buddy” (AI helps the student reflect on learning material) or the “dynamic assessor” (AI provides educators with a profile of each student’s current knowledge based on their interactions with ChatGPT) (UNESCO International Institute for Higher Education in Latin America and the Caribbean, 2023 ).

Finally, the National Autonomous University of Mexico’s Recommendations suggest using GAI tools, among others, for the purposes of community development. They suggest that such community-building activities, whether online or in live groups, kill two birds with one stone. On the one hand, they assist individuals in keeping their knowledge up to date with a topic that is constantly evolving, while it offers people from various backgrounds the opportunity to become part of communities in the process where they can share their experiences and build new relations (National Autonomous University of Mexico, 2023 ).

Main message and best practice: Proactive central support and the pledge to leave no one behind

To conclude, AI-related inclusivity for students is best fostered if the university does not leave its professors solely to their own resources to come up with diverging initiatives. The best practice example for this dilemma thus lies in a proactive approach that results in the elaboration of concrete teaching materials (e.g., subscriptions to AI tools to ensure equal accessibility for all students, templates, video tutorials, open-access answers to FAQs…etc.), specific ideas, recommendations and to support specialised programmes and collaborations with an inclusion-generating edge. With centrally offered resources and tools institutions seem to be able to ensure accessability irrespective of students’ background and financial abilities.

Discussion of the First Responses

While artificial intelligence and even its generative form has been around for a while, the arrival of application-ready LLMs – most notably ChatGPT has changed the game when it comes to grammatically correct large-scale and content-specific text generation. This has invoked an immediate reaction from the higher education community as the question arose as to how it may affect various forms of student performance evaluation (such as essay and thesis writing) (Chaudhry et al. 2023 ; Yu, 2023 ; Farazouli et al. 2024 ).

Often the very first reaction (a few months after the announcement of the availability of ChatGPT) was a ban on these tools and a potential return to hand-written evaluation and oral exams. In the institutions investigated under this research, notable examples may be most Australian universities (such as Monash) or even Oxford. On the other hand, even leading institutions have immediately embraced this new tool as a great potential helper of lecturers – the top name here being Harvard. Very early responses thus ranged widely – and have changed fast over the first six-eight months “post-ChatGPT”.

Over time responses from the institutions investigated started to put out clear guidelines and even created dedicated policies or modified existing ones to ensure a framework of acceptable use. The inspiration leading these early regulatory efforts was influenced by the international ethics documents reviewed in this paper. Institutions were aware of and relied on those guidelines. The main goal of this research was to shed light on the questions of how much and in what ways they took them on board regarding first responses. Most first reactions were based on “traditional” AI ethics and understanding of AI before LLMs and the generative revolution. First responses by institutions were not based on scientific literature or arguments from journal publications. Instead, as our results demonstrated it was based on publicly available ethical norms and guidelines published by well-known international organizations and professional bodies.

Conclusions, limitations and future research

Ethical dilemmas discussed in this paper were based on the conceptualisation embedded in relevant documents of various international fora. Each ethical dimension, while multifaceted in itself, forms a complex set of challenges that are inextricably intertwined with one another. Browsing university materials, the overall impression is that Universities primarily aim to explore and harness the potential benefits of generative AI but not with an uncritical mindset. They are focusing on the opportunities while simultaneously trying to address the emerging challenges in the field.

Accordingly, the main ethical imperative is that students must complete university assignments based on the knowledge and skills they acquired during their university education unless their instructors determine otherwise. Moral and legal responsibility in this regard always rests with human individuals. AI agents possess neither the legal standing nor the physical basis for moral agency, which makes them incapable of assuming such responsibilities. This “top-down” requirement is most often complemented by the “bottom-up” approach of providing instructors with proper maneuvering space to decide how they would like to make AI use permissible in their courses.

Good practice in human oversight could thus be achieved through a combination of preventive measures and soft, dialogue-based procedures. This latter category includes the simple act of teachers providing clear, written communications in their syllabi and engaging in a dialogue with their students to provide unambiguous and transparent instructions on the use of generative AI tools within their courses. Additionally, to prevent the unauthorised use of AI tools, changing course assessment methods by default is more effective than engaging in post-assessment review due to the unreliability of AI detection tools.

Among the many ethical dilemmas that generative AI tools pose to social systems, this paper focused on those pertaining to the pedagogical aspects of higher education. Due to this limitation, related fields, such as university research, were excluded from the scope of the analysis. However, research-related activities are certainly ripe for scientific scrutiny along the lines indicated in this study. Furthermore, only a limited set of institutions could be investigated, those who were the ”first respondents” to the set of issues covered by this study. Hereby, this paper hopes to inspire further research on the impact of AI tools on higher education. Such research could cover more institutions, but it would also be interesting to revisit the same institutions again to see how their stance and approach might have changed over time considering how fast this technology evolves and how much we learn about its capabilities and shortcomings.

Data availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. All documents referenced in this study are publicly available on the corresponding websites provided in the Bibliography or in the footnotes. No code has been developed as part of this research.

For the methodology behind the Shanghai Rankings see: https://www.shanghairanking.com/methodology/arwu/2022 . Accessed: 14 November 2023.

While the original French version was published in 1954, the first English translation is dated 1964.

As the evaluation by Bang et al. ( 2023 ) found, ChatGPT is only 63.41% accurate on average in ten different reasoning categories under logical reasoning, non-textual reasoning, and common-sense reasoning, making it an unreliable reasoner.

Source: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/proposal-regulation-laying-down-harmonised-rules-artificial-intelligence . Accessed: 14 November 2023.

Source https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2021-0127_EN.html . Accessed: 14 November 2023.

Source: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai . Accessed: 14 November 2023.

Source: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137 . Accessed: 14 November 2023.

Source: https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449#mainText . Accessed: 14 November 2023.

