assignment and nomination in law

• Key Differences

Know the Differences & Comparisons

Difference Between Nomination and Assignment

In the nomination, the property or amount secured by the policy remains at the disposal of the assured, till the time he/she is alive and the person appointed as the nominee is only for beneficial interest. On the other hand, in assignment the assets or policy amount passes to the assignee, as he/she gets the title or ownership and interest of the policy. Check out the given article to know the differences between nomination and assignment.

Content: Nomination Vs Assignment

Comparison chart.

Definition of Nomination

In Life Insurance, nomination can be understood as a facility, which allows the policyholder or say insured to nominate a person, who can claim the policy amount, in the event of death of policyholder. If, in case, a minor is appointed as nominee, then a major should be specified, in order to receive the money secured by the policy, upon the demise of the insured.

The policyholder can make nomination either at the time of purchasing the policy, or anytime before the expiry of the term. The policyholder is allowed to change the nomination, during the term of the policy, by making a fresh nomination, which should be incorporated, either through text in the policy or through an endorsement to the policy, to become effective.

When the policy matures while the insured is alive or when the nominee dies prior to the maturity of the policy, the policy amount is paid to the policyholder, or his/her legal heir or representative.

Definition of Assignment

Assignment, as the name suggest is the legal transfer of rights from the policyholder to the assignee to receive benefits indicated in the insurance agreement. It is usually made out of love and affection with the family members or for adequate consideration to any outside party.

The assignment can be made either through an endorsement upon the policy or separate instrument, duly signed by the assignor or his agent. The signature is required to be witnessed by at least one person competent to contract. It becomes effective from the date when the documents are received by the insurance company in proper order.

In general, space for endorsement is given in the policy document to enable the holder affix the assignment statement, along with reasons for the same.

The benefits in the policy arise as a result of survival and death benefits. All life insurance policies provide death benefits, but survival benefits are concerned with maturity benefits under the policy that involves a hidden investment component.

Key Differences Between Nomination and Assignment

The difference between nomination and assignment can be drawn clearly on the following grounds:

• The appointment of an individual by the assured to receive the amount secured by the policy, upon the demise of the assured is known as a nomination. On the other hand, assignment refers to cede the right, ownership, and interest in the policy to another person.
• In the nomination, there is no requirement of attestation by the witness. Conversely, attestation by at least one witness is required in case of assignment.
• In the nomination, there is no such thing like consideration. In contrast, the assignment can be with or without consideration.
• Nomination does not entitle nominee the right to sue under the policy. On the contrary, assignment entitles the assignee the right to sue under the policy.
• The nomination is made to help beneficiary recover the policy amount when it becomes due for payment. As against this, assignment aims at transferring all rights and interest in favor of the assignee.
• Nomination can be revoked or changed several times, whereas assignment can be canceled only one or two times during the policy term.
• The nomination is made in favor of immediate relatives. As opposed, assignment is made in favor of immediate relatives or to external party.

By and large, a nomination only accentuates the hands, to whom the policy amount is to be paid on the death of the assured, so that the insurance company gets the valid discharge of liabilities, as per the policy. Nevertheless, the amount can be claimed by the legal heirs of the policyholder.

The assignment is generally made by the policyholder out of love for the immediate relatives or even for certain consideration from an external party. Assignment without consideration to an external party is subject to detailed scrutiny, as it is seen as a possible way of money laundering.

You Might Also Like:

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Deed of Assignment or Deed of Novation: Key Differences and Legal Implications of Novation and Assignment Contracts

Novation and assignment stand out as pivotal processes for the transfer of contractual rights and obligations. These legal concepts allow a party to the contract to adapt to changing circumstances, ensuring that business arrangements remain relevant and effective. This article explores the nuances of novation and assignment, shedding light on their distinct legal implications, procedures, and practical applications. Whether you’re a business owner navigating the transfer of service contracts, or an individual looking to understand your rights and responsibilities in a contractual relationship, or a key stakeholder in a construction contract, this guide will equip you with the essential knowledge to navigate these complex legal processes.

Table of Contents

• What is a Deed of Novation? 
• What is a Deed of Assignment? 

Key Differences Between Novation and Assignment Deeds

Need a deed of novation or assignment key factors to consider, selecting the right assignment clause for your contract – helping you make the right choice, what is a deed of novation.

Novation is a legal process that allows a new party to a contract to take the place of an original party in a contract, thereby transferring both the responsibilities and benefits under the contract to a third party. In common law, transferring contractual obligations through novation requires the agreement of all original parties involved in the contract, as well as the new party. This is because novation effectively terminates the original contract and establishes a new one.

A novation clause typically specifies that a contract cannot be novated without the written consent of the current parties. The inclusion of such a clause aims to preclude the possibility of novation based on verbal consent or inferred from the actions of a continuing party. Nevertheless, courts will assess the actual events that transpired, and a novation clause may not always be enforceable. It’s possible for a novation clause to allow for future novation by one party acting alone to a party of their choosing. Courts will enforce a novation carried out in this manner if it is sanctioned by the correct interpretation of the original contract.

Novation is frequently encountered in business and contract law, offering a means for parties to transfer their contractual rights and duties to another, which can be useful if the original party cannot meet their obligations or wishes to transfer their contract rights. For novation to occur, there must be unanimous consent for the substitution of the new party for the original one, necessitating a three-way agreement among the original party, the new party, and the remaining contract party. Moreover, the novation agreement must be documented in writing and signed by all involved parties. Understanding novation is essential in the realms of contracts and business dealings, as it provides a way for parties to delegate their contractual rights and responsibilities while freeing themselves from the original agreement.

What is a Deed of Assignment?

A deed of assignment is a legal document that facilitates the transfer of a specific right or benefit from one party (the assignor) to another (the assignee). This process allows the assignee to step into the assignor’s position, taking over both the rights and obligations under the original contract. In construction, this might occur when a main contractor assigns rights under a subcontract to the employer, allowing the employer to enforce specific subcontractor duties directly if the contractor fails.

Key aspects of an assignment include:

• Continuation of the Original Contract: The initial agreement remains valid and enforceable, despite the transfer of rights or benefits.
• Assumption of Rights and Obligations: The assignee assumes the role of the assignor, adopting all associated rights and responsibilities as outlined in the original contract.
• Requirement for Written Form: The assignment must be documented in writing, signed by the assignor, and officially communicated to the obligor (the party obligated under the contract).
• Subject to Terms and Law: The ability to assign rights or benefits is governed by the specific terms of the contract and relevant legal statutes.

At common law, parties generally have the right to assign their contractual rights without needing consent from the other party involved in the contract. However, this does not apply if the rights are inherently personal or if the contract includes an assignment clause that restricts or modifies this general right. Many contracts contain a provision requiring the consent of the other party for an assignment to occur, ensuring that rights are not transferred without the other party’s knowledge.

Once an assignment of rights is made, the assignee gains the right to benefit from the contract and can initiate legal proceedings to enforce these rights. This enforcement can be done either independently or alongside the assignor, depending on whether the assignment is legal or equitable. It’s important to note that while rights under the contract can be assigned, the contractual obligations or burdens cannot be transferred in this manner. Therefore, the assignor remains liable for any obligations under the contract that are not yet fulfilled at the time of the assignment.

Choosing Between Assignment and Novation in a Construction Contract

Choosing between a deed of novation and an assignment agreement depends on the specific circumstances and objectives of the parties involved in a contract. Both options serve to transfer rights and obligations but in fundamentally different ways, each with its own legal implications, risks, and benefits. Understanding these differences and considering various factors can help in making an informed decision that aligns with your goals.

The choice between assignment and novation in a construction project scenario, where, for instance, an employer wishes to engage a subcontractor directly due to loss of confidence in the main contractor, hinges on several factors. These are:

• Nature of the Contract:  The type of contract you’re dealing with (e.g., service, sales) can influence which option is more suitable. For instance, novation might be preferred for service contracts where obligations are personal and specific to the original parties.
• Parties Involved: Consent is a key factor. Novation requires the agreement of all original and new parties, making it a viable option only when such consent is attainable. Assignment might be more feasible if obtaining consent from all parties poses a challenge.
• Complexity of the Transaction: For transactions involving multiple parties and obligations, novation could be more appropriate as it ensures a clean transfer of all rights and obligations. Assignment might leave the original party with ongoing responsibilities.
• Time and Cost: Consider the practical aspects, such as the time and financial cost associated with each option. Novation typically involves more complex legal processes and might be more time-consuming and costly than an assignment.

If the intention is merely to transfer the rights of the subcontractor’s work to the employer without altering the subcontractor’s obligations under a contract, an assignment might suffice. However, if the goal is to completely transfer the main contractor’s contractual role and obligations to the employer or another entity, novation would be necessary, ensuring that all parties consent to this new arrangement and the original contractor is released from their obligations.

The legal interpretations and court decisions highlight the importance of the document’s substance over its label. Even if a document is titled a “Deed of Assignment,” it could function as a novation if it transfers obligations and responsibilities and involves the consent of all parties. The key is to clearly understand and define the objective behind changing the contractual relationships and to use a deed — assignment or novation — that best achieves the desired legal and practical outcomes, ensuring the continuity and successful completion of the construction project.

Understanding the distinction between assignment deeds and novation deeds is crucial for anyone involved in contractual agreements. Novation offers a clean slate by transferring both rights and obligations to a new party, requiring the consent of all involved. Assignment, conversely, allows for the transfer of contractual benefits without altering the original contract’s obligations. Each method serves different strategic purposes, from simplifying transitions to preserving original contractual duties. The choice between novation and assignment hinges on specific legal, financial, and practical considerations unique to each situation. At PBL Law Group, we specialise in providing comprehensive legal advice and support in contract law. Our team is dedicated to helping clients understand their options and make informed decisions that align with their legal and business objectives. Let’s discuss!

Authored By Raea Khan

Director Lawyer, PBL Law Group

Find what you need

Share this article, book a 15-min consultation​, rated 5-star by our clients, latest insights & practical guides.

Guide to Owners Corporation Insurance Requirements in Strata Properties

For strata managers and owners corporations, insurance is a critical

Visitor Parking Spaces, Strata Parking Rules and Parking Levies in NSW

Parking in strata properties can be a complex and contentious

Proving Systemic Building Defects in Strata – The Owners v SPS Building Contractors

Systemic defects in strata buildings can be a hidden yet

Speak to us Now or Request a Consultation.

How can our expert lawyers help.

Property and strata disputes, building defects claims, setting up new Owners Corporations and more…

Construction & Building Law

Construction and building disputes, building defects, delays and claims, debt recovery and more…

International Estate Planning

Cross-border estate planning, international wills and trusts, tax-efficient wealth transfer strategies and more…

Commercial & Business Law

Starting and scaling your business, banking and business financing, bankruptcy and insolvency and more…

Planning & Environment Law

Environment and planning regulation, land and environment court disputes, sub-divisions and more…

Wills & Estates

Creating, updating and contesting wills, estate planning and administration, probate applications and more…

Get In Touch

Helpful links, site information, how we can help.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

Copyright © 2024 PBL Law Group. All Rights Reserved

Built by Commersion.Legal

Thank You For Your Request.

