use of critical thinking in students

• Title & authors

Viado, Ana L., and Jo A. E. Department. "The Collaborative-Individual Learning in Improving the Critical Thinking Skills of Secondary Students in the Philippines." International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research , vol. 4, no. 7, 2023, pp. 2592-2600, doi: 10.11594/ijmaber.04.07.35 .

Download citation file:

Critical thinking is at the forefront of learning, it builds self-empowerment and confidence. The study aimed to evaluate the influence of collaborative-individual learning on the critical thinking abilities of secondary students in the Philippines. The research sought to answer several questions, including the initial level of critical thinking skills, how the collaborative-individual learning approach was implemented, the level of critical thinking skills after the intervention, whether there was a significant difference before and after the intervention, and which group of students benefited the most from the approach. The study involved 215 Grade 10 students and utilized a single subject experimental design. Pre-tests and post-tests were conducted, and statistical tools such as item analysis, frequency distribution, mean difference, standard deviation, and t-tests were employed. The findings indicated that the students' critical thinking skills improved significantly after the application of collaborative-individual learning. School C demonstrated the highest level of interest and implementation. Based on the results, the study recommends incorporating collaborative-individual learning in teaching Economics and other subjects to enhance students' critical thinking skills. School administrators are encouraged to promote the use of this strategy.

Table of contents

• Focus & Scope
• Author Guidelines
• Author Fees
• Online Submission
• Publication Ethics
• Screening For Plagiarism
• Editorial Board
• Peer Reviewers
• Visitor Statistics
• Indexing & Abstacting
• Journal History

IN COLLABORATION WITH

Certificate SINTA 2

• Other Journals

REFERENCE MANAGEMENT TOOLS

• For Readers
• For Authors
• For Librarians

ISSN BARCODE ISSN (PRINT)

ISSN (ONLINE)

Statcounter

• Announcements

Digital Pedagogy Philosophy: Building Critical Awareness of The Role of Technology in Education

Technology integration in education raises the need for a philosophical foundation that guides the use of technology in learning contexts. The philosophy of digital pedagogy is an approach that provides an ethical basis and values that guide the application of technology in the educational process. This paper aims to explore the relationship between digital pedagogical philosophy, critical consciousness, and the role of technology in shaping contextual and adaptive learning experiences. This research uses a hermeneutic approach to describe the reality of Digital Pedagogical Philosophy in building critical awareness of the role of technology in education. This method involves elements of interpretation and description in analyzing and understanding the implications and significance of technology integration in the learning context. The philosophy of digital pedagogy provides a foundation for integrating technology into learning to support the formation of critical, creative, and responsible individuals. Critical awareness of the role of technology in education creates a deeper understanding of the challenges and opportunities faced in the digital environment. This approach can increase student interaction with course material, increase understanding of concepts, and promote critical thinking.

Acquah, E. O., & Commins, N. L. (2015). Critical reflection as a key component in promoting pre-service teachers’ awareness of cultural diversity. Reflective Practice , 16 (6), 790–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2015.1095729

Aguilera, E., & Salazar, C. (2023). Critical Digital Pedagogy in the Platform Society. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education . Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1888

Baharizqi, S. L., Muhtar, T., Herlambang, Y. T., & Nur Fahrozy, F. P. (2023). Kompetensi Pedagogik Di Era Society 5.0: Sebuah Tinjauan Dalam Perspektif Pedagogik Kritis. ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JOURNAL PGSD FIP UNIMED , 13 (2), 259. https://doi.org/10.24114/esjpgsd.v13i2.46286

Balbay, S. (2019). Enhancing Critical Awareness through Socratic Pedagogy. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics , 5 (3), 515–536. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.651348

Baroud, J., & Dharamshi, P. (2020). A Collaborative Self Study of Critical Digital Pedagogies in Teacher Education. Studying Teacher Education , 16 (2), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2020.1739639

Bernacki, M. L., Greene, J. A., & Crompton, H. (2020). Mobile technology, learning, and achievement: Advances in understanding and measuring the role of mobile technology in education. Contemporary Educational Psychology , 60 , 101827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101827

Bohlmann, M., Lanius, D., Maisenhölder, P., Moser, T., Noller, J., & Schwartz, M. (2023). On the Use of YouTube, Digital Games, Argument Maps, and Digital Feedback in Teaching Philosophy. Journal of Didactics of Philosophy , 7 , 1–20. https://doi.org/10.46586/JDPh.2023.9863

Buchanan, R. A., Forster, D. J., Douglas, S., Nakar, S., Boon, H. J., Heath, T., Heyward, P., D’Olimpio, L., Ailwood, J., Eacott, S., Smith, S., Peters, M., & Tesar, M. (2022). Philosophy of education in a new key: Exploring new ways of teaching and doing ethics in education in the 21st century. Educational Philosophy and Theory , 54 (8), 1178–1197. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.1880387

Byram, M. (2012). Language awareness and (critical) cultural awareness – relationships, comparisons and contrasts. Language Awareness , 21 (1–2), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2011.639887

Chen, Z. (2022). Exploring the application scenarios and issues facing Metaverse technology in education. Interactive Learning Environments , 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2133148

Clements, E. (2019). A conceptual framework for digital civics pedagogy informed by the philosophy of information. Journal of Documentation , 76 (2), 571–585. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-07-2019-0139

Coker, H. (2018). Purpose, Pedagogy and Philosophy: “Being” an Online Lecturer. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning , 19 (5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i5.3312

Coker, H. (2020). Why Does Digital Learning Matter? Digital Competencies, Social Justice and Critical Pedagogy in Initial Teacher Education. Journal of Teaching and Learning , 14 (1). https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v14i1.6259

Costa-Lopes, V. da, & Cunha, M. V. da. (2020). John Dewey: a busca por uma pedagogia retórica. Educação e Pesquisa , 46 . https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-4634202046218071

Daniela, L. (2019). Didactics of Smart Pedagogy (L. Daniela, Ed.). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01551-0

Darics, E. (2019). Critical Language and Discourse Awareness in Management Education. Journal of Management Education , 43 (6), 651–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562919848023

David, N. N., & Cain, K. (2023). Peopling Technologies educational model. ASCILITE Publications , 75–83. https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2023.589

Doddington, C. (2014). Philosophy, Art or Pedagogy? How should children experience education? Educational Philosophy and Theory , 46 (11), 1258–1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2012.755753

Dreamson, N. (2020). Critical Understandings of Digital Technology in Education: Meta-Connective Pedagogy . Routledge.

Fallace, T. (2020). John Dewey and the New Left, 1960-1988. Journal of Curriculum Studies , 52 (5), 593–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1783702

Farag, A., Greeley, L., & Swindell, A. (2022). Freire 2.0: Pedagogy of the digitally oppressed. Educational Philosophy and Theory , 54 (13), 2214–2227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.2010541

Farquhar, S., & White, E. J. (2014). Philosophy and Pedagogy of Early Childhood. Educational Philosophy and Theory , 46 (8), 821–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.783964

Fawns, T. (2022). An Entangled Pedagogy: Looking Beyond the Pedagogy—Technology Dichotomy. Postdigital Science and Education , 4 (3), 711–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00302-7

From, J. (2017). Pedagogical Digital Competence—Between Values, Knowledge and Skills. Higher Education Studies , 7 (2), 43. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n2p43

Gadotti, M., & Torres, C. A. (2009). Paulo Freire: Education for Development. Development and Change , 40 (6), 1255–1267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01606.x

Giroux, H. A. (2010). Rethinking Education as the Practice of Freedom: Paulo Freire and the Promise of Critical Pedagogy. Policy Futures in Education , 8 (6), 715–721. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2010.8.6.715

Giroux, H. A. (2020). On Critical Pedagogy . Bloomsbury Publishing.

Giroux, H. A., & Giroux, S. S. (2006). Challenging Neoliberalism’s New World Order: The Promise of Critical Pedagogy. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies , 6 (1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708605282810

Hanson‐Smith, E. (2016). Games, Gaming, and Gamification: Some Aspects of Motivation. TESOL Journal , 7 (1), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.233

Hansson, S. O. (2020). Social constructionism and climate science denial. European Journal for Philosophy of Science , 10 (3), 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-020-00305-w

Horn, R. A. (2003). Developing a Critical Awareness of the Hidden Curriculum through Media Literacy. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas , 76 (6), 298–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650309602024

Jardilino, J. R. L., & Soto-Arango, D. E. (2020). Paulo Freire e a Pedagogia Crítica: seu legado para uma nova pedagogia do Sul. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos Em Educação , 15 (3), 1072–1093. https://doi.org/10.21723/riaee.v15i3.12472

Kahn, K., & Winters, N. (2021). Constructionism and AI: A history and possible futures. British Journal of Educational Technology , 52 (3), 1130–1142. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13088

Kearney, M., Schuck, S., & Burden, K. (2022). Digital pedagogies for future school education: promoting inclusion. Irish Educational Studies , 41 (1), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.2024446

Kellner, D. (2001). Critical Pedagogy, Cultural Studies, and Radical Democracy at the Turn of the Millennium: Reflections on the Work of Henry Giroux. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies , 1 (2), 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/153270860100100205

Kellsey, D., & Taylor, A. (2017). The Learning Wheel: A model of digital pedagogy . Critical Publishing Ltd.

Kester, K., & Aryoubi, H. (2020). Paulo Freire: Citizenship and Education. In The Palgrave Handbook of Citizenship and Education (pp. 95–111). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67828-3_29

Knight, J., Dooly, M., & Barberà, E. (2023). Getting smart: towards critical digital literacy pedagogies. Social Semiotics , 33 (2), 326–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1836815

Knox, J. (2017). Data Power in Education: Exploring Critical Awareness with the “Learning Analytics Report Card.” Television & New Media , 18 (8), 734–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476417690029

Knox, J. (2019). What Does the ‘Postdigital’ Mean for Education? Three Critical Perspectives on the Digital, with Implications for Educational Research and Practice. Postdigital Science and Education , 1 (2), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00045-y

Lang, G. (2015). Maintaining Online Engagement in e-Learning Through Games Based Learning and Gamification Techniques (pp. 193–205). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19875-0_18

Lazarus, J. (2019). Hacking the MOOC: Towards a Postdigital Pedagogy of Critical Hope. Postdigital Science and Education , 1 (2), 391–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00063-w

Levin, I., & Tsybulsky, D. (2017). The Constructionist Learning Approach in the Digital Age. Creative Education , 08 (15), 2463–2475. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.815169

Lewin, C., Cranmer, S., & McNicol, S. (2018). Developing digital pedagogy through learning design: An activity theory perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology , 49 (6), 1131–1144. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12705

Lewin, D., & Lundie, D. (2016). Philosophies of Digital Pedagogy. Studies in Philosophy and Education , 35 (3), 235–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-016-9514-7

Lunevich, L. (2022a). Critical Digital Pedagogy: Alternative Ways of Being and Educating, Connected Knowledge and Connective Learning. Creative Education , 13 (06), 1884–1896. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.136118

Lunevich, L. (2022b). Critical Digital Pedagogy–Innovative Model Creativity in Teaching and Teaching for Creativity. In Creativity in Teaching and Teaching for Creativity . CRC Press.

Lynch, J. (2023). Critical Digital Pedagogy for the Anthropocene. In Critical Digital Pedagogy in Higher Education (pp. 205–218). Athabasca University Press. https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781778290015.013

Maboloc, C. R. (2021). Deep Thinking or Resistance? On Finding a Middle Ground between Paolo Freire’s Critical Pedagogy and John Dewey’s Pragmatism. Philosophia , 49 (3), 1097–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-020-00292-5

Marlowe, J. M., Appleton, C., Chinnery, S.-A., & Van Stratum, S. (2015). The Integration of Personal and Professional Selves: Developing Students’ Critical Awareness in Social Work Practice. Social Work Education , 34 (1), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2014.949230

McLaren, P. (2001). Che Guevara, Paulo Freire, and the Politics of Hope: Reclaiming Critical Pedagogy. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies , 1 (1), 108–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/153270860100100112

Mclaren, P. (2020). The future of critical pedagogy. Educational Philosophy and Theory , 52 (12), 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1686963

Neumeyer, X., Santos, S. C., & Morris, M. H. (2021). Overcoming Barriers to Technology Adoption When Fostering Entrepreneurship Among the Poor: The Role of Technology and Digital Literacy. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 68 (6), 1605–1618. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.2989740

Ng, W. (2015). New Digital Technology in Education . Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05822-1

Olusola O. Adesope, & Rud, A. G. (2019). Contemporary Technologies in Education (O. O. Adesope & A. G. Rud, Eds.). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89680-9

Örtegren, A. (2024). Philosophical underpinnings of digital citizenship through a postdigital lens: Implications for teacher educators’ professional digital competence. Education and Information Technologies , 29 (4), 4253–4285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11965-5

Papastephanou, M., Zembylas, M., Bostad, I., Oral, S. B., Drousioti, K., Kouppanou, A., Strand, T., Wain, K., Peters, M. A., & Tesar, M. (2022). Philosophy of education in a new key: Education for justice now. Educational Philosophy and Theory , 54 (8), 1083–1098. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1793539

Peters, M. A. (2020). Philosophy as pedagogy. In Wittgenstein, Anti-foundationalism, Technoscience and Philosophy of Education . Routledge.

Peters, M. A., & Besley, T. (2019). Critical Philosophy of the Postdigital. Postdigital Science and Education , 1 (1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0004-9

Phelan, L., & Lumb, M. (2021). Higher education for times of climate crisis – critical awareness, purpose and community. International Studies in Sociology of Education , 30 (1–2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2020.1854828

Prahani, B. K., Utama Alan Deta, Mochammad Yasir, Sri Astutik, Paken Pandiangan, Sayidah Mahtari, & Husni Mubarok. (2020). The Concept of “Kampus Merdeka” in Accordance with Freire’s Critical Pedagogy. Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education , 1 (1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.46627/sipose.v1i1.8

Rahayuningsih, Y. S., & Muhtar, T. (2022). Pedagogik Digital Sebagai Upaya untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Guru Abad 21. Jurnal Basicedu , 6 (4), 6960–6966. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3433

Redman, C., & Rodrigues, S. (2014). From Philosophy and Research to Pedagogy and Practice. In Handbook for Teacher Educators . Brill.

Rich, E., & Miah, A. (2014). Understanding Digital Health as Public Pedagogy: A Critical Framework. Societies , 4 (2), 296–315. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc4020296

Ridge, M. (2021). The Value of Value Capture. Journal of the Philosophy of Games . https://doi.org/10.5617/jpg.8760

Riga, F. (2020). Pragmatism—John Dewey (pp. 227–239). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_16

Sadovnik, A. R., Semel, S. F., Coughlan, R. W., Kanze, B., & Tyner-Mullings, A. R. (2017). Progressive Education in The 21st Century: The Enduring Influence of John Dewey. The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era , 16 (4), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537781417000378

Samacá Bohórquez, Y. (2020). Self-Dialogue with the Thoughts of Paulo Freire: A Critical Pedagogy Encounter. HOW , 27 (1), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.27.1.520

Santoianni, F. (2017). Models in Pedagogy and Education. In Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science (pp. 1033–1049). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4_49

Sargent, J., & Casey, A. (2020). Flipped learning, pedagogy and digital technology: Establishing consistent practice to optimise lesson time. European Physical Education Review , 26 (1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X19826603

Seidman, R. H. (2017). Tribute to Seymour Papert (1928–2016). Journal of Educational Computing Research , 55 (4), 447–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117710860

Shih, Y.-H. (2018). Some critical thinking on Paulo Freire’s critical pedagogy and its educational implications. International Education Studies , 11 (9), 64. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n9p64

Smoleń, M. (2015). Gamification as creation of a social system. In Gamification: Critical Approaches . University of Warsaw.

Stanczyk, P. (2021). The critique of the critical critique of critical pedagogy Freire, Suchodolski and the Materialist Pedagogy of Emancipation. Critical Education , 12 (4).

Szűts, Z. (2019). A critical approach to digital pedagogy - A holistic methodology in the information society. Opus et Educatio , 6 (4). https://doi.org/10.3311/ope.342

Szymkowiak, A., Melović, B., Dabić, M., Jeganathan, K., & Kundi, G. S. (2021). Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people. Technology in Society , 65 , 101565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101565

Tagg, C., & Seargeant, P. (2021). Context design and critical language/media awareness: Implications for a social digital literacies education. Linguistics and Education , 62 , 100776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.100776

Tarrant, S. P., & Thiele, L. P. (2016). Practice makes pedagogy – John Dewey and skills-based sustainability education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education , 17 (1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-09-2014-0127

Tesar, M., Hytten, K., Hoskins, T. K., Rosiek, J., Jackson, A. Y., Hand, M., Roberts, P., Opiniano, G. A., Matapo, J., St. Pierre, E. A., Azada-Palacios, R., Kuby, C. R., Jones, A., Mazzei, L. A., Maruyama, Y., O’Donnell, A., Dixon-Román, E., Chengbing, W., Huang, Z., … Jackson, L. (2022). Philosophy of education in a new key: Future of philosophy of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory , 54 (8), 1234–1255. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.1946792

Toda, A. M., Valle, P. H. D., & Isotani, S. (2018). The dark side of gamification: An overview of negative effects of gamification in education (pp. 143–156). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97934-2_9

Trifonas, P. P. (2012). Learning the virtual Life: Public pedagogy in a digital World . Routledge.