The editors-in-chief of Nature and Science stated that ChatGPT does not meet the standard for authorship: „ An attribution of authorship carries with it accountability for the work, which cannot be effectively applied to LLMs…. We would not allow AI to be listed as an author on a paper we published, and use of AI-generated text without proper citation could be considered plagiarism,” (Stokel-Walker, 2023 ). See also (Nature, 2023 ).

While there was an initial mistake that credited ChatGPT as an author of an academic paper, Elsevier issued a Corrigendum on the subject in February 2023 (O’Connor, 2023 ). Elsevier then clarified in its “Use of AI and AI-assisted technologies in writing for Elsevier” announcement, issued in March 2023, that “Authors should not list AI and AI-assisted technologies as an author or co-author, nor cite AI as an author”. See https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies-and-standards/the-use-of-generative-ai-and-ai-assisted-technologies-in-writing-for-elsevier . Accessed 23 Nov 2023.

The ethical guidelines of Wiley was updated on 28 February 2023 to clarify the publishing house’s stance on AI-generated content.

See e.g.: Section 2.4 of Princeton University’s Academic Regulations (Princeton University, 2023 ); the Code of Practice and Procedure regarding Misconduct in Research of the University of Oxford (University of Oxford, 2023a ); Section 2.1.1 of the Senate Guidelines on Academic Honesty of York University, enumerating cases of cheating (York University, 2011 ); Imperial College London’s Academic Misconduct Policy and Procedures document (Imperial College London, 2023a ); the Guidelines for seminar and term papers of the University of Vienna (Universität Wien, 2016 ); Para 4. § (1) - (4) of the Anti-plagiarism Regulation of the Corvinus University of Budapest (Corvinus University of Budapest, 2018 ), to name a few.

15 Art. 2 (c)(v) of the early Terms of Use of OpenAI Products (including ChatGPT) dated 14 March 2023 clarified the restrictions of the use of their products. Accordingly, users may not represent the output from their services as human-generated when it was not ( https://openai.com/policies/mar-2023-terms/ . Accessed 14 Nov 2023). Higher education institutions tend to follow suit with this policy. For example, the List of Student Responsibilities enumerated under the “Policies and Regulations” of the Harvard Summer School from 2023 reminds students that their “academic integrity policy forbids students to represent work as their own that they did not write, code, or create” (Harvard University, 2023 ).

A similar view was communicated by Taylor & Francis in a press release issued on 17 February 2023, in which they clarified that: “Authors are accountable for the originality, validity and integrity of the content of their submissions. In choosing to use AI tools, authors are expected to do so responsibly and in accordance with our editorial policies on authorship and principles of publishing ethics” (Taylor and Francis, 2023 ).

This is one of the rare examples where the guideline was adopted by the university’s senior management, in this case, the Academic Affairs Council.

It should be noted that abundant sources recommend harnessing AI tools’ opportunities to improve education instead of attempting to ban them. Heaven, among others, advocated on the pages of the MIT Technology Review the use of advanced chatbots such as ChatGPT as these could be used as “powerful classroom aids that make lessons more interactive, teach students media literacy, generate personalised lesson plans, save teachers time on admin” (Heaven, 2023 ).

This university based its policies on the recommendations of the German Association for University Didactics (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hochschuldidaktik). Consequently, they draw their students’ attention to the corresponding material, see: (Glathe et al. 2023 ).

For a detailed review of such groups affected by AI see the Artificial Intelligence and Democratic Values Index by the Center for AI and Digital Policy at https://www.caidp.org/reports/aidv-2023/ . Accessed 20 Nov 2023.

See for example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9W2Pd9GnpQ . Accessed: 14 November 2023.

Akram A (2023) An empirical study of AI generated text detection tools. ArXiv Prepr ArXiv231001423. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.01423

Alberti S (2022) Silas Alberti on X: ChatGPT is trained to not be evil. X Formerly Twitter, 1 December 2022. https://t.co/ZMFdqPs17i . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

Almaraz-López C, Almaraz-Menéndez F, López-Esteban C (2023) Comparative study of the attitudes and perceptions of university students in business administration and management and in education toward Artificial Intelligence. Educ. Sci. 13(6):609. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060609

Article   Google Scholar  

Bang Y, Cahyawijaya S, Lee N et al. (2023) A multitask, multilingual, multimodal evaluation of ChatGPT on reasoning, hallucination, and interactivity. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.04023

Baskara FXR (2023a) ChatGPT as a virtual learning environment: multidisciplinary simulations. In: Proceeding of the 3rd International Conference on Innovations in Social Sciences Education and Engineering, Paper 017. https://conference.loupiasconference.orag/index.php/icoissee3/index

Baskara FXR (2023b) The promises and pitfalls of using ChatGPT for self-determined learning in higher education: An argumentative review. Pros. Semin. Nas. Fakultas Tarb. dan. Ilmu Kegur. IAIM Sinjai 2:95–101. https://doi.org/10.47435/sentikjar.v2i0.1825

Bauer E, Greisel M, Kuznetsov I et al. (2023) Using natural language processing to support peer‐feedback in the age of artificial intelligence: A cross‐disciplinary framework and a research agenda. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 54(5):1222–1245. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13336

Blalock D (2022) Here are all the ways to get around ChatGPT’s safeguards: [1/n]. X Formerly Twitter, 13 December 2022. https://twitter.com/davisblalock/status/1602600453555961856 . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

Chan CKY (2023) A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. Int J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 20(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3

Chaudhry IS, Sarwary SAM, El Refae GA, Chabchoub H (2023) Time to revisit existing student’s performance evaluation approach in higher education sector in a new era of ChatGPT—A case study. Cogent Educ. 10(1):2210461. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2210461

Chaudhry MA, Cukurova M, Luckin R (2022) A transparency index framework for AI in education. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp 195–198. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/bstcf

Chinese University of Hong Kong (2023) Use of Artificial Intelligence tools in teaching, learning and assessments - A guide for students. https://www.aqs.cuhk.edu.hk/documents/A-guide-for-students_use-of-AI-tools.pdf . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

Colorado State University (2023) What should a syllabus statement on AI look like? https://tilt.colostate.edu/what-should-a-syllabus-statement-on-ai-look-like/ . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