We’ve received your consultation request and will contact you within the next 24 hours (excluding weekends).

Primary tabs

Assignment is a legal term whereby an individual, the “assignor,” transfers rights, property, or other benefits to another known as the “ assignee .”   This concept is used in both contract and property law.  The term can refer to either the act of transfer or the rights /property/benefits being transferred.

Contract Law   

Under contract law, assignment of a contract is both: (1) an assignment of rights; and (2) a delegation of duties , in the absence of evidence otherwise.  For example, if A contracts with B to teach B guitar for $50, A can assign this contract to C.  That is, this assignment is both: (1) an assignment of A’s rights under the contract to the $50; and (2) a delegation of A’s duty to teach guitar to C.  In this example, A is both the “assignor” and the “delegee” who d elegates the duties to another (C), C is known as the “ obligor ” who must perform the obligations to the assignee , and B is the “ assignee ” who is owed duties and is liable to the “ obligor ”.

(1) Assignment of Rights/Duties Under Contract Law

There are a few notable rules regarding assignments under contract law.  First, if an individual has not yet secured the contract to perform duties to another, he/she cannot assign his/her future right to an assignee .  That is, if A has not yet contracted with B to teach B guitar, A cannot assign his/her rights to C.  Second, rights cannot be assigned when they materially change the obligor ’s duty and rights.  Third, the obligor can sue the assignee directly if the assignee does not pay him/her.  Following the previous example, this means that C ( obligor ) can sue B ( assignee ) if C teaches guitar to B, but B does not pay C $50 in return.

            (2) Delegation of Duties

If the promised performance requires a rare genius or skill, then the delegee cannot delegate it to the obligor.  It can only be delegated if the promised performance is more commonplace.  Further, an obligee can sue if the assignee does not perform.  However, the delegee is secondarily liable unless there has been an express release of the delegee.  That is, if B does want C to teach guitar but C refuses to, then B can sue C.  If C still refuses to perform, then B can compel A to fulfill the duties under secondary liability.

Lastly, a related concept is novation , which is when a new obligor substitutes and releases an old obligor.  If novation occurs, then the original obligor’s duties are wiped out. However, novation requires an original obligee’s consent .  

Property Law

Under property law, assignment typically arises in landlord-tenant situations.  For example, A might be renting from landlord B but wants to another party (C) to take over the property.   In this scenario, A might be able to choose between assigning and subleasing the property to C.  If assigning , A would be giving C the entire balance of the term, with no reversion to anyone whereas if subleasing , A would be giving C for a limited period of the remaining term.  Significantly, under assignment C would have privity of estate with the landlord while under a sublease, C would not. 

[Last updated in May of 2020 by the Wex Definitions Team ]

• business law
• landlord & tenant
• property & real estate law
• trusts, inheritances & estates
• wex definitions

• Submit Article for Publication

Nomination and Assignment under Insurance Contracts

Published by siri k reddy on 30/01/2021 30/01/2021, introduction:.

The term assignment itself means you assign something to someone else. In term life insurance, the assignment of the policy describes the action of assigning legal rights as well as policy ownership to someone else. The person who assigns the policy is known as an Assignor and the person who has been assigned the policy is known as an Assignee.

Nomination under the insurance contract refers to nominate someone on your behalf in order to collect the benefit in your absence. A person who is trustworthy can be nominated upon the death of a person. The trustworthy person could be from the dead person’s family or close friends. Then that person is the nominee of the policy.

However in most of the cases, people choose their family member as the nominee of the policy but as per the insurance act of 1938, under section 39, the nomination of a particular person is not restricted to a family only. Any person who is considered as trustworthy and any person who will not misuse the policy are considered to be an ideal nominee of that particular policy.

Types of Assignment

There are two types of assignment of policies:

• Absolute assignment: under this particular type of assignment, the assignor is bound to transfer the ownership, title, legal interests and all the rights of the policy to the assignee. This type of transfer of the policy does not include the terms and conditions on the part of the assignee. The exact purpose of the absolute assignment is to repay the debts or to show affection to loved ones.
• Collateral assignment: collateral assignment refers to that particular assignment in which the policyholder assigns the policy on terms and conditions, and the assignee is restricted to avail the benefits of all the terms and conditions. The main purpose of the collateral assignment is to repay loans and liabilities.

Types of Nomination

There are three types of nominations, such as:

• Beneficiary nominee: in this particular nomination a particular person can be made beneficiary to the immediate family members like parents, children, and spouse. The beneficiary will be entitled to receive all the benefits of the policy legally only in case of unfavourable conditions.
• Minor nominee: since it is considered that a minor cannot deal with financial conditions, the guardian of that particular minor has to give the details of their selves only when the policyholder chooses his/her child as the nominee.
• Non-family nominee: a non-family member is that person who does not have blood relation with the policyholder such as close friends, a distant relative, a neighbour, etc. under section 39 of the insurance act of 1938; any trustworthy person can be a policy nominee.

Nomination and Assignment in Life Insurance Plans

As it is already known that insurance is a legal contract between the insurance company who is also called the insurer and the policyholder. An assignee is a person to whom the rights have been transverse to. An example of an absolute assignment is as follows: Mr Bharath owns a life insurance policy of 1 crore and he wants to gift this particular policy to his wife as ‘absolute assignment’ to her name. Once this absolute assignment is made to his wife’s name, she will be the owner of the policy. She also has the right to transfer this policy to someone else.

An example of a conditional assignment is as follows: Ms Supriya owns a term insurance policy of 900,000. She wants a home loan of the same amount. Hence her banker asked her to assign the term policy in their name in order to get the loan.  If Supriya meets an untimely death the banker is entitled to enjoy their money. An assignment deed or deed of assignment [DOA] is that deed through which rights can be transferred from one person to another.

Sections and Policies

SECTION 38- ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSFER OF INSURANCE POLICIES

The provisions under section 38 of the Insurance Law Act, 2015. The provisions of this particular section are as follows:

• This policy allows itself to be transferred with or without consideration.
• An assignment has a high chance of being affected by an endorsement upon the policy or by a separate instrument to the insurer.
• The instruments should reflect the assignment and the reasons for the transfer.
• An authorized agent or the transferor should sign the assignment.
• The transferor of the assignment should not be operative against an insurer until prior notice is issued
• The authority has the right to specify the fees that is paid for the transfer
• The insurer is also expected to give a written acknowledgement of receipt of the notice. Such notice acts as evidence for the future.
•  The notices shall be delivered only at one place where the policy is being served in order to avoid confusions. This arrangement is made as the insurer is involved in managing more than one business place.
• The insurer has the right to accept or deny acting upon any transfer or endorsement only if it is not bonafide or not in the public interest.
• Before denying the endorsement, the insurer should make a note of the reasons for the same.

SECTION 39- NOMINATION BY POLICYHOLDER

The provisions of this particular section are as follows:

• The policyholder can nominate a person to whom money secured by the policy shall be paid during the death.
• When in case of a minor, the policyholder can appoint any person to receive the money in the event of policyholder’s death during the minority of the nominee.
• Nomination can be made at any time before the maturity of the policy.
• The nomination can be incorporated or endorsed to the insurer.
• The provisions of section 39 are not applicable to any life insurance policy to which section 6 of the Married Women’s Property Act, 1874 applies.
• If the nominee dies before the policyholder, the money is payable to the legal representatives or the holder of succession certificate.

SECTION 45- Policy shall not be called in question on the ground of misstatement after three years

Provisions of this section are as follow:

• Any policy of life insurance shall not be called in question after the expiry of three years from the date of issuance of the policy, the date of commencement of risk, the date of revival, the date rider coming to the policy.
• Silence is not considered to be fraud unless it depends on the circumstances of the case.
• The insurer can call for age proof at any time only if he is entitled.
• No insurer can reject a life insurance policy on the grounds of fraud if the beneficiary can prove that the fraud was true to the best of his knowledge.

Difference between Nomination and Assignment

Assignment of Policies- Impact on Existing Nomination

• According to section 39(4) of the insurance act, 938, the assignment of an insurance policy automatically cancels the nomination.
• Here are the few circumstances under which the assignment does not automatically cancel nomination :

When the policy loan is taken from the life insurer who issues the policy, the policy has to be assigned in favour of the life insurer. Under such circumstances, assignments in favour of the life insurer do not automatically cancel the nomination.

On the other hand, where the policy is assigned by a debtor to creditor acts as collateral security for the loan taken by the policyholder from the assignee.

The nomination and assignments have their own uses and benefits as a separate topic under the insurance contracts. I have gained in-depth knowledge of what exactly is nomination and assignment along with minute differences between them. The differences between them have helped me gain much more understanding of the topic. Nomination protects the interests of the insured and the insurer. Whereas the assignment strives to protect the interests of the assignee in availing all the benefits.

References:

• INSURANCE LAWS IN INDIA- VARDHAMAN MAHAVEER, pg. 32. 54.
• RAJIV JAIN: INSURANCE LAW AND PRACTICE, pg. 44
• https://m.economictimes.com/nomination-and-assignment/articleshow/3320189.cms
• https://accountlearning.com/difference-nomination-assignment/
• https://accountlearning.com/assignment-in-insurance-policy-meaning-explanation-types/
• https://life.futuregenerali.in/life-insurance-made-simple/life-insurance/change-nominee-in-term-insurance

Share this:

Leave a reply cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Related Posts

Common Law Principles

Utmost good faith under english insurance law.

Importance of “utmost” good faith is not to be ignored as it gives the doctrine a pillar of necessity to be followed in insurance contracts.

Case Law Analysis

Tukeshwari devi vs royal sundaram alliance insurance company ltd & ors.

The deceased Shashi Kumar Mahato was killed in an accident by an unnamed Omni van which was driven by the negligent driving.

Insurance Law

Hospital management and medical insurance laws.

Health is a part of the State List with each state retaining sole jurisdiction over the formulation of policies in this regard.

To join our WhatsApp community

Assignment Contract Law: Everything You Need to Know

Assignment contract law occurs when a party assigns their contractual rights to a third party. 3 min read updated on January 01, 2024

Assignment contract law occurs when a party assigns their contractual rights to a third party. The benefit that the issuing party would have received from the contract is now assigned to the third party. The party appointing their rights is referred to as the assignor, while the party obtaining the rights is the assignee.

Assignment Contract

In an assignment contract, the assignor prefers that the assignee reverses roles and assumes the contractual rights and obligations as stated in the contract. Before this can occur, all parties in the original contract must be notified. The obligor is the party that's culpable for carrying out the duties included in the contract.

To simplify the concept, the assignment contract is a second agreement created by the assignor that transfers the benefit from the obligor to the assignee. In other words, the benefit won't go to the assignor, but instead to the assignee. The assignment contract will most likely be the second agreement between the assignee and obligor, as it should be in addition to the original contract. Important detailed information should be included, such as: 

• Name of party members
• Rights to be appointed
• Other additional clauses

When Is Assignment Contract Needed?

