what is the best biography of napoleon bonaparte

• NONFICTION BOOKS
• BEST NONFICTION 2023
• BEST NONFICTION 2024
• Historical Biographies
• The Best Memoirs and Autobiographies
• Philosophical Biographies
• World War 2
• World History
• American History
• British History
• Chinese History
• Russian History
• Ancient History (up to 500)
• Medieval History (500-1400)
• Military History
• Art History
• Travel Books
• Ancient Philosophy
• Contemporary Philosophy
• Ethics & Moral Philosophy
• Great Philosophers
• Social & Political Philosophy
• Classical Studies
• New Science Books
• Maths & Statistics
• Popular Science
• Physics Books
• Climate Change Books
• How to Write
• English Grammar & Usage
• Books for Learning Languages
• Linguistics
• Political Ideologies
• Foreign Policy & International Relations
• American Politics
• British Politics
• Religious History Books
• Mental Health
• Neuroscience
• Child Psychology
• Film & Cinema
• Opera & Classical Music
• Behavioural Economics
• Development Economics
• Economic History
• Financial Crisis
• World Economies
• How to Invest
• Artificial Intelligence/AI Books
• Data Science Books
• Sex & Sexuality
• Death & Dying
• Food & Cooking
• Sports, Games & Hobbies
• FICTION BOOKS
• BEST NOVELS 2024
• BEST FICTION 2023
• New Literary Fiction
• World Literature
• Literary Criticism
• Literary Figures
• Classic English Literature
• American Literature
• Comics & Graphic Novels
• Fairy Tales & Mythology
• Historical Fiction
• Crime Novels
• Science Fiction
• Short Stories
• South Africa
• United States
• Arctic & Antarctica
• Afghanistan
• Myanmar (Formerly Burma)
• Netherlands
• Kids Recommend Books for Kids
• High School Teachers Recommendations
• Prizewinning Kids' Books
• Popular Series Books for Kids
• BEST BOOKS FOR KIDS (ALL AGES)
• Ages Baby-2
• Books for Teens and Young Adults
• THE BEST SCIENCE BOOKS FOR KIDS
• BEST KIDS' BOOKS OF 2023
• BEST BOOKS FOR TEENS OF 2023
• Best Audiobooks for Kids
• Environment
• Best Books for Teens of 2023
• Best Kids' Books of 2023
• Political Novels
• New History Books
• New Historical Fiction
• New Biography
• New Memoirs
• New World Literature
• New Economics Books
• New Climate Books
• New Math Books
• New Philosophy Books
• New Psychology Books
• New Physics Books
• THE BEST AUDIOBOOKS
• Actors Read Great Books
• Books Narrated by Their Authors
• Best Audiobook Thrillers
• Best History Audiobooks
• Nobel Literature Prize
• Booker Prize (fiction)
• Baillie Gifford Prize (nonfiction)
• Financial Times (nonfiction)
• Wolfson Prize (history)
• Royal Society (science)
• Pushkin House Prize (Russia)
• Walter Scott Prize (historical fiction)
• Arthur C Clarke Prize (sci fi)
• The Hugos (sci fi & fantasy)
• Audie Awards (audiobooks)

Make Your Own List

History Books » Historical Figures

The best books on napoleon, recommended by andrew roberts.

Napoleon: A Life by Andrew Roberts

How did Napoleon Bonaparte, an upstart Corsican, go on to conquer half of Europe in the 16 years of his rule? Was he a military genius? And was he really that short? Historian Andrew Roberts , author of a bestselling biography of Napoleon , introduces us to the books that shaped how he sees l'Empereur —including little-known sources from those who knew Napoleon personally. Read more history book recommendations on Five Books

Interview by Charles J. Styles

The Campaigns of Napoleon by David G Chandler

Talleyrand by Duff Cooper

With Eagles to Glory: Napoleon and His German Allies in the 1809 Campaign by John H Gill

Private Memoirs Of The Court Of Napoleon by Louis François Joseph Bausset-Roquefort

With Napoleon in Russia: Memoirs of General de Caulaincourt, Duke of Vicenza by Armand de Caulaincourt

1 The Campaigns of Napoleon by David G Chandler

2 talleyrand by duff cooper, 3 with eagles to glory: napoleon and his german allies in the 1809 campaign by john h gill, 4 private memoirs of the court of napoleon by louis françois joseph bausset-roquefort, 5 with napoleon in russia: memoirs of general de caulaincourt, duke of vicenza by armand de caulaincourt.

I f you were to explain the significance of Napoleon Bonaparte (1769–1821) to someone who knew nothing about him, what would you say?

I argue that although he didn’t have much to do with the French Revolution itself, as he was too young, he nonetheless kept the best bits of the Revolution—equality before the law, religious tolerance, meritocracy—for France and the countries that France conquered. The Code Napoleon was still in effect in the Rhineland until 1900, for example, and it underlies modern European legal systems to this day.

He got rid of the worst bits, like the mass guillotining, the Reign of Terror, the various mad ideas they had like the ten-day week, abolishing Christianity, and so on. He was the person who brought France into the 19th century with huge reforms of administration and finance. He was a moderniser.

You mentioned his relationship with the Revolution. I think there’s something paradoxical about it. He’d declare things like “I am the Revolution”, and the Napoleonic Code did enshrine revolutionary principles like civic equality into law. But didn’t he also curtail the rights of women and reinstate slavery in the Caribbean sugar colonies? Some would argue that the main constitution itself was structurally undemocratic, with an unelected senate, even if it was put to the people in a plebiscite.

The Code Napoleon was not good for women , but then they were hardly over-endowed with rights before the Revolution. He went on to abolish slavery , of course, not once but twice. He did reinstitute it in 1802, but abolished it again in 1814. So, he had an in-out/in-out policy with slavery. When I say a ‘moderniser’, I mean a moderniser in the context of the times, not a moderniser in the context of Tony Blair.

Joining the dots between the French Revolution and Napoleon’s ascendency, how did France go from establishing a Republic and executing their king to welcoming an emperor barely a decade later?

I think his military successes first in Italy in 1796 and also in 1800 as well as his creation of the civil code were essential to understanding how they able to recognise that he wasn’t a king . Being an emperor and being a king were very different things. They were perfectly happy to have an empire, which they saw as being based on republican principles, with a Napoleon rather than Bourbon at the top of the tree.

So, there wasn’t any lingering republican resistance?

No, there was—especially in the army. The French army was considered to be highly republican. There was resistance from people like Marshal Bernadotte to Napoleon calling himself an emperor in December 1804. But it was not unpopular in the rest of the country.

I really enjoyed your own biography of Napoleon , which was awarded the Grand Prix of the Fondation Napoléon. It’s an excellent read and continues to be an international bestseller in both UK and US editions. It was also one of the first books to build upon the publication of some 33,000 of Napoleon’s letters. I’m curious to know what you found to be the most striking revelations from them. Did they overturn any major myths?

There are still dozens of myths and misconceptions about Napoleon. But what I came across most powerfully among the letters was his capacity for compartmentalising his mind. He could completely ignore what was happening at the time, even during or after battles or when the Kremlin was burning, and concentrate on running parts of his empire, or on setting up the rules of a girls’ school, or on telling a prefect that he shouldn’t be seen at the opera with his mistress. He had this incredible capacity for, as he put it, pulling out a drawer in his mind, dealing with whatever was in it, and then closing it again.

If we’re talking about myths, I suppose the main one to get out of the way is his height!

Your first book choice is The Campaigns of Napoleon by David Chandler. Can you tell us about this one and why you’ve recommended it?

It’s a totally comprehensive history of all of Napoleon’s campaigns. Chandler wrote it, I think, in the late 60s, and yet it still holds up very well as an overall history of Napoleon’s fighting. Perfectly understandably, it doesn’t include everything else about Napoleon—the politics, the personality, the 27 mistresses and all the rest of it—nor is it intending to do that. It’s just doing the military side of it all. But it is an absolutely encyclopaedic run-through of all of Napoleon’s battles.

So, this is a must-have for military history buffs?

It is indeed. David Chandler reissued it several times and updated it with the latest thought on Napoleon’s battles. If there was something new said on the Battle of Austerlitz or something like that, he would then reissue the book with that new information in it. So, you want to buy the last iteration of it before David died.

Napoleon is often labelled a “military genius”. Notwithstanding his ultimate defeat, what is the best way to support that judgement?

I think the fact that he was able to fight so many different kinds of battles. The reason that he’s a genius is that he managed to win battles whether he outnumbered the enemy or was outnumbered by the enemy, whether he was moving forwards or backwards, whether or not he was having his right or left flank enveloped, or whether he was enveloping the enemies. Or sometimes he could do a double-envelopment, which is one of the most difficult manoeuvres in warfare. He managed to pull that off.

“It is an absolutely encyclopaedic run through of all of Napoleon’s battles”

Napoleon had equal dexterity when it came to commanding infantry, cavalry, and artillery, even though he was himself educated as an artilleryman. He’s also extremely good in coalition warfare—in striking at the hinge between his enemies but also keeping his own coalitions in order. His invasion of Russia involved something like 20 countries. You have, therefore, a commander who is incredibly dextrous and capable of adapting to whatever military circumstance he’s facing.

In terms of his military weaknesses, we undoubtedly have naval warfare, but he also had difficulty with guerrilla insurgencies in the Peninsular War.

That’s right and, of course, the guerrilla insurgencies in the Russian campaign as well. He was no good at sea. At all. He just didn’t understand how ships worked. That was a huge lacuna in his capacity and his knowledge. As is what we now call “asymmetrical warfare”, where the enemy doesn’t actually put up an army in the field.

Would you say Napoleon was deluded about his own naval capabilities?

Yes. He didn’t recognise that he was rubbish at sea at all. He thought that you could tell an admiral to do things at sea in much the same way that you could tell a general to do things on land. But, of course, the whole process is very very different—not least because of the wind!

There were various points in your book where Napoleon is still trying to fund naval expansion and is putting men out in ships for warfare despite them never having been at sea before.

That’s right. To give him his due, though, he was up against the Royal Navy which was at the peak of its efficiency. Britain was putting one third of its national spend into the navy. With admirals like the Earl of St Vincent and Collingwood and obviously Nelson, they had endless extremely talented admirals and an extremely can-do attitude towards maritime fighting in the period of fighting sail. Napoleon was really up against an absolutely superb organisation in the Royal Navy. One has to give him his due, but there are no Napoleonic naval victories.

The Napoleonic Wars are very complex and involve coalitions taking on Napoleon at different points. How much can we say with generality about what provoked them?

Here was somebody who was a profoundly radical force that each of these legitimist monarchies like the Hapsburgs of Austria and the Romanovs of Russia and the Hohenzollerns of Prussia were extremely nervous about. They saw what had happened to the Bourbons in France, and they didn’t want it to happen at home. So, this cold wind of modernisation that Napoleon unleashed on Europe was something that they were very keen to try to . . . whatever you do to a wind. That’s the reason.

So, he has inherited international hostility already because of the Revolution?

That’s right, yes. But also, they didn’t see him as a legitimate monarch. There were no ‘Bonapartes’ before him. His statement that he wanted to be the Rudolf of his dynasty, i.e. the founding father like Rudolf Hapsburg had been, was seen to be impossibly pretentious—not least because Rudolf came from the 13th century and they were in the 18th century.

There are two cases of Napoleon launching an offensive war. The rest of the time, people are declaring war on him. So, would you say this image of Napoleon stomping across Europe, declaring war on everybody, annexing their territory and so on, is completely wrong?

Yes, completely wrong. He started the Peninsular War and he started the 1812 Russian campaign. Other than that, each of the wars was started by the coalitions against him.

Support Five Books

Five Books interviews are expensive to produce. If you're enjoying this interview, please support us by donating a small amount .

And the cases where Napoleon does initiate a war seem largely to do with enforcing the ‘Continental System’—his attempt to weaken Britain economically by blocking trade—rather than building an empire for empire’s sake.

Precisely, yes. He didn’t believe in empire for empire’s sake; he recognised that he could overstretch French resources very dangerously and very easily. But he did want to try to force England to the negotiating table. The way he thought he could do that was to hit us in our pocket and try to cut us off from all European markets.

That’s why he invaded Portugal, which was unwilling to take part in the Continental System—being a very old ally of England’s, going back to 1383—and it’s also why, ultimately, he invaded Russia after the tsar ripped up the Tilsit agreement and started trading openly with Britain. It’s a fascinating thing that, as you say, the two aggressive wars that Napoleon started began for mercantile protectionist reasons. It was to try to force the merchants of London to put pressure on the Whig and Tory governments to make peace with him.

But the problem with enforcing this policy of economic strangulation against the Brits was their sea power.

Exactly. When you can land anywhere at all, when you can set up various places off the coast of Italy and off the coast of Germany which are effectively massive freebooting piracy operations of free-trade in everything, it’s just something that is not going to work. His attempt to stimulate local production and an industrial revolution in France was also something that never truly got off the ground.

Britain and France are continuously at war from 1803 onwards until Napoleon’s defeat at Waterloo in 1815, a period of war unmatched in any of the other coalitions. What do you think is the main motivation for why the Brits are so uncompromising?

Let’s move on to your next book. This is Duff Cooper’s biography of the diplomat Talleyrand, whose political life encompasses the rise and fall of Napoleon and beyond.

Talleyrand had a totally extraordinary political life. He supported six different separate regimes in his career and, naturally, got a reputation for being a turncoat. Some people have argued, including Duff Cooper in this brilliant biography, that he did have some central messages that he believed all his life—like liberalism and an affection for the English-style constitution. But the key reason to read this book is that it’s literature as much as history. It’s a beautifully written evocation of an era that Duff Cooper, having been British ambassador to Paris, knew well and actually saw the last glimmers of.

It’s incredible that Talleyrand flees the Reign of Terror, goes to England and then to America, returns to France in 1796 and manages to become foreign minister within a year.

And stays foreign minister or in the diplomatic sphere in some way or another for the rest of his life. He thereby met almost all the important people in Europe and was at the table when all the great decisions were made. He was born an aristocrat and was later an unfrocked bishop. He had a lame foot rather like Byron and Goebbels which apparently turns you into a sex maniac; he turned his niece into his mistress which I think today would have him defenestrated but, nonetheless, no one seemed to hold that against him either.

What does the book tell us about the relation between Talleyrand and Napoleon? What are the main ways we can trace his influence on Napoleon as foreign minister or vice-elector?

It tells us that it was always rocky. Napoleon, quite rightly, didn’t trust him. Talleyrand was working especially with the Russians behind Napoleon’s back. Despite being extremely witty and obviously wonderful company, he was a dangerous person to have working for you. Talleyrand generally thought that France should be at peace and, of course, that’s very difficult when you’re the foreign minister of a conqueror.

I don’t see that you can call Napoleon a warmonger given that, as we’ve said, of the seven wars of the coalitions he only started two. But I think there was a legitimist jihad against him and against the French Revolution. And he had to fight those. But, overall, Talleyrand was someone who, as a good negotiator and a diplomat, wanted peace.

And was willing to betray Napoleon’s military secrets in the process?

He was willing to betray absolutely everybody in the process. It wasn’t just Napoleon; he betrayed five different regimes in the course of his life. I’m certain that had he lived any longer, he would have betrayed the July Monarchy as well.

It’s surprising that when Napoleon found out Talleyrand was selling military secrets to his enemies, he didn’t exile or execute him.

This is another reason to recognise that Napoleon is not a proto-Hitler in the way he’s been portrayed by many British historians. If he were a proto-Hitler, he would have shot Talleyrand and Fouché (his police minister) years before. Napoleon was a dictator politically, in that he dictated the laws of France and what happened. But I don’t think he has anything in common with the 20th-century dictators like Lenin, Mussolini, Hitler , and Stalin.

But what about atrocities like executing thousands of prisoners of war in Jaffa, for instance?

When you say “for instance”, that implies that there were 20 or 30 Jaffas but there weren’t. There’s one at Jaffa and then, after that, in 1796 in Padua, Italy, he also let the troops run riot. But other than that, there just aren’t the mass executions. There aren’t the 40,000 people who died during the Reign of Terror, for example.

“Napoleon was a dictator politically in that he dictated the laws of France and what happened. But I don’t think he has anything in common with the 20th-century dictators”

I go into Jaffa in some detail in my book about how the men who he executed had earlier promised to fight against France. And then, six weeks later, they were captured fighting against France. According to the very harsh rules of law in the late eighteenth century, they forfeited their lives.

There’s a stereotype about Napoleon being indifferent to the immense human cost incurred by trying to establish French hegemony in Europe. Do you think this is misguided?

