The marketplace for case solutions.

Time Value of Money: The Buy Versus Rent Decision – Case Solution

In this "Time Value of Money: The Buy Versus Rent Decision" case study, a recent MBA graduate had been renting an apartment while a similar flat had been listed for sale. The graduate is now facing the typical buy versus rent decision. Hence the grad decided to apply some of her analytical tools acquired in business school to make this decision for her personal life.

​Sean Cleary, Stephen R. Foerster Ivey ( W14403-PDF-ENG ) August 28, 2014

Case questions answered:

Case study questions answered in the first solution:

  • What is the best solution to take — to rent or to buy?
  • What are the assumptions you use?

Case study questions answered in the second solution:

  • Calculate the best route for the graduate’s housing situation, developing your understanding of the time value of money (TVM) concepts and calculations.
  • Describe your assumptions, methodology, and results in your discussion narrative, and attach a simple spreadsheet supporting your analysis.

Not the questions you were looking for? Submit your own questions & get answers .

Time Value of Money: The Buy Versus Rent Decision Case Answers

Excel calculations

This case solution includes an Excel file with calculations.

You will receive access to two case study solutions! The second is not yet visible in the preview.

BACKGROUND – Time Value of Money: The Buy Versus Rent Decision Case Study

The case is about Rebecca Young, who just completed her MBA and moved to Toronto for her new job in the banking industry. She is having a dilemma between renting or buying a condo instead.

A condo unit is an identical unit next door to her rented unit. She has been renting for more than a year, and she really thinks she can afford the monthly amortization, knowing that she has a secured job in the next 5-10 years.

Let us list the facts of the case:

Her monthly rent is $3,000, and this does not include utilities and cable television, but parking is included in the monthly rent.

The purchase price of the unit is $620,000, but Rebecca thinks she can get it for $600,000. 20% of the purchase price is needed for a downpayment. This will also include both a local and provincial deed-transfer tax of 1.5% of the purchase price – this is both payable and due on the purchase date. A closing fee is estimated to be around $2,000. The total cash outlay on the purchase date totals $140,000, broken as follows:

Time Value of Money: The Buy Versus Rent Decision

Rebecca requested to model the amount of the outstanding principal at various points in the future, two, five, and ten years from now, and this was presented to her.

There were also scenario cases that she considered in her analysis before making her final decision. These scenario cases are presented below and are described accordingly:

  • The condo price remains unchanged.
  • The condo price drops 10% over the next two years, then increases back to its purchase price by the end of five years, and then increases by a total of 10% from the original price by the end of ten years.
  • The condo price increases annually by the annual rate of inflation of 2% per year over the next ten years
  • The condo price increases annually by an annual rate of 5% per year over the next 1ten years.

These scenario cases are properly illustrated and calculated using the Excel platform.

PRESENTATION:

Case 1 is presented to Ms. Young as saying that she is renting the condo and intelligently pursuing to invest the cash outlay of $140,000. The future value of this investment at year 2 is…

Unlock Case Solution Now!

Get instant access to this case solution with a simple, one-time payment ($24.90).

After purchase:

  • You'll be redirected to the full case solution.
  • You will receive an access link to the solution via email.
Best decision to get my homework done faster! Michael MBA student, Boston

How do I get access?

Upon purchase, you are forwarded to the full solution and also receive access via email.

Is it safe to pay?

Yes! We use Paypal and Stripe as our secure payment providers of choice.

What is Casehero?

We are the marketplace for case solutions - created by students, for students.

  • High School
  • You don't have any recent items yet.
  • You don't have any courses yet.
  • You don't have any books yet.
  • You don't have any Studylists yet.
  • Information

Case study on TVM

Financial management (finman), la salle university.

