global regents essay

Social Studies

Office of State Assessment

• Foreign Languages
• Mathematics
• Social Studies
• Elementary and Intermediate

Archive: Regents Examination in Global History and Geography, 2000-09

• Archive: Global Studies
• Translated Editions

University of the State of New York - New York State Education Department

2024 First Year Writing Student Showcase

The First-Year Writing Annual Student Showcase honors and celebrates the powerful work of First-Year Writing students. Each year, in their First-Year Writing course, nearly 5,000 students workshop and develop projects across a range of forms and perspectives: from the deeply personal to the broadly public, from local to global and transnational, from traditional essays to mixed media projects. To curate the showcase, we invite our faculty and graduate instructors to nominate work that they believe exemplifies the goals and values of First-Year Writing, which include equity and accessibility, rhetorical awareness, and multimodality. From those nominations, the selection committee selects the most outstanding projects.

At our second annual showcase on April 19th, 11 students shared their projects with an audience of family, friends, and First-Year Writing faculty, instructors, and guests. The students reflected on their experience in their FYW course as they developed their topic, made rhetorical choices, and engaged in the writing process. Showcase selectee Jae Taylor showed a clip from her narrated video and explained, “I hope my project (a narrated video titled “Painting and Accommodations”) reaches young college students like me so they don’t feel ostracized by the education system. It also gives an insight to those who may not have the same experiences as us, but have the capabilities for empathy.” Another showcase selectee, Gursimrat Dahry, described her work this way: “The process that has allowed me to create this project (inquiry video presentation titled “Carceral Feminism: A Criminal Justice Response to a Crisis of Violence”) has involved evaluating a women’s rights movement through a lens that is objective and simultaneously empathetic.”

The event provided students a stage to share pieces of their products and processes with attendees, in addition to inviting more focused conversations between students and attendees in a gallery walk with the selected projects and student presenters. Attendees had the chance to engage further with the projects and ask students about their rhetorical choices, writing processes, and takeaways. 

We look forward each year to this event and the opportunity it provides to celebrate the voices and work of First-Year Writing students. This year’s showcase and format embodied the FYW program’s commitment to building inclusive, dynamic writing communities where students are visible and valued.

This year’s selected projects are viewable on the  FYW Student Showcase webpage.

Related News

2023-24 TCAB Mentor Program Closing Event

The Technical Writing and Communication Advisory Board (TCAB) concluded the 2023-2024 Mentor Program on March 25th hosting a mentor closing event for all participants.

Undergraduate Student Award Winners

Department of Writing Studies - 2023-24 Undergraduate Writing Award Winners

RHM Symposium at the University of Minnesota

Scholars in the Rhetoric of Health and Medicine (RHM) met in October to share ways how language and other communication forms shape our health

More Writing Studies News

Most Asian Americans think SAT but not race is fair to consider for college admissions

• Show more sharing options
• Copy Link URL Copied!

Most Asian American adults support use of the SAT and other standardized testing, along with high school grades, in college admission decisions but reject considering race or ethnicity to determine access, according to a new national survey released Wednesday.

The majority also think it’s unfair for colleges to consider an applicant’s athletic ability, family alumni ties, ability to pay full tuition or parents’ educational levels in determining who should get acceptance letters, the survey found.

At the same time, most Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders surveyed believe that slavery, racism and segregation should be taught in schools and oppose individual school boards restricting classroom discussion of specific topics, as some conservative districts have done.

Overall, AAPI adults value higher education not only as a pathway to economic well-being but for teaching critical thinking, fostering the free exchange of ideas and advancing equity and inclusion.

The survey by AAPI Data, a UC research enterprise, and the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research interviewed a nationally representative sample of 1,068 AAPI adults age 18 and older. The poll, conducted April 8-17 in English, Mandarin, Cantonese, Vietnamese and Korean, has a margin of error of 4.7 percentage points.

The poll offers a comprehensive look at attitudes toward education among Asian Americans, who make up a disproportionately large share of students at the University of California and other selective institutions — yet are often overlooked in policy discussions about equity and diversity.

Supreme Court strikes down race-based affirmative action in college admissions

In another major reversal, the Supreme Court forbids the use of race as an admissions factor at colleges and universities.

June 29, 2023

Several polls have shown that Asian Americans support affirmative action, depending on how the question is asked. A 2022 survey found support at 69% when respondents were asked if they favor programs to help Black people, women and other minorities get access to higher education. But Asian American plaintiffs who led a landmark lawsuit against Harvard University argued that affirmative action policies that use race as a factor in admissions discriminated against them. Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down such race-conscious practices.