Yes, I think it’s hugely misguided. I think that commanders throughout history have had to harden their hearts to the inevitable losses made, but I don’t think he ever threw men into battle willy-nilly. He was one of the great commanders in history and one of the great soldiers of all time. Great soldiers don’t do that. And he was personally affected. There are times when he’s in tears in his tent after a battle, in the same way that Wellington was.

The idea of him being some cold-hearted unemotional figure profoundly misunderstands him, as does the idea of him being humourless. Throughout my book, there are something like 80 or 90 Napoleon jokes. He was constantly making humorous remarks that even 200 years later remain extremely funny.

I enjoyed the one where, in the midst of battle, an officer has his helmet thrown off by the impact of a cannonball, only for Napoleon to casually remark “It’s a good job you’re not any taller.”

Let’s move on to your third book. This is With Eagles to Glory: Napoleon and His German Allies in the 1809 Campaign by John H. Gill.

This is a tremendously detailed military history of the Danube campaign of 1809. This was a very important campaign because it knocked the Austrians out of the Napoleonic Wars for the third time. The only way for them to deal with Napoleon after that was for the archduchess Marie-Louise to marry Napoleon and try to bring him into the system like that. He fought a lightning campaign up the Danube, capturing Vienna, fighting battles such as Aspern-Essling and Wagram. This is Napoleon at his classic best. You can see him in this book just outmaneuvering the Austrian army again and again.

One of the distinctive things about this book is that it drew a lot of attention to the 30,000 German troops fighting on behalf of Napoleon.

Yes, this book is an important corrective to the idea that Napoleon’s forces were all French. They certainly weren’t. When Napoleon invaded Russia, only something like 55% of his army were French. He invaded Russia with 615,000 men which was the same size as Paris at the time. It’s very important to see the Napoleonic Wars as coalition wars, both on his side and against him. The book does lots of other things as well, but it certainly underlines that very important factor about Napoleon’s wars.

These soldiers were all supplied from the Confederation of the Rhine. Can you tell us about that and when it was established?

It was established at the time of the collapse of the Holy Roman Empire in August 1806. After the Holy Roman Empire vaporised out of existence, it became Napoleon’s tool—his vehicle—for bringing together the north German states. He called himself the “Protector” of the Confederation. They stayed as such for nine years or so before it itself collapsed at the time of the 1813 campaign. The battles of Leipzig and Dresden were pretty much the death-knell for the Confederation of the Rhine.

I want to ask about military culture and attitudes towards Napoleon among soldiers from the client states. Presumably the German troops didn’t have the same patriotic fervour motivating them as French soldiers, but they weren’t indifferent either.

There’s a huge difference. Some of them some of the time are just as enthusiastic about Napoleon as the French. The Polish lancers, for example, believed that Napoleon was going to make Poland an independent state and give it its own sovereignty for the first time since it had been sliced up in the partitions. And so, they were incredibly excited about fighting for Napoleon. In fact, Napoleon is the only individual named in the Polish national anthem. That’s a good one for a pub quiz!

Your last two books are written by people who had great proximity to Napoleon. Let’s look at Private Memoirs Of The Court Of Napoleon by Louis François Joseph Bausset-Roquefort. This seems a fairly unknown book.

Yes, it’s a very little-known book but an extremely interesting one. Bausset was Napoleon’s palace chamberlain who followed him around the campaigns and lived in his palaces. He knew the family very well indeed and wrote these memoirs even though it was dangerous to do that once the Bourbons had been restored. He was still an admirer of Napoleon and is the living personification of the untruth of the epithet that “no man is a hero to his valet.”

Bausset definitely did admire Napoleon—not blind hero-worship by any means, but he was somebody who saw Napoleon for what he was. This book explodes many of the myths about Napoleon being a vicious and unpleasant individual. Instead, he comes across as a good employer, a witty man, and someone who had normal human emotions.

I suppose it says a lot about a person when all of your personal servants are begging to go into exile with you.

Well, exactly. And not just any old exile. One could understand why they might have wanted to go to Elba, which is a perfectly nice, warm, pleasant place. One would go on holiday to Elba, but nobody would go on holiday to Saint Helena. This is a windswept, godforsaken, tiny, eight-by-ten-mile island plopped bang in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. It takes six days by boat to get there from Cape Town, or at least it did before the airport came in. And a very boring journey it is too, I can tell you. And these 21 servants were basically fighting each other for the right to accompany into exile. It shows the charisma of the man.

You mentioned that Bausset goes with him on the campaigns, but what do we find out about Napoleon in a more domestic setting?

That he was a kind husband and a loving father. He was not the domestic monster that the Bourbon literature has been so keen to present him as; many books, I’m afraid, have taken it for granted to be true.

There are some quite eccentric arrangements in Napoleon’s imperial household as well. I’m thinking of his first wife Josephine’s menagerie.

Yes, having orangutans around at lunchtime, zebras in the fields, and black swans at Malmaison. That was her idea, of course, but he indulged it and paid for it. But having exotic animals at that time was very much a royal pursuit and it had been for years. I think Cosimo III de’ Medici had a hippopotamus or something along those lines. It was a way of proving your wealth and status to have unusual animals around. Josephine did actually dress the orangutan in a chemise and have it come to tea parties.

You mentioned that this was to flaunt wealth and status. Was that a slightly sore thing to do considering the tensions building up to the Revolution?

Let’s go on to your final choice. This is the Memoirs of General de Caulaincourt, Duke of Vicenza.

These are fascinating. Caulaincourt was the ambassador to Russia and was also Napoleon’s master of the horse. He was an aristocrat, born and bred. At least according to his memoirs, he was the person who informed Napoleon not to invade Russia. The memoirs were only published in 1935, and there’s no reason why he should have lied in them, owing to the fact that they were never going to be published in his lifetime.

Once he had warned Napoleon, he came with him and was the only person on the sledge that accompanied Napoleon back to France from the catastrophe of the 1812 campaign. It’s in his sledge that we get Napoleon saying “from the sublime to the ridiculous is just one small step.” The memoirs are immensely well-written, encapsulating and pretty crushing for Napoleon’s reputation with regard to the 1812 campaign.

So, it’s not a panegyric?

Not in the slightest. But equally it’s not a denunciation. Caulaincourt stayed with Napoleon up until the 1814 abdication and is a trustworthy source. He’s not anti-Napoleon. It seems that he kept scraps of paper that he used as his notes for this book. It’s a pretty fabulous and invaluable source for the period.

The Russia campaign is regarded as one of the worst defeats in military history. Can you give an outline of the factors that made it so catastrophic?

Napoleon went into Russia on June 21, 1812 with 615,000 men, and by the time he crossed the river Niemen back in the other direction in December, he had lost over half a million of those men. In that sense, you have to go back to the ancient world to see such an enormous military catastrophe.

“Napoleon went into Russia on 21 June 1812 with 615,000 men. By the time he crossed the river Niemen back in the other direction in December, he had lost over half a million of those men”

In a nutshell, the reason was that he was drawn further and further into Russia. He captured Moscow, something that Hitler never did, but he stayed there too long. He won a battle called Maloyaroslavets and decided the next day to retreat back via Borodino, which was a big battle that he’d won on 7 September. It turned out to be the wrong route back and his army was encompassed by blizzards. Although he won each of the formal engagements, the army was swallowed up by the snows of Russia. It’s a story of cannibalism and utter despair and disaster, with a few flashes of redemption such as the crossing of the Berezina river. Otherwise, it’s up there with Xenophon.

We’ve mentioned it already, but it’s important to keep in mind that Napoleon wasn’t marching on Russia to try and annex it. He was trying to force Russia’s compliance with the Continental System.

Yes, he had no territorial desires. He had an army twice the size of the Russian one, and had defeated the Russians twice before. Napoleon only intended to fight on the outskirts; he only intended to go in 50 miles or so and wanted a three-week campaign. Instead, it turned out to be a six-month campaign and carried on for literally thousands of miles there and back. It’s a classic example of mission creep.

The Russians also pursued a scorched earth policy, rather like they did in 1941 and 1942, which meant that there was mass starvation. Napoleon lost 100,000 of the troops of his central thrust to typhus—a horrible disease where a louse will bury itself into your skin and then defecate in your skin and then die. You then die about four days later in immense pain. It’s a horrible way to go.

With armies in those days, everyone had lice. If the weather’s too cold for you to change your clothes more than once every six weeks or so, then you’re going to get lice. The soldiers all huddled together, very close to one another, because it was so cold outside. So, their lice jumped from one soldier to another. There wasn’t a single person, including the emperor, who didn’t have lice. They didn’t work out a cure for typhus until 1911; it wasn’t properly diagnosed until over a century later. It was, in every way, an absolute nightmare of a campaign.

It’s largely remembered for the merciless winter, but the immense heat of the summer advance was almost as damaging.

That killed a lot of horses. And, of course, it’s almost entirely a horse-and-bullock-drawn invasion. The heat and the thirst were appalling on the way into Russia, yes. It was biblical.

There are three more years before Waterloo in 1815 but, in your view, was the Russian campaign the turning point?

Yes. Up until 1811, Napoleon was the master of Europe. From December 1812 onwards, he was on the skids. You can’t lose half a million men and not expect your throne to topple.

But he went out fighting.

He did. The 1814 campaign involved small numbers of men but, nonetheless, he won four battles in five days there. He was back to his old form. These were significant, rather brilliant military victories. But, in the end, with the whole of Europe against him and invading, he was fought to a standstill and then very comprehensively defeated at the Battle of Waterloo.

Just to end, what do you consider to be Napoleon’s greatest achievements that have endured?

I think the beauty of Paris is very largely down to him. He rebuilt Paris. We love going and taking our loved ones there and crossing the four bridges that he built and seeing the fountains and great buildings like the Madeleine Church. That’s a testament to him. He designed the Arc de Triomphe , but it was only built after his death. Although as an Englishman I prefer English common law, nonetheless the whole of French and European law is much more closely built on the Napoleonic Code than anything that had gone before, including Roman law. Napoleon is someone who every Frenchman should be proud of. Other things like the Légion d’honneur and the Conseil d’État are still around. In fact, the numbering of its houses in its streets from the Seine outwards is all down to him. There are also the reservoirs. Even 200 years after his death, it’s difficult to imagine Paris or France without the influence of Napoleon Bonaparte.

October 28, 2019

Five Books aims to keep its book recommendations and interviews up to date. If you are the interviewee and would like to update your choice of books (or even just what you say about them) please email us at [email protected]

Andrew Roberts

Andrew Roberts is a British historian and journalist. He is a Visiting Professor at the Department of War Studies, King's College London, a Roger and Martha Mertz Visiting Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, and a Lehrman Institute Distinguished Lecturer at the New York Historical Society. He has written or edited nineteen books—including internationally bestselling biographies of Napoleon Bonaparte and Winston Churchill—which have been translated into 23 languages.

We ask experts to recommend the five best books in their subject and explain their selection in an interview.

This site has an archive of more than one thousand seven hundred interviews, or eight thousand book recommendations. We publish at least two new interviews per week.

Five Books participates in the Amazon Associate program and earns money from qualifying purchases.

© Five Books 2024

• Recent changes
• Random page
• View source
• What links here
• Related changes
• Special pages
• Printable version
• Permanent link
• Page information
• Create account

Top Ten Books on Napoleon Bonaparte

• Napoleon: A Concise Biography by David A. Bell

David Bell emphasizes the astonishing sense of human possibility--for both good and ill--that Napoleon represented. By his late twenties, Napoleon was already one of the greatest generals in European history. At thirty, he had become an absolute master of Europe's most powerful country. In his early forties, he ruled a European empire more powerful than any since Rome, fighting wars that changed the shape of the continent and brought death to millions. Then everything collapsed, leading him to spend his last years in miserable exile in the South Atlantic.

Bell emphasizes the importance of the French Revolution in understanding Napoleon's career. The revolution made possible the unprecedented concentration of political authority that Napoleon accrued, and his success in mobilizing human and material resources. Without the political changes brought about by the revolution, Napoleon could not have fought his wars. Without the wars, he could not have seized and held onto power. Though his virtual dictatorship betrayed the ideals of liberty and equality, his life and career were revolutionary.

• Napoleon: The Path to Power by Philip Dwyer

Philip Dwyer sheds new light on Napoleon’s inner life—especially his darker side and his passions—to reveal a ruthless, manipulative, driven man whose character has been disguised by the public image he carefully fashioned to suit the purposes of his ambition. Dwyer focuses acutely on Napoleon’s formative years, from his Corsican origins to his French education, from his melancholy youth to his flirtation with radicals of the French Revolution, from his first military campaigns in Italy and Egypt to the political-military coup that brought him to power in 1799. One of the first truly modern politicians, Napoleon was a master of “spin,” using the media to project an idealized image of himself. Dwyer’s biography of the young Napoleon provides a fascinating new perspective on one of the great figures of modern history.

• Napoleon: A Life by Adam Zamoyski

The story of Napoleon has been written many times. In some versions, he is a military genius, in others a war-obsessed tyrant. Here, historian Adam Zamoyski cuts through the mythology and explains Napoleon against the background of the European Enlightenment, and what he was himself seeking to achieve. This most famous of men is also the most hidden of men, and Zamoyski dives deeper than any previous biographer to find him. Beautifully written, Napoleon brilliantly sets the man in his European context.

• The Campaigns of Napoleon by David G Chandler

The Napoleonic wars were nothing if not complex—an ever-shifting kaleidoscope of moves and intentions, which by themselves went a long way towards baffling and dazing his conventionally-minded opponents into that state of disconcerting moral disequilibrium which so often resulted in their catastrophic defeat.

The Campaigns of Napoleon is an exhaustive analysis and critique of Napoleon's art of war as he himself developed and perfected it in the major military campaigns of his career. Napoleon disavowed any suggestion that he worked from formula (“Je n'ai jamais eu un plan d'opérations”), but military historian David Chandler demonstrates this was at best only a half-truth. To be sure, every operation Napoleon conducted contained unique improvisatory features. But there were from the first to the last certain basic principles of strategic maneuver and battlefield planning that he almost invariably put into practice. To clarify these underlying methods, as well as the style of Napoleon's fabulous intellect, Mr. Chandler examines in detail each campaign mounted and personally conducted by Napoleon, analyzing the strategies employed, revealing wherever possible the probable sources of his subject's military ideas.

Unfortunately, this is an older book and it only comes in hardcover. Due to its high price, we recommend that you check it out from a library.

• With Eagles to Glory: Napoleon and His German Allies in the 1809 Campaign by John H Gill

When Napoleon’s Grand Armee went to war against the might of the Habsburg empire in 1809, its forces included more than 100,000 allied German troops. From his earliest imperial campaigns, these troops provided played a key role as Napoleon swept from victory to victory and in 1809 their fighting abilities were crucial to the campaign. With Napoleon’s French troops depleted and debilitated after the long struggle in the Spanish War, the German troops for the first time played a major combat role in the center of the battle line.

In this epic work, John Gill presents an unprecedented and comprehensive study of this year of glory for the German soldiers fighting for Napoleon, When combat opened they were in the thick of the action, fighting within French divisions and often without any French support at all. They demonstrated tremendous skill, courage and loyalty.

• The Invisible Emperor: Napoleon on Elba From Exile to Escape by Mark Braude

In the spring of 1814, Napoleon Bonaparte was defeated. Having overseen an empire spanning half the European continent and governed the lives of some eighty million people, he suddenly found himself exiled to Elba, less than a hundred square miles of territory. Braude dramatizes this strange exile and improbable escape in granular detail and with novelistic relish, offering sharp new insights into a largely overlooked moment. He details a terrific cast of secondary characters, including Napoleon’s tragically-noble official British minder on Elba, Neil Campbell, forever disgraced for having let “Boney” slip away; and his young second wife, Marie Louise who was twenty-two to Napoleon’s forty-four, at the time of his abdication. What emerges is a surprising new perspective on one of history’s most consequential figures, which both subverts and celebrates his legendary persona.

• Waterloo by Alan Forrest

The Battle of Waterloo has cast a long shadow over Europe. It ended the French Empire and Napoleon's aspirations and it significantly altered the direction of Europe. Unsurprisingly, the meaning and significance of Waterloo are different for all of the countries that participated in the battle. Alan Forrest walks through the reader through the battle but explores the consequences and the interpretations of Waterloo. Forrest answers how we remember Waterloo. Britain, France, Belgium, Germany, and the Netherlands all view Waterloo through different a lens.

• The End of the Old Order (Vol.1) by Frederick Kagan

Perhaps no person in history has dominated his or her own era as much as Napoleon. Despite his small physical stature, the shadow of Napoleon is cast like a colossus, compelling all who would look at that epoch to chart their course by reference to him. For this reason, most historical accounts of the Napoleonic era-and there are many-tell the same Napoleon-dominated story over and over again or focus narrowly on special aspects of it.