Generally speaking, assignment contracts can be both written and oral. However, it is recommended that the contract is written in the following circumstances:

• Valuable services or property is involved
• The rights and duties being exchanged contain highly technical or complex terms
• The transfer of physical land or property is occurring
• There is no history between any of the parties involved
• If there is any future intention of assigning the responsibility of the contract to another business or person
• You're accepting contracts or responsibilities owned by a third party

Normally, the obligor doesn't need to be notified of an assignment of contract rights. However, the obligor is responsible for alerting the other parties if they plan on appointing another party to complete their duties or responsibilities.

What if an Assignment Contract Is Violated?

When an assignment contract is breached, the assignee may sue the obligor for a breach of contract or defective performance.

Determining specific liability may depend on the many components of the contract. To prevent confusion, it is recommended that  clauses are built into the assignment contract that identify the responsibilities and liabilities of all parties involved.

How Assignments Work

The specific language used in the contract will determine how the assignment plays out. For example, one contract may prohibit assignment, while another contract may require that all parties involved agree to it before proceeding. Remember, an assignment of contract does not necessarily alleviate an assignor from all liability. Many contracts include an assurance clause guaranteeing performance. In other words, the initial parties to the contract guarantee the assignee will achieve the desired goal.

When Assignments Will Not Be Enforced

The following situations indicate when an assignment of a contract is not enforced:

• The contract specifically prohibits assignment
• The assignment drastically changes the expected outcome
• The assignment is against public policy or illegal

Delegation vs. Assignment

Occasionally, one party in a contract will desire to pass on or delegate their responsibility to a third party without creating an assignment contract. Some duties are so specific in nature that they cannot be delegated. Adding a clause in the contract to prevent a party from delegating their responsibilities and duties is highly recommended.

Three Steps to Follow if You Want to Assign a Contract

There are three main steps to take if you're looking to assign a contract:

• Make sure the current contract does not contain an anti-assignment clause
• Officially execute the assignment by transferring the parties' obligations and rights
• Notify the obligor of the changes made

Once the obligor is notified, the assignor will effectively be relieved of liability.

Anti-Assignment Clauses

If you'd prefer not to allow the party you're doing business with to assign a contract, you may be able to prevent this from occurring by clearly stating anti-assignment clauses in the original contract. The three most common anti-assignment clauses are:

• Consent required for assignment
• Consent not needed for new owners or affiliates
• Consent not unreasonably withheld

Based on these three clauses, no party in the contract is allowed to delegate or assign any obligations or rights without prior written consent from the other parties. Any delegation or assignment in violation of this passage shall be deemed void. It is not possible to write an anti-assignment clause that goes against an assignment that is issued or ordered by a court.

If you need help with assignment contract law, you can  post your job  on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.

Hire the top business lawyers and save up to 60% on legal fees

Content Approved by UpCounsel

• Assignment of Rights and Obligations Under a Contract
• Legal Assignment
• Assignment Law
• Assignment of Rights Example
• Assignment Of Contracts
• What Is the Definition of Assigns
• Consent to Assignment
• Delegation vs Assignment
• Assignment Legal Definition
• Partial Assignment of Contract

• Skip to primary navigation
• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar
• Skip to footer

Parman & Easterday

Oklahoma Estate Planning Attorneys

Call Now: (405) 843-6100 | (918) 615-2700

What is an Assignment and Nominee Agreement?

August 13, 2020 by Courtesy of Parman and Easterday

What’s an “Assignment and Nominee” agreement and what does it do? Some attorneys use such an agreement as a belt and suspenders approach to funding.

by Steve Hartnett

Funding a trust is critical when you have a trust-based estate plan. A trust is a receptacle, like a box. Before you fund the trust, it’s like the box is empty.

You fund a trust by retitling assets into the name of the trust. Let’s say you have several items that you want in the trust. Let’s say you have items A, B, C, and D that you want to go to the trust. Let’s say you fund assets A, B, and C to the trust, but forget about item D. Maybe it’s an asset you don’t see frequently and it completely slipped your mind. Assets A, B, and C are in the trust and will avoid probate . Item D isn’t in the trust and will need to go through the probate process (assuming no non-probate transfer process applies to it, such as a beneficiary designation).

In some states, probate can be a costly and time-consuming undertaking, depending upon the nature and extent of the assets subject to probate. Typically, if it’s not real estate, a small amount of assets (which varies by state but typically is less than $100,000) can pass through probate using the express lane of “summary” proceedings where the formalities are loosened. In some states probate even above these levels isn’t as costly or time-consuming. It just depends upon your area.

But, if your trust is fully funded, the assets don’t need to go through the probate process. The Assignment and Nominee agreement is one way used by attorneys to fund the assets into the trust. Here’s how it works.

An Assignment and Nominee agreement has two parties, the “Trustee” and the “Trustor” (also known as the “Grantor” or “Settlor”). The Trustee is the person in charge of the trust assets. The Trustor is the person who sets up the trust. Sometimes they are the same person. In fact, most commonly they are the same person.

Let’s say Mike sets up a trust, so he’s the Trustor. He also names himself as the Trustee to manage the trust. So, he’s wearing both hats. With an Assignment and Nominee agreement, Mike as the Trustor assigns assets to the trust, thus transferring them to it. Then Mike, as the Trustee who manages the Trust, sends them back to Mike, in his individual capacity, (i.e. as Trustor), to hold the assets  for the trust  for safekeeping. So, even though the asset is back in Mike’s hands, it is owned by the trust and for the trust.

Typically, you’re going to transfer most items by some other method, such as changing titles on each asset directly. But when you’ve forgotten about an asset, the Assignment and Nominee agreement can be a belt and suspenders approach to move that forgotten asset into the trust.

The Assignment and Nominee agreement is not a panacea, rather it is a backup to traditional methods of transferring assets into the trust. Also, the agreement by its own terms doesn’t apply to some assets, such as retirement plan assets.

Funding a trust is essential. Otherwise, the trust is like an empty box. The Pour-Over Will might move the assets into the trust at death, but that would be through the probate process. Also, you would have lost any lifetime benefit of the trust, such as management of the assets during a period of incapacity.

An Assignment and Nominee agreement can act as a backstop on the important funding process.

Stephen C. Hartnett, J.D., LL.M. Director of Education American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys, Inc. 9444 Balboa Avenue, Suite 300 San Diego, California 92123 Phone: (858) 453-2128

• Recent Posts

• Courts Allowing More Flexible Trust Amendments - June 26, 2024
• The “Juice” and an Executor’s Duties - June 19, 2024
• The Purple Onion…an ode to Tangible Personal Property - June 12, 2024

The information on this Oklahoma Law Firm website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this or associated pages, documents, comments, answers, emails, or other communications should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Oklahoma City Estate Planning Attorneys at Parman & Easterday offer estate planning services in the Oklahoma City, Tulsa, Oklahoma and surrounding areas. Contact us for help today.

Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Disclaimer | Site Map | Powered by American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys

• Open navigation Close navigation
• Private Office
• Client Area

Expert Insights

Assignment, novation and construction contracts - What is your objective?

Consider a not too hypothetical situation where the parties to a construction project (employer, contractor and sub-contractor) enter into a Deed of Assignment intending that the employer, having lost confidence in the contractor, would directly engage the sub-contractor to complete the sub-contract works. But what if no assignment has taken place? What are the terms of the contract under which the sub-contractor carries out the works for the employer?

Potential risks with assignment

In construction projects, main contractors often assign the benefit of their key sub-contracts to the employer in the event of contractor default and consequent termination of the main contract. The employer can then enforce the rights in the sub-contract against the sub-contractor, including rectification of the works and the performance of particular obligations.

However, there are potential risks associated with assignment in these situations as the Technology and Construction Court’s decision in Energy Works (Hull) Ltd v MW High Tech Projects UK Ltd demonstrated. We discussed this decision in Assigning a sub-contract on termination: which rights is the contractor giving up? In this case, the nature of the assignment meant that the main contractor could not pursue claims made by the employer against its sub-contractor under the sub-contract. This limited the main contractor’s ability to ‘pass on’ any liability it had under the main contract to the sub-contractor.

But what if the Deed of Assignment does not take effect as an assignment?

Assignment v novation

Both assignment and novation are forms of transferring an interest under a contract from one party to another. However, they are very different and in their effect. An assignment transfers the benefit of a contract from one party to another, but only the benefit, not the burden. In contrast, a novation will transfer both the benefit and the burden of a contract from one party to another. A novation creates a new contractual relationship - a ‘new’ contract is entered into.

Another key difference with novation is that the consent of all parties concerned must be obtained, which is why novation is almost always effected through a tripartite agreement. In the case of an assignment, it is not always necessary to obtain consent, subject to what the specific terms of the contract provide.

When deciding whether to assign or novate, parties should consider (i) whether there is in fact a burden to novate, (ii) whether the novatee will be willing to take on the burden, (iii) whether all parties will consent to the novation and indeed enter into the agreement. If there is no burden under the contract to transfer, then an assignment is likely to be the most appropriate way to transfer the interests.

Is the Deed for an assignment or a novation?

Although a document may be labelled a Deed of Assignment, if it has references to the transfer of ‘ responsibilities and obligations ’ and is a tripartite agreement these are characteristic of a novation as opposed to an assignment.

A key issue in such circumstances is to ascertain whether making use of the words ‘ assigning ’ and ‘ assignment ’ actually affects the characteristics of the document.

There has been some consideration of this characterisation issue by the courts. In the case of Burdana v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust [2017] EWCA Civ 1980, by majority the Court of Appeal decided that on the facts of the case, although the Deed of Assignment in question referred to an ‘ assignment ’ of the benefit and burden, on proper analysis there was indeed a novation.

Furthermore, in the case of Langston Group Corporation v Cardiff City FC [2008] EWHC 535, Briggs J made it evident that even though the variation agreement in question did not use the word ‘ novation ’ and did not describe itself as such, the circumstances and effect of the agreement was indeed a novation and a new contract had been created.

It may be the case that even if a document does not describe itself as a novation, yet has the key characteristics of one, then as a matter of interpretation the courts would accept that the document takes effect as a novation.

Key characteristics of a novation

If entering into a document that purports to be a Deed of Assignment, tread carefully as it may well take effect as a novation, particularly if the following characteristics are present:

• It is a tripartite agreement;
• All the parties give their consent;
• The novator has been released from its obligations;
• There has been an acceptance of the terms of the novation on the part of the novatee and the substituted party; and
• There is a vesting of remedies.

What is your objective?

Although a document may well be labelled as an assignment, it may have the characteristics of and take effect as novation. Parties need to be cautious and consider what they want to achieve when assessing whether to assign rights or to novate them along with obligations.

This article was written by Anna Sowerby and Eveline Strecker. For more information, please contact Anna  or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact.