Student

Students also viewed

  • Guía del estudiante PNA Matemática General Universitaria
  • Complete PET TEST Full Test
  • STS - Lecture notes 1
  • Falcao & Fontes. En quién se pone el Foco
  • PART 4 User-Interface Tech Command Line Interface
  • Intro to social work

Related documents

  • Saints Among Us Reflection #6
  • NUR 203 Final Test Map 2021
  • Personal computing (CSC)
  • Fallas debidas a cargas estaticas clase 2 sem II 2021
  • Terminologia MÉdica

Preview text

International Journal of Research in Finance and Management 2018; 1(1): 18 -

P P-ISSN: 2617- E-ISSN: 2617 - IJRFM 201 8; 1(1): 18 - Received: 10-11-

Accepted: 12-12-201 7

Mohammad Rahman Institute of Business Administration, Jahangirnagar University, Bangladesh

Correspondence Mohammad Rahman Institute of Business Administration, Jahangirnagar University, Bangladesh

Time value of money: A case study on its concept and

Its application in real life problems, mohammad rahman.

Purpose of this case study is to understand the concept of time value of money. Way to calculate future value and to use it real life situations. It is the concept that the value of a rupee to be received in coming future is less than the value of rupee today. Time value of Money is a theory advantage of having money today then latter. The time value of money is a concept, which states money available now has worth more than the same amount of money in future due to its earning capacity. I have studied advantages / significance of TVM and various reasons which lead to requirement of TVM. Major reason behind time value of money is inflation, risk and rate of return; which lead to reduction in value of same money in future period. I have tried to find solution to four real life problems through this case study. Problem includes loan repayment problem, investment problem, asset replacement problem, growth rate of profit earned in various years and implicit return on investment.

Keywords: Time value of money (TVM), present value future value rate of return, number of periods, annuity value

Introduction It is the concept that the value of a rupee to be received in coming future is less than the value of rupee today. I. Time value of Money is a theory advantage of having money today then latter. II. The time value of money is a concept, which states money available now has worth more than the same amount of money in future due to its earning capacity.

  • To understand the concept of Time value of money
  • How we can calculate present value/ future value for profiled cash flows?
  • How time of money can helps us to solve our real life problems?

There are various reasons behind this concept

  • Investment: Money can be invested for generating more money, so money received today has greater value.
  • Interest Earning: Value of rupee currently is more than its future value, as it is expected that it can be A rupee today is worth more today than in future because of its opportunity cost of lost earnings.
  • Inflation: It is expected to increase in price of commodities in coming future due to inflation, which lead to decline in value of today’s money. “Positive rate of Inflation reduce the purchasing power of rupee with passage of time”.
  • Risk: When someone lends money, there is a risk involved in not paying back the money. Because of that risk interest is charged on the money, which reduces value of money.

Terms attached with Time Value of Money are

Present Value is a series of future payment or future value discounted at a rate of interest up to the current date to reflect the time value of money and result is called present value.

Future Value is amount that is calculated by increasing present value or series of payment at the given rate of interest and result is future value.

Rate of Interest is a charge against use to inflate/discount present value / future value to achieve desire result.

Time Value of Money Principle: It is used to compare two different cash flow statements of two different companies or projects for investment. Purpose is to state return provided by them if we make investment now.

Number of Periods: it represent the time period to which value or payment series discounted / inflated to calculate appropriate return.

Significance of Time Value of Money It is mostly used concept in Finance world; based on this, decisions are made to maximize return on investments. It helps shareholders to invest their fund wisely. Its concept contributes to this aspect to much extent. Its significance are as follows:

  • Investment Decision is decision to make investment of funds for long term purpose. TVM help us to identify long term cash flow statements which will occur at different point of time. So, if investor have two projects to invest its money in, those two projects can be compared with this technique even if their cash flow statement time period doesn’t matches with each other by providing present value of their future cash flow. Its concept is mostly used in equity or debt securities investment by using valuation models while doing investments.
  • Financing Decision is decision to make to optimize capital structure of the organization. Raising fund for equity, debt or from any other source. TVM helps in this decision by comparing cost to company through usage of effective rate of interest of each source of finance. And then present value of costs of two alternatives is compared against each other to decide on appropriate source of financing.
  • Operational Decision: This concept is also used in evaluating creditor cycle and debtors’ cycle in managing cash collection under current assets management.

Tvm Formula FV = PV * [1 + (i/n)] (n * t) FV = Future value of money PV = Present value of money i = Interest rate t = number of years taken into consideration n = number of compounding periods of interest per year

Example: PV = Rs. 10, i = 10% t = 10 years n = 1 p. FV =?