Frederick Kagan, a distinguished historian and military policy expert, has tapped hitherto unused archival materials from Austria, Prussia, France, and Russia, to present the history of these years from the balanced perspective of all of the major players of Europe. In The End of the Old Order readers encounter the rulers, ministers, citizens, and subjects of Europe in all of their political and military activity-from the desk of the prime minister to the pen of the ambassador, from the map of the general to the rifle of the soldier.

• The Great Retreat: Napoleon's Grand Armée in Russia by Alexander Korolev

The Great Retreat is an unprecedented, visually rich account of Napoleon’s march back from Moscow, built on a remarkable discovery of newly unearthed artifacts and archival sources. It tells the story of how Napoleon lost nearly 400,000 men to the brutal cold, poor planning, and effectively destructive harrying of the Russian army at his heels. Featuring more than 1,600 illustrations and detailed biographies of all 289 regiments and units involved in the retreat, supplemented by unforgettable eyewitness accounts, this book brings Napoleon’s retreat, and its unfathomable human cost, to life in a wholly new way. No student of Napoleon or fan of military or Russian history will want to miss it.

• The Fatal Knot: The Guerrilla War in Navarre and the Defeat of Napoleon in Spain by John Lawrence Tone

John Tone recounts the dramatic story of how, between 1808 and 1814, Spanish peasants created and sustained the world's first guerrilla insurgency movement, thereby playing a major role in Napoleon's defeat in the Peninsula War. Focusing on the army of Francisco Mina, Tone offers new insights into the origins, motives, and successes of these first guerrilla forces by interpreting the conflict from the long-ignored perspective of the guerrillas themselves.

Only months after Napoleon's invasion in 1807, Spain seemed ready to fall: its rulers were in prison or in exile, its armies were in complete disarray, and Madrid had been occupied. However, the Spanish people themselves, particularly the peasants of Navarre, proved unexpectedly resilient. In response to impending defeat, they formed makeshift governing juntas, raised new armies, and initiated a new kind of people's war of national liberation that came to be known as guerrilla warfare. Key to the peasants' success, says Tone, was the fact that they possessed both the material means and the motives to resist. The guerrillas were neither bandits nor selfless patriots but landowning peasants who fought to protect the old regime in Navarre and their established position within it.

• Talleyrand by Duff Cooper

While this book is not specifically about Napoleon, it examines the early 19th century through Tallyrand. Tallyrand was the French Foreign Minister for multiple French regimes and one of the most interesting and remarkable diplomats of the 19th century. Unique in his own age and a phenomenon in any, Charles-Maurice, Prince de Talleyrand, was a statesman of outstanding ability and extraordinary contradictions. He was a world-class rogue who held high office in five successive regimes. A well-known opportunist and a notorious bribe taker, Talleyrand’s gifts to France arguably outvalued the vast personal fortune he amassed in her service.

Once a supporter of the Revolution, after the fall of the monarchy, he fled to England and then to the United States. Talleyrand returned to France two years later and served under Napoleon, and represented France at the Congress of Vienna. Duff Cooper’s classic biography contains all the vigor, elegance, and intellect of its remarkable subject.

Dailyhistory.org is an Amazon Associate and earns money from links (primarily to books) from Amazon.

• French History
• This page was last edited on 26 October 2021, at 23:27.
• Privacy policy
• About DailyHistory.org
• Disclaimers
• Mobile view

• History Classics
• Your Profile
• Find History on Facebook (Opens in a new window)
• Find History on Twitter (Opens in a new window)
• Find History on YouTube (Opens in a new window)
• Find History on Instagram (Opens in a new window)
• Find History on TikTok (Opens in a new window)
• This Day In History
• History Podcasts
• History Vault

Napoleon Bonaparte

By: History.com Editors

Updated: April 24, 2023 | Original: November 9, 2009

Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821), also known as Napoleon I, was a French military leader and emperor who conquered much of Europe in the early 19th century. Born on the island of Corsica, Napoleon rapidly rose through the ranks of the military during the French Revolution (1789-1799). After seizing political power in France in a 1799 coup d’état, he crowned himself emperor in 1804. Shrewd, ambitious and a skilled military strategist, Napoleon successfully waged war against various coalitions of European nations and expanded his empire. However, after a disastrous French invasion of Russia in 1812, Napoleon abdicated the throne two years later and was exiled to the island of Elba. In 1815, he briefly returned to power in his Hundred Days campaign. After a crushing defeat at the Battle of Waterloo, he abdicated once again and was exiled to the remote island of Saint Helena, where he died at 51.

Napoleon’s Education and Early Military Career

Napoleon Bonaparte was born on August 15, 1769, in Ajaccio, on the Mediterranean island of Corsica. He was the second of eight surviving children born to Carlo Buonaparte (1746-1785), a lawyer, and Letizia Romalino Buonaparte (1750-1836). Although his parents were members of the minor Corsican nobility, the family was not wealthy. The year before Napoleon’s birth, France acquired Corsica from the city-state of Genoa, Italy. Napoleon later adopted a French spelling of his last name.

As a boy, Napoleon attended school in mainland France, where he learned the French language, and went on to graduate from a French military academy in 1785. He then became a second lieutenant in an artillery regiment of the French army. The French Revolution began in 1789, and within three years revolutionaries had overthrown the monarchy and proclaimed a French republic. During the early years of the revolution, Napoleon was largely on leave from the military and home in Corsica, where he became affiliated with the Jacobins, a pro-democracy political group. In 1793, following a clash with the nationalist Corsican governor, Pasquale Paoli (1725-1807), the Bonaparte family fled their native island for mainland France, where Napoleon returned to military duty.

In France, Napoleon became associated with Augustin Robespierre (1763-1794), the brother of revolutionary leader Maximilien Robespierre (1758-1794), a Jacobin who was a key force behind the Reign of Terror (1793-1794), a period of violence against enemies of the revolution. During this time, Napoleon was promoted to the rank of brigadier general in the army. However, after Robespierre fell from power and was guillotined (along with Augustin) in July 1794, Napoleon was briefly put under house arrest for his ties to the brothers.

In 1795, Napoleon helped suppress a royalist insurrection against the revolutionary government in Paris and was promoted to major general.

Did you know? In 1799, during Napoleon’s military campaign in Egypt, a French soldier named Pierre Francois Bouchard (1772-1832) discovered the Rosetta Stone. This artifact provided the key to cracking the code of Egyptian hieroglyphics, a written language that had been dead for almost 2,000 years.

Napoleon’s Rise to Power

Since 1792, France’s revolutionary government had been engaged in military conflicts with various European nations. In 1796, Napoleon commanded a French army that defeated the larger armies of Austria, one of his country’s primary rivals, in a series of battles in Italy. In 1797, France and Austria signed the Treaty of Campo Formio, resulting in territorial gains for the French.

The following year, the Directory, the five-person group that had governed France since 1795, offered to let Napoleon lead an invasion of England. Napoleon determined that France’s naval forces were not yet ready to go up against the superior British Royal Navy. Instead, he proposed an invasion of Egypt in an effort to wipe out British trade routes with India. Napoleon’s troops scored a victory against Egypt’s military rulers, the Mamluks, at the Battle of the Pyramids in July 1798; soon, however, his forces were stranded after his naval fleet was nearly decimated by the British at the Battle of the Nile in August 1798. In early 1799, Napoleon’s army launched an invasion of Ottoman Empire -ruled Syria , which ended with a failed siege of Acre, located in modern-day Israel . That summer, with the political situation in France marked by uncertainty, the ever-ambitious and cunning Napoleon opted to abandon his army in Egypt and return to France.

The Coup of 18 Brumaire

In November 1799, in an event known as the coup of 18 Brumaire, Napoleon was part of a group that successfully overthrew the French Directory.

The Directory was replaced with a three-member Consulate, and 5'7" Napoleon became first consul, making him France’s leading political figure. In June 1800, at the Battle of Marengo, Napoleon’s forces defeated one of France’s perennial enemies, the Austrians, and drove them out of Italy. The victory helped cement Napoleon’s power as first consul. Additionally, with the Treaty of Amiens in 1802, the war-weary British agreed to peace with the French (although the peace would only last for a year).

Napoleon worked to restore stability to post-revolutionary France. He centralized the government; instituted reforms in such areas as banking and education; supported science and the arts; and sought to improve relations between his regime and the pope (who represented France’s main religion, Catholicism), which had suffered during the revolution. One of his most significant accomplishments was the Napoleonic Code , which streamlined the French legal system and continues to form the foundation of French civil law to this day.

In 1802, a constitutional amendment made Napoleon first consul for life. Two years later, in 1804, he crowned himself emperor of France in a lavish ceremony at the Cathedral of Notre Dame in Paris.

Napoleon’s Marriages and Children

In 1796, Napoleon married Josephine de Beauharnais (1763-1814), a stylish widow six years his senior who had two teenage children. More than a decade later, in 1809, after Napoleon had no offspring of his own with Empress Josephine, he had their marriage annulled so he could find a new wife and produce an heir. In 1810, he wed Marie Louise (1791-1847), the daughter of the emperor of Austria. The following year, she gave birth to their son, Napoleon François Joseph Charles Bonaparte (1811-1832), who became known as Napoleon II and was given the title king of Rome. In addition to his son with Marie Louise, Napoleon had several illegitimate children.

The Reign of Napoleon I

From 1803 to 1815, France was engaged in the Napoleonic Wars, a series of major conflicts with various coalitions of European nations. In 1803, partly as a means to raise funds for future wars, Napoleon sold France’s Louisiana Territory in North America to the newly independent United States for $15 million, a transaction that later became known as the Louisiana Purchase .

In October 1805, the British wiped out Napoleon’s fleet at the Battle of Trafalgar . However, in December of that same year, Napoleon achieved what is considered to be one of his greatest victories at the Battle of Austerlitz, in which his army defeated the Austrians and Russians. The victory resulted in the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire and the creation of the Confederation of the Rhine.

Beginning in 1806, Napoleon sought to wage large-scale economic warfare against Britain with the establishment of the so-called Continental System of European port blockades against British trade. In 1807, following Napoleon’s defeat of the Russians at Friedland in Prussia, Alexander I (1777-1825) was forced to sign a peace settlement, the Treaty of Tilsit. In 1809, the French defeated the Austrians at the Battle of Wagram, resulting in further gains for Napoleon.

During these years, Napoleon reestablished a French aristocracy (eliminated in the French Revolution) and began handing out titles of nobility to his loyal friends and family as his empire continued to expand across much of western and central continental Europe.

Napoleon’s Downfall and First Abdication

In 1810, Russia withdrew from the Continental System. In retaliation, Napoleon led a massive army into Russia in the summer of 1812. Rather than engaging the French in a full-scale battle, the Russians adopted a strategy of retreating whenever Napoleon’s forces attempted to attack. As a result, Napoleon’s troops trekked deeper into Russia despite being ill-prepared for an extended campaign.

In September, both sides suffered heavy casualties in the indecisive Battle of Borodino. Napoleon’s forces marched on to Moscow, only to discover almost the entire population evacuated. Retreating Russians set fires across the city in an effort to deprive enemy troops of supplies. After waiting a month for a surrender that never came, Napoleon, faced with the onset of the Russian winter, was forced to order his starving, exhausted army out of Moscow. During the disastrous retreat, his army suffered continual harassment from a suddenly aggressive and merciless Russian army. Of Napoleon’s 600,000 troops who began the campaign, only an estimated 100,000 made it out of Russia.

At the same time as the catastrophic Russian invasion, French forces were engaged in the Peninsular War (1808-1814), which resulted in the Spanish and Portuguese, with assistance from the British, driving the French from the Iberian Peninsula. This loss was followed in 1813 by the Battle of Leipzig , also known as the Battle of Nations, in which Napoleon’s forces were defeated by a coalition that included Austrian, Prussian, Russian and Swedish troops. Napoleon then retreated to France, and in March 1814 coalition forces captured Paris.

On April 6, 1814, Napoleon, then in his mid-40s, was forced to abdicate the throne. With the Treaty of Fontainebleau, he was exiled to Elba, a Mediterranean island off the coast of Italy. He was given sovereignty over the small island, while his wife and son went to Austria.

HISTORY Vault: Napoleon Bonaparte: The Glory of France

Explore the extraordinary life and times of Napoleon Bonaparte, the great military genius who took France to unprecedented heights of power, and then brought it to its knees when his ego spun out of control.

Hundred Days Campaign and Battle of Waterloo

On February 26, 1815, after less than a year in exile, Napoleon escaped Elba and sailed to the French mainland with a group of more than 1,000 supporters. On March 20, he returned to Paris, where he was welcomed by cheering crowds. The new king, Louis XVIII (1755-1824), fled, and Napoleon began what came to be known as his Hundred Days campaign.

Upon Napoleon’s return to France, a coalition of allies–the Austrians, British, Prussians and Russians–who considered the French emperor an enemy began to prepare for war. Napoleon raised a new army and planned to strike preemptively, defeating the allied forces one by one before they could launch a united attack against him.

In June 1815, his forces invaded Belgium, where British and Prussian troops were stationed. On June 16, Napoleon’s troops defeated the Prussians at the Battle of Ligny. However, two days later, on June 18, at the Battle of Waterloo near Brussels, the French were crushed by the British, with assistance from the Prussians.

On June 22, 1815, Napoleon was once again forced to abdicate.

Napoleon’s Final Years

In October 1815, Napoleon was exiled to the remote, British-held island of Saint Helena, in the South Atlantic Ocean. He died there on May 5, 1821, at age 51, most likely from stomach cancer. (During his time in power, Napoleon often posed for paintings with his hand in his vest, leading to some speculation after his death that he had been plagued by stomach pain for years.) Napoleon was buried on the island despite his request to be laid to rest “on the banks of the Seine, among the French people I have loved so much.” In 1840, his remains were returned to France and entombed in a crypt at Les Invalides in Paris, where other French military leaders are interred.

Napoleon Bonaparte Quotes

• “The only way to lead people is to show them a future: a leader is a dealer in hope.”
• “Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.”
• “Envy is a declaration of inferiority.”
• “The reason most people fail instead of succeed is they trade what they want most for what they want at the moment.”
• “If you wish to be a success in the world, promise everything, deliver nothing.”

Sign up for Inside History

Get HISTORY’s most fascinating stories delivered to your inbox three times a week.

By submitting your information, you agree to receive emails from HISTORY and A+E Networks. You can opt out at any time. You must be 16 years or older and a resident of the United States.

More details : Privacy Notice | Terms of Use | Contact Us

Napoleon Bonaparte

French military general Napoleon Bonaparte crowned himself the first emperor of France in 1804. His Napoleonic Code remains a model for governments worldwide.

We may earn commission from links on this page, but we only recommend products we back.

Latest News: Napoleon Movie in Theaters Now

Napoleon has received some flack for its historical inaccuracies , such as showing the titular character shooting at pyramids. “If you want to really understand Napoleon, then you should probably do your own studying and reading,” Phoenix previously told Empire magazine . “Because if you see this film, it’s this experience told through Ridley’s eyes... What we were after was something that would capture the feeling of this man.”

Quick Facts

Early life and military education, how tall was napoleon, napoleon’s rise to power, wives: empress josephine and marie-louise, napoleonic code, napoleonic wars, exile on st. helena, death and tomb, napoleon movies, who was napoleon bonaparte.

French General Napoleon Bonaparte was one of the world’s greatest military leaders who became the first emperor of France, from 1804 to 1815. Born on the Mediterranean island of Corsica, he attended military schools in France and eventually embraced his adopted home. Bonaparte steadily rose to power in the tumult of the French Revolution before seizing power in a 1799 coup. He was elected consul for life in 1802, then proclaimed the French emperor two years later. As a political leader, Bonaparte broadly transformed French society, most notably ushering in the Napoleonic Code that still serves as the basis of civil codes around the world today. During the Napoleonic Wars, the famed military tactician expanded France’s footprint before a string of critical losses forced him into exile. Bonaparte spent the final years of his life on the remote island of St. Helena, where he died in 1821 at age 51.

FULL NAME: Napoleon Bonaparte BORN: August 15, 1769 DIED: May 5, 1821 BIRTHPLACE: Ajaccio, Corsica SPOUSES: Josephine de Beauharnais (1796-1809) and Archduchess Marie-Louise (1810-1821) CHILDREN: Charles, Alexandre, and Napoleon II ASTROLOGICAL SIGN: Leo HEIGHT: 5 ft. 7 in.

Napoleon Bonaparte was born Napoleone Buonaparte in Ajaccio, on the French island of Corsica, on August 15, 1769. He was the fourth, and second surviving, child of Carlo Buonaparte, a lawyer, and his wife, Letizia Ramolino. Napoleon eventually had seven surviving siblings.