Our thinking

CTBUH Annual Conference: Mastering ESG Challenges and the Launch of the Global In-House Counsel Assembly

Kerry Stares

IBA Annual Conference 2024

Charlotte Ford

International Arbitration Conference 2024 conference

Thomas R. Snider

Supreme Court gives guidance on errors in statutory notices concerning property

Laura Bushaway

New UK listing rules: streamlined and simplified

Victoria Younghusband

Molly-Mae'd to Last? Exploring the legal balance of Love Island's power couple upon separation

James Elliott-Hughes

Quick Reads

Charles Russell Speechlys advises Hudl UK, Limited on its acquisition of StatsBomb Services Limited

Keir Gordon

Injunctions to remove Directors from office in s994 petitions

Claudine Morgan

City AM quotes Keir Gordon on more law firms becoming increasingly interested in sport

In the Press

Pub Regulars Run Out of Stream as Scottish Court of Session Bars Pub’s Display of English and Scottish Premier League Matches

Daniel McDonagh

Real Swifties help Food Banks

Neeva Desai

BBC News quotes Jamie Cartwright on a wrongful death lawsuit relating to a severe allergic reaction at Disney World

Jamie Cartwright

Love Don’t Cost A Thing...Or Does It?

Emily Borrowdale

Italian Lump Sum Tax Regime: From €100,000 to €200,000, but only for new joiners

Nicola Saccardo

Illegal to divorce in the Philippines - is this about to change and how does England recognise overseas divorces?

Charlotte Posnansky

Default interest rates in loan agreements – penalty or legitimate interest?

James Walton

The Lawyer quotes Simon Ridpath on our Firm's strategy looking ahead to 2028

Simon Ridpath

Carrots and sticks - the key to combating climate change

National Planning Policy Framework changes - Concrete ideas on decarbonising house-building

Charles Russell Speechlys successful for the Jockey Club of Saudi Arabia in landmark doping case

Danielle Sharkey

• 1800 102 2355
• Download the APP
• 1800 102 2355 [9:30AM-6:30PM]
• Branch Locator
• Customer Portal Login
• Advisor Portal Login

What is Assignment and Nomination in Life Insurance?

‘Assignment’ and ‘Nomination’ are two most common terms used in a life insurance policy document. Let us understand the importance of these two terms in-detail.

By Future Generali. Updated On Oct 06, 2022

Your life insurance policy is a contract between you (insured) and the insurance company (insurer). The contract is filled with jargon. To the extent possible, we must understand all the terms mentioned in the policy bond (certificate). ‘Assignment’ and ‘Nomination’ are two most common terms used in the insurance world.

For instance, in the event that you plan to apply for a home loan, your home loan provider will surely use these terms. Hence, it is best to be sure and understand exactly what the terms mean before you make a decision to buy the policy.

What is assignment in life insurance?

A life insurance policy can be assigned when rights of one person are transferred to another. The rights to your insurance policy can be transferred to someone else for various reasons. The process is known as assignment.

An “assignor” (policyholder) is the person who assigns the insurance policy. An “assignee” is the person to whom the policy rights have been transferred, i.e. the person to whom the policy has been assigned.

In the event rights are transferred from an Assignor to an Assignee, the rights of the policyholder are canceled, and the Assignee becomes the owner of the insurance policy.

People often assign their life insurance policies to banks. A bank becomes the policy owner in this case, while the original policyholder continues to be the life assured whose death may be claimed by either the bank or the policy owner.

Types of Assignment

There are two ways to assign an insurance policy. They are as follows:

1. Absolute Assignment

During this process, the rights of the assignor (policyholder) will be completely transferred to the assignee (person to whom the policy rights have been transferred). It is not subject to any conditions.

As an example, Mr. Rajiv Tripathi owns a Rs 1 Crore life insurance policy. Mr. Tripathi wants to gift his wife this policy. Specifically, he wants to make “absolute assignment” of the policy in his wife's name, so that the death benefit (or maturity proceeds) can be paid directly to her. After the absolute assignment has been made, Mrs. Tripathi will own this policy, and she will be able to transfer it to someone else again.

2. Conditional Assignment

As part of this type of assignment, certain conditions must be met before the transfer of rights occurs from the Assignor to the Assignee. The Policy will only be transferred to the Assignee if all conditions are met.

For instance, a term insurance policy of Rs 50 Lakh is owned by Mr. Dinesh Pujari. Mr. Pujari is applying for a home loan of Rs 50 Lakh. For the loan, the banker asked him to assign the term policy in their name. To acquire a home loan, Mr. Pujari can assign the insurance policy to the home loan company. In the event of Mr. Pujari’s death (during the loan tenure), the bank can collect the death benefit and get their money back from the insurance company.

Mr. Pujari can get back his term insurance policy if he repays the entire amount of his home loan. As soon as the loan is repaid, the policy will be transferred to Mr. Pujari.

In the event that the insurer receives a death benefit that exceeds the outstanding loan balance, the bank will be paid from the difference between the death benefit and the loan and the balance will be paid directly to the nominee. In the above example, the remaining amount (if any) will be paid to Mr. Pujari’s beneficiaries (legal heirs/nominee).

Key Points to know Note About Assignment

In regards to the assignment, the following points should be noted:

• A policy assignment transfers/changes only the ownership, not the risk associated with it. The person assured thus becomes the insured.
• The assignment may lead to cancellation of the nomination in the policy only when it is done in favour of the insurance company due to a policy loan.
• Assignment for all insurance plans except for the pension plan and the Married Women's Property Act (MWP), can be done.
• A policy contract endorsement is required to effect the assignment.

What is nomination in life insurance?

Upon the death of the life assured, the nominee/ beneficiary (generally a close relative) receives the benefits. Policyholders appoint nominees to receive benefits. Under the Insurance Act, 1938, Section 39 governs the nomination process.

Types of Nominees

In a life insurance policy, the policyholder names someone who will receive the benefits in the event of the life assured's death. Here are a few types of nominees:

1. Beneficial Nominees

In accordance with the law, the beneficiary of the claimed benefits will be any immediate family member nominated by the policyholder (like a spouse, children, or parents). Beneficiary nominees are limited to immediate family members of the beneficiary.

2. Minor Nominees

It is common for individuals to name their children as beneficiaries of their life insurance policies. Minor nominees (under the age of 18) are not allowed to handle claim amounts. Hence, the policyholder needs to designate a custodian or appointee. Payments are made to the appointee until the minor reaches the age of 18.

3. Non-family Nominees

Nominees can include distant relatives or even friends as beneficiaries of a life insurance policy.

4. Changing Nominees

It is okay for policyholders to change their nominees as often as they wish, but the latest nominee should take priority over all previous ones.

Key Points to Note About Nomination

In regards to the nomination, the following points should be noted:

• In order to nominate, the policyholder and life assured must be the same.
• In the case of a different policyholder and life assured, the claim benefits will be paid to the policyholder.
• Nominations cannot be changed or modified.
• The policy can have more than one nominee.
• As part of successive nominations, if the life assured appoints person “A” as the first person to receive benefits. Now, in the event of the life assured’s death after person “A” dies, the claim benefits will be given to person “B”. The benefits will be available to Nominee “C” if Nominee “A” and Nominee “B” have passed away.

What is the difference between nomination and assignment?

Let's talk about the differences between assignment and nomination.

Nomination and Assignment serve different purposes. The nomination protects the interests of the insured as well as an insurer in offering claim benefits under the life insurance policy. On the other hand, assignment protects the interests of an assignee in availing the monetary benefits under the policy. The policyholder should be aware of both of them before buying life insurance.

Connect with our trusted financial advisors right away!

Fill in below details to get a call back

One of our associate will connect with you soon.

Latest Articles

Life Insurance 4 min What is Investment? A Complete guide to start your investment journey.

By Future Generali. Dec 06, 2023

Life Insurance 5 min Endowment Policy: Returns, Benefits & Requirement

By Future Generali. Sep 06, 2023

Life Insurance 4 min Understanding Sum Assured: Significance & Calculation

By Future Generali. Jul 28, 2023

Couldn't find what you are looking for? TRY SEARCH

ARN No.: Comp-April-2022_534.

Assignment under Insurance Policies

By J Mandakini, NUALS

Editor’s Note: This paper attempts to explore the concept of assignment under Indian law especially Contract Act, Insurance Act and Transfer of Property Act. It seeks to appreciate why the assignment is made use of for securities of a facility sanctioned by ICICI Bank. Also, it explains how ICICI Bank faces certain problems in executing the same. 

INTRODUCTION

For any facility sanctioned by a lender, collateral is always deposited to secure the same. Such mere deposition will not suffice, the borrower has to explicitly permit the lender to recover from the borrower, such securities in case of his default.

This is done by the concept of assignment, dealt with adequately in Indian law. Assignment of obligations is always a tricky matter and needs to be dealt with carefully. The Bank should not fall short of any legally permitted lengths to ensure the same. This is why ambiguity in its security documents have to be rectified. 

This paper attempts to explore the concept of assignment in contract law. It seeks to appreciate why the assignment is made use of for securities of a facility sanctioned by ICICI Bank. The next section will deal with how ICICI Bank faces certain problems in executing the same. The following sections will talk about possible risks involved, as well as defenses and solutions to the same.

WHAT IS ASSIGNMENT?

Assignment refers to the transfer of certain or all (depending on the agreement) rights to another party. The party which transfers its rights is called an assignor, and the party to whom such rights are transferred is called an assignee. Assignment only takes place after the original contract has been made. As a general rule, assignment of rights and benefits under a contract may be done freely, but the assignment of liabilities and obligations may not be done without the consent of the original contracting party.

The liability on a contract cannot be transferred so as to discharge the person or estate of the original contractor unless the creditor agrees to accept the liability of another person instead of the first. [i]

Illustration

P agrees to sell his car to Q for Rs. 100. P assigns the right to receive the Rs. 100 to S. This may be done without the consent of Q. This is because Q is receiving his car, and it does not particularly matter to him, to whom the Rs. 100 is being handed as long as he is being absolved of his liability under the contract. However, notice may still be required to be given. Without such notice, Q would pay P, in spite of the fact that such right has been assigned to S. S would be a sufferer in such case.

In this case, that condition is being fulfilled since P has assigned his right to S. However, P may not assign S to be the seller. P cannot just transfer his duties under the contract to another. This is because Q has no guarantee as to the condition of S’s car. P entered into the contract with Q on the basis of the merits of P’s car, or any other personal qualifications of P. Such assignment may be done with the consent of all three parties – P, Q, S, and by doing this, P is absolved of his liabilities under the contract.

 1.1. Effect of Assignment

Immediately on the execution of an assignment of an insurance policy, the assignor forgoes all his rights, title and interest in the policy to the assignee. The premium or loan interest notices etc. in such cases will be sent to the assignee. [ii] However, the existence of obligations must not be assumed, when it comes to the assignment. It must be accompanied by evidence of the same. The party asserting such a personal obligation must prove the existence of an express assumption by clear and unequivocal proof. [iii]

 Assignment of a contract to a third party destroys the privity of contract between the initial contracting parties. New privity is created between the assignee and the original contracting party. In the illustration mentioned above, the original contracting parties were P and Q. After the assignment, the new contracting parties are Q and S.

 1.2. Revocation of Assignment

Assignment, once validly executed, can neither be revoked nor canceled at the option of the assignor. To do so, the insurance policy will have to be reassigned to the original assignor (the insured).

 1.3. Exceptions to Assignment

There are some instances where the contract cannot be assigned to another.

• Express provisions in the contract as to its non-assignability – Some contracts may include a specific clause prohibiting assignment. If that is so, then such a contract cannot be assigned. Assignability is the rule and the contrary is an exception. [iv]

Pensions, PFs, military benefits etc. Illustration

 1.4. enforcing a contract of assignment.

From the day on which notice is given to the insurer, the assignee becomes the beneficiary of the policy even though the assignment is not registered immediately. It does not wait until the giving of notice of the transfer to the insurer. [vi] However, no claims may lie against the insurer until and unless notice of such assignment is delivered to the insurer.

If notice of assignment is not provided to the obligor, he is discharged if he pays to the assignor. Assignee would have to recover from the assignor. However, if the obligor pays the assignor in spite of the notice provided to him, he would still be liable to the assignee.

The following two illustrations make the point amply clear:

Illustrations

1. Seller A assigns its right to payment from buyer X to bank B. Neither A nor B gives notice to X. When payment is due, X pays A. This payment is fully valid and X is discharged. It will be up to B to recover it from A

2. Seller A assigns to bank B its right to payment from buyer X. B immediately gives notice of the assignment to X. When payment is due, X still pays A. X is not discharged and B is entitled to oblige X to pay a second time.

An assignee doesn’t stand in better shoes than those of his assignor. Thus, if there is any breach of contract by the obligor to the assignee, the latter can recover from the former only the same amount as restricted by counter claims, set offs or liens of the assignor to the obligor.

The acknowledgment of notice of assignment is conclusive proof of, and evidence enough to entertain a suit against an assignor and the insurer respectively who haven’t honoured the contract of assignment.

1.5. Assignment under various laws in India

There is no separate law in India which deals with the concept of assignment. Instead, several laws have codified it under different laws. Some of them have been discussed as follows:

1.5.1. Under the Indian Contract Act

There is no express provision for the assignment of contracts under the Indian Contract Act. Section 37 of the Act provides for the duty of parties of a contract to honour such contract (unless the need for the same has been done away with). This is how the Act attempts to introduce the concept of assignment into Indian commercial law. It lays down a general responsibility on the “representatives” of any parties to a contract that may have expired before the completion of the contract. (Illustrations to Section 37 in the Act).

An exception to this may be found from the contract, e.g. contracts of a personal nature. Representatives of a deceased party to a contract cannot claim privity to that contract while refusing to honour such contract. Under this Section, “representatives” would also include within its ambit, transferees and assignees. [vii]

Section 41 of the Indian Contract Act applies to cases where a contract is performed by a third party and not the original parties to the contract. It applies to cases of assignment. [viii] A promisee accepting performance of the promise from a third person cannot afterwards enforce it against the promisor. [ix] He cannot attain double satisfaction of its claim, i.e., from the promisor as well as the third party which performed the contract. An essential condition for the invocation of this Section is that there must be actual performance of the contract and not of a substituted promise.

  1.5.2. Under the Insurance Act

The creation of assignment of life insurance policies is provided for, under Section 38 of the Insurance Act, 1938.

• When the insurer receives the endorsement or notice, the fact of assignment shall be recorded with all details (date of receipt of notice – also used to prioritise simultaneous claims, the name of assignee etc). Upon request, and for a fee of an amount not exceeding Re. 1, the insurer shall grant a written acknowledgment of the receipt of such assignment, thereby conclusively proving the fact of his receipt of the notice or endorsement. Now, the insurer shall recognize only the assignee as the legally valid party entitled to the insurance policy.

 1.5.3. Under the Transfer of Property Act

Indian law as to assignment of life policies before the Insurance Act, 1938 was governed by Sections 130, 131, 132 and 135 of the Transfer of Property Act 1882 under Chapter VIII of the Act – Of Transfers of Actionable Claims. Section 130 of the Transfer of Property Act states that nothing contained in that Section is to affect Section 38 of the Insurance Act.

 I) Section 130 of the Transfer of Property Act

An actionable claim may be transferred only by fulfilling the following steps:

• Signed by a transferor (or his authorized agent)

The transfer will be complete and effectual as soon as such an instrument is executed. No particular form or language has been prescribed for the transfer. It does not depend on giving notice to the debtor.

The proviso in the section protects a debtor (or other person), who, without knowledge of the transfer pays his creditor instead of the assignee. As long as such payment was without knowledge of the transfer, such payment will be a valid discharge against the transferee. When the transfer of any actionable claim is validly complete, all rights and remedies of transferor would vest now in the transferee. Existence of an instrument in writing is a sine qua non of a valid transfer of an actionable claim. [x]

 II) Section 131 of the Transfer Of Property Act

This Section requires the notice of transfer of actionable claim, as sent to the debtor, to be signed by the transferor (or by his authorized agent), and if he refuses to sign it, a signature by the transferee (or by his authorized agent). Such notice must state both the name and address of the transferee. This Section is intended to protect the transferee, to receive from the debtor. The transfer does not bind a debtor unless the transferor (or transferee, if transferor refuses) sends him an express notice, in accordance with the provisions of this Section.

III) Section 132 of the Transfer Of Property Act

This Section addresses the issue as to who should undertake the obligations under the transfer, i.e., who will discharge the liabilities of the transferor when the transfer has been made complete – would it be the transferor himself or the transferee, to whom the rest of the surviving contract, so to speak, has been transferred.

This Section stipulates, that the transferee himself would fulfill such obligations. However, where an actionable claim is transferred with the stipulation in the contract that transferor himself should discharge the liability, then such a provision in the contract will supersede Ss 130 and 132 of this Act. Where the insured hypothecates his life insurance policies and stipulates that he himself would pay the premiums, the transferee is not bound to pay the premiums. [xi]

FACILITIES SECURED BY INSURANCE POLICIES – HOW ASSIGNMENT COMES INTO THE PICTURE

Many banks require the borrower to take out or deposit an insurance policy as security when they request a personal loan or a business loan from that institution. The policy is used as a way of securing the loan, ensuring that the bank will have the facility repaid in the event of either the borrower’s death or his deviations from the terms of the facility agreement.

Along with the deposit of the insurance policy, the policyholder will also have to assign the benefits of the policy to the financial institution from which he proposes to avail a facility. The mere deposit, without writing, or passing of any document of title to such a claim, does not create any equitable charge. [xii]

ETHICS OF ASSIGNING LIFE INSURANCE POLICY TO LENDERS

The purpose of taking out a life insurance policy on oneself, is that in the event of an untimely death, near and dear ones of the deceased are not left high and dry, and that they would have something to fall back on during such traumatic times. Depositing and assigning the rights under such policy document to another, would mean that there is a high chance that benefits of life insurance would vest in such other, in the event of unfortunate death and the family members are prioritized only second. These are not desirable circumstances where the family would be forced to cope with the death of their loved one coupled with the financial crisis.

 Thus, there is a need to examine the ethics of:

• The bank accepting such assignment

The customer should be cautious before assigning his rights under life insurance policies. By “cautious”, it is only meant that he and his dependents and/or legal heirs should be aware of the repercussions of the act of assigning his life insurance policy. It is conceded that no law prohibits the assignment of life insurance policies.

In fact, Section 38 of the Insurance Act, 1938 , provides for such assignments. Judicial cases have held life insurance policies as property more than a social welfare measure. [xiii] Further, the bank has no personal relationship with any customer and thus has no moral obligation to not accept such assignments of life insurance.

However, the writer is of the opinion that, in dealing with the assignment of life insurance policies, utmost care and caution must be taken by the insured when assigning his life insurance policy to anyone else.

CURRENT STAND OF ICICI REGARDING FACILITIES SECURED BY INSURANCE POLICY, WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO ASSIGNMENT OF OBLIGATIONS

This Section seeks to address and highlight the manner in which ICICI Bank drafts its security documents with regard to the assignment of obligations. The texts placed in quotes in the subsequent paragraphs are verbatim extracts from the security document as mentioned.

Composite Document for Corporate and Realty Funding

 “ 8 .   CHARGING CLAUSE

  The Mortgagor doth hereby:

iii) Assign and transfer unto the Mortgagee all the Bank Accounts and all rights, title, interest, benefits, claims and demands whatsoever of the Mortgagor in, to, under and in respect of the Bank Accounts and all monies including all cash flows and receivables and all proceeds arising from Projects and Other Projects_______________, insurance proceeds, which have been deposited / credited / lying in the Bank Accounts, all records, investments, assets, instruments and securities which represent all amounts in the Bank Accounts, both present and future (the “Account Assets”, which expression shall, as the context may permit or require, mean any or each of such Account Assets) to have and hold the same unto and to the use of the Mortgagee absolutely and subject to the powers and provisions herein contained and subject also to the proviso for redemption hereinafter mentioned;

(v) Assign and transfer unto the Mortgagee all right, title, interest, benefit, claims and demands whatsoever of the Mortgagors, in, to, under and/or in respect of the Project Documents (including insurance policies) including, without limitation, the right to compel performance thereunder, and to substitute, or to be substituted for, the Mortgagor thereunder, and to commence and conduct either in the name of the Mortgagor or in their own names or otherwise any proceedings against any persons in respect of any breach of, the Project Documents and, including without limitation, rights and benefits to all amounts owing to, or received by, the Mortgagor and all claims thereunder and all other claims of the Mortgagor under or in any proceedings against all or any such persons and together with the right to further assign any of the Project Documents, both present and future, to have and to hold all and singular the aforesaid assets, rights, properties, etc. unto and to the use of the Mortgagee absolutely and subject to the powers and provisions contained herein and subject also to the proviso for redemption hereinafter mentioned.”

 ICICI Bank’s Standard Terms and Conditions Governing Consumer Durable Loans

  “ insurance.

The Borrower further agrees that upon any monies becoming due under the policy, the same shall be paid by the Insurance Company to ICICI Bank without any reference / notice to the Borrower, but not exceeding the principal amount outstanding under the Insurance Policy. The Borrower specifically acknowledges that in all cases of claim, the Insurance Company will be solely liable for settlement of the claim, and he/she will not hold ICICI Bank responsible in any manner whether for compensation, recovery of compensation, processing of claims or for any reason whatsoever.

Reference has been made only to assignment of assets, rights, benefits, interests, properties etc. No specific reference has been made to the assignment of obligations of the assignor under such insurance contract.

THE ISSUE FACED BY ICICI BANK

Where ICICI Bank accepts insurance policy documents of customers as security for a loan, in the light of the fact that the documents are silent about the question of assignment of obligations, are they assigned to ICICI Bank? Where there is hypothecation of a life insurance policy, with a stipulation that the mortgagor (assignor) should pay the premiums, and that the mortgagee (assignee) is not bound to pay the same, Sections 130 and 132 do not apply to such cases. [xiv] With rectification of this issue, ICICI Bank can concretize its hold over the securities with no reservations about its legality.

RISKS INVOLVED

This section of the paper attempts to explore the many risks that ICICI Bank is exposed to, or other factors which worsen the situation, due to the omission of a clause detailing the assignment of obligations by ICICI Bank.

Practices of Other Companies

The practices of other companies could be a risk factor for ICICI Bank in the light of the fact that some of them expressly exclude assignment of obligations in their security documents.

There are some companies whose notice of assignment forms contain an exclusive clause dealing with the assignment of obligations. It states that while rights and benefits accruing out of the insurance policy are to be assigned to the bank, obligations which arise out of such policy documents will not be liable to be performed by the bank. Thus, they explicitly provide for the only assignment of rights and benefits and never the assignment of obligations.

Possible Obligation to Insurance Companies

By not clearing up this issue, ICICI Bank could be held to be obligated to the insurance company from whom the assignor took the policy, for example, with respect to insurance premiums which were required to be paid by the assignor. This is not a desirable scenario for ICICI Bank. In case of default by the assignor in the terms of the contract, the right of ICICI Bank over the security deposited (insurance policy in question) could be fraught in the legal dispute.

Possible litigation

Numerous suits may be instituted against ICICI Bank alleging a violation of the Indian Contract Act. Some examples include allegations of concealment of fact, fraud etc. These could be enough to render the existing contract of assignment voidable or even void.

Contra Proferentem

This doctrine applies in a situation when a provision in the contract can be interpreted in more than one way, thereby creating ambiguities. It attempts to provide a solution to interpreting vague terms by laying down, that a party which drafts and imposes an ambiguous term should not benefit from that ambiguity. Where there is any doubt or ambiguity in the words of an exclusion clause, the words are construed more forcibly against the party putting forth the document, and in favour of the other party. [xv]

The doctrine of contra proferentem attempts to protect the layman from the legally knowledgeable companies which draft standard forms of contracts, in which the former stands on a much weaker footing with regard to bargaining power with the latter. This doctrine has been used in interpreting insurance contracts in India. [xvi]

If litigation ensues as a result of this uncertainty, there are high chances that the Courts will tend to favour the assignor and not the drafter of the documents.

POSSIBLE DEFENSES AGAINST DISPUTES FOR THE SECURITY DOCUMENTS AS THEY ARE NOW

This section of the paper attempts to give defences which the Bank may raise in case of any disputes arising out of silence on the matter of assignability of obligations.

Interpretation of the Security Documents

UNIDROIT principles expressly provide a method for interpretation of contracts. [xvii] The method consists of utilizing the following factors:

This defence relates to the concept of estoppel embodied in Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. According to the Section, when one person has, by his declaration, act or omission, intentionally caused or permitted another person to believe a thing to be true and to act upon such belief, neither he nor his representative shall be allowed, in any suit or proceeding between himself and such person or his representatives, to deny the truth of that thing.

If a man either by words or by conduct has intimated that he consents to an act which has been done and that he will not offer any opposition to it, and he thereby induces others to do that which they otherwise might have abstained from, he cannot question legality of the act he had sanctioned to the prejudice of those who have so given faith to his words or to the fair inference to be drawn from his conduct. [xviii] Subsequent conduct may be relevant to show that the contract exists, or to show variation in the terms of the contract, or waiver, or estoppel. [xix]

Where the meaning of the instrument is ambiguous, a statement subsequently interpreting such instrument is admissible. [xx] In the present case, where the borrower has never raised any claims with regard to non assignability of obligations on him, and has consented to the present conditions and relations with ICICI Bank, he cannot he cannot be allowed to raise any claims with respect to the same.

Internationally, the doctrine of post contractual conduct is invoked for such disputes. It refers to the acts of parties to a contract after the commencement of the contract. It stipulates that where a party has behaved in a particular manner, so as to induce the other party to discharge its obligations, even if there has been a variation from the terms of the contract, the first party cannot cite such variation as a reason for its breach of the contract.

Where the parties to a contract are both under a common mistake as to the meaning or effect of it, and therefore embark on a course of dealing on the footing of that mistake, thereby replacing the original terms of the contract by a conventional basis on which they both conduct their affairs, then the original contract is replaced by the conventional basis. The parties are bound by the conventional basis. Either party can sue or be sued upon it just as if it had been expressly agreed between them. [xxi]

The importance of consensus ad idem has been concretized by various case laws in India. Further, if the stipulations and terms are uncertain and the parties are not ad idem there can be no specific performance, for there was no contract at all. [xxii]

In the present case, the minds of the assignor and assignee can be said to have not met while entering into the assignment. The assignee never had any intention of undertaking any obligations of the assignor. In Hartog v Colin & Shields, [xxiii] the defendants made an offer to the plaintiffs to sell hare skins, offering to a pay a price per pound instead of per piece.

AVOIDING THESE RISKS

To concretize ICICI Bank’s stand on the assignment of obligations in the matter of loans secured by insurance policies, the relevant security documents could be amended to include such a clause.

For instances where loans are secured by life insurance policies, a standard set by the American Banker’s Association (ABA) has been followed by many Indian commercial institutions as well. [xxvi] The ABA is a trade association in the USA representing banks ranging from the smallest community bank to the largest bank holding companies. ABA’s principal activities include lobbying, professional development for member institutions, maintenance of best practices and industry standards, consumer education, and distribution of products and services. [xxvii]

There are several ICICI security documents which have included clauses denying any assignment of obligations to it. An extract of the deed of hypothecation for vehicle loan has been reproduced below:

“ 3. In further pursuance of the Loan Terms and for the consideration aforesaid, the Hypothecator hereby further agrees, confirms, declares and undertakes with the Bank as follows:

(i)(a) The Hypothecator shall at its expenses keep the Assets in good and marketable condition and, if stipulated by the Bank under the Loan Terms, insure such of the Assets which are of insurable nature, in the joint names of the Hypothecator and the Bank against any loss or damage by theft, fire, lightning, earthquake, explosion, riot, strike, civil commotion, storm, tempest, flood, erection risk, war risk and such other risks as may be determined by the Bank and including wherever applicable, all marine, transit and other hazards incidental to the acquisition, transportation and delivery of the relevant Assets to the place of use or installation. The Hypothecator shall deliver to the Bank the relevant policies of insurance and maintain such insurance throughout the continuance of the security of these presents and deliver to the Bank the renewal receipts / endorsements / renewed policies therefore and till such insurance policies / renewal policies / endorsements are delivered to the Bank, the same shall be held by the Hypothecator in trust for the Bank. The Hypothecator shall duly and punctually pay all premia and shall not do or suffer to be done or omit to do or be done any act, which may invalidate or avoid such insurance. In default, the Bank may (but shall not be bound to) keep in good condition and render marketable the relevant Assets and take out / renew such insurance. Any premium paid by the Bank and any costs, charges and expenses incurred by the Bank shall forthwith on receipt of a notice of demand from the Bank be reimbursed by the Hypothecator and/or Borrower to the Bank together with interest thereon at the rate for further interest as specified under the Loan Terms, from the date of payment till reimbursement thereof and until such reimbursement, the same shall be a charge on the Assets…”

The inclusion of such a clause in all security documents of the Bank can avoid the problem of assignability of obligations in insurance policies used as security for any facility sanctioned by it.

An assignment of securities is of utmost importance to any lender to secure the facility, without which the lender will not be entitled to any interest in the securities so deposited.

In this paper, one has seen the need for assignment of securities of a facility. Risks involved in not having a separate clause dealing with non assignability of obligations have been discussed. Certain defences which ICICI Bank may raise in case of the dispute have also been enumerated along with solutions to the same.

Formatted by March 2nd, 2019.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

[i] J.H. Tod v. Lakhmidas , 16 Bom 441, 449

[ii] http://www.licindia.in/policy_conditions.htm#12, last visited 30 th June, 2014

[iii] Headwaters Construction Co. Ltd. v National City Mortgage Co. Ltd., 720 F. Supp. 2d 1182 (D. Idaho 2010)

[iv] Indian Contract Act and Specific Relief Act, Mulla, Vol. I, 13 th Edn., Reprint 2010, p 968

[v] Khardah Co. Ltd. v. Raymond & Co ., AIR 1962 SC 1810: (1963) 3 SCR 183

[vi] Principles of Insurance Law, M.N. Srinivasan, 8 th Edn., 2006, p. 857

[vii] Ram Baran v Ram Mohit , AIR 1967 SC 744: (1967) 1 SCR 293

[viii] Sri Sarada Mills Ltd. v Union of India, AIR 1973 SC 281

[ix] Lala Kapurchand Godha v Mir Nawah Himayatali Khan, [1963] 2 SCR 168

[x] Velayudhan v Pillaiyar, 9 Mad LT 102 (Mad)

[xi] Hindustan Ideal Insurance Co. Ltd. v Satteya, AIR 1961 AP 183

[xii] Mulraj Khatau v Vishwanath, 40 IA 24 – Respondent based his claim on a mere deposit of the policy and not under a written transfer and claimed that a charge had thus been created on the policy.

[xiii] Insure Policy Plus Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. v The Life Insurance Corporation of India, 2007(109)BOMLR559

[xiv] Transfer of Property Act, Sanjiva Row, 7 th Edn., 2011, Vol II, Universal Law Publishing Company, New Delhi

[xv] Ghaziabad Development Authority v Union of India, AIR 2000 SC 2003

[xvi] United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v M/s. Pushpalaya Printers, [2004] 3 SCR 631, General Assurance Society Ltd. v Chandumull Jain & Anr., [1966 (3) SCR 500]

[xvii] UNIDROIT Principles, Art 4.3

[xviii] B.L.Sreedhar & Ors. v K.M. Munireddy & Ors., 2002 (9) SCALE 183

[xix] James Miller & Partners Ltd. v Whitworth Street Estates (Manchester) Ltd., [1970] 1 All ER 796 (HL)

[xx] Godhra Electricity Co. Ltd. v State of Gujarat, AIR 1975 SC 32

[xxi] Amalgamated Investment & Property Co. Ltd. v Texas Commerce International Bank Ltd., [1981] 1 All ER 923

[xxii] Smt. Mayawanti v Smt. Kaushalya Devi, 1990 SCR (2) 350

[xxiii] [1939] 3 All ER 566

[xxiv] Terrell v Alexandria Auto Co., 12 La.App. 625

[xxv] http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/CISG25/Pamboukis.pdf, last visited on 30 th June, 2014

[xxvi] https://www.phoenixwm.phl.com/shared/eforms/getdoc.jsp?DocId=525.pdf, last visited on 30 th June, 2014

[xxvii] http://www.aba.com/About/Pages/default.aspx, last visited on 30 th June, 2014

Related Posts:

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Give it a try, you can unsubscribe anytime :)

Thanks, I’m not interested

Easily Organize, Claim and Renew Insurance!

Assignment vs Nomination in Life Insurance

Table of Content:

• Difference between nomination and assignment
• What is nomination in life insurance?

1. Beneficial Nominee

• 2. Minor Nominee

3. Non-Family Nominee

4. multiple nominees.

• 4. Changing Nominee
• 6.Successive Nominee
• Important things to know about nominations
• What is an assignment in life insurance?
• Types of assignment in life insurance

Important things to know about assignments

• Differences between nominations and assignments:

Difference between Nomination and Assignment

In life insurance products, two terms assignment and nomination are frequently used. While not many may understand them, it is imperative to know the meaning and the difference between assignment and nomination before purchasing any insurance plan. 