Scenario 1: n changes from 1 to 4 in case 1 Scenario 2: i changes from 10% to 11% in case 1 Scenario 3: t changes from 1 to 4 in case 1

Let see 3 different scenarios; with change in single input how it leads to change in results:

In all three scenarios with increase in any of these inputs leads to increase in future value in all the scenarios and vice versa.

Applications of Time Value of Money in Real Life Problems Asset Replacement Problem A Manager has to find out accumulated sum of money in future date to replace it with existing assets. Example: ABC Ltd has Rs. 100,000 of Debentures (5%). Company want set up a replacement of existing assets after 10 years. This replacement asset earns 8% per year. Required investment will be as follows: Outcome: So ABC Ltd should invest Rs. 46,319 now to get Rs. 100,000 as replacement at 10 years.

i = 8% t = 10 n = 1 FV = 100, PV = Rs. 100,000 / [1 + (0/1)] ^ (1 * 10) PV = Rs. 46,319.

Investment Problem (Rate of Return) Manage wants to calculate implicit rate of return over an investment. Example: Company offering to pay Rs. 201,475 at the end of 10 years with deposit of Rs. 15,000 p. How much implicate rate of return ABC ltd is offering to its customers? Outcome: Company is offering 5% of annual return.

  • Anderson CM. Motivation - The essential in budgeting. N.A. Bulletin 1963 , 46.
  • Anderson CM. The capital budgeting process. Management Accounting (September). 1972; 30 -32:42.
  • Anderson DR. Justifying plant investments. N.A.C Bulletin. 1934 , 1036-1048.
  • Anderson HR, RP Schwartz. The capital facility decision. Management Accounting. 1971 , 28-32.
  • Anderson LP, VV Miller. Capital budgeting: A modified approach to capital allocation. Management Accounting, 1969 , 28-32.
  • Ang NP, KT Trotman. The utilization of quantitative and qualitative information in groups' capital investment decisions. Behavioral Research In Accounting. 2015; 27(1):1-24.
  • Ansari S. The Capital Budgeting Process. McGraw- Hill/Irwin, 2000.
  • Anthony RN. Equity interest - Its time has come. Journal of Accountancy, 1982 , 76-93.
  • Arya A, J Glover. Option value to waiting created by a control problem. Journal of Accounting Research, 2001 , 405-415. (JSTOR link).
  • Baker JC. Capital budgeting in American and European companies. Mid Atlantic Journal of Business (Summer), 1984 , 15-28.
  • Balachandran KR, RA Maschmeyer, JL Livingstone. Product warranty period: A Markovian approach to estimation and analysis of repair and replacement costs. The Accounting Review, 1981 , 115-124. (JSTOR link).
  • Balakrishnan R. The role of budgets and variances in repeated investment decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research. 1990 7(1): 105 -122.
  • Balakrishnan R. The value of communication in resource allocation decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research. 1992; 8(2):353-373.
  • Baldenius T, S Dutta, S Reichelstein. Cost allocation for capital budgeting decisions. The Accounting Review (July): 837-867. (JSTOR link), 2007.
  • Barenbaum L, T Monahan. Utilizing terminal values in teaching time value analysis. Journal of Accounting Education. 1983; 1(2):79-88.
  • Barisa LA. A pattern for profitable automotive fleet transportation. N.A. Bulletin (February): 56-64. (Purchase, lease, or reimburse employees who own them), 1965.
  • Bartley JW. A NPV model modified for inflation. Management Accounting (December), 1980, 49-52.
  • Barton D, M Wiseman. Focusing capital on the long term. Harvard Business Review 2014 , 44-51.
  • Bisgay L. NAA publishes new MAP statement. Management Accounting, 1984, 67 -68.
  • Bishop AN, Practical budgeting of capital expenditures. N.A.C. Bulletin 1956 , 534-544.
  • Cannaday RE, PF Colwell, H Paley. Relevant and irrelevant internal rates of return. Engineering Economist (Fall), 1986, 17-38.
  • Carr C, K Kolehmainen, F Mitchell. Strategic investment decision making practices: A contextual