Around the time of Napoleon’s birth, the French’s occupation of Corsica had drawn considerable local resistance. Napoleon’s father had at first supported the nationalists, siding with their leader, Pasquale Paoli. But after Paoli was forced to flee the island, Carlo switched his allegiance to the French. After doing so, he was appointed assessor of the judicial district of Ajaccio in 1771, a plush job that eventually enabled him to enroll his two sons, Joseph and Napoleon, in France’s College d’Autun.

In 1779, young Napoleon began attending the military college of Brienne, where he studied for five years. He excelled as a student yet struggled to fit in with his classmates who were the children of French nobles and bullied Napoleon for being a foreigner.

At age 15, Napoleon moved on to the military academy in Paris. While Napoleon was still there, his father died of stomach cancer in 1785. This propelled Napoleon to take the reins as the head of the family. Graduating early from the military academy, Napoleon, now second lieutenant of artillery, returned to Corsica in 1786.

Back home, Napoleon got behind the Corsican resistance to the French occupation, siding with his father’s former ally, Pasquale Paoli. But the two soon had a falling out, and when a civil war in Corsica began in April 1793, Napoleon—now an enemy of Paoli—and his family relocated to France, where they assumed the French version of their name: Bonaparte.

Napoleon stood about 5 feet, 7 inches tall, making him slightly taller than the average Frenchman of his time.

Much has been made of Napoleon’s height, and legends claim that he was unusually short, giving rise to the term “Napoleon complex,” an inferiority complex sometimes associated with people of short stature. Some historians attribute the myths about Napoleon’s height to British propaganda.

Napoleon’s return to France began with a service with the French military, where he rejoined his regiment at Nice in June 1793. The turmoil of the French Revolution , which began four years prior, created opportunities for ambitious military leaders like Napoleon. The young leader quickly showed his support for the Jacobins, a far-left political movement and the most well-known and popular political club from the French Revolution.

A year after France was declared a republic, King Louis XVI was executed in January 1793. Ultimately, these acts led to the rise of Maximilien de Robespierre and what became, essentially, the dictatorship of the Committee of Public Safety. The years of 1793 and 1794 came to be known as the Reign of Terror , in which as many as 40,000 people were killed. Eventually, the Jacobins fell from power, and Robespierre was executed.

Trusted Military Leader

In 1795, the French revolutionary government known as the Directory took control of the country. Napoleon, who had previously fallen out of favor with Robespierre, came into the good graces of the Directory that same year after he saved the government from counter-revolutionary forces. For his efforts, Napoleon was soon named commander of the Army of the Interior. In addition, he was a trusted advisor to the Directory on military matters.

In 1796, Napoleon took the helm of the Army of Italy, a post he’d been coveting. The army—just 30,000 strong, disgruntled, and underfed—was soon turned around by the young military commander. Under his direction, the reinvigorated army won numerous crucial victories against the Austrians, greatly expanded the French empire, and squashed an internal threat by the royalists, who wished to return France to a monarchy. All of these successes helped make Napoleon the military’s brightest star.

Failed Egypt Campaign

On July 1, 1798, Napoleon and his army traveled to the Middle East to undermine Great Britain’s empire by occupying Egypt and disrupting English trade routes to India. But his military campaign proved disastrous: On August 1, Admiral Horatio Nelson’s fleet decimated Napoleon’s forces in the Battle of the Nile.

Napoleon’s image and that of France were greatly harmed by the loss, and in a show of newfound confidence against the commander, Britain, Austria, Russia, and Turkey formed a new coalition against France. In the spring of 1799, French armies were defeated in Italy, forcing France to give up much of the peninsula. That October, Napoleon returned to France as his troops continued fighting.

Coup of 18 Brumaire

Shortly after his return to France, Napoleon participated in an event known as the Coup of 18 Brumaire. The bloodless coup d’etat, heavily orchestrated by Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès, overthrew the newly Jacobin-controlled Directory on November 9, 1799. Napoleon and Sieyès ushered in a new government called the Consulate to be led by three members—themselves and Pierre-Roger Ducos. Napoleon’s brother Lucien Bonaparte also assisted the cause.

When Napoleon was named first consul, he became France’s leading political figure in a position that amounted to nothing less than a dictatorship. Under the new guidelines, the first consul was permitted to appoint ministers, generals, civil servants, magistrates, and even members of the legislative assemblies. Sieyès and Ducos were reduced to figureheads. In February 1800, the new constitution was easily accepted.

At the Battle of Marengo in June 1800, Napoleon’s forces defeated the Austrians and drove them from the Italian peninsula. This military victory cemented Napoleon’s authority as first consul.

Napoleon proceeded to transform France’s economy, legal and educational systems, and even the Church, as he reinstated Roman Catholicism as the state religion through the Concordat of 1801. He also negotiated a European peace, partially through the 1802 Treaty of Amiens that struck a (short-lived) truce with the war-weary British.

His reforms proved popular: In 1802, he was elected consul for life, and two years later, he was proclaimed emperor of France on May 18, 1804. He was officially crowned Napoleon I during his coronation at Notre Dame Cathedral on December 2 of that year.

As Napoleon was rising in the ranks, his personal life was also taking shape. He met Josephine de Beauharnais, the widow of General Alexandre de Beauharnais (guillotined during the Reign of Terror) and a mother of two children, at a party in 1795. He was quickly smitten and despite her initial reservations— Josephine described Napoleon as “altogether strange in all his person”—they married on March 9, 1796, in a civil ceremony.

Their union was tempestuous from the outset, with Napoleon’s military campaigns forcing him away from home for long periods. Although he often complimented Josephine in letters from the battlefield, both of them engaged in extramarital affairs. Napoleon had at least two children out of wedlock—Charles Léon Denuelle in 1806 and Alexandre Walewski in 1810.

Josephine was known for holding lavish parties and spending money on clothing and property, including the Malmaison estate near Paris in 1799. Despite their arguments, the two stayed together as Josephine maintained a positive perception among the public. When Napoleon crowned himself emperor in 1804, he insisted upon placing a crown upon Empress Josephine as well.

Despite his new title, not all was going to plan for Napoleon. He faced mounting pressure from his family to separate from Josephine, who was in her 40s by this point, because she was unable to give him a legitimate son and, thus, an heir. So in December 1809, Napoleon arranged for the annulment of their marriage.

Following the annulment, Napoleon searched in haste for a new bride. His first choice was Anna Pavlovna, the 15-year-old sister of Russian Tsar Alexander I. But after delays and excuses, he instead selected Archduchess Marie-Louise of Austria, 18, due largely to political motivations. Marie-Louise was the great-niece of Marie Antoinette . She dreaded the idea , writing in her diary that just looking at Napoleon would be the “worst form of torture.” However, she complied and married Napoleon by proxy in a civil ceremony in March 1810.

Marie-Louise gave Napoleon the heir he desired, as the couple had a son—Napoleon II, King of Rome—on March 20, 1811.

Despite his marriage to Marie-Louise, Napoleon continued his correspondence with Josephine and made unannounced personal visits to Malmaison. In 1813, he even brought his young son to meet her, as their struggle to produce an heir “had cost her so many tears.” This stoked jealousy in Marie-Louise, who remained married to Napoleon until his death.

Continuing the societal reforms he made, Napoleon instituted the Napoleonic Code, otherwise known as the French Civil Code, on March 21, 1804. The sweeping set of laws ended the feudal system and addressed property rights, family law, and individual freedoms. It forbade privileges based on birth, declaring all men to be equal and stating that government jobs must be given to the most qualified. Men were entitled to religious freedom and placed in charge of the women and children in their families. Women were largely left without rights, though they did have limited liberties in divorce proceedings.

The Napoleonic Code applied in France and its growing number of territories. Napoleon correctly predicted that his code, more so than his many military victories, would have a lasting legacy. Parts of it are still in use around the world today. The terms of the code are the main basis for many other countries’ civil codes throughout Europe and North America.

The Napoleonic Wars were a series of European wars lasting from 1803 to Napoleon’s permanent abdication of power in 1815.

In 1803, in part to raise funds for war, France sold its North American Louisiana Territory to the United States for $15 million, a transaction known as the Louisiana Purchase . Napoleon then returned to war with Britain, Russia, and Austria.

In 1805, the British registered an important naval victory against France at the Battle of Trafalgar , which led Napoleon to scrap his plans to invade England. Instead, he set his sights on Austria and Russia, beating back both militaries in the Battle of Austerlitz.

Other victories soon followed, allowing Napoleon to greatly expand the French empire and paving the way for loyalists to his government—including his brothers and other family members—to be installed in Holland, Italy, Naples, Sweden, Spain, and Westphalia.

Invasion of Russia

In 1812, France was devastated when Napoleon’s invasion of Russia turned out to be a colossal failure—and the beginning of the end for Napoleon. Hundreds of thousands of soldiers in Napoleon’s Grand Army were killed or badly wounded: Out of an original fighting force of some 600,000 men, just 10,000 soldiers were still fit for battle.

News of the defeat reinvigorated Napoleon’s enemies, both inside and outside of France. Some attempted a failed coup while Napoleon led his charge against Russia and as the British began to advance through French territories. With international pressure mounting and his government lacking the resources to fight back against his enemies, Napoleon surrendered to allied forces on March 30, 1814.

First Exile

About a week later, on April 6, Napoleon was forced to abdicate power and went into exile on the island of Elba off the Italian coast in the Mediterranean Sea. His exile didn’t last long, as he watched France stumbled forward without him.

In March 1815, Napoleon escaped the island and quickly made his way back to Paris. King Louis XVIII fled, and Napoleon triumphantly returned to power. But the enthusiasm that greeted Napoleon when he resumed control of the government soon gave way to old frustrations and fears about his leadership.

On June 16, 1815, Napoleon led French troops into Belgium and defeated the Prussians; two days later, he was defeated by the British, reinforced by Prussian fighters, at the Battle of Waterloo .

It was a humiliating loss, and on June 22, 1815, Napoleon abdicated his powers for good. In an effort to prolong his dynasty, he pushed to have his young son, Napoleon II, named emperor, but the coalition rejected the offer.

After Napoleon’s abdication from power in 1815, fearing a repeat of his earlier return from exile on Elba, the British government sent Napoleon to the remote island of St. Helena in the southern Atlantic Ocean. He lived there for the rest of his life.

For the most part, Napoleon was free to do as he pleased at his new home. He had leisurely mornings, wrote often, and read a lot. But the tedious routine of life soon got to him, and he often shut himself indoors.

According to historian Kate Williams’ 2014 book Ambition and Desire: The Dangerous Life of Josephine Bonaparte , Napoleon continued to show great affection for his ex-wife , who died of pneumonia at her Malmaison estate in May 1814. He had portraits of Josephine placed throughout his residence and even ate off plates with her likeness on them.

Starting in 1817, Napoleon’s health began to deteriorate. In early 1821, he was bedridden and growing weaker by the day. That April, he dictated his last will: “I wish my ashes to rest on the banks of the Seine, in the midst of that French people which I have loved so much. I die before my time, killed by the English oligarchy and its hired assassins.”

Napoleon died on May 5, 1821, on the island of St. Helena at age 51. Allegedly, he uttered his ex-wife Josephine’s name as his final word.

During his final weeks, he experienced symptoms such as vomiting, incessant hiccups, and blood clots. Physicians who conducted his autopsy ruled stomach cancer, exacerbated by bleeding gastric ulcers, as the cause of Napoleon’s death. According to PBS News Hour , Napoleon’s cancer was in an advanced state, and his family history of gastric carcinomas supported the autopsy results.

However, researchers have posited alternative theories regarding his demise. In 1961, Swedish dentist Sten Forshufvud and Drs. Hamilton Smith and Anders Wassen analyzed a sample of his hair and published an article suggesting he might have died from arsenic poisoning. Although other experts have rebuffed this theory, it has led to conspiracies surrounding Napoleon’s death.

Despite what he requested in his last will, Napoleon was initially buried on St. Helena on May 9, 1821, in the Geranium Valley, now known as the Valley of the Tomb. In 1840, he was exhumed by order of French King Louis-Phillippe , and Bonaparte’s remains were transferred back to mainland France, arriving on December 15 .

Napoleon’s tomb is located in Paris in the Dôme des Invalides . Originally a royal chapel built between 1677 and 1706, the Invalides were turned into a military pantheon under Napoleon’s reign. In addition to Napoleon Bonaparte, several other French notables are buried there, including: Napoleon II, the King of Rome and Napoleon’s son; Napoleon’s brothers Joseph and Jérôme Bonaparte; Generals Henri-Gratien Bertrand and Géraud-Christophe-Michel Duroc; and the French Marshals Ferdinand Foch and Hubert Lyautey.

Not surprising given his place in world history, Napoleon has appeared on the big screen many times with depictions ranging from purposefully humorous to based in realism.

Marlon Brando and Dennis Hopper were cast as Bonaparte in the 1950s movies Désirée (1954) and The Story of Mankind (1957), respectively. The general also appears in films such as Waterloo (1970), Time Bandits (1981), and The Count of Monte Cristo (2002).

In terms of more fantastical portrayals, Napoleon is a character in the 1989 cult comedy Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure, in which the title characters played by Alex Winter and Keanu Reeves decide to abduct historical figures for their high school project through the use of time travel. He also appears as an antagonist in the 2009 sequel Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian .

In 2023, director Ridley Scott helmed a new biopic simply titled Napoleon that released in theaters on November 22. The movie stars Joaquin Phoenix as the French emperor and Vanessa Kirby as Josephine and focuses heavily on their tumultuous relationship. Napoleon marked a reunion for Phoenix and Scott, who worked on the 2000 classic Gladiator also starring Russell Crowe .

• I am never angry when contradicted; I seek to be enlightened.
• I wish my ashes to rest on the banks of the Seine, in the midst of that French people which I have loved so much. I die before my time, killed by the English oligarchy and its hired assassins.
• A revolution is an idea which has found its bayonets.
• A great people may be killed, but they will not be intimidated.
• He who fears being conquered is certain of defeat.
• Love does more harm than good.
• A man is not dependent upon his fellow creature, when he does not fear death.
• It is the cause, and not the death that makes the martyr.
• Even when I am gone, I shall remain in people’s minds the star of their rights, my name will be the war cry of their efforts, the motto of their hopes.
• Men of genius are meteors, intended to burn to light their century.
• Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever.
• In choosing a wife, a man does not renounce his mother, and still less is he justified with breaking her heart.

Fact Check: We strive for accuracy and fairness. If you see something that doesn’t look right, contact us !

The Biography.com staff is a team of people-obsessed and news-hungry editors with decades of collective experience. We have worked as daily newspaper reporters, major national magazine editors, and as editors-in-chief of regional media publications. Among our ranks are book authors and award-winning journalists. Our staff also works with freelance writers, researchers, and other contributors to produce the smart, compelling profiles and articles you see on our site. To meet the team, visit our About Us page: https://www.biography.com/about/a43602329/about-us

Tyler Piccotti first joined the Biography.com staff as an Associate News Editor in February 2023, and before that worked almost eight years as a newspaper reporter and copy editor. He is a graduate of Syracuse University. When he's not writing and researching his next story, you can find him at the nearest amusement park, catching the latest movie, or cheering on his favorite sports teams.

Queen Elizabeth II

Marcus Aurelius

Pontius Pilate

Maria Theresa

Alexander the Great

Nicholas II

Kaiser Wilhelm

Kublai Khan

William the Conqueror

Advertisement

Supported by

‘Napoleon: A Life,’ by Andrew Roberts

• Share full article

By Duncan Kelly

• Nov. 13, 2014

On July 22, 1789, a week after the storming of the Bastille in Paris, Napoleon Bonaparte wrote to his older brother, Joseph, that there was nothing much to worry about. “Calm will return. In a month.” His timing was off, but perhaps he took the misjudgment to heart because he spent the rest of his life trying to bring glory and order to France by building a new sort of empire. By the time he was crowned emperor on Dec. 2, 1804, he could say, “I am the Revolution.” It was, according to the historian Andrew Roberts’s epically scaled new biography, “Napoleon: A Life,” both the ultimate triumph of the self-made man, an outsider from Corsica who rose to the apex of French political life, and simultaneously a “defining moment of the Enlightenment,” fixing the “best” of the French Revolution through his legal, educational and administrative reforms. Such broad contours get at what Napoleon meant by saying to his literary hero Goethe at a meeting in Erfurt, “Politics is fate.”