In the new survey, the question about using race in admissions, worded without context about whom it would help, drew little support. Asked if they think it is “fair, unfair or neither fair or unfair for colleges and universities to make decisions about admitting students” based on race and ethnicity, 18% of respondents said it was fair, 53% said it was unfair, and 27% said it was neither.

The AAPI Data/Associated Press-NORC survey is among the first to gauge Asian American attitudes on standardized testing and other metrics for college admissions, along with broader questions about the value of education.

“The stereotype of AAPIs might suggest that they care about education only in a narrow way as it relates to economic mobility and hard skills related to job prospects,” said Karthick Ramakrishnan, a UC Riverside professor of public policy and political science and founder of AAPI Data. “This study reveals a more nuanced and fuller portrait, illustrating that AAPI individuals value education ... also for fostering critical thinking and nurturing a more informed citizenry.”

A strong majority — 71% — of those surveyed believe the history of slavery, racism, segregation and the AAPI community should be taught in public schools. A smaller majority, 53%, favor teaching about sex and sexuality — including 72% of AAPI Democrats and 25% of Republicans.

Overall, AAPI adults hold similar views as the general American public about the keys to children’s success: hard work, time spent with parents and which schools they attend. Asian Americans, however, are significantly more likely to believe the neighborhoods they live in are important to educational success — 62%, compared with 49% of all Americans. Ramakrishnan said research has shown that AAPI families are more willing to move to areas with good schools even if it means living in worse housing.

Asian American support for standardized testing comes as several elite universities have restored those requirements for admissions after pausing them during the pandemic. In recent months, Harvard, Caltech, Yale, Dartmouth and the University of Texas at Austin, among others, have reinstated testing mandates.

UC slams the door on standardized admissions tests, nixing any SAT alternative

The University of California has slammed the door shut on standardized testing for admissions, saying no alternative to the SAT can avoid bias based on race, income.

Nov. 18, 2021

Some institutions say their reviews showed that the testing requirements increase diversity — benefiting applicants with less access to a rigorous high school curriculum, strong letters of recommendation or impressive extracurricular activities. Others have said it’s harder to assess an applicant’s readiness for college work without standardized testing — especially because many educators have reported significant grade inflation since the pandemic.

The University of California and California State University have both eliminated standardized testing requirements for admission.

Although some UC leaders have indicated interest in reviewing the effect of that decision on student outcomes, faculty leaders say there may not be much of an appetite for it. The UC Board of Regents rejected the Academic Senate’s recommendation to retain testing requirements and voted to bar them for admissions decisions.

USC is continuing its test-optional policy — accepting scores from those who wish to submit them but not penalizing those who don’t — and is reviewing whether to continue that course.

Frank Xu, a San Diego parent of a high school sophomore and an MIT student, said he opposed UC regents’ decision to nix testing mandates and believes that the preponderance of research shows that test scores highly correlate with college success.

“I’m all for research-based decisions, and I felt that at UC, it was a completely political decision to ignore the faculty senate,” he said.

But some Asian American students say testing is an unfair factor in admissions decisions.

At Downtown Magnets High School, students Rida Hossain and Shariqa Sultana said their families were not able to afford test prep, with annual incomes of less than $30,000 and relatives in Bangladesh to support.

“Standardized testing doesn’t portray a student’s capacity for how they’ll perform in higher education, because in the classroom, they’ll be doing a lot of essay writing, research, collaboration and projects that wouldn’t necessarily be put into a multiple-choice exam,” Shariqa said. “How you actually perform in class and your extracurriculars are a better metric than one test that determines your entire future.”

Ramakrishnan said there are several reasons why many Asian Americans support standardized testing. The majority are immigrants from China, South Korea, India and other countries that use such tests for college admissions, he said. They are accustomed to a system of high-stakes testing and see it as an equitable way to determine college access, compared with wealth or political connections.

The survey backs up that point, showing that 70% of AAPI respondents who are immigrants back testing, compared with 56% of those born in the United States. A plurality of those surveyed, 45%, said it was fair to consider personal experiences with hardship or adversity.

But 69% of those surveyed said legacy admissions — preferential treatment for children of alumni — was unfair, while 48% oppose consideration of an applicant’s ability to pay. A majority, 54%, don’t think it’s fair to consider whether applicants are the first in their family to attend college.