Columbia University (2023) Considerations for AI tools in the classroom. https://ctl.columbia.edu/resources-and-technology/resources/ai-tools/ . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

Corrêa NK, Galvão C, Santos JW et al. (2023) Worldwide AI ethics: A review of 200 guidelines and recommendations for AI governance. Patterns 4(10):100857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100857

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Corvinus University of Budapest (2018) Anti-Plagiarism rules. https://www.uni-corvinus.hu/contents/uploads/2020/11/I.20_Plagiumszabalyzat_2018_junius_19_EN.6b1.pdf . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

Cotton DR, Cotton PA, Shipway JR (2024) Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int 61(2):228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Crompton H, Burke D (2023) Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. Int J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 20(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8

Dhaor A (2023) India will regulate AI, ensure data privacy, says Rajeev Chandrasekhar. Hindustan Times, 12 October 2023. https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/noida-news/india-will-regulate-ai-ensure-data-privacy-says-rajeev-chandrasekhar-101697131022456.html . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

Ellul J (1964) The technological society. Vintage Books

EUHLEX (2019) Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI | Shaping Europe’s digital future. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

European Commission (2021) Proposal for a Regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence | Shaping Europe’s digital future. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/proposal-regulation-laying-down-harmonised-rules-artificial-intelligence . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

European Parliament - Committee on Culture and Education (2021) Report on artificial intelligence in education, culture and the audiovisual sector | A9-0127/2021. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2021-0127_EN.html . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

Farazouli A, Cerratto-Pargman T, Bolander-Laksov K, McGrath C (2024) Hello GPT! Goodbye home examination? An exploratory study of AI chatbots impact on university teachers’ assessment practices. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 49(3):363–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2241676

Farrokhnia M, Banihashem SK, Noroozi O, Wals A (2023) A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int 61(3):460–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846

Ferguson R, Hoel T, Scheffel M, Drachsler H (2016) Guest editorial: Ethics and privacy in learning analytics. J. Learn Anal. 3(1):5–15. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.31.2

Future of Life Institute (2023) Pause giant AI experiments: An open letter. https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause-giant-ai-experiments/ . Accessed 15 Nov 2023

Gamage KA, Dehideniya SC, Xu Z, Tang X (2023) ChatGPT and higher education assessments: more opportunities than concerns? J Appl Learn Teach 6(2). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.32

Gimpel H, Hall K, Decker S, et al. (2023) Unlocking the power of generative AI models and systems such as GPT-4 and ChatGPT for higher education: A guide for students and lecturers. Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences 2023, 02:2146. http://opus.uni-hohenheim.de/frontdoor.php?source_opus=2146&la=en

Glathe A, Mörth M, Riedel A (2023) Vorschläge für Eigenständigkeitserklärungen bei möglicher Nutzung von KI-Tools. European University Viadrina. https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-euv/files/1326/Forschendes-Lernen-mit-KI_SKILL.pdf . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

Harvard University (2023) Student Responsibilities. Harvard Summer School 2023. https://summer.harvard.edu/academic-opportunities-support/policies-and-regulations/student-responsibilities/ . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

Heaven WD (2023) ChatGPT is going to change education, not destroy it. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/04/06/1071059/chatgpt-change-not-destroy-education-openai/ . Accessed 14 Nov 2023

Hillier M (2023) Turnitin Artificial Intelligence writing detection. https://teche.mq.edu.au/2023/03/turnitin-artificial-intelligence-writing-detection/ . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

Howard SK, Mozejko A (2015) Considering the history of digital technologies in education. In: Henderson M, Romeo G (eds) Teaching and digital technologies: Big issues and critical questions. Cambridge University Press, Port Melbourne, Australia, pp 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316091968.017

Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (2023a) ChatGPT & Co: Empfehlungen für das Umgehen mit Künstlicher Intelligenz in Prüfungen. https://www.hu-berlin.de/de/pr/nachrichten/september-2023/nr-2397-1 . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (2023b) Empfehlungen zur Nutzung von Künstlicher Intelligenz in Studienleistungen und Prüfungen an der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. https://www.hu-berlin.de/de/pr/nachrichten/september-2023/hu_empfehlungen_ki-in-pruefungen_20230905.pdf . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

Ilieva G, Yankova T, Klisarova-Belcheva S et al. (2023) Effects of generative chatbots in higher education. Information 14(9):492. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14090492

Imperial College London (2023a) Academic misconduct policy and procedure. https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/administration-and-support-services/registry/academic-governance/public/academic-policy/academic-integrity/Academic-Misconduct-Policy-and-Procedure-v1.3-15.03.23.pdf . Accessed 14 Nov 2023

Imperial College London (2023b) College guidance on the use of generative AI tools. https://www.imperial.ac.uk/about/leadership-and-strategy/provost/vice-provost-education/generative-ai-tools-guidance/ . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

Ivanov S (2023) The dark side of artificial intelligence in higher education. Serv. Ind. J. 43(15–16):1055–1082. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2023.2258799

Johns Hopkins University (2023) CSCI 601.771: Self-supervised Models. https://self-supervised.cs.jhu.edu/sp2023/ . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

Khosravi H, Shum SB, Chen G et al. (2022) Explainable artificial intelligence in education. Comput Educ. Artif. Intell. 3:100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100074

Liao SM (2020) The moral status and rights of Artificial Intelligence. In: Liao SM (ed) Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press, pp 480–503. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190905033.003.0018

Lim T, Gottipati S, Cheong M (2023) Artificial Intelligence in today’s education landscape: Understanding and managing ethical issues for educational assessment. Research Square Preprint. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2696273/v1

Limo FAF, Tiza DRH, Roque MM et al. (2023) Personalized tutoring: ChatGPT as a virtual tutor for personalized learning experiences. Soc. Space 23(1):293–312. https://socialspacejournal.eu/article-page/?id=176