Napoleon didn’t mean fatalism by this, rather that political action is unavoidable if you want personal and national glory. It requires a mastery of fortune, and a willingness to be ruthless when necessary. If this sounds Machiavellian, that’s because it is — Machiavelli’s arguments about politics informed Napoleon’s self-consciousness, whether in appraising fortune as a woman or a river to be tamed and harnessed, or assuming that in politics it is better to be feared than loved. Such views went hand in hand with the grand visions of politics outlined in the ancient histories and biographies Napoleon revered as a young man. “Bloodletting is among the ingredients of political medicine” was Napoleon’s cool if brutal reminder of an ever-present item on his exhausting schedule.

His strategy always included dashing off thousands of letters and plans, in a personal regime calling for little sleep, much haste and a penchant for being read to while taking baths so as not to waste even a minute. He compartmentalized ruthlessly, changing tack between lobbying for more shoes and brandy for the army at one minute, to directing the personal lives of his siblings or writing love letters to the notorious Josephine at another; here ensuring extravagant financial “contributions” from those whom he had vanquished, there discussing the booty to send back to Paris, particularly from the extraordinary expedition in Egypt where his “ savants had missed nothing.” The personal and the political ran alongside each other in his mind.

Yet when his longtime collaborator but fair-weather political friend, the diplomat Charles-Maurice de Talleyrand, suggested that Napoleon try to make those he conquered learn to love France, Napoleon replied that this was an irrelevance. “ Aimer : I don’t really know what this means when applied to politics,” he said. Still, if grand strategy and national interest lay behind foreign affairs, there were nevertheless personal rules of conduct to uphold. Talleyrand was a party to Napoleon’s strategy since supporting his coup d’état against the French Directory in 1799. That was O.K. And by short-selling securities he made millions for himself. But he was called out by Napoleon and dismissed as vice grand elector when found facing both ways politically at a crucial moment.

Napoleon understood those temptations because he was also flexible enough to tilt toward the winning side, regularly supporting any form of local religion that could help him militarily. Nonetheless, Roberts’s Napoleon is a soldier, statesman and “bona fide intellectual,” who rode his luck for longer than most intellectuals in politics ever do.

Testing himself against fate seems to have been his mantra. A relative outsider to the French elite, he forced his way up its ranks through ferocious hard work, making the best of his natural talents, particularly in mathematics and artillery. He was among the few selected for the prestigious École Militaire in Paris, and there he grasped every opportunity. He was a severe young man with little small talk. “His favorite entertainments were intellectual rather than social,” though he eventually cultivated a happy marriage with Josephine, only later to annul it for strategic reasons.

Having arrived early at the view that political life needed to be determined by an all-powerful state, he was delighted when first appointed to a part of it in the Historical and Topographical Bureau of the War Ministry, which was described as “the most sophisticated planning organization of its day.” But before gaining state power for himself, Napoleon first had to suppress the many enemies of revolutionary France, particularly Austria and what one observer called the “geopolitical expression” known as Italy.

Roberts brilliantly conveys the sheer energy and presence of Napoleon the organizational and military whirlwind who, through crisp and incessant questioning, sized up people and problems and got things done. His rapport with soldiers was unparalleled, and his ability to cultivate a stable image of authority while taking advantage of shifting situations made him not only an astonishing soldier but a terrific statesman as well. He was as comfortable in dramatic nine-hour diplomatic encounters with Prince Metternich of Austria at the Marcolini Palace, or on a raft with Czar Alexander in the middle of the Neman River discussing the reorganization of Europe, as he was slicing through enemy lines. His dynamism shines in Roberts’s set-piece chapters on major battles like Austerlitz, Jena and Marengo, turning visionary military maneuvers into politically potent moments that could bolster the four pillars of his rule at home — low taxes, property rights, centralized authority and national glory.

When his political antennas ultimately deserted him, it proved fatal. He attempted to impose, through the “continental system,” a blockade on English goods to damage an enemy he could not beat at sea, which led him toward a form of imperial overreach that backfired. England built continual coalitions against France, and eventually Napoleon fell into a coalition trap as messy as the bogs and marshes that slowed him up on his ill-fated Russian campaign. Napoleon was outthought and outmaneuvered as Moscow burned. Meanwhile, typhus wiped out nearly a fifth of his men. He was a master tactician of relatively localized battlefields, but one of his generals put his finger on Napoleon’s Russian problem. Here was “a man annihilated by the presence of space.”

In the retreat his enemies struck hard, but even then his engineers were able to pioneer an astonishing escape, erecting flexible bridges across the freezing Berezina River, hidden from the advancing Russian Army. Even this, however, couldn’t thwart the inevitable, and Napoleon tasted defeat in Leipzig. Simultaneously, Wellington entered France. The devious Talleyrand supported the restoration of the Bourbon monarchy, and Napoleon was forced into exile on Elba. Though he soon retook Paris in another coup, his ultimate defeat at Waterloo was, as Roberts implies, tragic because it was so odd, the result of some elementary mistakes. During his second exile, on Saint Helena, he died of stomach cancer in 1821, at the age of 51, finally falling victim to a fate not even he could master.

By Andrew Roberts

Illustrated. 926 pp. Viking. $45.

Duncan Kelly teaches political thought at the University of Cambridge.

Explore More in Books

Want to know about the best books to read and the latest news start here..

What can fiction tell us about the apocalypse? The writer Ayana Mathis finds unexpected hope in novels of crisis by Ling Ma, Jenny Offill and Jesmyn Ward .

At 28, the poet Tayi Tibble has been hailed as the funny, fresh and immensely skilled voice of a generation in Māori writing .

Amid a surge in book bans, the most challenged books in the United States in 2023 continued to focus on the experiences of L.G.B.T.Q. people or explore themes of race.

Stephen King, who has dominated horror fiction for decades , published his first novel, “Carrie,” in 1974. Margaret Atwood explains the book’s enduring appeal .

Do you want to be a better reader?   Here’s some helpful advice to show you how to get the most out of your literary endeavor .

Each week, top authors and critics join the Book Review’s podcast to talk about the latest news in the literary world. Listen here .

• Biographies & Memoirs

Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime Try Prime and start saving today with fast, free delivery

Amazon Prime includes:

Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.

• Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
• Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
• Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
• A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
• Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
• Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access

Important:  Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.

Buy new: $21.49 $21.49 FREE delivery: Wednesday, April 24 on orders over $35.00 shipped by Amazon. Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com

Return this item for free.

Free returns are available for the shipping address you chose. You can return the item for any reason in new and unused condition: no shipping charges

• Go to your orders and start the return
• Select the return method

Buy used: $18.37

Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA) is a service we offer sellers that lets them store their products in Amazon's fulfillment centers, and we directly pack, ship, and provide customer service for these products. Something we hope you'll especially enjoy: FBA items qualify for FREE Shipping and Amazon Prime.

If you're a seller, Fulfillment by Amazon can help you grow your business. Learn more about the program.

Other Sellers on Amazon

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required .

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

Image Unavailable

• To view this video download Flash Player

Follow the author

Napoleon: A Life Paperback – Illustrated, October 20, 2015

Purchase options and add-ons

• Print length 976 pages
• Language English
• Publisher Penguin Books
• Publication date October 20, 2015
• Reading age 18 years and up
• Dimensions 2.3 x 6 x 8.9 inches
• ISBN-10 9780143127857
• ISBN-13 978-0143127857
• See all details

Frequently bought together

Similar items that may ship from close to you

Editorial Reviews

About the author, product details.

• ASIN ‏ : ‎ 0143127853
• Publisher ‏ : ‎ Penguin Books; Reprint edition (October 20, 2015)
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• Paperback ‏ : ‎ 976 pages
• ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 9780143127857
• ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0143127857
• Reading age ‏ : ‎ 18 years and up
• Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 2.31 pounds
• Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 2.3 x 6 x 8.9 inches
• #3 in French History (Books)
• #4 in Historical France Biographies
• #52 in Military Leader Biographies

Videos for this product

Click to play video

This book is dope🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

Rashad Bates

A surprisingly beautiful paperback

serene tami

About the author

Andrew roberts.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Customer reviews

Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.

To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.

Reviews with images

• Sort reviews by Top reviews Most recent Top reviews

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. please try again later..

Top reviews from other countries

• Amazon Newsletter
• About Amazon
• Accessibility
• Sustainability
• Press Center
• Investor Relations
• Amazon Devices
• Amazon Science
• Sell on Amazon
• Sell apps on Amazon
• Supply to Amazon
• Protect & Build Your Brand
• Become an Affiliate
• Become a Delivery Driver
• Start a Package Delivery Business
• Advertise Your Products
• Self-Publish with Us
• Become an Amazon Hub Partner
• › See More Ways to Make Money
• Amazon Visa
• Amazon Store Card
• Amazon Secured Card
• Amazon Business Card
• Shop with Points
• Credit Card Marketplace
• Reload Your Balance
• Amazon Currency Converter
• Your Account
• Your Orders
• Shipping Rates & Policies
• Amazon Prime
• Returns & Replacements
• Manage Your Content and Devices
• Recalls and Product Safety Alerts
• Conditions of Use
• Privacy Notice
• Consumer Health Data Privacy Disclosure
• Your Ads Privacy Choices

• International edition
• Australia edition
• Europe edition

Napoleon the Great by Andrew Roberts review – a ‘marvellously readable’, if partial, biography

What sort of Napoleon does our generation want? This is a fast-paced account, written from inside the imperial entourage

W ill publishers still be churning out dozens of books a year about Hitler or Stalin two centuries after their deaths? Hitler took the most powerful country in Europe and wrecked it for a generation, demonstrating in the process how not to run acontinent. The one debt we owe Stalin is that he ensured Hitler’s defeat; apart from that, it is hard to think of much he did that could not have been done more effectively and more humanely in other ways. But Napoleon – another case entirely. He took a country in the throes of acute fiscal crisis and social unrest and made it the dominant power in Europe; he oversaw the shattering of the old ruling order across the continent; he reformed the government; and he transformed the very idea of what politics could be and man could do. All of these achievements proved to be irreversible. Those historians who over the past decade or so have had fun denouncing him as the first totalitarian dictator have it all wrong: no angel, to be sure, he ended up doing far more at far less cost than any modern despot.

One proof of this is his immortality. After Hitler’s death, there was mostly an embarrassed silence; after Stalin’s, little but denunciation. But when Napoleon died on St Helena in 1821, much of Europe and the Americas could not help thinking of itself as a post-Napoleonic generation. His presence haunts the pages of Stendhal and Alfred de Vigny. In a striking and prescient phrase, Chateaubriand prophesied the “despotism of his memory”, a despotism of the fantastical that in many ways made Romanticism possible and that continues to this day.

The raw material for the future Napoleon myth was provided by one of his St Helena confidants, the Comte de las Cases, whose account of conversations with the great man came out shortly after his death and ran in repeated editions throughout the century. De las Cases somehow metamorphosed the erstwhile dictator into a herald of liberty, the emperor into a slayer of dynasties rather than the founder of his own. To the “great man” school of history Napoleon was grist to their mill, and his meteoric rise redefined the meaning of heroism in the modern world. The Marxists, for all their dislike of great men, grappled endlessly with the meaning of the 18th Brumaire; indeed one of France’s most eminent Marxist historians, George Lefebvre, wrote what arguably remains the finest of all biographies of him. It was on this already vast Napoleon literature, a rich terrain for the scholar of ideas, that the great Dutch historian Pieter Geyl was lecturing in 1940 when he was arrested and sent to Buchenwald. There he composed what became one of the classics of historiography, a book entitled Napoleon: For and Against , which charted how generations of intellectuals had happily served up one Napoleon after another. Like those poor souls who crowded the lunatic asylums of mid-19th century France convinced that they were Napoleon, generations of historians and novelists simply could not get him out of their head.

The debate runs on today no less intensely than in the past. Indeed, the man and his times are very much in fashion and we are living through something of a new golden age of Napoleonic literature. Andrew Roberts’s marvellously readable and sumptuously illustrated new book is the second of two major studies of his life to appear this year. So what kind of Napoleon does our generation need? The last one tried to pull him down off his pedestal, to emphasise the violence and the love of power that drove him, even to represent him as precursor to the dictators of the 20th century. This rather silly approach has thankfully now largely been abandoned. The title of Roberts’s book indicates the positive attitude that it shares with other current works: Roberts is keen to stress the ruler’s achievements not his crimes; he wants us to like – or at least respect – the man.

There are good reasons to go along with this. After all, although Roberts does not dwell on this point, Napoleon did more than anyone to redefine the meaning of greatness itself – by showing to later generations not only that the individual counted, but more importantly to most of our predecessors, that talent mattered more than birth. Glory depended on achievements not status, and no one worked more tirelessly than Napoleon to have an effect on the world.

Roberts demonstrates this very well. One might describe Napoleon at the start as a hard-working artillery officer, except that it was so much more than just hard work. The graft, the hours spent in meticulous preparation, were always there.

But his embrace of details was allied to an instinctive understanding of the larger picture, great personal courage, historical insight based on his constant reading, and, above all, perhaps, an appreciation of the moral and psychological dimensions of command and government. These qualities emerged first on the battlefield – and Roberts’s account of the engagements at Toulon and Marengo that propelled him to eminence are gripping – but, most unusually, they transferred equally to the realm of government. He chose his advisers well, and eclectically, and he understood that the best treatment for opposition was to absorb it rather than to crush it.

But not everything was hard work and, as Bonaparte was the first to admit, luck too favoured him at crucial moments. Because Roberts is impressive on the battles, he highlights the combination of skill and good fortune that turned the first consul into the emperor. But once we leave the battlefield, we tend to get the somewhat partial view from the court. His treatment of the civil code, for instance, is far more uncritical than it need have been. One could present Napoleon not simply as the great institution-builder he was, but as the man who ensured the French male property-owner would sleep easily at night in coming decades. That women’s rights were drastically curtailed in the new code, for instance, is not something dwelt on here, nor the immense powers it gave the state. Amid the pomp and circumstance that Roberts has such a keen eye for, the figure of Napoleon the hero of the emergent bourgeoisie passes us by. Similarly, the larger impact of Napoleonic administration on law and politics across Europe – the subject of an excellent recent book by Charles Esdaile – gets relatively short shrift.

Perhaps the best way to think of this book is as a view – essentially positive – from inside the imperial entourage. Roberts has been indefatigable in tracking down memorabilia and visiting the sites of battles, palaces and places of exile. This is all richly depicted and woven into a narrative that is told with the aplomb of an accomplished historical storyteller. But underlying structures and more long-term shifts do not seem to attract the author’s interest in the same way. The financing of war is touched on, but the difficulty Napoleon faced in matching France against the fiscal superpower across the Channel is not discussed in any detail. The same can be said for Roberts’s treatment of the complex sources of political support for and opposition to Napoleon – complex in the sense that they cannot be reduced simply to the question of whether or not one was for the ancien regime. Did Napoleon really usher in a new bourgeois order that his nephew would then clamber to power to defend 25 years later? For such questions, it is probably better to read other works. But for a fast-paced and comprehensive narrative, told with affection and sympathy, many readers will want to turn to Napoleon the Great . It is a book that sets out for a new generation exactly why he mattered and will continue to matter so long as people argue about faith, and property, and kings, and the future of Europe.

• Biography books
• History books

More on this story

Napoleon’s letter of surrender and lock of his hair to go on display

Napoleon’s cocked hat raises the roof as emperor’s effects go under the hammer

From Napoleon to the Nazis: the 10 most notorious looted artworks

Book reviews roundup: Napoleon the Great, Funny Girl and Severed: A History of Heads Lost and Found

In These Times: Living in Britain Through Napoleon’s Wars, 1793-1815 by Jenny Uglow – review

Napoleon the Great review – an entertaining and deeply forensic examination

Plot to kill Napoleon linked to British cabinet minister

Comments (…), most viewed.

The 19 Best Books on the Napoleonic Wars

From introductory works to comprehensive volumes

• European History Figures & Events
• Wars & Battles
• The Holocaust
• European Revolutions
• Industry and Agriculture History in Europe
• American History
• African American History
• African History
• Ancient History and Culture
• Asian History
• Latin American History
• Medieval & Renaissance History
• Military History
• The 20th Century
• Women's History
• M.A., Medieval Studies, Sheffield University
• B.A., Medieval Studies, Sheffield University

Our editors independently research, test, and recommend the best products; you can learn more about our review process here . We may receive commissions on purchases made from our chosen links.

From 1805 to 1815 one of history's greatest generals dominated Europe; his name was Napoleon Bonaparte . The wars which bear his name have captivated the world ever since, and there is a large range of literature available; the following is our selection. Due to the interest one profound event in Napoleon's life, we have a completely separate selection of literature dedicated just to the Battle of Waterloo .