Urdang, E. (2010). Awareness of self—A critical tool. Social Work Education , 29 (5), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470903164950

Väätäjä, J. O., & Ruokamo, H. (2021). Conceptualizing dimensions and a model for digital pedagogy. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology , 15 , 183449092199539. https://doi.org/10.1177/1834490921995395

Voronin, D. M., Saienko, V. G., & Tolchieva, H. V. (2020). Digital transformation of pedagogical education at the university. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference “Digitalization of Education: History, Trends and Prospects” (DETP 2020) . https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200509.135

Wattimena, R. A. A. (2018). Pedagogi kritis: Pemikiran Henry Giroux tentang pendidikan dan relevansinya untuk Indonesia. Jurnal Filsafat , 28 (2), 180. https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.34714

Williams, P. J. (2020). An introduction to effective pedagogies of design and technology education. In Pedagogy for Technology Education in Secondary Schools. Contemporary Issues in Technology Education (pp. 1–17). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41548-8_1

Ye, Y., & Shih, Y.-H. (2021). Development of John Dewey’s educational philosophy and its implications for children’s education. Policy Futures in Education , 19 (8), 877–890. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210320987678

Zhang, J., & Yu, S. (2023). Reconceptualising digital pedagogy during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative inquiry into distance teaching in China. Innovations in Education and Teaching International , 60 (2), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.2000473

Zhu, L. (2018). An embodied cognition perspective on translation education: philosophy and pedagogy. Perspectives , 26 (1), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2017.1328449

Article Metrics

• There are currently no refbacks.

Jurnal Filsafat Indexed by:

Jurnal Filsafat ISSN 0853-1870 (print), ISSN 2528-6811 (online)

Log in using your username and password

• Search More Search for this keyword Advanced search
• Latest content
• For authors
• Browse by collection
• BMJ Journals

You are here

• Volume 14, Issue 8
• Exploring the perceptions of senior medical students on gender and pain: a qualitative study of the interplay between formal and hidden curricula
• Article Text
• Article info
• Citation Tools
• Rapid Responses
• Article metrics

• http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9334-0922 Megan E L Brown 1 ,
• Cristina Costache 2 ,
• Stephanie Bull Parker 3 ,
• http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0219-4956 Ravi Parekh 3 ,
• William Laughey 4 , 5 ,
• Sonia Kumar 6
• 1 School of Medicine , Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK
• 2 School of Medical Sciences , The University of Manchester , Manchester , UK
• 3 Medical Education Innovation & Research Centre, School of Public Health , Imperial College London , London , UK
• 4 Health Professions Education Unit , Hull York Medical School , York , UK
• 5 Reckitt Benckiser Plc , Slough , UK
• 6 University of Leeds , Leeds , UK
• Correspondence to Dr Megan E L Brown; megan.brown{at}newcastle.ac.uk

Objective Explore the perceptions of senior medical students on the relationship between gender and pain and examine how formal and hidden curricula in medical education shape their experiences.

Design We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative interview study, using individual semistructured interviews and adhering to interpretative description methodology. We used Braun and Clarke’s reflexive approach to thematic analysis to analyse our data.

Setting Six medical schools across the UK. Data collection occurred between the autumn of 2022 and the spring of 2023.

Participants 14 senior (penultimate or final year) medical students.

Results We created three themes, which describe key educational forces shaping students’ experiences of the relationship between gender and pain. These are (1) the sociocultural influencer, (2) the pedagogical influencer and (3) the professorial influencer. Our findings highlight the influence of both wider societal norms and students’ own identities on their experiences. Further, we explore the nature and detrimental role of formal curricular gaps, and negative role modelling as a key mechanism by which a hidden curriculum relating to gender and pain exerts its influence.

Conclusions These findings have several educational implications, including the need for a more holistic, person-centred approach to pain management within medical school curricula. Additionally, we recommend the creation of reflective spaces to engage students in critical thinking around bias and advocacy from the early stages of their training. We present actionable insights for medical educators to address issues of gender bias and pain management.

• MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING
• QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
• PAIN MANAGEMENT
• Chronic Pain

Data availability statement

No data are available. As ethical approval was not obtained to make data sharing possible outside of the listed research team, no additional data are available.

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ .

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080420

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions.

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY

By examining the hidden curricula of gender and pain within medical education, our research builds on previous studies noting insufficient formal education by highlighting the nuanced ways in which such gaps may be perpetuated or mitigated through everyday clinical interactions and informal learning experiences.

The in-depth, qualitative approach of this study has generated rich data and allowed for the consideration of important social and cultural nuances, captured particularly by our first theme: the sociocultural influencer.

The interview questions were codeveloped with a patient community group to shape and clarify our interview focus and language.

Though students were prompted to reflect on their experiences throughout medical school, this is a cross-sectional study, so students’ perceptions may have changed on recall.

Convenience sampling may mean that bias awareness appears more prevalent among medical students than it is within the wider medical student population.

Introduction

Gender bias in healthcare kills. This bias, which can be defined as ‘prejudiced actions or thoughts based on the gender-based perception that women are not equal to men’, 1 leads to increased mortality for girls and women. 2 For example, in countries with high levels of gender inequality, girls under the age of 5 are more likely to die than boys. 3 In the UK, women often receive poor medical treatment for gynaecological conditions, 4 and poorer care in relation to men for dementia 5 and cardiovascular disease. 6

Pain—its diagnosis and its management—is an area of healthcare practice where gendered stereotyping leads to poor outcomes for patients. Research indicates that the pain of Black women, for example, is not taken seriously by healthcare professionals, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. 7 Healthcare staff routinely underestimate women’s pain, leading to undertreatment and the suggestion of psychological rather than analgesic treatment. 8 Where women are scored with low rates of perceived ‘trustworthiness’, healthcare professionals are more likely to believe that they are exaggerating their pain. 9 Not only gender, but ethnicity, age, perceived attractiveness, likeability, manner and the presence or absence of medical diagnoses influence healthcare professionals’ perceptions of pain. 9

Though we know that gender bias exists in how healthcare professionals respond to and manage, pain (eg, women are perceived as more emotional than men), what is less clear are the reasons underlying such biases. 10 One potential explanation for how doctors develop biases is that they do so through the hidden curriculum. Doctors acquire many of their perspectives and professional values during medical school 11 where students are exposed to and experience such gender biases in the clinical workplace and the curriculum. This often happens via the mechanism of the hidden curriculum—‘…the attitudes and values conveyed, most often in an implicit and tacit fashion, sometimes unintentionally, via the educational structures, practices and culture of an educational institution’. 12 Influences operating within the hidden curriculum of medicine include clinical experiences, contact with role models, the attitudes of staff and patients, as well as external influences such as family/friends, the media and personal experiences. 11 Experiences within the hidden curriculum shape medical students’ views and carry into their future practice as a practising clinician.

While there is a growing clinical body of literature on gender and pain, relatively little attention has been paid to how medical education shapes students’ perceptions of gender and pain, and how these perceptions may affect their clinical practice as they become doctors. There is some literature on the presence or absence of pain assessment and management teaching within medical school curricula—one study, 13 for example, reports that pain education in US medical schools is fragmentary, limited and fails to cover key pain topics identified by the International Association for the Study of Pain. 13 While important, this study did not explore teaching on both gender bias and pain.

Another recent international study 14 has focused on gender and chronic pain within the curricula of the 10-top global ranked medical schools (as per the QS World University Rankings 2022). This study’s search revealed that the curricula of most medical schools lack comprehensive coverage of gender bias and chronic pain. 14 Our study aims to build on these findings by examining how medical education influences students’ attitudes and beliefs about gender and pain. While we know medical education on gender and chronic pain is insufficient, we do not have a detailed picture of UK medical education (only one UK institution was included in the study’s sample), we do not have intelligence on pain education beyond chronic pain, and we do not know whether and how that education influences students’ beliefs and attitudes towards gender and pain. Developing this understanding could help us reveal the implications of these educational practices. If medical students are not adequately trained to consider gender differences in pain perception and management, they may carry these biases into their professional practice, potentially leading to disparities in patient care and outcomes.

Henceforth, in this study, we explore the perceptions of senior medical students (penultimate or final year) in the UK on gender and pain, using a qualitative approach to examine how these perceptions relate to their experiences of formal and hidden curricula in medical education. To date, and to our best knowledge, no research exists regarding how the hidden curriculum of medical education relates to perceptions of gender and pain. Exploring this has cast light on the subtle, often unspoken, lessons regarding gender and pain that medical students experience alongside their formal education. By examining these hidden curricula, our research builds on previous studies noting insufficient formal education on gender bias and pain by highlighting the nuanced ways in which such gaps may be perpetuated or mitigated through everyday clinical interactions and informal learning experiences. This approach allows us to contribute to existing literature by capturing the full spectrum of medical student experiences relating to gender and pain.

Research questions

How do senior medical students perceive the relationship between gender and pain?

How do medical students experience the formal and hidden curricula of medical education in relation to gender and pain?

What elements of formal and hidden curricula within students’ longitudinal experience of medical education have influenced the development of their views on gender and pain?

Research approach

This is a constructivist, 15 cross-sectional qualitative study. We view reality as subjective, and knowledge as constructed uniquely by each individual in response to their interactions in social settings. 16 17 This is appropriate for our study, as we are interested in exploring, through qualitative interviews, students’ individual perceptions of pain and gender bias, and the ways in which they make sense and build their understanding of social experiences during medical school.

Methodology

The study methodology is interpretative description. The focus of this methodology is a rich description of participant experiences through the lens of the study research questions. It is aligned with a constructivist approach to qualitative research. 18 To support conclusions regarding the quality of this study, we consider how we designed Lincoln and Guba’s qualitative research evaluative criteria throughout, namely: credibility, dependability, transferability and confirmability. 19 20

Patient and public involvement

We piloted our interview questions in collaboration with the charity BME (Black and Minority Ethnic) Health Forum. Through the forum, we met with a focus group of four women to shape our interview focus and clarify our interview language. Members of the forum were compensated for their time in line with National Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR) guidance. 21 This collaboration helped to ensure that our questions were culturally sensitive and accurately captured the experiences of diverse participants, enhancing the credibility of our data collection.

Data collection

We invited senior medical students (students in their penultimate or final year of study) based at any UK medical school to participate in an individual, in-depth semistructured, virtual interview over Microsoft Teams. We employed convenience sampling based on participant interest in the study and availability, given that the medical student population can be difficult to access due to study demands. Pragmatically, we sampled until we reached 14 participants. We selected this figure based on available funding, capacity and our experience as qualitative researchers.

We recruited using social media and local email recruitment at two UK institutions. CC, SBP and MELB completed all interviews with consented volunteers, using the interview questions developed with BME Health Forum as prompts to structure the discussion. The interview schedule is available ( online supplemental material ). We conducted 1-hour interviews with 14 participants online from 6 UK medical schools. Each participant was offered a £20 food voucher as thanks for their time. The interview audio was transcribed verbatim by a professional transcription company, then anonymised for analysis.

Supplemental material

Data analysis.

We used Braun and Clarke’s reflexive approach to thematic analysis to analyse our data. 22 The six steps of the method were used as a framework for coding, sorting, classifying and describing our data. We worked with the coding software Dedoose (V.9.0) to organise our data. We maintained an audit trail of our data collection and analytical processes, including decisions made and changes implemented, to enhance the confirmability of our findings. The steps of analysis, and what we did within each, are detailed in table 1 . By following a structured and well-documented approach to thematic analysis, we ensured that our analytic procedures were systematic and transparent, which supports the dependability of our findings. Further, in providing rich, detailed descriptions of our themes and using participants' own words where possible, we aimed to offer insights that others might be able to apply to similar contexts, supporting the transferability of our findings.

• View inline

The process of reflexive thematic analysis followed in this study

Reflexivity

The authors met regularly to discuss their own positions and perspectives as researchers involved in the analysis of this study’s data. This is a critical component of Braun and Clarke’s method, 22 which recognises the active role researchers play in interpretation, how this can add depth to study findings, and the importance of reflecting transparently on these perspectives. Reflexivity statements for each member of the research team are provided in table 2 . These statements formalise some of the reflections we shared throughout this project and attuned us to our strengths as a diverse team, and areas where we may have less insight and so need to challenge ourselves to think more deeply. It is important to note that none of the research team had pre-existing educational or personal relationships with any of the study participants.

Team reflexivity statements

We interviewed 14 senior medical students and gave each participant the opportunity to select a pseudonym. Where a participant did not wish to select a pseudonym, we selected one for them from a pregenerated list of gender-neutral and non-identifiable names. The list was created to be culturally diverse—where participants disclosed their cultural background, we selected a name culturally associated with their background, given the importance of culture in discussions of pain.

The pseudonyms in use for all participants are listed in table 3 . Quotes from participants are indicated in the below discussion of themes using italic text.

Participant pseudonyms

We created three themes which capture medical students’ perceptions of gender and pain, and experiences of the hidden curriculum. We name three key educational influences students experience, and engage with, in relation to gender and pain: ‘the sociocultural influencer’; ‘the pedagogical influence’ and ‘the professorial influencer’. The sociocultural influencer is an educational force relating to societal and cultural norms; the pedagogical influencer is formed of formal educational experiences; and, finally, the professorial influencer relates to the influence of academic and clinical teachers.

Our broad themes have several analytical subthemes, which constitute subheadings within the results narrative. Our themes and subthemes are:

The sociocultural influencer: conceptualisations of the relationship between gender and pain are shaped by sociocultural norms.

Understandings of pain and gender are shaped by the replication of gendered stereotypes.

Understandings of pain and gender are shaped by students’ personal identities.

The pedagogical influencer: formal pain curricula are experienced as deficient.

Students experience tension between the clinical diagnosis and management of pain, and holistic understandings of pain.

Students are motivated to engage in learning about the relationship between gender and pain, and their role in addressing key challenges.

The professorial influencer: senior role models, particularly within clinical environments, help create a hidden curriculum of gender bias in relation to pain.

Understandings of pain and gender are shaped by the hidden curriculum’s communication of gendered stereotypes.

Senior clinicians often role model biased understandings of pain.

The sociocultural influencer: conceptualisations of the relationship between gender and pain are shaped by sociocultural norms

We asked students to define pain and elaborate on their understanding of its nature, and the relationship between gender and pain. This theme describes senior medical students’ responses to these prompts, or their thoughts and opinions regarding the relationship between gender and pain. Interestingly, students explored the sociocultural dimensions of their understanding—namely their knowledge and the impact of societal norms (such as gendered stereotypes) and the influence of their own backgrounds.

These constitute two subthemes within this theme. Taken together, they help to cast light on how sociocultural gender biases are both perpetuated and challenged by medical students when conceptualising the relationship between gender and pain. In sum, this theme provides insight into part of a complex web of sociocultural factors that seem to be influencing learners’ perceptions of pain and gender.

We present this theme first to provide a foundation for our exploration of formal and hidden medical school curricula. The thoughts and understandings voiced by students in this theme relate to their experiences of the sociocultural contexts and norms they navigate. This theme sets the stage for a deeper analysis of how formal and hidden curricula interact with broader sociocultural influences regarding pain and gender.

Understandings of pain and gender are shaped by the replication of gendered stereotypes broadly and in clinical practice

This subtheme illuminates the influence of stereotypes, assumptions and biases in this context. During data collection and analysis, it became evident that students’ perceptions were multifaceted and shaped by various factors, including societal and clinical norms, medical school teaching and personal experiences. We explore these influences in greater depth in later themes.

Personal identities shape students’ understanding of the relationship between gender and pain

In this subtheme, we explore how students’ personal experiences, backgrounds and identities play an important role in shaping their understanding of the relationship between gender and pain.

Students noted that where they shared experiences with patients in pain (either experiences of pain personally, or via family and friends’ experiences) they could better empathise with patients. M, for example, describes women in their family being dismissed when in pain–seeing the distress this causes on a personal level, has meant M aspires to take patients’ pain seriously: ‘ I’m always like, ‘oh my God no aunty, I swear I’ll take you seriously’…if [a patient] has said, ‘so and so’ and they’re visibly distressed because of it, yes, I think I take that a bit more seriously because I don’t want to be another dismissive doctor’ (M ). Students highlighted that their personal experiences of pain management influenced the recommendations they made to patients: ‘ That’s affected my suggestions for management… I’m often much more inclined to suggest physio, having been through that experience where… [I was] offered painkillers and nothing else’ (Krishna ).

Some women noted that being a woman in pain made it easier to sincerely empathise with other women experiencing pain. Andrea, for example, comments on their personal experiences of gynaecological services and pain as a source of empathy for patients with similar pain, interacting with similar services: ‘ Every single month I’m so much pain that I pass out and being like, oh my god. I’m so sorry to hear that, I’m not reading off a script and just writing, here is your mefenamic acid or whatever they give to them. So, I feel like that impacted myself in a professional way but also in a personal way, because it’s like, wow, gynaecological services across the board are bad. Whether you’re a medical student or you’re a patient yourself’ (Andrea ).

Similarly, where students shared a particular characteristic with patients, for example, ethnicity, they were more attuned to the intersectional nature of bias in relation to pain and the needs of patients who were like them for example, patients’ cultural norms and how this might influence pain presentation and management. M describes advocating for patients where language barriers are an issue, based on their own experience of this barrier within their family:

I think for anyone who cannot speak English to some degree, probably because I sometimes have to advocate for my own parents and stuff like that, that I feel like I always take what they’re saying seriously… everyone has a bit of unconscious bias when they think, “oh she’s being dramatic or he’s being dramatic”, well that’s not right. And it’s very easy to get into that mindset, but as soon as they can’t speak English I feel like I’m a bit more serious about it, because I feel like I have to be, because I don’t think anyone else is going to give them that benefit of the doubt (M).