Google Scholar  

Liu S (2023) India’s AI Regulation Dilemma. The Diplomat, 27 October 2023. https://thediplomat.com/2023/10/indias-ai-regulation-dilemma/ . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

Macquarie University (2023) Academic integrity vs the other AI (Generative Artificial Intelligence). https://teche.mq.edu.au/2023/03/academic-integrity-vs-the-other-ai-generative-artificial-intelligence/ . Accessed 14 Nov 2023

Memarian B, Doleck T (2023) Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics (FATE) in Artificial Intelligence (AI), and higher education: A systematic review. Comput Educ Artif Intell 100152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100152

Mhlanga D (2023) Open AI in Education, the Responsible and Ethical Use of ChatGPT Towards Lifelong Learning. SSRN Electron J 4354422. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4354422

Miller GE (2023) eLearning and the Transformation of Higher Education. In: Miller GE, Ives K (eds) Leading the eLearning Transformation of Higher Education. Routledge, pp 3–23. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003445623-3

Mollick ER, Mollick L (2022) New modes of learning enabled by AI chatbots: Three methods and assignments. SSRN Electron J 4300783. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4300783

Monash University (2023a) Generative AI and assessment: Designing assessment for achievement and demonstration of learning outcomes. https://www.monash.edu/learning-teaching/teachhq/Teaching-practices/artificial-intelligence/generative-ai-and-assessment . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

Monash University (2023b) Policy and practice guidance around acceptable and responsible use of AI technologies. https://www.monash.edu/learning-teaching/teachhq/Teaching-practices/artificial-intelligence/policy-and-practice-guidance-around-acceptable-and-responsible-use-of-ai-technologies . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

Monash University (2023c) Choosing assessment tasks. https://www.monash.edu/learning-teaching/teachhq/Assessment/choosing-assessment-tasks . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

National Autonomous University of Mexico (2023) Recomendaciones para el uso de Inteligencia Artificial Generativa en la docencia. https://cuaed.unam.mx/descargas/recomendaciones-uso-iagen-docencia-unam-2023.pdf . Accessed 14 Oct 2023

Nature (2023) Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. Nature 613:612. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00191-1 . Editorial

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Nicol DJ, Macfarlane‐Dick D (2006) Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud. High. Educ. 31(2):199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Nikolinakos NT (2023) Ethical Principles for Trustworthy AI. In: Nikolinakos NT (ed) EU Policy and Legal Framework for Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Related Technologies -The AI Act. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, pp 101–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27953-9

O’Connor S (2023) Corrigendum to “Open artificial intelligence platforms in nursing education: Tools for academic progress or abuse?” [Nurse Educ. Pract. 66 (2023) 103537]. Nurse Educ. Pr. 67:103572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103572

OECD (2019) Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449#mainText . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

OpenAI (2022) Introducing ChatGPT. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt . Accessed 14 Nov 2022

Paek S, Kim N (2021) Analysis of worldwide research trends on the impact of artificial intelligence in education. Sustainability 13(14):7941. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147941

Perkins M (2023) Academic Integrity considerations of AI Large Language Models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. J. Univ. Teach. Learn Pr. 20(2):07. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07

Princeton University (2023) Academic Regulations: Rights, rules, responsibilities. https://rrr.princeton.edu/2023/students-and-university/24-academic-regulations . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

Qadir J (2023) Engineering education in the era of ChatGPT: Promise and pitfalls of generative AI for education. In: 2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). IEEE, pp 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/educon54358.2023.10125121

Rasul T, Nair S, Kalendra D et al. (2023) The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions. J. Appl Learn Teach. 6(1):41–56. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29

Ray PP (2023) ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet Things Cyber-Phys. Syst. 3:121–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003

Reiser RA (2001) A history of instructional design and technology: Part I: A history of instructional media. Educ. Technol. Res Dev. 49(1):53–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504506

Roose K (2023) GPT-4 is exciting and scary. New York Times, 15 March 2023. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/15/technology/gpt-4-artificial-intelligence-openai.html . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

Rudolph J, Tan S, Tan S (2023) War of the chatbots: Bard, Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Ernie and beyond. The new AI gold rush and its impact on higher education. J. Appl Learn Teach. 6(1):364–389. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.23

Solis T (2023) Die ChatGPT-Richtlinien der 100 größten deutschen Universitäten. Scribbr, 6 May 2023. https://www.scribbr.de/ki-tools-nutzen/chatgpt-universitaere-richtlinien/ . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

Stokel-Walker C (2023) ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: Many scientists disapprove. Nature 613:620–621. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z

Article   ADS   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Sweeney S (2023) Who wrote this? Essay mills and assessment – Considerations regarding contract cheating and AI in higher education. Int J. Manag Educ. 21(2):100818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100818

Taylor and Francis (2023) Taylor & Francis clarifies the responsible use of AI tools in academic content creation. Taylor Francis Newsroom, 17 February 2023. https://newsroom.taylorandfrancisgroup.com/taylor-francis-clarifies-the-responsible-use-of-ai-tools-in-academic-content-creation/ . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

Technische Universität Berlin (2023) Inklusive Digitalisierung Modul. https://moseskonto.tu-berlin.de/moses/modultransfersystem/bolognamodule/beschreibung/anzeigen.html?nummer=51021&version=2&sprache=1 . Accessed 05 Aug 2024

Tokyo Institute of Technology (2023) Policy on Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Learning. https://www.titech.ac.jp/english/student/students/news/2023/066592.html . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

Turnitin (2023) Turnitin announces AI writing detector and AI writing resource center for educators. https://www.turnitin.com/press/turnitin-announces-ai-writing-detector-and-ai-writing-resource-center-for-educators . Accessed 14 Nov 2023

Uchiyama S, Umemura K, Morita Y (2023) Large Language Model-based system to provide immediate feedback to students in flipped classroom preparation learning. ArXiv Prepr ArXiv230711388. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.11388

UNESCO (2022) Recommendation on the ethics of Artificial Intelligence. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137 . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