The Campaigns of Napoleon by David Chandler

Widely proclaimed as the best single volume work on the Napoleonic Wars, David Chandler's large book is easily the top pick. Maintaining an easy to read style across a detailed examination of the battles, tactics, and events, the book contains a wealth of information. However, I would suggest reading this with a suitable atlas handy (see below), and sheer size may make the book unsuitable for some.

The Napoleonic Wars 1803-1815 by David Gates

This is much shorter than Chandler and a perfect introductory work that will explain the conflict very well. There are downsides, as there’s a late start and you might want other books to explain Napoleon’s military origins… but you’ll hopefully find the subject fascinating and try other books anyway!

The Napoleonic Wars by Fremont Barnes and Fisher

Osprey has combined their four-volume Essential Histories coverage into this one volume, so you get plenty of rich illustration to go with a slimmed down history. I like the way Osprey have catered to people who wouldn’t like Chandler, or even West, and praise them for it. Others will want more depth.

A Military History and Atlas of the Napoleonic Wars by V. J. Esposito

This is a very substantial volume, with a footprint larger than A4 paper, and over an inch in thickness. A solid military narrative of the whole Napoleonic Wars is accompanied by a massive range of detailed maps, showing campaigns, battles and troop movements. The maps may look fairly dull at first sight (using a limited palette), but they really aren't!

Napoleon and His Marshals by A G Macdonell

This classic work covers the leading commanders in Napoleon’s army: the Marshals. They alone are a fascinating and complex subject, full of problematic personalities, and this is a great supplement to a general history.

Britain Against Napoleon: The Organization of Victory, 1793-1815 by Roger Knight

A book about the things people often forget in war: economy, supply, organization. This isn’t a military study of Wellington’s army, but a detailed examination of how Britain managed to stay in the fight for so long, and ultimately be among the victors.

Tactics and the Experience of Battle in the Age of Napoleon by Rory Muir

While many accounts of the Napoleonic Wars concentrate on the tactics and troop movements, this volume extends to an extra dimension - the practical experiences of the troops themselves. Using letters, diaries and other primary sources, Muir explores how soldiers and commanders reacted in the field, implementing their orders in the face of mud, disease and cannon fire. An often vivid read.

1812: Napoleon's Invasion of Russia by Paul Britten Austin

This 1100 page book is actually a collection of three linked volumes: March on Moscow, Napoleon in Moscow, and The Great Retreat, all narrating the story of Napoleon’s invasion of Russia in 1812. There is in-depth descriptions, analysis, and first-hand accounts, and it’s an excellent work.

1812: Napoleon's Fatal March on Moscow by Adam Zamoyski

Zamoyski is a rising star of popular history, and this pacy, exhilarating account is a shorter alternative to the other book on this list about Napoleon’s disaster in Russia in 1812. It can also be had very cheaply, but that’s no reflection on the writing, and don’t feel you have to ‘go long’ with Austin, as this is top class stuff.

The Spanish Ulcer: A History of the Peninsular War by David Gates

The war between Napoleon and his enemy in Spain and Portugal probably gets more coverage than it merits in England, but this is the book to read to bring yourself up to speed. It announced Gates to the public and is a story of political folly and military warnings.

Russia Against Napoleon by Dominic Lieven

There are two books devoted to 1812 on this list, but Lieven covers the subsequent Russian march to Paris and how the Russians played a pivotal role in Napoleon’s defeat. Insightful, witty and detailed, you can see why it’s award-winning.

An Illustrated Encyclopedia of Uniforms of the Napoleonic Wars by Digby Smith

This is a superb all in one starting point for both wargamers who want to paint their units and readers who’d like to imagine what they’ve covered in other books.

Rites of Peace: The Fall of Napoleon and the Congress of Vienna by Adam Zamoyski

You can understand how Zamoyski made 1812 gripping, but you might wonder how he did the same to the Congress of Vienna which followed Napoleon’s defeat. Half social event, half map drawing, the Congress sets up the following century and this is a perfect last volume.

Trafalgar: The Biography of a Battle by Roy Adkins

I can’t really neglect to include a book on the most famous naval battle of the era, and Adkins does strong cinematic work. It’s actually been compared to the great ‘Stalingrad’, which is high praise in these quarters.

Weapons and Equipment of the Napoleonic Wars by Philip J. Haythornthwaite

Muskets? Rifles? This is a guide to all the weapons you’ll come across in other texts, and what impact they had on the battles. Tactics, supplies and most other things are covered in a snappy manner.

How Far From Austerlitz? Napoleon 1805 - 1815 by Alistair Horne

Using a masterfully written quality narrative of the Napoleonic Wars, Horne discusses how Austerlitz may have been Bonaparte's greatest victory, but it also marked a decline in his ​judgment: how far did Napoleon's own hubris contribute to his ultimate defeat?

The Napoleonic Empire by G. J. Ellis

The Napoleonic Wars weren't simply about battles, and this volume presents the many social, cultural and political debates which occupy historians. Consequently, this volume is an excellent way of broadening your knowledge beyond the conflict itself. Issues include 'did Napoleon betray the French Revolutionary ideals?' and just what long-term effect did the Emperor have on France?

Imperial Bayonets by George Nafziger

This is a real favorite of mine: a guide to how units moved, operated and were formed during the wars, by a man who’s long been a favorite of wargamers. Unfortunately, it’s gone out of print since I bought mine and can be very expensive. One for the devoted reader.

War and Peace by Leo Tolstoy

This all-time literary classic is set in Russia during the Napoleonic Wars, mostly in 1812. It’s big but isn’t too hard once you’ve got past the first hundred pages when a lot of names are thrown at you. Tolstoy has been praised for realistic battle scenes (i.e. chaotic) and I believe it’s so enlightening, atmospheric and powerful readers should try it.

• The French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars
• The 12 Best Books on the French Revolution
• The Best Books: The Battle of Waterloo
• 1800s Military History
• Napoleonic Wars: Battle of Ligny
• Napoleonic Wars: Marshal Jean-Baptiste Bernadotte
• Biography of Napoleon Bonaparte, Great Military Commander
• Battle of Borodino During the Napoleonic Wars
• Napoleonic Wars: Marshal Michel Ney
• Napoleonic Wars: Battle of Austerlitz
• Top 14 Best Sharpe Novels by Bernard Cornwell
• Timeline from 1810 to 1820
• Napoleonic Wars: Battle of Friedland
• Napoleonic Wars: Battle of Waterloo
• Charles Maurice De Talleyrand: Skilled Diplomat or Turncoat?

6 Best Napoleon Books of All Time

Our goal : Find the best Napoleon books according to the internet (not just one random person's opinion).

• Type "best napoleon books" into our search engine and study the top 5+ pages.
• Add only the books mentioned 2+ times.
• Rank the results neatly for you here! 😊 (It was a lot of work. But hey! That's why we're here, right?)

(Updated 2024)

As an Amazon Associate, we earn money from purchases made through links in this page.

Last Updated: Monday 1 Jan, 2024

• Best Napoleon Books

Andrew Roberts

The Campaigns of Napoleon

David G. Chandler

A Biography

Duff Cooper

Rites of Peace

The fall of napoleon and the congress of vienna.

Adam Zamoyski

The Path to Power

Philip Dwyer

With Eagles to Glory

Napoleon and his german allies in the 1809 campaign.

John H Gill

• ‘Napoleon: A Life,’ by Andrew Roberts - The New York Times www.nytimes.com
• Napoleon Bonaparte and the Napoleonic Wars, by the Books explorethearchive.com
• The Best Books About Napoleon Bonaparte And The Napoleonic Wars - Book Scrolling www.bookscrolling.com
• The Best Books on Napoleon - Five Books Expert Recommendations fivebooks.com
• Top Ten Books on Napoleon Bonaparte - DailyHistory.org dailyhistory.org

What are some of the most insightful posts about Napoleon on your site?

Our website features several posts that explore the intricate details of Napoleon's life and legacy. You can read comprehensive reviews and discussions that delve into various aspects of his military campaigns, political strategies, and impact on Europe. Each post is curated to provide a rich understanding of this monumental historical figure.

When looking for publications on Napoleon, how often does your site update with new recommendations?

We consistently update our lists of recommended reads to ensure readers have access to the most recently published works on Napoleon. New titles are added frequently—often immediately after they're published—to provide the freshest and most accurate information available. Keep an eye out for our latest updates in the Napoleon category; for example, new additions are featured during peak times such as February (Feb), August (Aug), September (Sept), and December (Dec).

Could you suggest a comprehensive history book that covers Napoleon's impact on military strategies?

Certainly! Among the many history books we link to, there's a particular title that stands out for its in-depth analysis of Napoleon's revolutionary approach to war and army tactics. This book is noted by an esteemed author who delves into how Napoleon redefined military strategies and his lasting influence on European conflicts. It's a great read for anyone interested in the subject.

I am fascinated with the Napoleonic era. Which title would you say covers the breadth of this period?

If you're drawn to the Napoleonic era, we have several recommendations that cover this dynamic period in great detail. Look for a title that spans the entirety of Napoleon's reign and delves into the cultural, political, and economic shifts that occurred in France and throughout Europe. The greatest reflections of the era are usually found in works that meticulously chronicle these transformative years.

How many times is the French perspective on Napoleon’s campaigns represented in the books you recommend?

In our recommended selections, you'll find books that provide a French viewpoint on Napoleon's campaigns. These works read about French society during Napoleon's ascent to power, offer analyses on his legislative reforms within France, and describe his complex relationship with the French people. It's captivating to explore how France itself was shaped through the prism of war and political change.

Are there any books that focus on Napoleon's Russian campaign that are well-reviewed?

Yes, you'll find several well-reviewed titles that focus on Napoleon's ill-fated Russian campaign. These books often recount the tragic march of the French army into Russia, detailing the immense struggles against harsh climate and the determined Russian resistance. They combine an intriguing mix of military history and human drama, providing a compelling read.

Can you recommend a title that explores the rivalry between Napoleon and the British?

Our site features a title by a renowned author that vividly recounts the storied rivalry between Napoleon and the British Empire. The book underscores some of the greatest military and political battles of the time, offering unique insights into the strategies employed by the British to counter Napoleon's ambitions. It's an engrossing read for anyone interested in this aspect of European history.

What To Read Next

Explore other lists

Share this page

Email us if you have any feedback

• Search for:
• World History Course
• Framed Historical Prints
• Military History
• World War 1
• Australians in the Mediterranean, WW2
• Political and Economic History
• Colonialism
• Social and Cultural History
• History Quizzes
• Organisations and Resources Directory
• Historical Maps, Prints, Photographs and Books
• History Guild Volunteers
• History Guild Writers
• Copyright Info
• Privacy and Refund Policy

Select Page

Brilliant and Flawed: The Enduring Legacy of Napoleon Bonaparte

May 4, 2021

Estimated reading time: 6 minutes

The 200th anniversary of his death (1821-2021) renews discussion on how the former Emperor should be commemorated.

By Michael Vecchio

Military genius. Autocratic despot. Progressive visionary. Bloodthirsty war monger. The contrasting list of terms to describe the legacy of Napoleon Bonaparte indicate just how polarizing of a figure the former French Emperor was not only during his lifetime, but continuously into the modern era.

Now two centuries after his death on the island of Saint Helena on May 5, 1821, the utterance of the name Napoleon still brings up fervent discussion amongst historians and the public as to how this diminutive Corsican should be commemorated; yet whether one is for or against him the one word that would be on the list of both sides of the argument is surely, unforgettable.

In reality it is indeed possible to label certain historical individuals a hero and a villain, as contradictory as it may seem. The life of Napoleon Bonaparte is but one of the best examples of this; simultaneously uniting, inspiring, and building his nation in an age of constant war, the youthful brilliance and ambition of Napoleon would only be masked by a growing addiction to power and a seemingly endless quest for foreign dominance.

Born to Italian parents on the French controlled island of Corsica in 1769, Napoleon’s early life was a showcase of a budding prodigy; his rapid ascent in the French military entrenched his unmatched ambition making him one of Europe’s leading generals by his late twenties. Dashing, charming, motivated, and brilliant, the presence of Napoleon became a true representation of the future of France. Taking advantage of the unstable situation after its sanguineous Revolution, the young general had an ambitious agenda for himself and the country.

Though he would be subsequently criticized for betraying the principles of the Revolution, in effect becoming the undisputed Emperor of the French, Napoleon aimed to transform the nation through a new style of leadership and progressive vision.

While seemingly unchecked in his position of power, Emperor Napoleon incarnated the notion of an “Enlightened despot” establishing numerous liberal reforms throughout the French Empire . Amongst these actions included a road and sewer system, greater access to higher education, the famed Napoleonic Code of French Civil Law (still in place today, though with amendments), the creation of the Banque de France , the adoption of the metric system, the re-chartering of the Académie Francaise and the formation of the Legion D’honneur order of merit , amongst others.

He encouraged the flourishing of arts and science, religious tolerance, and secular education; and yet to achieve and promote these goals and solidify himself as ruler outside of France’s borders, Napoleon’s realm would find itself in continued conflict with much of Europe’s other powers. Whether it was the British, the Prussians, the Austrians, the Spanish, or the Russians, the list of France’s foes grew with every year of Napoleon’s rule.

Initially vastly successful with Napoleon’s military innovations (mobile artillery and such strategies like the Manoeuvre de Derriere), opponents eventually caught on to his style of warfare, and many adopted similar techniques against him. These series of conflicts which spanned his entire reign would be known as the Napoleonic Wars , and saw victories and defeats for the already controversial Emperor.

Though the quality of life had certainly improved for many in France itself, the cost of war and conquest marred Napoleon’s reputation; death, debt, and humiliation had reduced the glory of France and whatever progress his reforms initiated, while citizens of occupied countries had little access to the rights of the French.

After a failed invasion of Russia in the summer of 1812 , a coalition of Russian, Prussian and Austrian forces defeated Napoleon forcing his abdication and exile to the Mediterranean island of Elba in 1814.

It would be a brief departure, for the seemingly vanquished Emperor who had an amazing ability to rouse the emotions of his countrymen, escaped his exile and returned to Paris for a period now known as the Hundred Days, taking back control of the country he had ruled for a over decade.

Thus came the decisive Battle of Waterloo in June of 1815 , where again the once mighty Napoleon was defeated, vanquished, and exiled for good. This time however his isolation would be on Saint Helena, a remote British island in the South Atlantic.

Upon his death in 1821 , the 52-year-old Napoleon was immediately glorified, lauded, and of course vilified. 200 years later, his legacy remains as complex as ever ; France and Europe were forever transformed by the Napoleonic era, and no single leader had a greater impact on the continent in the 19 th century. While names like Garibaldi and Bismarck too would shape their nations, no man was so intrinsically tied to the destiny of his country for better or worse like Napoleon Bonaparte.

As historian David A. Bell notes in his book, Napoleon: A Concise Biography, “ In France, the laws, and institutions he created still largely stand; much of central Paris still bears his mark, from the additions to the Louvre to the Arc de Triomphe. Film, television and literature have returned to him in regular intervals.” Still he remains a flawed, yet eternally fascinating figure of world history, who is embedded in popular culture and forever etched an image of the romantic and visionary leader. Bell concludes that;

“ Napoleon may have been, from many points of view, a criminal, but he was not a criminal on the scale of the twentieth century dictators, who made mass murder and terror the basis of their social and political systems.” David A. Bell.

For all of Napoleon’s errors and crimes, his life was also an embodiment of human ambition, possibility, and genius. And so while we may recoil in horror at parts of a legacy of war and conquest, we also stand back in awe at a visionary man that left an indelible imprint on the world, unlikely to be replicated.  

Tell me about New Quizzes and Articles

Get your weekly fill of History Articles and Quizzes

We won't share your contact details with anyone.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Related Posts

Imperial Overconfidence: The Anglo-Zulu War

July 8, 2021

Unsung Heroes: Women’s Role in the Agricultural Revolution

November 15, 2023

Virginia Hall, SOE Agent to CIA Pioneer

March 25, 2024

The Roman dead: new techniques are revealing just how diverse Roman Britain was

January 30, 2023

Leave a reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

 Yes please, send me the Newsletter.

Screen Rant

Ridley scott's $220m napoleon letdown is secretly good for a spielberg project in the works for 56 years.

Ridley Scott's Napoleon was a commercial and critical disappointment, yet has paved the way for a Spielberg project to succeed.

• The failure of Ridley Scott's Napoleon movie creates an opportunity for Spielberg's TV series to succeed by telling the story in a more comprehensive and detailed manner.
• Spielberg's upcoming Napoleon HBO series can correct the narrative shortcomings of Scott's film by exploring crucial elements like Napoleon's ability to connect with the French people and his military genius.
• The underperformance of Scott's Napoleon movie serves as a warning for Spielberg's series to fully develop Napoleon's character, motivations, and relevance to engage modern audiences effectively.