The pedagogical influencer: formal pain curricula are experienced as deficient

Students spoke at length about gaps in their formal medical school curricula in relation to gender, pain and the relationship between them. In this theme, we discuss how gaps in medical school curricula in relation to pain and gender are experienced by medical students.

There were many gaps and curricula needs identified. Common to the suggestions made were the desire for enhanced learning about the relationship between pain and bias across all years of medical school (‘ it makes up so much of clinical practice, but so little of our teaching time’ (Jiva )), but with a particular focus on discussing bias early at medical school (‘ Bias needs to be introduced really early. We need to learn to accept it. We need to normalise talking about it. And we need to appreciate just because you had a biased action, that doesn’t make you evil. It makes you human. And you just need to try and do better next time’ (Peter )).

Students experience tension between the clinical diagnosis and management of pain, and holistic understandings of pain

Students saw existing curricula as focusing only on the pharmacological management of pain: ‘ at all stages it’s generally been focused on the [World Health Organisation] pain ladder’ (Krishna ).

This sends a hidden message to students and clinicians—that the focus of clinical practice should be the medical management of pain. This, coupled with a relative lack of holistic teaching on pain management and bias (‘ Medicine, at least the way medicine is taught at my university is very much like, if it’s not objective, it’s too difficult to try to make you conceptualise, so we’ll try to avoid that topic’ (Jiva )) leads to an uneasy tension where medical students understand pain both to be objective and physiological, but also to be subjectively experienced by each patient. This causes conflict in clinical practice (‘ we have ways of assessing patients’ pain by looking at them, by the way they move, how they act. And we quite often hear people say, ‘oh, they can’t be in that much pain because they’re doing this’… I generally try to look at pain as whatever the patient tells you it is’ (Rory )) and is implicated in previously described views regarding catching patients out who aren’t ‘actually’ in pain (‘ I’ve certainly spoken to patients and gone… They’ve said their pain is a nine out of ten. And I’ve gone, I don’t believe you. Obviously, not to the patient. But I’ve walked out the room and gone, I don’t believe you’ (Rory )).

Further, this hidden message contributes to the focus of clinicians (identified by the students) on treating the underlying cause of pain, rather than managing pain itself (‘ Doctors prioritise the particular condition or treatment over exploring the pain’ (Aarya )). This can also be connected to the unease students perceived clinicians as feeling when dealing with chronic pain (where an underlying cause may be illusive) (‘ It seems people come in for a recurrent pain and they’re just giving you medication and don’t really discuss the impact or the hows and the whys or the self-help’ (Michelle )), pain of psychological origin (‘ I think that if someone is in pain and physicians perceive that there isn’t a visible or diagnosable related physical experience that would cause them that level of pain, I don’t think that there is much sympathy for patients’ (Alex)), and subsequent poor management of such patients.

Relatedly, students recognised the need for an enhanced focus on the lived experiences of people who are/have experienced pain. They saw opportunities for an increased focus on patient perspectives (in relation to pain and gender) in case studies, as both a developing strand within spiral curricula models, and through engagement with the arts and humanities: ‘ I think it’s best to hear it from and have talked with patients themselves to name their experience. But I think the next best thing would be reading patient accounts, reading poems, reading narratives about what it’s actually like to experience these different kinds of pain’ (Alex ).

Students are motivated to engage in learning about the relationship between gender and pain, and their role in addressing key challenges

Many students who were well-informed about gender bias and pain had engaged in significant self-directed learning in their own time, without opportunity to discuss their learning formally with their peers or tutors: ‘ All those things I’ve just picked up from external sources, whether it’s on Twitter, or I read a paper on it, it’s never been formally taught to me’ (M ).

Students are motivated to learn about pain and gender in a more holistic way and expressed a desire to be part of a conversation regarding the manifestations of gender bias in relation to pain (‘ The most important thing is getting people aware of it… making young medics willing to talk about it. Because we’re all educated people. We’re all bright. We’re all, hopefully, kind and compassionate. And if we just would talk about it, we could probably get a decent way to fixing it without massive intervention’ (Peter)); and part of action to challenge identified inequalities (‘ The other thing that really is important to me, personally, is what we can do about it…. it gets quite repetitive and quite infuriating… I get the whole point of raising awareness and that it’s important that we know. But what is the point of me…going into clinical practice, knowing that women are generally discriminated against… if I can’t do anything about it?’ (Rory )).

The professorial influencer: senior role models, particularly within clinical environments, help create a hidden curriculum of gender bias in relation to pain

Students learnt about pain not only from their formal medical school teaching (which, as above, they see as limited) but also from the hidden curriculum. The hidden curriculum in relation to pain and gender bias manifests in several ways. Prominent in our data is the way in which the hidden curriculum of clinical environments communicates gendered stereotypes, and the significant influence of senior clinicians’ role modelling.

Understandings of pain and gender are shaped by the hidden curriculum’s communication of gendered stereotypes

Gendered stereotypes were present in students’ understanding of pain and were described by students as communicated through the hidden curriculum. Overall, women were perceived as ‘more anxious’ (Lucy ) than men, and more likely to ‘ moan’ about pain —‘Even the way I’ve just said it, moaning about pain, because that’s what’s ingrained to us’ (Jiva ).

Students perceived that women’s pain was more likely to be dismissed clinically: ‘ Patients are dismissed based off their pains’ (Aarya ); attributed erroneously to gynaecological causes: ‘ The amount of times I’ve had to go, ‘are you sure it’s not your period pain?’ I’m pretty sure the 30-year-old who’s been having 18 years, 12 periods a month, 18 years, she’s had over 200 of these things now. I’m pretty sure she knows it isn’t that. Why are we asking?’ (Peter ); and psychological origin: ‘ … it really saddens me that so many more women are likely to be misdiagnosed with anxiety (Krishna ). Where pain was discussed as psychological, it was sometimes associated with women ‘ over exaggerating’ (Jiva ) pain—as Akira puts it ‘ in the ward you learn how to distract the patients away from their pain… how you could divert their attention. It reveals them as well… a patient came in… they were in agony… distract them and then you can tell it’s not too bad’ .

The intersectionality of other characteristics, such as race, socioeconomic status, weight and disability status, also played a role in the students' perceptions of pain. Most students appreciated that bias was intersectional, and that individuals affected by many different types of bias would be most negatively affected in relation to diagnosis, treatment and management of pain: ‘ I think working class women of colour are probably the most affected when it comes to pain [management]’ (Jiva); ‘People of lower socioeconomic class, [there’s] a higher assumption they’re drug seeking’ (Peter ). Students were often aware of harmful bias relating to race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status and saw this manifest in their teaching and clinical experiences: ‘ We’re taught outdated science, like, oh, Black people have a higher tolerance for pain. That’s just frankly a lie that came from no science ever. But it’s still propagated and people still believe’ (Peter ).

It is important to note that not all students believed they had encountered gendered stereotypes in relation to pain in clinical practice, or in their university education: ‘ I haven’t picked up on patients being treated differently because of gender… the patient’s experiencing pain… you need to give them something to relieve that… their gender or any other specific characteristic isn’t important in that’ (Vanya ). Others recognised their lack of familiarity with gender bias may be due to their own limited awareness: ‘ Nothing I’ve seen myself… but often you read about things or hear about things other people have seen’ (Kaivalya ).

Senior clinicians often role model biased understandings of pain

Senior clinicians’ opinions and actions were greatly influential and are an aspect of the hidden curriculum that impacts student perceptions of gender and pain. Through these opinions and behaviours, students are exposed to negative stereotypes and biases regarding pain and its management in the clinical environment. Students reported witnessing a lack of empathy from clinicians that they suspected was a result of taught (‘ Medical school teaches you to dissociate, pain-wise’ (Jiva )) and necessary (‘ It’s either detach or let it affect you too much’ (Jiva )) detachment, dismissive attitudes regarding patient pain (‘ It has to be very, very severe before anyone takes it seriously’ (Shubhi )). There were many reports of instances where patient pain was inadequately managed, which students suspected to be as a result of bias—Michelle, for example, describes the following:

A young Black woman with sickle cell anaemia came in with the crises… she had a PCA [Patient Controlled Analgesia] set up… and was asking nurses again and again throughout the night and saying that she was pushing the button, she wasn’t getting pain relief… the nurses had been very dismissive and they came in the next morning and they found that the PCA wasn’t connected to the driver, so she’d been pushing this button again and again and obviously it hadn’t done anything at all…that really just shocked me, actually, that a ward that’s so pro… when given a young Black woman with a known terrible disease that needs adequate pain relief, they seemed to be just disbelieving her (Michelle).

Some students discussed bias in pain relating to disability status and weight and noted negative assumptions among senior clinicians, for example, if someone can mobilise, they are not in pain; if someone is fat, they could be doing more to improve their lifestyle and manage their pain. Akira comments on the management of pain in primary care: ‘ … they’re like, I can walk with a walking stick, and so maybe they [the General Practitioner] perceive their chronic pain less of a major thing’; whilst Alex notes bias regarding patients’ weight and doctors’ perceptions of lifestyle changes ‘ …. that culture of, well, if you hadn’t let yourself get like this then you wouldn’t be in pain’ .

For some students, witnessing the negative role modelling from their seniors motivated them to behave differently: ‘ My whole experience on that placement made me feel like I would never do that to my patients. I would never, even if I’m so busy and I’m running an hour late in my clinic, I’m never going to rush through a speculum exam. Because it can be traumatic’ (Andrea ). However, this was not echoed in all student accounts.

In this study, we set out to explore senior medical students’ perceptions of gender and pain using a qualitative approach, particularly in reference to how these perceptions relate to participants’ experiences of formal and hidden curricula within medical education. Our research identifies three key educational forces, which students experience of the relationship between gender and pain as they progress through medical education: the sociocultural influencer, the pedagogical influencer and the professorial influencer.

Our data reinforce existing literature to demonstrate the impact of social norms and diverse identities on perceptions of gender and pain; and significant gaps in formal curricula. Our data build on existing literature by revealing a nuanced hidden curriculum that sends biased messages to students regarding gender and pain. Students perceived the origin of many of these messages to be clinical environments, and the senior clinicians involved in their instruction. The output of these influencers is gendered stereotyping and a lack of focus on the holistic management of women’s pain. In this discussion, we explore in greater depth how our findings relate to wider literature and make recommendations for educators which we hope will positively influence educational strategies.

The sociocultural influencer

Our findings show that many medical students are aware of, and actively perceive, gender bias in relation to the diagnosis and management of pain. Assumptions relating to gender were influenced by social norms and learners’ own backgrounds. Interestingly, the likelihood that a student would report witnessing gender bias in patient care appeared to increase when students’ personal identities corresponded with those of the patients they were treating. This awareness is consistent with the literature on increased empathy where students and patients share experiences, 23 and literature on bias within healthcare practice more broadly 24 and adds further weight to the need for a diverse clinical workforce. 25 The creation of reflective spaces in which all students can explore their clinical experiences for instances of bias, and develop cultural competence, would be beneficial. This need aligns with a critical consciousness approach to medical education, where students are engaged in open dialogue to encourage critical thinking about personal and societal beliefs. 26

The pedagogical influencer

Our participants reported several gaps in their formal medical school curricula in relation to gender bias and pain. These gaps represent more than missing content, as curricula gaps inadvertently convey messages to students about the relative unimportance of the content that is missing— 27 for example, the importance of holistic pain management, chronic pain, the significance of patient perspectives regarding pain and the role of bias. This is an important way in which the hidden curriculum manifests in relation to gender bias and pain education. This suggestion has been reported previously in relation to chronic pain, 28 but not beyond this. Interestingly, many students noted a tension these various gaps established—between viewing pain as something which was objective (which they felt the formal curriculum emphasised through its focus on pharmacology, the assigning of numbers to rate the severity of pain and regarding treating underlying causes of pain) and viewing pain as subjectively experienced by each patient (which they had witnessed as important through personal and clinical experiences, given the patient perspective gap in their formal curricula). This tension led to confusion and conflict. To address this, we suggest formal curricula and assessments which emphasise holistic approaches to pain management and explore patients’ experiences of pain (eg, through the arts and humanities, 29 and the inclusion of patients (eg, those with chronic pain) in curricula design) 30 would be beneficial. Our data suggest that exploring bias and advocacy in relation to pain is also important and would be valued by students at an early stage of their training. Critically, the students in our study were motivated to learn about bias in relation to pain, many conducting their own self-study. It may also be useful to involve students in the cocreation of formal curricula to ensure educational material meets their learning needs.

The professorial influencer

Another impactful way in which the hidden curriculum manifested in our data was in relation to role modelling. Medical education literature documents the harmful impact of negative role modelling, 31 which our data supports in relation to perceptions of, and behaviours relating to, pain within clinical practice. Negative role modelling can be a result of poor awareness of bias, but also of system-level constraints such as a lack of time or resources. 12 Our data highlight a lack of opportunities for students to reflect on their experiences, consider their own biases and consider both possible reasons for, and how they might act when they witness poor experiences of pain management in practice. Reflection plays a critical role in student sensemaking and subsequent awareness of how to advocate for patients. 32 There is a pressing need to either create these reflective spaces (again, here, a critical consciousness approach would be beneficial), or integrate discussion regarding students’ experiences of role modelling and their own perceptions in relation to pain within existing reflective spaces. Critically, educators and practising clinicians represent a key target audience for faculty development relating to gender bias and pain, to increase awareness of the perception of their actions and develop strategies for discussing pain and bias with students, including discussing the impact of resource shortages. Perceptions and practice relating to gender bias and pain across the continuum of medical education careers is an important direction for future research.

Across our findings, we have summarised our recommendations for educational practice ( table 4 ).

Suggestions for educators and organisations based on these findings

Limitations

Though we recruited widely, our convenience sampling approach means that we are likely to have attracted students interested in the topics of gender bias and pain and so there is a risk that our findings overemphasise student awareness of bias. The comments regarding desired developments for formal medical school curricula are based on student perceptions of what is covered by their medical school curricula presently, rather than our own analysis of medical school curricula coverage and, as such, there may be disparities between these reports and actual coverage. Despite this, we believe students’ perceptions of their curricula here are important as such perceptions influence engagement and can be inferred to represent students’ take-home understandings of teaching. Some students declined to select a pseudonym, meaning that in some instances, selected pseudonyms are researcher generated. This risks some loss of participant voice in our findings, though it does not negate the value of the experiences reported.

Additionally, this cross-sectional research offers a particular, time-bound perspective on students’ experiences. Given the participants’ descriptions of how early experiences are important, and education on gender and pain is particularly lacking at early stages, future research could longitudinally explore medical students’ experiences and perceptions from an early stage of their education.

We have explored the ways in which senior medical students perceive the relationship between gender and pain, exploring their experiences of their formal medical school curricula, and the hidden curricula they are exposed to by way of their presence within university and clinical environments. As the first study, to our knowledge, to explore how the hidden curriculum of medical education shapes students’ experiences of care in relation to gender and pain, this paper offers important insight for educators and researchers regarding the varied ability of students to identify gender bias in action, the powerful messaging of curricula gaps and impact of negative role modelling. We suggest further integration of curricular content focused on bias and advocacy, patient perspectives, holistic pain management and reflective spaces which encourage critical consciousness development at early stages of medical school curricula might go some way to addressing the gender bias present in many healthcare systems globally.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication.

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

This study involves human participants and we received ethical approval following the Imperial College London Education Ethics Review Process (EERP) (approval number: 2223-013). Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.

Acknowledgments

The authors affiliated with Imperial College London would like to acknowledge the support of the Applied Health Research (ARC) programme for North West London.

• ↵ European institute of gender inequality . 2023 . Available : https://eige.europa.eu/thesaurus/terms/1155 [Accessed 03 Feb 2023 ].
• Gkiouleka A ,
• Milner A , et al
• Lodwick R ,
• Walters K , et al
• Strand NH ,
• Mariano ER ,
• Goree JH , et al
• Losin EAR ,
• Ashar YK , et al
• Schäfer G ,
• Prkachin KM ,
• Kaseweter KA , et al
• Samulowitz A ,
• Eriksson E , et al
• Brown MEL ,
• Heybourne A , et al
• Hafferty FW ,
• Gaufberg EH ,
• O’Donnell JF
• Murinson BB , Johns Hopkins Pain Curriculum Development Team
• Moretti C ,
• De Luca E ,
• D’Apice C , et al
• Dueñas AN ,
• Kehoe A , et al
• Charmer B ,
• Burton OE , et al
• Kirkham SR ,
• MacDonald-Emes J
• De Costa J , et al
• Stalmeijer RE ,
• Laughey WF ,
• Dueñas AN , et al
• Rowe Gorosh M ,
• Brady M , et al
• Gonzaga AMR ,
• Appiah-Pippim J ,
• Onumah CM , et al
• Bandini J ,
• Mitchell C ,
• Epstein-Peterson ZD , et al
• Webster F ,
• Bremner S ,
• Oosenbrug E , et al
• Quinton ND ,
• Bekker HL , et al
• Bazrafkan L ,
• Tabei SZ , et al
• Stewart T ,

X @Megan_EL_Brown, @Imperial_Medic

Contributors MELB and WL were responsible for conception of the research and MELB, WL, RP, SK were responsible for design. MELB, SBP and CC collected all study data. MELB, CC and SBP analysed all study data. MELB prepared the first draft of this paper and all other authors (CC, SBP, RP, SK and WL) revised the work. RP is the guarantor.