UNESCO International Institute for Higher Education in Latin America and the Caribbean (2023) ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence in higher education. https://www.iesalc.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/ChatGPT-and-Artificial-Intelligence-in-higher-education-Quick-Start-guide_EN_FINAL.pdf . Accessed 14 Nov 2023

Universität Wien (2016) Guidelines for seminar and term papers. https://bda.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/p_bda/Teaching/PaperGuidlines.pdf . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

University of Auckland (2023) Advice for students on using Generative Artificial Intelligence in coursework. https://www.auckland.ac.nz/en/students/forms-policies-and-guidelines/student-policies-and-guidelines/academic-integrity-copyright/advice-for-student-on-using-generative-ai.html . Accessed 24 Nov 2023

University of Boston (2023) Using Generative AI in coursework. https://www.bu.edu/cds-faculty/culture-community/gaia-policy/ . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

University of Cambridge (2023) Artificial Intelligence and teaching, learning and assessment. https://www.cambridgeinternational.org/support-and-training-for-schools/artificial-intelligence/ . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

University of Cape Town (2023) Staff Guide - Assessment and academic integrity in the age of AI. https://docs.google.com/document/u/0/d/1o5ZIOBjPsP6Nh2VIlM56_kcuqB-Y7xTf/edit?pli=1&usp=embed_facebook . Accessed 14 Nov 2023

University of Delaware (2023) Considerations for using and addressing advanced automated tools in coursework and assignments. https://ctal.udel.edu/advanced-automated-tools/ . Accessed 14 Nov 2023

University of Helsinki (2023) Using AI to support learning | Instructions for students. https://studies.helsinki.fi/instructions/article/using-ai-support-learning . Accessed 24 Nov 2023

University of Oxford (2023a) Code of practice and procedure on academic integrity in research. https://hr.admin.ox.ac.uk/academic-integrity-in-research . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

University of Oxford (2023b) Unauthorised use of AI in exams and assessment. https://academic.admin.ox.ac.uk/article/unauthorised-use-of-ai-in-exams-and-assessment . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

University of Pittsburgh (2023) Generative AI Resources for Faculty. https://teaching.pitt.edu/generative-ai-resources-for-faculty/ . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

University of Toronto (2019) Code of behaviour on academic matters. https://governingcouncil.utoronto.ca/secretariat/policies/code-behaviour-academic-matters-july-1-2019 . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

University of Toronto (2023) ChatGPT and Generative AI in the classroom. https://www.viceprovostundergrad.utoronto.ca/strategic-priorities/digital-learning/special-initiative-artificial-intelligence/ . Accessed 20 Nov 2023

University of Waterloo (2023) Artificial Intelligence at UW. https://uwaterloo.ca/associate-vice-president-academic/artificial-intelligence-uw . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

University of Zürich (2023) ChatGPT. https://ethz.ch/en/the-eth-zurich/education/educational-development/ai-in-education/chatgpt.html . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

Wach K, Duong CD, Ejdys J et al. (2023) The dark side of generative artificial intelligence: A critical analysis of controversies and risks of ChatGPT. Entrep. Bus. Econ. Rev. 11(2):7–24. https://doi.org/10.15678/eber.2023.110201

Wagner G (2018) Robot liability. SSRN Electron J 3198764. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3198764

Wiley (2023) Best practice guidelines on research integrity and publishing ethics. https://authorservices.wiley.com/ethics-guidelines/index.html . Accessed 20 Nov 2023

Yan L, Sha L, Zhao L et al. (2023) Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education: A systematic scoping review. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 55(1):90–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13370

York University (2011) Senate Policy on Academic Honesty. https://www.yorku.ca/secretariat/policies/policies/academic-honesty-senate-policy-on/ . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

York University Senate (2023) Academic Integrity and Generative Artificial Intelligence Technology. https://www.yorku.ca/unit/vpacad/academic-integrity/wp-content/uploads/sites/576/2023/03/Senate-ASCStatement_Academic-Integrity-and-AI-Technology.pdf . Accessed 23 Nov 2023

Yu H (2023) Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching. Front Psychol. 14:1181712. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181712

Download references

The authors have received no funding, grants, or other support for the research reported here. Open access funding provided by Corvinus University of Budapest.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Covinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary

Attila Dabis & Csaba Csáki

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

AD had established the initial idea and contributed to the collection of ethical standards as well as to the collection of university policy documents. Also contributed to writing the initial draft and the final version. CsCs had reviewed and clarified the initial concept and then developed the first structure including methodological considerations. Also contributed to the collection of university policy documents as well as to writing the second draft and the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Attila Dabis .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This research did not involve any human participants or animals and required no ethical approval.

Informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors. No consent was required as no private data was collected or utilized.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Dabis, A., Csáki, C. AI and ethics: Investigating the first policy responses of higher education institutions to the challenge of generative AI. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 11 , 1006 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03526-z

Download citation

Received : 21 February 2024

Accepted : 29 July 2024

Published : 06 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03526-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

• DOI: 10.56557/upjoz/2024/v45i164310
• Corpus ID: 271666468

Impact of Urban Lighting on Insects: A Legal Perspective on Environmental Concerns

• Bhattacharyya P. , Banerjee K. , Adhikary S.
• Published in Uttar Pradesh Journal of… 31 July 2024
• Environmental Science, Law

Related Papers

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers

How Do Corporations Assess and Report Their Physical Risks from Climate Change?

Aug 6, 2024, 2:45 PM

Businesses are facing pressure, from the public and private sector, to report their climate change risks, sparking debate over the efficacy and scope of such disclosures. Most recently, a March 2024 rule issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission would require reporting companies to disclose climate-related financial risks, but the SEC has delayed implementation in light of several legal challenges to the final rule.

A new white paper by the Energy, Environment, and Land Use Program at Vanderbilt Law School spotlights the often-overlooked role that physical climate risk – the exposure of assets and operations to climate-induced hazards – plays in private and public disclosures.

