- Privacy Policy
![narrative analysis research paper Research Method](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/logo.png)
Home » Narrative Analysis – Types, Methods and Examples
![](http://rss3.fun/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
Narrative Analysis – Types, Methods and Examples
Table of Contents
![narrative analysis research paper Narrative Analysis](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Narrative_Analysis-1024x576.jpg)
Narrative Analysis
Definition:
Narrative analysis is a qualitative research methodology that involves examining and interpreting the stories or narratives people tell in order to gain insights into the meanings, experiences, and perspectives that underlie them. Narrative analysis can be applied to various forms of communication, including written texts, oral interviews, and visual media.
In narrative analysis, researchers typically examine the structure, content, and context of the narratives they are studying, paying close attention to the language, themes, and symbols used by the storytellers. They may also look for patterns or recurring motifs within the narratives, and consider the cultural and social contexts in which they are situated.
Types of Narrative Analysis
Types of Narrative Analysis are as follows:
Content Analysis
This type of narrative analysis involves examining the content of a narrative in order to identify themes, motifs, and other patterns. Researchers may use coding schemes to identify specific themes or categories within the text, and then analyze how they are related to each other and to the overall narrative. Content analysis can be used to study various forms of communication, including written texts, oral interviews, and visual media.
Structural Analysis
This type of narrative analysis focuses on the formal structure of a narrative, including its plot, character development, and use of literary devices. Researchers may analyze the narrative arc, the relationship between the protagonist and antagonist, or the use of symbolism and metaphor. Structural analysis can be useful for understanding how a narrative is constructed and how it affects the reader or audience.
Discourse Analysis
This type of narrative analysis focuses on the language and discourse used in a narrative, including the social and cultural context in which it is situated. Researchers may analyze the use of specific words or phrases, the tone and style of the narrative, or the ways in which social and cultural norms are reflected in the narrative. Discourse analysis can be useful for understanding how narratives are influenced by larger social and cultural structures.
Phenomenological Analysis
This type of narrative analysis focuses on the subjective experience of the narrator, and how they interpret and make sense of their experiences. Researchers may analyze the language used to describe experiences, the emotions expressed in the narrative, or the ways in which the narrator constructs meaning from their experiences. Phenomenological analysis can be useful for understanding how people make sense of their own lives and experiences.
Critical Analysis
This type of narrative analysis involves examining the political, social, and ideological implications of a narrative, and questioning its underlying assumptions and values. Researchers may analyze the ways in which a narrative reflects or reinforces dominant power structures, or how it challenges or subverts those structures. Critical analysis can be useful for understanding the role that narratives play in shaping social and cultural norms.
Autoethnography
This type of narrative analysis involves using personal narratives to explore cultural experiences and identity formation. Researchers may use their own personal narratives to explore issues such as race, gender, or sexuality, and to understand how larger social and cultural structures shape individual experiences. Autoethnography can be useful for understanding how individuals negotiate and navigate complex cultural identities.
Thematic Analysis
This method involves identifying themes or patterns that emerge from the data, and then interpreting these themes in relation to the research question. Researchers may use a deductive approach, where they start with a pre-existing theoretical framework, or an inductive approach, where themes are generated from the data itself.
Narrative Analysis Conducting Guide
Here are some steps for conducting narrative analysis:
- Identify the research question: Narrative analysis begins with identifying the research question or topic of interest. Researchers may want to explore a particular social or cultural phenomenon, or gain a deeper understanding of a particular individual’s experience.
- Collect the narratives: Researchers then collect the narratives or stories that they will analyze. This can involve collecting written texts, conducting interviews, or analyzing visual media.
- Transcribe and code the narratives: Once the narratives have been collected, they are transcribed into a written format, and then coded in order to identify themes, motifs, or other patterns. Researchers may use a coding scheme that has been developed specifically for the study, or they may use an existing coding scheme.
- Analyze the narratives: Researchers then analyze the narratives, focusing on the themes, motifs, and other patterns that have emerged from the coding process. They may also analyze the formal structure of the narratives, the language used, and the social and cultural context in which they are situated.
- Interpret the findings: Finally, researchers interpret the findings of the narrative analysis, and draw conclusions about the meanings, experiences, and perspectives that underlie the narratives. They may use the findings to develop theories, make recommendations, or inform further research.
Applications of Narrative Analysis
Narrative analysis is a versatile qualitative research method that has applications across a wide range of fields, including psychology, sociology, anthropology, literature, and history. Here are some examples of how narrative analysis can be used:
- Understanding individuals’ experiences: Narrative analysis can be used to gain a deeper understanding of individuals’ experiences, including their thoughts, feelings, and perspectives. For example, psychologists might use narrative analysis to explore the stories that individuals tell about their experiences with mental illness.
- Exploring cultural and social phenomena: Narrative analysis can also be used to explore cultural and social phenomena, such as gender, race, and identity. Sociologists might use narrative analysis to examine how individuals understand and experience their gender identity.
- Analyzing historical events: Narrative analysis can be used to analyze historical events, including those that have been recorded in literary texts or personal accounts. Historians might use narrative analysis to explore the stories of survivors of historical traumas, such as war or genocide.
- Examining media representations: Narrative analysis can be used to examine media representations of social and cultural phenomena, such as news stories, films, or television shows. Communication scholars might use narrative analysis to examine how news media represent different social groups.
- Developing interventions: Narrative analysis can be used to develop interventions to address social and cultural problems. For example, social workers might use narrative analysis to understand the experiences of individuals who have experienced domestic violence, and then use that knowledge to develop more effective interventions.
Examples of Narrative Analysis
Here are some examples of how narrative analysis has been used in research:
- Personal narratives of illness: Researchers have used narrative analysis to examine the personal narratives of individuals living with chronic illness, to understand how they make sense of their experiences and construct their identities.
- Oral histories: Historians have used narrative analysis to analyze oral histories to gain insights into individuals’ experiences of historical events and social movements.
- Children’s stories: Researchers have used narrative analysis to analyze children’s stories to understand how they understand and make sense of the world around them.
- Personal diaries : Researchers have used narrative analysis to examine personal diaries to gain insights into individuals’ experiences of significant life events, such as the loss of a loved one or the transition to adulthood.
- Memoirs : Researchers have used narrative analysis to analyze memoirs to understand how individuals construct their life stories and make sense of their experiences.
- Life histories : Researchers have used narrative analysis to examine life histories to gain insights into individuals’ experiences of migration, displacement, or social exclusion.
Purpose of Narrative Analysis
The purpose of narrative analysis is to gain a deeper understanding of the stories that individuals tell about their experiences, identities, and beliefs. By analyzing the structure, content, and context of these stories, researchers can uncover patterns and themes that shed light on the ways in which individuals make sense of their lives and the world around them.
The primary purpose of narrative analysis is to explore the meanings that individuals attach to their experiences. This involves examining the different elements of a story, such as the plot, characters, setting, and themes, to identify the underlying values, beliefs, and attitudes that shape the story. By analyzing these elements, researchers can gain insights into the ways in which individuals construct their identities, understand their relationships with others, and make sense of the world.
Narrative analysis can also be used to identify patterns and themes across multiple stories. This involves comparing and contrasting the stories of different individuals or groups to identify commonalities and differences. By analyzing these patterns and themes, researchers can gain insights into broader cultural and social phenomena, such as gender, race, and identity.
In addition, narrative analysis can be used to develop interventions that address social and cultural problems. By understanding the stories that individuals tell about their experiences, researchers can develop interventions that are tailored to the unique needs of different individuals and groups.
Overall, the purpose of narrative analysis is to provide a rich, nuanced understanding of the ways in which individuals construct meaning and make sense of their lives. By analyzing the stories that individuals tell, researchers can gain insights into the complex and multifaceted nature of human experience.
When to use Narrative Analysis
Here are some situations where narrative analysis may be appropriate:
- Studying life stories: Narrative analysis can be useful in understanding how individuals construct their life stories, including the events, characters, and themes that are important to them.
- Analyzing cultural narratives: Narrative analysis can be used to analyze cultural narratives, such as myths, legends, and folktales, to understand their meanings and functions.
- Exploring organizational narratives: Narrative analysis can be helpful in examining the stories that organizations tell about themselves, their histories, and their values, to understand how they shape the culture and practices of the organization.
- Investigating media narratives: Narrative analysis can be used to analyze media narratives, such as news stories, films, and TV shows, to understand how they construct meaning and influence public perceptions.
- Examining policy narratives: Narrative analysis can be helpful in examining policy narratives, such as political speeches and policy documents, to understand how they construct ideas and justify policy decisions.
Characteristics of Narrative Analysis
Here are some key characteristics of narrative analysis:
- Focus on stories and narratives: Narrative analysis is concerned with analyzing the stories and narratives that people tell, whether they are oral or written, to understand how they shape and reflect individuals’ experiences and identities.
- Emphasis on context: Narrative analysis seeks to understand the context in which the narratives are produced and the social and cultural factors that shape them.
- Interpretive approach: Narrative analysis is an interpretive approach that seeks to identify patterns and themes in the stories and narratives and to understand the meaning that individuals and communities attach to them.
- Iterative process: Narrative analysis involves an iterative process of analysis, in which the researcher continually refines their understanding of the narratives as they examine more data.
- Attention to language and form : Narrative analysis pays close attention to the language and form of the narratives, including the use of metaphor, imagery, and narrative structure, to understand the meaning that individuals and communities attach to them.
- Reflexivity : Narrative analysis requires the researcher to reflect on their own assumptions and biases and to consider how their own positionality may shape their interpretation of the narratives.
- Qualitative approach: Narrative analysis is typically a qualitative research method that involves in-depth analysis of a small number of cases rather than large-scale quantitative studies.
Advantages of Narrative Analysis
Here are some advantages of narrative analysis:
- Rich and detailed data : Narrative analysis provides rich and detailed data that allows for a deep understanding of individuals’ experiences, emotions, and identities.
- Humanizing approach: Narrative analysis allows individuals to tell their own stories and express their own perspectives, which can help to humanize research and give voice to marginalized communities.
- Holistic understanding: Narrative analysis allows researchers to understand individuals’ experiences in their entirety, including the social, cultural, and historical contexts in which they occur.
- Flexibility : Narrative analysis is a flexible research method that can be applied to a wide range of contexts and research questions.
- Interpretive insights: Narrative analysis provides interpretive insights into the meanings that individuals attach to their experiences and the ways in which they construct their identities.
- Appropriate for sensitive topics: Narrative analysis can be particularly useful in researching sensitive topics, such as trauma or mental health, as it allows individuals to express their experiences in their own words and on their own terms.
- Can lead to policy implications: Narrative analysis can provide insights that can inform policy decisions and interventions, particularly in areas such as health, education, and social policy.
Limitations of Narrative Analysis
Here are some of the limitations of narrative analysis:
- Subjectivity : Narrative analysis relies on the interpretation of researchers, which can be influenced by their own biases and assumptions.
- Limited generalizability: Narrative analysis typically involves in-depth analysis of a small number of cases, which limits its generalizability to broader populations.
- Ethical considerations: The process of eliciting and analyzing narratives can raise ethical concerns, particularly when sensitive topics such as trauma or abuse are involved.
- Limited control over data collection: Narrative analysis often relies on data that is already available, such as interviews, oral histories, or written texts, which can limit the control that researchers have over the quality and completeness of the data.
- Time-consuming: Narrative analysis can be a time-consuming research method, particularly when analyzing large amounts of data.
- Interpretation challenges: Narrative analysis requires researchers to make complex interpretations of data, which can be challenging and time-consuming.
- Limited statistical analysis: Narrative analysis is typically a qualitative research method that does not lend itself well to statistical analysis.
About the author
Muhammad Hassan
Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer
You may also like
![narrative analysis research paper Discriminant Analysis](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Discriminant_Analysis-145x100.png)
Discriminant Analysis – Methods, Types and...
![narrative analysis research paper Inferential Statistics](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Inferential_Statistics-145x100.png)
Inferential Statistics – Types, Methods and...
![narrative analysis research paper Symmetric Histogram](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Symmetric_Histogram-145x100.png)
Symmetric Histogram – Examples and Making Guide
![narrative analysis research paper Methodological Framework](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Methodological_Framework-145x100.png)
Methodological Framework – Types, Examples and...
![narrative analysis research paper Descriptive Statistics](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Descriptive_Statistics-145x100.png)
Descriptive Statistics – Types, Methods and...
![narrative analysis research paper Graphical Methods](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Graphical_Methods-145x100.png)
Graphical Methods – Types, Examples and Guide
![narrative analysis research paper](https://gradcoach.com/wp-content/uploads/GC-Logo-Registered.png)
Narrative Analysis 101
Everything you need to know to get started
By: Ethar Al-Saraf (PhD)| Expert Reviewed By: Eunice Rautenbach (DTech) | March 2023
If you’re new to research, the host of qualitative analysis methods available to you can be a little overwhelming. In this post, we’ll unpack the sometimes slippery topic of narrative analysis . We’ll explain what it is, consider its strengths and weaknesses , and look at when and when not to use this analysis method.
Overview: Narrative Analysis
- What is narrative analysis (simple definition)
- The two overarching approaches
- The strengths & weaknesses of narrative analysis
- When (and when not) to use it
- Key takeaways
What Is Narrative Analysis?
Simply put, narrative analysis is a qualitative analysis method focused on interpreting human experiences and motivations by looking closely at the stories (the narratives) people tell in a particular context.
In other words, a narrative analysis interprets long-form participant responses or written stories as data, to uncover themes and meanings . That data could be taken from interviews, monologues, written stories, or even recordings. In other words, narrative analysis can be used on both primary and secondary data to provide evidence from the experiences described.
That’s all quite conceptual, so let’s look at an example of how narrative analysis could be used.
Let’s say you’re interested in researching the beliefs of a particular author on popular culture. In that case, you might identify the characters , plotlines , symbols and motifs used in their stories. You could then use narrative analysis to analyse these in combination and against the backdrop of the relevant context.
This would allow you to interpret the underlying meanings and implications in their writing, and what they reveal about the beliefs of the author. In other words, you’d look to understand the views of the author by analysing the narratives that run through their work.
![narrative-analysis-definition Simple definition of narrative analysis](https://gradcoach.com/wp-content/uploads/narrative-analysis-definition-1.png)
The Two Overarching Approaches
Generally speaking, there are two approaches that one can take to narrative analysis. Specifically, an inductive approach or a deductive approach. Each one will have a meaningful impact on how you interpret your data and the conclusions you can draw, so it’s important that you understand the difference.
First up is the inductive approach to narrative analysis.
The inductive approach takes a bottom-up view , allowing the data to speak for itself, without the influence of any preconceived notions . With this approach, you begin by looking at the data and deriving patterns and themes that can be used to explain the story, as opposed to viewing the data through the lens of pre-existing hypotheses, theories or frameworks. In other words, the analysis is led by the data.
For example, with an inductive approach, you might notice patterns or themes in the way an author presents their characters or develops their plot. You’d then observe these patterns, develop an interpretation of what they might reveal in the context of the story, and draw conclusions relative to the aims of your research.
Contrasted to this is the deductive approach.
With the deductive approach to narrative analysis, you begin by using existing theories that a narrative can be tested against . Here, the analysis adopts particular theoretical assumptions and/or provides hypotheses, and then looks for evidence in a story that will either verify or disprove them.
For example, your analysis might begin with a theory that wealthy authors only tell stories to get the sympathy of their readers. A deductive analysis might then look at the narratives of wealthy authors for evidence that will substantiate (or refute) the theory and then draw conclusions about its accuracy, and suggest explanations for why that might or might not be the case.
Which approach you should take depends on your research aims, objectives and research questions . If these are more exploratory in nature, you’ll likely take an inductive approach. Conversely, if they are more confirmatory in nature, you’ll likely opt for the deductive approach.
Need a helping hand?
Strengths & Weaknesses
Now that we have a clearer view of what narrative analysis is and the two approaches to it, it’s important to understand its strengths and weaknesses , so that you can make the right choices in your research project.
A primary strength of narrative analysis is the rich insight it can generate by uncovering the underlying meanings and interpretations of human experience. The focus on an individual narrative highlights the nuances and complexities of their experience, revealing details that might be missed or considered insignificant by other methods.
Another strength of narrative analysis is the range of topics it can be used for. The focus on human experience means that a narrative analysis can democratise your data analysis, by revealing the value of individuals’ own interpretation of their experience in contrast to broader social, cultural, and political factors.
All that said, just like all analysis methods, narrative analysis has its weaknesses. It’s important to understand these so that you can choose the most appropriate method for your particular research project.
The first drawback of narrative analysis is the problem of subjectivity and interpretation . In other words, a drawback of the focus on stories and their details is that they’re open to being understood differently depending on who’s reading them. This means that a strong understanding of the author’s cultural context is crucial to developing your interpretation of the data. At the same time, it’s important that you remain open-minded in how you interpret your chosen narrative and avoid making any assumptions .
A second weakness of narrative analysis is the issue of reliability and generalisation . Since narrative analysis depends almost entirely on a subjective narrative and your interpretation, the findings and conclusions can’t usually be generalised or empirically verified. Although some conclusions can be drawn about the cultural context, they’re still based on what will almost always be anecdotal data and not suitable for the basis of a theory, for example.
Last but not least, the focus on long-form data expressed as stories means that narrative analysis can be very time-consuming . In addition to the source data itself, you will have to be well informed on the author’s cultural context as well as other interpretations of the narrative, where possible, to ensure you have a holistic view. So, if you’re going to undertake narrative analysis, make sure that you allocate a generous amount of time to work through the data.
![research-methodology-webinar-2024 Free Webinar: Research Methodology 101](https://gradcoach.com/wp-content/uploads/research-methodology-webinar-2024.png)
When To Use Narrative Analysis
As a qualitative method focused on analysing and interpreting narratives describing human experiences, narrative analysis is usually most appropriate for research topics focused on social, personal, cultural , or even ideological events or phenomena and how they’re understood at an individual level.
For example, if you were interested in understanding the experiences and beliefs of individuals suffering social marginalisation, you could use narrative analysis to look at the narratives and stories told by people in marginalised groups to identify patterns , symbols , or motifs that shed light on how they rationalise their experiences.
In this example, narrative analysis presents a good natural fit as it’s focused on analysing people’s stories to understand their views and beliefs at an individual level. Conversely, if your research was geared towards understanding broader themes and patterns regarding an event or phenomena, analysis methods such as content analysis or thematic analysis may be better suited, depending on your research aim .
![narrative-analysis-suitability narrative analysis research paper](https://gradcoach.com/wp-content/uploads/narrative-analysis-suitability.png)
Let’s recap
In this post, we’ve explored the basics of narrative analysis in qualitative research. The key takeaways are:
- Narrative analysis is a qualitative analysis method focused on interpreting human experience in the form of stories or narratives .
- There are two overarching approaches to narrative analysis: the inductive (exploratory) approach and the deductive (confirmatory) approach.
- Like all analysis methods, narrative analysis has a particular set of strengths and weaknesses .
- Narrative analysis is generally most appropriate for research focused on interpreting individual, human experiences as expressed in detailed , long-form accounts.
If you’d like to learn more about narrative analysis and qualitative analysis methods in general, be sure to check out the rest of the Grad Coach blog here . Alternatively, if you’re looking for hands-on help with your project, take a look at our 1-on-1 private coaching service .
![title= narrative analysis research paper](https://gradcoach.com/wp-content/uploads/course.png)
Psst... there’s more!
This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...
Thanks. I need examples of narrative analysis
Here are some examples of research topics that could utilise narrative analysis:
Personal Narratives of Trauma: Analysing personal stories of individuals who have experienced trauma to understand the impact, coping mechanisms, and healing processes.
Identity Formation in Immigrant Communities: Examining the narratives of immigrants to explore how they construct and negotiate their identities in a new cultural context.
Media Representations of Gender: Analysing narratives in media texts (such as films, television shows, or advertisements) to investigate the portrayal of gender roles, stereotypes, and power dynamics.
Where can I find an example of a narrative analysis table ?
Please i need help with my project,
how can I cite this article in APA 7th style?
please mention the sources as well.
My research is mixed approach. I use interview,key_inforamt interview,FGD and document.so,which qualitative analysis is appropriate to analyze these data.Thanks
Which qualitative analysis methode is appropriate to analyze data obtain from intetview,key informant intetview,Focus group discussion and document.
I’ve finished my PhD. Now I need a “platform” that will help me objectively ascertain the tacit assumptions that are buried within a narrative. Can you help?
Submit a Comment Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
- Print Friendly
Using narrative analysis in qualitative research
Last updated
7 March 2023
Reviewed by
Jean Kaluza
Short on time? Get an AI generated summary of this article instead
After spending considerable time and effort interviewing persons for research, you want to ensure you get the most out of the data you gathered. One method that gives you an excellent opportunity to connect with your data on a very human and personal level is a narrative analysis in qualitative research.
Master narrative analysis
Analyze your qualitative data faster and surface more actionable insights
- What is narrative analysis?
Narrative analysis is a type of qualitative data analysis that focuses on interpreting the core narratives from a study group's personal stories. Using first-person narrative, data is acquired and organized to allow the researcher to understand how the individuals experienced something.
Instead of focusing on just the actual words used during an interview, the narrative analysis also allows for a compilation of data on how the person expressed themselves, what language they used when describing a particular event or feeling, and the thoughts and motivations they experienced. A narrative analysis will also consider how the research participants constructed their narratives.
From the interview to coding , you should strive to keep the entire individual narrative together, so that the information shared during the interview remains intact.
Is narrative analysis qualitative or quantitative?
Narrative analysis is a qualitative research method.
Is narrative analysis a method or methodology?
A method describes the tools or processes used to understand your data; methodology describes the overall framework used to support the methods chosen. By this definition, narrative analysis can be both a method used to understand data and a methodology appropriate for approaching data that comes primarily from first-person stories.
- Do you need to perform narrative research to conduct a narrative analysis?
A narrative analysis will give the best answers about the data if you begin with conducting narrative research. Narrative research explores an entire story with a research participant to understand their personal story.
What are the characteristics of narrative research?
Narrative research always includes data from individuals that tell the story of their experiences. This is captured using loosely structured interviews . These can be a single interview or a series of long interviews over a period of time. Narrative research focuses on the construct and expressions of the story as experienced by the research participant.
- Examples of types of narratives
Narrative data is based on narratives. Your data may include the entire life story or a complete personal narrative, giving a comprehensive account of someone's life, depending on the researched subject. Alternatively, a topical story can provide context around one specific moment in the research participant's life.
Personal narratives can be single or multiple sessions, encompassing more than topical stories but not entire life stories of the individuals.
- What is the objective of narrative analysis?
The narrative analysis seeks to organize the overall experience of a group of research participants' stories. The goal is to turn people's individual narratives into data that can be coded and organized so that researchers can easily understand the impact of a certain event, feeling, or decision on the involved persons. At the end of a narrative analysis, researchers can identify certain core narratives that capture the human experience.
What is the difference between content analysis and narrative analysis?
Content analysis is a research method that determines how often certain words, concepts, or themes appear inside a sampling of qualitative data . The narrative analysis focuses on the overall story and organizing the constructs and features of a narrative.
Free AI content analysis generator
Make sense of your research by automatically summarizing key takeaways through our free content analysis tool.
![narrative analysis research paper narrative analysis research paper](https://images.ctfassets.net/mmu68mmhtb17/76gOBiC91O5cj02edxTX0t/385646b46c425b354a88e2a1e09d9739/AI_content_analysis_thumbnail.png?w=460&h=392&q=80&fm=png)
What is the difference between narrative analysis and case study in qualitative research?
A case study focuses on one particular event. A narrative analysis draws from a larger amount of data surrounding the entire narrative, including the thoughts that led up to a decision and the personal conclusion of the research participant.
A case study, therefore, is any specific topic studied in depth, whereas narrative analysis explores single or multi-faceted experiences across time.
What is the difference between narrative analysis and thematic analysis?
A thematic analysis will appear as researchers review the available qualitative data and note any recurring themes. Unlike narrative analysis, which describes an entire method of evaluating data to find a conclusion, a thematic analysis only describes reviewing and categorizing the data.
- Capturing narrative data
Because narrative data relies heavily on allowing a research participant to describe their experience, it is best to allow for a less structured interview. Allowing the participant to explore tangents or analyze their personal narrative will result in more complete data.
When collecting narrative data, always allow the participant the time and space needed to complete their narrative.
- Methods of transcribing narrative data
A narrative analysis requires that the researchers have access to the entire verbatim narrative of the participant, including not just the word they use but the pauses, the verbal tics, and verbal crutches, such as "um" and "hmm."
As the entire way the story is expressed is part of the data, a verbatim transcription should be created before attempting to code the narrative analysis.
![narrative analysis research paper narrative analysis research paper](https://images.ctfassets.net/mmu68mmhtb17/1Y1EiDM7Krpza4P5I6TzdH/177b96e743984d9f17e35fc71137504d/Video_transcription_hero.png?w=256&h=160&q=80&fm=png)
Video and audio transcription templates
- How to code narrative analysis
Coding narrative analysis has two natural start points, either using a deductive coding system or an inductive coding system. Regardless of your chosen method, it's crucial not to lose valuable data during the organization process.
When coding, expect to see more information in the code snippets.
- Types of narrative analysis
After coding is complete, you should expect your data to look like large blocks of text organized by the parts of the story. You will also see where individual narratives compare and diverge.
Inductive method
Using an inductive narrative method treats the entire narrative as one datum or one set of information. An inductive narrative method will encourage the research participant to organize their own story.
To make sense of how a story begins and ends, you must rely on cues from the participant. These may take the form of entrance and exit talks.
Participants may not always provide clear indicators of where their narratives start and end. However, you can anticipate that their stories will contain elements of a beginning, middle, and end. By analyzing these components through coding, you can identify emerging patterns in the data.
Taking cues from entrance and exit talk
Entrance talk is when the participant begins a particular set of narratives. You may hear expressions such as, "I remember when…," "It first occurred to me when…," or "Here's an example…."
Exit talk allows you to see when the story is wrapping up, and you might expect to hear a phrase like, "…and that's how we decided", "after that, we moved on," or "that's pretty much it."
Deductive method
Regardless of your chosen method, using a deductive method can help preserve the overall storyline while coding. Starting with a deductive method allows for the separation of narrative pieces without compromising the story's integrity.
Hybrid inductive and deductive narrative analysis
Using both methods together gives you a comprehensive understanding of the data. You can start by coding the entire story using the inductive method. Then, you can better analyze and interpret the data by applying deductive codes to individual parts of the story.
- How to analyze data after coding using narrative analysis
A narrative analysis aims to take all relevant interviews and organize them down to a few core narratives. After reviewing the coding, these core narratives may appear through a repeated moment of decision occurring before the climax or a key feeling that affected the participant's outcome.
You may see these core narratives diverge early on, or you may learn that a particular moment after introspection reveals the core narrative for each participant. Either way, researchers can now quickly express and understand the data you acquired.
- A step-by-step approach to narrative analysis and finding core narratives
Narrative analysis may look slightly different to each research group, but we will walk through the process using the Delve method for this article.
Step 1 – Code narrative blocks
Organize your narrative blocks using inductive coding to organize stories by a life event.
Example: Narrative interviews are conducted with homeowners asking them to describe how they bought their first home.
Step 2 – Group and read by live-event
You begin your data analysis by reading through each of the narratives coded with the same life event.
Example: You read through each homeowner's experience of buying their first home and notice that some common themes begin to appear, such as "we were tired of renting," "our family expanded to the point that we needed a larger space," and "we had finally saved enough for a downpayment."
Step 3 – Create a nested story structure
As these common narratives develop throughout the participant's interviews, create and nest code according to your narrative analysis framework. Use your coding to break down the narrative into pieces that can be analyzed together.
Example: During your interviews, you find that the beginning of the narrative usually includes the pressures faced before buying a home that pushes the research participants to consider homeownership. The middle of the narrative often includes challenges that come up during the decision-making process. The end of the narrative usually includes perspectives about the excitement, stress, or consequences of home ownership that has finally taken place.
Step 4 – Delve into the story structure
Once the narratives are organized into their pieces, you begin to notice how participants structure their own stories and where similarities and differences emerge.
Example: You find in your research that many people who choose to buy homes had the desire to buy a home before their circumstances allowed them to. You notice that almost all the stories begin with the feeling of some sort of outside pressure.
Step 5 – Compare across story structure
While breaking down narratives into smaller pieces is necessary for analysis, it's important not to lose sight of the overall story. To keep the big picture in mind, take breaks to step back and reread the entire narrative of a code block. This will help you remember how participants expressed themselves and ensure that the core narrative remains the focus of the analysis.
Example: By carefully examining the similarities across the beginnings of participants' narratives, you find the similarities in pressures. Considering the overall narrative, you notice how these pressures lead to similar decisions despite the challenges faced.
Divergence in feelings towards homeownership can be linked to positive or negative pressures. Individuals who received positive pressure, such as family support or excitement, may view homeownership more favorably. Meanwhile, negative pressures like high rent or peer pressure may cause individuals to have a more negative attitude toward homeownership.
These factors can contribute to the initial divergence in feelings towards homeownership.
![](http://rss3.fun/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
Step 6 – Tell the core narrative
After carefully analyzing the data, you have found how the narratives relate and diverge. You may be able to create a theory about why the narratives diverge and can create one or two core narratives that explain the way the story was experienced.
Example: You can now construct a core narrative on how a person's initial feelings toward buying a house affect their feelings after purchasing and living in their first home.
Narrative analysis in qualitative research is an invaluable tool to understand how people's stories and ability to self-narrate reflect the human experience. Qualitative data analysis can be improved through coding and organizing complete narratives. By doing so, researchers can conclude how humans process and move through decisions and life events.
![narrative analysis research paper narrative analysis research paper](https://images.ctfassets.net/mmu68mmhtb17/7CszC04ZhmBtH7L4YT1VUU/14f6fb929cee0d02e003c00ca5437444/research.png?w=256&h=160&q=80&fm=png)
Learn more about qualitative transcription software
Should you be using a customer insights hub.
Do you want to discover previous research faster?
Do you share your research findings with others?
Do you analyze research data?
Start for free today, add your research, and get to key insights faster
Editor’s picks
Last updated: 18 April 2023
Last updated: 27 February 2023
Last updated: 6 February 2023
Last updated: 6 October 2023
Last updated: 5 February 2023
Last updated: 16 April 2023
Last updated: 9 March 2023
Last updated: 12 December 2023
Last updated: 11 March 2024
Last updated: 4 July 2024
Last updated: 6 March 2024
Last updated: 5 March 2024
Last updated: 13 May 2024
Latest articles
Related topics, .css-je19u9{-webkit-align-items:flex-end;-webkit-box-align:flex-end;-ms-flex-align:flex-end;align-items:flex-end;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-flex-direction:row;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;-webkit-box-flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-flex-wrap:wrap;-ms-flex-wrap:wrap;flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-box-pack:center;-ms-flex-pack:center;-webkit-justify-content:center;justify-content:center;row-gap:0;text-align:center;max-width:671px;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}}@media (max-width: 799px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}} decide what to .css-1kiodld{max-height:56px;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-1kiodld{display:none;}} build next, decide what to build next.
![narrative analysis research paper narrative analysis research paper](https://images.ctfassets.net/mmu68mmhtb17/17ZYa6NHX7Cxs8IQ6qjsrJ/847a33e6669349a48c62f76bee8312ea/1.png?w=84&h=84&q=80&fm=png)
Users report unexpectedly high data usage, especially during streaming sessions.
![narrative analysis research paper narrative analysis research paper](https://images.ctfassets.net/mmu68mmhtb17/2Shmch4SlrH6Jhpy8xX2lJ/a29b5842d6fe850fe34c7df6de5804d3/2.png?w=84&h=84&q=80&fm=png)
Users find it hard to navigate from the home page to relevant playlists in the app.
![narrative analysis research paper narrative analysis research paper](https://images.ctfassets.net/mmu68mmhtb17/NBTArUW1okjZYDrAbCt6D/3bdbfae8f41fcbd5b24eb9997beda473/3.png?w=84&h=84&q=80&fm=png)
It would be great to have a sleep timer feature, especially for bedtime listening.
![narrative analysis research paper narrative analysis research paper](https://images.ctfassets.net/mmu68mmhtb17/5gXUnpstdzPtrzGDMf4YAp/eafd05b570ddf2df2e9fb763800b0499/4.png?w=84&h=84&q=80&fm=png)
I need better filters to find the songs or artists I’m looking for.
Log in or sign up
Get started for free
Narrative Analysis In Qualitative Research
Saul Mcleod, PhD
Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester
Saul Mcleod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.
Learn about our Editorial Process
Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc
Associate Editor for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education
Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.
On This Page:
What Is Narrative Analysis?
Narrative analysis is a qualitative research method used to understand how individuals create stories from their personal experiences.
There is an emphasis on understanding the context in which a narrative is constructed, recognizing the influence of historical, cultural, and social factors on storytelling.
It differs from other qualitative methods like interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) and discourse analysis by specifically examining how individuals use stories to make sense of their experiences and the world around them.
Narrative analysis is not applicable to all research topics; it is best suited when the focus of the analysis is narratives or stories.
Examples of topics that are well-suited to narrative analysis include: various aspects of identity, individual experiences of psychological processes, interpersonal and intimate relationships, and experiences of body, beauty and health
Assumptions of Narrative Analysis
- Stories are interpretations of the world and experiences: Narrative analysis assumes that stories are not accurate representations of reality. People use stories to explain or normalize what has occurred in their lives and make sense of why things are the way they are. People make sense of their lives through the stories they tell.
- Language is an object for close investigation: A structural analysis of a narrative focuses on the way a story is told, treating language as an object for investigation in itself, not just as it refers to content. This kind of analysis attends to the linguistic phenomena of a story and its overall composition.
- Meaning is created through narrative: Narrative inquiry is the study of how stories unfold over time and is useful for understanding how people perceive reality, make sense of their worlds, and perform social actions. Researchers and participants are co-authors of stories because they collaborate to create meaning. Narrative analysts show how the tools (e.g. its structure and style) used to build a story create the meaning of the experience being shared
- Stories do not speak for themselves: Narratives do not speak for themselves, and they require interpretation when used as data in social research. Researchers must interpret a story by deciding what constitutes a story, collecting stories, identifying stories within data, and identifying narrative themes and relationships.
Key Concepts in Narrative Analysis
Narrative analysis is concerned with more than just what is said (the content). It also considers how the story is constructed (the structure) and the context or situation in which the story is told (the performance)
- Defining “Story” and “Narrative” : A story is a structured account of events, while a narrative is a story that has been shaped and given meaning by a storyteller. The process of transforming events into a narrative involves selecting, organizing, and interpreting those events in a way that conveys a particular message or understanding.
- Content: While narrative analysis values how a story is told, the content ( what is said ) remains significant. The themes, events, and characters in a story provide insights into the storyteller’s experiences, beliefs, and values. Therefore, narrative analysis sees content as inseparable from structure and performance. All three work together to create the meaning of a story.
- Narrative Structure: Narrative analysis examines how elements like plot, setting, and characterization are used to construct a story. For example, a researcher might study how the sequence of events, the choice of words, or the use of metaphors shapes the meaning of a story.
- Narrative as Performance: Narratives are not simply neutral accounts of events but are performed and co-constructed through interactions between the storyteller and the audience. This means that understanding a narrative involves paying attention to how it is told, who is telling it, and to whom it is being told. For instance, a researcher might study how a story changes depending on who is telling it, or how the same story is received by different audiences.
Approaches to Narrative Analysis
There are different models and approaches to narrative analysis, and the type that is used depends on the research problem.
- Thematic Analysis : Thematic analysis assumes language is a direct and unambiguous route to meaning. In this approach, researchers collect many stories and then inductively create conceptual groupings from the data. One of the assumptions of thematic analysis is that everyone in the group means the same thing by what they say, even when grouped into a similar thematic category.
- Structural Analysis: This approach views language as a resource and an object for investigation, moving beyond the referential content. Structural analysis assumes the way a story is told is as important as the content of the story. Following Labov’s Narrative Model, the researcher may focus on identifying and examining the key elements of narrative structure, such as the abstract, orientation, complicating action, evaluation, resolution, and coda.
- Interactional Analysis: Interactional analysis looks at how narratives are created and understood within the context of social interactions. This approach acknowledges that narratives are not created in isolation but are shaped by the listener’s responses, the social context of the storytelling, and the relationship between the storyteller and the listener. E.g. Mishler’s Model.
- Performance Analysis : Examining the performative elements of storytelling such as the use of language, nonverbal communication, and audience engagement provides further insights into how stories are constructed and the effects they create. Researchers are interested in how the narrator positions themselves in relation to the audience.
Pratical Steps: Conducting Narrative Analysis
The steps involved in conducting narrative analysis are often iterative and non-linear, rather than following a strict sequential order.
While the steps provide a general framework and guidance for the research process, in practice, researchers may move back and forth between different stages, or engage in multiple steps simultaneously, as new insights and questions emerge from the data.
The iterative nature of narrative analysis reflects the complex and dynamic nature of human experience and meaning-making.
1. Situate the Epistemological Approach
Determine whether to use a naturalist or constructivist approach. The research questions and theoretical framework inform this decision.
Situating the epistemological approach at the outset of the study helps ensure consistency and coherence throughout the research process, guiding methodological choices and the interpretation of findings.
If the research questions focus on understanding the subjective experiences and meaning-making processes of participants, a constructivist approach may be more appropriate.
Conversely, if the research aims to identify common patterns or themes across narratives and assumes a more objective reality, a naturalist approach may be suitable.
Naturalist Approach :
- Assumes that narratives reflect an objective reality or truth
- Seeks to capture and understand the “real” experiences and perspectives of participants
- Aims to minimize the researcher’s influence on the data collection and interpretation process
- Aligns with a more positivist or realist paradigm
Constructivist Approach :
- Assumes that narratives are constructed and shaped by the interaction between the narrator and the listener (researcher)
- Acknowledges that multiple realities or truths can exist, as individuals interpret and make sense of their experiences differently
- Recognizes the researcher’s role in co-creating meaning during the data collection and analysis process
- Aligns with an interpretivist or social constructionist paradigm
2. Select the Analytical Model(s)
Decide which model(s) to use in analyzing narrative data. Different models focus on different features of narratives and raise distinct questions during analysis.
Research design, informed by the chosen epistemological approach, will guide decisions regarding the use of single or multiple models.
- Structural Model: Examines the structure of stories and the ways in which they are told. Considers elements such as plot, characters, setting, and narrative arc
- Thematic Model: Analyzes the content of stories, focusing on the themes around which stories are told. May involve coding the data to identify recurrent themes and organizing them into categories or hierarchies
- Interactional/Performative Model: Investigates the contextual features that shape the construction of narratives and how meaning is collaboratively created through interaction between storytellers and listeners.
3. Select Narratives to Analyze
In conducting narrative analysis involves selecting specific narratives to analyze within the larger dataset. Even when the aim is to analyze the data holistically, researchers often choose to focus on particular narratives for close scrutiny.
This selection process is guided by the research questions, theoretical framework, and the analytical strategy employed in the study.
When selecting narratives to analyze, researchers may consider the following:
- Representativeness : Choosing narratives that are representative of the broader dataset or the phenomena under investigation. This may involve selecting narratives that exemplify common themes, patterns, or experiences shared by multiple participants.
- Uniqueness : Identifying narratives that stand out as unique, unusual, or deviant cases. These narratives may offer valuable insights into the diversity of experiences or challenge dominant patterns or assumptions.
- Theoretical relevance : Selecting narratives that are particularly relevant to the theoretical framework or concepts guiding the study. These narratives may help illuminate or expand upon key theoretical ideas.
- Richness of data : Choosing narratives that are rich in detail, providing thick descriptions and in-depth insights into the participants’ experiences, thoughts, and emotions.
4. Identifying Narrative Blocks
A narrative block refers to a complete, self-contained story or narrative within a larger dataset, such as an interview transcript.
It is a segment of the data that has a clear beginning, middle, and end, and that conveys a specific experience, event, or perspective of the participant.
This involves looking for cues like “entrance and exit talk”, which signal the beginning and end of a distinct narrative within a conversation.
For instance, phrases like, “There was this one time…” or “Let me give you an example…” may signal the beginning of a narrative block.
Similarly, phrases like, “So that’s how that wrapped up…” or “That is a pretty classic example of…” can help researchers pinpoint the end of a narrative block
It is important to note that the selection of narratives and units of analysis is an iterative process, and researchers may revisit and refine their choices as they delve deeper into the data and their analysis progresses.
Researchers should be transparent about their selection criteria and process, and should reflect on how their choices may impact the interpretation and findings of the study.
Here’s an example of what a narrative block might look like:
“I remember when I first started college. I was so nervous and excited at the same time. I didn’t know anyone on campus, and I was worried about fitting in. But during orientation week, I met this group of people who were just as lost and nervous as I was. We bonded over our shared experiences and became fast friends. That group of friends made all the difference in my college experience. We supported each other through the ups and downs, and I don’t think I would have made it through without them.”
This narrative block has a clear beginning (starting college), middle (meeting friends during orientation week), and end (reflecting on the importance of those friendships throughout college).
It conveys a specific experience and perspective of the participant, making it a suitable unit for narrative analysis.
5. Code Narrative Blocks
In conducting narrative analysis involves coding the narrative blocks using one or multiple analytical models.
Coding is the process of assigning labels or categories to segments of data, allowing researchers to organize, retrieve, and interpret the information in a systematic manner.
The coding process may involve several rounds or iterations, as researchers refine their codes and categories based on their deepening understanding of the data.
There are two main approaches to coding narrative blocks:
It’s important to note that these classifications are not always clear-cut, and researchers may use a combination of inductive and deductive approaches in their analysis.
For example, a researcher might start with a deductive structural analysis, using a predefined model of narrative structure, but then switch to an inductive thematic analysis to identify emergent themes within each structural element.
Inductive Coding
This approach, starting with the data and allowing themes and categories to emerge from the narratives aligns with a constructivist approach, where meaning is viewed as co-created between the researcher and the participant.
Researchers using inductive coding might identify emergent themes in the narratives about “life events” and code these narrative blocks accordingly.
For example, stories about deciding to have children could be coded as “Narratives about deciding to have children”.
- Also known as “open coding” or “data-driven coding”
- Involves allowing themes and categories to emerge from the data itself, rather than imposing pre-existing frameworks or theories
- Researchers immerse themselves in the narrative data, identifying patterns, similarities, and differences across the stories
- Codes are developed based on the researcher’s interpretation of the data and are refined iteratively throughout the analysis process
- Aligns with a constructivist approach, acknowledging the researcher’s role in co-creating meaning and the possibility of multiple interpretations
Deductive Coding
This approach, using pre-existing frameworks or theories to guide the coding process, aligns with a naturalist approach, where the researcher seeks to objectively identify and categorize elements of the narratives.
One such framework is the one proposed by Labov (1997), which identifies six key elements of a story:
- Abstract : A summary or overview of the story, often provided at the beginning
- Orientation : The setting or context of the story, including information about the time, place, characters, and situation
- Complicating Action : The main plot or sequence of events that drive the story forward, often involving a problem, challenge, or conflict
- Evaluation : The storyteller’s commentary on the meaning or significance of the events, revealing their attitudes, opinions, or emotions
- Resolution : The outcome or conclusion of the story, often resolving the complicating action or providing a sense of closure
- Coda : An optional element that brings the story back to the present or reflects on its broader implications
When using this framework for deductive coding, researchers would analyze each narrative block, looking for segments that correspond to these six elements. They would then assign the appropriate code to each segment, such as “Abstract,” “Orientation,” “Complicating Action,” and so on.
Here’s an example of how this might be applied to a narrative block:
“I remember my first day at my new job [Orientation]. I was so nervous and excited at the same time [Evaluation]. As soon as I walked in, I realized I had forgotten my employee ID [Complicating Action]. I panicked and thought I would be fired on the spot [Evaluation]. But then my manager came over, laughed, and said, ‘Don’t worry, it happens to everyone. We’ll get you a new one.’ [Resolution] That moment taught me that it’s okay to make mistakes and that my new workplace was actually pretty understanding [Coda].”
By applying Labov’s story structure framework, researchers can systematically analyze the narrative data, identifying patterns in how stories are structured and told.
This can provide insights into the way individuals make sense of their experiences and construct meaning through storytelling.
Step 6: Delve into the Story Structure
This step involves a deep and systematic examination of the coded narrative data, with a focus on understanding how the narrators use story structure elements (e.g., abstract, orientation, complicating action, evaluation, resolution, and coda) to construct meaning and convey their experiences.
By delving into the story structure, researchers can identify patterns, themes, and variations across different narratives, and gain insights into the ways in which individuals make sense of their lives through storytelling.
It allows researchers to move beyond the surface level of the narratives and to gain a deeper understanding of how individuals use storytelling to make sense of their lives and multifaceted nature of human experience.
This involves:
- Researchers organize the coded narrative data by grouping together segments that belong to the same story structure element (e.g., all “orientation” segments, all “complicating action” segments, etc.).
- This allows researchers to compare and contrast how different narrators use each story structure element, and to identify patterns, themes, and variations across the narratives.
- Researchers closely examine the content of each coded segment, paying attention to the specific details, descriptions, and evaluations provided by the narrators.
- They also consider the function of each story structure element, i.e., how it contributes to the overall meaning and coherence of the narrative.
- For example, researchers might analyze how narrators use the “orientation” element to set the scene, introduce characters, and provide context for their stories, or how they use the “evaluation” element to convey their attitudes, emotions, and reflections on the events being narrated.
- Researchers seek to understand how narrators make sense of their experiences and construct meaning through the way they structure and tell their stories.
- This involves considering the interplay between story structure, content, and context, and how these elements shape the overall meaning and significance of the narratives.
- Researchers may also consider the narrator’s perspective, the audience and social context of the storytelling, and the broader cultural and historical frameworks that inform the narratives.
Throughout this process, researchers need to be aware of the challenges and complexities of interpretation, such as the fact that narrators may not always follow a linear or coherent story structure, or that different individuals may attribute different meanings to similar experiences.
Researchers should aim to provide nuanced and contextualized descriptions of their findings, supported by relevant examples and quotes from the narratives.
Step 7: Compare Across Story Structure
This step involves a comparative analysis of the narrative data, looking for patterns, similarities, and differences in how story structure elements are used across different narratives.
In the previous step (Step 6: Delve into the Story Structure), researchers examined each story structure element in depth, analyzing its content, function, and meaning within individual narratives.
In Step 7, the focus shifts to a higher-level analysis, where researchers compare and contrast the use of story structure elements across the entire dataset.
The goal is to provide a comprehensive and integrative understanding of the narrative data, one that goes beyond the analysis of individual stories and reveals the broader patterns, meanings, and significance of storytelling in human experience.
This comparative analysis can be done in several ways:
- Researchers look for similarities and differences in how different individuals use each story structure element (e.g., orientation, complicating action, resolution) to construct their narratives.
- This can reveal patterns in how people from different backgrounds, experiences, or perspectives structure and tell their stories.
- Researchers may also compare the use of story structure elements across different types of narratives, such as life stories, event narratives, or turning point narratives.
- This can help identify genre-specific patterns or conventions in how stories are structured and told.
- Researchers may consider how the social, cultural, or historical context in which narratives are produced influences the way story structure elements are used.
- For example, they may compare narratives told in different settings (e.g., interviews, social media, public speeches), or at different points in time, to see how context shapes the structure and content of stories.
Throughout this comparative analysis, researchers should remain attentive to the overarching narrative and the broader themes and meanings that emerge from the data.
While breaking down narratives into specific story structure elements can provide valuable insights, it’s important not to lose sight of the holistic nature of narratives and the way in which different elements work together to create meaning.
Researchers should also be reflexive about their own role in the analysis process, acknowledging how their own backgrounds, assumptions, and interpretive frameworks may shape their understanding of the narratives.
They should strive to provide a balanced and nuanced account of their findings, highlighting both the commonalities and the variations in how story structure elements are used across different narratives.
By comparing story structure elements across the dataset, researchers can generate new insights and theories about the ways in which individuals use storytelling to make sense of their lives and experiences.
They may identify common patterns or structures that underlie different types of narratives, or they may discover how particular social, cultural, or historical factors shape the way stories are told.
Step 8: Tell the Core Narrative
This step involves synthesizing the insights and findings from the previous steps into a coherent and compelling narrative account that captures the essence of the research participants’ experiences and the key themes and meanings that emerged from the analysis.
At this stage, researchers have thoroughly examined the narrative data, coding and analyzing it at various levels, from the specific story structure elements to the broader patterns and comparisons across narratives.
They have gained a deep understanding of how participants use storytelling to make sense of their lives and experiences, and how different factors (such as social, cultural, or historical context) shape the way stories are told.
In Step 8, researchers aim to distill this complex and multifaceted understanding into a clear and concise narrative that conveys the core insights and conclusions of the study.
The goal is to provide a powerful and insightful narrative account that captures the richness and complexity of the research participants’ experiences, and that contributes to a deeper understanding of the ways in which storytelling shapes and reflects human lives and meanings.
By telling the core narrative, researchers can communicate the significance and relevance of their findings to a wider audience, and contribute to ongoing conversations and debates in their field and beyond.
- Researchers review the findings from the previous steps and identify the most salient and significant themes and meanings that emerged from the analysis.
- These themes may relate to the content of the narratives (e.g., common experiences, challenges, or turning points), the structure of the narratives (e.g., common patterns or variations in how stories are told), or the broader social and cultural factors that shape the narratives.
- Researchers organize the key themes and findings into a logical and compelling narrative that tells the “core story” of the research participants’ experiences.
- This may involve selecting illustrative examples or quotes from the narratives to support and enrich the main points, and providing interpretive commentary to guide the reader’s understanding.
- Researchers should aim to create a narrative that is both faithful to the complexity and diversity of the participants’ experiences and clear and accessible to the intended audience.
- In telling the core narrative, researchers should also consider the broader implications and significance of their findings, both for the specific field of study and for understanding human experience more generally.
- This may involve discussing how the findings relate to existing theories or debates in the field, identifying new questions or directions for future research, or highlighting the practical applications or social relevance of the study.
Ethical Considerations in Narrative Analysis
Researchers face the challenge of balancing the need to provide faithful accounts of participant stories with the ethical obligation to interpret those stories in a way that respects the participants and avoids misrepresentation.
This requires nuance and sensitivity, acknowledging the ambiguities inherent in narrative data.