approach. Management Accounting Research (September), 2010, 167-184. 30. Carroll JJ, GD Newbould. NPV vs. IRR: With capital budgeting, which do you choose? Healthcare Financial Management (November), 1986; 66 (68):62-64. 31. Carson AB. An investment-recovery-first concept of taxable profit. The Accounting Review, 1951 , 456-467. (JSTOR link). 32. Casler GL, BL Anderson, RD Aplin. Capital Investment Analysis: Using Discounted Cash Flows. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley, 1984 , 33. Caughron RE. How we follow up capital expenditures. N.A. Bulletin, 1965, 47-52. 34. Chalos P, MCC Poon. Participation and performance in capital budgeting teams. Behavioral Research In Accounting. 2000; (12):199-230. 35. Chambers JC, SK Mullick. Investment decision-making in a multinational enterprise. Management Accounting, 1971 , 13-20. 36. Champion RR, RG Glaser. Sugar cane irrigation: A case study in capital budgeting. Management Science (August): B781-B796. (JSTOR link), 1967. 37. Chang EC. Risk and inflation. Journal of Financial And Quantitative Analysis, 1987 , 89-99. 38. Dargenidou C, S McLeay, I Raonic. Expected earnings growth and the cost of capital: An analysis of accounting regime change in the European financial market. Abacus. 2006; 42(3-4):388-414. 39. Davidson I, Y Shinozawa, M Tippett. Capital project analysis when cash flows evolve as a continuous time branching process. Abacus. 2009; 45(1):44-65. 40. Day JE. A screening model for investment proposals. Management Accounting (January):. (Indexed discounted payback), 1975, 48- 41. Dayananda D, R Irons, S Harrison, J Herbohn, P Rowland. Capital Budgeting: Financial Appraisal of Investment Projects. Cambridge University Press, 2002. 42. Deakin EB. A class project for risk analysis in capital budgeting. The Accounting Review (January): 146-149. (JSTOR link), 1974. 43. Dean J. Capital Budgeting. New York: Columbia University Press, 1951. 44. Dean J. Measurement of profits for executive decisions. The Accounting Review (April): 185-196. (JSTOR link), 1951. 45. Dean J. Measuring the productivity of capital. Harvard Business Review (January-February), 1954, 120-130. 46. Deekens AVK. Did we realize on that capital outlay? N.A. Bulletin, 1959, 86-88. 47. Del Rio CA, MW Ray. Economics for expanding operations. N.A. Bulletin, 1965, 38 -44. 48. De Moville W. Capital budgeting in municipalities. Management Accounting, 1977, 17 -20. 49. Dempsey SJ. On the benefits of a mathematical solutions approach to time value of money instruction: Arguments and evidence. Journal of Accounting Education, 2003; 21(3):239-260. 50. Denison CA. Real options and escalation of commitment: A behavioral analysis of capital investment decisions. The Accounting Review, 2009 , 133 -155. 51. Denison CA, AM Farrell, KE Jackson. Managers’