Funding This independent research was supported by a research grant from Reckitt. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of Reckitt. Grant number: N/A.

Disclaimer The views expressed in this publication are those of those author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Competing interests WL is a senior medical scientist at Reckitt, the funder of this research. This research is not focused on any of Reckitt’s products, and WL participated in his capacity as an independently qualified medical education researcher.

Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research. Refer to the Methods section for further details.

Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.

Read the full text or download the PDF:

• Our Mission

Helping Students Hone Their Critical Thinking Skills

Used consistently, these strategies can help middle and high school teachers guide students to improve much-needed skills.

Critical thinking skills are important in every discipline, at and beyond school. From managing money to choosing which candidates to vote for in elections to making difficult career choices, students need to be prepared to take in, synthesize, and act on new information in a world that is constantly changing.

While critical thinking might seem like an abstract idea that is tough to directly instruct, there are many engaging ways to help students strengthen these skills through active learning.

Make Time for Metacognitive Reflection

Create space for students to both reflect on their ideas and discuss the power of doing so. Show students how they can push back on their own thinking to analyze and question their assumptions. Students might ask themselves, “Why is this the best answer? What information supports my answer? What might someone with a counterargument say?”

Through this reflection, students and teachers (who can model reflecting on their own thinking) gain deeper understandings of their ideas and do a better job articulating their beliefs. In a world that is go-go-go, it is important to help students understand that it is OK to take a breath and think about their ideas before putting them out into the world. And taking time for reflection helps us more thoughtfully consider others’ ideas, too.

Teach Reasoning Skills 

Reasoning skills are another key component of critical thinking, involving the abilities to think logically, evaluate evidence, identify assumptions, and analyze arguments. Students who learn how to use reasoning skills will be better equipped to make informed decisions, form and defend opinions, and solve problems. 

One way to teach reasoning is to use problem-solving activities that require students to apply their skills to practical contexts. For example, give students a real problem to solve, and ask them to use reasoning skills to develop a solution. They can then present their solution and defend their reasoning to the class and engage in discussion about whether and how their thinking changed when listening to peers’ perspectives. 

A great example I have seen involved students identifying an underutilized part of their school and creating a presentation about one way to redesign it. This project allowed students to feel a sense of connection to the problem and come up with creative solutions that could help others at school. For more examples, you might visit PBS’s Design Squad , a resource that brings to life real-world problem-solving.

Ask Open-Ended Questions 

Moving beyond the repetition of facts, critical thinking requires students to take positions and explain their beliefs through research, evidence, and explanations of credibility. 

When we pose open-ended questions, we create space for classroom discourse inclusive of diverse, perhaps opposing, ideas—grounds for rich exchanges that support deep thinking and analysis. 

For example, “How would you approach the problem?” and “Where might you look to find resources to address this issue?” are two open-ended questions that position students to think less about the “right” answer and more about the variety of solutions that might already exist. 

Journaling, whether digitally or physically in a notebook, is another great way to have students answer these open-ended prompts—giving them time to think and organize their thoughts before contributing to a conversation, which can ensure that more voices are heard. 

Once students process in their journal, small group or whole class conversations help bring their ideas to life. Discovering similarities between answers helps reveal to students that they are not alone, which can encourage future participation in constructive civil discourse.

Teach Information Literacy 

Education has moved far past the idea of “Be careful of what is on Wikipedia, because it might not be true.” With AI innovations making their way into classrooms, teachers know that informed readers must question everything. 

Understanding what is and is not a reliable source and knowing how to vet information are important skills for students to build and utilize when making informed decisions. You might start by introducing the idea of bias: Articles, ads, memes, videos, and every other form of media can push an agenda that students may not see on the surface. Discuss credibility, subjectivity, and objectivity, and look at examples and nonexamples of trusted information to prepare students to be well-informed members of a democracy.

One of my favorite lessons is about the Pacific Northwest tree octopus . This project asks students to explore what appears to be a very real website that provides information on this supposedly endangered animal. It is a wonderful, albeit over-the-top, example of how something might look official even when untrue, revealing that we need critical thinking to break down “facts” and determine the validity of the information we consume. 

A fun extension is to have students come up with their own website or newsletter about something going on in school that is untrue. Perhaps a change in dress code that requires everyone to wear their clothes inside out or a change to the lunch menu that will require students to eat brussels sprouts every day. 

Giving students the ability to create their own falsified information can help them better identify it in other contexts. Understanding that information can be “too good to be true” can help them identify future falsehoods. 

Provide Diverse Perspectives 

Consider how to keep the classroom from becoming an echo chamber. If students come from the same community, they may have similar perspectives. And those who have differing perspectives may not feel comfortable sharing them in the face of an opposing majority. 

To support varying viewpoints, bring diverse voices into the classroom as much as possible, especially when discussing current events. Use primary sources: videos from YouTube, essays and articles written by people who experienced current events firsthand, documentaries that dive deeply into topics that require some nuance, and any other resources that provide a varied look at topics. 

I like to use the Smithsonian “OurStory” page , which shares a wide variety of stories from people in the United States. The page on Japanese American internment camps is very powerful because of its first-person perspectives. 

Practice Makes Perfect 

To make the above strategies and thinking routines a consistent part of your classroom, spread them out—and build upon them—over the course of the school year. You might challenge students with information and/or examples that require them to use their critical thinking skills; work these skills explicitly into lessons, projects, rubrics, and self-assessments; or have students practice identifying misinformation or unsupported arguments.

Critical thinking is not learned in isolation. It needs to be explored in English language arts, social studies, science, physical education, math. Every discipline requires students to take a careful look at something and find the best solution. Often, these skills are taken for granted, viewed as a by-product of a good education, but true critical thinking doesn’t just happen. It requires consistency and commitment.

In a moment when information and misinformation abound, and students must parse reams of information, it is imperative that we support and model critical thinking in the classroom to support the development of well-informed citizens.

The Importance of Critical Thinking Skills for Students

Link Copied

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Brains at Work!

If you’re moving toward the end of your high school career, you’ve likely heard a lot about college life and how different it is from high school. Classes are more intense, professors are stricter, and the curriculum is more complicated. All in all, it’s very different compared to high school.

Different doesn’t have to mean scary, though. If you’re nervous about beginning college and you’re worried about how you’ll learn in a place so different from high school, there are steps you can take to help you thrive in your college career.

If you’re wondering how to get accepted into college and how to succeed as a freshman in such a new environment, the answer is simple: harness the power of critical thinking skills for students.

What is critical thinking?

Critical thinking entails using reasoning and the questioning of assumptions to address problems, assess information, identify biases, and more. It's a skillset crucial for students navigating their academic journey and beyond, including how to get accepted into college . At its crux, critical thinking for students has everything to do with self-discipline and making active decisions to 'think outside the box,' allowing individuals to think beyond a concept alone in order to understand it better.

Critical thinking skills for students is a concept highly encouraged in any and every educational setting, and with good reason. Possessing strong critical thinking skills will make you a better student and, frankly, help you gain valuable life skills. Not only will you be more efficient in gathering knowledge and processing information, but you will also enhance your ability to analyse and comprehend it.

Importance of critical thinking for students

Developing critical thinking skills for students is essential for success at all academic levels, particularly in college. It introduces reflection and perspective while encouraging you to question what you’re learning! Even if you’ve seen solid facts. Asking questions, considering other perspectives, and self-reflection cultivate resilient students with endless potential for learning, retention, and personal growth.A well-developed set of critical thinking skills for students will help them excel in many areas. Here are some critical thinking examples for students:

1. Decision-making

If you’re thinking critically, you’re not making impulse decisions or snap judgments; you’re taking the time to weigh the pros and cons. You’re making informed decisions. Critical thinking skills for students can make all the difference.

2. Problem-solving

Students with critical thinking skills are more effective in problem-solving. This reflective thinking process helps you use your own experiences to ideate innovations, solutions, and decisions.

3. Communication

Strong communication skills are a vital aspect of critical thinking for students, helping with their overall critical thinking abilities. How can you learn without asking questions? Critical thinking for students is what helps them produce the questions they may not have ever thought to ask. As a critical thinker, you’ll get better at expressing your ideas concisely and logically, facilitating thoughtful discussion, and learning from your teachers and peers.

4. Analytical skills

Developing analytical skills is a key component of strong critical thinking skills for students. It goes beyond study tips on reviewing data or learning a concept. It’s about the “Who? What? Where? Why? When? How?” When you’re thinking critically, these questions will come naturally, and you’ll be an expert learner because of it.

How can students develop critical thinking skills

Although critical thinking skills for students is an important and necessary process, it isn’t necessarily difficult to develop these observational skills. All it takes is a conscious effort and a little bit of practice. Here are a few tips to get you started:

1. Never stop asking questions

This is the best way to learn critical thinking skills for students. As stated earlier, ask questions—even if you’re presented with facts to begin with. When you’re examining a problem or learning a concept, ask as many questions as you can. Not only will you be better acquainted with what you’re learning, but it’ll soon become second nature to follow this process in every class you take and help you improve your GPA .

2. Practice active listening

As important as asking questions is, it is equally vital to be a good listener to your peers. It is astounding how much we can learn from each other in a collaborative environment! Diverse perspectives are key to fostering critical thinking skills for students. Keep an open mind and view every discussion as an opportunity to learn.

3. Dive into your creativity

Although a college environment is vastly different from high school classrooms, one thing remains constant through all levels of education: the importance of creativity. Creativity is a guiding factor through all facets of critical thinking skills for students. It fosters collaborative discussion, innovative solutions, and thoughtful analyses.

4. Engage in debates and discussions

Participating in debates and discussions helps you articulate your thoughts clearly and consider opposing viewpoints. It challenges the critical thinking skills of students about the evidence presented, decoding arguments, and constructing logical reasoning. Look for debates and discussion opportunities in class, online forums, or extracurricular activities.

5. Look out for diverse sources of information 

In today's digital age, information is easily available from a variety of sources. Make it a habit to explore different opinions, perspectives, and sources of information. This not only broadens one's understanding of a subject but also helps in distinguishing between reliable and biased sources, honing the critical thinking skills of students.

Unlock the power of critical thinking skills while enjoying a seamless student living experience!

Book through amber today!

6. Practice problem-solving

Try engaging in challenging problems, riddles or puzzles that require critical thinking skills for students to solve. Whether it's solving mathematical equations, tackling complex scenarios in literature, or analysing data in science experiments, regular practice of problem-solving tasks sharpens your analytical skills. It enhances your ability to think critically under pressure.

Nurturing critical thinking skills helps students with the tools to navigate the complexities of academia and beyond. By learning active listening, curiosity, creativity, and problem-solving, students can create a sturdy foundation for lifelong learning. By building upon all these skills, you’ll be an expert critical thinker in no time—and you’ll be ready to conquer all that college has to offer! 

Frequently Asked Questions

What questions should i ask to be a better critical thinker, how can i sharpen critical thinking skills for students, how do i avoid bias, can i use my critical thinking skills outside of school, will critical thinking skills help students in their future careers.

Your ideal student home & a flight ticket awaits

Follow us on :

Related Posts

Top 20 STAR Interview Questions and Answers for Success

12 Best Thrift Stores in Manchester: How to Style on Budget?

What Is the Importance of Personal Development And What Is It?

amber © 2024. All rights reserved.

4.8/5 on Trustpilot

Rated as "Excellent" • 4800+ Reviews by students

Rated as "Excellent" • 4800+ Reviews by Students

Classroom Q&A

With larry ferlazzo.

In this EdWeek blog, an experiment in knowledge-gathering, Ferlazzo will address readers’ questions on classroom management, ELL instruction, lesson planning, and other issues facing teachers. Send your questions to [email protected]. Read more from this blog.

Integrating Critical Thinking Into the Classroom

• Share article

(This is the second post in a three-part series. You can see Part One here .)

The new question-of-the-week is:

What is critical thinking and how can we integrate it into the classroom?

Part One ‘s guests were Dara Laws Savage, Patrick Brown, Meg Riordan, Ph.D., and Dr. PJ Caposey. Dara, Patrick, and Meg were also guests on my 10-minute BAM! Radio Show . You can also find a list of, and links to, previous shows here.

Today, Dr. Kulvarn Atwal, Elena Quagliarello, Dr. Donna Wilson, and Diane Dahl share their recommendations.

‘Learning Conversations’

Dr. Kulvarn Atwal is currently the executive head teacher of two large primary schools in the London borough of Redbridge. Dr. Atwal is the author of The Thinking School: Developing a Dynamic Learning Community , published by John Catt Educational. Follow him on Twitter @Thinkingschool2 :

In many classrooms I visit, students’ primary focus is on what they are expected to do and how it will be measured. It seems that we are becoming successful at producing students who are able to jump through hoops and pass tests. But are we producing children that are positive about teaching and learning and can think critically and creatively? Consider your classroom environment and the extent to which you employ strategies that develop students’ critical-thinking skills and their self-esteem as learners.

Development of self-esteem

One of the most significant factors that impacts students’ engagement and achievement in learning in your classroom is their self-esteem. In this context, self-esteem can be viewed to be the difference between how they perceive themselves as a learner (perceived self) and what they consider to be the ideal learner (ideal self). This ideal self may reflect the child that is associated or seen to be the smartest in the class. Your aim must be to raise students’ self-esteem. To do this, you have to demonstrate that effort, not ability, leads to success. Your language and interactions in the classroom, therefore, have to be aspirational—that if children persist with something, they will achieve.

Use of evaluative praise

Ensure that when you are praising students, you are making explicit links to a child’s critical thinking and/or development. This will enable them to build their understanding of what factors are supporting them in their learning. For example, often when we give feedback to students, we may simply say, “Well done” or “Good answer.” However, are the students actually aware of what they did well or what was good about their answer? Make sure you make explicit what the student has done well and where that links to prior learning. How do you value students’ critical thinking—do you praise their thinking and demonstrate how it helps them improve their learning?

Learning conversations to encourage deeper thinking

We often feel as teachers that we have to provide feedback to every students’ response, but this can limit children’s thinking. Encourage students in your class to engage in learning conversations with each other. Give as many opportunities as possible to students to build on the responses of others. Facilitate chains of dialogue by inviting students to give feedback to each other. The teacher’s role is, therefore, to facilitate this dialogue and select each individual student to give feedback to others. It may also mean that you do not always need to respond at all to a student’s answer.

Teacher modelling own thinking

We cannot expect students to develop critical-thinking skills if we aren’t modeling those thinking skills for them. Share your creativity, imagination, and thinking skills with the students and you will nurture creative, imaginative critical thinkers. Model the language you want students to learn and think about. Share what you feel about the learning activities your students are participating in as well as the thinking you are engaging in. Your own thinking and learning will add to the discussions in the classroom and encourage students to share their own thinking.

Metacognitive questioning

Consider the extent to which your questioning encourages students to think about their thinking, and therefore, learn about learning! Through asking metacognitive questions, you will enable your students to have a better understanding of the learning process, as well as their own self-reflections as learners. Example questions may include:

• Why did you choose to do it that way?
• When you find something tricky, what helps you?
• How do you know when you have really learned something?

‘Adventures of Discovery’

Elena Quagliarello is the senior editor of education for Scholastic News , a current events magazine for students in grades 3–6. She graduated from Rutgers University, where she studied English and earned her master’s degree in elementary education. She is a certified K–12 teacher and previously taught middle school English/language arts for five years:

Critical thinking blasts through the surface level of a topic. It reaches beyond the who and the what and launches students on a learning journey that ultimately unlocks a deeper level of understanding. Teaching students how to think critically helps them turn information into knowledge and knowledge into wisdom. In the classroom, critical thinking teaches students how to ask and answer the questions needed to read the world. Whether it’s a story, news article, photo, video, advertisement, or another form of media, students can use the following critical-thinking strategies to dig beyond the surface and uncover a wealth of knowledge.

A Layered Learning Approach

Begin by having students read a story, article, or analyze a piece of media. Then have them excavate and explore its various layers of meaning. First, ask students to think about the literal meaning of what they just read. For example, if students read an article about the desegregation of public schools during the 1950s, they should be able to answer questions such as: Who was involved? What happened? Where did it happen? Which details are important? This is the first layer of critical thinking: reading comprehension. Do students understand the passage at its most basic level?

Ask the Tough Questions

The next layer delves deeper and starts to uncover the author’s purpose and craft. Teach students to ask the tough questions: What information is included? What or who is left out? How does word choice influence the reader? What perspective is represented? What values or people are marginalized? These questions force students to critically analyze the choices behind the final product. In today’s age of fast-paced, easily accessible information, it is essential to teach students how to critically examine the information they consume. The goal is to equip students with the mindset to ask these questions on their own.

Strike Gold

The deepest layer of critical thinking comes from having students take a step back to think about the big picture. This level of thinking is no longer focused on the text itself but rather its real-world implications. Students explore questions such as: Why does this matter? What lesson have I learned? How can this lesson be applied to other situations? Students truly engage in critical thinking when they are able to reflect on their thinking and apply their knowledge to a new situation. This step has the power to transform knowledge into wisdom.

