- Phone: +91 8466016171
- Whatsapp: +91 8208375580
- Email: contact@leapscholar.com
![](http://rss3.fun/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
Government And Society IELTS Essay: Writing Task 2 Samples
- Last Updated On July 30, 2024
- Published In IELTS Preparation đ»
![government and society essay government and society ielts essay](https://leapscholar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/shutterstock_1269355039-1-1024x576.png)
The IELTS Writing Task 2 can have a large variety of questions, so it can never be predicted which question you will get in the IELTS exam. However, there still are some common IELTS essay topics that many students have reported as repeated in the IELTS exam. Thus, the general theme or the essay topics can be determined. In this blog, we discuss the Government And Society IELTS Essay.
Table of Content
As an IELTS exam aspirant, it is important you go through as many common topics for Writing Task 2 as possible. One such common IELTS test theme is âgovernment and society’. This theme can form a multitude of questions for the second writing task. Therefore, students should go through some sample answers for Government IELTS Writing task 2.
![government and society essay ielts](https://leapscholar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/cta-team.jpg)
Excel in IELTS with Indiaâs Top Online Coaching
Leap has helped more than 1 Lakh students achieve 7+ IELTS band.
![government and society essay government and society ielts essay](https://leapscholar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/shutterstock_2099198281-1024x576.jpg)
Types of Questions
There are several types of questions that can be framed from the government essay topics for Writing Task 2 in IELTS. Let’s take a look at the two primary kinds of possible questions that you may be presented within the exam:
Opinion-based
These questions will describe two sides of an argument to you. You will be required to either discuss both and then give your opinion, or pick one side and give your opinion on why that is logical and more sound than the other side of the argument.
![government and society essay Government And Society IELTS Essay: Writing Task 2 Samples](https://leapscholar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/IELTS-Masterclass-Mobile.png)
Consult IELTS Expert for a Free Personalised Learning Plan
Improve your IELTS speaking score with a 1:1 consultation.
Descriptive
This type of question usually asks the aspirant to either enlist some advantages and disadvantages or mention some effects and possible solutions to a particular social problem. These questions can also ask you to share your opinion with the examiner in writing the essay.
Whatever the type of question you get in the exam, to get a good band score, there are some general tips that you should apply:
- Using excellent vocabulary and grammar is important to get a high band score in writing (as well as in speaking).
- Providing relevant examples is the secret to scoring well.
- Taking help from a mentor whenever you get stuck throughout your preparation can be very helpful to ensure you get a good band score. For this purpose, you can explore online platforms like LeapScholar that offer outstanding mentorship and preparation courses for IELTS .
Government And Society Writing Task 2 Topics With Answer
Explore all countries, sample answer 1.
Q: Some people believe that only the government can bring about significant changes in society, while others think that even an individual can have a lot of influence on society. What is your opinion on the above statement? You should take about 40 minutes for this answer and write a minimum of 250 words.
Ans: It is often advocated that the leadership of a country holds the supreme power in its hands to be able to change society for the better and get rid of all its cons. However, this view is flawed in my opinion as I believe that without the cooperation of every individual, there is only so much the government can do for societyâs betterment. The government can make strong policies and can mobilise resources for their execution, but the policy only yields the desired results when it is acted upon by all members of society. If the policy has been set in place, but no one acts in accordance with it, then it will never be able to achieve its stated primary objective. For instance, of late, many countries have come up with policies aligned with the goal of achieving lower carbon emissions by 2025. However, the individuals living in those countries assume a reckless attitude and hardly abide by the policy for curbing climate change. Hence, without individuals’ cooperation, the government cannot achieve any positive results. Moreover, the government’s efforts are often focused on driving results on a macro scale (nationwide). In contrast, an individual’s efforts will show results on a micro-level and can immediately lead to the betterment of society. The ruling party cannot become aware of all the problems their society faces in many regions. However, the people of the region will be well aware of the problems existing in their region. Thus, the individual holds more power to bring about immediate change in their locality with the help of the resources mobilised by the government on a large scale. For instance, if there is a flood in an Indian state, and the government comes up with an immediate disaster relief response, these efforts will bear more fruit when the individuals of the region cooperate in the rescue operations rather than leaving it all up to the politicians and their forces. In conclusion, I believe that individuals can bring about a more immediate impact on society when they work in tandem with the government.
Sample Answer 2
Q: The government should come up with policies to control the internet for reducing cybercrime and ensuring the safety of users. Do you agree or disagree?
Ans: The frequency of cybercrimes has rapidly surged in recent times and has become a cause of concern globally. With the aim of curbing the rate of cybercrime, some experts argue governments should regulate and control the various internet activities that users of a specific country engage in. I agree with this statement only partially because I believe the ambit of these policies should not be in violation of the fundamental rights of citizens. With the ever-increasing number of internet users, the incidence of cybercrimes is also on an upward trajectory. This can be controlled with government policies that protect users’ data. By protecting usersâ private data online, the government can get ahead of online predators looking to commit crimes (especially financial and bureaucratic ones) by making use of that data. For instance, by installing a strong technological architecture in place, the government can protect its country’s users’ data. This will have a significant impact on curbing the rate of cybercrimes committed by stealing personal data. Moreover, by mandating the nation’s organisations increase transparency, the leadership can ensure that online crimes are controlled and eliminated. By asking organisations to clearly state the kind of data they will be extracted from their online users and to educate users about netiquette (ânet etiquetteâ), the government can significantly reduce the nationâs cybercrime rate. For instance, Instagram informs its users about the kind of content that will be viewed as offensive or inappropriate and can lead to legal action. This has resulted in bringing down the incidents of hate speech online and reduced the incidence of fraud through phishing schemes on the platform.
![government and society essay government and society ielts essay](https://leapscholar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/shutterstock_1908851098-min-1024x576.png)
In summary, governments should definitely put in place policies with the aim of reducing cybercrime. However, these steps should not undermine their citizens’ rights. A primary way forward to tackle this issue would entail raising awareness and establishing a strong online infrastructure. To gain a good band score, Government And Society IELTS Essay should be tackled with a clear thought process and excellent writing skills. Don’t forget to read more sample answers and keep practising!
Frequently Asked Questions
1. how do i prepare for writing an essay for ielts task 2.
Ans: You should start your preparation by first strengthening your vocabulary and grammar. Thereon, you should start by reading  through some of the high band scoring model answers online, and then try to write answers for some common questions yourself.
2. What mistakes should I avoid in the IELTS writing task?
Ans: Certain pitfalls to avoid during writing the IELTS essay for task 2 are: a. Not taking time in the beginning to map out your main ideas for every paragraph b. Not proofreading your essay as it can lead to spelling and grammatical errors c. Not providing relevant examples
3. How can I get a band score of 8 in the IELTS writing exam?
Ans: The key tips of writing a high band scoring essay for IELTS task 2 are- Wide showcase of vocabulary, great sentence structuring, giving good examples and ensuring coherence between paragraphs.
Know More about IELTS
Ielts practice test material.
Know more about IELTS
Get free speaking practice samples.
- Describe a Skill That you can teach other people
- Describe a Place you Visited Where the Air was Polluted
- Describe a Famous Person that you are Interested in
- Describe a Course That You Want to Learn
- Describe a Person who Solved a Problem in Smart Way
- Describe a Prize That You Received
- Describe a Volunteering Experience You Have Had
- Describe a Piece of Good News
- Describe Something you Taught to Your Friend
- Talk About an Interesting Old Person you Met Recently
- Describe a Dinner you Really Enjoyed
- Describe a Story or Novel That Was Interesting to You
- Describe a Time When you Shared Something with Others
- Describe a Toy you Liked in Childhood
- Describe an Interesting Neighbour
- Describe a Competition You Would Like to Take Part In
- Describe an interesting activity that you remember enjoying most in your Primary School
- Describe Your Childhood Friend
- Describe an Object You Find Particularly Beautiful
- Describe a Place Where you are Able to Relax
- Describe a person you know who likes to talk a lot
- Describe a place where you would like to go to relax
- Describe a period when you were busy
- Describe a long-term goal you would like to achieve
- Describe a situation when you helped someone
- Describe a job you would not like to do in the future
- Describe a time when you used a map
- Describe a skill that you learned in your childhood
- Describe an unusual holiday you had
- Describe an exciting activity that you experienced with someone else
- Describe a person who is good at making people feel welcome in his/her home
- Describe A Time You Successfully Did Something Difficult
- Describe Something in Your Country That You Are Interested In
- Describe a Beautiful City
- Describe something you do regularly that helps you work and study better
- Describe a photo that you took and are proud of
- Describe a party that you enjoyed
- Describe a useful object in your home that you canât live without
- Describe a good advertisement that you think is useful
- Describe an occasion when someone or something made noise
- Describe a sportsperson that you admire
- Describe something that you picked up that was thrown by someone else
- Describe a time that something changed your life in good ways
- Describe a successful person who you once studied or worked with
Get Free Reading Practice Samples
- William henry perkin reading answers
- Why zoos are good reading answers
- Bioluminescence reading answers
- Classifying societies reading answers
- Artificial artists reading answers
- Jargon reading answers
- The Origins of Laughter Reading Answers
- The Innovation of Grocery Stores Reading Answers
- All About the Otter Reading Answers
- The Triune Brain Reading Answers
- Saving the Soil Reading Answers
- Trans Fatty Acids Reading Answers
- A Disaster of Titanic Proportions Reading Answers
- Why Companies Should Welcome Disorder Reading Answers
- Book Review Reading Answers
- Tea Times Reading Answers
- Why are Finland's Schools Successful Reading Answers
- Intelligence and Giftedness Reading Answers
- Animal Minds Parrot Alex Reading Answers
- Crop Growing Skyscrapers Reading Answers
- Secrets of the Swarm Reading Answers
- Walking with Dinosaurs Reading Answers
- The Development of Travel Under the Ocean Reading Answers
- What's so Funny Reading Answers
- The Culture of Chimpanzee Reading Answers
- Clutter Bugs Beware Reading Answer
- Stepwells Reading Answers
- Glaciers Reading Answers
Get Free Writing Practice Samples
- Advantages and Disadvantages Essay with Sample Answers
- Agree and Disagree Essay with Sample Answers
- Problem Solution Essay Topic with Sample Answers
- Every year several languages die out
- Positive or Negative Development Essay with Sample Answers
- Honesty is the best policy essay
- Online shopping essay
- Environment essay topics
- Prevention is better than cure essay
Get Free Listening Practice Samples
- Family excursions listening answers
- Public library listening answers
- Hiring a public room listening answers
- Notes on social programme listening answers
- Accommodation request form listening answers
- Transport survey listening answers
- Mic house agency repairs listening answers
- Holiday rentals listening answer
- Job enquiry listening answers
- Homestay application listening answers
- Library information listening answers
- Free activities in the burnham area listening answers
IELTS Important Information
- IELTS Exam Date
- IELTS Exam Fee
- IELTS Modules
- IELTS Speaking Practice Test
- IELTS Writing Practice Test
- IELTS Reading Practice Test
- IELTS Listening Practice Test
- IELTS Test Centres
- IELTS Results
- Types of IELTS
- IELTS Pattern
- IELTS Exam Eligibilty
- IELTS Slot Booking
- IELTS Band Score
- IELTS Registration
- IELTS Books
- IELTS Preparation
- IELTS Practice Test
- IELTS Speaking Cue Card
- IELTS Speaking Part 1
- IELTS Writing Task 1
- IELTS Writing Task 2
- Task 1 Pie Chart
- Task 1 Table Chart
- Task 1 Bar Graph
- Task 1 Line Graph
- Task 1 Diagram
- IELTS Computer Based Test
- IELTS Paper Based Test
- IELTS One Skill Retake
- IELTS for UKVI
- IELTS Vocabulary
IELTS Test Centre and Dates in India
- IELTS Test Centre and Dates in Hyderabad
- IELTS Test Centre and Dates in Bangalore
- IELTS Test Centre and Dates in Chennai
- IELTS Test Centre and Dates in Amritsar
- IELTS Centre and Dates in Ludhiana
- IELTS Test Centre and Dates in Mumbai
- IELTS Test Centres and Dates in Ahmedabad
- IELTS Centre and Dates in Delhi
- IELTS Test Centres and Dates in Chandigarh
- IELTS Center and Dates in Pune
IELTS Coaching
- IELTS coaching in Chandigarh
- IELTS coaching in Chennai
- IELTS coaching in Hyderabad
- IELTS coaching in Ahmedabad
- IELTS coaching in Dehradun
- IELTS coaching in Bangalore
- IELTS coaching in Jaipur
- IELTS coaching in Laxmi Nagar
- IELTS coaching in Coimbatore
- IELTS coaching in Trivandrum
- IELTS coaching in Gurgaon
![government and society essay Avatar photo](https://leapscholar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/cropped-cropped-avatar_user_5_1642680566.jpeg)
Manisha Angre
Experienced IELTS prep trainer and education management industry veteran. Specializes in public speaking, international education, market research, mentoring, and management.
![government and society essay personality vocabulary ielts](https://leapscholar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/shutterstock_1584036532-min.png)
Personality Vocabulary IELTS: About People & Personalities
![government and society essay ielts general academic](https://leapscholar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/shutterstock_314380244.jpg)
IELTS Academic or General: Which is the Easiest Test?
![government and society essay IELTS Connectors](https://leapscholar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/shutterstock_1906252684.png)
IELTS Connectors and Linking Words for 2024
![government and society essay cefr guide](https://leapscholar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/shutterstock_1888815964.png)
CEFR Levels In IELTS: 2024 Guide to CEFR Levels For Language Proficiency Tests
Love this blog share the love, boost your ielts writing score.
![government and society essay](https://leapscholar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/IELTS-Banner-Mobile-new-1.png)
Learn how to prepare for IELTS
- 2L+ Leap students sent abroad
- 2L+ students scored 7+ bands
Have Questions? Get Guidance to reach your Dream University
Connect with India's finest counsellors and biggest study abroad community.
Related Blogs
![government and society essay top film schools in the world](https://leapscholar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Screenshot-2024-08-22-121936.png)
Top Film Schools in the World for 2024-2025
- August 22, 2024
- 12 min read
![government and society essay MBA in International Business scope](https://leapscholar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/MBA-in-International-Business-1.png)
MBA in International Business scope
- 13 min read
![government and society essay Best Architecture Universities in the World](https://leapscholar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/best-Architecture.png)
Best Architecture Universities in the World: Ranking & Colleges
![government and society essay scholarships for MBA in Australia](https://leapscholar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/scholarships-for-MBA-in-Australia.png)
Scholarships for MBA in Australia for Indian Students in 2024-2025
![government and society essay education system in germany](https://leapscholar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/MA-in-English-in-Germany.png)
Education System in Germany for International Students
- August 21, 2024
![government and society essay study in france without ielts](https://leapscholar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/france-1.jpg)
Study in France without IELTS: Colleges & How to Study?
- 10 min read
Popular Blogs
![government and society essay msc microbiology in uk](https://leapscholar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/shutterstock_1687113799-min.png)
MSc in Microbiology in UK: Admission, Fees, Universities & Course Details
- May 2, 2022
- 17 Min Read
- 13 Min Read
![government and society essay government and society essay](https://leapscholar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/shutterstock_1735321544-min.png)
Top 5 Veterinary University in Canada: Eligibility & Admission Process
- April 4, 2022
![government and society essay pilot training in usa for indian students fees](https://leapscholar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/shutterstock_1956250504-min.png)
Flying School In The USA In 2024: Fees, Top Schools And More
- October 30, 2023
- 14 Min Read
![government and society essay how to get jobs in the UK](https://leapscholar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/shutterstock_1814754506.png)
How To Get Jobs In UK In 2024: Process, Eligibility & Visa
- February 8, 2022
![government and society essay](https://leapscholar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Base.png)
Crack IELTS with
7+ bands in 4 weeks.
![government and society essay](https://leapscholar.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Base-1.png)
Get Guidance to reach your
Dream university.
Home â Essay Samples â Social Issues â Discrimination â Essay On The Purpose Of Government
![government and society essay test_template](https://gradesfixer.com/wp-content/themes/essay/assets/img/1px.png)
Essay on The Purpose of Government
- Categories: Discrimination
About this sample
![government and society essay close](https://gradesfixer.com/wp-content/themes/essay/assets/img/close-banner.png)
Words: 629 |
Published: Mar 14, 2024
Words: 629 | Page: 1 | 4 min read
![government and society essay Image of Dr. Oliver Johnson](https://gradesfixer.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Vector-3-1.png)
Cite this Essay
Let us write you an essay from scratch
- 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
- Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours
Get high-quality help
![government and society essay author](https://gradesfixer.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/download-150x150.jpeg)
Verified writer
- Expert in: Social Issues
![government and society essay writer](https://gradesfixer.com/wp-content/themes/essay/assets/img/2022/07/wr-6-150x150.jpg)
+ 120 experts online
By clicking âCheck Writersâ Offersâ, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . Weâll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
Related Essays
1 pages / 617 words
1 pages / 438 words
4 pages / 1673 words
1 pages / 1138 words
Remember! This is just a sample.
You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.
121 writers online
Still canât find what you need?
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled
Related Essays on Discrimination
Langston Hughes, often hailed as a leading figure of the Harlem Renaissance, made significant contributions to American literature and culture through his poetry, essays, and plays. His works captured the African American [...]
In the graphic novel They Called Us Enemy, George Takei shares his personal account of the injustices faced by Japanese Americans during World War II. The title and cover art of the book vividly depict the struggles and [...]
Colorism, a form of discrimination based on skin color, has a long and complex history that can be traced back to ancient civilizations. Throughout the years, colorism has evolved and taken different forms, impacting [...]
Colorism has pervasive effects on individuals in various spheres of life, including educational institutions and workplaces. Research has shown that individuals with darker skin tones often face biases and prejudices in these [...]
Have you ever noticed how conflict often precedes significant change in our personal lives, communities, and even on a global scale? From political revolutions to personal growth, conflict seems to be a necessary catalyst for [...]
The Roaring 20s was a time of unprecedented social change, cultural upheaval, and technological advancements. It was an era defined by jazz music, flapper fashion, and the rise of aviation. One of the most iconic figures of this [...]
Related Topics
By clicking âSendâ, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.
Where do you want us to send this sample?
By clicking âContinueâ, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.
Be careful. This essay is not unique
This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before
Download this Sample
Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts
Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.
Please check your inbox.
We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!
Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!
We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing weâll assume you board with our cookie policy .
- Instructions Followed To The Letter
- Deadlines Met At Every Stage
- Unique And Plagiarism Free
Top Streams
- Data Science Courses in USA
- Business Analytics Courses in USA
- Engineering Courses in USA
- Tax Courses in USA
- Healthcare Courses in USA
- Language Courses in USA
- Insurance Courses in USA
- Digital Marketing Courses in USA
Top Specialization
- Masters in Data Analytics in USA
- Masters in Mechanical Engineering in USA
- Masters in Supply Chain Management in USA
- Masters in Computer Science in USA
- MBA in Finance in USA
- Masters in Architecture in USA
Top Universities
- Cornell University
- Yale University
- Princeton University
- University of California Los Angeles
- University of Harvard
- Stanford University
- Arizona State University
- Northeastern University
- Scholarships to Study in USA
- Project Management Courses in Australia
- Accounting Courses in Australia
- Medical Courses in Australia
- Psychology Courses in Australia
- Interior Designing Courses in Australia
- Pharmacy Courses in Australia
- Social Work Courses in Australia
- MBA in Australia
- Masters in Education in Australia
- Masters in Pharmacy in Australia
- Masters in Information Technology in Australia
- BBA in Australia
- Masters in Teaching in Australia
- Masters in Psychology in Australia
- University of Melbourne
- Deakin University
- Carnegie Mellon University
- Monash University
- University of Sydney
- University of Queensland
- RMIT University
- Macquarie University
- PR Courses in Australia
- SOP for Australia Student Visa
- Data Science Courses in Canada
- Business Management Courses in Canada
- Supply Chain Management Courses in Canada
- Project Management Courses in Canada
- Business Analytics Courses in Canada
- Hotel Management Courses in Canada
- MBA in Canada
- MS in Canada
- Masters in Computer Science in Canada
- Masters in Management in Canada
- Masters in Psychology in Canada
- Masters in Education in Canada
- MBA in Finance in Canada
- Masters in Business Analytics in Canada
- University of Toronto
- University of British Columbia
- McGill University
- University of Alberta
- York University
- University of Calgary
- Algoma University
- University Canada West
- IELTS requirement for Canada Student Visa
- Canada Visa Interview
- Top cities in Canada for International Students
- Project Management Courses in UK
- Data Science Courses in UK
- Public Health Courses in UK
- Digital Marketing Courses in UK
- Hotel Management Courses in UK
- Nursing Courses in UK
- Medicine Courses in UK
- Interior Designing Courses in UK
- Masters in Computer Science in UK
- Masters in Psychology in UK
- MBA in Finance in UK
- MBA in Healthcare Management in UK
- Masters in Education in UK
- Masters in Marketing in UK
- MBA in HR in UK
- University of Oxford
- University of Cambridge
- Coventry University
- University of East London
- University of Hertfordshire
- University of Birmingham
- Imperial College London
- University of Glasgow
Top Resources
- Universities in Germany
- Study in Germany
- Masters in Germany
- Courses in Germany
- Bachelors in Germany
- Germany Job Seeker Visa
- Cost of Living in Germany
- Best Universities in Germany
Top Courses
- Masters in Data Science in Germany
- MS in Computer Science in Germany
- Marine Engineering in Germany
- MS Courses in Germany
- Masters in Psychology in Germany
- Hotel Management Courses in Germany
- Masters in Economics in Germany
- Paramedical Courses in Germany
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
- University of Bonn
- University of Freiburg
- University of Hamburg
- University of Stuttgart
- Saarland University
- Mannheim University
- MBA in Ireland
- Phd in Ireland
- Masters in Computer Science Ireland
- Cyber Security in Ireland
- Masters in Data Analytics Ireland
- Ms in Data Science in Ireland
- Pharmacy courses in ireland
- Business Analytics Course in Ireland
- Universities in Ireland
- Study in Ireland
- Masters in Ireland
- Courses in Ireland
- Bachelors in Ireland
- Cost of Living in Ireland
- Ireland Student Visa
- Part Time Jobs in Ireland
- Trinity College Dublin
- University College Dublin
- Dublin City University
- University of Limerick
- Dublin Business School
- Maynooth University
- University College Cork
- National College of Ireland
Colleges & Courses
- Masters in France
- Phd in France
- Study Medicine in France
- Best Universities in Frankfurt
- Best Architecture Colleges in France
- ESIGELEC France
- Study in France for Indian Students
- Intakes in France
- SOP for France Visa
- Study in France from India
- Reasons to Study in France
- How to Settle in France
More About France
- Cost of Living in France
- France Study Visa
- Cost of Living in Frankfurt
- France Scholarship for Indian Students
- Part Time Jobs in France
- Stay Back in France After Masters
About Finland
- Universities in Finland
- Study in Finland
- Courses in Finland
- Bachelor Courses in Finland
- Masters Courses in Finland
- Cost of Living in Finland
- MS in Finland
- Average Fees in Finland Universities
- PhD in Finland
- Jobs in Finland
- Bachelor Degree in Medicine & Surgery
- MBBS Courses in Georgia
- MBBS Courses in Russia
- Alte University
- Caucasus University
- Georgian National University SEU
- David Tvildiani Medical University
- Caspian International School Of Medicine
- Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University
- Kyrgyz State Medical Academy
- Cremeia Federal University
- Bashkir State Medical University
- Kursk State Medical University
- Andijan State Medical Institute
- IELTS Syllabus
- IELTS Prepration
- IELTS Eligibility
- IELTS Test Format
- IELTS Band Descriptors
- IELTS Speaking test
- IELTS Writing Task 1
- IELTS score validity
- IELTS Cue Card
IELTS Reading Answers Sample
- Animal Camouflage
- Types Of Societies
- Australia Convict Colonies
- A Spark A Flint
- Emigration To The Us
- The History Of Salt
- Zoo Conservation Programmes
- The Robots Are Coming
- The Development Of Plastic
IELTS Speaking Cue Card Sample
- Describe A Puzzle You Have Played
- Describe A Long Walk You Ever Had
- Describe Your Favourite Movie
- Describe A Difficult Thing You did
- Describe A Businessman You Admire
- Memorable Day in My Life
- Describe Your Dream House
- Describe A Bag You Want to Own
- Describe a Famous Athlete You Know
- Aquatic Animal
IELTS Essay Sample Sample
- Best Education System
- IELTS Opinion Essay
- Agree or Disagree Essay
- Problem Solution Essays
- Essay on Space Exploration
- Essay On Historical Places
- Essay Writing Samples
- Tourism Essay
- Global Warming Essay
- GRE Exam Fees
- GRE Exam Syllabus
- GRE Exam Eligibility
- Sections in GRE Exam
- GRE Exam Benefits
- GRE Exam Results
- GRE Cutoff for US Universities
- GRE Preparation
- Send GRE scores to Universities
GRE Exam Study Material
- GRE Verbal Preparation
- GRE Study Material
- GRE AWA Essays
- GRE Sample Issue Essays
- Stanford University GRE Cutoff
- Harvard University GRE Cutoff
- GRE Quantitative Reasoning
- GRE Verbal Reasoning
- GRE Reading Comprehension
- Prepare for GRE in 2 months
Other Resources
- Documents Required For Gre Exam
- GRE Exam Duration
- GRE at Home
- GRE vs GMAT
- Improve GRE Verbal Scores
Free GRE Ebooks
- GRE Preparation Guide (Free PDF)
- GRE Syllabus (Free PDF)
- GMAT Eligibility
- GMAT Syllabus
- GMAT Exam Dates
- GMAT Registration
- GMAT Exam Fees
- GMAT Sections
- GMAT Purpose
GMAT Exam Study Material
- How to prepare for GMAT?
- GMAT Score Validity
- GMAT Preparation Books
- GMAT Preparation
- GMAT Exam Duration
- GMAT Score for Harvard
- GMAT Reading Comprehension
- GMAT Retake Strategy
Free GMAT Ebooks
- GMAT Guide PDF
- Download GMAT Syllabus PDF
- TOEFL Exam Registration
- TOEFL Exam Eligibility
- TOEFL Exam Pattern
- TOEFL Exam Preparation
- TOEFL Exam Tips
- TOEFL Exam Dates
- Documents for TOEFL Exam
- TOEFL Exam Fee
TOEFL Exam Study Material
- TOEFL Preparation Books
- TOEFL Speaking Section
- TOEFL Score and Results
- TOEFL Writing Section
- TOEFL Reading Section
- TOEFL Listening Section
- TOEFL Vocabulary
- Types of Essays in TOEFL
Free TOEFL Ebooks
- TOEFL Exam Guide (Free PDF)
- PTE Exam Dates
- PTE Exam Syllabus
- PTE Exam Eligibility Criteria
- PTE Test Centers in India
- PTE Exam Pattern
- PTE Exam Fees
- PTE Exam Duration
- PTE Exam Registration
PTE Exam Study Material
- PTE Exam Preparation
- PTE Speaking Test
- PTE Reading Test
- PTE Listening Test
- PTE Writing Test
- PTE Essay Writing
- PTE exam for Australia
Free PTE Ebooks
- PTE Syllabus (Free PDF)
- Duolingo Exam
- Duolingo Test Eligibility
- Duolingo Exam Pattern
- Duolingo Exam Fees
- Duolingo Test Validity
- Duolingo Syllabus
- Duolingo Preparation
Duolingo Exam Study Material
- Duolingo Exam Dates
- Duolingo Test Score
- Duolingo Test Results
- Duolingo Test Booking
Free Duolingo Ebooks
- Duolingo Guide (Free PDF)
- Duolingo Test Pattern (Free PDF)
NEET & MCAT Exam
- NEET Study Material
- NEET Preparation
- MCAT Eligibility
- MCAT Preparation
SAT & ACT Exam
- ACT Eligibility
- ACT Exam Dates
- SAT Syllabus
- SAT Exam Pattern
- SAT Exam Eligibility
USMLE & OET Exam
- USMLE Syllabus
- USMLE Preparation
- USMLE Step 1
- OET Syllabus
- OET Eligibility
- OET Prepration
PLAB & LSAT Exam
- PLAB Exam Syllabus
- PLAB Exam Fees
- LSAT Eligibility
- LSAT Registration
- PLAB Accepted Countries
- TOEIC Result
- Study Guide
Application Process
- LOR for Masters
- SOP Samples for MS
- LOR for Phd
- SOP for Internship
- SOP for Phd
- Check Visa Status
- Motivation Letter Format
- Motivation Letter for Internship
- F1 Visa Documents Checklist
Career Prospects
- Popular Courses after Bcom in Abroad
- Part Time Jobs in Australia
- Part Time Jobs in USA
- Salary after MS in Germany
- Salary after MBA in Canada
- Average Salary in Singapore
- Higher Studies after MBA in Abroad
- Study in Canada after 12th
- Most Demanding Engineering Fields
Trending Topics
- Best Education System in World
- Best Flying Schools in World
- Top Free Education Countries
- Best Countries to Migrate from India
- 1 Year PG Diploma Courses in Canada
- Germany Post Study Work Visa
- Post Study Visa in USA
- Packing List for Indian Students
- Data Science Vs Data Analytics
- Public Vs Private Universities in Germany
- Universities Vs Colleges
- Difference Between GPA and CGPA
- Undergraduate Vs Graduate
- MBA in UK Vs MBA in USA
- Degree Vs Diploma in Canada
- IELTS vs TOEFL
- Duolingo English Test vs. IELTS
- Canada Vs India
- Why Study in Canada
- Cost of Living in Canada
- Education System in Canada
- SOP for Canada
- Summer Intake in Canada
- Spring Intake in Canada
- Winter Intake in Canada
- Accommodation in Canada for Students
- Average Salary in Canada
- Fully Funded Scholarships in Canada
- Why Study in USA
- Cost of Studying in USA
- Spring Intake in USA
- Winter Intake in USA
- Summer Intake in USA
- STEM Courses in USA
- Scholarships for MS in USA
- Acceptable Study Gap in USA
- Interesting Facts about USA
- Free USA course
- Why Study in UK
- Cost of Living in UK
- Cost of Studying in UK
- Education System in UK
- Summer Intake in UK
- Spring Intake in UK
- Student Visa for UK
- Accommodation in UK for Students
- Scholarships in UK
- Why Study in Germany
- Cost of Studying in Germany
- Education System in Germany
- SOP for Germany
- Summer Intake in Germany
- Winter Intake in Germany
- Study Visa for Germany
- Accommodation in Germany for Students
- Free Education in Germany
Country Guides
- Study in UK
- Study in Canada
- Study in USA
- Study in Australia
- SOP Samples for Canada Student Visa
- US F1 Visa Guide for Aspirants
Exams Guides
- Duolingo Test Pattern
Recommended Reads
- Fully Funded Masters Guide
- SOP Samples For Australia
- Scholarships for Canada
- Data Science Guide
- SOP for MS in Computer Science
- Study Abroad Exams
- Alumni Connect
- Booster Program
- Scholarship
GPA CALCULATOR Convert percentage marks to GPA effortlessly with our calculator!
Expense calculator plan your study abroad expenses with our comprehensive calculator, ielts band calculator estimate your ielts band score with our accurate calculator, education loan calculator discover your eligible loan amount limit with our education calculator, university partner explore growth and opportunities with our university partnership, accommodation discover your perfect study abroad accommodation here, experience-center discover our offline centers for a personalized experience, our offices visit us for expert study abroad counseling..
- 18002102030
- Study Abroad
Government and Society IELTS Essay: Samples
- IELTS Preparation
- IELTS E-Books
- IELTS Registration
- IELTS Exam Fee
- IELTS Exam Dates 2024
- Documents Required
- IELTS Test Centers
- Test Format
- Band Descriptors
- IELTS Speaking Test
- General Reading Test
- General Writing Task
- IELTS Coaching
- Types of Essays
- IELTS for Australia
- IELTS Results
- Generation Gap Essay
- GPA Calculator
- Study Abroad Consultant In India
- Study Visa Consultants in India
Updated on 27 June, 2023
![Mrinal Mandal Mrinal Mandal](https://ik.imagekit.io/upgrad1/abroad-images/home/images/author-image.png?tr=w-52,q-70)
Mrinal Mandal
Study abroad expert.
![Mrinal Mandal Mrinal Mandal](https://ik.imagekit.io/upgrad1/abroad-images/home/images/author-image.png?tr=w-24,q-70)
Essay writing is a part of IELTS Writing Task 2 . Environment, health, culture, education, society, communication, and sports are recurrent themes for the question.
The article contains Government and Society IELTS essay samples that you can check to better understand the tone and style needed. Make sure you write carefully and within a maximum of 40 minutes. The minimum word count is 250 words for the essay. This is one of the topics that have reappeared in the IELTS test years after years.
Table of Contents
Government and society ielts essay samples: .
Question- Some people believe that only the government can bring about significant societal changes. At the same time, others believe that an individual too can bring about a big difference in society. What do you think of the above statement?