incorporation of the value of real options into their long-term investment decisions: An experimental investigation. Contemporary Accounting Research. 2012 ; 29(2):590-620. 52. Esposito EF. The cost of capital for middle-market companies: Using middle-market finance theory and Pepperdine Private Capital Markets Project. The CPA Journal, 2013 , 53-56. 53. Ettredge M, Y Huang, W Zhang. Earnings restatements and differential timeliness of accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2012 , 489-503. 54. Ezzamel MA. Estimating the cost of capital for a division of a firm and the allocation problem in accounting: A comment. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 1980; 7(1):65-73. 55. Ezzell JR, WA Kelley. APV analysis of capital budgeting under inflation. Financial Management (Autumn), 1984, 49-54. 56. Fairchild KM D Bline. Capital investment analysis: The index method. Issues in Accounting Education (Spring), 1988 , 72-78. 57. Farragher EJ. Capital budgeting practices of Non- industrial firms. Engineering Economist (Summer), 1986 , 293-302. 58. Felix WL. Estimating the relationship between technical change and reported performance. The Accounting Review, 1972 , 52-63. (JSTOR link). 59. Fellers CI. Problems of capital expenditure budgeting. NACA. Bulletin, 1955 , 1208-1217. 60. Fellingham JC, RA Young. Special allocations, investment decisions, and transactions costs in partnerships. Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn), 1989 , 179-200. (JSTOR link). 61. Fera N. Using shareholder value to evaluate strategic choices. Management Accounting (November): 47-51. (Summary), 1997. 62. Ferrara WL. Should investment and financing decisions be separated? The Accounting Review, 1966 , 106-114. (JSTOR link). 63. Ferrara WL. Capital budgeting and financing or leasing decisions. Management Accounting, 1968 , 55-63. 64. Ferreira N, J Kar, L Trigeorgis. Option games. Harvard Business Review (March): 101-107. (Option games is a valuation tool combining real options with game theory to help managers make rational investment decisions), 2009. 65. Finerty JJ. Product pricing and investment analysis. Management Accounting (December), 1971, 15-18. 66. Finn FJ. Integer programming, linear programming and capital budgeting. Abacus. 1973; 9(2):180-192. 67. Gaver DP. Models for appraising investments yielding stochastic returns. Management Science. 1965 , 815- 830. (JSTOR link). 68. Gebhardt WR, CMC Lee, B Swaminathan. Toward an implied cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 2001 , 135-176. (JSTOR link). 69. Geiler LE. Analysis of uncertainty in capital expenditures. Management Accounting, 1970 , 32-36. 70. Ghosh D. Throwing good money after bad. Management Accounting, (How to avoid the escalation phenomenon or pouring money into losing projects), 1995 , 51-54.

  • Gigler F. Discussion of centralization, delegation, and shared responsibility in the assignment of capital investment decision rights. Journal of Accounting Research (Studies on Managerial Accounting), 1995, 165 -175. (JSTOR link).
  • Gillett JB. A funded reserve for major removals. Management Accounting, 1978, 30 -34.
  • Gilroy WM. Investment control in fixed price defense contracting. Management Accounting, 1967 , 38-42.
  • Glahn GL, KT Fields, JE Trapnell. How to evaluate mixed risks capital projects. Management Accounting, 1980 ; 43:34- 38.
  • Glahn GL, KT Fields, JE Trapnell. Capital budgeting for mixed risk projects. Managerial Planning. 1984 ; 21- 27 :31.
  • Glover J. Discussion of: “Controlling investment decisions: Depreciation and capital charges”. Review of Accounting Studies. 2002; 7(2-3): 283 -287.
  • Gode D, P Mohanram. Inferring the cost of capital using the Ohlson-Juettner model. Review of Accounting Studies. 2003; 8(4):399-431.
  • Goetz BE. A problem in discounted cash flow. The Accounting Review, 1971 , 162-164. (JSTOR link).
  • Gold B. The shaky foundations of capital budgeting. California Management Review (Winter) (Summary), 1976 , 51-60.
  • Golden CW, MR Golden. Beyond 'what if': A risk- oriented capital budgeting model. Journal of Information Systems (Spring), 1987, 53-64.
  • Goodnight IO. Making replacement decisions to reduce costs. NACA. Bulletin, 1955 , 1643-1653.
  • Gordon LA. The return on investment and the cost of capital. Management Accounting, 1976 , 37-40.
  • Gordon LA, MD Myers. Postauditing capital projects. Management Accounting, 1991, 39 -42.
  • Hawawini G, C Viallet. Finance for Executives: Managing for Value Creation, 2e. South-Western Educational Publishing, 2002.
  • Hayes RM, R Lundholm. Segment reporting to the capital market in the presence of a competitor. Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn): 261-279. (JSTOR link), 1996.
  • Hinton TL. Capital investment: International Paper fights back. Management Accounting, 1983 , 41-44.
  • Hirst MK, JA Baxter. A capital budgeting case study: An analysis of a choice process and roles of information. Behavioral Research In Accounting, 1993; (5):187-210.
  • Hou K, MA van Dijk, Y Zhang. The implied cost of capital: A new approach. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2012 , 504-526.
  • Houck RG. Budgetary review of plant additions in a public utility. NACA. Bulletin, 1948, 251-256.
  • House WC Jr. The usefulness of sensitivity analysis in
  • Multiple Choice

Course : Financial Management (FinMan)

University : la salle university.

case study time value of money

  • More from: Financial Management FinMan La Salle University 3   Documents Go to course