Adventures of Discovery

There are vast ways to spark critical thinking in the classroom. Here are a few other ideas:

• Critical Expressionism: In this expanded response to reading from a critical stance, students are encouraged to respond through forms of artistic interpretations, dramatizations, singing, sketching, designing projects, or other multimodal responses. For example, students might read an article and then create a podcast about it or read a story and then act it out.
• Transmediations: This activity requires students to take an article or story and transform it into something new. For example, they might turn a news article into a cartoon or turn a story into a poem. Alternatively, students may rewrite a story by changing some of its elements, such as the setting or time period.
• Words Into Action: In this type of activity, students are encouraged to take action and bring about change. Students might read an article about endangered orangutans and the effects of habitat loss caused by deforestation and be inspired to check the labels on products for palm oil. They might then write a letter asking companies how they make sure the palm oil they use doesn’t hurt rain forests.
• Socratic Seminars: In this student-led discussion strategy, students pose thought-provoking questions to each other about a topic. They listen closely to each other’s comments and think critically about different perspectives.
• Classroom Debates: Aside from sparking a lively conversation, classroom debates naturally embed critical-thinking skills by asking students to formulate and support their own opinions and consider and respond to opposing viewpoints.

Critical thinking has the power to launch students on unforgettable learning experiences while helping them develop new habits of thought, reflection, and inquiry. Developing these skills prepares students to examine issues of power and promote transformative change in the world around them.

‘Quote Analysis’

Dr. Donna Wilson is a psychologist and the author of 20 books, including Developing Growth Mindsets , Teaching Students to Drive Their Brains , and Five Big Ideas for Effective Teaching (2 nd Edition). She is an international speaker who has worked in Asia, the Middle East, Australia, Europe, Jamaica, and throughout the U.S. and Canada. Dr. Wilson can be reached at [email protected] ; visit her website at www.brainsmart.org .

Diane Dahl has been a teacher for 13 years, having taught grades 2-4 throughout her career. Mrs. Dahl currently teaches 3rd and 4th grade GT-ELAR/SS in Lovejoy ISD in Fairview, Texas. Follow her on Twitter at @DahlD, and visit her website at www.fortheloveofteaching.net :

A growing body of research over the past several decades indicates that teaching students how to be better thinkers is a great way to support them to be more successful at school and beyond. In the book, Teaching Students to Drive Their Brains , Dr. Wilson shares research and many motivational strategies, activities, and lesson ideas that assist students to think at higher levels. Five key strategies from the book are as follows:

• Facilitate conversation about why it is important to think critically at school and in other contexts of life. Ideally, every student will have a contribution to make to the discussion over time.
• Begin teaching thinking skills early in the school year and as a daily part of class.
• As this instruction begins, introduce students to the concept of brain plasticity and how their brilliant brains change during thinking and learning. This can be highly motivational for students who do not yet believe they are good thinkers!
• Explicitly teach students how to use the thinking skills.
• Facilitate student understanding of how the thinking skills they are learning relate to their lives at school and in other contexts.

Below are two lessons that support critical thinking, which can be defined as the objective analysis and evaluation of an issue in order to form a judgment.

Mrs. Dahl prepares her 3rd and 4th grade classes for a year of critical thinking using quote analysis .

During Native American studies, her 4 th grade analyzes a Tuscarora quote: “Man has responsibility, not power.” Since students already know how the Native Americans’ land had been stolen, it doesn’t take much for them to make the logical leaps. Critical-thought prompts take their thinking even deeper, especially at the beginning of the year when many need scaffolding. Some prompts include:

• … from the point of view of the Native Americans?
• … from the point of view of the settlers?
• How do you think your life might change over time as a result?
• Can you relate this quote to anything else in history?

Analyzing a topic from occupational points of view is an incredibly powerful critical-thinking tool. After learning about the Mexican-American War, Mrs. Dahl’s students worked in groups to choose an occupation with which to analyze the war. The chosen occupations were: anthropologist, mathematician, historian, archaeologist, cartographer, and economist. Then each individual within each group chose a different critical-thinking skill to focus on. Finally, they worked together to decide how their occupation would view the war using each skill.

For example, here is what each student in the economist group wrote:

• When U.S.A. invaded Mexico for land and won, Mexico ended up losing income from the settlements of Jose de Escandon. The U.S.A. thought that they were gaining possible tradable land, while Mexico thought that they were losing precious land and resources.
• Whenever Texas joined the states, their GDP skyrocketed. Then they went to war and spent money on supplies. When the war was resolving, Texas sold some of their land to New Mexico for $10 million. This allowed Texas to pay off their debt to the U.S., improving their relationship.
• A detail that converged into the Mexican-American War was that Mexico and the U.S. disagreed on the Texas border. With the resulting treaty, Texas ended up gaining more land and economic resources.
• Texas gained land from Mexico since both countries disagreed on borders. Texas sold land to New Mexico, which made Texas more economically structured and allowed them to pay off their debt.

This was the first time that students had ever used the occupations technique. Mrs. Dahl was astonished at how many times the kids used these critical skills in other areas moving forward.

Thanks to Dr. Auwal, Elena, Dr. Wilson, and Diane for their contributions!

Please feel free to leave a comment with your reactions to the topic or directly to anything that has been said in this post.

Consider contributing a question to be answered in a future post. You can send one to me at [email protected] . When you send it in, let me know if I can use your real name if it’s selected or if you’d prefer remaining anonymous and have a pseudonym in mind.

You can also contact me on Twitter at @Larryferlazzo .

Education Week has published a collection of posts from this blog, along with new material, in an e-book form. It’s titled Classroom Management Q&As: Expert Strategies for Teaching .

Just a reminder; you can subscribe and receive updates from this blog via email (The RSS feed for this blog, and for all Ed Week articles, has been changed by the new redesign—new ones won’t be available until February). And if you missed any of the highlights from the first nine years of this blog, you can see a categorized list below.

• This Year’s Most Popular Q&A Posts
• Race & Racism in Schools
• School Closures & the Coronavirus Crisis
• Classroom-Management Advice
• Best Ways to Begin the School Year
• Best Ways to End the School Year
• Student Motivation & Social-Emotional Learning
• Implementing the Common Core
• Facing Gender Challenges in Education
• Teaching Social Studies
• Cooperative & Collaborative Learning
• Using Tech in the Classroom
• Student Voices
• Parent Engagement in Schools
• Teaching English-Language Learners
• Reading Instruction
• Writing Instruction
• Education Policy Issues
• Differentiating Instruction
• Math Instruction
• Science Instruction
• Advice for New Teachers
• Author Interviews
• Entering the Teaching Profession
• The Inclusive Classroom
• Learning & the Brain
• Administrator Leadership
• Teacher Leadership
• Relationships in Schools
• Professional Development
• Instructional Strategies
• Best of Classroom Q&A
• Professional Collaboration
• Classroom Organization
• Mistakes in Education
• Project-Based Learning

I am also creating a Twitter list including all contributors to this column .

The opinions expressed in Classroom Q&A With Larry Ferlazzo are strictly those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.

Sign Up for EdWeek Update

Edweek top school jobs.

Sign Up & Sign In

BLOG | PODCAST NETWORK | ADMIN. MASTERMIND | SWAG & MERCH | ONLINE TRAINING

• Meet the Team
• Join the Team
• Our Philosophy
• Teach Better Mindset
• Custom Professional Development
• Livestream Shows & Videos
• Administrator Mastermind
• Academy Online Courses
• EDUcreator Club+
• Podcast Network
• Speakers Network
• Free Downloads
• Ambassador Program
• Free Facebook Group
• Professional Development
• Request Training
• Speakers Network Home
• Keynote Speakers

Strategies to Increase Critical Thinking Skills in students

Teach Better Team October 2, 2019 Blog , Engage Better , Lesson Plan Better , Personalize Student Learning Better

In This Post:

• The importance of helping students increase critical thinking skills.
• Ways to promote the essential skills needed to analyze and evaluate.
• Strategies to incorporate critical thinking into your instruction.

We ask our teachers to be “future-ready” or say that we are teaching “for jobs that don’t exist yet.” These are powerful statements. At the same time, they give teachers the impression that we have to drastically change what we are doing .

So how do we plan education for an unknown job market or unknown needs?

My answer: We can’t predict the jobs, but whatever they are, students will need to think critically to do them. So, our job is to teach our students HOW to think, not WHAT to think.

Helping Students Become Critical Thinkers

My answer is rooted in the call to empower our students to be critical thinkers. I believe that to be critical thinkers, educators need to provide students with the strategies they need. And we need to ask more than just surface-level questions.

Questions to students must motivate them to dig up background knowledge. They should inspire them to make connections to real-world scenarios. These make the learning more memorable and meaningful.

Critical thinking is a general term. I believe this term means that students effectively identify, analyze, and evaluate content or skills. In this process, they (the students) will discover and present convincing reasons in support of their answers or thinking.

You can look up critical thinking and get many definitions like this one from Wikipedia: “ Critical thinking consists of a mental process of analyzing or evaluating information, particularly statements or propositions that people have offered as true. ”

Essential Skills for Critical Thinking

In my current role as director of curriculum and instruction, I work to promote the use of 21st-century tools and, more importantly, thinking skills. Some essential skills that are the basis for critical thinking are:

• Communication and Information skills
• Thinking and Problem-Solving skills
• Interpersonal and Self- Directional skills
• Collaboration skills

These four bullets are skills students are going to need in any field and in all levels of education. Hence my answer to the question. We need to teach our students to think critically and for themselves.

One of the goals of education is to prepare students to learn through discovery . Providing opportunities to practice being critical thinkers will assist students in analyzing others’ thinking and examining the logic of others.

Understanding others is an essential skill in collaboration and in everyday life. Critical thinking will allow students to do more than just memorize knowledge.

Ask Questions

So how do we do this? One recommendation is for educators to work in-depth questioning strategies into a lesson launch.

Ask thoughtful questions to allow for answers with sound reasoning. Then, word conversations and communication to shape students’ thinking. Quick answers often result in very few words and no eye contact, which are skills we don’t want to promote.

When you are asking students questions and they provide a solution, try some of these to promote further thinking:

• Could you elaborate further on that point?
• Will you express that point in another way?
• Can you give me an illustration?
• Would you give me an example?
• Will you you provide more details?
• Could you be more specific?
• Do we need to consider another point of view?
• Is there another way to look at this question?

Utilizing critical thinking skills could be seen as a change in the paradigm of teaching and learning. Engagement in education will enhance the collaboration among teachers and students. It will also provide a way for students to succeed even if the school system had to start over.

[scroll down to keep reading]

Promoting critical thinking into all aspects of instruction.

Engagement, application, and collaboration are skills that withstand the test of time. I also promote the integration of critical thinking into every aspect of instruction.

In my experience, I’ve found a few ways to make this happen.

Begin lessons/units with a probing question: It shouldn’t be a question you can answer with a ‘yes’ or a ‘no.’ These questions should inspire discovery learning and problem-solving.

Encourage Creativity: I have seen teachers prepare projects before they give it to their students many times. For example, designing snowmen or other “creative” projects. By doing the design work or by cutting all the circles out beforehand, it removes creativity options.

It may help the classroom run more smoothly if every child’s material is already cut out, but then every student’s project looks the same. Students don’t have to think on their own or problem solve.

Not having everything “glue ready” in advance is a good thing. Instead, give students all the supplies needed to create a snowman, and let them do it on their own.

Giving independence will allow students to become critical thinkers because they will have to create their own product with the supplies you give them. This might be an elementary example, but it’s one we can relate to any grade level or project.

Try not to jump to help too fast – let the students work through a productive struggle .

Build in opportunities for students to find connections in learning.  Encouraging students to make connections to a real-life situation and identify patterns is a great way to practice their critical thinking skills. The use of real-world scenarios will increase rigor, relevance, and critical thinking.

A few other techniques to encourage critical thinking are:

• Use analogies
• Promote interaction among students
• Ask open-ended questions
• Allow reflection time
• Use real-life problems
• Allow for thinking practice

Critical thinking prepares students to think for themselves for the rest of their lives. I also believe critical thinkers are less likely to go along with the crowd because they think for themselves.

About Matthew X. Joseph, Ed.D.

Dr. Matthew X. Joseph has been a school and district leader in many capacities in public education over his 25 years in the field. Experiences such as the Director of Digital Learning and Innovation in Milford Public Schools (MA), elementary school principal in Natick, MA and Attleboro, MA, classroom teacher, and district professional development specialist have provided Matt incredible insights on how to best support teaching and learning. This experience has led to nationally publishing articles and opportunities to speak at multiple state and national events. He is the author of Power of Us: Creating Collaborative Schools and co-author of Modern Mentoring , Reimagining Teacher Mentorship (Due out, fall 2019). His master’s degree is in special education and his Ed.D. in Educational Leadership from Boston College.

Visit Matthew’s Blog

Critical thinking definition

Critical thinking, as described by Oxford Languages, is the objective analysis and evaluation of an issue in order to form a judgement.

Active and skillful approach, evaluation, assessment, synthesis, and/or evaluation of information obtained from, or made by, observation, knowledge, reflection, acumen or conversation, as a guide to belief and action, requires the critical thinking process, which is why it's often used in education and academics.

Some even may view it as a backbone of modern thought.

However, it's a skill, and skills must be trained and encouraged to be used at its full potential.

People turn up to various approaches in improving their critical thinking, like:

• Developing technical and problem-solving skills
• Engaging in more active listening
• Actively questioning their assumptions and beliefs
• Seeking out more diversity of thought
• Opening up their curiosity in an intellectual way etc.

Is critical thinking useful in writing?

Critical thinking can help in planning your paper and making it more concise, but it's not obvious at first. We carefully pinpointed some the questions you should ask yourself when boosting critical thinking in writing:

• What information should be included?
• Which information resources should the author look to?
• What degree of technical knowledge should the report assume its audience has?
• What is the most effective way to show information?
• How should the report be organized?
• How should it be designed?
• What tone and level of language difficulty should the document have?

Usage of critical thinking comes down not only to the outline of your paper, it also begs the question: How can we use critical thinking solving problems in our writing's topic?

Let's say, you have a Powerpoint on how critical thinking can reduce poverty in the United States. You'll primarily have to define critical thinking for the viewers, as well as use a lot of critical thinking questions and synonyms to get them to be familiar with your methods and start the thinking process behind it.

Are there any services that can help me use more critical thinking?

We understand that it's difficult to learn how to use critical thinking more effectively in just one article, but our service is here to help.

We are a team specializing in writing essays and other assignments for college students and all other types of customers who need a helping hand in its making. We cover a great range of topics, offer perfect quality work, always deliver on time and aim to leave our customers completely satisfied with what they ordered.

The ordering process is fully online, and it goes as follows:

• Select the topic and the deadline of your essay.
• Provide us with any details, requirements, statements that should be emphasized or particular parts of the essay writing process you struggle with.
• Leave the email address, where your completed order will be sent to.
• Select your prefered payment type, sit back and relax!

With lots of experience on the market, professionally degreed essay writers , online 24/7 customer support and incredibly low prices, you won't find a service offering a better deal than ours.

Home > Blog > Tips for Online Students > Why Is Critical Thinking Important and How to Improve It

Tips for Online Students , Tips for Students

Why Is Critical Thinking Important and How to Improve It

Updated: July 8, 2024

Published: April 2, 2020

Why is critical thinking important? The decisions that you make affect your quality of life. And if you want to ensure that you live your best, most successful and happy life, you’re going to want to make conscious choices. That can be done with a simple thing known as critical thinking. Here’s how to improve your critical thinking skills and make decisions that you won’t regret.

What Is Critical Thinking?

Critical thinking is the process of analyzing facts to form a judgment. Essentially, it involves thinking about thinking. Historically, it dates back to the teachings of Socrates , as documented by Plato.

Today, it is seen as a complex concept understood best by philosophers and psychologists. Modern definitions include “reasonable, reflective thinking focused on deciding what to believe or do” and “deciding what’s true and what you should do.”

The Importance Of Critical Thinking

Why is critical thinking important? Good question! Here are a few undeniable reasons why it’s crucial to have these skills.

1. Critical Thinking Is Universal

Critical thinking is a domain-general thinking skill. What does this mean? It means that no matter what path or profession you pursue, these skills will always be relevant and will always be beneficial to your success. They are not specific to any field.

2. Crucial For The Economy

Our future depends on technology, information, and innovation. Critical thinking is needed for our fast-growing economies, to solve problems as quickly and as effectively as possible.

3. Improves Language & Presentation Skills

In order to best express ourselves, we need to know how to think clearly and systematically — meaning practice critical thinking! Critical thinking also means knowing how to break down texts, and in turn, improve our ability to comprehend.

4. Promotes Creativity

By practicing critical thinking, we are allowing ourselves not only to solve problems but also to come up with new and creative ideas to do so. Critical thinking allows us to analyze these ideas and adjust them accordingly.

5. Important For Self-Reflection

Without critical thinking, how can we really live a meaningful life? We need this skill to self-reflect and justify our ways of life and opinions. Critical thinking provides us with the tools to evaluate ourselves in the way that we need to.

Photo by Marcelo Chagas from Pexels

6. the basis of science & democracy.

In order to have a democracy and to prove scientific facts, we need critical thinking in the world. Theories must be backed up with knowledge. In order for a society to effectively function, its citizens need to establish opinions about what’s right and wrong (by using critical thinking!).

Benefits Of Critical Thinking

We know that critical thinking is good for society as a whole, but what are some benefits of critical thinking on an individual level? Why is critical thinking important for us?

1. Key For Career Success

Critical thinking is crucial for many career paths. Not just for scientists, but lawyers , doctors, reporters, engineers , accountants, and analysts (among many others) all have to use critical thinking in their positions. In fact, according to the World Economic Forum, critical thinking is one of the most desirable skills to have in the workforce, as it helps analyze information, think outside the box, solve problems with innovative solutions, and plan systematically.