Ridley Scott's Napoleon underperformed at the box office and underwhelmed critics, yet the movie's disappointing return could be a blessing for a long-awaited Steven Spielberg project. Despite an impressive cast led by Joaquin Phoenix and vivid period detail that transported the audience to 18th-century France, Napoleon was criticized for its overly simplified story and characterization. Though its financial failure might be off-putting to other filmmakers interested in studying the subject, these failings create an opportunity for other projects to succeed.

Written by Scott's All The Money In The World collaborator David Scarpa, Napoleon encompasses a huge swathe of Bonaparte's life, from the onset of the French Revolution to his death on St Helena in 1821. The movie documents the protagonist's rise to prominence within French politics , weaving his public ascent with his tempestuous private relationship with Joséphine (played by Vanessa Kirby) . Despite this ambitious scope, the movie made just $220 million against a reported $200 million budget and received mixed reviews. Nevertheless, the movie's reception simultaneously proved the danger of making a Napoleon movie and highlighted where future projects can succeed.

Spielberg's HBO Series Is The Best Way To Tell Napoleon's Story

An ambitious attempt to bring Stanley Kubrick's abandoned biopic to life, Steven Spielberg's upcoming Napoleon HBO series is the perfect way to build on Ridley Scott's movie's successes and correct its failures. Reportedly in development for the past eight years, the show will use Kubrick's extensive research – originally intended for his own movie – and expand it into a seven-part series on the French emperor's life . Although it's unclear what period the show will focus on, or whether or not it will take a similar, sweeping approach as Scott's movie, the fact that it's in the works at all promises to fix a flaw with all prospective Napoleon films.

As proven time and time again, by movies ranging from Ridley Scott's Napoleon to Abel Gance's near-100-year-old classic, any film is insufficient to fully explore and explain the life of one of history's greatest characters. Gance's movie, for instance, was over five hours long and yet could only chronicle the period before Bonaparte became emperor, proving that no runtime is sufficient to do the story justice . However, by turning Kubrick's Napoleon film into a TV series, Spielberg is finally presenting the emperor's biography in the only feasible format.

Napoleon Ending Explained

So complex was Napoleon's life, ranging from a hard upbringing in Corsica; to his survival in post-Revolutionary France; to his eventual conquest over much of Europe, that his story is impossible to condense into a single movie. As Scott's film proved, any attempt to cram too much history into a feature running time leads to an overlong and stuffed final product, with no room for character development and progression. With a TV series, Spielberg can finally address this issue that has plagued all Napoleon movies , hopefully allowing the incredible true story to flourish.

Spielberg's Napoleon Will Redeem TWO Failed Projects

Spielberg's seven-part HBO series clearly has the opportunity to fix Ridley Scott's version of Napoleon's story . With an extended runtime, the show can better explain how Napoleon was able to harness popular sentiment to his advantage and secure his standing with the French people – crucial elements missing from Napoleon . The show can also better explore Bonaparte's undeniable military genius , exploring why his tactics were so groundbreaking and why he was so difficult to stop. Fixing these two narrative failings will go a long way towards fully coloring the sketch provided by the 2023 movie.

Beyond just fixing Scott's film, however, Spielberg's Napoleon project will also redeem Stanley Kubrick's lost dream of a comprehensive Napoleon drama. A labor of love for the legendary American director, Kubrick's Napoleon was abandoned following the failure of the 1970 Waterloo movie , whose performance convinced Kubrick that there wasn't an appetite for a Napoleon story. Nevertheless, his obsession with the story and long-running attempt to have his vision realized presents HBO's series with the rare opportunity to answer one of the great " what-ifs " of cinema.

HBO's Napoleon Series Will Prove Where Ridley Scott's Movie Went Wrong

An unfortunate consequence of Spielberg's Napoleon series is that it will further highlight Ridley Scott's film's shortcomings. Although it's impossible to say how the show might tell its story, the very fact that it will unfold over seven episodes immediately gives it a flexibility that Napoleon never had. Characters will be given time to fully develop and Bonaparte's psychology can be fully explored without simplifying his personality or abilities as a leader. Furthermore, the show will be able to address issues like Napoleon 's rushed Egyptian and Russian campaigns , either by ignoring them altogether or delving into them with necessary depth.

Napoleon Movie True Story - Real Life History & Wars Behind Ridley Scott's Epic

Whatever approach Spielberg's Napoleon show takes, its increased runtime provides the opportunity to fully bring its protagonist's world and mindset to life in a way that Napoleon was always going to find impossible. The history of cinema proves that no movie can successfully tell Napoleon's story in one sitting . By virtue of its format, the upcoming HBO series has a much greater chance of success – providing a sharp contrast with Scott's movie in the process.

Ridley Scott's Napoleon Failure Is A Warning For Spielberg's Series

The relationship between Ridley Scott's Napoleon and Spielberg's Stanley Kubrick adaptation is not exclusively one-way. Just as Spielberg's show can highlight flaws within the 2023 film, Napoleon also provides a template for Spielberg to follow and potentially avoid. For instance, the movie proved that Napoleon's character is so complex that failing to fully explore his motivations and personality can cause the whole movie to stumble. A major factor in Napoleon 's failure was its inability to explain why Bonaparte achieved all that he did. This is a mistake the HBO series cannot repeat.

Likewise, Napoleon 's disappointing finances also indicate that there may be truth to Kubrick's original thesis that audiences simply aren't that interested in Bonaparte's story. As a TV show, Spielberg's Napoleon story will not be under the same pressure. However, it is clear that it must make Napoleon's relevance to a modern audience central if it is to prove more resonant than previous projects on the subject. Napoleon 's failure give Spielberg the chance to right some wrongs. However, it also means that the pressure to succeed will be even greater than ever.

• Today's news
• Reviews and deals
• Climate change
• 2024 election
• Fall allergies
• Health news
• Mental health
• Sexual health
• Family health
• So mini ways
• Unapologetically
• Buying guides

Entertainment

• How to Watch
• My watchlist
• Stock market
• Biden economy
• Personal finance
• Stocks: most active
• Stocks: gainers
• Stocks: losers
• Trending tickers
• World indices
• US Treasury bonds
• Top mutual funds
• Highest open interest
• Highest implied volatility
• Currency converter
• Basic materials
• Communication services
• Consumer cyclical
• Consumer defensive
• Financial services
• Industrials
• Real estate
• Mutual funds
• Credit cards
• Credit card rates
• Balance transfer credit cards
• Business credit cards
• Cash back credit cards
• Rewards credit cards
• Travel credit cards
• Checking accounts
• Online checking accounts
• High-yield savings accounts
• Money market accounts
• Personal loans
• Student loans
• Car insurance
• Home buying
• Options pit
• Investment ideas
• Research reports
• Fantasy football
• Pro Pick 'Em
• College Pick 'Em
• Fantasy baseball
• Fantasy hockey
• Fantasy basketball
• Download the app
• Daily fantasy
• Scores and schedules
• GameChannel
• World Baseball Classic
• Premier League
• CONCACAF League
• Champions League
• Motorsports
• Horse racing
• Newsletters

New on Yahoo

• Privacy Dashboard

What are the Olympic venues at Paris 2024?

STORY: From Versailles to river Seine, the world's best athletes will have the chance to compete in some of the most iconic and historical locations throughout France and Tahiti during the 2024 Summer Olympics.

Paris will have 15 competition venues and host 21 of the 32 Olympic sports.

Let's take a closer look at what they will look like.

On the river Seine, thousands of athletes will parade in boats for the opening ceremony on July 26.

The Seine will also play host to swimmers during triathlon and open water swimming events.

It's the first time the river has been deemed safe to swim in since Paris last hosted the Games 100 years ago, in 1924.

Across the river, the Grand Palais has been renovated to accommodate the fencing and taekwondo events.

Beach volleyball competitions will be held on the Champ de Mars, the world-famous garden at the foot of the Eiffel Tower.

The Place de la Concorde will host the more urban events, including freestyle BMX, skateboarding and breakdancing.

For archery, cycling and athletics events, spectators will head to the Hotel des Invalides, which houses museums as well as the tomb of Napoleon Bonaparte.

Outside of Paris, equestrian events will take place in the famous Versailles gardens.

Sailing events will be held in a brand-new nautical center in southern city of Marseille.

And in a nod to France's overseas territories, surfing events will take place in Teahupoʻo, a village on the coast of Tahiti, an island in French Polynesia.

The Olympics will bring together 10,500 Olympic athletes from 206 countries, while just weeks later Paris will play host to 4,400 Paralympic athletes.

Events will be watched by more than 13 million spectators and four billion television viewers across the world, totaling 100,000 hours of TV broadcasting.

Recommended Stories

Paris 2024: the games to reignite the olympics.

It has been eight years since a "normal," non-COVID Olympic Games. Paris 2024 is, in a sense, the palate-cleansing Games.

Mortgage rates today, April 18, 2024: Rates will stay high until inflation drops

These are today's mortgage rates. Until inflation reaches the Fed's target rate of 2%, expect rates to remain fairly high. Lock in your rate today.

The real estate sector’s unique view of 2024 — and what’s to come

The S&P 500 is still up on the year — but the real estate sector is lagging far behind the broader index. The differences between sector and market don't stop there: the two have broadly different ideas of what the Fed will do.

Google fired 28 workers who protested Israeli government cloud contract

Google has fired 28 employees involved in protests against the company's "Project Nimbus" cloud contract with the Israeli government.

High rates haven't always been a problem for stocks

Research from BMO Capital Markets shows stocks have actually performed better under higher interest rate regimes over the past three decades.

Supergiant shows off Hades II's gameplay and new god designs

Supergiant Games just treated Hades fans to an extensive look at the game's upcoming sequel.

Caitlin Clark has captivated America, but is she good enough to make the USA Olympic team?

While Clark continues to bring unprecedented attention to women's basketball, she's far from a lock to make the Olympic team as it's a rarity for WNBA rookies to do so.

Report: Justice Department to pay $100 million to victims of Larry Nassar over FBI’s failures

The FBI didn’t arrest Larry Nassar for nearly 14 months after they were first approached by Team USA gymnasts about his abuse.

J.K. Dobbins becomes 2nd former Ravens RB to reunite with OC Greg Roman on Chargers

The Chargers have now signed four offensive players who worked under Roman in Baltimore.

'Feminine and beautiful': This No. 1 bestselling sundress has dropped to $34 — that's nearly 45% off

The forgiving wrap style makes it a winner for 7,000 five-star reviewers: 'Light and flirty, but also very flattering and conservative.'

Caitlin Clark, Angel Reese and Cameron Brink emerged as the stars of March Madness. As they enter the WNBA, why aren’t they paid more?

Caitlin Clark's contract sparked conversation online about low wages for WNBA players.

This $15 Bluetooth transmitter almost makes my husband's '99 Toyota Camry feel like it's from the 21st century

It streams music, takes calls and more — and it's become a road trip must-have.

The best wrist braces for carpal tunnel of 2024, according to hand specialist and health experts

Say goodbye to carpal tunnel flare-ups with these expert and tester-approved carpal tunnel braces

Olivia Munn is going through medically induced menopause after breast cancer treatment. Here's what that means.

Medication to keep the actress's cancer from recurring has put her temporarily in menopause.

Nike, Team USA athletes defend controversial Olympic track & field outfits

After a photo of a women's track & field bodysuit drew heavy criticism, Nike and its athletes are providing context.

Salmonella infections linked to organic basil sold at Trader Joe's are under investigation. What to know about foodborne illnesses.

Everything you need to know about foodborne illnesses like salmonella and listeria.

TikTok is trying to clean up its ‘For You’ recommendations

TikTok is ramping up penalties for creators who post potentially “problematic” content and tightening its rules around what can be recommended in the app.

7 Waymo robotaxis block traffic to San Francisco freeway on-ramp

Seven Waymo robotaxis blocked traffic moving onto the Potrero Avenue 101 on-ramp in San Francisco on Tuesday at 9:30 p.m., according to video of the incident posted to Reddit and confirmation from Waymo. While routing back to Waymo's city depot that evening, the first robotaxi in the lineup came across a road closure with traffic cones. The only other path available to the vehicles was to take the freeway, according to a Waymo spokesperson.

'So much space opened up in my trunk': This $16 organizer gives you way more storage — and it's over 50% off

Say goodbye to car chaos. This handy pouch system gives you space to keep everything in order.

To be a Taylor Swift fan is to be a detective. How 'The Tortured Poets Department' release has Swifties in a frenzy.

Swift's new album is almost here. Swifties are doing major detective work.

• Entertainment

Veteran actor slams Joaquin Phoenix: ‘Truly terrible’

A famous TV actor has slammed Joaquin Phoenix’s “truly terrible” role in one of his recent films, saying it “really is appalling.”

Sydney’s blistering statement: ‘Shameful’

‘Wait his turn’: Costner snubs Hemsworth

Hefty sentence after Alec Baldwin film death

Brian Cox slammed Joaquin Phoenix’s “truly terrible” role in Napoleon and said he could have played the part “a lot better.”

“It’s terrible,” the Succession actor said of the historical drama during a recent live talk, per the Standard . “A truly terrible performance by Joaquin Phoenix. It really is appalling. I don’t know what he was thinking.”

Cox, 77, said he believes Phoenix’s bad performance in Napoleon was not only his fault but also that of director Ridley Scott, who he claimed “helps” the Oscar winner.

“I would have played it a lot better than Joaquin Phoenix, I tell you that. You can say it’s good drama. No — it’s lies,” he added.

Cox then made remarks about Phoenix’s name.

“I think he’s well named. Joaquin … whackeen … wacky,” he said. “It’s a sort of wacky performance.”

Page Six has reached out to Phoenix’s rep for comment but did not immediately hear back.

Napoleon , produced by Apple Original Films and distributed by Sony Pictures, was released in November 2023.

In the war drama, Phoenix, 49, played French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte and it depicted his rise to power and his relationship with his wife, Joséphine Bonaparte, played by Vanessa Kirby.

The film reportedly grossed over $US200 million globally and snagged several Oscar nominations, including best visual effects, best costume design and best production design.

While it’s unclear why Cox slammed the Joker star, that wasn’t the only person he seemed to have an issue with.

Cox also shared his disdain for theatre critics who compared his former role in Succession to his lead performance in the West End production of Long Day’s Journey Into Night.

“It’s stupid! Why make that comparison? It’s so obvious. Most critics are stupid. They really are,” he said.

“Theatre criticism has gone right down the tubes. You think of those wonderful critics of the past, there’s nobody to match them now. Because they don’t do their homework.”

More Coverage

Former President Donald Trump was also named in Cox’s tirade when he revealed that his time in America would end if the politician, 77, was re-elected this upcoming November.

“It’s very hard to govern America and you certainly don’t need idiots like Trump doing that,” he said. “I do think that [President Joe] Biden is a good man but he’s too old.”

This story originally appeared on Page Six and is republished here with permission.

A day after a savage diss from a top female Hollywood producer, actress Sydney Sweeney has returned fire, issuing a brutal dressing down.

The Yellowstone actor brutally rejected Chris Hemsworth for a role in his upcoming movie, declaring, “He’s gonna have to wait his turn.”

A staff member who handled the guns on the set of an Alec Baldwin film where a cinematographer was shot dead has been given the maximum jail time.

Palace In Gaza Where Napoleon Bonaparte Once Camped "Completely Destroyed"

But in a strange twist of fate, some of its greatest historical treasures are safe in a warehouse in Switzerland.

The damage to Gaza's history has also been immense.

Gaza's ancient Greek site of Anthedon has been bombed, its "Napoleon's Palace" destroyed and the only private museum burned down: the war has taken a terrible toll on the rich heritage of the Palestinian territory.

And ironically, it is all thanks to the blockade that made life in the Gaza Strip such a struggle for the past 16 years.

Based on satellite images, the UN cultural organisation reckons some 41 historic sites have been damaged since Israel began pounding the besieged territory after the October 7 Hamas attack.

On the ground, Palestinian archaeologist Fadel al-Otol keeps tabs on the destruction in real time.

When he has electricity and internet access, photos pour into a WhatsApp group he set up with 40 or so young peers he mobilised to watch over the territory's vast array of ancient sites and monuments.

As a teenager in the 1990s, Otol was hired by European archaeological missions before going on to study in Switzerland and at the Louvre Museum in Paris.

"All the archaeological remains in the north have been hit," he told AFP by phone from Gaza.

The human toll since the October 7 Hamas attack has been chilling.

A total of 1,170 people were killed in the unprecedented raid on Israel, according to an AFP tally of Israeli official figures.

Almost 34,000 have died in Gaza in unrelenting Israeli retaliation, according to the territory's health ministry.