The primary difference is about policy ownership. While in nomination, the policy owner remains unchanged. However, in an assignment, the policy ownership is transferred from one person to another. The nominee (as in nomination) gets the benefit after the death of the life assured but the assignee (as in assignment) gets the benefits when the life assured transfers the rights and ownership of his/her policy to the assignee. These are some of the basic and common differences between nomination and assignment. 

Let us learn some more about assignment and nomination, and what role they play in insurance. 

What is Nomination in life insurance?

Nomination is one of the most essential processes of the life insurance policy. The policyholder has to make any one family member his/her nominee. The nominee is considered eligible to claim the benefits of the life insurance policy if the insured individual dies. In this way, the insurance company ensures that the family of the insured does not have to suffer financial problems even after an earning member of the family passes away. Hence, the policyholder should choose the nominee of his/her insurance policy carefully.

Types of nominees in life insurance  

The policyholder gets the choice of choosing one among the five types of nominees. Let’s understand them in detail. Here are the following five types of nominees in life insurance:

IRDA has introduced a new term ‘beneficiary nominee’ instead of the nominee. It means that the policyholder has the right to make anyone his/her nominee. The nominee can be the policyholder’s parent/ guardian, child, or companion. If the policyholder has already chosen his/her nominee, then no dispute will arise in getting the claim.

2. Minor Nominee

The policyholder can make his/her minor child the nominee of his/her life insurance policy to secure the child’s future in his/her absence. But if the insured individual dies untimely, the amount of the claim will be payable to the legal custodian or the appointee of the child. The child’s custodian hands over that money to the child when he/she turns 18 years old.

It is also possible for the policyholder to choose a non-family member as his/her nominee. However, this is generally not recommended.

Two or more two persons can be chosen by the policyholder under the multiple nominees of the insurance policy. In this case, the policyholder divides the share of the total amount between the two nominees. If the policyholder doesn’t divide the amount while filling the nomination form, then, the amount of the claim is divided equally between the nominees by the insurer.

5. Changing Nominee

Under this type of nominee, the policyholder is able to choose his/her nominee during the life insurance policy tenure.

6. Successive Nominee

Under many circumstances, people prefer choosing more than 1 nominee, in successive nominations, one can choose up to three nominees. After the death of the insured, the 1st nominee will receive the death benefit. In case the 1st nominee is also dead, the death benefit will go to the 2nd nominee and so on. 

Important Things to Know About Nominations  

There are a few quintessential things about the nominations that every policyholder must keep in mind. The important things that should be known about nominations are given below: 

• The life assured and the policyholder should be the same in the life insurance policy for the process of nomination. If they are two different persons, then, the claim benefits will be taken by the policyholder of the insurance plan.
• The nominee has no right to request any kind of change in the insurance policy.

What is an Assignment in Life Insurance?

Under Section 38 of the Insurance Act, 1938, there is a provision for assignment in life insurance. The policyholder transfers the rights of his/her policyholder to another person. The person who transfers the insurance rights is called the assignor and the person to whom the policy rights are transferred is called the assignee. In this way, the assignee becomes the owner of the insurance policy. 

Generally, the people choose banks for assigning their policy rights. The bank becomes the policyholder but the life assured of the insurance policy is not changed. The benefits of the claim are received by the bank (policyholder). 

Types of Assignment in Life Insurance  

There are two types of assignment in life insurance i.e. Absolute Assignment and Conditional Assignment.

1. Absolute Assignment

In the absolute assignment, the rights of the life insurance policy are given to another person (assignee) without any terms and conditions. Generally, this type of assignment is done by the policyholders to show love for someone or to repay the bank loan.

2. Conditional Assignment

In a conditional assignment, the policyholder (assignor) transfers the rights of the life insurance policy to another person (assignee) under certain terms and conditions. If the terms and conditions are fulfilled, only then, the ownership of the policy will be transferred. 

Check out the essential things about the assignment that you must not forget to keep in mind:

• Only the owner of the policy is changed in the assignment. The life assured will remain the same.
• The policyholder of each insurance plan can transfer the rights of the insurance policy to the assignee. Only the pension plan and the insurance plans that are bought under the Married Women’s Property Act (MWP) are excluded.
• The nomination of the insurance policy is cancelled if the policyholder gives the rights of his/her insurance policy to the insurance company for paying the insurance company’s loan.

Differences between Nominations and Assignments

The table given below gives you a quick insight into the several differences between nominations and assignments.

It is very important for the policyholder to know about assignment and nomination. This is because the nomination and assignment have their own benefits that the policyholder can enjoy without any ado. Therefore, a piece of complete information has been shared with the help of this article. It is recommended to the policyholder to choose the right life insurance policy that can serve their family members even in their absence.

Related post:

Life Insurance Companies

• Life Insurance Premium Calculator
• LIC Plans for 10 Years with Returns & Alternatives

1. What is the meaning of endorsement in the assignment?

The policyholder has to sign the endorsement while transferring the rights of his/her insurance policy to the assignee. The sign of one witness is also required. Thereafter, the policyholder (assignor) has to mention precisely the reasons for transferring the rights of the insurance policy. The terms and conditions are also mentioned in the form (if any). Furthermore, the details of the assignee are also included in the form. 

2. What are the liabilities and rights of the assignee?

The liabilities and rights of the assignee are different on the basis of the types of assignment. In the absolute assignment, the right of policy ownership, responsibility to pay future insurance premiums, and the right of getting maturity benefits are transferred to the assignee. But in the conditional assignment, these rights and liabilities are determined as per the terms and conditions. 

3. When does the insurance company cancel the nomination in the assignment process?

When the assignor assigns the rights of the insurance policy to the assignee, then the nomination is cancelled by the insurance company. The nomination is not cancelled if the assignment is temporary. In that case, the rights of the insurance policy will be given back to the insured when he/she will pay the loan. 

4. Who can become the assignee of my insurance policy?

The assignee of the insurance policy can be a person or a financial institution. There should be an insurable interest between you and the person/financial institution. The assignee is either temporary or permanent. In some cases, the insured chooses the financial institution or insurance company as the assignee on some terms and conditions. But after some time, when the loan is paid, the insured will become the owner of the insurance policy again.

5. When does the insurance company accept the assignment?

If the insurance company finds that there is an insurable interest between the assignor and assignee, then the assignment is accepted. The insurance company makes sure that the assignment is not against the public interest and also not for trading purposes. The assignment should be in the interest of the policyholder only.

This article is issued in the general public interest and is for educational purposes only. The blogs should not be used as a substitute for competent expert advice from a licensed professional to best suit your needs. Insurance is a subject matter of solicitation. For more details on policy terms, conditions, exclusions, limitations, please refer/read policy brochure before concluding sale.

Found this post informational?

Browse Turtlemint Blogs to read interesting posts related to Health Insurance , Car Insurance , Bike Insurance , and Life Insurance . You can visit Turtlemint to Buy Insurance Online.

Get Best Insurance Quotes For

Health Insurance

Life Insurance

Car Insurance

Bike Insurance

Related Blogs

Top Life Insurance Companies in India (Updated List 2024)

Table of Contents Introduction to Life Insurance What Does Life Insurance Cover? Common Types of Life Insurance Policies Offered Common Types of Life Insurance Policy Riders…

Ankita Sejpal

Feb 05, 2024

What is Mobile Insurance? Compare Mobile Phone Insurance – A Detailed Guide, 2024

Mobiles have become the part and parcel of the modern generation. It is no longer just a means to talk with people, mobiles today have become multifaceted which allow you to click pictures, chat…

Dec 28, 2023

Difference Between Annuity & Life Insurance

Life is full of surprises. Understanding and planning before any unforeseen events give you the benefit of financial stability. Knowing your financial requirements and retirement plans can give you…

Rupanjali Mitra Basu

Dec 27, 2023

Employees’ State Insurance Scheme – All you need to know about ESIS

Table of Contents What is the ESIS? What is the Employees’ State Insurance Corporation? Employees’ State Insurance Corporation Composition Eligibility for ESIS Features of ESIS How does…

YSR Pension Kanuka Eligibility Criteria, Benefits & Types

Table of Contents What is YSR Pension Kanuka YSR Pension eligibility criteria  Features of YSR Pension Kanuka Benefits of YSR Pension Kanuka Types of pensions under the YSR Pension…

Dec 21, 2023

Deferred Annuity: Meaning, Benefits, Types & How It Works

Financial planning is important in all phases of life. But planning for retirement is vital to secure social status and financial stability in your old age. A deferred annuity is one such retirement…

Jul 29, 2022

Is Suicide Covered Under Life Insurance Policy

Life insurances are your safety protocols. They are to support the family after their family member’s demise financially. But what if the insured individual dies by suicide? Will the assured sum…

Jul 19, 2022

Difference Between Participating & Non Participating Policy

Table of Contents Participating and non participating Life Insurance Plans Participating Life Insurance Plan Working of Participating Plans Non-Participating Plan Working of Non…

Policy Cancellation & Refund

Policy cancellation and refund of the premium shall be as per the terms & conditions of the policy. The refunds are processed by the Insurance Company directly. You are requested to contact the toll free number of your Insurance Company or refer the respective section of your Policy terms and conditions. You can also call us at our toll free number 1800-266-0101 or write a mail to us at [email protected] . We shall be available to guide/assist you.

Confused about insurance? Let’s simplify it together!

Submit your details for expert guidance and hassle-free assistance.

IRDAI certified expert advice

Application assistance

Claim support

Get free advice

Now sit back and relax!

Our advisor will reach out to you shortly!

• INSIDER REVIEWS
• TECH BUYING GUIDES

Difference Between Nomination and Assignment

Bi india bureau   .

READ MORE ARTICLES ON

• What Is Nomination
• Definition Of Assignment
• Difference Between Nomination And Assignment
• Definition Of Nomination
• What Is Assignment

Popular Right Now

Advertisement

The Insurance Laws (Amendment) Act, 2015 and life insurance policyholders

• Published: 15 October 2015
• Volume 6 , pages 231–253, ( 2015 )

Cite this article

• Mangesh Patwardhan 1 &

229 Accesses

Explore all metrics

The insurance sector in India has long been an area that required a comprehensive legislative overhaul. This paper examines the recent amendments brought in this area through legislation. It is well known that insurance reform in India has followed a long and convoluted process spanning more than a decade, including a report by the Law Commission of India, a series of parliamentary standing and select committees and the use of ordinance powers. The paper explains the impact that the amendments have on nomination and assignment with respect to life insurance policies, the legal issues that arise in case of subsequent assignment, the nature of insurable interest under the new regime and the applicability of this framework to assignment of non-life personal insurance policies. This paper proposes a framework that would do away with current notions of nomination and assignment, instead adopting the twin concepts of beneficiary and transferee. In this manner, problems that arise from the dual nature of life insurance, as protection and property, would partly disappear once the legal regime is more closely aligned with the underlying economic rationale behind such instruments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

GST and Insurance: Singapore

Litigation and Legal Expenses Insurance

Guarantee Structures in Life Annuities: A Comparative Analysis

Explore related subjects.