2. Better Decision Making

There’s no doubt about it — critical thinkers make the best choices. Critical thinking helps us deal with everyday problems as they come our way, and very often this thought process is even done subconsciously. It helps us think independently and trust our gut feeling.

3. Can Make You Happier!

While this often goes unnoticed, being in touch with yourself and having a deep understanding of why you think the way you think can really make you happier. Critical thinking can help you better understand yourself, and in turn, help you avoid any kind of negative or limiting beliefs, and focus more on your strengths. Being able to share your thoughts can increase your quality of life.

4. Form Well-Informed Opinions

There is no shortage of information coming at us from all angles. And that’s exactly why we need to use our critical thinking skills and decide for ourselves what to believe. Critical thinking allows us to ensure that our opinions are based on the facts, and help us sort through all that extra noise.

5. Better Citizens

One of the most inspiring critical thinking quotes is by former US president Thomas Jefferson: “An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people.” What Jefferson is stressing to us here is that critical thinkers make better citizens, as they are able to see the entire picture without getting sucked into biases and propaganda.

6. Improves Relationships

While you may be convinced that being a critical thinker is bound to cause you problems in relationships, this really couldn’t be less true! Being a critical thinker can allow you to better understand the perspective of others, and can help you become more open-minded towards different views.

7. Promotes Curiosity

Critical thinkers are constantly curious about all kinds of things in life, and tend to have a wide range of interests. Critical thinking means constantly asking questions and wanting to know more, about why, what, who, where, when, and everything else that can help them make sense of a situation or concept, never taking anything at face value.

8. Allows For Creativity

Critical thinkers are also highly creative thinkers, and see themselves as limitless when it comes to possibilities. They are constantly looking to take things further, which is crucial in the workforce.

9. Enhances Problem Solving Skills

Those with critical thinking skills tend to solve problems as part of their natural instinct. Critical thinkers are patient and committed to solving the problem, similar to Albert Einstein, one of the best critical thinking examples, who said “It’s not that I’m so smart; it’s just that I stay with problems longer.” Critical thinkers’ enhanced problem-solving skills makes them better at their jobs and better at solving the world’s biggest problems. Like Einstein, they have the potential to literally change the world.

10. An Activity For The Mind

Just like our muscles, in order for them to be strong, our mind also needs to be exercised and challenged. It’s safe to say that critical thinking is almost like an activity for the mind — and it needs to be practiced. Critical thinking encourages the development of many crucial skills such as logical thinking, decision making, and open-mindness.

11. Creates Independence

When we think critically, we think on our own as we trust ourselves more. Critical thinking is key to creating independence, and encouraging students to make their own decisions and form their own opinions.

12. Crucial Life Skill

Critical thinking is crucial not just for learning, but for life overall! Education isn’t just a way to prepare ourselves for life, but it’s pretty much life itself. Learning is a lifelong process that we go through each and every day.

How To Improve Your Critical Thinking

Now that you know the benefits of thinking critically, how do you actually do it?

• Define Your Question: When it comes to critical thinking, it’s important to always keep your goal in mind. Know what you’re trying to achieve, and then figure out how to best get there.
• Gather Reliable Information: Make sure that you’re using sources you can trust — biases aside. That’s how a real critical thinker operates!
• Ask The Right Questions: We all know the importance of questions, but be sure that you’re asking the right questions that are going to get you to your answer.
• Look Short & Long Term: When coming up with solutions, think about both the short- and long-term consequences. Both of them are significant in the equation.
• Explore All Sides: There is never just one simple answer, and nothing is black or white. Explore all options and think outside of the box before you come to any conclusions.

How Is Critical Thinking Developed At School?

Critical thinking is developed in nearly everything we do, but much of this essential skill is encouraged and practiced in school. Fostering a culture of inquiry is crucial, encouraging students to ask questions, analyze information, and evaluate evidence.

Teaching strategies like Socratic questioning, problem-based learning, and collaborative discussions help students think for themselves. When teachers ask questions, students can respond critically and reflect on their learning. Group discussions also expand their thinking, making them independent thinkers and effective problem solvers.

How Does Critical Thinking Apply To Your Career?

Critical thinking is a valuable asset in any career. Employers value employees who can think critically, ask insightful questions, and offer creative solutions. Demonstrating critical thinking skills can set you apart in the workplace, showing your ability to tackle complex problems and make informed decisions.

In many careers, from law and medicine to business and engineering, critical thinking is essential. Lawyers analyze cases, doctors diagnose patients, business analysts evaluate market trends, and engineers solve technical issues—all requiring strong critical thinking skills.

Critical thinking also enhances your ability to communicate effectively, making you a better team member and leader. By analyzing and evaluating information, you can present clear, logical arguments and make persuasive presentations.

Incorporating critical thinking into your career helps you stay adaptable and innovative. It encourages continuous learning and improvement, which are crucial for professional growth and success in a rapidly changing job market.

Photo by Oladimeji Ajegbile from Pexels

Critical thinking is a vital skill with far-reaching benefits for personal and professional success. It involves systematic skills such as analysis, evaluation, inference, interpretation, and explanation to assess information and arguments.

By gathering relevant data, considering alternative perspectives, and using logical reasoning, critical thinking enables informed decision-making. Reflecting on and refining these processes further enhances their effectiveness.

The future of critical thinking holds significant importance as it remains essential for adapting to evolving challenges and making sound decisions in various aspects of life.

What are the benefits of developing critical thinking skills?

Critical thinking enhances decision-making, problem-solving, and the ability to evaluate information critically. It helps in making informed decisions, understanding others’ perspectives, and improving overall cognitive abilities.

How does critical thinking contribute to problem-solving abilities?

Critical thinking enables you to analyze problems thoroughly, consider multiple solutions, and choose the most effective approach. It fosters creativity and innovative thinking in finding solutions.

What role does critical thinking play in academic success?

Critical thinking is crucial in academics as it allows you to analyze texts, evaluate evidence, construct logical arguments, and understand complex concepts, leading to better academic performance.

How does critical thinking promote effective communication skills?

Critical thinking helps you articulate thoughts clearly, listen actively, and engage in meaningful discussions. It improves your ability to argue logically and understand different viewpoints.

How can critical thinking skills be applied in everyday situations?

You can use critical thinking to make better personal and professional decisions, solve everyday problems efficiently, and understand the world around you more deeply.

What role does skepticism play in critical thinking?

Skepticism encourages questioning assumptions, evaluating evidence, and distinguishing between facts and opinions. It helps in developing a more rigorous and open-minded approach to thinking.

What strategies can enhance critical thinking?

Strategies include asking probing questions, engaging in reflective thinking, practicing problem-solving, seeking diverse perspectives, and analyzing information critically and logically.

In this article

At UoPeople, our blog writers are thinkers, researchers, and experts dedicated to curating articles relevant to our mission: making higher education accessible to everyone. Read More

Why Schools Need to Change Yes, We Can Define, Teach, and Assess Critical Thinking Skills

Jeff Heyck-Williams (He, His, Him) Director of the Two Rivers Learning Institute in Washington, DC

Today’s learners face an uncertain present and a rapidly changing future that demand far different skills and knowledge than were needed in the 20th century. We also know so much more about enabling deep, powerful learning than we ever did before. Our collective future depends on how well young people prepare for the challenges and opportunities of 21st-century life.

Critical thinking is a thing. We can define it; we can teach it; and we can assess it.

While the idea of teaching critical thinking has been bandied around in education circles since at least the time of John Dewey, it has taken greater prominence in the education debates with the advent of the term “21st century skills” and discussions of deeper learning. There is increasing agreement among education reformers that critical thinking is an essential ingredient for long-term success for all of our students.

However, there are still those in the education establishment and in the media who argue that critical thinking isn’t really a thing, or that these skills aren’t well defined and, even if they could be defined, they can’t be taught or assessed.

To those naysayers, I have to disagree. Critical thinking is a thing. We can define it; we can teach it; and we can assess it. In fact, as part of a multi-year Assessment for Learning Project , Two Rivers Public Charter School in Washington, D.C., has done just that.

Before I dive into what we have done, I want to acknowledge that some of the criticism has merit.

First, there are those that argue that critical thinking can only exist when students have a vast fund of knowledge. Meaning that a student cannot think critically if they don’t have something substantive about which to think. I agree. Students do need a robust foundation of core content knowledge to effectively think critically. Schools still have a responsibility for building students’ content knowledge.

However, I would argue that students don’t need to wait to think critically until after they have mastered some arbitrary amount of knowledge. They can start building critical thinking skills when they walk in the door. All students come to school with experience and knowledge which they can immediately think critically about. In fact, some of the thinking that they learn to do helps augment and solidify the discipline-specific academic knowledge that they are learning.

The second criticism is that critical thinking skills are always highly contextual. In this argument, the critics make the point that the types of thinking that students do in history is categorically different from the types of thinking students do in science or math. Thus, the idea of teaching broadly defined, content-neutral critical thinking skills is impossible. I agree that there are domain-specific thinking skills that students should learn in each discipline. However, I also believe that there are several generalizable skills that elementary school students can learn that have broad applicability to their academic and social lives. That is what we have done at Two Rivers.

Defining Critical Thinking Skills

We began this work by first defining what we mean by critical thinking. After a review of the literature and looking at the practice at other schools, we identified five constructs that encompass a set of broadly applicable skills: schema development and activation; effective reasoning; creativity and innovation; problem solving; and decision making.

We then created rubrics to provide a concrete vision of what each of these constructs look like in practice. Working with the Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning and Equity (SCALE) , we refined these rubrics to capture clear and discrete skills.

For example, we defined effective reasoning as the skill of creating an evidence-based claim: students need to construct a claim, identify relevant support, link their support to their claim, and identify possible questions or counter claims. Rubrics provide an explicit vision of the skill of effective reasoning for students and teachers. By breaking the rubrics down for different grade bands, we have been able not only to describe what reasoning is but also to delineate how the skills develop in students from preschool through 8th grade.

Before moving on, I want to freely acknowledge that in narrowly defining reasoning as the construction of evidence-based claims we have disregarded some elements of reasoning that students can and should learn. For example, the difference between constructing claims through deductive versus inductive means is not highlighted in our definition. However, by privileging a definition that has broad applicability across disciplines, we are able to gain traction in developing the roots of critical thinking. In this case, to formulate well-supported claims or arguments.

Teaching Critical Thinking Skills

The definitions of critical thinking constructs were only useful to us in as much as they translated into practical skills that teachers could teach and students could learn and use. Consequently, we have found that to teach a set of cognitive skills, we needed thinking routines that defined the regular application of these critical thinking and problem-solving skills across domains. Building on Harvard’s Project Zero Visible Thinking work, we have named routines aligned with each of our constructs.

For example, with the construct of effective reasoning, we aligned the Claim-Support-Question thinking routine to our rubric. Teachers then were able to teach students that whenever they were making an argument, the norm in the class was to use the routine in constructing their claim and support. The flexibility of the routine has allowed us to apply it from preschool through 8th grade and across disciplines from science to economics and from math to literacy.

Kathryn Mancino, a 5th grade teacher at Two Rivers, has deliberately taught three of our thinking routines to students using the anchor charts above. Her charts name the components of each routine and has a place for students to record when they’ve used it and what they have figured out about the routine. By using this structure with a chart that can be added to throughout the year, students see the routines as broadly applicable across disciplines and are able to refine their application over time.

Assessing Critical Thinking Skills

By defining specific constructs of critical thinking and building thinking routines that support their implementation in classrooms, we have operated under the assumption that students are developing skills that they will be able to transfer to other settings. However, we recognized both the importance and the challenge of gathering reliable data to confirm this.

With this in mind, we have developed a series of short performance tasks around novel discipline-neutral contexts in which students can apply the constructs of thinking. Through these tasks, we have been able to provide an opportunity for students to demonstrate their ability to transfer the types of thinking beyond the original classroom setting. Once again, we have worked with SCALE to define tasks where students easily access the content but where the cognitive lift requires them to demonstrate their thinking abilities.

These assessments demonstrate that it is possible to capture meaningful data on students’ critical thinking abilities. They are not intended to be high stakes accountability measures. Instead, they are designed to give students, teachers, and school leaders discrete formative data on hard to measure skills.

While it is clearly difficult, and we have not solved all of the challenges to scaling assessments of critical thinking, we can define, teach, and assess these skills . In fact, knowing how important they are for the economy of the future and our democracy, it is essential that we do.

Jeff Heyck-Williams (He, His, Him)

Director of the two rivers learning institute.

Jeff Heyck-Williams is the director of the Two Rivers Learning Institute and a founder of Two Rivers Public Charter School. He has led work around creating school-wide cultures of mathematics, developing assessments of critical thinking and problem-solving, and supporting project-based learning.

Read More About Why Schools Need to Change

AI in Schools Has Prevailed for a Full Year. What Happens Next?

August 13, 2024

Connections over Consequences: Effective Strategies for Collaborative Problem-Solving with Students

Sanchel Hall

August 6, 2024

Incorporating Leadership Skills into a Student-Centered Classroom

Elizabeth Lennon (she, her)

July 8, 2024

The Will to Teach

Critical Thinking in the Classroom: A Guide for Teachers

In the ever-evolving landscape of education, teaching students the skill of critical thinking has become a priority. This powerful tool empowers students to evaluate information, make reasoned judgments, and approach problems from a fresh perspective. In this article, we’ll explore the significance of critical thinking and provide effective strategies to nurture this skill in your students.

Why is Fostering Critical Thinking Important?

Strategies to cultivate critical thinking, real-world example, concluding thoughts.

Critical thinking is a key skill that goes far beyond the four walls of a classroom. It equips students to better understand and interact with the world around them. Here are some reasons why fostering critical thinking is important:

• Making Informed Decisions:  Critical thinking enables students to evaluate the pros and cons of a situation, helping them make informed and rational decisions.
• Developing Analytical Skills:  Critical thinking involves analyzing information from different angles, which enhances analytical skills.
• Promoting Independence:  Critical thinking fosters independence by encouraging students to form their own opinions based on their analysis, rather than relying on others.

Creating an environment that encourages critical thinking can be accomplished in various ways. Here are some effective strategies:

• Socratic Questioning:  This method involves asking thought-provoking questions that encourage students to think deeply about a topic. For example, instead of asking, “What is the capital of France?” you might ask, “Why do you think Paris became the capital of France?”
• Debates and Discussions:  Debates and open-ended discussions allow students to explore different viewpoints and challenge their own beliefs. For example, a debate on a current event can engage students in critical analysis of the situation.
• Teaching Metacognition:  Teaching students to think about their own thinking can enhance their critical thinking skills. This can be achieved through activities such as reflective writing or journaling.
• Problem-Solving Activities:  As with developing problem-solving skills , activities that require students to find solutions to complex problems can also foster critical thinking.

As a school leader, I’ve seen the transformative power of critical thinking. During a school competition, I observed a team of students tasked with proposing a solution to reduce our school’s environmental impact. Instead of jumping to obvious solutions, they critically evaluated multiple options, considering the feasibility, cost, and potential impact of each. They ultimately proposed a comprehensive plan that involved water conservation, waste reduction, and energy efficiency measures. This demonstrated their ability to critically analyze a problem and develop an effective solution.

Critical thinking is an essential skill for students in the 21st century. It equips them to understand and navigate the world in a thoughtful and informed manner. As a teacher, incorporating strategies to foster critical thinking in your classroom can make a lasting impact on your students’ educational journey and life beyond school.

1. What is critical thinking? Critical thinking is the ability to analyze information objectively and make a reasoned judgment.

2. Why is critical thinking important for students? Critical thinking helps students make informed decisions, develop analytical skills, and promotes independence.

3. What are some strategies to cultivate critical thinking in students? Strategies can include Socratic questioning, debates and discussions, teaching metacognition, and problem-solving activities.

4. How can I assess my students’ critical thinking skills? You can assess critical thinking skills through essays, presentations, discussions, and problem-solving tasks that require thoughtful analysis.

5. Can critical thinking be taught? Yes, critical thinking can be taught and nurtured through specific teaching strategies and a supportive learning environment.

Related Posts

7 simple strategies for strong student-teacher relationships.

Getting to know your students on a personal level is the first step towards building strong relationships. Show genuine interest in their lives outside the classroom.

Connecting Learning to Real-World Contexts: Strategies for Teachers

When students see the relevance of their classroom lessons to their everyday lives, they are more likely to be motivated, engaged, and retain information.

Encouraging Active Involvement in Learning: Strategies for Teachers

Active learning benefits students by improving retention of information, enhancing critical thinking skills, and encouraging a deeper understanding of the subject matter.

Collaborative and Cooperative Learning: A Guide for Teachers

These methods encourage students to work together, share ideas, and actively participate in their education.

Experiential Teaching: Role-Play and Simulations in Teaching

These interactive techniques allow students to immerse themselves in practical, real-world scenarios, thereby deepening their understanding and retention of key concepts.

Project-Based Learning Activities: A Guide for Teachers

Project-Based Learning is a student-centered pedagogy that involves a dynamic approach to teaching, where students explore real-world problems or challenges.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Schools & departments

Critical thinking

Advice and resources to help you develop your critical voice.

Developing critical thinking skills is essential to your success at University and beyond.  We all need to be critical thinkers to help us navigate our way through an information-rich world. 