“ The Boundaries of Corporate Physical Climate Risk: Definitions and Frameworks ,” authored by EELU Program Director Caroline Cox and 2023-2024 EELU Fellow Chick Hallinan ’25, examines the way firms measure physical climate risk and assesses the current state of physical climate risk disclosure. It also points to existing federal laws that might serve as indicators of how regulators might approach the topic in the future.

Debates aside, climate-related physical risks will have a profound impact across the economy, from investment banking strategies to home purchases. “What is included in a physical climate risk report and what is excluded will profoundly shape the way businesses, investors, and consumers interact,” the authors write.

Public and private governance regimes have tried to mitigate this lack of correlation by imposing standards, mainly developed on a private level before being adopted and adapted in the public sphere. The paper explores private frameworks like the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosure and public ones from California, the SEC, and the EU. It concludes by identifying which aspects of physical climate risk have and have not reached a consensus and proposes a model for identifying one important area of divergence: materiality.

Physical climate risk has a growing presence in corporate disclosures in the U.S. and abroad. While gaps in standardization make “a universal definition of reportable physical risks elusive,” the authors note that “there are areas of convergence.”

“As reporting regimes mature, additional insight into what constitutes a reportable physical climate risk will emerge.”

Explore Story Topics

• Climate Change Scholarship
• Environmental Law Scholarship
• Uncategorized
• Vanderbilt Law News
• Home Page Sidebar
• newsroom sidebar
• research news featured

Keep Reading

Research Finds That Household Actions May Contribute 40% of Cumulative Emissions Reductions under the IIJA and IRA

Three New Federal Laws Could Dramatically Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2030. Will They Deliver?

How Zoning Affects Greenhouse Gas Emissions

In-Text Citations

In scholarly writing, it is essential to acknowledge how others contributed to your work. By following the principles of proper citation, writers ensure that readers understand their contribution in the context of the existing literature—how they are building on, critically examining, or otherwise engaging the work that has come before.

APA Style provides guidelines to help writers determine the appropriate level of citation and how to avoid plagiarism and self-plagiarism.

We also provide specific guidance for in-text citation, including formats for interviews, classroom and intranet sources, and personal communications; in-text citations in general; and paraphrases and direct quotations.

Academic Writer ®

Master academic writing with APA’s essential teaching and learning resource

Course Adoption

Teaching APA Style? Become a course adopter of the 7th edition Publication Manual

Instructional Aids

Guides, checklists, webinars, tutorials, and sample papers for anyone looking to improve their knowledge of APA Style

Publishing in Law Reviews and Journals

Publishing in law reviews and journals-home, deciding where to publish, article submission services, author rights, sharing and depositing your papers, conferences and symposia, books, articles and other resources, writing competitions, videos of classes and presentations, tutorial and quiz, getting help.

Have you thought about trying to publish in a law review or journal?  This guide contains a variety of resources to help you in that process.  

Submit to DASH, Harvard University's open access repository

If you are a current HLS student, deposit your work in  DASH  (Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard).

This guide is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License .

You may reproduce any part of it for noncommercial purposes as long as credit is included and it is shared in the same manner. 

Comparing Law Journal Impact Factor/Prestige

Over the years, many ranking systems for law journals have evolved, incorporating a variety of methodologies and factors, including frequency of citation, prominence of author, etc..  Although such rankings can be useful for getting an idea of the prestige or "impact factor" of a journal, they should be taken with a grain of salt and in consideration of other factors that might be important to you.  Ranking of journals is frequently a subject of articles and blog postings.  Play close attention to how the data was compiled---e.g. through database searches, opinions of experts in the field, etc..

Law Journal Submissions and Ranking The Washington & Lee Law School Library produces this site that lists law journals by subject, country and other factors, and allows users to rank journals by impact factor or immediacy index. (Both are based on citation counts more or less, see ranking methodology ). Provides contact and submission information.

Allen Rostron & Nancy Levit,   I nformation for Submitting Articles to Law Reviews & Journals .

Bridget J. Crawford,  Information for Submitting to Online Law Review Companions .

Michael Goodyear,  Information for Submitting Articles to Specialty & Non-Flagship Law Journals .

Nancy Levit et al,  Submission of Law Student Articles for Publication .

Clarivate Journal Citation Reports (Harvard ID and PIN required) Ranks journals in a wide range of disciplines including about 100 law journals. Rankings are based on citation counts in thousands of journals in the sciences and social sciences. From the home page, click Categories , then click  Social Sciences, General.  From the expanded menu, click  Law.

Most Cited Journals on HeinOnline This top 100 list is based on HeinOnline's citator feature called ScholarCheck. You can also use ScholarCheck to create your own metric. They also have a collection of most-cited law journals .

Eigenfactor This system ranks journals as Google ranks websites (mapping relationship structures). The coverage of law is not comprehensive, but it is useful for looking at journals in the context of the social sciences generally.

Google Scholar Metrics Google Scholar provides five-year h-index and h-median numbers for ranking purposes.

Bryce Clayton Newell, Law Journal Meta-Ranking 2023 Edition

Measuring Quality - Writing for and Publishing in Law Reviews (Choosing Where to Submit and Publish)   A great guide compiled by the Gallagher Library at the University of Washington Law School, explaining the most common ranking factors, including important an extensive selection of articles and surveys.

Brian T. Detweiler, May It Please the Court: A Longitudinal Study of Judicial Citation to Academic Legal Periodicals

Accessibility of the Content

Is the journal available in places where scholars will find, and hopefully cite to, its contents? Some considerations include:

Is it open access or freely available? Do you encounter a paywall when trying to read an article's full-text? Check the journal's website for contents and the journal's policy. You can also check the  Directory of Open Access Journals , but the coverage for law is not extensive. 

Is it in Westlaw, Lexis, and other subscription databases? 

Is it indexed by Legaltrac (a.k.a Legal Resource Index)? See title list  (downloads as an Excel file).

Is it indexed by Index to Legal Periodicals and Books? See title list .

Is it included in Tables of Contents Services, such as Current Index to Legal Periodicals? See title list  on HeinOnline (Harvard Key required).