It is often argued that the leadership and authority of any country should have absolute and supreme powers in its hands for changing society positively and ridding it of all its negatives. Yet, I believe that this view is intrinsically flawed since, without every individual or citizenâs cooperation, there is not a lot that the government may do for improving society.
The government may create stronger policies and tap into available resources for their implementation. However, these policies only lead to suitable results when implemented by all society members and stakeholders. If a policy has been introduced, but no one follows the same, then the primary goal will never be accomplished as a result.
For example, in recent times, many nations have unveiled policies that are in sync to ensure lower carbon-related emissions by the next four to five years. Yet, people living in these nations often adopt carefree and reckless perspectives without abiding by the guidelines and policies for combating climate change which is already showing its devastating effects in various parts of the world. Hence, without the cooperation of people, positive results are impossible to achieve for any government.
At the same time, the government often emphasizes pushing for macro (throughout the country) results. In contrast, individual efforts and initiatives are only applicable at a micro-level and may instantly improve societal improvement. The ruling government and party cannot instantly be aware of all the societal problems surrounding them in diverse regions. However, the local communities and people will always be aware of such problems.
Hence, individuals have higher power for ensuring instant changes in their neighbourhoods and communities with the support of government-mobilized resources on a bigger scale.
For example, suppose there is a natural calamity, and the government immediately announces its response in terms of disaster relief. The initiative will be more productive and fruitful when local people cooperate and help with relief and rescue activities instead of only leaving it for the forces and authorities.
To conclude, I feel that individual citizens can usher in more instant and lasting societal changes when they cooperate and work with the government. (360 words)
Important Resources to Read About IELTS:
Download E-Books for IELTS Preparation
![government and society essay IELTS IDIOMS GUIDE](https://ik.imagekit.io/upgrad1/abroad-images/sliderImageOnly/images/IELTS_Common_idioms_1_HV7G8Y.jpg?tr=f-jpg,pr-true)
Question- Some people think that only the government can make significant societal changes .
Individuals often assume that just the government holds sufficient power for driving societal changes. I do not agree with this perception. While I do state that the government only can create policies with an intention towards societal development, without proper cooperation and participation of all citizens, the policies will not be able to accomplish a lot of things or their intended objectives.
There are many powers of the government. For instance, the government may legislate and develop new laws and policies for progressively aligning the society of the time. Yet, if people stop cooperating with the authorities, no policy will ever lead to a proper result.
Our country has many social practices that should be stopped. There is a practice still followed surreptitiously in the many Indian States of female foeticide or killing girl children in the womb. The government has always stringently emphasized the need to abide by laws and regulations to combat the practice. Both the people are doing this, and doctors are helping them face severe legal action and punishments. Yet, the practice continues unabated in several areas, with many people finding loopholes to get around the laws prevailing on the subject. There are strict laws against poaching and encouraging wildlife conservation. However, the wildlife population is still waning since criminal elements keep killing animals and poaching them. The government bans Single-use plastic bags, but people still use them for various purposes. This shows that governments cannot track every person individually in society. It requires cooperation from the public to make any reform or policy successful.
At the same time, people also have their limitations. Many individuals remain concerned about societal progress and welfare. They often hope that the government can frame laws to help these initiatives succeed. Many people work to better the less-privileged and poor citizens of the country. Many wage war against harmful practices to save the environment. They require governmental support for carrying out such noble and welfare-oriented activities. Individuals cannot frame their regulations, but they get some support in their activities if the government comes up with the same. At the same time, impractical or wrong policy-making of the government also leads to such good work being crippled at times, taking society a step backward.
In conclusion, I would say that both individuals and the government should cooperate and work together to stimulate progress. The government should refrain from wrong policies that hinder progress, and people should cooperate to make good policies successfully usher in social reform. (471 words)
Read More About IELTS:
Important Exams
Important resources for ielts, free study abroad counselling, refer your friend & earn upto âč15000.
Help your friend upgrade to a Global Career and earn rewards together.
TRENDING SEARCHES
Ielts sample essay, ielts reading answer.
- Paragraph On Digital India
- Honesty is the Best Policy Essay
- Nowadays Many People Choose To Be Self Employed
- Letter Email Telephone Are Example Of Communication Channels
- Understand the Most Important Characteristics of a Society
- Famous Brands Of Clothes
- Telecommuting Has Many Advantages And the Following Drawbacks
- How To Face Problems In Life
- Write About Your Family
- Disadvantages of A Nuclear Family
- Social Media Advantages and Disadvantages Essay
- Advantages of Plastic Containers
- Life in A Big City Paragraph
- Essay On Generation Gap
- What Gets Sharper The More You Use It
- Essay on Coronavirus 150 Words
- Difference Between Online And Offline Classes
- Theme Of The Poem The Road Not Taken
- Learning is A Continuous Process
- Young People Are Often Influenced By Their Peers
- Describe A Good Law In Your Country
- Describe a Perfect Job You Would Like To Have in the Future
- Describe a leisure activity in or on the sea
- Describe A Toy You Liked in Your Childhood
- Describe a tall building in your city
- Describe A Computer/Phone Game You Enjoy Playing Since Your Childhood
- Describe An Ambition that You haven?t Achieved
- Describe A Quiet Place You Like To Spend Time In
- Describe A Tradition in your Country
- Describe an exciting book that you enjoy reading
- Describe a city that you think is very interesting
- Describe A Time When You Were Really Close To A Wild Animal
- Describe a time when you needed to use your imagination
- GMAT subjects
- PTE Pattern
- SAT Exam Syllabus
- ACt Exam Syllabus
- GRE Eligibility
- GRE test Centers
- USMLE full form
- Duolingo exam pattern
- GRE Waiver Universities in USA
- TOEFL Full Form
- What is ACT Exam?
- MBA in UK without Gmat
- MBA in Germany without GMAT
- GRE Exam fee in India
- Alternative Medicine In Australia
- What Do Whales Feel
- Why Some Women Cross The Finish Line Ahead Of Men
- The Impact Of Wilderness Tourism Ielts Reading Answers
- The Concept Of Role Theory Reading Answers
- The Intersection Of Health Sciences And Geography
- Gifted Children And Learning
- New Agriculture In Oregon Us
- When Evolution Runs Backwards Ielts
- How To Spot A Liar
- Micro Enterprise Credit For Street Youth Reading Answers
- The Need To Belong
- Striking Back At Lightning With Lasers Ielts
- The Context Meaning And Scope Of Tourism
- A Spark A Flint Ielts Reading Answers
- The Life And Work Of Marie Curie
- Sheet Glass Manufacture: The Float Process
- Flawed Beauty The Problem With Toughened Glass
- A Song On The Brain
- Making Every Drop Count
The above tips are the Author's experiences. upGrad does not guarantee scores or admissions.
Call us to clear your doubts at:
- Grievance Redressal
- Terms of Use
- Privacy Policy
- Report a Vulnerability
- University Partner
- Accommodation
- IELTS Band Calculator
- Download Study Abroad App
- Education Loan Calculator
- upGrad Abroad Office
- Expense Calculator
- Knowledge Base
- Business Partner
Top Destinations
Masters programs.
- MBA in Germany, IU
- MIM in Germany, IU
- MS in CS in Germany, IU
- MS in Data Analytics in USA, Clark University
- MS in Project Management in USA, Clark University
- MS in IT in USA, Clark University
- MS in Data Analytics & Visualization in USA, Yeshiva University
- MS in Artificial Intelligence in USA, Yeshiva University
- MS in Cybersecurity, Yeshiva University
![](http://rss3.fun/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
Study Abroad Important Blogs
- Cost of Study:
- Cost of Studying in Canada
- Cost of Studying in Ireland
- Cost of Studying in Australia
- Cost of living:
- Cost of living in UK
- Cost of living in Australia
- Cost of living in Germany
- Cost of living in Ireland
- Cost of living in Canada
- Cost of Living in Singapore
- Cost of Living in Netherlands
- Career Opportunities:
- Career Opportunities in Australia
- Career Opportunities in Germany
- Job Opportunities in After MS in Canada
- Job Opportunities After MBA in Australia
- Job Opportunities After MS in UK
- IELTS Exam Resources:
- Academic IELTS
- IELTS Band Score
- IELTS Writing Task 2
- IELTS Slot Booking
- IELTS Band Score Chart
- IELTS Score for UK
- IELTS Score for USA
- Validity of IELTS Score
- IELTS Speaking Topics
- IELTS Reading Tips
- How to Prepare for IELTS at Home Without Coaching
- IELTS Preparation Books
- Types of IELTS Exam
- IELTS Academic vs General
- IELTS Exam Pattern
- IELTS Essay
- IELTS Exam Dates
- Top Streams:
- Fashion Designing Courses in Australia
- Accounting Courses in Canada
- Management Courses in Canada
![government and society essay Logo](https://i0.wp.com/aspiringyouths.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Logo.png?fit=480%2C90&ssl=1)
Essay on Government
Students are often asked to write an essay on Government in their schools and colleges. And if youâre also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.
Letâs take a lookâŠ
100 Words Essay on Government
What is government.
Government is a group of people who make decisions and laws for a country. They are responsible for providing services like education, healthcare, and security to the public.
Types of Government
There are different types of governments, such as democracy, monarchy, dictatorship, and communism. In a democracy, people choose their leaders through voting.
Roles of Government
Governments have many roles. They protect citizens, make laws, and manage the economy. They also provide public services like schools and hospitals.
Importance of Government
Government is important because it maintains order, protects citizens, and provides necessary services. Without it, society would be chaotic.
250 Words Essay on Government
Introduction.
The term âGovernmentâ fundamentally signifies the governing body of a nation or state that exercises authority, controls, and administers public policy. It is the political direction and control exercised over the actions of the members, citizens, or inhabitants of communities, societies, and states.
The Role of Government
The government plays a crucial role in society by ensuring the smooth functioning of the nation. It is responsible for maintaining law and order, protecting citizensâ rights, and providing public services. The government also shapes the economy by implementing policies that either stimulate or slow down economic growth.
Governments can be categorized into several types based on their structure and the extent of power they exercise. These include democracy, where power is vested in the people; monarchy, where power is held by a single ruler; and autocracy, where a single person holds unlimited power.
Government and Democracy
In democratic governments, citizens have the right to elect their representatives who make decisions on their behalf. This system promotes accountability, transparency, and the protection of individual rights. However, democracyâs success hinges on an informed and active citizenry that can hold the government accountable.
In conclusion, the government is a fundamental institution in any society. It plays a pivotal role in maintaining societal order, ensuring the welfare of its citizens, and driving the nationâs growth and development. The efficiency of a government is largely determined by its structure, the extent of its powers, and the level of citizen participation.
500 Words Essay on Government
Introduction to government.
The governmentâs primary role is to safeguard the rights and freedoms of its citizens. This involves ensuring the security of the people, maintaining law and order, and providing public goods and services. A government has the responsibility to protect its citizens from internal and external threats, which is why it maintains law enforcement agencies and a military.
The government also plays a crucial role in economic regulation and stabilization. By controlling monetary and fiscal policies, it can influence the countryâs economic trajectory, ensuring growth, stability, and equity. Furthermore, the government is responsible for the provision of public goods and services such as education, healthcare, infrastructure, and social welfare programs.
Forms of Government
In between these extremes, there are numerous variations, such as constitutional monarchies, where a monarch shares power with a constitutionally organized government, or oligarchies, where power rests with a small number of people.
The Importance of Good Governance
Good governance is integral to the effective functioning of a government. It is characterized by transparency, accountability, efficiency, and adherence to the rule of law. Good governance ensures that the governmentâs actions benefit the majority of the population and that public resources are used efficiently and ethically.
Conclusion: The Evolving Role of Government
In todayâs rapidly changing world, the role of government is evolving. With the advent of technology and globalization, governments are not just confined to traditional roles but are increasingly involved in areas such as digital infrastructure, climate change, and global health crises.
As we move forward, the challenge for governments worldwide will be to adapt to these changes and continue to serve their citizens effectively. Understanding the nature, role, and complexities of government is crucial for us as we navigate the political landscape of the 21st century.
Thatâs it! I hope the essay helped you.
If youâre looking for more, here are essays on other interesting topics:
Happy studying!
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Introductory essay
Written by the educators who created Cyber-Influence and Power, a brief look at the key facts, tough questions and big ideas in their field. Begin this TED Study with a fascinating read that gives context and clarity to the material.
Each and every one of us has a vital part to play in building the kind of world in which government and technology serve the worldâs people and not the other way around. Rebecca MacKinnon
Over the past 20 years, information and communication technologies (ICTs) have transformed the globe, facilitating the international economic, political, and cultural connections and exchanges that are at the heart of contemporary globalization processes. The term ICT is broad in scope, encompassing both the technological infrastructure and products that facilitate the collection, storage, manipulation, and distribution of information in a variety of formats.
While there are many definitions of globalization, most would agree that the term refers to a variety of complex social processes that facilitate worldwide economic, cultural, and political connections and exchanges. The kinds of global connections ICTs give rise to mark a dramatic departure from the face-to-face, time and place dependent interactions that characterized communication throughout most of human history. ICTs have extended human interaction and increased our interconnectedness, making it possible for geographically dispersed people not only to share information at an ever-faster rate but also to organize and to take action in response to events occurring in places far from where they are physically situated.
While these complex webs of connections can facilitate positive collective action, they can also put us at risk. As TED speaker Ian Goldin observes, the complexity of our global connections creates a built-in fragility: What happens in one part of the world can very quickly affect everyone, everywhere.
The proliferation of ICTs and the new webs of social connections they engender have had profound political implications for governments, citizens, and non-state actors alike. Each of the TEDTalks featured in this course explore some of these implications, highlighting the connections and tensions between technology and politics. Some speakers focus primarily on how anti-authoritarian protesters use technology to convene and organize supporters, while others expose how authoritarian governments use technology to manipulate and control individuals and groups. When viewed together as a unit, the contrasting voices reveal that technology is a contested site through which political power is both exercised and resisted.
Technology as liberator
The liberating potential of technology is a powerful theme taken up by several TED speakers in Cyber-Influence and Power . Journalist and Global Voices co-founder Rebecca MacKinnon, for example, begins her talk by playing the famous Orwell-inspired Apple advertisement from 1984. Apple created the ad to introduce Macintosh computers, but MacKinnon describes Apple's underlying narrative as follows: "technology created by innovative companies will set us all free." While MacKinnon examines this narrative with a critical eye, other TED speakers focus on the ways that ICTs can and do function positively as tools of social change, enabling citizens to challenge oppressive governments.
In a 2011 CNN interview, Egyptian protest leader, Google executive, and TED speaker Wael Ghonim claimed "if you want to free a society, just give them internet access. The young crowds are going to all go out and see and hear the unbiased media, see the truth about other nations and their own nation, and they are going to be able to communicate and collaborate together." (i). In this framework, the opportunities for global information sharing, borderless communication, and collaboration that ICTs make possible encourage the spread of democracy. As Ghonim argues, when citizens go online, they are likely to discover that their particular government's perspective is only one among many. Activists like Ghonim maintain that exposure to this online free exchange of ideas will make people less likely to accept government propaganda and more likely to challenge oppressive regimes.
A case in point is the controversy that erupted around Khaled Said, a young Egyptian man who died after being arrested by Egyptian police. The police claimed that Said suffocated when he attempted to swallow a bag of hashish; witnesses, however, reported that he was beaten to death by the police. Stories about the beating and photos of Said's disfigured body circulated widely in online communities, and Ghonim's Facebook group, titled "We are all Khaled Said," is widely credited with bringing attention to Said's death and fomenting the discontent that ultimately erupted in the 2011 Egyptian Revolution, or what Ghonim refers to as "revolution 2.0."
Ghonim's Facebook group also illustrates how ICTs enable citizens to produce and broadcast information themselves. Many people already take for granted the ability to capture images and video via handheld devices and then upload that footage to platforms like YouTube. As TED speaker Clay Shirky points out, our ability to produce and widely distribute information constitutes a revolutionary change in media production and consumption patterns. The production of media has typically been very expensive and thus out of reach for most individuals; the average person was therefore primarily a consumer of media, reading books, listening to the radio, watching TV, going to movies, etc. Very few could independently publish their own books or create and distribute their own radio programs, television shows, or movies. ICTs have disrupted this configuration, putting media production in the hands of individual amateurs on a budget â or what Shirky refers to as members of "the former audience" â alongside the professionals backed by multi-billion dollar corporations. This "democratization of media" allows individuals to create massive amounts of information in a variety of formats and to distribute it almost instantly to a potentially global audience.
Shirky is especially interested in the Internet as "the first medium in history that has native support for groups and conversations at the same time." This shift has important political implications. For example, in 2008 many Obama followers used Obama's own social networking site to express their unhappiness when the presidential candidate changed his position on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The outcry of his supporters did not force Obama to revert to his original position, but it did help him realize that he needed to address his supporters directly, acknowledging their disagreement on the issue and explaining his position. Shirky observes that this scenario was also notable because the Obama organization realized that "their role was to convene their supporters but not to control their supporters." This tension between the use of technology in the service of the democratic impulse to convene citizens vs. the authoritarian impulse to control them runs throughout many of the TEDTalks in Cyber-Influence and Power.
A number of TED speakers explicitly examine the ways that ICTs give individual citizens the ability to document governmental abuses they witness and to upload this information to the Internet for a global audience. Thus, ICTs can empower citizens by giving them tools that can help keep their governments accountable. The former head of Al Jazeera and TED speaker Wadah Khanfar provides some very clear examples of the political power of technology in the hands of citizens. He describes how the revolution in Tunisia was delivered to the world via cell phones, cameras, and social media outlets, with the mainstream media relying on "citizen reporters" for details.
Former British prime minister Gordon Brown's TEDTalk also highlights some of the ways citizens have used ICTs to keep their governments accountable. For example, Brown recounts how citizens in Zimbabwe used the cameras on their phones at polling places in order to discourage the Mugabe regime from engaging in electoral fraud. Similarly, Clay Shirky begins his TEDTalk with a discussion of how cameras on phones were used to combat voter suppression in the 2008 presidential election in the U.S. ICTs allowed citizens to be protectors of the democratic process, casting their individual votes but also, as Shirky observes, helping to "ensure the sanctity of the vote overall."
Technology as oppressor
While smart phones and social networking sites like Twitter and Facebook have arguably facilitated the overthrow of dictatorships in places like Tunisia and Egypt, lending credence to Gordon Brown's vision of technology as an engine of liberalism and pluralism, not everyone shares this view. As TED speaker and former religious extremist Maajid Nawaz points out, there is nothing inherently liberating about ICTs, given that they frequently are deployed to great effect by extremist organizations seeking social changes that are often inconsistent with democracy and human rights. Where once individual extremists might have felt isolated and alone, disconnected from like-minded people and thus unable to act in concert with others to pursue their agendas, ICTs allow them to connect with other extremists and to form communities around their ideas, narratives, and symbols.
Ian Goldin shares this concern, warning listeners about what he calls the "two Achilles heels of globalization": growing inequality and the fragility that is inherent in a complex integrated system. He points out that those who do not experience the benefits of globalization, who feel like they've been left out in one way or another, can potentially become incredibly dangerous. In a world where what happens in one place very quickly affects everyone else â and where technologies are getting ever smaller and more powerful â a single angry individual with access to technological resources has the potential to do more damage than ever before. The question becomes then, how do we manage the systemic risk inherent in today's technology-infused globalized world? According to Goldin, our current governance structures are "fossilized" and ill-equipped to deal with these issues.
Other critics of the notion that ICTs are inherently liberating point out that ICTs have been leveraged effectively by oppressive governments to solidify their own power and to manipulate, spy upon, and censor their citizens. Journalist and TED speaker Evgeny Morozov expresses scepticism about what he calls "iPod liberalism," or the belief that technology will necessarily lead to the fall of dictatorships and the emergence of democratic governments. Morozov uses the term "spinternet" to describe authoritarian governments' use of the Internet to provide their own "spin" on issues and events. Russia, China, and Iran, he argues, have all trained and paid bloggers to promote their ideological agendas in the online environment and/or or to attack people writing posts the government doesn't like in an effort to discredit them as spies or criminals who should not be trusted.
Morozov also points out that social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter are tools not only of revolutionaries but also of authoritarian governments who use them to gather open-source intelligence. "In the past," Morozov maintains, "it would take you weeks, if not months, to identify how Iranian activists connect to each other. Now you know how they connect to each other by looking at their Facebook page. KGB...used to torture in order to get this data." Instead of focusing primarily on bringing Internet access and devices to the people in countries ruled by authoritarian regimes, Morozov argues that we need to abandon our cyber-utopian assumptions and do more to actually empower intellectuals, dissidents, NGOs and other members of society, making sure that the "spinternet" does not prevent their voices from being heard.
The ICT Empowered Individual vs. The Nation State
In her TEDTalk "Let's Take Back the Internet," Rebecca MacKinnon argues that "the only legitimate purpose of government is to serve citizens, andâŠthe only legitimate purpose of technology is to improve our lives, not to manipulate or enslave us." It is clearly not a given, however, that governments, organizations, and individuals will use technology benevolently. Part of the responsibility of citizenship in the globalized information age then is to work to ensure that both governments and technologies "serve the world's peoples." However, there is considerable disagreement about what that might look like.
WikiLeaks spokesperson and TED speaker Julian Assange, for example, argues that government secrecy is inconsistent with democratic values and is ultimately about deceiving and manipulating rather than serving the world's people. Others maintain that governments need to be able to keep secrets about some topics in order to protect their citizens or to act effectively in response to crises, oppressive regimes, terrorist organizations, etc. While some view Assange's use of technology as a way to hold governments accountable and to increase transparency, others see this use of technology as a criminal act with the potential to both undermine stable democracies and put innocent lives in danger.
ICTs and global citizenship
While there are no easy answers to the global political questions raised by the proliferation of ICTs, there are relatively new approaches to the questions that look promising, including the emergence of individuals who see themselves as global citizens â people who participate in a global civil society that transcends national boundaries. Technology facilitates global citizens' ability to learn about global issues, to connect with others who care about similar issues, and to organize and act meaningfully in response. However, global citizens are also aware that technology in and of itself is no panacea, and that it can be used to manipulate and oppress.
Global citizens fight against oppressive uses of technology, often with technology. Technology helps them not only to participate in global conversations that affect us all but also to amplify the voices of those who have been marginalized or altogether missing from such conversations. Moreover, global citizens are those who are willing to grapple with large and complex issues that are truly global in scope and who attempt to chart a course forward that benefits all people, regardless of their locations around the globe.
Gordon Brown implicitly alludes to the importance of global citizenship when he states that we need a global ethic of fairness and responsibility to inform global problem-solving. Human rights, disease, development, security, terrorism, climate change, and poverty are among the issues that cannot be addressed successfully by any one nation alone. Individual actors (nation states, NGOs, etc.) can help, but a collective of actors, both state and non-state, is required. Brown suggests that we must combine the power of a global ethic with the power to communicate and organize globally in order for us to address effectively the world's most pressing issues.
Individuals and groups today are able to exert influence that is disproportionate to their numbers and the size of their arsenals through their use of "soft power" techniques, as TED speakers Joseph Nye and Shashi Tharoor observe. This is consistent with Maajid Nawaz's discussion of the power of symbols and narratives. Small groups can develop powerful narratives that help shape the views and actions of people around the world. While governments are far more accustomed to exerting power through military force, they might achieve their interests more effectively by implementing soft power strategies designed to convince others that they want the same things. According to Nye, replacing a "zero-sum" approach (you must lose in order for me to win) with a "positive-sum" one (we can both win) creates opportunities for collaboration, which is necessary if we are to begin to deal with problems that are global in scope.
Let's get started
Collectively, the TEDTalks in this course explore how ICTs are used by and against governments, citizens, activists, revolutionaries, extremists, and other political actors in efforts both to preserve and disrupt the status quo. They highlight the ways that ICTs have opened up new forms of communication and activism as well as how the much-hailed revolutionary power of ICTs can and has been co-opted by oppressive regimes to reassert their control.
By listening to the contrasting voices of this diverse group of TED speakers, which includes activists, journalists, professors, politicians, and a former member of an extremist organization, we can begin to develop a more nuanced understanding of the ways that technology can be used both to facilitate and contest a wide variety of political movements. Global citizens who champion democracy would do well to explore these intersections among politics and technology, as understanding these connections is a necessary first step toward MacKinnon's laudable goal of building a world in which "government and technology serve the world's people and not the other way around."
Let's begin our exploration of the intersections among politics and technology in today's globalized world with a TEDTalk from Ian Goldin, the first Director of the 21st Century School, Oxford University's think tank/research center. Goldin's talk will set the stage for us, exploring the integrated, complex, and technology rich global landscape upon which the political struggles for power examined by other TED speakers play out.
![government and society essay Navigating our global future](https://pi.tedcdn.com/r/pe.tedcdn.com/images/ted/125000_800x600.jpg?u%5Br%5D=2&u%5Bs%5D=0.5&u%5Ba%5D=0.8&u%5Bt%5D=0.03&quality=89&w=320)
Navigating our global future
i. "Welcome to Revolution 2.0, Ghonim Says," CNN, February 9, 2011. http://www.cnn.com/video/?/video/world/2011/02/09/wael.ghonim.interview.cnn.
Relevant talks
![government and society essay How social media can make history](https://pi.tedcdn.com/r/pe.tedcdn.com/images/ted/59ead9099fde9f11dfa640dfe3e3c6144237825b_1600x1200.jpg?u%5Br%5D=2&u%5Bs%5D=0.5&u%5Ba%5D=0.8&u%5Bt%5D=0.03&quality=89&w=320)
Clay Shirky
How social media can make history.
![government and society essay How the Net aids dictatorships](https://pi.tedcdn.com/r/pe.tedcdn.com/images/ted/117223_800x600.jpg?u%5Br%5D=2&u%5Bs%5D=0.5&u%5Ba%5D=0.8&u%5Bt%5D=0.03&quality=89&w=320)
Evgeny Morozov
How the net aids dictatorships.
![government and society essay Wiring a web for global good](https://pi.tedcdn.com/r/pe.tedcdn.com/images/ted/104034_800x600.jpg?u%5Br%5D=2&u%5Bs%5D=0.5&u%5Ba%5D=0.8&u%5Bt%5D=0.03&quality=89&w=320)
Gordon Brown
Wiring a web for global good.
![government and society essay Global power shifts](https://pi.tedcdn.com/r/pe.tedcdn.com/images/ted/209889_800x600.jpg?u%5Br%5D=2&u%5Bs%5D=0.5&u%5Ba%5D=0.8&u%5Bt%5D=0.03&quality=89&w=320)
Global power shifts
![government and society essay Why the world needs WikiLeaks](https://pi.tedcdn.com/r/pe.tedcdn.com/images/ted/185000_800x600.jpg?u%5Br%5D=2&u%5Bs%5D=0.5&u%5Ba%5D=0.8&u%5Bt%5D=0.03&quality=89&w=320)
Julian Assange
Why the world needs wikileaks.
![government and society essay A global culture to fight extremism](https://pi.tedcdn.com/r/talkstar-photos.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/0409b24f-5ad0-478f-8073-c53f07a4c210/MaajidNawaz_2011G-embed.jpg?u%5Br%5D=2&u%5Bs%5D=0.5&u%5Ba%5D=0.8&u%5Bt%5D=0.03&quality=89&w=320)
Maajid Nawaz
A global culture to fight extremism.
![government and society essay Let's take back the Internet!](https://pi.tedcdn.com/r/pe.tedcdn.com/images/ted/ae341aa914ce378c4288807c8aed59a461ee648e_800x600.jpg?u%5Br%5D=2&u%5Bs%5D=0.5&u%5Ba%5D=0.8&u%5Bt%5D=0.03&quality=89&w=320)
Rebecca MacKinnon
Let's take back the internet.
![government and society essay Why nations should pursue soft power](https://pi.tedcdn.com/r/pe.tedcdn.com/images/ted/133260_800x600.jpg?u%5Br%5D=2&u%5Bs%5D=0.5&u%5Ba%5D=0.8&u%5Bt%5D=0.03&quality=89&w=320)
Shashi Tharoor
Why nations should pursue soft power.
![government and society essay A historic moment in the Arab world](https://pi.tedcdn.com/r/pe.tedcdn.com/images/ted/54494e1a10f86cd308fda68fa0736d47f0a1404f_800x600.jpg?u%5Br%5D=2&u%5Bs%5D=0.5&u%5Ba%5D=0.8&u%5Bt%5D=0.03&quality=89&w=320)
Wadah Khanfar
A historic moment in the arab world.
![government and society essay Inside the Egyptian revolution](https://pi.tedcdn.com/r/pe.tedcdn.com/images/ted/ca7a7633faf1126c6480f4bb66d454075bb177fe_800x600.jpg?u%5Br%5D=2&u%5Bs%5D=0.5&u%5Ba%5D=0.8&u%5Bt%5D=0.03&quality=89&w=320)
Wael Ghonim
Inside the egyptian revolution.
- Practice Test
- Useful Tips – Tricks
- Full Writing Review
- General Writing Task
- Writing Task 1
- Writing Task 2
- Writing Exercises
- Writing Sample – Topics
- Writing Vocabulary
- Speaking Vocabulary
- Intro Question
- Speaking Part 1
- Speaking Part 2
- Speaking Part 2 – Audio
- Speaking Part 3
- IELTS Books
- Recent Exams
- IELTS Vocabulary
- Essay from Examiners
- IELTS Ideas
![government and society essay Logo](https://ieltspracticeonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/eng_small.png)
IELTS App - For Mobile
Ready for the IELTS exam with our IELTS app. Over 2 million downloads
![government and society essay Download App](https://ieltspracticeonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/app-store-google-play-apple.png)
Popular Last 24h
Describe a ïŹlm that made you laugh, cue card #50: talk about someone who encourages you to achieve goals or someone who encouraged you to achieve a goal, ielts listening actual test 19 â full answer, ielts speaking part 1 : study (question-answer), describe a person who has interesting ideas or opinions, describe a time when you had a problem with using the computer, describe a trip you took by bike.
- IELTS Test/Skills FAQs
- IELTS Scoring in Detail
- Forecast Speaking – 2023
- List IELTS Speaking Part 3
- List IELTS Speaking Part 1
- IELTS Writing 2023 – Actual Test
Our Telegram
Join our community for IELTS preparation and share and download materials.
The information on this site is for informational purposes only. IELTS is a registered trademark of the University of Cambridge ESOL, the British Council, and IDP Education Australia. This site and its owners are not affiliated, approved or endorsed by University of Cambridge ESOL, the British Council, or IDP Education Australia.
Latest Articles
Writing task 2: knowledge in books/internet, writing task 1: the number of international applicants to the universities, ielts speaking part 1: flowers, c.a.m ielts 19 listening: test 4, c.a.m ielts 19 listening: test 3, most popular, describe a person whom you met for the ïŹrst time and made you happy, topic: experience is the best teacher, describe something difïŹcult you would like to succeed in doing, in many countriesïŒtoday there are many highly qualified graduates without employment..
ieltspracticeonline All Rights Reserved
IELTS Essay Topic #14 Government and Society
- Post category: Essay Topic
What Governments Can Do
- Governments provide public services like healthcare and education
- They support people who are living in poverty or unable to work
- Governments raise money by taxing working people
- They can spend money on resources and campaigns
- They can introduce new laws
- They can impose taxes
- They can raise peopleâs awareness of issues (e.g. climate change/healthy eating)
- They can influence peopleâs habits and opinions
- They can create jobs/more job opportunities
- They can regulate the activities of companies such as banks
- They can provide resources for schools
- They are also responsible for the security and well-being of their citizens
- They control armed forces and police forces
Public Services
- Governments pay the salaries of public sector workers like police officers and teachers
- The necessary money is raised by taxing peopleâs income
- Free education and healthcare may be provided by the state
- Some governments control public transport systems and even TV channels
- In other countries, these services are provided by private companies
- Some people believe that competition between private companies is good
- It helps to improve quality while bringing prices down
- Other people think that essential services should be free
- Governments should pay for them
Censorship: Opinion
- Governments can censor what public sees or reads in the media
- To a certain extent censorship is necessary
- We should use censorship to protect children from violent images
- Some computer games involve killing people or committing crimes
- The Internet also needs to be controlled
- Many websites show pornography and violence
- There should be age limits for websites and computers games
- Parents need to take responsibility for checking what their children watch
- It is impossible for governments to control everything we see
Video Cameras in Public Places
- The use of CCTV is becoming widespread
- Video cameras have been installed in many public places
- They are supposed to protect us and deter criminals
- Many people think that this surveillance violates our privacy
- The authorities could build databases with our pictures and identities
- We should not be treated like criminals
Smart Cards: Positives
- Governments will probably introduce a digital identification card system
- Smart cards will have benefits and drawbacks
- They could help to reduce crime
- They could hold personal information, such as DNA
- Digital bank cards could contain fingerprint information
- It would be very difficult for criminals to use a stolen card
- It would be easier for police to identify people and catch criminals
Smart Cards: Negatives
- Many people are worried about losing their privacy
- Governments could store all our personal and medical information
- This information could be used by insurance companies
- Employers could check our health records
People with Disabilities
- People with disabilities should be treated the same as everybody else
- They should have the same rights as other people
- They should have access to the same jobs as other citizens
- Discriminations against disabled people is illegal in many countries
- Ramps and lifts for wheelchairs should be installed in public buildings
- Support teacher can be employed to help children with learning difficulties
25 Essay Topics for American Government Classes
Writing Ideas That Will Make Students Think
- Teaching Resources
- An Introduction to Teaching
- Tips & Strategies
- Policies & Discipline
- Community Involvement
- School Administration
- Technology in the Classroom
- Teaching Adult Learners
- Issues In Education
- Becoming A Teacher
- Assessments & Tests
- Elementary Education
- Secondary Education
- Special Education
- Homeschooling
- M.Ed., Curriculum and Instruction, University of Florida
- B.A., History, University of Florida
If you are a teacher searching for essay topics to assign to your U.S. government or civics class or looking for ideas, do not fret. It is easy to integrate debates and discussions into the classroom environment. These topic suggestions provide a wealth of ideas for written assignments such as position papers , compare-and-contrast essays , and argumentative essays . Scan the following 25 question topics and ideas to find just the right one. You'll soon be reading interesting papers from your students after they grapple with these challenging and important issues.
- Compare and contrast what is a direct democracy versus representative democracy.
- React to the following statement: Democratic decision-making should be extended to all areas of life including schools, the workplace, and the government.
- Compare and contrast the Virginia and New Jersey plans. Explain how these led to the Great Compromise .
- Pick one thing about the U.S. Constitution including its amendments that you think should be changed. What modifications would you make? Explain your reasons for making this change.
- What did Thomas Jefferson mean when he said, "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants?" Do you think that this statement still applies to today's world?
- Compare and contrast mandates and conditions of aid regarding the federal government's relationship with states. For example, how has the Federal Emergency Management Agency delivered support to states and commonwealths that have experienced natural disasters?
- Should individual states have more or less power compared to the federal government when implementing laws dealing with topics such as the legalization of marijuana and abortion ?
- Outline a program that would get more people to vote in presidential elections or local elections.
- What are the dangers of gerrymandering when it comes to voting and presidential elections?
- Compare and contrast the major political parties in the United States. What policies are they preparing for upcoming elections?
- Why would voters choose to vote for a third party, even though they know that their candidate has virtually no chance of winning?
- Describe the major sources of money that are donated to political campaigns. Check out the Federal Election Regulatory Commission's website for information.
- Should corporations be treated as individuals regarding being allowed to donate to political campaigns? Look at the 2010 Citizens United v. FEC ruling on the issue. Defend your answer.
- Explain the role of social media in connecting interest groups that have grown stronger as the major political parties have grown weaker.
- Explain why the media has been called the fourth branch of government. Include your opinion on whether this is an accurate portrayal.
- Compare and contrast the campaigns of U.S. Senate and House of Representatives candidates.
- Should term limits be instituted for members of Congress? Explain your answer.
- Should members of Congress vote their conscience or follow the will of the people who elected them into office? Explain your answer.
- Explain how executive orders have been used by presidents throughout the history of the U.S. What is the number of executive orders issued by the current president?
- In your opinion, which of the three branches of the federal government has the most power? Defend your answer.
- Which of the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment do you consider the most important? Explain your answer.
- Should a school be required to get a warrant before searching a student's property? Defend your answer.
- Why did the Equal Rights Amendment fail? What kind of campaign could be run to see it passed?
- Explain how the 14th Amendment has affected civil liberties in the United States from the time of its passage at the end of the Civil War.
- Do you think that the federal government has enough, too much or just the right amount of power? Defend your answer.
- How to Teach the Compare and Contrast Essay
- American Government Journal Topics
- 101 Compare and Contrast Essay Topics
- 61 General Expository Essay Topic to Practice Academic Writing
- High School Debate Topics
- Expository Essay Genre With Suggested Prompts
- Social Studies Curriculum Plan of Study
- Halloween Lesson Plan Ideas
- Social Studies Warmups: Exercises to Get Students Thinking
- Beef Up Critical Thinking and Writing Skills: Comparison Essays
- Public Vs. Private School Teaching
- Teaching Tools for Viewing Cosmos
- Cosmos Episode 10 Viewing Worksheet
- January Writing Prompts
- April Writing Prompts
- Stage a Debate in Class
50 Latest Government s IELTS Topics
- Unlimited Task 1 checks Get all the feedback you need to keep improving your charts and letters.
- Unlimited Task 2 checks Practice and perfect your skills with essays.
- Personalized suggestions Know how to boost your score.
- Detailed mistakes analysis Get instant feedback. Spot every mistake.
- Topic ideas generator Get topic-specific ideas to enhance your writing.
- Vocabulary helper Get the right words for any topic.
- Progress tracking Track your writing improvements.
Free IELTS lessons signup
![government and society essay home](https://ielts-up.com/images/home-img.png)
- Academic practice
- General practice
- Task 1 Academic
- Task 1 General
- Task 2 (essay)
Government & society writing task 2 questions for IELTS
Here you can find common IELTS essay questions for "Government & Society" topic.
The government should ban smoking in all public places, even though this would restrict some other people's freedoms.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer.
Some people advocate death penalty for those who committed violent crimes. Others say that capital punishment is unacceptable in contemporary society.
Describe advantages and disadvantages of death penalty and give your opinion.
Motor vehicle crashes are one of the leading causes of teen deaths. To prevent such road accidents, the government should ban people under 24 to drive motorcycles.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Violent TV-shows and aggressive video games should be banned on governmental level.
Some people claim that it is immoral to exploit animals, and that the government should prohibit using animals for scientific research. In the meantime, others argue that exploiting animals is crucial for allowing scientists to learn more about human biology and health.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Immigration has a major impact on the society.
What are the main reasons of immigration?
To what consequences can it lead?
The government should control the Internet to reduce cyber-crime and ensure safety of users.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
- Architecture and Design
- Asian and Pacific Studies
- Business and Economics
- Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
- Computer Sciences
- Cultural Studies
- Engineering
- General Interest
- Geosciences
- Industrial Chemistry
- Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies
- Jewish Studies
- Library and Information Science, Book Studies
- Life Sciences
- Linguistics and Semiotics
- Literary Studies
- Materials Sciences
- Mathematics
- Social Sciences
- Sports and Recreation
- Theology and Religion
- Publish your article
- The role of authors
- Promoting your article
- Abstracting & indexing
- Publishing Ethics
- Why publish with De Gruyter
- How to publish with De Gruyter
- Our book series
- Our subject areas
- Your digital product at De Gruyter
- Contribute to our reference works
- Product information
- Tools & resources
- Product Information
- Promotional Materials
- Orders and Inquiries
- FAQ for Library Suppliers and Book Sellers
- Repository Policy
- Free access policy
- Open Access agreements
- Database portals
- For Authors
- Customer service
- People + Culture
- Journal Management
- How to join us
- Working at De Gruyter
- Mission & Vision
- De Gruyter Foundation
- De Gruyter Ebound
- Our Responsibility
- Partner publishers
![government and society essay government and society essay](https://www.degruyter.com/assets/images/966c7a7b7d8c37697e77128b235c1699-degruyter-print-media-logo.jpg)
Your purchase has been completed. Your documents are now available to view.
The Relationship between Government and Civil Society in the Era of COVID-19
COVID-19 created an extraordinary social situation in which governments struggle to mitigate the harmful consequences of the pandemic. Challenging times show a societyâs resilience and capacity for solidarity and cohesion, the governmentâs ability to deal with emergencies effectively, the stability and inclusiveness of political systems, and their aptitude to respect democratic values. It is particularly important to examine this period from the point of view of civil society and civil society organizations (CSOs), since civil society plays a pivotal role in the alleviation and dissipation of societal troubles associated with the epidemic, indeed a vital role in curbing the virus. The civil sectorâs strength and resilience too is tested. As the studies in this Special Issue show, exploiting the potential of civil society was an option that only some countries have been able to seize - as a result of which they have effectively reduced the consequences of the calamity while increasing a sense of solidarity and belonging in their societies. Others, however, failed to recognize the importance of civil society and interpreted the situation as a âsingle-actor play on stageâ. Neither solidarity nor cohesion play out as values in these latter cases; instead the single actor â government â grabs the opportunity to play the role of the heroic savior and the exclusive problem solver, grabbing for itself both symbolic gains and increasing concentration of power. Citizens are expected to trust no one or no organization except the charismatic leader (or party). Thereby is forged a vertical and hierarchical chain of control, rather than a horizontally linked network of trust and cooperation. The studies and commentaries in this issue cover nine countries located on an imaginary line beginning in the United Kingdom, and extending through Germany, Austria, Hungary, Turkey, Israel, India, China and South Korea, representing various socio-political and economic systems. Embedded in elaborated theoretical understandings, this introductory essay examines the research articles of this Special Issue in which authors unfold the dynamics of CSO-government relations in the context of the world pandemic. These accounts sharpen our understanding of the preexisting shape of governmentâCSO relations. The introduction places the countries on a scale which classifies them according to the characteristics of civil societyâgovernment relations unfolding during the pandemic. One of the endpoints is represented by those countries where the CSOâs creative and constructive responses to the social challenges were prevented or blocked by the government. In this setup, CSOs were ignored at best, and restrictions undercut their abilities to contribute to the process of mitigating the pandemic and its consequences. Meanwhile, at the opposite end of this scale, are countries where the government, both central and local, invited civil society partners in the response to COVID-19, orchestrated high-quality and multilevel cross-sectoral cooperation, and provided partners with the necessary (financial) resources. In those cases, CSOs were empowered effectively to participate in a process designed to address the epidemic and its consequences in accordance with principles of participatory democracy.
COVID-19 created an extraordinary social situation in which governments struggle to mitigate the harmful consequences of the pandemic. Countries were instantaneously thrust into isolation from one another while their governments engaged in desperate searches for viable solutions and strategies. Experiencing these events as participating witnesses, including the seemingly endless quarantine and isolation, spurred my colleagues all over the world to share their thoughts and observations via online connections. In doing so, the idea to compose a Special Issue under the auspices of the Nonprofit Policy Forum emerged at the beginning of the Summer of 2020.
The significance of this period in our lives was indisputable, especially when we considered that challenging times serve as a litmus test for the deeply structured nature of different public systems: they show a societyâs resilience and capacity for solidarity and cohesion, the governmentâs ability to deal with emergencies effectively, the stability and inclusiveness of political systems, and their aptitude to respect democratic values â even in difficult times. It is particularly interesting to examine this period from the point of view of civil society and civil society organizations (CSOs), since civil society plays a pivotal role in the alleviation and dissipation of societal troubles associated with the epidemic, indeed a vital role in curbing the virus. The civil sectorâs strength and resilience too is tested by challenging times. Whether we speak about civil society in the broadest sense, or narrow our concerns to formalized civil society organizations, these periods of crisis sharply highlight the willingness and capacity of the sector (and of people) to sacrifice, to volunteer, and to assist the weak and vulnerable. The cohesion of society, its well-being and sense of security, is concomitantly forged in this experience. No doubt that there is an enormous potential in civil society and CSOs to amplify the efforts of government, especially in an emergency, both national and worldwide.
In times of crisis, the pluralist and social democratic visions that underlie the effective workings of civil society often fade. In some cases, governments overestimate the voluntary financial and physical efforts of the population fighting the virus, utilizing or even abusing the basic value of solidarity. In other cases, governments take advantage of the emergency to further strengthen pre-existing positions, moving ever closer to the elimination of democratic control and advancing authoritarian forms and structures.
As the studies in this volume show, exploiting the potential of civil society was an option that only some countries have been able to seize â as a result of which they have effectively reduced the consequences of the calamity while increasing a sense of solidarity and belonging in their societies. Others, however, failed to recognize the importance of civil society and interpreted the situation as a âsingle-actor play on stageâ [1] . Neither solidarity nor cohesion play out as values in these latter cases; instead the single actor â government â grabs the opportunity to play the role of the heroic savior and the exclusive problem solver, grabbing for itself both symbolic gains and increasing concentration of power. Citizens are expected to trust no one or no organization except the charismatic leader (or party). Thereby is forged a vertical and hierarchical chain of control, rather than a horizontally linked network of trust and cooperation.
The studies and commentaries in this issue cover nine countries located on an imaginary line between the United Kingdom and South Korea, representing various socio-political and economic systems. Some of them are part of the European Union, namely Germany, Austria, Hungary (though even these are very different from one another), and the United Kingdom, which was about to leave the EU while this Special Issue was being written. The Middle East is represented by Israel, East Asia by China and South Korea, South-Asia by India, and finally Turkey stands in its unique geographic position astride both Asia and Europe.
The endeavor of this volume is to explore and screen the dynamics of government â civil society (CSOs) [2] relations, as they were unwittingly tested by the pandemic during 2020. Questions central to our interests include: the implicit/explicit role which civil society played in the process of defense, harm relief, and recovery; the provision of the necessary means to perform these tasks; and the role civil society played, or might have played, in disseminating information and assisting the population.
The studies presented in this issue examine how the epidemic has affected the economy and society in general; they show how deeply the civil sector and CSOs have been hit by the emergency and the consequences of the lockdowns they endured; they introduce and assess the overall government strategies that were employed to fight the epidemic. GovernmentâCSO co-operation is always interpreted in the context of the system on which these relationships are built, and which determine the quality of these relationships during the epidemic. Each study puts the civil society of the concerned country in a different theoretical framework, which persuasively explains the effective, cumbersome, or sometimes uncooperative relations that came to prevail in the emergency. The studies also examine the strategies CSOs developed to adapt to the exceptional situation and they consider their efforts to mitigate the social and human consequences of the epidemic. In most cases, the impact of the epidemic and the lockdowns is also examined.
Most of the studies include empirical research, the results of which are based on data collected in the first wave, and early stages of the second wave [3] , of the epidemic. The methods and the scale of these research efforts vary. Methodologies range from questionnaire surveys to interviewing and text-analysis, to document review, and to the processing of statistical and media data. These studies cover various types of CSOs in terms of their primary objectives, functions, and action domains. In this respect, mostly welfare CSOs (e.g. in the German, Austrian, UK, Indian articles) are examined, but other service CSOs (e.g. educational or cultural in Hungary, or migrantsâ, irregular migrantsâ services in Turkey), and advocacy (e.g. in the case of the Hungarian article) are also represented. However, these functional categories overlap â most of the CSOs are multi-purpose in terms of their diverse activities. Thus, service functions are typically inseparable from the representation of the interests of target groups (e.g. the poor, the disadvantaged) ( Young 2000 , 2006 ), or cultural organizationsâ objectives from the struggle for the recognition of minorities ( Mosley 2010 ). CSOs, even if they do not directly pursue advocacy, are agents of shaping government policies ( Boris and Mosher-Williams 1998 ; Chinnock and Salamon 2002 ; Cohen and Arato 1997 ; Edwards 2009 ; Habib and Taylor 1999 ; Van Til 2000 ) â as the article in this issue by KövĂ©r, Antal and DeĂĄk explicates.
No less important are the historical contexts and theoretical frameworks in which the authors interpret the civil sphere of their own societies and government-civil sector relations. The Austrian (by Michael Meyer) and German (by Annette Zimmer and Eckhart Priller) research studies conceptualize CSOs, employing the Salamon and Anheier (1998) model, as a corporatist/welfare partnership regime. The South Korean civil society is interpreted by Bok Gyo Jeong and Sung-Ju Kim in the frame of Edwardsâs three images of civil society: as associational life, as the good society, and as the public sphere ( Edwards 2004 ). The relationship between the government and civil society is classified along two criteria: the level of government involvement and the public policy stage. The first criterion refers to the extent of which civil society contributes to governance in the multi-sectoral partnership, while the second refers to the extent of civil societyâs involvement in the public policy formulation and policy implementation process. The Hungarian civil society is theorized by Ăgnes KövĂ©r, Attila Antal and Izabella DeĂĄk partly in the well-known frame of Youngâs (2000 , 2006) complementary-supplementary-adversarial model, and partly in the improved 4C model of Najam (2000) which was modified to fit authoritarian conditions. This theoretical model of the authoritarian stateâs impact on civil society provides an adaptable frame for understanding the plight of Chinese and Turkish civil society, as explained in the commentary in this issue by Mark Sidel and Ming Hu, and the article by Erhan Dogan and Deniz Genc, respectively.
A group of studies focused primarily on the devastating social impacts of COVID-19. GovernmentâCSO relations were examined in light of governmentâs ability to provide the means for CSOs to carry out their often momentous, sometimes life-saving tasks during the crisis. The accounts of the United Kingdom by Margaret Harris, and of India by Rajesh Tandon both embedded their analysis in different maleficent social processes which emanated during the pandemic or increased and became more visible as its result. The positions of the 10 million âunshieldedâ, so-called âless vulnerableâ population in the UK, the unprotected and destitute internal migrants in India, and in the same vein, the irregular migrants in Turkey or the disadvantaged rural population (often Roma) in Hungary, are at the core of these social processes.
1 The Scale
There are many ways to structure and theorize civil societyâgovernment relations, and to examine the functioning and main characteristics of civil society in this context. Pauly, De Rynck, and Verschuere (2016) examine civil society-government relations from a neo-Gramscian perspective and analyze the transition from government to governance â especially participatory governance. Rules, practices and narratives form the nodal points of CSOâgovernment relations in their analysis. In the field of social theory, Riley and FernĂĄndez (2014) challenge the bottom-up versus top-down approach and the context of heteronomous versus autonomous civil society in the totalitarian and authoritarian state regimeâs frame of reference. Infiltration theory ( Klein and Lee 2019 ) draws on the idea that the main feature of civil society is interdependence rather than independence and the boundaries of the actors (governmentâCSOsâmarket) are permeable or blurred ( Van Til 1988 ). This theory, which encompasses civil societyâgovernmentâmarket relations, distinguishes between forward and backward infiltration among each of the actors. Inside these categories the authors differentiate among policies of influence, policies of substitution and policies of occupation ( Klein and Lee 2019 ). This theory provides a dynamic view of civil societyâgovernmentâeconomic actorsâ interrelations and analyzes the possible permeations effectuated by the actors of this triad. Klein and Lee criticized the domain-focused [4] accounts of the politics of civil society, whose thrust is to preserve the autonomy and distinctiveness of civil society from the intrusion of state or economic actors. Rather, they argue, there are mutual permeations among the sectors and that disparate forms and strategies of infiltrations are almost unavoidable. Moreover, these permutations determine the quality of relations of the actors in the triad. Contrary to Klein and Leeâs model, GrĂžnbjerg and Smith (2021) argue that the relationship of civil societyâgovernmentâmarketâinformal (household) actors varies systematically across the domains, as they explicate the applicability of the domain-based conceptual frame. In Youngâs (2000 , 2006) theory, the supplementary and complementary model relates the government and CSOs in a service provision context, while the adversarial model highlights the advocacy or watchdog function of civil society. The theory is well supported by historical evidence and clearly indicates the ways by which the two domains have infiltrated each otherâs fields. Finally, Najam (2000) whose 4C model was adapted to authoritarian conditions in Hungary in the article within this Special Issue, distinguishes four types of relations between the government and civil society: cooperation, co-optation, complementarity, and confrontation. According to Klein and Lee (2019) most analysis of governmentâcivil society relation limits itself to the of politics of influence and it is therefore unable fully to describe the complex reality of these relations.
Embedded in these theoretical understandings, this introduction examines the research articles of this Special Issue in which authors unfold the dynamics of CSOâgovernment relations in the context of the world pandemic. These accounts sharpen our understanding of the preexisting shape of governmentâCSO relations. If we wanted to place the countries on a scale which classifies them according to the characteristics of civil societyâgovernment relations unfolding during the pandemic, one of the endpoints would be represented by those countries where the CSOâs creative and constructive responses to the social challenges were prevented or blocked by the government. In this setup, CSOs were ignored at best, and restrictions undercut their abilities to contribute to the process of mitigating the pandemic and its consequences. Meanwhile, at the opposite end of this scale, are countries where the government, both central and local, invited civil society partners in the response to COVID-19, orchestrated high-quality and multilevel cross-sectoral cooperation, and provided partners with the necessary (financial) resources. In those cases, CSOs were empowered effectively to participate in a process designed to address the epidemic and its consequences in accordance with principles of participatory democracy.
The quality of CSOâgovernment(state) relations can be gauged along the dimensions of autonomy , partnership, and inward and outward solidarity . According to Salamon and Anheierâs (1998) seminal work on âsocial originsâ, which highlights the civil sectorâs embeddedness in broader social, political, and economic realities, underlying eco-political regimes determine the relationship between government and civil society/civil sector. The predominant factors are autonomy ( Read 2008 ), partnership (participation) ( Gaventa 2006 ; SĂžrvoll and Bengtsson 2019 ) and solidarity (inward and outward (or political Foley and Edwards 1996 ). These three factors â discussed by a great many social scientists â capture the deep characteristics of civil society, linking it to democracy. Walzer identifies this as the âcivil society argumentâ: âOnly a democratic state can create a democratic civil society; only a democratic civil society can sustain a democratic state. The civility that makes democratic politics possible can only be learned in the associational networks.â ( Walzer 1992 , 104)
Autonomy of civil society and its organizations refers to a balance between autonomy from the state and autonomy from the market, as well as emphasizing the role of norms of trust and reciprocity ( Della Porta 2020 ). The autonomy of civil society in particular, depends on its ability to protect itself against both subsystems (state and market) ( Cohen and Arato 1997 ) since it can be jeopardized directly by state/governmental power ( Tocqueville 2000 ) and by the colonizing tendencies of economic forces ( Cohen and Arato 1997 ).
Autonomy and independence are intertwined notions. In countries dominated by authoritarian regimes, CSOs are subjected to direct (legal and/or political), top-down control by an all-embracing state, whereas in more democratic market-based countries where state-civil society cooperation takes the form of participation and collaboration, resource dependency might jeopardize the autonomy of CSOs. Interestingly, the state only appears as a threat to civil society in the liberal concept; in the communitarian conception the role of the state is central and its impact on civil society (and narrowly on CSOs) is not considered as encroachment ( Walzer 1998 ). Therefore, the communitarian social concept is often utilized as legitimating ideology for authoritarian endeavors. This is clearly traceable in the case of the Chinese, Turkish and Hungarian casesâ government-CSO relations, where populist autocracies are in power and frequently refer to communitarian ideals.
Partnership refers to collaboration among actors who seek common or complementary ends. Embodied in participatory democracy, participatory governance and decision making, its ideal form is deliberative democracy. Partnership means power sharing over the decision(policy)-making process, which has a double consequence: on the one hand a better public policy emerges that takes into account the needs of communities; on the other hand civilians themselves become interested agents in implementing the jointly developed policies. Pauly, De Rynck, and Verschuere (2016) explore how the relationship between government and civil society has been described in terms of a shift from âgovernmentâ to âgovernanceâ and how this shift is, to a great extent, based on underlying theories of modernity. The âpartnership argumentâ became pivotal in the âthird wayâ critique and redesign of welfare states at the end of â90s, drawing on Giddensâ assessment of the welfare political endeavor which disempowers civil society. Giddensâ (1998) critique of classical social democracy revolved around âthe centrality it attributes to the state in social and economic life, and for its distrust of civil society.â ( Mouffe 2005 , 57) As Giddens argues, âto allow for a widening of democracy, it is necessary to reform the state and government to make them act in partnership with civil society.â ( Mouffe 2005 , 58)
Solidarity is embodied in norms of reciprocity and common interests as well as mutual support within and among groups. Inward solidarity refers to a quality of human association, specifically the cohesive social bond that holds the members of an organization together in an association based on some level of conscious or intentional commitment (or âgroup identificationâ) on the part of members ( Rehg 2007 ). At the same time, inward solidarity encompasses sectoral solidarity, in which organizationsâ collective goals transcend the interests of individual organizations ( SĂžrvoll and Bengtsson 2019 ). Good examples are the Hungarian and the South Korean cases where the small and weak CSOs, mostly working in disadvantaged rural areas, were supported by the bigger and stronger ones who launched fundraising campaigns and collected donations to enhance their survival and that of their target groups. Alternatively, outward solidarity denotes the process in which CSOs strive to influence state policies by external activities, such as public debates and using different influence strategies over government policy ( SĂžrvoll and Bengtsson 2019 ). In this context, civil society is a counterweight of the (unresponsive or authoritarian) state; thus, âcitizens pressure authoritarians for change, protect themselves from tyranny, and democratize from belowâ ( Foley and Edwards 1996 : 46). In Youngâs (2000 , 2006) theory this may be viewed as the adversarial function of civil society; or in the infiltration theory, this would cover the politics of influence which focuses on pressuring incumbent policy makers or market actors to respond to the claims of civil societies ( Klein and Lee 2019 ).
Applying these indicators at the end of the scale where CSOs are disempowered, we might place China, commented on here by Sidel and Hu. Though the Party and state-directed responses to COVID-19 allocated a role for civil society groups â primarily in helping to provide services and in raising funds â those roles were subservient to state activities and were directed by the state. As Sidel and Hu explain, the COVID-era did not result in the advent of autonomy for Chinese civil society. COVID-specific CSO-government relations were based on preexisting, restrictive policies and statutes that have limited the role and autonomy of civil society organizations in China.
The application of certain theories blurs the concept of autonomy regarding Chinese civil societyâgovernment relations, where its absence is interpreted in permissive and non-negative terms. This tendency can be seen in the application of agency theory which emphasizes that there are âcomplex patterns of interaction between the state and societyâ in the Chinese context, and often refers to concepts such as âinterdependenceâ, âembeddednessâ and even âdependent autonomyâ and âcontingent symbiosisâ ( Stigum Gleiss and SĂŠther 2017 ). In a similar vein, another theoretical framework, which can be traced back to Durkheimâs notion of organic solidarity, emphasizes complementarianism and interdependence as pivotal ingredients of civil societyâstate relations ( Gao 2012 ). However, these theories seem to âdress the naked emperorâ, embellishing existing authoritarian relations and lack of autonomy and explaining them in positive terms. They deny the suppression of the adversarial function of civil society, which concomitantly destroys the criterion of outward solidarity. Summarizing the lessons of COVID-19 on civil societyâgovernment relations, Sidel and Hu assert that in such a strong, authoritarian state like China, where the state puts strong, restrictive policies in place toward civil society as the ânormal course of businessâ, these frameworks are not altered when a crisis such as COVID-19 hits. As they explain, the Chinese structure of authoritarian arrangements toward the charitable sector can adapt to even a major shock to the system such as COVID-19. The Chinese commentary points out the primacy and exclusive defining role of the state in governmentâCSO relations, which certainly challenges the view that nonprofits are necessarily a liberalizing or democratizing factor in autocratic regimes.
Next to the autonomy scale, is Turkey, analyzed by Dogan and Genc, where a significant part of civil society is characterized by religious and pre-modern aspirations. However, new fault lines are already visible compared to the earlier monolithic picture, especially after the last municipal elections, when opposition representatives came to power in Istanbul and several other large cities. In the COVID-era, this dissent of civility was well demonstrated, offering an alternative to the central governmentâs claims for exclusivity. The fundraising actions of local (opposition) governments and civilians were declared illegal by the central government, yet the viability of civil society was demonstrated by the witty and creative actions that have circumvented the central will and have effectively helped those in need in local constituencies. CSOs worked jointly with local and district government machinery to identify beneficiaries in the community, and to link them to services or enroll them in relevant schemes. A whole host of ingenious and shrewd solutions have been developed by local civil actors, such as the campaign entitled âpaying a neighborâs billâ (Askıda Fatura). In this campaign, a digital payment portal is provided for those citizens who want to pay the water and gas bills of fellow burghers who had lost their livelihoods because of the pandemic. This vivid example points out that CSOâgovernment relations are clearly defined by the characteristics of authoritarian systems, where the government is an active and intrusive shaper of civil society producing policies which exclusively support those organizations that comply with the system. At the same time, the outward solidarity, or the adversarial function of civil society is not tolerated, not even in the case of the so-called pro-government CSOs. Dogan and Genc interviewed one of the pro-government organizationsâ members, who asserted that âwhenever they criticized government or state institutions, they felt they were being ostracized by the relevant state authorities and their networks.â However, the aforementioned account also exemplifies the ingenuity of civil society and the form of resistance that manifests itself in inward solidarity. This phenomenon is found in the Hungarian article here as well.
During the pandemic, pro-government NGOs sought to collaborate with the authorities, but their work, just like the work of other CSOs, was largely ignored by the government. The criteria of autonomy, partnership and outward solidarity proved insufficient. In times of crisis as those of the pandemic, autocratic governments seek to take advantage of emergencies to further strengthen their positions vis-a-vis civil society by further advancing authoritarian forms and structures.
In both Turkey and China earlier crises, deriving from natural or social disasters, led to some weakening of governmental control. The Marmara earthquake in 1999. the Syrian refugee crisis after 2015 in Turkey, and the Yinchuan earthquake in Sichuan in 2008 each evoked a recovery and strengthening of civic activism, voluntarism and a more active and independent civil society. However, these efforts were thwarted after the disaster and governments enacted increasingly restrictive and/or coopting policies against CSOs that hampered their autonomous aspirations ( Sunata and Tosun 2018 ; Xu 2017 ). In Turkey, civic activism was diverted into NGOs endowed with religious ideologies and pre-modern characteristics that do not strengthen Turkish civil society or democratization but promote the reproduction of the reigning system ( Sunata and Tosun 2018 ). In China rigid restriction policies were enacted toward domestic as well as overseas NGOs in order to impede any cooperation between them.
These aforesaid processes are found in the study of Hungary, next over on our scale. This study applies the Najam 4C strategy in a modified form, adjusted to authoritarian societies. Ultimately, the same processes can be observed for all authoritarian regimes in relation to civil societyâgovernment relations. It is a futile question as to whether the causes of these processes are rooted in the qualities of a strong government or state, or a weak, polarized civil society. These qualities mutually reinforce each other, and as a result CSOs are prevented from acting as agents of democracy.
On our autonomy scale, a country like Hungary may be placed where an asymmetry of power allows the governmental actor to seek its desired hegemony â including consensus â by applying increasing levels of coercion, as the authors, KövĂ©r, Antal and DeĂĄk report. These authors conceptualize governmentâcivil society relations according to a â4C strategyâ â Cooptation, Coercion, Crowding out, and Creation (the creation of a new, loyal civil society). Based on pre-existing CSOâgovernment relations, the Hungarian government showed no intention to cooperate with the civil sector and the wider civil society, which might have served as an effective force in averting the consequences of the pandemic, alleviating the difficulties faced by people, and managing the conflicts that arise. The relationship between government and civil society in the epidemic has also been unilaterally defined by the stronger party. The government of âNational Cooperationâ ignored the opportunity to organize cross-sectoral cooperation and relied solely on its own central resources as being the â sole actor on the stageâ . The critical literature (e.g. Alvez and de Costa 2020 ; Simo and Bias 2007 ) concurs with the conclusions of the studies presented in this volume, that cross-sectoral cooperation magnifies government efforts and increases public confidence as well as social cohesion. Central government neglect, and in certain cases, hostile attitudes, have had surprisingly little impact on Hungarian CSOs, which in large part continued doing their job and taking responsibility for those who are in need and seeking support. Civil groups and CSOs organized unprecedented fundraising, used their own resources to support the disadvantaged, provided extra services, set up meal banks where needed, distributed digital equipment among children, and assisted the elderly and those living with disabilities. All these efforts were neither recognized nor compensated by the government. The multifaceted adverse governmental practices against CSOs proves that the Hungarian regime does not trust its civil society. Rather, it seeks to create a hegemony that requires consensus, by establishing pseudo-civilian organizations, and by continuous and extensive instrumentalizing of Hungarian minority organizations outside the border. However, this is only partially sufficient for legitimacy based on a symbolic or community-cultural definition ( Daloz 2009 ; Farkas 2015 ). The systemâs efforts to control civil activism tend to fail and members of society, at least from time to time, show that they understand the importance of independent CSOs and their social responsibilities.
Continuing along our scale, we move towards countries that might be less authoritarian but still disregard civil society and do not very often engage its forces in joint efforts with government. Israel offers a good example for this. As Schmid points out in his commentary, the governmentâs policies can be characterized by a lack of support for the work of CSOs, often threatening their very survival. The Israeli governmentâs ambivalence towards civil society consists of various well-known prejudices. One of them is that âCSOs which operate on the basis of the values of democracy, equality, freedom of expression, and the right to demonstrate and advocate for disadvantaged and excluded populations, undermine the stability of the government and the resilience of the countryâ, Schmid asserts. This point of view perceives CSOs as subverting forces which undermine governmental actions, constituting a âdeep stateâ â as Schmid calls it â, which is known in a different context as âshadow governmentâ or âshadow stateâ ( Haque 2002 ; Kamat 2004 ; Sutton and Arnove 2004 ). This expression often appears in developmental studies.
To avoid conflating the standpoints of developmental studies with the issues of the âdeep stateâ referred to by Schmid, we should briefly examine these approaches and their evolution. Developmental studies explore the issue of shadow government from the perspective of neoliberal globalism versus national sovereignty, asserting that the presence of international NGOs sometimes facilitates the neo-colonial tendencies of neoliberal capitalism. Here, serious criticism was leveled against international NGOs ( Jad 2004 ; Kamat 2003 , 2004 ; Manji and OâCoill 2002 ; Roy 2014 ) which were echoed and instrumentalized by national governments leaning toward authoritarianism, resulting in a shrinking space for civil society. The aforementioned Chinese experience is an extreme example. In this distrustful discourse, national governments infiltrate the civil sector, and obstruct civil societyâs ability to express criticism, while civil society seeks to hold politicians and government accountable. âUsually, discord and mistrust emerge from the actions of civil society which produce evidence to hold the government and political machinery and actors accountableâ â as Rajesh Tandon notes in his article here about Indian civil society. All in all, the more authoritarian a political regime, the more it tends to perceive âcivil societyâ as posing a threat to the reigning political order. At the same time, these perceptions question the adversarial function and impede the outward solidarity of civil society and contextualize it with a conflict paradigm ( Salamon, Sokolwski and Anheier 2000 ), according to which the relationship between the nonprofit sector and the state is fundamentally competitive. In contrast, for South Korea, Jeong and Kim reframe the deep state phenomenon along the lines of collaborative governance, based on Kettl (2000) .
Another underlying prejudice against CSOs is that they are perceived to be ineffective and inefficient, especially in comparison with for-profit organizations. Schmid clearly depicts the contradicting expectations directed towards CSOs as setting a dangerous trap for them. He explains that the Israeli government prefers for-profits to provide welfare services rather than CSOs. Favoring organizations that âonlyâ strive to gain profit makes them more transparent and therefore less threatening from the governmentâs perspective, and at the same time does not favor the commercialization of non-profits, thereby sustaining a suspicion that nonprofit organizations seek to make profit despite their declared motivation.
CSOâgovernment relations were characterized by these antecedents when the pandemic hit in Israel. The lack of trust and the missing paths and practices of cooperation ultimately made it impossible for civil society to play an active and effective role in fighting the virus and mitigating its consequences. Accordingly, the government did not aid CSOs in the crisis, ârather governmental agencies piled up bureaucratic obstaclesâ and let organizations fade and collapse, even die, intensely highlighting the governmentâs position toward civil society.
The next country on the scale might be India, where, arguably, constructive cooperation has characterized CSO-government relations. As Rajesh Tandon summarizes in his study: âIndiaâs civil society acted both independently and in close cooperation with national, provincial and local governmentsâ and responded efficiently to the distress caused by the pandemic and the lockdown. CSO-governmental relations were harmonious, with contributions of civil society encouraged by the government. However, as the pandemic crisis unfolded, tensions grew, overturning the harmony of cooperation and creating mistrust. Particularly two unilateral governmental actions contributed to undermining trust. The first was limiting public consultation on important social issues which led to the passing of legislation and constitutional amendments that have worked to the detriment of environmental protection, labor and farmers. The second was establishment of a fund where sums earmarked for other societal purposes (like social welfare) were channeled into, and into which donations to CSOs from national or international donors were diverted. This process undermined the service and survival potential of grassroots social welfare organizations, asserts Tandon. âNGO-Government Relations: A Source of Life or Kiss of Death?â â this well-fitting title of Tandonâs paper, illuminates the dynamics of cooperation and contestation between state and civil society. Although the government cooperates with CSOs on a local level, a growing intolerance has emerged toward civil society â questioning or critiquing policies, programs and procedures that do not help the poor and the excluded. All this casts a dark shadow over CSOâgovernment collaboration in India.
Further along the scale are three welfare societies where most of the criteria we set at the outset have slowly been met: in Germany, Austria, and the United Kingdom, autonomy, participation and solidarity unfolded in rather complete forms.
Zimmer and Priller, examined Germany in the context of corporatist federalism. A high level of decentralization, multi-level governance, and a long tradition of voluntarism are all characteristics of this scheme. The majority of CSOs operate in the field of social welfare, and the system, as in the case of Austria, follows the corporatist model of the Salamon and Anheier (1998) classification, which locates these countries as high in government expenses and high in the prominence of nonprofit organizations. Corporatism or neo-corporatism [5] represents the incorporation of societal actors into the policy process on each level of governance, typically by means of non-parliamentary negotiations and deliberation, and close cooperation between the state, large associations, and other social actors ( Zimmer 1999 ). This system demonstrates successful participatory governance and policy making, on the levels of policy development and policy implementation. However, as the authors explain, in recent decades, the neo-corporatist tradition of the country has diminished and is no longer strongly in place.
Although the traditionally existing, balanced nonprofit sectorâgovernment cooperation worked functionally and proved efficient during the pandemic and the benefits of the corporatist system â including the elements of autonomy and solidarity â unfolded, the authors report several areas of concern. They find no notable difference between for-profit and nonprofit service providers in the social domain and observe that nonprofits are treated on equal footing with for-profits. Consequently, most nonprofits operating in this domain have become more business-like in recent years. This government strategy was particularly intense during the pandemic, as both federal and regional governments treated nonprofits as if they were businesses and market players. The authors are concerned that the specific characteristics of nonprofits have not been recognized in government rescue programs, neither at the federal nor regional levels, and that they have been treated as a proxy of commercial enterprises. This process threatens to further commercialize or hybridize nonprofits, affecting organizational design and practice. Further, it takes a big step towards social service commodification, undermining norms and values inherent to this sector which have long stood as justification for the primary engagement of nonprofits in these fields ( Anheier and Krlev 2014 ). The authors report a shift in membership-based organizations toward contract-like relationships in which charges must be paid for services received.
Regarding the partnership criterion, the authors report that the Federal Government handled matters in a top-down manner and did not give civil society a voice. Regional governments which developed effective programs and invested significant resources into recovery projects behaved similarly. Programs were not developed in partnership, and, as the authors note, in some cases, local politicians forged their own political capital using the pandemic. One consequence of the lack of feedback and participatory planning was that bureaucratic measures were not relaxed, which made accessing (or coping with) programs more difficult, particularly for smaller organizations. However, the authors highlighted that even though the policies of regional governments were not coordinated and followed disparate patterns, all of them were planned and carried out in a party-politics-free manner. Another positive development was that in some provinces, local governments saw an opportunity in the pandemic to further strengthen cooperation with a wide variety of organizations.
Zimmer and Prillerâs paper also draws attention to processes that are expected to have a significant impact on German civil society even after the crisis. They highlight the professionalization of non-profits and the increasing exclusion of volunteers from formalized organizations, but at the same time, increases in more spontaneous, less formalized, fundamentally neighborhood-based volunteering and civic engagement. The latter manifested as part of an explosion of solidarity during the epidemic, when spontaneous volunteering rocketed far beyond demand and placement opportunities. The authors also expressed concern about the accelerating polarization of German civil society along pro-democratic versus nationalist lines. During the COVID-era, the concept of âcharismatic leadershipâ also became popular and will likely influence the countryâs political culture in the future. In light of the spread of populism and polarization in Europe, these phenomena are increasingly worrisome.
Austria, like Germany, can be characterized as a federal corporate system. Its corporative schemes are particularly dominant in the field of social services and healthcare, where 80% of organizational revenue comes from government sources. According to Meyerâs study here, CSOs in Austria have been severely hit by the pandemic and the resulting closures. In the early stages of the pandemic the federal government began negotiations on fixed-cost subsidies for NGOs, in a democratic process involving CSO representatives. This reflected an exceptional perspective in which social service providing CSOs are seen as stabilizers of the economy. Austria is unique among our nine countries in that it reports a positive impact of the epidemic on governmentânonprofit sector relations: With the creation of its nonprofit fund, the nonprofit sector has been legally recognized for the very first time. This legislation was passed at the height of the epidemic so the government could allocate the enormous resources [6] made available for the sector, since criteria by which CSOs are defined were previously missing. This made CSOâgovernment relations more transparent and stable. Meyerâs paper presents remarkable empirical research, in which a focus group discussion reveals strengths and weaknesses of cooperation between different levels of government and NGOs working in social and health services. Perhaps its most important findings are: First, the more trust that had already been built up in previous cooperation, the better the collaboration worked during the pandemic. We have seen, for example, in Schmidâs commentary on the situation in Israel, how a lack of trust and prejudice reinforce each other as a vicious cycle, and how society and political action lose the potentials that lie in their own NGOs. Second, the rapid introduction and application of new technologies, has sped up the coordination procedures between the government and CSOs and made them more efficient. Finally, the lack of standards or their variations from province to province caused confusion among NGOs and made it difficult for them to cooperate. The Meyer study does not raise concerns about the marketization and hybridization of CSOs. Moreover, it recommends that the government encourage NGO entrepreneurship to enhance autonomous and flexible responses to crises. The study does, however, raise concerns about state paternalism intensifying as a result of the pandemic, particularly with respect to the smaller CSOs.
A kind of inversion of civil society-government relations can be observed towards the end of the scale. Contrary to the authoritarian extreme where the governments excluded â or at best, ignored â CSOs from remedying the consequences of the pandemic, in the United Kingdom the state left the resolution of problems mostly, or in the case of certain social groups, exclusively to CSOs. Here, civil society found itself overwhelmed by the magnitude of tasks expected of it and assigned to it.
The U.K. is identified as a mixture of the liberal and the corporatist regimes by Salamon and his coauthors (2000) and as a marketized welfare state by Harris (2018) . Harrisâs paper in this issue confirms that previous patterns of CSOâgovernment cooperation have persisted in the COVID situation. The study highlights that the boundaries between the government and the civil sector are blurred, with the state shifting responsibility for the social sphere to the civil sector, often showcasing as though these were governmental services. Harris has previously described this as the governmentâs encroachment to the field of civil society (2018), which also manifests itself as an attempt to limit the functions of advocacy and lobbying while strongly encouraging civilians to provide welfare â social services, especially those that the state considers important ( Harris 2018 ). Limited state responsibility has also characterized the pandemic, although the government did take responsibility for the most vulnerable 1.5 million people. A second group of 10 million people, defined as less vulnerable but still socially isolated, have been left to the charity sector.
However, Harris mentions some positive changes during the period of COVID-19. For example, beyond the strongest, formalized charities local NGOs were given the opportunity to get involved in local crisis management; regulations have become flexible, which aided a faster and more flexible response, and assisted the involvement of more volunteers; significant financial support was provided by the government for charity organizations â though this was deemed insufficient. The huge number of volunteers were provided pivotal experience who in the first days of the pandemic could hardly be accommodated by the organizations. The importance of the role of local society and neighborhood networks, which often provided the first responses to local crises, has been demonstrated as well.
One might be hesitant to judge the last three countries by the criteria we have examined. The German and U.K. experiences show that the shift towards marketization, as a result of contract competition, professionalization (understood as new public management rules), and the fact that nonprofits are treated by the governments as if they were businesses or market players, have put CSOs at risk. In addition, in the case of Austria, the fear of government paternalism has arisen. These concerns suggest that the autonomy of the civil sector might be threatened by the market and by governmental paternalism. Further concerns could emerge in connection with participation and participatory decision-making, especially in case of Germany.
In South Korea, the study by Jeong and Kim in this issue shows that CSOâgovernment relations most comprehensively meet the requirements of autonomy, partnership and both forms of solidarity. As in the other countries, the whole society and civil sector have been adversely affected by the epidemic. NGOs have suffered huge losses, with 70% of non-profits having to terminate or reduce their programs, losing more than half of their revenue. Yet beleaguered South Korean organizations responded to the new conditions in a flexible manner. South Korea is one of the very few countries where there have been no closures, no curfews, and the economy, education and all other areas of life continued steadily during the pandemic. As well, South Korea is one of the most successful countries in controlling the spread of the epidemic, with one of the lowest death ratios and the highest number of tests done, mostly free of charge. The 3Ts (Test, Treatment, Tracking) strategy added another T: the Teamwork factor, which was the key to success in the COVID-19 response. From the outset, government strategy involved civil society, and many levels of collaboration and partnership in the design and implementation of decisions. Jeong and Kim found that Edwardsâ (2004) three images of civil society â as associational life, civility, and the public sphere â, were all successfully manifested during the response to COVID-19 in South Korea. Civil society was involved in more than just the defense against the pandemic, but it also prepared for the future even in the most difficult moments and exemplified outward solidarity. An unprecedented coalition of 530 NGOs formed a civil coalition to call for structural change on the public policy level by creating the Civil Society Counter-measure Committee to the COVID-19 Societal and Economic Crisis. The coalitionâs purpose is protecting the vulnerable part of the population by expanding the societal safety net and public health support, and by helping to make the economy more sustainable.
Community-based fundraisers were highly successful in raising a significant sum, which helped the disadvantaged population and those stuck in quarantine. As the authors aptly explained, in the fight against the epidemic, the government was not behaving like a âSingle-actor Play on Stage.â Instead the co-directors of government, private actors, citizens, and civil society were all involved. The South Korean government was thus able to make maximum use of the strength and resources of civil society and the civil sector. Meanwhile, the government enabled and empowered them â both with financial resources and partnership â to participate in the joint struggle in the most efficient way possible. South Korea offers commendable examples of inward and outward solidarity, where larger NGOs raised funds to help smaller, distressed organizations, and where significant cooperation at a national level has strengthened civil society advocacy.
The apparent success story in South Korea must be viewed with caution, given the unavoidable limitations of Jeong and Kimâs study. The data used in the study were exclusively derived from governmentâs or individual nonprofitsâ websites and their official announcements or press releases. The authors have acknowledged that these sources may be biased since the government and CSOs may showcase successful models and programs, and not report publicly on unsuccessful or failed attempts. Moreover, the data include only the official events appearing on these websites, their components and participants, their officially announced objectives; however, the study did not examine the actual interaction between the parties or their impact on the public policy process.
2 Closing Remarks
This essay examined CSOâgovernment relations in the time of COVID-19, introducing the articles and commentaries presented in this special issue of the Nonprofit Policy Forum. The analysis was developed to follow the concepts of autonomy, partnership, and solidarity, which are fundamental principles of the civil sector. In line with our expectations, the articles found that governmentâNGO relations did not show much deviation from pre-existing qualities and practices. This is consistent with Salamon and Anheierâs (1998) influential concept of âsocial originsâ which spotlights the civil sectorâs embeddedness in broader social, political, and economic realities. The crucial cleavage is between countries that are predominantly authoritarian and those with a predominantly democratic political system, which is also not surprising. The predominantly authoritarian political regimes were either at best unable to cooperate with their own civil societies, or CSOsâ activities were highly restricted, fully controlled and subjugated to state direction which deprived them of autonomy and participation. Sometimes governmental leaders even sought to prevent civilian solidarity actions or threatened CSOs and their members with criminal penalties. In these countries, governments behaved as âsingle actorsâ and failed to channel the potentials of civil society to help overcome the pandemic and alleviate its consequences.
The studies of this volume have shown that in an authoritarian polarized society, everything is over-politicized. Even the simplest issue has political significance because its critical edges may violate the hegemony of those in power. Therefore, in politically polarized societies, the plight of CSOs is very difficult. The article on Turkey reported that CSO representative interviewees viewed the high level of political polarization as a principal obstacle for their operations. As authors Dogan and Genc stated, they had to act very cautiously, and they tried to stay out of politics. Otherwise they were suppressed by the central government, their applications were delayed, their fundraising campaigns were declared illegal, and their usage of local government facilities was restricted, etc. Hungarian interviewees gave similar accounts and the empirical research indicated the risky nature of criticizing or publicly disagreeing with the governmental policies. It remains unclear whether highly polarized society leads to populist authoritarianism or that populist authoritarian policies deepen the cleavages in societies.
Most studies in this volume have, in some way, spoken on how the public space in which civilians can express their opinions without retaliation is narrowing. The studies from Israel, India, Austria, Hungary, and Turkey draw particular attention to this. Of course, government reactions are diverse, ranging from disapproval to deprivation of resources to deprivation of personal freedom.