Whatever your discipline, you will engage with a wide variety of sources of information and evidence.  You will develop the skills to make judgements about this evidence to form your own views and to present your views clearly.

One of the most common types of feedback received by students is that their work is ‘too descriptive’.  This usually means that they have just stated what others have said and have not reflected critically on the material.  They have not evaluated the evidence and constructed an argument.

What is critical thinking?

Critical thinking is the art of making clear, reasoned judgements based on interpreting, understanding, applying and synthesising evidence gathered from observation, reading and experimentation. Burns, T., & Sinfield, S. (2016)  Essential Study Skills: The Complete Guide to Success at University (4th ed.) London: SAGE, p94.

Being critical does not just mean finding fault.  It means assessing evidence from a variety of sources and making reasoned conclusions.  As a result of your analysis you may decide that a particular piece of evidence is not robust, or that you disagree with the conclusion, but you should be able to state why you have come to this view and incorporate this into a bigger picture of the literature.

Being critical goes beyond describing what you have heard in lectures or what you have read.  It involves synthesising, analysing and evaluating what you have learned to develop your own argument or position.

Critical thinking is important in all subjects and disciplines – in science and engineering, as well as the arts and humanities.  The types of evidence used to develop arguments may be very different but the processes and techniques are similar.  Critical thinking is required for both undergraduate and postgraduate levels of study.

What, where, when, who, why, how?

Purposeful reading can help with critical thinking because it encourages you to read actively rather than passively.  When you read, ask yourself questions about what you are reading and make notes to record your views.  Ask questions like:

• What is the main point of this paper/ article/ paragraph/ report/ blog?
• Who wrote it?
• Why was it written?
• When was it written?
• Has the context changed since it was written?
• Is the evidence presented robust?
• How did the authors come to their conclusions?
• Do you agree with the conclusions?
• What does this add to our knowledge?
• Why is it useful?

Our web page covering Reading at university includes a handout to help you develop your own critical reading form and a suggested reading notes record sheet.  These resources will help you record your thoughts after you read, which will help you to construct your argument. 

Reading at university

Developing an argument

Being a university student is about learning how to think, not what to think.  Critical thinking shapes your own values and attitudes through a process of deliberating, debating and persuasion.   Through developing your critical thinking you can move on from simply disagreeing to constructively assessing alternatives by building on doubts.

There are several key stages involved in developing your ideas and constructing an argument.  You might like to use a form to help you think about the features of critical thinking and to break down the stages of developing your argument.

Features of critical thinking (pdf)

Features of critical thinking (Word rtf)

Our webpage on Academic writing includes a useful handout ‘Building an argument as you go’.

Academic writing

You should also consider the language you will use to introduce a range of viewpoints and to evaluate the various sources of evidence.  This will help your reader to follow your argument.  To get you started, the University of Manchester's Academic Phrasebank has a useful section on Being Critical. 

Academic Phrasebank

Developing your critical thinking

Set yourself some tasks to help develop your critical thinking skills.  Discuss material presented in lectures or from resource lists with your peers.  Set up a critical reading group or use an online discussion forum.  Think about a point you would like to make during discussions in tutorials and be prepared to back up your argument with evidence.

For more suggestions:

Developing your critical thinking - ideas (pdf)

Developing your critical thinking - ideas (Word rtf)

Published guides

For further advice and more detailed resources please see the Critical Thinking section of our list of published Study skills guides.

Study skills guides  

This article was published on 2024-02-26

Distance Learning

Using technology to develop students’ critical thinking skills.

by Jessica Mansbach

What Is Critical Thinking?

Critical thinking is a higher-order cognitive skill that is indispensable to students, readying them to respond to a variety of complex problems that are sure to arise in their personal and professional lives. The  cognitive skills at the foundation of critical thinking are  analysis, interpretation, evaluation, explanation, inference, and self-regulation.  

When students think critically, they actively engage in these processes:

• Communication
• Problem-solving

To create environments that engage students in these processes, instructors need to ask questions, encourage the expression of diverse opinions, and involve students in a variety of hands-on activities that force them to be involved in their learning.

Types of Critical Thinking Skills

Instructors should select activities based on the level of thinking they want students to do and the learning objectives for the course or assignment. The chart below describes questions to ask in order to show that students can demonstrate different levels of critical thinking.

*Adapted from Brown University’s Harriet W Sheridan Center for Teaching and Learning

Using Online Tools to Teach Critical Thinking Skills

Online instructors can use technology tools to create activities that help students develop both lower-level and higher-level critical thinking skills.

• Example: Use Google Doc, a collaboration feature in Canvas, and tell students to keep a journal in which they reflect on what they are learning, describe the progress they are making in the class, and cite course materials that have been most relevant to their progress. Students can share the Google Doc with you, and instructors can comment on their work.
• Example: Use the peer review assignment feature in Canvas and manually or automatically form peer review groups. These groups can be anonymous or display students’ names. Tell students to give feedback to two of their peers on the first draft of a research paper. Use the rubric feature in Canvas to create a rubric for students to use. Show students the rubric along with the assignment instructions so that students know what they will be evaluated on and how to evaluate their peers.
• Example: Use the discussions feature in Canvas and tell students to have a debate about a video they watched. Pose the debate questions in the discussion forum, and give students instructions to take a side of the debate and cite course readings to support their arguments.  
• Example: Us e goreact , a tool for creating and commenting on online presentations, and tell students to design a presentation that summarizes and raises questions about a reading. Tell students to comment on the strengths and weaknesses of the author’s argument. Students can post the links to their goreact presentations in a discussion forum or an assignment using the insert link feature in Canvas.
• Example:  Use goreact, a narrated Powerpoint, or a Google Doc and instruct students to tell a story that informs readers and listeners about how the course content they are learning is useful in their professional lives. In the story, tell students to offer specific examples of readings and class activities that they are finding most relevant to their professional work. Links to the goreact presentation and Google doc can be submitted via a discussion forum or an assignment in Canvas. The Powerpoint file can be submitted via a discussion or submitted in an assignment.

Pulling it All Together

Critical thinking is an invaluable skill that students need to be successful in their professional and personal lives. Instructors can be thoughtful and purposeful about creating learning objectives that promote lower and higher-level critical thinking skills, and about using technology to implement activities that support these learning objectives. Below are some additional resources about critical thinking.

Additional Resources

Carmichael, E., & Farrell, H. (2012). Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Online Resources in Developing Student Critical Thinking: Review of Literature and Case Study of a Critical Thinking Online Site.  Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice ,  9 (1), 4.

Lai, E. R. (2011). Critical thinking: A literature review.  Pearson’s Research Reports ,  6 , 40-41.

Landers, H (n.d.). Using Peer Teaching In The Classroom. Retrieved electronically from https://tilt.colostate.edu/TipsAndGuides/Tip/180

Lynch, C. L., & Wolcott, S. K. (2001). Helping your students develop critical thinking skills (IDEA Paper# 37. In  Manhattan, KS: The IDEA Center.

Mandernach, B. J. (2006). Thinking critically about critical thinking: Integrating online tools to Promote Critical Thinking. Insight: A collection of faculty scholarship , 1 , 41-50.

Yang, Y. T. C., & Wu, W. C. I. (2012). Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-long experimental study. Computers & Education , 59 (2), 339-352.

Insight Assessment: Measuring Thinking Worldwide

http://www.insightassessment.com/

Michigan State University’s Office of Faculty  & Organizational Development, Critical Thinking: http://fod.msu.edu/oir/critical-thinking

The Critical Thinking Community

http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/defining-critical-thinking/766

Related Posts

Web 2.0 Digital Tools Selection: Online Presentation Tools

Ways to Use Panopto in Online Courses

Scripts, Images, Action!: Creating Quality Videos for MUS 370

Nebula: A Graphic Interface for Discussion Forums

9 responses to “ Using Technology To Develop Students’ Critical Thinking Skills ”

This is a great site for my students to learn how to develop critical thinking skills, especially in the STEM fields.

Great tools to help all learners at all levels… not everyone learns at the same rate.

Thanks for sharing the article. Is there any way to find tools which help in developing critical thinking skills to students?

Technology needs to be advance to develop the below factors:

Understand the links between ideas. Determine the importance and relevance of arguments and ideas. Recognize, build and appraise arguments.

Excellent share! Can I know few tools which help in developing critical thinking skills to students? Any help will be appreciated. Thanks!

• Pingback: EDTC 6431 – Module 4 – Designing Lessons That Use Critical Thinking | Mr.Reed Teaches Math
• Pingback: Homepage
• Pingback: Magacus | Pearltrees

Brilliant post. Will be sharing this on our Twitter (@refthinking). I would love to chat to you about our tool, the Thinking Kit. It has been specifically designed to help students develop critical thinking skills whilst they also learn about the topics they ‘need’ to.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

Educationise

11 Activities That Promote Critical Thinking In The Class

Ignite your child’s curiosity with our exclusive “Learning Adventures Activity Workbook for Kids” a perfect blend of education and adventure!

Critical thinking activities encourage individuals to analyze, evaluate, and synthesize information to develop informed opinions and make reasoned decisions. Engaging in such exercises cultivates intellectual agility, fostering a deeper understanding of complex issues and honing problem-solving skills for navigating an increasingly intricate world.

Through critical thinking, individuals empower themselves to challenge assumptions, uncover biases, and constructively contribute to discourse, thereby enriching both personal growth and societal progress.

Critical thinking serves as the cornerstone of effective problem-solving, enabling individuals to dissect challenges, explore diverse perspectives, and devise innovative solutions grounded in logic and evidence. For engaging problem solving activities, read our article problem solving activities that enhance student’s interest.

52 Critical Thinking Flashcards for Problem Solving

What is Critical Thinking?

Critical thinking is a 21st-century skill that enables a person to think rationally and logically in order to reach a plausible conclusion. A critical thinker assesses facts and figures and data objectively and determines what to believe and what not to believe. Critical thinking skills empower a person to decipher complex problems and make impartial and better decisions based on effective information.

More Articles from Educationise

• 10 Innovative Strategies for Promoting Critical Thinking in the Classroom
• How to Foster Critical Thinking Skills in Students? Creative Strategies and Real-World Examples
• 9 Must-Have AI Tools for Teachers to Create Interactive Learning Materials
• The Future of Education: 8 Predictions for the Next Decade
• The Latest in EdTech: 5 Innovative Tools and Technologies for the Classroom
• 8 Free Math Problem Solving Websites and Applications

Importance of Acquiring Critical Thinking Skills

Critical thinking skills cultivate habits of mind such as strategic thinking, skepticism, discerning fallacy from the facts, asking good questions and probing deep into the issues to find the truth. Acquiring critical thinking skills was never as valuable as it is today because of the prevalence of the modern knowledge economy.

Today, information and technology are the driving forces behind the global economy. To keep pace with ever-changing technology and new inventions, one has to be flexible enough to embrace changes swiftly.

Today critical thinking skills are one of the most sought-after skills by the companies. In fact, critical thinking skills are paramount not only for active learning and academic achievement but also for the professional career of the students.

The lack of critical thinking skills catalyzes memorization of the topics without a deeper insight, egocentrism, closed-mindedness, reduced student interest in the classroom and not being able to make timely and better decisions.

Incorporating critical thinking lessons into the curriculum equips students with the tools they need to navigate the complexities of the modern world, fostering a mindset that is adaptable, inquisitive, and capable of discerning truth from misinformation.

Benefits of Critical Thinking for Students

Certain strategies are more eloquent than others in teaching students how to think critically. Encouraging critical thinking in the classroom is indispensable for the learning and growth of the students. In this way, we can raise a generation of innovators and thinkers rather than followers. Some of the benefits offered by thinking critically in the classroom are given below:

• It allows a student to decipher problems and think through the situations in a disciplined and systematic manner
• Through a critical thinking ability, a student can comprehend the logical correlation between distinct ideas
• The student is able to rethink and re-justify his beliefs and ideas based on facts and figures
• Critical thinking skills make the students curious about things around them
• A student who is a critical thinker is creative and always strives to come up with out of the box solutions to intricate problems

Read our article: How to Foster Critical Thinking Skills in Students? Creative Strategies and Real-World Examples

• Critical thinking skills assist in the enhanced student learning experience in the classroom and prepares the students for lifelong learning and success
• The critical thinking process is the foundation of new discoveries and inventions in the world of science and technology
• The ability to think critically allows the students to think intellectually and enhances their presentation skills, hence they can convey their ideas and thoughts in a logical and convincing manner
• Critical thinking skills make students a terrific communicator because they have logical reasons behind their ideas

Critical Thinking Lessons and Activities

11 Activities that Promote Critical Thinking in the Class

We have compiled a list of 11 critical thinking activities for students that will facilitate you to promote critical thinking abilities in the students. By incorporating these activities, educators can introduce real-world examples of critical thinking in the classroom, empowering students to apply these skills in everyday situations.

We have also covered problem solving activities that enhance student’s interest in our another article. Click here to read it.

1. Worst Case Scenario

Divide students into teams and introduce each team with a hypothetical challenging scenario. Allocate minimum resources and time to each team and ask them to reach a viable conclusion using those resources.

The scenarios can include situations like stranded on an island or stuck in a forest. Students will come up with creative solutions to come out from the imaginary problematic situation they are encountering. Besides encouraging students to think critically, this activity will enhance teamwork, communication and problem-solving skills of the students.

This critical thinking activity not only pushes students to devise innovative solutions in challenging scenarios but also strengthens their teamwork, communication, and problem-solving abilities, making it an engaging and educational experience.

Read our article: 10 Innovative Strategies for Promoting Critical Thinking in the Classroom

2. If You Build It

It is a very flexible game that allows students to think creatively. To start this activity, divide students into groups. Give each group a limited amount of resources such as pipe cleaners, blocks, and marshmallows etc.

Every group is supposed to use these resources and construct a certain item such as building, tower or a bridge in a limited time. You can use a variety of materials in the classroom to challenge the students. This activity is helpful in promoting teamwork and creative skills among the students.

Incorporating critical thinking games like this into your classroom not only promotes teamwork and creativity but also challenges students to think outside the box as they work together to build their structures.

It is also one of the classics which can be used in the classroom to encourage critical thinking. Print pictures of objects, animals or concepts and start by telling a unique story about the printed picture. The next student is supposed to continue the story and pass the picture to the other student and so on.

This engaging exercise is one of the most effective critical thinking activities for kids, as it encourages them to use their creativity and problem-solving skills while working together to construct innovative structures with limited resources.

4. Keeping it Real

In this activity, you can ask students to identify a real-world problem in their schools, community or city. After the problem is recognized, students should work in teams to come up with the best possible outcome of that problem.

5. Save the Egg

Make groups of three or four in the class. Ask them to drop an egg from a certain height and think of creative ideas to save the egg from breaking. Students can come up with diverse ideas to conserve the egg like a soft-landing material or any other device. Remember that this activity can get chaotic, so select the area in the school that can be cleaned easily afterward and where there are no chances of damaging the school property.

6. Start a Debate

In this activity, the teacher can act as a facilitator and spark an interesting conversation in the class on any given topic. Give a small introductory speech on an open-ended topic. The topic can be related to current affairs, technological development or a new discovery in the field of science. Encourage students to participate in the debate by expressing their views and ideas on the topic. Conclude the debate with a viable solution or fresh ideas generated during the activity through brainstorming.

7. Create and Invent

This project-based learning activity is best for teaching in the engineering class. Divide students into groups. Present a problem to the students and ask them to build a model or simulate a product using computer animations or graphics that will solve the problem. After students are done with building models, each group is supposed to explain their proposed product to the rest of the class. The primary objective of this activity is to promote creative thinking and problem-solving skills among the students.

8. Select from Alternatives

This activity can be used in computer science, engineering or any of the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) classes. Introduce a variety of alternatives such as different formulas for solving the same problem, different computer codes, product designs or distinct explanations of the same topic.

Form groups in the class and ask them to select the best alternative. Each group will then explain its chosen alternative to the rest of the class with reasonable justification of its preference. During the process, the rest of the class can participate by asking questions from the group. This activity is very helpful in nurturing logical thinking and analytical skills among the students.

9. Reading and Critiquing

Present an article from a journal related to any topic that you are teaching. Ask the students to read the article critically and evaluate strengths and weaknesses in the article. Students can write about what they think about the article, any misleading statement or biases of the author and critique it by using their own judgments.

In this way, students can challenge the fallacies and rationality of judgments in the article. Hence, they can use their own thinking to come up with novel ideas pertaining to the topic.

10. Think Pair Share

In this activity, students will come up with their own questions. Make pairs or groups in the class and ask the students to discuss the questions together. The activity will be useful if the teacher gives students a topic on which the question should be based.

For example, if the teacher is teaching biology, the questions of the students can be based on reverse osmosis, human heart, respiratory system and so on. This activity drives student engagement and supports higher-order thinking skills among students.

11. Big Paper – Silent Conversation

Silence is a great way to slow down thinking and promote deep reflection on any subject. Present a driving question to the students and divide them into groups. The students will discuss the question with their teammates and brainstorm their ideas on a big paper.

After reflection and discussion, students can write their findings in silence. This is a great learning activity for students who are introverts and love to ruminate silently rather than thinking aloud.

Incorporating critical thinking activities for high school students, like silent reflection and group brainstorming, encourages deep thought and collaboration, making it an effective strategy for engaging both introverted and extroverted learners.

Finally, for students with critical thinking, you can go to GS-JJ.co m to customize exclusive rewards, which not only enlivens the classroom, but also promotes the development and training of students for critical thinking.

Share this:

Discover more from educationise.