Selected Directories of Law Journals

In addition to Washington and Lee's Law Review Submissions and Ranking website , there are several directories that can be used to find out more information about law journals that are currently being published.

• Ulrich's Periodicals Not specific to law, Ulrich's describes periodicals in all disciplines, worldwide. Most comprehensive source for finding law-related serial publications. Includes newspapers, bar journals, and trades. Usually provides a description, contact information, circulation figures, abstracting and indexing services, and links to publishers' sites. Use Advanced Search to find appropriate journals. At minimum, you may want to limit Country of Publication to United States, Subject to law, Status to Active, and Serial Type to Academic/Scholarly.
• Directory for Successful Publishing in Legal Periodicals Call Number: Reference K 36.J69 1997x A bit out of date but still useful. Covers about 500 major law journals. Describes the journal's particular focus, preferred manuscript style; acceptance rates, details about the review process, and occasionally explains factors in manuscript rejections.

Short-Form Publishing

Many law reviews now have blogs and websites that accept shorter submissions. See Information for Submitting to Online Law Review Companions by Bridget J. Crawford . Washington & Lee also lists selected ones on its   Law Journals: Submissions and Ranking website .

Scholastica

Hls student scholastica funding.

The Harvard Law School subsidizes Scholastica journal submissions for current students with publishable academic work. 

Eligibility

To access this support, you must receive sign-off from your faculty supervisor that your work is ready for submission to law reviews and journals.

Before we activate your account, we ask you to complete a tutorial and quiz about submission strategy. You may also want to set up an appointment with a librarian to discuss strategy and how to select journals for submission. We encourage you to review the  Law Library’s Guide to Publishing in Law Reviews and Journals.

How to Participate

Send a request using your Harvard email to [email protected] . Include or separately forward the approval from your faculty supervisor. Your name must be in the body of the email from your faculty supervisor. 

How it Works

When you contact us, we will send you a link to an online tutorial and quiz. Once you have completed the quiz, and we receive your request and faculty approval,  Library staff will add you to our Scholastica account. Once you acknowledge our invitation, you will be free to begin your submissions. Your account will remain active until you reach your maximum number of submissions or expiration after 10 months past your graduation date, whichever comes first.

Submission Levels

• SJD– up to 50 submissions per academic year during your time at HLS. Unused submissions will roll over to the next year. 
• LLMs – up to 50 submissions  total during your year at HLS.
• JDs – up to 50 submissions total during your three years at HLS.
• Submissions may be used up to 10 months after graduation.

Note:  Please keep track of your journal submissions and notify us when you reach 50, as Scholastica does not limit them automatically. 

JOURNAL POLICIES FOR SUBMISSION

Sherpa Services  is a searchable database of publisher's general policies regarding copyright and the self-archiving of journal articles on the web and in Open Access repositories.  Each entry provides a summary of the publisher's policy, including what version of an article can be deposited, where it can be deposited, and any conditions that are attached to that deposit. 

How You Can Submit an Article

Journals have different policies for receiving submissions.  Your best starting place is to check the journal's website, which usually provides details about its policy.  We have collected on this page some potential resources that you can use for submitting an article.

Learn about Author Rights

If you do get an acceptance for publication, you might be asked to sign an author agreement/contract with the publisher.  Some standard agreements require things such as transferring copyright or prohibiting what you can do with your own work.  See Benjamin J. Keele,  Advising Faculty on Law Journal Publication Agreements  for a brief basic review of terms to consider.

SPARC Author Rights

• Author Rights and the SPARC Author Addendum

Scholar's Copyright Addendum Engine

Hosted by Science Commons, you can enter the article information and choose the rights you want to retain and generate a standard addendum on pdf  to provide for the publisher's consideration.  http://scholars.sciencecommons.org/  

Keep Your Copyrights

Developed by the Kernochan Center for Law, Media, and the Arts and the Program on Law & Technology at Columbia Law School, this website provides a good introduction to author rights and sample publication agreements categorized by level of creator-friendliness.

• https://kernochan.law.columbia.edu/content/keep-your-copyrights

Creative Commons Licenses

Creative Commons (CC)  provides creators with standardized licenses that describe, in plain language, what actions are and are not allowed with their content.

• Read more about the various licenses on the CC website .
• The CC License Chooser tool can help you pick a license that's right for you and your work.

Resources to Learn about Journal Copyright and Self-Archiving Policies

Journal publication agreements vary widely, but there are some resources that help authors get an idea of what a journal's standard policy has typically been.  While the journal publication agreement itself must always be reviewed, looking at these resources at the time of submission can be helpful, particularly if it is important for you to retain certain rights in your work.  Regardless of what a publisher's standard agreement states, you can always try to negotiate different terms. If the publisher is unwilling to budge from its position, you then need to decide how important it is to you to publish in that particular journal.

• Sherpa Services This website lists contains summaries of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's agreement.
• Benjamin Keele, Copyright Provisions in Law Journal Publication Agreements
• Dan Hunter, Walled Gardens
• Brian Frye, Christopher Ryan, Franklin Runge, An Empirical Study of Law Journal Copyright Practices

Working papers and self-archiving

Regardless of your plans for formal publication of your work, you are encouraged to deposit your student papers with the university's open access repository, DASH . Doing so will enable you to share your work with other members of the Harvard community, as well as the world at large.  If you are concerned about making your content available open on the Internet, you also have the option of submitting only the metadata (e.g. title, your name). See HLS Student Papers Series in DASH for details.

You might also want to deposit your paper (or its metadata) in SSRN or another working paper repository to associate yourself with the work and make it available for feedback from others in the field.  Scholars frequently make their "working papers" or drafts available for early feedback and reaction from colleagues.

The SSRN Legal Scholarship Network hosts research paper series for academic and other research organizations such as the  Harvard Law School, Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series .  Scholars can publish their work in a large number of law-related e-journals within SSRN's Legal Scholarship Network's four areas including Law  & Economics, Public Law & Legal Theory, Legal Studies and Law Research Center Papers. 

Author Identification

Giving the proper author credit for research is the goal of Open Researcher and Contributor ID ( ORCID ) iDs. ORCID is a non-profit, community-driven, Open Access effort to create a registry of unique researcher identifiers.

“ORCID provides a persistent digital identifier that distinguishes you from every other researcher and, through integration in key research workflows such as manuscript and grant submission, supports automated linkages between you and your professional activities ensuring that your work is recognized.”

You can create a new ORCID or link your existing ORCID using Harvard ORCID Connect , HarvardKey required.

Research Profile Services

• Scholars@Harvard
• Google Scholar Citations
• Academia.edu

Conference Alerts

• Conference Alerts This resource tracks academic conferences worldwide, including ones concerning law. E-mail alerts are available.
• All Conference Alert Lists conferences for a variety of disciplines, including law. Can filter conference list by location and month.

Selected books

Other Guides

• Writing for and Publishing in Law Reviews (Gallagher Law Library, University of Washington School of Law) This very extensive guide covers various aspects of publishing.
• Brian D. Galle, The Law Review Submission Process: A Guide for (and by) the Perplexed
• Scholastica Resources Run by the submission service Scholastica, there are various resources/tips (written from the perspective of a service provider) including their blogs .

Blogs/Current Awareness

• Brian Leiter Law School Reports
• PrawfsBlawg
• Faculty Lounge

HLS also offers many prizes for its students papers generally. See Harvard Law School Writing Prizes for more information.

The American Bar Association (ABA) offers a number of writing competitions for young lawyers and law students, view the full list on their website . 

See also the American University Pence Law Library guide to writing competitions for further resources. 

• Tutorial and quiz to obtain Scholastica account (HarvardKey required)

Contact Us!

  Ask Us!  Submit a question or search our knowledge base.

Chat with us!  Chat   with a librarian (HLS only)

Email: [email protected]

 Contact Historical & Special Collections at [email protected]

  Meet with Us   Schedule an online consult with a Librarian

Hours  Library Hours

Classes  View  Training Calendar  or  Request an Insta-Class

 Text  Ask a Librarian, 617-702-2728

 Call  Reference & Research Services, 617-495-4516

• Last Updated: Jul 19, 2024 4:36 PM
• URL: https://guides.library.harvard.edu/gettingpublished

Harvard University Digital Accessibility Policy

• Center for the Constitution and the Catholic Intellectual Tradition (CIT)
• Center for Law and the Human Person
• Center for Religious Liberty (CRL)
• Comparative and International Law Institute (CILI)
• Compliance, Investigations, and Corporate Responsibility Program (CICR)
• Law and Public Policy Program (LPP)
• Law and Technology Institute (LTI)
• Securities Law Program (SLP)

Columbus School of Law

• 2024 Catholic Law News

“Traditional Judicial Power and Doctrinal Development” Catholic University Law Review Spring Symposium Call for Papers

In recent years, Justice Thomas has argued for reconsidering facial challenge doctrine , overbreadth doctrine , third-party standing doctrine , associational standing doctrine , and statutory severability doctrine . These doctrines have also played an important role in the resolution of cases involving the First Amendment and the separation of powers , two areas in which the Roberts Court has been relatively active in substantive doctrinal development. Disagreements among other Justices over standing doctrine and the requirements of traditional remedial doctrine have also emerged. Judicial reliance on traditional understandings of judicial power has led to a variety of outcomes in the lower courts on matters such as Article III standing , severability , and the propriety of preliminary injunctive relief . 

The editors of the Catholic University Law Review will bring together scholars, jurists, and practitioners in Washington, DC for our Spring Symposium on March 28, 2025 to explore how traditional conceptions of judicial power relate to the judicial capacity to facilitate, moderate, prevent, or otherwise influence doctrinal development. We invite paper, panel, or presentation proposals that address doctrines such as standing, the distinction between facial and as-applied challenges, statutory severability, and the availability and scope of judicial remedies. Proposals may address these areas on their own or may address the relationships among these and similar doctrines in defining the scope of judicial power. Please submit a titled, approximately 500-word abstract of paper, panel, or presentation proposals by September 8, 2024. Please email your proposal to [email protected] , with the subject line “Spring 2025 Symposium.”

The Editors of the Catholic University Law Review , Vol. 74 The Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law 

Cases Cited  

Space Expl. Techs. Corp. v. NLRB , No. W-24-CV-00203-ADA, 2024 WL 3512082 (W.D. Tex. July 23, 2024)

Delaware State Sportsmen’s Ass’n, Inc. v. Delaware Dep’t of Safety & Homeland Sec. , No. 23-1633, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 17214, ___ F.4th ___ (3d Cir. July 15, 2024)

Moody v. NetChoice LLC , 603 U.S. ___, 144 S. Ct. 2383 (2024)

FDA v. All. for Hippocratic Medicine , 602 U.S. 367 (2024)

Off. of United States Tr. v. John Q. Hammons Fall 2006, LLC , 602 U.S. ___, 144 S. Ct. 1588 (2024)

Barclift v. Keystone Credit Servs., LLC , 93 F.4th 136 (3d Cir. 2024)

United States v. Texas , 599 U.S. 670 (2023)

United States v. Hansen , 599 U.S. 762 (2023)

Hunstein v. Preferred Collection & Mgmt. Servs., Inc. 48 F.4th 1236 (11th Cir. 2022)

Pierre v. Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc. , 29 F.4th 934 (7th Cir. 2022)

TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez , 594 U.S. 413 (2021)

United States v. Arthrex, Inc. , 594 U.S. 1 (2021)

Franklin v. Navient , 534 F.Supp.3d 341 (D. Del. 2021)

Barr v. Am. Ass’n of Pol. Consultants , 140 S.Ct. 2335 (2020)

Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau , 591 U.S. 197 (2020)

June Medical Services LLC v. Russo , 591 U.S. 299 (2020)

• Share on Facebook
• Share on Twitter
• Share on LinkedIn