However, the uplifting manifestations of solidarity and volunteering have shown that even in countries where public space for participation and outward solidarity is restricted, civil organizations have the courage and ingenuity to occupy âmetaspaceâ [7] , âa fluid form of public space. . .[with] different definitions and different ways of participating in itâ. Metaspace has the ability to hold simultaneously contradictory approaches and a âcontainer of knowledge-management processes, [for] the dynamic chaos in which we liveâ ( Bunschoten 2003 , 59). This is a highly political space, but not in the sense of party or state power-politics, though this space contains enormous amounts of power. This space is impermeable by those in authoritarian state-power because this is the space of resistance. The resistance is always present where there is power. As Foucault pointed out, power may form disciplined individuals, who are rational, productive subjects, yet that is in no way an expression of human nature. Furthermore, there is always at least some resistance to the imposition of any particular form of subjectivity, and thus resistance is concomitant with the process of subjectification. âAs soon as there is a power relation, there is the possibility of resistance.â ( Foucault 1978 , 95)
In countries with traditionally democratic regimes, although civil society - government relations can be endangered from many directions, the autonomy of civil society and NGOs is fundamentally guaranteed, and so is their place in participatory governance. Their efforts are recognized and they play an important role in society and in the formulation and implementation of its social policy, as well as in the improvement and daily practice of democratic values. The result is joint efforts to protect against the virus and to mitigate it social consequences. In these countries, albeit with some nuances, the government has supported CSOs, helping them to survive their distress and remain active, constructive participants.
However, experiences during Covid-19 also confirm that NGOs in developed democracies are faced with increasing retrenchment of the welfare state and neoliberal marketization. The shift towards marketization emerges from resource dependency, government-imposed conditions (Zimmer and Priller study in this issue), competition for contracts, compliance with market donors ( Eikenberry and Kluver 2004 ), and increasing entrerpreneurialism ( Sandberg, Elliott, and Petchel 2020 ) and has a serious impact on the civil sector. A few of the adverse effects of this are analyzed by Eikenberry and Kluver (2004) , Heying (1999) and others when they ask how nonprofit organizations will provide an alternative to the market if they behave like market actors. In the COVID-19 situation, government-nonprofits relations were determined by the formerâs strategy, which dealt with them as equivalents, as Zimmer and Priller report. Thus, the special characteristics of CSOs were not acknowledged, which would have justified a different treatment for them. If the government treats for-profit and non-profit NGOs the same, this will necessarily mean a further shift towards marketization and hybridization, which, according to Sanberg and her colleagues, in the context of nonprofits, is a âsituated processâ in that the meta-logic of neoliberalism â with its discourses of entrepreneurialism, prudentialism, and the technologies of performance and citizenship â interacts with and adapts to localized discourses to produce variation and thus unique entities that are still recognizable as marketized ( Sandberg, Elliott, and Petchel 2020 , 506).
Several studies in this issue (e.g. Harris, Zimmer and Priller) describe how civil society is split into formalized, professionalized, marketized large NGOs on the one hand, where voluntarism no longer has much, if any, room, and on the other hand, into grassroots civil organizations, volunteer groups and patterns of neighborhood networks. This divide, according to the authors, will deepen further during the post-COVID period. However, the crisis has made it clear that grassroots, local communities are more flexible and more responsive in case of an emergency.
Surprisingly, in some cases, the epidemic has had a positive impact on governmentâCSO relations. For example, because the situation following the pandemic spotlighted legal loopholes requiring clarification in Austria, it led to the formal recognition of the non-profit sector as such. The beneficial consequences of this will define the future relations of the actors. Similarly, the United Kingdom research finds that the government sees civil society as a serious partner in the aftermath of the pandemic. The question of whether the changes that have emerged during the epidemic will truly take hold, leading to a real structural revaluation of governmentâCSO relations, remains. Or will the aftermath take the form of a carnival, where everyone leaves their comfort zone for a while, but ultimately returns to their routines when the fantasy ends ( Baumann 2013 ).
I would like to conclude with some examples that show how creatively, and innovatively civil society has been able to respond to the crisis. We witnessed the proliferation of innovative forms of fundraising, the rapid spread and extensive innovative use of information technology, the explosion of volunteering, an unprecedented level of activity of the formalized civil society, and the revival and flourishing of local and neighborhood networks. We conceived new words and phrases that have become part of our everyday lives. We invented phrases like: âdigitally volunteeringâ, âonline guided toursâ, âquarantine concertsâ, âfood ingredient donationâ, âpaying a neighborâs billâ, âsharing volunteersâ, âdrive-through agricultural products marketplaceâ, âhot meal for everyoneâ and finally the âGrassroots Support for National Health System Staffâ. Surely there are more new terms to add to the list, but these and others found in the articles compiled here, illustrate the strength and ingenuity of CSOs and civil society, and their ability to cope with incredible challenges, like the pandemic, COVID-19.
Acknowledgements
I would like to express my gratitude and appreciation to Jon Van Til, my colleague and husband, for his tenacious support and assistance during the editing of this Special Issue.
Alves, M. A., and M. M. da Costa. 2020. âThe Collaboration between Governments and Civil Society Organizations in Response to Emergency Situations.â Brazilian Journal of Public Administration 54 (4): 923â35. 10.1590/0034-761220200168x Search in Google Scholar
Anheier, H. K., and G. Krlev. 2014. âWelfare Regimes, Policy Reforms, and Hybridity.â American Behavioral Scientist 58 (11): 1395â411. 10.1177/0002764214534669 Search in Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. 2013. Solidarity: A Word in Search of Flesh . https://www.eurozine.com/solidarity-a-word-in-search-of-flesh/ (accessed August 20, 2020). Search in Google Scholar
Boris, E., and R. Mosher-Williams. 1998. âNonprofit Advocacy Organizations: Assessing the Definitions, Classifications, and Data.â Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 27 (4): 488â506. 10.1177/0899764098274006 Search in Google Scholar
Bunschoten, R. 2003. âStirring Still: The City Soul and its Metaspaces.â Perspecta 34: 56â65. Search in Google Scholar
Chinnock, K. L., and L. M. Salamon. 2002. âDeterminants of Nonprofit Impact: A Preliminary Analysis.â In Paper presented at the panel session on âNonprofit Impacts: Evidence from Around the Globe,â Fifth International ISTR Conference . Cape Town, South Africa. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lester_Salamon/publication/242075314_Determinants_of_Nonprofit_Impact_A_Preliminary_Analysis/links/550214040cf231de076da258/Determinants-of-Nonprofit-Impact-A-Preliminary-Analysis.pdf (accessed August 12, 2020). Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, J. L., and A. Arato. 1997. Civil Society and Political Theory . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar
Daloz, J. P. 2009. âHow Political Representatives Earn Legitimacy: A Symbolic Approach.â International Social Science Journal 60: 285â96. 10.1111/j.1468-2451.2010.01715.x Search in Google Scholar
Dalton, R. J. 2007. A German Political and Economic System . http://www.socsci.uci.edu/âŒrdalton/germany/ch7/chap7.htm (accessed July 27, 2020). Search in Google Scholar
Della Porta, D. 2020. âBuilding Bridges: Social Movements and Civil Society in Times of Crisis.â Voluntas 31: 938â48. 10.1007/s11266-020-00199-5 Search in Google Scholar
Edwards, M. 2004. Civil Society . Polity Press in association with Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Search in Google Scholar
Edwards, M. 2009. Civil Society . Cambridge: Polity. Search in Google Scholar
Eikenberry, A. M., and J. D. Kluver. 2004. âThe Marketization of the Nonprofit Sector: Civil Society at Risk?â Public Administration Review 64 (2): 132â40. 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00355.x Search in Google Scholar
Farkas, Z. 2015. âA Hatalom ElfogadottsĂĄga Ăs LegitimitĂĄsa.â Szellem Ă©s TudomĂĄny 6 (1â2): 209â35. Search in Google Scholar
Foley, M. W., and B. Edwards. 1996. âThe Paradox of Civil Society.â Journal of Democracy 7 (3): 38â52. 10.1353/jod.1996.0048 Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1978. The History of Sexuality , Vol. 1. New York: Random House Inc. Search in Google Scholar
Gaventa, J. 2006. Triumph, Deficit or Contestation? Deepening the âDeepening Democracyâ Debate . IDS Working Paper. Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex Brighton. Search in Google Scholar
Gao, B. 2012. âTowards a Civil Society Based on Organic Solidarity: The Significance of Inter-organizational Cooperation for Chinese Society.â The China Nonprofit Review 4 (1): 87â110. 10.1163/18765149-12341239 Search in Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1998. The Third Way . Cambridge: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Search in Google Scholar
GrĂžnbjerg, K. A., and S. R. Smith. 2021. The Changing Dynamic of GovernmentâNonprofit Relationships . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108761291 Search in Google Scholar
Habib, A., and R. Taylor. 1999. âSouth Africa: Anti-apartheid NGOs in Transition.â Voluntas 10 (1): 73â82. 10.1023/A:1021495821397 Search in Google Scholar
Haque, S. M. 2002. âThe Changing Balance of Power between the Government and NGOs in Bangladesh.â International Political Science Review 23 (4): 411â35. 10.1177/0192512102023004006 Search in Google Scholar
Harris, M. 2018. âUK Civil Society: Changes and Challenges in the Age of New Public Governance and the Marketized Welfare State.â Nonprofit Policy Forum 8 (4): 351â68. 10.1515/npf-2017-0017 Search in Google Scholar
Heying, C. 1999. âAutonomy vs. Solidarity: Liberal, Totalitarian and Communitarian Traditions.â Administrative Theory & Praxis 21 (1): 39â50. 10.1080/10841806.1999.11643347 Search in Google Scholar
Jad, I. 2004. âThe NGO-Isation of Arab Womenâs Movements.â Institute of Development Studies Bulletin 35 (4): 34. 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2004.tb00153.x Search in Google Scholar
Kamat, S. 2003. âNGOs and the New Democracy.â Harvard International Review 25 (1): 65. Search in Google Scholar
Kamat, S. 2004. âThe Privatization of Public Interest: Theorizing NGO Discourse in a Neoliberal Era.â Review of International Political Economy 11 (1): 155â76. 10.1080/0969229042000179794 Search in Google Scholar
Kettl, D. F. 2000. âThe Transformation of Governance: Globalization, Devolution, and the Role of Government.â Public Administration Review 60 (6): 488â97. 10.1111/0033-3352.00112 Search in Google Scholar
Klein, S., and C.-S. Lee. 2019. âTowards a Dynamic Theory of Civil Society: The Politics of Forward and Backward Infiltration.â Sociological Theory 37 (1): 62â88. 10.1177/0735275119830451 Search in Google Scholar
Manji, F., and C. OâCoill. 2002. âThe Missionary Position: NGOs and Development in Africa.â International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) 78 (3) 567â83. 10.1111/1468-2346.00267 Search in Google Scholar
Mosley, J. E. 2010. âUnderstanding the Policy Advocacy Involvement of Human Service Nonprofits.â Social Service Review 84 (1): 57â76. 10.1086/652681 Search in Google Scholar
Mouffe, C. 2005. On the Political . New York, NY: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar
Najam, A. 2000. âThe Four-Câs of Third SectorâGovernment Relations. Cooperation, Confrontation, Complementarity, and Co-optation.â Nonprofit Management and Leadership 10 (4): 375â95. 10.1002/nml.10403 Search in Google Scholar
Pauly, R., F. De Rynck, and B. Verschuere. 2016. The Relationship between Government and Civil Society. A Neo-Gramscian Framework for Analysis . https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/8065871 (accessed November 12, 2020). Search in Google Scholar
Read, B. L. 2008. âAssessing Variation in Civil Society Organizations.â Comparative Political Studies 41 (9): 1240â65. 10.1177/0010414007302340 Search in Google Scholar
Rehg, W. 2007. âSolidarity and the Common Good: An Analytic Framework.â Journal of Social Philosophy 38 (1): 7â21. 10.1111/j.1467-9833.2007.00363.x Search in Google Scholar
Riley, D., and J. J. FernĂĄndez. 2014. âBeyond Strong and Weak: Rethinking Postdictatorship Civil Societies.â American Journal of Sociology 120 (2): 432â503. 10.1086/678272 Search in Google Scholar
Roy, A. 2014. The NGO-Ization of Resistance. http://massalijn.nl/new/the-ngo-ization-of-resistance/ (accessed December 10, 2019). 10.2307/j.ctv62hdw6.41 Search in Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M., and H. K. Anheier. 1998. âSocial Origins of Civil Society: Explaining the Nonprofit Sector Cross-Nationally.â Voluntas 9 (3): 213â48. 10.1023/A:1022058200985 Search in Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M., W. S. Sokolowski, and H. K. Anheier. 2000. Social Origins of Civil Society: An Overview . Working Papers of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project no. 38. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies. Search in Google Scholar
Sandberg, B., E. Elliott, and S. Petchel. 2020. âInvestigating the Marketization of the Nonprofit Sector: A Comparative Case Study of Two Nonprofit Organizations.â Voluntas 31: 494â510. 10.1007/s11266-019-00159-8 Search in Google Scholar
Simo, G., and A. L. Bies. 2007. âTh e Role of Nonprofits in Disaster Response: An Expanded Model of Cross-Sector Collaboration.â Public Administration Review 67 (1): 125â42. 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00821.x Search in Google Scholar
SĂžrvoll, J., and B. Bengtsson. 2019. Autonomy, Democracy and Solidarity. The Defining Principles of Collaborative Civil Society Housing and Some Mechanisms that May Challenge Them. Urban Research & Practice . https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330855416_Autonomy_democracy_and_solidarity_The_defining_principles_of_collaborative_civil_society_housing_and_some_mechanisms_that_may_challenge_them (accessed October 26, 2020). 10.1080/17535069.2019.1573267 Search in Google Scholar
Stigum Gleiss, M., and E. SĂŠther. 2017. Approaches to Civil Society in Authoritarian States: The Case of China . https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/61225/Revised+manuscript.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed March 15, 2020). Search in Google Scholar
Sunata, U., and S. Tosun. 2018. âAssessing the Civil Societyâs Role in Refugee Integration in Turkey: NGO-R as a New Typology.â Journal of Refugee Studies 32 (4): 683â703. 10.1093/jrs/fey047 Search in Google Scholar
Sutton, M., and R. F. Arnove. 2004. Civil Society or Shadow State? State/NGO Relations in Education . Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. Search in Google Scholar
Tocqueville, A. 2000. Democracy in America. Perennial Classics, Harper Perennial Modern Classics . Search in Google Scholar
Van Til, J. 1988. Mapping the Third Sector . New York: The Foundation Center. Search in Google Scholar
Van Til, J. 2000. Growing Civil Society from Nonprofit Sector to Third Space . Indianapolis, Indiana: Indiana University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Walzer, M. 1992. âThe Civil Society Argument.â In Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship , edited by C.Mouffe, 89â107. Community London: Verso. Search in Google Scholar
Walzer, M. 1998. âThe Concept of Civil Society.â In Toward a Global Civil Society , edited by M.Walzer, 7â28. New York: Berghahn Books. 10.2307/j.ctt1x76fjn.5 Search in Google Scholar
Xu, B. 2017. The Politics of Compassion: The Sichuan Earthquake and Civic Engagement in China . Stanford: Stanford University Press. 10.1515/9781503603400 Search in Google Scholar
Young, D. R. 2000. âAlternative Models of Government-Nonprofit Sector Relations: Theoretical and International Perspectives.â Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 29 (1): 149â72. 10.1177/0899764000291009 Search in Google Scholar
Young, D. R. 2006. âComplementary, Supplementary, or Adversarial? Nonprofit-Government Relations.â In Nonprofits & Governments. Collaboration & Conflict , edited by E. T. Boris, and C. E. Steuerle, 37â79. Washington D.C: The Urban Institute Press. Search in Google Scholar
Zimmer, A. 1999. âCorporatism RevisitedâThe Legacy of History and the German Nonprofit Sector.â Voluntas 10 (1): 37â49. 10.1023/A:1021439703650 Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Ăgnes KövĂ©r, published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- X / Twitter
Supplementary Materials
Please login or register with De Gruyter to order this product.
Journal and Issue
Articles in the same issue.
Home / Essay Samples / Social Issues / Corruption / The Importance of Politics Governance and Government
The Importance of Politics Governance and Government
- Category: Social Issues , Government
- Topic: Corruption , Global Governance , Political Corruption
Pages: 3 (1261 words)
- Downloads: -->
--> â ïž Remember: This essay was written and uploaded by an--> click here.
Found a great essay sample but want a unique one?
are ready to help you with your essay
You wonât be charged yet!
Democracy Essays
Public Transport Essays
Reign of Terror Essays
Police Brutality Essays
Ruby Bridges Essays
Related Essays
We are glad that you like it, but you cannot copy from our website. Just insert your email and this sample will be sent to you.
By clicking âSendâ, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.
Your essay sample has been sent.
In fact, there is a way to get an original essay! Turn to our writers and order a plagiarism-free paper.
samplius.com uses cookies to offer you the best service possible.By continuing weâll assume you board with our cookie policy .--> -->