Napoleon's HQ flattened

"Blakhiya (the ancient Greek city of Anthedon) was directly bombed. There's a huge hole", said Otol.

He said part of the site, near a Hamas barracks where "we hadn't started excavating", was hit.

The 13th-century Al-Basha palace in Gaza City's old town "has been completely destroyed. There was bombing and (then) it was bulldozed.

"It held hundreds of ancient objects and magnificent sarcophagi," Otol added as he shared recent photos of the ruins.

Napoleon is said to have based himself in the ochre stone edifice at the disastrous end of his Egyptian campaign in 1799.

The room where the French emperor supposedly slept was full of Byzantine artefacts.

"Our best finds were displayed in the Basha," Jean-Baptiste Humbert of the French Biblical and Archaeological School in Jerusalem (EBAF) told AFP.

But we know little of their fate, he said. "Did someone remove the objects before blowing the building up?"

Nerves were frayed even further when the director of Israeli Antiquities, Eli Escusido, posted a video on Instagram of Israeli soldiers surrounded by vases and ancient pottery in the EBAF warehouse in Gaza City.

Much of what has been unearthed in digs in Gaza was stored either at the Al-Basha museum or the warehouse.

Palestinians quickly accused the army of pillaging. But EBAF archaeologist Rene Elter said he has seen no evidence of "state looting".

"My colleagues were able to return to the site. The soldiers opened boxes. We don't know if they took anything," he told AFP.

However, he added: "Every day when Fadel (al-Otol) calls me, I'm afraid he'll tell me that one of our colleagues has died or that such and such a site has been destroyed".

Archaeology is a highly political issue in Israel and the Palestinian territories, with discoveries often used to justify the claims of the two warring peoples.

While Israel has an army of archaeologists who have unearthed an impressive number of ancient treasures, Gaza remains relatively untouched by the trowel despite a rich past stretching back thousands of years.

Ancient crossroads

The only sheltered natural harbour between the Sinai and Lebanon, Gaza has been for centuries a crossroads of civilisations.

A pivot point between Africa and Asia and a hub of the incense trade, it was coveted by the Egyptians, Persians, Greeks, Romans and Ottomans.

A key figure in excavating this glorious past over the last few decades has been Jawdat Khoudary, a Gazan construction magnate and collector.

Gaza, with its "seafront real estate", had a property boom in the 1990s after the Oslo peace accords and the creation of the Palestinian Authority.

When building workers dug up the soil, they came across lots and lots of ancient objects. Khoudary amassed a treasure trove of artefacts that he opened up to foreign archaeologists.

Marc-Andre Haldimann, then curator of MAH, Geneva's art and history museum, couldn't believe his eyes when he was invited to have a look around the garden of Khoudary's mansion in 2004.

"We found ourselves in front of 4,000 objects, including an avenue of Byzantine columns," he told AFP.

Quickly an idea took shape to organise a major exhibition to highlight Gaza's past at the MAH, and then to build a museum in the territory itself so that the Palestinians could take ownership of their own heritage.

At the end of 2006, around 260 objects from the Khoudary collection left Gaza for Geneva, with some later going on to be part of another hit show at the Institut du Monde Arabe (IMA) in Paris.

But geopolitics changed along the way. In June 2007, Hamas drove the Palestinian Authority from Gaza. And Israel imposed its blockade.

As a result, the Gazan artefacts could no longer return home and remained stuck in Geneva, while the archaeological museum project fizzled out.

But Khoudary did not give up hope. He built a museum-hotel called Al-Mathaf, museum in Arabic, on the Mediterranean coast north of Gaza City.

But then came the Israeli ground offensive after the Hamas attack on October 7, which began in Gaza's north.

'Anything but a black hole'

"Al-Mathaf remained under Israeli control for months," Khoudary, who fled Gaza for Egypt, told AFP. "As soon as they left, I asked some people to go there to see what state the place was in. I was shocked. Several items were missing and the hall had been set on fire.

His mansion was also destroyed during fierce fighting in the Sheikh Radwan neighbourhood of Gaza City.

"The Israelis flattened the garden with bulldozers... I don't know whether objects were buried (by the bulldozers) or whether the marble columns were broken or looted. I can't find words," he added.

The Israeli military did not comment on specific sites. But it accused Hamas of systematically using civilian structures like cultural heritage sites, government buildings, schools, shelters and hospitals for military purposes.

"Israel maintains its commitments to international law, including by affording the necessary special protections," the army added in a statement.

While part of Khoudary's collection has been lost, the treasures held in Switzerland remain intact, saved by the blockade and the red tape that delayed their return.

"There were 106 crates ready to go" for years, said Beatrice Blandin, the MAH museum's current curator.

Safely far from the war raging in Gaza, "the objects are in good condition", she added. "We restored some of the bronze pieces that were slightly corroded and repacked everything.

"We just had to be sure that the convoy would not be blocked," she told AFP. "We were waiting for that green light."

But with any return impossible for the moment, Blandin said "discussions are under way" for a new Gaza exhibition in Switzerland.

Khoudary is excited by the idea.

"The most important collection of objects on the history of Gaza is in Geneva. If there is a new show, it will allow the whole world to learn about our history," he told AFP from Cairo.

"It's an irony of history," said Haldimann, who is trying to get his friend Fadel al-Otol safely out of Gaza.

Promoted Listen to the latest songs, only on JioSaavn.com

"A new Gaza exhibition would show once again that Gaza... is anything but a black hole."

(This story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Track Budget 2023 and get Latest News Live on NDTV.com.

Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world .

India Elections | Read Latest News on Lok Sabha Elections 2024 Live on NDTV.com . Get Election Schedule , information on candidates, in-depth ground reports and more - #ElectionsWithNDTV

Watch Live News:

Biopics Don’t Need To Always Get the Facts Right

Movie makers have an obligation, but not necessarily to history.

The Big Picture

• Biopics are movies, not documentaries. They exist to entertain, not solely to teach or present historical accuracy. Even with accuracy, a biopic has to tell a story that engages the viewer.
• The limitations of time in a biopic mean that filmmakers have to be selective in what they present. They can choose to present facts and timelines accurately but risk an exceptionally long runtime, or condense events, merge timelines, and take artistic license to create a narrative that captures the spirit of the facts.
• The film Rocketman successfully bridges historical accuracy and storytelling by exploring the inner, emotional life of Elton John. It presents a fairly accurate recreation of his life but does not strictly adhere to chronological events. It emphasizes the feelings behind the events, making it more compelling for the audience.

Biopics are an odd genre, one that runs the gamut from serious Oscar contenders like Lincoln to wacky half-truth efforts, like Weird: The Al Yankovic Story . From the historical accuracy found in She Said to a narrative effort in the vein of Spencer , which took creative liberties to flesh out Princess Diana 's ( Kristen Stewart ) story. But what should a biopic focus on more? It's a topic that has long been debated, ever since Georges Méliès released Jeanne d'Arc/Joan of Arc in 1900, and the release of Ridley Scott 's Napoleon has reopened the topic for debate, especially given how Ridley Scott has been openly dismissive of historical accuracy in regards to the film. There are arguments - well-thought-out arguments, at that - on either side of the debate, but that doesn't answer the question. What should a biopic focus on more? As much as accuracy should be a goal, the truth is that a biopic has to tell a story , even if that narrative trumps history. Here's why.

An epic that details the checkered rise and fall of French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte and his relentless journey to power through the prism of his addictive, volatile relationship with his wife, Josephine.

Biopics Are Not Documentaries

A biopic is a movie, first and foremost . Simplistic statement, or something deeper? A little of each. The strikingly obvious point actually opens up a wider debate: what exactly is a movie? Generally speaking, a movie exists to entertain the viewer, and how that is translated largely depends on the intent of the filmmaker, be it comedy, horror, drama, or some combination thereof. As far as biopics go, then, if we believe a biopic to be a movie, then it exists to entertain, not teach. It's rare that one would ever hear a director say that the intention of the film is to be 100% historically accurate, based solely on facts. Steven Spielberg didn't break his childhood down to minute details for The Fabelmans , he simply wanted to share his story. Sofia Coppola read Elvis and Me , the 1985 memoir by Priscilla Presley , and it inspired Sofia to tell Presley's story in Priscilla . Even James Cameron , so meticulous about the tiniest of details in Titanic , had to present those facts within the story of Rose ( Kate Winslet ) and Jack ( Leonardo DiCaprio ), the ill-fated, fictional lovers on board the ship. Not that movies don't exist that are entirely true to facts. They even have their own genre: documentary .

That's not to say that a film can't portray history accurately, be used to point out society's ills, or even educate. Biopic films like Schindler's List and Selma are powerful, powerful depictions of the Holocaust and the 1965 "Bloody Sunday" march in Selma, Alabama, in order, but use the dramatic element of film to bring the truths to relatable life. In the previously cited article in The Vulture, Napoleon 's Joaquin Phoenix sums it up very nicely: "If you want to really understand Napoleon, then you should probably do your own studying and reading."

What Makes a Good Biopic Movie?

Biopics only have so much time to tell a person's story on screen. Walk the Line condenses 44 years of Johnny Cash 's life into 136 minutes. Gandhi uses just over three hours to tell the tale of Mahatma Gandhi between 1893 and 1948, 55 years in total. Even if you don't buy into the "a biopic is entertainment" argument above, you can't argue that the limits of time have an unavoidable impact on how much can be told in a biopic. Every movie has an ending. Every TV series has a finale (with the exception, apparently, of The Simpsons ). A filmmaker can only fit a limited amount of a person's biography into a feature film . And the people whose lives get turned into biopics, by and large, are people who've led, and/or continue to lead eventful lives. Thus, by its very nature, a biopic has to be selective in what is presented.

The biopic filmmaker, then, has some choices to make. Tell the story of the subject with nothing but historically accurate facts and timelines, while trying to make a film that is still engaging, or play around with facts, events, and timelines to fit in as much about the person as they can. The former would produce a film with an exceptionally long runtime, testing the endurance of the hardiest of moviegoers, while the latter tells the narrative in a shorter runtime, keeping the viewer's interest while staying true to the spirit of the facts. This is why so many biopics tend to merge events, condense timelines, avoid specific details, or take artistic license to dramatize a summation of events.

In an interview with The Times , Ridley Scott references one scene in Napoleon , where Napoleon's cannons fire at the Pyramids in Egypt, which speaks to that very point. Says Scott, "I don't know if he [Napoloeon} did that, but it was a fast way of saying he took Egypt." Historically accurate, just summed up in a single moment. Braveheart eschews facts from the get-go , depicting the Scots wearing kilts in the 13th century, when they weren't worn until the late-16th century, and dramatizes the Battle of Stirling Bridge in a scene completely absent of any bridges, let alone the one it's named for. But visually, you know it takes place in Scotland, and the battle is far more exciting than it arguably was in life, where the Scots waited for English troops to cross the bridge in smaller groups before attacking. By doing so, Mel Gibson eliminated the need for time-wasting exposition and a long, drawn-out action piece light on action. And that's just two examples of the practice. Collider is one of many websites to feature articles about historical accuracies, or the absence of them, on film.

'Rocketman' Nails Both Its Storytelling and Historical Accuracy

Now all that said, a biopic can be both historically accurate and narrative, and one of the most recent films that managed to successfully bridge the two is 2019's Elton John biopic Rocketman . Of the film, director Dexter Fletcher tells Esquire , "There could be a factual, chronological documentary that would tell you absolutely everything about what Elton did, where he was, and when he did it, but the film just absolutely explores his inner, emotional life." The movie is a fairly accurate recreation of John's life, with his song catalog appearing throughout the film... but not in the chronological order he made them. He performed Crocodile Rock at the Troubadour but certainly didn't levitate while doing so. Fletcher kept to the facts but made an artistic decision to depict not the events themselves, but the feelings behind them.

In doing so, Fletcher gives what is arguably the most compelling example of why historical accuracy should take a backseat to the story , from the same interview: "Memories are not 'I went down to the shop and bought a pint of milk.' You know, that is a particularly dry story. If you say, 'I went down to the shop and I bought a milk bottle, but I was actually freezing and starving because I had no money, and it was the most important pint of milk I ever drank at that particular time in my life,' it's now about the emotional content of that. That makes it interesting." Facts are definitive and straightforward, but the story behind those facts is interesting, and there is no better medium than a movie to paint a picture of those stories. So if you bemoan the lack of historical accuracy in biopics, it would serve you well to heed Phoenix's suggestion and hit the library, not the multiplex. But bring your own popcorn.

Napoleon is now playing in theaters.

Buy Tickets Here

To revisit this article, visit My Profile, then View saved stories .

• What Is Cinema?
• Newsletters

Brian Cox Thinks Joaquin Phoenix Was “Truly Terrible” in Napoleon

By Chris Murphy

Brian Cox , the foremost interpreter of the phrase “fuck off,” is not one to mince his words. Per the Evening Standard, Cox made that much clear on Sunday night when he absolutely ripped apart Joaquin Phoenix ’s performance in Napoleon , calling it “truly terrible” and saying that he “would have played it a lot better” than the Oscar winner.

The Succession star reportedly launched into his diatribe against the Joker star’s take on Napoleon Bonaparte during a live talk at London’s HistFest, a multiday event celebrating the intersection of the arts, academics, and history. “Terrible. It’s terrible,” Cox said of the Ridley Scott film. “A truly terrible performance by Joaquin Phoenix.” Even after using the word terrible three times, Cox was far from finished. “It really is appalling,” said Cox. “I don’t know what he was thinking.”

Then the veteran actor really started cooking. Rather than blaming Scott or postproduction for Napoleon ’s flaws, Cox laid the blame squarely at Phoenix’s feet. “I think it’s totally his fault, and I don’t think Ridley Scott helps him. I would have played it a lot better than Joaquin Phoenix, I tell you that. You can say it’s good drama. No—it’s lies.” Given how Cox ate up Sydney Sweeney ’s Euphoria bathroom monologue , we are inclined to at least hear him out.

Cox’s criticism was not limited to Phoenix’s performance. He also took some shots at Phoenix’s name. “I think he’s well named. Joaquin…wackeen…wacky,” continued Cox. “It’s a sort of wacky performance.”

Phoenix wasn’t the only Oscar winner Cox had smoke for. The Emmy winner also took shots at the ’90s epic Braveheart, even though he had kind words to say about Mel Gibson ’s performance. “ Braveheart is a load of nonsense,” Cox said. “Mel Gibson was wonderful, but it’s a load of lies. He never impregnated the French princess. It is a bollocks [ sic ], that film.”

It wasn’t just actors and films that Cox railed against. The veteran stage performer, who’s currently starring on the West End in Eugene O’Neill’s Long Day’s Journey Into Night, also had spicy things to say about theater critics, specifically ones comparing his take on James Tyrone Sr. to Logan Roy . “It’s stupid! Why make that comparison? It’s so obvious,” he said. “Most critics are stupid. They really are. Theater criticism has gone right down the tubes. You think of those wonderful critics of the past, there’s nobody to match them now. Because they don’t do their homework.”

As for homework, Cox made it clear that he believes studying is far more important than Method acting— a practice he’s railed against in the past —when it comes to delivering a great performance. Cox called Method acting “bollocks” and stressed the importance of researching characters. “You have to do your homework,” he said. “That’s the delight of it, the information you get because you’re reading everything about Churchill and you’re building up a picture of who this person was.”

His final target of the night? Donald Trump. “I think my relationship with America will be coming to a very short, sharp end quite soon because of that very thing,” said Cox, who currently resides in Brooklyn. “It’s very hard to govern America, and you certainly don’t need idiots like Trump doing that.” An equal opportunity offender, Cox also had some light criticism for Trump’s opponent, President Joe Biden. “I do think that Biden is a good man, but he’s too old.” Kind of rich coming from a 77-year-old who just said he could have played Napoleon Bonaparte, a world leader who died at 51—but if there’s anyone who could pull it off, it’s Cox.

More Great Stories From Vanity Fair

Anne Hathaway on Tuning Out the Haters and Embracing Her True Self

Deprived of His 12 Daily Diet Cokes , Trump Falls Asleep (Again) at Hush Money Trial

Behind the Scenes With Caitlin Clark on WNBA Draft Day

A Brief History of Royals (Not) Going Public With Their Health Issues

Inside Trump’s Terrifyingly Competent 2024 Campaign

The 25 Best True-Crime Documentaries to Binge Right Now

From the Archive: The Devil in Bette Davis

Stay in the know and subscribe to Vanity Fair for just $2.50 $1 per month.

By Savannah Walsh

By Joy Press

Chris Murphy

Staff writer.

By Bess Levin

By Britt Hennemuth

By Kase Wickman

By Tom Kludt

By Julie Miller

By Jessica Zhan Mei Yu