Reflexivity and Positionality
Researchers should acknowledge their role in shaping all aspects of the research process, including the interpretation of narratives.
Researchers need to be aware of their own subjectivity and how their experiences, assumptions, and perspectives could influence their interpretations of participants’ narratives.
This awareness, often referred to as reflexivity, involves critically examining one’s own assumptions and being conscious of potential biases throughout every stage of the research process.
Researchers are encouraged to maintain field journals to track their thoughts and experiences, which can provide valuable insights into their influence on the research.
- Transparency is Crucial: Researchers must be transparent about their positionality, clearly articulating how their background and perspectives have shaped their understanding of the data.
- Reflexive Journals: Researchers can utilize reflexive journals to document feelings and thoughts throughout the research process, particularly during data analysis, helping to distinguish personal biases from participant perspectives.
- Team-Based Reflexivity: In team-based research, researchers should engage in open communication with their colleagues, sharing their reflexive insights and perspectives to ensure a well-rounded understanding of the data.
Respecting Participants’ Voices
Ethical narrative analysis emphasizes the importance of representing participants’ stories in a way that is true to their experiences.
Ethical narrative analysis prioritizes representing participants’ stories in a manner that accurately reflects their lived experiences, ensuring their voices are heard and their perspectives are not misrepresented.
This can include involving participants in the interpretation of their narratives and giving them a voice in how their stories are shared.
This can involve:
- Participant Involvement: Researchers can involve participants in the interpretation of their narratives, giving them a voice in deciding how their stories are shared [VI, 15].
- Member Checking: Sharing transcripts, analyses, and publications with research participants is a common practice in narrative research, allowing for further dialogue and ensuring accurate representation.
- Collaborative Meaning-Making: Researchers should approach interviews as opportunities for collaborative meaning-making, recognizing that interviewees have their own agendas and interpretations of the interactions. Researchers should validate participant experiences without judgment, encouraging them to tell their stories authentically.
- Ethical Interviewing: Researchers must adopt ethical interviewing practices, gaining informed consent, guaranteeing anonymity, and being sensitive to potential distress caused by interview questions.
Strengths of Narrative Analysis
Narrative analysis is a powerful tool for qualitative research, offering several strengths.
- Rich Insights into Human Experience : Narrative analysis stands out for its ability to generate rich, nuanced insights into the complexities of human experience. Unlike other methods that might overlook individual perspectives, narrative analysis centers on personal stories, capturing the unique ways individuals perceive, interpret, and make sense of their lives and experiences.
- Exploring Underlying Meanings : This method enables researchers to go beyond superficial descriptions, uncovering the underlying meanings, motivations, and interpretations embedded within personal narratives. By examining the stories people tell, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the beliefs, values, and cultural contexts that shape those experiences.
- Versatility and Broad Applications : Narrative analysis offers flexibility in its application, proving valuable for a wide range of research topics, particularly those focused on social, personal, cultural, or ideological phenomena. This approach proves particularly well-suited for exploring topics where individual perspectives and experiences are central to understanding the phenomenon under investigation.
- Democratizing Data Analysis : By focusing on the narratives of individuals, narrative analysis offers a democratizing approach to research. This method values the insights and interpretations individuals have about their own experiences, often contrasting with broader societal, cultural, and political factors. This approach acknowledges that individuals possess valuable understandings of their own lives, contributing to a more comprehensive and inclusive research process.
Let’s illustrate these strengths with a specific research example. Imagine investigating the experiences and beliefs of individuals facing social marginalization.
Narrative analysis, in this context, would allow researchers to closely examine the stories told by people within marginalized groups.
By identifying recurring patterns, symbols, or motifs within their narratives, researchers could shed light on how these individuals make sense of their experiences, revealing the often-hidden impacts of social marginalization.
Weaknesses of Narrative Analysis
- It can be time-consuming: Narrative analysis can require a significant time investment to analyze source data, especially when long-form stories are involved. Researchers must also be knowledgeable about the author’s cultural context and consider other interpretations of the narrative.
- Reliability and generalizability are limited: Because narrative analysis relies heavily on subjective interpretation of the narrative, the findings cannot usually be generalized to larger populations or empirically verified. Although conclusions about the cultural context might be drawn, they are based on anecdotal data, making them unsuitable as a basis for theory development.
- Labov’s model is not appropriate for all types of narratives: While Labov’s model can be useful for analyzing monological narratives, it is not suitable for conversational narratives, interactional discourses, or co-constructed stories. This is because the model primarily focuses on analyzing monological narratives collected through interviews like oral histories or life stories, rather than conversational interviews.
- Timelines may oversimplify life stories: While timelines can be a useful tool for organizing large amounts of narrative data, they have limitations. Summarizing and quantifying narrative data in this way risks reducing the complexity and oversimplifying the stories of individuals. Additionally, timelines may not fully capture the episodic nature of narratives, which often unfold non-linearly.
Further Information
For narrative analysis.
- Bamberg, M. (2006) Stories: Big or small. Why do we care? Narrative Inquiry, 16(1):139–147.
- Bamberg, M. (2012) Narrative analysis, in H. Cooper, P.M. Camic, D.L. Long, A.T. Panter, D. Rindskopf and K. Sher (eds), APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol. 2. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 85–102.
- De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2012). Analyzing narrative Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
- Gee, P. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Holstein, J., & Gubrium, J. (Eds.). (2012). Varieties of narrative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
- Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
LABOVIAN MODEL
Labov’s Narrative Model, developed by sociolinguist William Labov, is a structural approach to analyzing narratives that focuses on the formal properties and organizational features of stories.
Labov identified six key elements that he argued are present in fully-formed oral narratives: abstract, orientation, complicating action, evaluation, resolution, and coda.
- Labov, W. (1997). Further steps in narrative analysis. Journal of Narrative and Life History (7 ),395–415.
- Labov, W. and Waletzky J. (1997) Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7 (1–4): 3–38.
- McCormack, C. (2004). Storying stories: a narrative approach to in-depth interview conversations. International journal of social research methodology , 7 (3), 219-236.
- Patterson, W. (2008). Narratives of events: Labovian narrative analysis and its limitations. Doing narrative research , 22-40.
POLKINGHORNE MODEL
The Polkinghorne Model, developed by psychologist Donald Polkinghorne, is a narrative approach to understanding human experience and meaning-making.
According to Polkinghorne, narratives are not simply a way of representing or communicating experience, but are the primary means through which we construct and make sense of our lives.
He argued that narratives are a fundamental form of human cognition, and that we use stories to organize and interpret our experiences, to create coherence and continuity in our sense of self, and to navigate the social and cultural worlds we inhabit.
One of the key features of the Polkinghorne Model is its emphasis on the interpretive and constructivist nature of narrative analysis.
Polkinghorne argued that narratives are not simply a reflection of an objective reality, but are always shaped by the social, cultural, and historical contexts in which they are told, as well as by the individual’s own perspective and meaning-making processes.
- Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International journal of qualitative studies in education , 8 (1), 5-23.
- Polkinghorne, D. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences . Suny Press.
- Polkinghorne, D. E. (2007). Validity issues in narrative research. Qualitative inquiry , 13 (4), 471-486.
MISHLER MODEL
Elliot Mishler, a social psychologist and professor at Harvard Medical School, developed an influential model for analyzing narratives in the context of medical encounters.
The Mishler Model, also known as the “Narrative Functions Model,” focuses on the interactive and collaborative nature of storytelling in medical interviews, and examines how patients and healthcare providers co-construct meaning through their dialogue.
- Mishler, E. G. (1995). Models of narrative analysis: A typology. Journal of narrative and life history , 5 (2), 87-123.
- Mishler, E. G. (1986). The analysis of interview-narratives (pp. 233-255). TR Sarbin (Ed.), Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct.
- Mishler, E. G. (2009). Storylines . Harvard University Press.
- Mishler, E. G. (1991). Research interviewing: Context and narrative . Harvard university press.
FOR VISUAL NARRATIVE ANALYSIS
- Bell, 5. E. (2002), Photo images: Jo Spence’s narratives of Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and with illness. Health An Interdisciplinary by post, 6 (1), 5-30.
- Pink, 5. (2004) Visual methods in C. Seale, G. Gobo, obrium, & D. Silverman (Eds), [Special issue) Qualitative Research Practice (pp. 361-378). London: Sage
- Adams, H. L. (2015). Insights into processes of posttraumatic growth through narrative analysis of chronic illness stories. Qualitative Psychology , 2 (2), 111.
- Ehsan, N., Riaz, M., & Khalily, T. (2019). Trauma of terror and displacement: A narrative analysis of mental health of women IDPS in KPK (Pakistan). Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology , 25 (2), 140.
- Fewings, E., & Quinlan, E. (2023). “It hasn’t gone away after 30 years.” late-career Australian psychologists’ experience of uncertainty throughout their career . Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 54 (3), 221–230.
- Skopp, N. A., Holland, K. M., Logan, J. E., Alexander, C. L., & Floyd, C. F. (2019). Circumstances preceding suicide in US soldiers: A qualitative analysis of narrative data. Psychological services , 16 (2), 302.
![Narrative Analysis In Qualitative Research 1 Print Friendly, PDF & Email](https://www.simplypsychology.org/wp-content/uploads/three-icons-with-text-light-blue.jpg)
Narrative Analysis
Cite this chapter.
- Phil Benson 5
7734 Accesses
11 Citations
Narrative analysis is a relatively recent addition to the toolkit of applied linguistics. Its basic premise is that the telling of stories can elucidate the meanings attached to participants’ experiences. These may be stories told by participants during data collection or stories constructed by researchers (sometimes in collaboration with participants) during analysis of a data set. This chapter is mainly concerned with uses of storytelling and narrative writing in data analysis and presentation of research findings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Subscribe and save.
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
- Available as PDF
- Read on any device
- Instant download
- Own it forever
- Available as EPUB and PDF
- Compact, lightweight edition
- Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
- Free shipping worldwide - see info
- Durable hardcover edition
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Institutional subscriptions
Similar content being viewed by others
Structural Narrative Analysis
Introduction
The Power and Possibility of Narrative Research: Challenges and Opportunities
Allen, D., & Katayama, A. (2016). Relative second language proficiency and the giving and receiving of written peer feedback. System, 56 , 96–106.
Google Scholar
Atkinson, R. (1998). The life story interview . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Barkhuizen, G. (2010). An extended positioning analysis of a pre-service teacher’s better life small story. Applied Linguistics, 31 (2), 282–300.
Barkhuizen, G. (2011). Narrative knowledging in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 45 (3), 391–414.
Barkhuizen, G. (2013). Introduction: Narrative research in applied linguistics. In G. Barkhuizen (Ed.), Narrative research in applied linguistics (pp. 1–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barkhuizen, G. (2014). Research timeline: Narrative research in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 47 (4), 450–466.
Barkhuizen, G., Benson, P., & Chik, A. (2013). Narrative inquiry in language teaching and learning research . London: Routledge.
Barkhuizen, G., & Wette, R. (2008). Narrative frames for investigating the experiences of language teachers. System, 36 (3), 372–387.
Bell, J. S. (2002). Narrative inquiry: More than just telling stories. TESOL Quarterly, 36 (2), 207–218.
Benson, P. (2004). (Autobiography) and learner diversity. In P. Benson & D. Nunan (Eds.), Learners’ stories: Difference and diversity in language learning (pp. 2–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Benson, P. (2011). Language learning careers as a unit of analysis in narrative research. TESOL Quarterly, 45 (3), 545–553.
Benson, P. (2013). Narrative writing as method: Second language identity development in study abroad. In G. Barkhuizen (Ed.), Narrative research in applied linguistics (pp. 244–263). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Benson, P. (2014). Narrative inquiry in applied linguistics research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34 , 154–170.
Benson, P., Barkhuizen, G., Bodycott, P., & Brown, J. (2013). Narratives of second language identity in study abroad . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Benson, P., & Cooker, L. (Eds.). (2013). The applied linguistic individual: Social approaches to identity agency and autonomy . London: Equinox.
Benson, P., & Nunan, D. (Eds.). (2002). The experience of language learning. Special issue of the Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics , 7 (2).
Benson, P., & Nunan, D. (Eds.). (2004). Learners’ stories: Difference and diversity in language learning . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brockmeier, J., & Carbaugh, D. (Eds.). (2001). Narrative and identity: Studies in autobiography, self and culture . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brooks, P. (1979). Fictions of the Wolfman: Freud and narrative understanding. Diacritics, 9 (1), 71–81.
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds: Possible worlds . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Canagarajah, A. S. (2012). Teacher development in a global profession: An autoethnography. TESOL Quarterly, 46 (2), 258–279.
Casanave, C. P. (2012). Diary of a dabbler: Ecological influences on an EFL teacher’s efforts to study Japanese informally. TESOL Quarterly, 46 (4), 642–670.
Chamberlayne, P., Bornat, J., & Wengraf, T. (Eds.). (2000). The turn to biographical methods in social science: Comparative issues and examples . London: Routledge.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Chik, A. (2014). Constructing German learner identities in online and offline environments. In D. Abendroth-Timmer & E. M. Henning (Eds.), Plurilingualism and multiliteracies: International research on identity construction in language education (pp. 161–176). Berlin: Peter Lang.
Chik, A., & Benson, P. (2008). Frequent flyer: A narrative of overseas study in English. In P. Kalaja, V. Menezes, & A. M. F. Barcelos (Eds.), Narratives of learning and teaching EFL (pp. 155–168). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Choi, J. (2012). Multivocal post-diasporic selves: Entangled in Korean dramas. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 11 (2), 109–123.
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: experience and story in qualitative research . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Curtis, A., & Romney, M. (Eds.). (2006). Color, race, and English language teaching: Shades of meaning . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2012). Analyzing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistics perspectives . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 733–768). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Ely, M. (2007). In-forming re-presentations. In J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 567–598). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Ferris, D. R., Liu, H., Sinha, A., & Senna, M. (2013). Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22 , 307–329.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Goodson, I., & Sikes, P. (2001). Life history research in educational settings: Learning from lives . Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Griffiths, C., Oxford, R. L., Kawai, Y., Kawai, C., Park, Y. Y., Ma, X., … Yang, N.-D. (2014). Focus on context: Narratives from East Asia. System, 43 , 50–63.
Harbon, L., & Moloney, R. (2013). Language teachers’ narratives of practice . Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Hayes, D. (2010). Duty and service: Life and career of a Tamil teacher English in Sri Lanka. TESOL Quarterly, 44 (1), 58–83.
Hoffman, E. (1989). Lost in translation: A life in a new language . London: Penguin.
Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (Eds.). (2012). Varieties of narrative analysis . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Johnson, K. E., & Golombek, P. R. (Eds.). (2002). Teachers’ narrative inquiry as professional development . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Josselson, R. (2007). Narrative research and the challenge of accumulating knowledge. In M. Bamberg (Ed.), Narrative: State of the art (pp. 7–16). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Josselson, R., & Lieblich, A. (Eds.). (1993). The narrative study of lives . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Kalaja, P., Menezes, V., & Barcelos, A. M. F. (Eds.). (2008). Narratives of learning and teaching EFL . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kasper, G., & Prior, M. T. (2015). Analyzing storytelling in TESOL interview research. TESOL Quarterly, 49 (2), 226–255.
Kinginger, C. (2004). Alice doesn’t live here anymore: Foreign language learning and identity reconstruction. In A. Pavlenko & A. Blackledge (Eds.), Negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts (pp. 219–242). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters LTD.
Kouritzin, S. (2000). Immigration mothers redefine access to ESL classes: Contradiction and ambivalence. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 21 (1), 14–19.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, LA: Sage Publications.
Lee, I., & Sze, P. (Eds.). (2015). Voices from the frontline: Narratives of nonnative English speaking teachers . Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Liu, Y., & Xu, Y. (2011). Inclusion or exclusion? A narrative inquiry of a language teacher’s identity experience in the ‘new work order’ of competing pedagogies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27 (3), 589–597.
López-Gopar, M. E. (2014). Teaching English critically to Mexican children. ELT Journal, 68 (3), 310–320.
Mann, S. (2011). A critical review of qualitative interviews in Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 32 (1), 6–24.
McAdams, D. P. (2012). Exploring psychological themes through life-narrative accounts. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Varieties of narrative analysis (pp. 15–32). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Menard-Warwick, J. (2004). “I always had the desire to progress a little”: Gendered narratives of immigrant language learners. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 3 (4), 295–311.
Menezes, V. (2011). Affordances for language learning beyond the classroom. In P. Benson & H. Reinders (Eds.), Beyond the language classroom (pp. 59–71). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Moodie, I. (2016). The anti-apprenticeship of observation: How negative prior language learning experience influences English language teachers’ beliefs and practices. System, 60 , 29–41.
Murphey, T., & Carpenter, C. (2008). The seeds of agency in language learning histories. In P. Kalaja, V. Menezes, & A. M. F. Barcelos (Eds.), Narratives of learning and teaching EFL (pp. 17–34). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Murray, G. (2009). Narrative inquiry. In J. Heigham & R. Croker (Eds.), Qualitative research in applied linguistics (pp. 45–65). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Murray, G., & Kojima, M. (2007). Out-of-class learning: One learner’s story. In P. Benson (Ed.), Learner autonomy 8: Insider perspectives on autonomy in language teaching and learning (pp. 25–40). Dublin: Authentik.
Nikula, T., & Pitkänen-Huhta, A. (2008). Using photographs to access stories of learning English. In P. Kalaja, V. Menezes, & A. M. F. Barcelos (Eds.), Narratives of learning and teaching ELF (pp. 171–185). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Nunan, D., & Choi, J. (Eds.). (2010). Language and culture: Reflective narratives and the emergence of identity . London: Routledge.
O’Móchain, R. (2006). Discussing gender and sexuality in a context-appropriate way: Queer narratives in an EFL college classroom in Japan. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 5 (1), 51–66.
Oxford, R. L., Rubin, J., Chamot, A. U., Schramm, K., Lavine, R., Gunning, P., & Nel, C. (2014). The learning strategy prism: Perspectives of learning strategy experts. System, 43 , 30–49.
Palfreyman, D. M. (2014). The ecology of learner autonomy. In G. Murray (Ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 175–191). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pavlenko, A. (2002). Narrative study: Whose story is it, anyway? TESOL Quarterly, 36 (2), 213–218.
Pavlenko, A. (2007). Autobiographic narratives as data in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 28 (2), 163–188.
Pinner, R. (2016). Trouble in paradise: Self-assessment and the Tao. Language Teaching Research, 20 (2), 181–195.
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2017). Multiple regression as a flexible alternative to ANOVA in L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39 , 579–592.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences . Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. Qualitative Studies in Education, 8 (1), 5–23.
Pomerantz, A., & Kearney, E. (2012). Beyond ‘write-talk-revise-(repeat)’: Using narrative to understand one multilingual student’s interactions around writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21 (3), 221–238.
Richardson, L. (1994). Writing: A method of Inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516–529). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Rieff, P. (1996). The collected papers of Sigmund Freud. Volume 7: Three case histories. New York, NY: Touchstone. (First published by Macmillan 1963)
Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis . Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Schmidt, R. W., & Frota, S. N. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237–326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Schumann, F. M., & Schumann, J. H. (1977). Diary of a language learner: An introspective study of second language learning. In H. D. Brown, C. A. Yorio, & R. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL ’77 teaching and learning English as a second language: Trends in research and practice (pp. 241–249). Washington, DC: TESOL.
Shedivy, S. L. (2004). Factors that lead some students to continue the study of foreign language past the usual 2 years in high school. System, 32 (1), 103–119.
Simpson, J. (2011). Telling tales: Discursive space and narratives in ESOL classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 22 (1), 10–22.
Takeuchi, O. (2003). What can we learn from good foreign language learners? A qualitative study in the Japanese foreign language context. System, 31 (3), 385–392.
Tanghe, S., & Park, G. (2016). “Build[ing] something which alone we could not have done”: International collaborative teaching and learning in language teacher education. System, 57 , 1–13.
Thomas, W. I., & Znaniecki, F. (1919). The Polish peasant in Europe and America: Monograph of an immigrant group (Vol. 3). Boston, MA: Richard G. Badger.
Tsui, A. B. M. (2007). The complexities of identity formation: A narrative inquiry of an EFL teacher. TESOL Quarterly, 41 (4), 657–680.