• Medical Ethics

Law Commission of India, 190th Report on the Revision of the Insurance Act, 1938 and the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority Act, 1999 (2004), available at http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/reports/InsuranceReport-2nddraft1.pdf [hereinafter LCI Report].

Report of the Select Committee on the Insurance Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2008 (2014), available at http://www.prsindia.org/uploads/media/Insurance/Select%20committee%20on%20Insurance%20Laws.pdf . (The Report was presented to the Rajya Sabha on Dec. 10, 2014) [hereinafter Select Committee Report].

For the sake of convenience, we refer to the Act as it was in force immediately prior to the promulgation of the Ordinance as the earlier Act and the Act as amended by the Ordinance as the amended Act. The amending provisions in the Ordinance and those in the 2015 Act are identical.

OXFORD ADVANCED LEARNER’S DICTIONARY (9th ed., 2009).

A.I.R. 1984 S.C. 346.

We retain the masculine gender only so that the discussion aligns smoothly with the references in the Act provisions.

LCI Report, supra note 1, at 80, 82.

IRDA has been renamed as the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India by § 105 of the 2015 Act.

Select Committee Report, supra note 2, at 34.

Insurance Development Regulatory Authority Act, 1999, § 39(6).

The Insurance Laws (Amendment) Act, No. 5 of 2015, § 39(8).

This corresponds to § 38(8) of the amended Act.

The proviso to § 39(4) of the earlier Act.

The Insurance Laws (Amendment) Act, No. 5 of 2015, §45.

LCI Report, supra note 1, at 71.

The Insurance Laws (Amendment) Act, No. 5 of 2015, proviso to § 38(10).

LCI Report , supra note 1, at 71.

Kenneth Black Jr. ET AL ., Life Insurance 660 (14th ed. 2013).

Id. , at 455.

Id. , at 455–56.

Insurance Institute of India, Principles of Insurance IC-01 112 (1st ed. 2011).

222 U.S. 149 (1911).

Id. , at 155.

Id. , at 156.

A.I.R. 1962 S.C. 814.

See Black et al, supra note 19, at 604–5.

[2007] 79 S.C.L. 583 (Bom.).

A.I.R. 1959 S.C. 78.

LIC has moved the Supreme Court vide a Special Leave Petition. See Falaknaaz Syed, LIC to Move SC over Policy Trading Issue , Bus. Stand. (April 27, 2007) available at http://www.business-standard.com/article/finance/lic-to-move-sc-over-policy-trading-issue-107042701041_1.html .

LCI Report , supra note 1, at 73.

The Insurance Laws (Amendment) Act, No. 5 of 2015, § 38(2).

The Insurance Laws (Amendment) Act, No. 5 of 2015, § 38(3) and (4).

See Black ET AL, supra note 19, at 23.

The issue as to the legal status of the nominee in these contexts is a complex one. See Mangesh Patwardhan, The Nomination Riddle: Will the Real Nominee Please Stand Up? , 41 Chart. Secry. 170 (2011).

Amir & Orly Lobel, Stumble, Predict, Nudge: How Behavioral Economics Informs Law and Policy, 108 Colum. L. Rev. 2098, 2121 (2008).

See Debosmita Nandy & Avisha Gupta, Insure Policy Plus Services (P) Ltd. v. Life Insurance Corporation of India: Can Life Insurance Policies Be Traded? , 1 Nujs L. Rev. 653, 667 (2008).

Id. , at 664.

See Black ET AL, supra note 19, at 605.

Id. , at 101.

See Mithoolal Nayak v. LIC of India AIR, 1962 S.C. 814.

See Colin Camerer et al., Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for Asymmetric Paternalism , 151 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1211, 1212 (2003) (arguing that [a] regulation is asymmetrically paternalistic if it creates large benefits for those who make errors, while imposing little or no harm on those who are fully rational).

MINISTRY OF FINANCE, REPORT OF THE FINANCIAL SECTOR LEGISLATIVE REFORMS COMMISSION (2013), available at http://finmin.nic.in/fslrc/fslrc_index.asp [hereinafter FSLRC Report].

Id. , at 152.

Id. , at 177. (Unless specified, insurable interest will not be required to constitute a valid insurance contract. The Regulator may specify the types of contracts of insurance that may require insurable interest).

FSLRC Report, supra note 43, at 152.

INSURANCE INSTITUTE OF INDIA, supra note 22, at 51.

George E. Rejda, Principles of Risk Management and Insurance 178 (10th ed. 2011).

It is not clear whether the Regulator can specify this requirement only at inception or as a general rule. This ambiguity only makes the problem worse.

Aradhya Sethia, Excessive Delegation in the Judicial Appointments Bill?, Law and Other Things (August 30, 2014), available at http://lawandotherthings.blogspot.in/2014/08/excessive-delegation-in-judicial.html .

Ajoy Kumar Banerjee v. Union of India, (1984) 3 S.C.C. 127.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

National Insurance Academy, Pune, India

Mangesh Patwardhan & S. Uma

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mangesh Patwardhan .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Patwardhan, M., Uma, S. The Insurance Laws (Amendment) Act, 2015 and life insurance policyholders. Jindal Global Law Review 6 , 231–253 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41020-015-0014-3

Download citation

Published : 15 October 2015

Issue Date : October 2015

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s41020-015-0014-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Life insurance
• Nominations
• Assignments
• Non-life personal insurance
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

MEMBERSHIP PROGRAMS

• Law.com Pro
• Law.com Pro Mid-Market
• Global Leaders In Law
• Global Leaders In Law Advisers
• Private Client Global Elite

MEDIA BRANDS

• Law.com Radar
• American Lawyer
• Corporate Counsel

National Law Journal

• Legal Tech News

New York Law Journal

• The Legal Intelligencer
• The Recorder
• Connecticut Law Tribune
• Daily Business Review
• Daily Report
• Delaware Business Court Insider
• Delaware Law Weekly

New Jersey Law Journal

• Texas Lawyer
• Supreme Court Brief
• Litigation Daily
• Deals & Transactions
• Law Firm Management
• Legal Practice Management
• Legal Technology
• Intellectual Property
• Cybersecurity
• Law Journal Newsletters
• Analyst Reports
• Diversity Scorecard
• Kirkland & Ellis
• Latham & Watkins
• Baker McKenzie
• Verdict Search
• Law.com Compass
• China Law & Practice
• Insurance Coverage Law Center
• Law Journal Press
• Lean Adviser Legal
• Legal Dictionary
• Law Catalog
• Expert Witness Search
• Recruiters Directory
• Editorial Calendar

Legal Newswire

• Lawyer Pages
• Law Schools
• Women in Influence (WIPL)
• GC Profiles
• How I Made It
• Instant Insights
• Special Reports
• Resource Center
• LMA Member Benefits
• Legal Leaders
• Trailblazers
• Expert Perspectives
• Lawjobs.com
• Book Center
• Professional Announcements
• Asset & Logo Licensing

Content Source

Content Type

About Us  |  Contact Us  |  Site Map

Advertise  |  Customer Service  |  Terms of Service

FAQ  |  Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 ALM Global, LLC.

All Rights Reserved.

• Federal Litigation & Regulatory Courts & Litigation Expert Columns Latest Stories Events
• NLJ 500 (current)
• Special Reports (current)
• Supreme Court Brief (current)
• Best Of (current)

Finalists Announced for The National Law Journal Legal Awards 2024

We are pleased to unveil the finalists and honorees for The National Law Journal Legal Awards highlighting the top litigation and appellate work from the past year.

August 22, 2024 at 02:00 PM

5 minute read

Victoria Ostrander

Share with email, thank you for sharing.

We are pleased to unveil the finalists and honorees for The National Law Journal Legal Awards highlighting the top litigation and appellate work from the previous year.

The law firms and attorneys being recognized this year stood out for their work guiding clients through high-stakes litigation, their cutting-edge approaches to environmental, social and corporate governance issues, as well their as diversity and inclusion initiatives. The list also includes the winner of the Lifetime Achievement Award as well as those being recognized on the Appellate Hot List and Rising Stars.

Want to continue reading? Become an ALM Digital Reader for Free!

Benefits of a digital membership.

• Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
• Access to the entire ALM network of websites
• Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
• Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
• Search by a wide range of topics

Register Now

Already have an account? Sign In Now

*May exclude premium content

You Might Like

DOJ, 8 State AGs Sue RealPage for Alleged Sherman Act Violations in Algorithmic Pricing Scheme

By Kat Black

9th Circuit Split Over 'Loper Bright' Impact on Challenge to Sentencing Guideline in Gun Case

By Avalon Zoppo

Criminal Case Against Tom Girardi

By Amanda Bronstad

As Nonequity Tiers Give Greater 'Compensation Flexibility,' Other Law Firms Will Likely Follow Wilmer

By Abigail Adcox

Trending Stories

Sidley Offers Associates 'Managing' Titles. Why Isn't It Catching On?

The American Lawyer

Clifford Chance Amsterdam Partner Bas Boris Visser Dies Unexpectedly

International Edition

A Law Firm Was Hacked. Now It Faces a Class Action Lawsuit

SEC, Richard Heart Clash in Dueling Motions Over $1 Billion Unregistered Securities Litigation

Gibson Dunn Restructuring Partner Exits for Latham After 16 Months

• 25 Years of the Am Law 200: Is Size as a Strategy a Winning Formula?
• People, Places & Profits, Part III: Are Law Firm Financial Metrics Keeping Pace With Inflationary Growth?
• The A-List, Innovation, and Professional Development: How Market Trends Are Impacting What it Takes to Be a Well-Rounded Firm

Featured Firms

Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates P.C. 75 Ponce De Leon Ave NE Ste 101 Atlanta , GA 30308 (470) 294-1674 www.garymartinhays.com

Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone 2 Oliver St #608 Boston , MA 02109 (857) 444-6468 www.marksalomone.com

Smith & Hassler 1225 N Loop W #525 Houston , TX 77008 (713) 739-1250 www.smithandhassler.com

Presented by BigVoodoo

More From ALM

• Events & Webcasts

The National Law Journal honors attorneys & judges who've made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in the D.C. area.

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.

The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.

White Plains cyber security group seeks litigation law firm.Breach of contract $11,000,000 plusNow in Supreme court WestchesterWill conside...

Educational law firm seeks highly motivated Litigation Associate admitted in New Jersey with 3-6 years of first chair trial litigation exper...

McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a junior to midlevel litigation associate for its office located in Wilmington, DE. Two to f...

Professional Announcement

Subscribe to National Law Journal

Don't miss the crucial news and insights you need to make informed legal decisions. Join National Law Journal now!

Already have an account? Sign In

Breaking news and trends for law firm and legal departments about the evolving federal regulations in a volatile political climate.

Federal Legal News

• Courts & Litigation
• Expert Columns
• Latest Stories

Special Coverage

• Special Supplements

Surveys & Rankings

• The NLJ 500
• Current Issue