More to Read

Nearly 8 in 10 AAPI adults in U.S. think abortion should be legal, poll finds

March 21, 2024

Letters to the Editor: If the inequitable SAT is back, bring test prep to all high schools

UC applications rise for fall 2024, with gains in diversity and transfer applicants

March 6, 2024

Letters to the Editor

Opinion: So Dartmouth will require the SAT again. Here’s what really matters for Californians seeking degrees

Feb. 13, 2024

UCLA doubles down on ethnic studies expansion amid fraught national politics

Feb. 5, 2024

Editorial: Early decision admissions for college unfairly favor wealthy students

Jan. 4, 2024

Letters to the Editor: Your smart kid wasn’t the only perfect student rejected by Stanford or Berkeley

Dec. 4, 2023

Post-affirmative action, Asian American families are more stressed than ever about college admissions

Nov. 26, 2023

World & Nation

1 in 3 U.S. Asians and Pacific Islanders have faced racial abuse this year, poll shows

Nov. 14, 2023

Start your day right

Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.

You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.

Teresa Watanabe covers education for the Los Angeles Times. Since joining the Times in 1989, she has covered immigration, ethnic communities, religion, Pacific Rim business and served as Tokyo correspondent and bureau chief. She also covered Asia, national affairs and state government for the San Jose Mercury News and wrote editorials for the Los Angeles Herald Examiner. A Seattle native, she graduated from USC in journalism and in East Asian languages and culture.

More From the Los Angeles Times

Big expansion of UC strike over pro-Palestinian protests: Irvine, San Diego, Santa Barbara next

May 31, 2024

Opinion: I live in Northern California. Why do I have to travel hundreds of miles to take the SAT?

How pro-Palestinian protests led to a massive UC strike, injecting new fuel into antiwar activism

Proposal to limit transgender youth rights fails to qualify for California’s November ballot

May 28, 2024

• New Visions Social Studies Curriculum
• Curriculum Development Team
• Content Contributors
• Getting Started: Baseline Assessments

Getting Started: Resources to Enhance Instruction

• Getting Started: Instructional Routines
• Unit 9.1: Global 1 Introduction
• Unit 9.2: The First Civilizations
• Unit 9.3: Classical Civilizations
• Unit 9.4: Political Powers and Achievements
• Unit 9.5: Social and Cultural Growth and Conflict
• Unit 9.6: Ottoman and Ming Pre-1600
• Unit 9.7: Transformation of Western Europe and Russia
• Unit 9.8: Africa and the Americas Pre-1600
• Unit 9.9: Interactions and Disruptions
• Unit 10.0: Global 2 Introduction
• Unit 10.1: The World in 1750 C.E.
• Unit 10.2: Enlightenment, Revolution, and Nationalism
• Unit 10.3: Industrial Revolution
• Unit 10.4: Imperialism
• Unit 10.5: World Wars
• Unit 10.6: Cold War Era
• Unit 10.7: Decolonization and Nationalism
• Unit 10.8: Cultural Traditions and Modernization
• Unit 10.9: Globalization and the Changing Environment
• Unit 10.10: Human Rights Violations
• Unit 11.0: US History Introduction
• Unit 11.1: Colonial Foundations
• Unit 11.2: American Revolution
• Unit 11.3A: Building a Nation
• Unit 11.03B: Sectionalism & the Civil War
• Unit 11.4: Reconstruction
• Unit 11.5: Gilded Age and Progressive Era
• Unit 11.6: Rise of American Power
• Unit 11.7: Prosperity and Depression
• Unit 11.8: World War II
• Unit 11.9: Cold War
• Unit 11.10: Domestic Change
• Resources: Regents Prep: Global 2 Exam
• Regents Prep: Framework USH Exam: Regents Prep: US Exam
• Find Resources

Regents Prep: Global 2 Exam

Enduring Issues List and How to Identify an Enduring Issue

Poster-ready guide for identifying and enduring issue and a list of common enduring issues, but don’t just stick to the list.

Getting Started

Classroom Environment Materials : New Visions Enduring Issues Tips and List

Defines "enduring issue" with a provides a list of tips for identifying one. Includes the list of New Visions Enduring Issues that commonly come up in the curriculum.

Teacher Feedback

Please comment below with questions, feedback, suggestions, or descriptions of your experience using this resource with students.

If you found an error in the resource, please let us know so we can correct it by filling out this form .