Umino, T., & Benson, P. (2016). Communities of practice in study abroad: A four-year study of an Indonesian student’s experience in Japan. Modern Language Journal, 100 (4), 1–18.
Van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective . Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Willis, G. (1991). Phenomenological inquiry: Life-world perceptions. In E. C. Short (Ed.), Forms of curriculum inquiry (pp. 173–186). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Wyatt, M., & Márquez, C. P. (2016). Helping first-year undergraduates engage in language research. Language Teaching Research, 20 (2), 146–164.
Xu, Y. (2014). Becoming researchers: A narrative study of Chinese university EFL teachers’ research practice and their professional identity. Language Teaching Research, 18 (2), 242–259.
Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2015). Understanding EFL students’ participation in group peer feedback of L2 writing: A case study from an activity theory perspective. Language Teaching Research, 19 (5), 572–593.
Zheng, X., & Borg, S. (2014). Task-based learning and teaching in China: Secondary school teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, 18 (2), 205–221.
Download references
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
Phil Benson
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Phil Benson .
Editor information
Editors and affiliations.
Sydney School of Education and Social Work, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Aek Phakiti
Department of Linguistics, Germanic, Slavic, Asian and African Languages, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
Peter De Costa
Applied Linguistics, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
Luke Plonsky
School of Education, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Sue Starfield
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Benson, P. (2018). Narrative Analysis. In: Phakiti, A., De Costa, P., Plonsky, L., Starfield, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1_26
Download citation
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1_26
Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN : 978-1-137-59899-8
Online ISBN : 978-1-137-59900-1
eBook Packages : Social Sciences Social Sciences (R0)
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Publish with us
Policies and ethics
- Find a journal
- Track your research
Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
Narrative Analysis
- Most Cited Papers
- Most Downloaded Papers
- Newest Papers
- Last »
- Narrative Theory Follow Following
- Narrative Follow Following
- Narrative and Identity Follow Following
- Narrative Methods Follow Following
- Narratology Follow Following
- Discourse Analysis Follow Following
- Narrative Inquiry Follow Following
- Narrative and interpretation Follow Following
- Storytelling Follow Following
- Digital Narrative Follow Following
Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.
- Academia.edu Journals
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
- Find new research papers in:
- Health Sciences
- Earth Sciences
- Cognitive Science
- Mathematics
- Computer Science
- Academia ©2024
![narrative analysis research paper Mel wright-bevans](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/11431281247042021-1716546327403_Q64/Mel-Wright-Bevans.jpg)
- Keele University
What is best practice for conducting narrative synthesis for systematic literature review?
Top contributors to discussions in this field.
![narrative analysis research paper Dr.Mohammad Ahmad Abdalla](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/285109153484803-1444986727463_Q64/Drmohammad-Abdalla-2.jpg)
- Tikrit University
![narrative analysis research paper Dimitar Vasileff Georgieff](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/660848481681410-1534569964529_Q64/Dimitar-Georgieff.jpg)
- Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University
![narrative analysis research paper Sharun Khan](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/11431281170073848-1687594681096_Q64/Sharun-Khan.jpg)
- Indian Veterinary Research Institute
![narrative analysis research paper George Hershell](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/786951598772225-1564635290662_Q64/George-Hershell.jpg)
- Institute for Industrial Research & Toxicology
Get help with your research
Join ResearchGate to ask questions, get input, and advance your work.
All Answers (3)
![narrative analysis research paper narrative analysis research paper](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/11431281260983566-1721300077056_Q64/Maasuur-Demian-Deakaa.jpg)
Similar questions and discussions
- Asked 10 April 2024
![narrative analysis research paper Adama M. Kolley](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/11431281241927059-1715287929052_Q64/Adama-Kolley.jpg)
- Asked 2 May 2024
![narrative analysis research paper Abdul Salaam Al-Moosawi](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/11431281230808280-1711113657047_Q64/Abdul-Salaam-Al-Moosawi.jpg)
- Asked 21 July 2024
![narrative analysis research paper Alexander Ohnemus](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/11431281174958058-1689466081198_Q64/Alexander-Ohnemus.jpg)
- Asked 25 June 2024
- Asked 11 May 2024
![narrative analysis research paper Abu-Hussein Muhamad](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/11431281102846055-1669542525574_Q64/Abu-Hussein-Muhamad.jpg)
- Asked 23 February 2024
![narrative analysis research paper Md Al Mustanjid](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/11431281188457964-1694624149337_Q64/Md-Al-Mustanjid-2.jpg)
- Shall we update the time intervals?
- Should we update and rewrite both the findings and the article?
- Asked 29 January 2024
![narrative analysis research paper Osama Bahnas](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/11431281233591166-1712088987469_Q64/Osama-Bahnas.jpg)
- Asked 27 November 2023
![narrative analysis research paper Anna Martirosyan](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/1114321908187144-1642686454869_Q64/Anna-Martirosyan-2.jpg)
Related Publications
![narrative analysis research paper Claudio Quagliarotti](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/11431281082053964-1661957282955_Q64/Claudio-Quagliarotti.jpg)
- Recruit researchers
- Join for free
- Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up
![](http://rss3.fun/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Narrative analysis is a qualitative research methodology that involves examining and interpreting the stories or narratives people tell in order to gain insights into the meanings, experiences, and perspectives that underlie them. Narrative analysis can be applied to various forms of communication, including written texts, oral interviews, and ...
Let's recap. In this post, we've explored the basics of narrative analysis in qualitative research. The key takeaways are: Narrative analysis is a qualitative analysis method focused on interpreting human experience in the form of stories or narratives.; There are two overarching approaches to narrative analysis: the inductive (exploratory) approach and the deductive (confirmatory) approach.
Data analysis in narrative research includes four stages: (1) prepar ing the data, (2) identifying basic units of data, (3) organizing data, and (4) interpretation of data as suggested by Newby ...
Narrative analysis is a method with a particular history and epistemology, and it is designed to answer certain types of research questions. As part of the growing recognition of the value and legitimacy of qualitative inquiry in psychology, narrative analysis is becoming increasingly articulated and refined.
Communicating critical narrative research requires personal involvement in how the researcher understands the stories of participants related to time and context, in a manner that establishes coherence and is connected to knowledge of existence through the systematic process of data collection, analysis, and interpretations into textual ...
Narrative analysis in qualitative research is an invaluable tool to understand how people's stories and ability to self-narrate reflect the human experience. Qualitative data analysis can be improved through coding and organizing complete narratives. By doing so, researchers can conclude how humans process and move through decisions and life ...
Narrative analysis is a qualitative research method used to understand how individuals create stories from their personal experiences. There is an emphasis on understanding the context in which a narrative is constructed, recognizing the influence of historical, cultural, and social factors on storytelling.
The narrative turn (Polkinghorne cited in Goodson & Gill, 2011) is a term used primarily in literary studies, social, and human sciences and expresses a shift toward legitimizing peoples' stories as important sources of empirical knowledge (Hyvarinen, 2010).Although it is difficult to articulate an exact time frame, the turn toward narrative can be situated within the "science wars" of ...
Narrative analysis uses stories to describe human experience and action. Because people give meaning to their lives through the stories they tell, it seems appropriate for those who study human ...
In social. research, 'narrative' refers to a diversity of t opics of study, methods of investigation and analysis, and theoretical orientations. It develops different definitions within ...
Understanding qualitative research data analysis is definitely the first step to conduct narrative . data analysis. I always think that we are qualitative researchers before narrative researchers. Hence, understanding qualitative research analysis will greatly inform us, who are about to go into the details of narrative data analysis.
Narrative research is a type of qualitative method that is understood from spoken or written texts describing accounts of events which are chronologically connected (Czarniawska, 2004).Narrative research can be described as a methodology of studying individual lived experiences as a source of knowledge in and of itself that warrants deeper understanding (Clandinin & Huber, 2010; Mitchell ...
superintendents. This study employed a qualitative narrative research design. Narrative content was analyzed, using a combination of deductive and inductive approaches. Seven conclusions emerged from this study. First, experiences and activities that are associated with leadership and that occur in non-formal settings were important for leadership
Narrative inquiry is a broad term that can best be defined as any approach to research that makes use of stories or storytelling. Narrative research can be defined similarly, and in this sense, both are catchall terms that elude precise definition (Barkhuizen, 2014).Polkinghorne identified two broad approaches to narrative research, which he called analysis of narratives and narrative analysis.
A Narrative Analysis of COVID-19 Stories as Told by WSU Research Students ... Our paper ties in with this sentiment, as the voices of the people of the Eastern Cape ... Content analysis was used to analyze the texts produced by the students. Krippendorff (1989, p. 403) defines content analysis as "a research technique for making replicable ...
strongly on narrative analysis as a qualitative research method, pointing toward possibilities for other research practices whenever appropriate. The Emergence of Narrative Analysis Having clarifi ed that narrative analysis is invested in both the means and the way these means are put to use to arrive at presentations and interpretations of
An inductive, thematic analysis (i.e. a formal method to analyse narrative inquiries) was employed to gain insights into and particularly gleaning for participants' meaning in the narratives ...
My point of departure is that the narrative approach is a frame of reference, a way of reflecting during the entire inquiry process, a research method, and a mode for representing the research study. Hence, the narrative approach is both the phenomenon and the method (Connelly & Clandinin, 1990), a postulate that some might find rather ...
A new methodology for the narrative and thymic analysis in Chopin's last style. This paper is about a methodology which wants to represent in an innovative way the musical work's narrativity and expression according to the moments of tension and detente created by the relations between the different topics.
Narrative research is a qualitative research methodology in the narrative inquiry tradition. Narrative inquiries elicit and analyze stories in order to understand people, cultures, and societies.
narrative analysis, and how this is manifested in my case study. Qualitative interviews as foundation for narrative analysis. The purpose of qualitative studies is to get in-depth-knowledge about ...
This paper considers the effectiveness of narrative inquiry as a research method in collecting and analyzing stories from a purposive sample of intensive care nurses and doctors, regarding their perceptions of the factors that influence decision-making in relation to the withdrawal of life sustaining treatment.
These narrative tool are discussed in great detail by Gerald Prince an American academic and literary theoretician, in an brief essay published in first issue of Style in 1988 This paper will ...
Best practices for conducting a narrative synthesis in a systematic literature review involve several key steps: defining a clear review question and objectives, developing a detailed protocol ...