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Type your email…

4 thoughts on “ 11 Activities That Promote Critical Thinking In The Class ”

• Pingback: What is Growth Mindset? 50+ Motivational Quotes on Growth Mindset - Educationise
• Pingback: 6 Steps To Implement Project-Based Learning In The Classroom - Educationise
• Pingback: Engaging Problem-Solving Activities That Spark Student Interest - Educationise

Thanks for the great article! Especially with the post-pandemic learning gap, these critical thinking skills are essential! It’s also important to teach them a growth mindset. If you are interested in that, please check out The Teachers’ Blog!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Online Students

For All Online Programs

International Students

On Campus, need or have Visa

Campus Students

For All Campus Programs

The Importance of Critical Thinking Skills, For Students and Ourselves

Critical thinking is a vital, yet often neglected, skill. In higher education, Chris Griffiths , author of “The Creative Thinking Handbook,” noted in a TLNT blog article that critical thinking is “the ability to think clearly and independently about a subject or problem ... (and the) consideration of multiple perspectives, the checking of biases, and a detailed understanding of relevant context.” Put more simply, it means objective analysis, but we often form judgments without that all-important objective evaluation.

Employers on the Southern New Hampshire University (SNHU) Social Sciences Advisory Board tell us that they need people with critical thinking skills, but applicants often lack this ability. Their desire for critical thinkers is reflected in current research showing that critical thinking is one skill that cannot be taken over by artificial intelligence (AI) and that higher education must take a proactive role in preparing students with this skill.

What Skills Do Critical Thinkers Have?

According to, Dr. Norman Herr , a professor of science education, critical thinking skills can be boiled down to the following key elements:

• Identification of premises and conclusions — Break arguments down into logical statements
• Clarification of arguments — Identify ambiguity in these stated assertions
• Establishment of facts — Search for contradictions to determine if an argument or theory is complete and reasonable
• Evaluation of logic — Use inductive or deductive reasoning to decide if conclusions drawn are adequately supported
• Final evaluation — Weigh the arguments against the evidence presented

When translated to the professional world, the National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE) identifies critical thinking as a top skill ( NACE PDF Source ). NACE said that students should be ready to demonstrate it by inclusive reasoning and judgement to make decisions and solve problems; analyzing and communicating information from multiple sources with awareness of biases that could impact outcomes; and communicating that information accurately to diverse groups of stakeholders.

As educators, we must teach our students those critical thinking skills and practice them ourselves to objectively analyze an onslaught of information. Ideas, especially plausible-sounding philosophies, should be challenged and put through rigorous credibility tests.

Red Flags for Unreliable Information

The School Library Journal lists four types of information that should raise red flags when we’re watching the news, reading social media, or at any point in our everyday lives when we’re confronted with something purported to be “fact:”

• Fake news , which refers to purported news that is demonstrably untrue.
• Misinformation , which is spread by those who don’t realize that it’s false or only partially true .
• Disinformation , which is deliberately spread by people who know that it’s not accurate and who want to spread a false message.
• Propaganda , which is information that is spread with a specific agenda. It may or may not be false, but it’s intended to get an emotional reaction.

These information types may overlap, especially with the extinction of local news sources. As of 2023, there were only 1,213 daily local newspapers left in the U.S., and they continue to disappear at a rate of two each week, according to a report from The State of Local News Project. The report also notes that there are over 200 counties with no local print, broadcast, or digital news outlets and over 1,500 with only one. This lack of access to local news is overwhelmingly found in high poverty areas, often with predominantly Black, Hispanic or Native-American populations.

This provides opportunities for biased websites to fill the gap; misinformation tracker NewsGuard said that there are almost 1,300 websites positioning themselves as local news while pushing political agendas.

Updated Tools to Support Critical Thinking

SNHU and other colleges and universities across the U.S. must use updated tools to help their students think critically about the information they consume. Currently, many institutions of higher learning fail to teach students how to identify misinformation sources.

AI acts as a cautionary example of the way in which the landscape can transform quickly and dramatically. Generative AI has the ability to converse on any topic and write in the style of anything from an essay to a news article with an air of authority. Griffiths noted that, while it mimics something written via independent thought, it’s regurgitating a mishmash of existing ideas drawn from its training data. It incorporates any biases in that data and even “hallucinates,” providing output as factual when it’s partially or entirely untrue.

Bad actors can leverage AI technology to create written, graphic and audio content that masquerades as real news. One relatively harmless example is the AI-generated photos that supposedly show Katy Perry attending the 2024 Met Gala. Although she was not there, the ruse was so convincing that it even fooled her mother. While the Perry pictures did not cause widespread harm, they show how easily bad actors can convince others of a deepfake’s authenticity. Videos can also be created or manipulated easily to create fake news stories like a supposed Tucker Carlson interview with a Pfizer official about a new FDA-approved diabetes cure. The “story” was actually an ad for an unproven dietary supplement.

As educators in institutions of higher education, we must afford learners as many opportunities as possible to hone their critical thinking skills when interacting with instructors and fellow students.

Greg Lukianoff and Johnathan Haidt, authors of "The Coddling of the American Mind,"  contend that “one of the most brilliant features of universities is that, when they are working properly, they are communities of scholars who cancel out one another’s confirmation biases .”

Without exploring opposing viewpoints, students may fall prey to confirmation bias, further cementing ideas that they already believe to be true. Being inclusive when it comes to viewpoint diversity is indispensable for avoiding these echo chambers that circumvent having one’s ideas challenged.

How to Think Critically

As we teach our students the importance of critical thinking, how do we equip them to sift through the onslaught of information they encounter every day, both personally and in their educational pursuits? And how do we do the same for ourselves?

Here are four critical thinking examples that anyone can apply when evaluating information:

Consider Vested Interest

Consider whether the person who wrote or is sharing the information has any vested interest in doing so. For example, a writer may have a degree and professional experience that gives them expertise to write an article on specific communication techniques.

Be aware that the writer’s credibility can be affected by outside interests. These include being paid to write a book with a certain viewpoint, giving paid seminars, affiliation with certain organizations or anything else that creates a financial or personal interest in promoting a specific perspective.

Examine Biases

Consider the venue in which the person is sharing the information. Newscasts and newspapers once were slanted more toward neutrality, although there was never an era when bias was completely absent. The 19th century even had its own version of clickbait in the form of yellow journalism .

Today, it’s getting more difficult for those with critical thinking skills to find unbiased sources. Use websites like AllSides , which rates major sites on their leanings.

Read Beyond Clickbait Headlines

Websites create headlines to generate traffic and ad revenue, not to support critical thinking or give accurate information. Too many people go by what the headline says without reading more deeply, even though media misrepresentation of studies is rampant.

Often, the information contained within the article is not accurately represented in the headline. Sometimes there’s even a direct contradiction, or the publication is focusing on one single study that may mean nothing because other studies have contradictory results.

Fact-Check Information

Use Snopes , Fact Check , and other fact-checking websites that examines viral memes and news stories for truthfulness. Ironically, Snopes itself has been the victim of misinformation campaigns designed to discredit its efforts to promote the importance of critical thinking.

Why is Critical Thinking so Important?

Misinformation, if not addressed, easily turns into disinformation when it’s readily shared by students, individuals and groups that may know it’s wrong. They may continue to intentionally spread it to cast doubt or stir divisiveness. Students listen to their peers, and the more critical thinking is addressed in a course, the more we prepare students not to fall into the misinformation trap.

Courtney Brown and Sherrish Holland , of the Center for the Professional Education of Teachers, argue that for educators, the challenge is now far more about how they need to inform their students to interpret and assess the information they come across and not simply how to gain access to it. The term “fake news” is used to discredit anyone trying to clarify fact from fiction. Fake news is a cover for some people when they are being deliberately deceptive.

As educators become clearer about the distinction, it can be better communicated to students.

Teaching Students to Think Critically

Anyone in a teaching position should point their students toward reliable references. For example, at SNHU, instructors can send students to databases in the Shapiro Library . For other materials, they should teach them to evaluate their integrity based on the four elements of critical thinking.

Is the premise legitimate or is it clickbait? Are the arguments in the article supported by evidence? Do the facts paint a reasonable picture, or are there contradictions? Is the article based on logic, or is it designed to draw in readers by misrepresenting its content? Is it hosted on a biased site, and do its authors have connections that could cause bias? Does it pass a fact check as a final evaluation?

Instructors can also incorporate these elements into announcements, discussion posts and feedback. For example, they can post two articles with differing viewpoints on the week’s material. For each, they can break down the publication’s possible slant, the way in which any research-based material is presented, and the author’s credentials. This demonstrates the different ways in which similar material can be presented, depending on the source and authors’ affiliations and biases.

Anyone Can Promote Critical Thinking

Even if you don’t teach, use those points in conversations to help others hone their critical thinking skills. If someone shares misinformation with you, don’t be combative. Instead, use probing statements and questions designed to spark their critical thinking.

Here are some examples:

• “That’s very interesting. Do you think the person they’re quoting might be letting his business interests color what he’s saying?”
• “I know that sometimes the media oversimplifies research. I wonder who funded that study and if that’s influencing what they’re saying.”

Of course, you need to adapt to the situation and to make what you say sound organic and conversational, but the core idea remains the same. Inspire the other person to use critical thinking skills. Give them reasons to look more deeply into the topic instead of blindly accepting information.

American cultural anthropologist Margaret Mead said, “Children must be taught how to think, not what to think.” Her sentiment is true for learners of any age, which makes it crucial for educators to maintain sharp critical thinking skills and pass them along to students to support them in their careers and in everyday life.

A degree can change your life. Choose your program  from 200+ SNHU degrees that can take you where you want to go.

Dr. Nickolas Dominello is the senior associate dean on the social sciences team at Southern New Hampshire University. He joined SNHU in 2014, served as a lead psychology faculty member, was promoted to associate dean in 2018 and then to senior associate dean in 2023. Dominello completed his doctoral training at Capella University in 2013, becoming a PhD in Psychology. He also has a Master of Arts in Education at the secondary level, and he has over 20 years of experience working as an educator.

Dr. Barbara Lesniak is the executive director of Social Sciences at Southern New Hampshire University. She started at SNHU as an adjunct in 2012, and her previous roles included associate dean of psychology and senior dean. Her experience outside of academia includes 15 years designing and delivering classroom and web-based courses in the corporate world and providing face-to-face and online counseling services. She specialized in helping online clients in acute crisis situations. Lesniak has a PsyD in Psychology and, as a lifelong learner, she earned an MFA and MS in Marketing at SNHU and is currently working on an MS in Organizational Leadership.

Dr. Tom MacCarty is an associate dean on the social sciences team and oversees the MS in Psychology program at Southern New Hampshire University. He received his PhD in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from Northcentral University. He also holds a Certificate of Advanced Graduate Studies in School Psychology and a Master of Arts Degree in Counseling Psychology from Norwich University. MacCarty can be found on LinkedIn .

Explore more content like this article

What is the Difference Between Bachelor’s and Master’s Degrees?

Academic Referencing: How to Cite a Research Paper

What is Considered Plagiarism And How to Avoid It

About southern new hampshire university.

SNHU is a nonprofit, accredited university with a mission to make high-quality education more accessible and affordable for everyone.

Founded in 1932, and online since 1995, we’ve helped countless students reach their goals with flexible, career-focused programs . Our 300-acre campus in Manchester, NH is home to over 3,000 students, and we serve over 135,000 students online. Visit our about SNHU  page to learn more about our mission, accreditations, leadership team, national recognitions and awards.

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Working with sources
• What Is Critical Thinking? | Definition & Examples

What Is Critical Thinking? | Definition & Examples

Published on May 30, 2022 by Eoghan Ryan . Revised on May 31, 2023.

Critical thinking is the ability to effectively analyze information and form a judgment .

To think critically, you must be aware of your own biases and assumptions when encountering information, and apply consistent standards when evaluating sources .

Critical thinking skills help you to:

• Identify credible sources
• Evaluate and respond to arguments
• Assess alternative viewpoints
• Test hypotheses against relevant criteria

Table of contents

Why is critical thinking important, critical thinking examples, how to think critically, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about critical thinking.

Critical thinking is important for making judgments about sources of information and forming your own arguments. It emphasizes a rational, objective, and self-aware approach that can help you to identify credible sources and strengthen your conclusions.

Critical thinking is important in all disciplines and throughout all stages of the research process . The types of evidence used in the sciences and in the humanities may differ, but critical thinking skills are relevant to both.

In academic writing , critical thinking can help you to determine whether a source:

• Is free from research bias
• Provides evidence to support its research findings
• Considers alternative viewpoints

Outside of academia, critical thinking goes hand in hand with information literacy to help you form opinions rationally and engage independently and critically with popular media.

Don't submit your assignments before you do this

The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students. Free citation check included.

Try for free

Critical thinking can help you to identify reliable sources of information that you can cite in your research paper . It can also guide your own research methods and inform your own arguments.

Outside of academia, critical thinking can help you to be aware of both your own and others’ biases and assumptions.

Academic examples

However, when you compare the findings of the study with other current research, you determine that the results seem improbable. You analyze the paper again, consulting the sources it cites.

You notice that the research was funded by the pharmaceutical company that created the treatment. Because of this, you view its results skeptically and determine that more independent research is necessary to confirm or refute them. Example: Poor critical thinking in an academic context You’re researching a paper on the impact wireless technology has had on developing countries that previously did not have large-scale communications infrastructure. You read an article that seems to confirm your hypothesis: the impact is mainly positive. Rather than evaluating the research methodology, you accept the findings uncritically.

Nonacademic examples

However, you decide to compare this review article with consumer reviews on a different site. You find that these reviews are not as positive. Some customers have had problems installing the alarm, and some have noted that it activates for no apparent reason.

You revisit the original review article. You notice that the words “sponsored content” appear in small print under the article title. Based on this, you conclude that the review is advertising and is therefore not an unbiased source. Example: Poor critical thinking in a nonacademic context You support a candidate in an upcoming election. You visit an online news site affiliated with their political party and read an article that criticizes their opponent. The article claims that the opponent is inexperienced in politics. You accept this without evidence, because it fits your preconceptions about the opponent.

There is no single way to think critically. How you engage with information will depend on the type of source you’re using and the information you need.

However, you can engage with sources in a systematic and critical way by asking certain questions when you encounter information. Like the CRAAP test , these questions focus on the currency , relevance , authority , accuracy , and purpose of a source of information.

When encountering information, ask:

• Who is the author? Are they an expert in their field?
• What do they say? Is their argument clear? Can you summarize it?
• When did they say this? Is the source current?
• Where is the information published? Is it an academic article? Is it peer-reviewed ?
• Why did the author publish it? What is their motivation?
• How do they make their argument? Is it backed up by evidence? Does it rely on opinion, speculation, or appeals to emotion ? Do they address alternative arguments?

Critical thinking also involves being aware of your own biases, not only those of others. When you make an argument or draw your own conclusions, you can ask similar questions about your own writing:

• Am I only considering evidence that supports my preconceptions?
• Is my argument expressed clearly and backed up with credible sources?
• Would I be convinced by this argument coming from someone else?

If you want to know more about ChatGPT, AI tools , citation , and plagiarism , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• ChatGPT vs human editor
• ChatGPT citations
• Is ChatGPT trustworthy?
• Using ChatGPT for your studies
• What is ChatGPT?
• Chicago style
• Paraphrasing

 Plagiarism

• Types of plagiarism
• Self-plagiarism
• Avoiding plagiarism
• Academic integrity
• Consequences of plagiarism
• Common knowledge

Critical thinking refers to the ability to evaluate information and to be aware of biases or assumptions, including your own.

Like information literacy , it involves evaluating arguments, identifying and solving problems in an objective and systematic way, and clearly communicating your ideas.

Critical thinking skills include the ability to:

You can assess information and arguments critically by asking certain questions about the source. You can use the CRAAP test , focusing on the currency , relevance , authority , accuracy , and purpose of a source of information.

Ask questions such as:

• Who is the author? Are they an expert?
• How do they make their argument? Is it backed up by evidence?

A credible source should pass the CRAAP test  and follow these guidelines:

• The information should be up to date and current.
• The author and publication should be a trusted authority on the subject you are researching.
• The sources the author cited should be easy to find, clear, and unbiased.
• For a web source, the URL and layout should signify that it is trustworthy.

Information literacy refers to a broad range of skills, including the ability to find, evaluate, and use sources of information effectively.

Being information literate means that you:

• Know how to find credible sources
• Use relevant sources to inform your research
• Understand what constitutes plagiarism
• Know how to cite your sources correctly

Confirmation bias is the tendency to search, interpret, and recall information in a way that aligns with our pre-existing values, opinions, or beliefs. It refers to the ability to recollect information best when it amplifies what we already believe. Relatedly, we tend to forget information that contradicts our opinions.

Although selective recall is a component of confirmation bias, it should not be confused with recall bias.

On the other hand, recall bias refers to the differences in the ability between study participants to recall past events when self-reporting is used. This difference in accuracy or completeness of recollection is not related to beliefs or opinions. Rather, recall bias relates to other factors, such as the length of the recall period, age, and the characteristics of the disease under investigation.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Ryan, E. (2023, May 31). What Is Critical Thinking? | Definition & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved September 3, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/working-with-sources/critical-thinking/

Is this article helpful?

Eoghan Ryan

Other students also liked, student guide: information literacy | meaning & examples, what are credible sources & how to spot them | examples, applying the craap test & evaluating sources, get unlimited documents corrected.

✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts