explain the importance of qualitative research

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• What Is Qualitative Research? | Methods & Examples

What Is Qualitative Research? | Methods & Examples

Published on June 19, 2020 by Pritha Bhandari . Revised on June 22, 2023.

Qualitative research involves collecting and analyzing non-numerical data (e.g., text, video, or audio) to understand concepts, opinions, or experiences. It can be used to gather in-depth insights into a problem or generate new ideas for research.

Qualitative research is the opposite of quantitative research , which involves collecting and analyzing numerical data for statistical analysis.

Qualitative research is commonly used in the humanities and social sciences, in subjects such as anthropology, sociology, education, health sciences, history, etc.

• How does social media shape body image in teenagers?
• How do children and adults interpret healthy eating in the UK?
• What factors influence employee retention in a large organization?
• How is anxiety experienced around the world?
• How can teachers integrate social issues into science curriculums?

Table of contents

Approaches to qualitative research, qualitative research methods, qualitative data analysis, advantages of qualitative research, disadvantages of qualitative research, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about qualitative research.

Qualitative research is used to understand how people experience the world. While there are many approaches to qualitative research, they tend to be flexible and focus on retaining rich meaning when interpreting data.

Common approaches include grounded theory, ethnography , action research , phenomenological research, and narrative research. They share some similarities, but emphasize different aims and perspectives.

Note that qualitative research is at risk for certain research biases including the Hawthorne effect , observer bias , recall bias , and social desirability bias . While not always totally avoidable, awareness of potential biases as you collect and analyze your data can prevent them from impacting your work too much.

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

Each of the research approaches involve using one or more data collection methods . These are some of the most common qualitative methods:

• Observations: recording what you have seen, heard, or encountered in detailed field notes.
• Interviews:  personally asking people questions in one-on-one conversations.
• Focus groups: asking questions and generating discussion among a group of people.
• Surveys : distributing questionnaires with open-ended questions.
• Secondary research: collecting existing data in the form of texts, images, audio or video recordings, etc.
• You take field notes with observations and reflect on your own experiences of the company culture.
• You distribute open-ended surveys to employees across all the company’s offices by email to find out if the culture varies across locations.
• You conduct in-depth interviews with employees in your office to learn about their experiences and perspectives in greater detail.

Qualitative researchers often consider themselves “instruments” in research because all observations, interpretations and analyses are filtered through their own personal lens.

For this reason, when writing up your methodology for qualitative research, it’s important to reflect on your approach and to thoroughly explain the choices you made in collecting and analyzing the data.

Qualitative data can take the form of texts, photos, videos and audio. For example, you might be working with interview transcripts, survey responses, fieldnotes, or recordings from natural settings.

Most types of qualitative data analysis share the same five steps:

• Prepare and organize your data. This may mean transcribing interviews or typing up fieldnotes.
• Review and explore your data. Examine the data for patterns or repeated ideas that emerge.
• Develop a data coding system. Based on your initial ideas, establish a set of codes that you can apply to categorize your data.
• Assign codes to the data. For example, in qualitative survey analysis, this may mean going through each participant’s responses and tagging them with codes in a spreadsheet. As you go through your data, you can create new codes to add to your system if necessary.
• Identify recurring themes. Link codes together into cohesive, overarching themes.

There are several specific approaches to analyzing qualitative data. Although these methods share similar processes, they emphasize different concepts.

Qualitative research often tries to preserve the voice and perspective of participants and can be adjusted as new research questions arise. Qualitative research is good for:

• Flexibility

The data collection and analysis process can be adapted as new ideas or patterns emerge. They are not rigidly decided beforehand.

• Natural settings

Data collection occurs in real-world contexts or in naturalistic ways.

• Meaningful insights

Detailed descriptions of people’s experiences, feelings and perceptions can be used in designing, testing or improving systems or products.

• Generation of new ideas

Open-ended responses mean that researchers can uncover novel problems or opportunities that they wouldn’t have thought of otherwise.

Researchers must consider practical and theoretical limitations in analyzing and interpreting their data. Qualitative research suffers from:

• Unreliability

The real-world setting often makes qualitative research unreliable because of uncontrolled factors that affect the data.

• Subjectivity

Due to the researcher’s primary role in analyzing and interpreting data, qualitative research cannot be replicated . The researcher decides what is important and what is irrelevant in data analysis, so interpretations of the same data can vary greatly.

• Limited generalizability

Small samples are often used to gather detailed data about specific contexts. Despite rigorous analysis procedures, it is difficult to draw generalizable conclusions because the data may be biased and unrepresentative of the wider population .

• Labor-intensive

Although software can be used to manage and record large amounts of text, data analysis often has to be checked or performed manually.

If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Chi square goodness of fit test
• Degrees of freedom
• Null hypothesis
• Discourse analysis
• Control groups
• Mixed methods research
• Non-probability sampling
• Quantitative research
• Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Research bias

• Rosenthal effect
• Implicit bias
• Cognitive bias
• Selection bias
• Negativity bias
• Status quo bias

Quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics, while qualitative research deals with words and meanings.

Quantitative methods allow you to systematically measure variables and test hypotheses . Qualitative methods allow you to explore concepts and experiences in more detail.

There are five common approaches to qualitative research :

• Grounded theory involves collecting data in order to develop new theories.
• Ethnography involves immersing yourself in a group or organization to understand its culture.
• Narrative research involves interpreting stories to understand how people make sense of their experiences and perceptions.
• Phenomenological research involves investigating phenomena through people’s lived experiences.
• Action research links theory and practice in several cycles to drive innovative changes.

Data collection is the systematic process by which observations or measurements are gathered in research. It is used in many different contexts by academics, governments, businesses, and other organizations.

There are various approaches to qualitative data analysis , but they all share five steps in common:

• Prepare and organize your data.
• Review and explore your data.
• Develop a data coding system.
• Assign codes to the data.
• Identify recurring themes.

The specifics of each step depend on the focus of the analysis. Some common approaches include textual analysis , thematic analysis , and discourse analysis .

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Bhandari, P. (2023, June 22). What Is Qualitative Research? | Methods & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved September 5, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/qualitative-research/

Is this article helpful?

Pritha Bhandari

Other students also liked, qualitative vs. quantitative research | differences, examples & methods, how to do thematic analysis | step-by-step guide & examples, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".

I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Methodology
• What Is Qualitative Research? | Methods & Examples

What Is Qualitative Research? | Methods & Examples

Published on 4 April 2022 by Pritha Bhandari . Revised on 30 January 2023.

Qualitative research involves collecting and analysing non-numerical data (e.g., text, video, or audio) to understand concepts, opinions, or experiences. It can be used to gather in-depth insights into a problem or generate new ideas for research.

Qualitative research is the opposite of quantitative research , which involves collecting and analysing numerical data for statistical analysis.

Qualitative research is commonly used in the humanities and social sciences, in subjects such as anthropology, sociology, education, health sciences, and history.

• How does social media shape body image in teenagers?
• How do children and adults interpret healthy eating in the UK?
• What factors influence employee retention in a large organisation?
• How is anxiety experienced around the world?
• How can teachers integrate social issues into science curriculums?

Table of contents

Approaches to qualitative research, qualitative research methods, qualitative data analysis, advantages of qualitative research, disadvantages of qualitative research, frequently asked questions about qualitative research.

Qualitative research is used to understand how people experience the world. While there are many approaches to qualitative research, they tend to be flexible and focus on retaining rich meaning when interpreting data.

Common approaches include grounded theory, ethnography, action research, phenomenological research, and narrative research. They share some similarities, but emphasise different aims and perspectives.

Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.

Each of the research approaches involve using one or more data collection methods . These are some of the most common qualitative methods:

• Observations: recording what you have seen, heard, or encountered in detailed field notes.
• Interviews:  personally asking people questions in one-on-one conversations.
• Focus groups: asking questions and generating discussion among a group of people.
• Surveys : distributing questionnaires with open-ended questions.
• Secondary research: collecting existing data in the form of texts, images, audio or video recordings, etc.
• You take field notes with observations and reflect on your own experiences of the company culture.
• You distribute open-ended surveys to employees across all the company’s offices by email to find out if the culture varies across locations.
• You conduct in-depth interviews with employees in your office to learn about their experiences and perspectives in greater detail.

Qualitative researchers often consider themselves ‘instruments’ in research because all observations, interpretations and analyses are filtered through their own personal lens.

For this reason, when writing up your methodology for qualitative research, it’s important to reflect on your approach and to thoroughly explain the choices you made in collecting and analysing the data.

Qualitative data can take the form of texts, photos, videos and audio. For example, you might be working with interview transcripts, survey responses, fieldnotes, or recordings from natural settings.

Most types of qualitative data analysis share the same five steps:

• Prepare and organise your data. This may mean transcribing interviews or typing up fieldnotes.
• Review and explore your data. Examine the data for patterns or repeated ideas that emerge.
• Develop a data coding system. Based on your initial ideas, establish a set of codes that you can apply to categorise your data.
• Assign codes to the data. For example, in qualitative survey analysis, this may mean going through each participant’s responses and tagging them with codes in a spreadsheet. As you go through your data, you can create new codes to add to your system if necessary.
• Identify recurring themes. Link codes together into cohesive, overarching themes.

There are several specific approaches to analysing qualitative data. Although these methods share similar processes, they emphasise different concepts.

Qualitative research often tries to preserve the voice and perspective of participants and can be adjusted as new research questions arise. Qualitative research is good for:

• Flexibility

The data collection and analysis process can be adapted as new ideas or patterns emerge. They are not rigidly decided beforehand.

• Natural settings

Data collection occurs in real-world contexts or in naturalistic ways.

• Meaningful insights

Detailed descriptions of people’s experiences, feelings and perceptions can be used in designing, testing or improving systems or products.

• Generation of new ideas

Open-ended responses mean that researchers can uncover novel problems or opportunities that they wouldn’t have thought of otherwise.

Researchers must consider practical and theoretical limitations in analysing and interpreting their data. Qualitative research suffers from:

• Unreliability

The real-world setting often makes qualitative research unreliable because of uncontrolled factors that affect the data.

• Subjectivity

Due to the researcher’s primary role in analysing and interpreting data, qualitative research cannot be replicated . The researcher decides what is important and what is irrelevant in data analysis, so interpretations of the same data can vary greatly.

• Limited generalisability

Small samples are often used to gather detailed data about specific contexts. Despite rigorous analysis procedures, it is difficult to draw generalisable conclusions because the data may be biased and unrepresentative of the wider population .

• Labour-intensive

Although software can be used to manage and record large amounts of text, data analysis often has to be checked or performed manually.

Quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics, while qualitative research deals with words and meanings.

Quantitative methods allow you to test a hypothesis by systematically collecting and analysing data, while qualitative methods allow you to explore ideas and experiences in depth.

There are five common approaches to qualitative research :

• Grounded theory involves collecting data in order to develop new theories.
• Ethnography involves immersing yourself in a group or organisation to understand its culture.
• Narrative research involves interpreting stories to understand how people make sense of their experiences and perceptions.
• Phenomenological research involves investigating phenomena through people’s lived experiences.
• Action research links theory and practice in several cycles to drive innovative changes.

Data collection is the systematic process by which observations or measurements are gathered in research. It is used in many different contexts by academics, governments, businesses, and other organisations.

There are various approaches to qualitative data analysis , but they all share five steps in common:

• Prepare and organise your data.
• Review and explore your data.
• Develop a data coding system.
• Assign codes to the data.
• Identify recurring themes.

The specifics of each step depend on the focus of the analysis. Some common approaches include textual analysis , thematic analysis , and discourse analysis .

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

Bhandari, P. (2023, January 30). What Is Qualitative Research? | Methods & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 3 September 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/research-methods/introduction-to-qualitative-research/

Is this article helpful?

Pritha Bhandari

• Privacy Policy

Home » Qualitative Research – Methods, Analysis Types and Guide

Qualitative Research – Methods, Analysis Types and Guide

Table of Contents

Qualitative Research

Qualitative research is a type of research methodology that focuses on exploring and understanding people’s beliefs, attitudes, behaviors, and experiences through the collection and analysis of non-numerical data. It seeks to answer research questions through the examination of subjective data, such as interviews, focus groups, observations, and textual analysis.

Qualitative research aims to uncover the meaning and significance of social phenomena, and it typically involves a more flexible and iterative approach to data collection and analysis compared to quantitative research. Qualitative research is often used in fields such as sociology, anthropology, psychology, and education.

Qualitative Research Methods

Qualitative Research Methods are as follows:

One-to-One Interview

This method involves conducting an interview with a single participant to gain a detailed understanding of their experiences, attitudes, and beliefs. One-to-one interviews can be conducted in-person, over the phone, or through video conferencing. The interviewer typically uses open-ended questions to encourage the participant to share their thoughts and feelings. One-to-one interviews are useful for gaining detailed insights into individual experiences.

Focus Groups

This method involves bringing together a group of people to discuss a specific topic in a structured setting. The focus group is led by a moderator who guides the discussion and encourages participants to share their thoughts and opinions. Focus groups are useful for generating ideas and insights, exploring social norms and attitudes, and understanding group dynamics.

Ethnographic Studies

This method involves immersing oneself in a culture or community to gain a deep understanding of its norms, beliefs, and practices. Ethnographic studies typically involve long-term fieldwork and observation, as well as interviews and document analysis. Ethnographic studies are useful for understanding the cultural context of social phenomena and for gaining a holistic understanding of complex social processes.

Text Analysis

This method involves analyzing written or spoken language to identify patterns and themes. Text analysis can be quantitative or qualitative. Qualitative text analysis involves close reading and interpretation of texts to identify recurring themes, concepts, and patterns. Text analysis is useful for understanding media messages, public discourse, and cultural trends.

This method involves an in-depth examination of a single person, group, or event to gain an understanding of complex phenomena. Case studies typically involve a combination of data collection methods, such as interviews, observations, and document analysis, to provide a comprehensive understanding of the case. Case studies are useful for exploring unique or rare cases, and for generating hypotheses for further research.

Process of Observation

This method involves systematically observing and recording behaviors and interactions in natural settings. The observer may take notes, use audio or video recordings, or use other methods to document what they see. Process of observation is useful for understanding social interactions, cultural practices, and the context in which behaviors occur.

Record Keeping

This method involves keeping detailed records of observations, interviews, and other data collected during the research process. Record keeping is essential for ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the data, and for providing a basis for analysis and interpretation.

This method involves collecting data from a large sample of participants through a structured questionnaire. Surveys can be conducted in person, over the phone, through mail, or online. Surveys are useful for collecting data on attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors, and for identifying patterns and trends in a population.

Qualitative data analysis is a process of turning unstructured data into meaningful insights. It involves extracting and organizing information from sources like interviews, focus groups, and surveys. The goal is to understand people’s attitudes, behaviors, and motivations

Qualitative Research Analysis Methods

Qualitative Research analysis methods involve a systematic approach to interpreting and making sense of the data collected in qualitative research. Here are some common qualitative data analysis methods:

Thematic Analysis

This method involves identifying patterns or themes in the data that are relevant to the research question. The researcher reviews the data, identifies keywords or phrases, and groups them into categories or themes. Thematic analysis is useful for identifying patterns across multiple data sources and for generating new insights into the research topic.

Content Analysis

This method involves analyzing the content of written or spoken language to identify key themes or concepts. Content analysis can be quantitative or qualitative. Qualitative content analysis involves close reading and interpretation of texts to identify recurring themes, concepts, and patterns. Content analysis is useful for identifying patterns in media messages, public discourse, and cultural trends.

Discourse Analysis

This method involves analyzing language to understand how it constructs meaning and shapes social interactions. Discourse analysis can involve a variety of methods, such as conversation analysis, critical discourse analysis, and narrative analysis. Discourse analysis is useful for understanding how language shapes social interactions, cultural norms, and power relationships.

Grounded Theory Analysis

This method involves developing a theory or explanation based on the data collected. Grounded theory analysis starts with the data and uses an iterative process of coding and analysis to identify patterns and themes in the data. The theory or explanation that emerges is grounded in the data, rather than preconceived hypotheses. Grounded theory analysis is useful for understanding complex social phenomena and for generating new theoretical insights.

Narrative Analysis

This method involves analyzing the stories or narratives that participants share to gain insights into their experiences, attitudes, and beliefs. Narrative analysis can involve a variety of methods, such as structural analysis, thematic analysis, and discourse analysis. Narrative analysis is useful for understanding how individuals construct their identities, make sense of their experiences, and communicate their values and beliefs.

Phenomenological Analysis

This method involves analyzing how individuals make sense of their experiences and the meanings they attach to them. Phenomenological analysis typically involves in-depth interviews with participants to explore their experiences in detail. Phenomenological analysis is useful for understanding subjective experiences and for developing a rich understanding of human consciousness.

Comparative Analysis

This method involves comparing and contrasting data across different cases or groups to identify similarities and differences. Comparative analysis can be used to identify patterns or themes that are common across multiple cases, as well as to identify unique or distinctive features of individual cases. Comparative analysis is useful for understanding how social phenomena vary across different contexts and groups.

Applications of Qualitative Research

Qualitative research has many applications across different fields and industries. Here are some examples of how qualitative research is used:

• Market Research: Qualitative research is often used in market research to understand consumer attitudes, behaviors, and preferences. Researchers conduct focus groups and one-on-one interviews with consumers to gather insights into their experiences and perceptions of products and services.
• Health Care: Qualitative research is used in health care to explore patient experiences and perspectives on health and illness. Researchers conduct in-depth interviews with patients and their families to gather information on their experiences with different health care providers and treatments.
• Education: Qualitative research is used in education to understand student experiences and to develop effective teaching strategies. Researchers conduct classroom observations and interviews with students and teachers to gather insights into classroom dynamics and instructional practices.
• Social Work : Qualitative research is used in social work to explore social problems and to develop interventions to address them. Researchers conduct in-depth interviews with individuals and families to understand their experiences with poverty, discrimination, and other social problems.
• Anthropology : Qualitative research is used in anthropology to understand different cultures and societies. Researchers conduct ethnographic studies and observe and interview members of different cultural groups to gain insights into their beliefs, practices, and social structures.
• Psychology : Qualitative research is used in psychology to understand human behavior and mental processes. Researchers conduct in-depth interviews with individuals to explore their thoughts, feelings, and experiences.
• Public Policy : Qualitative research is used in public policy to explore public attitudes and to inform policy decisions. Researchers conduct focus groups and one-on-one interviews with members of the public to gather insights into their perspectives on different policy issues.

How to Conduct Qualitative Research

Here are some general steps for conducting qualitative research:

• Identify your research question: Qualitative research starts with a research question or set of questions that you want to explore. This question should be focused and specific, but also broad enough to allow for exploration and discovery.
• Select your research design: There are different types of qualitative research designs, including ethnography, case study, grounded theory, and phenomenology. You should select a design that aligns with your research question and that will allow you to gather the data you need to answer your research question.
• Recruit participants: Once you have your research question and design, you need to recruit participants. The number of participants you need will depend on your research design and the scope of your research. You can recruit participants through advertisements, social media, or through personal networks.
• Collect data: There are different methods for collecting qualitative data, including interviews, focus groups, observation, and document analysis. You should select the method or methods that align with your research design and that will allow you to gather the data you need to answer your research question.
• Analyze data: Once you have collected your data, you need to analyze it. This involves reviewing your data, identifying patterns and themes, and developing codes to organize your data. You can use different software programs to help you analyze your data, or you can do it manually.
• Interpret data: Once you have analyzed your data, you need to interpret it. This involves making sense of the patterns and themes you have identified, and developing insights and conclusions that answer your research question. You should be guided by your research question and use your data to support your conclusions.
• Communicate results: Once you have interpreted your data, you need to communicate your results. This can be done through academic papers, presentations, or reports. You should be clear and concise in your communication, and use examples and quotes from your data to support your findings.

Examples of Qualitative Research

Here are some real-time examples of qualitative research:

• Customer Feedback: A company may conduct qualitative research to understand the feedback and experiences of its customers. This may involve conducting focus groups or one-on-one interviews with customers to gather insights into their attitudes, behaviors, and preferences.
• Healthcare : A healthcare provider may conduct qualitative research to explore patient experiences and perspectives on health and illness. This may involve conducting in-depth interviews with patients and their families to gather information on their experiences with different health care providers and treatments.
• Education : An educational institution may conduct qualitative research to understand student experiences and to develop effective teaching strategies. This may involve conducting classroom observations and interviews with students and teachers to gather insights into classroom dynamics and instructional practices.
• Social Work: A social worker may conduct qualitative research to explore social problems and to develop interventions to address them. This may involve conducting in-depth interviews with individuals and families to understand their experiences with poverty, discrimination, and other social problems.
• Anthropology : An anthropologist may conduct qualitative research to understand different cultures and societies. This may involve conducting ethnographic studies and observing and interviewing members of different cultural groups to gain insights into their beliefs, practices, and social structures.
• Psychology : A psychologist may conduct qualitative research to understand human behavior and mental processes. This may involve conducting in-depth interviews with individuals to explore their thoughts, feelings, and experiences.
• Public Policy: A government agency or non-profit organization may conduct qualitative research to explore public attitudes and to inform policy decisions. This may involve conducting focus groups and one-on-one interviews with members of the public to gather insights into their perspectives on different policy issues.

Purpose of Qualitative Research

The purpose of qualitative research is to explore and understand the subjective experiences, behaviors, and perspectives of individuals or groups in a particular context. Unlike quantitative research, which focuses on numerical data and statistical analysis, qualitative research aims to provide in-depth, descriptive information that can help researchers develop insights and theories about complex social phenomena.

Qualitative research can serve multiple purposes, including:

• Exploring new or emerging phenomena : Qualitative research can be useful for exploring new or emerging phenomena, such as new technologies or social trends. This type of research can help researchers develop a deeper understanding of these phenomena and identify potential areas for further study.
• Understanding complex social phenomena : Qualitative research can be useful for exploring complex social phenomena, such as cultural beliefs, social norms, or political processes. This type of research can help researchers develop a more nuanced understanding of these phenomena and identify factors that may influence them.
• Generating new theories or hypotheses: Qualitative research can be useful for generating new theories or hypotheses about social phenomena. By gathering rich, detailed data about individuals’ experiences and perspectives, researchers can develop insights that may challenge existing theories or lead to new lines of inquiry.
• Providing context for quantitative data: Qualitative research can be useful for providing context for quantitative data. By gathering qualitative data alongside quantitative data, researchers can develop a more complete understanding of complex social phenomena and identify potential explanations for quantitative findings.

When to use Qualitative Research

Here are some situations where qualitative research may be appropriate:

• Exploring a new area: If little is known about a particular topic, qualitative research can help to identify key issues, generate hypotheses, and develop new theories.
• Understanding complex phenomena: Qualitative research can be used to investigate complex social, cultural, or organizational phenomena that are difficult to measure quantitatively.
• Investigating subjective experiences: Qualitative research is particularly useful for investigating the subjective experiences of individuals or groups, such as their attitudes, beliefs, values, or emotions.
• Conducting formative research: Qualitative research can be used in the early stages of a research project to develop research questions, identify potential research participants, and refine research methods.
• Evaluating interventions or programs: Qualitative research can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions or programs by collecting data on participants’ experiences, attitudes, and behaviors.

Characteristics of Qualitative Research

Qualitative research is characterized by several key features, including:

• Focus on subjective experience: Qualitative research is concerned with understanding the subjective experiences, beliefs, and perspectives of individuals or groups in a particular context. Researchers aim to explore the meanings that people attach to their experiences and to understand the social and cultural factors that shape these meanings.
• Use of open-ended questions: Qualitative research relies on open-ended questions that allow participants to provide detailed, in-depth responses. Researchers seek to elicit rich, descriptive data that can provide insights into participants’ experiences and perspectives.
• Sampling-based on purpose and diversity: Qualitative research often involves purposive sampling, in which participants are selected based on specific criteria related to the research question. Researchers may also seek to include participants with diverse experiences and perspectives to capture a range of viewpoints.
• Data collection through multiple methods: Qualitative research typically involves the use of multiple data collection methods, such as in-depth interviews, focus groups, and observation. This allows researchers to gather rich, detailed data from multiple sources, which can provide a more complete picture of participants’ experiences and perspectives.
• Inductive data analysis: Qualitative research relies on inductive data analysis, in which researchers develop theories and insights based on the data rather than testing pre-existing hypotheses. Researchers use coding and thematic analysis to identify patterns and themes in the data and to develop theories and explanations based on these patterns.
• Emphasis on researcher reflexivity: Qualitative research recognizes the importance of the researcher’s role in shaping the research process and outcomes. Researchers are encouraged to reflect on their own biases and assumptions and to be transparent about their role in the research process.

Advantages of Qualitative Research

Qualitative research offers several advantages over other research methods, including:

• Depth and detail: Qualitative research allows researchers to gather rich, detailed data that provides a deeper understanding of complex social phenomena. Through in-depth interviews, focus groups, and observation, researchers can gather detailed information about participants’ experiences and perspectives that may be missed by other research methods.
• Flexibility : Qualitative research is a flexible approach that allows researchers to adapt their methods to the research question and context. Researchers can adjust their research methods in real-time to gather more information or explore unexpected findings.
• Contextual understanding: Qualitative research is well-suited to exploring the social and cultural context in which individuals or groups are situated. Researchers can gather information about cultural norms, social structures, and historical events that may influence participants’ experiences and perspectives.
• Participant perspective : Qualitative research prioritizes the perspective of participants, allowing researchers to explore subjective experiences and understand the meanings that participants attach to their experiences.
• Theory development: Qualitative research can contribute to the development of new theories and insights about complex social phenomena. By gathering rich, detailed data and using inductive data analysis, researchers can develop new theories and explanations that may challenge existing understandings.
• Validity : Qualitative research can offer high validity by using multiple data collection methods, purposive and diverse sampling, and researcher reflexivity. This can help ensure that findings are credible and trustworthy.

Limitations of Qualitative Research

Qualitative research also has some limitations, including:

• Subjectivity : Qualitative research relies on the subjective interpretation of researchers, which can introduce bias into the research process. The researcher’s perspective, beliefs, and experiences can influence the way data is collected, analyzed, and interpreted.
• Limited generalizability: Qualitative research typically involves small, purposive samples that may not be representative of larger populations. This limits the generalizability of findings to other contexts or populations.
• Time-consuming: Qualitative research can be a time-consuming process, requiring significant resources for data collection, analysis, and interpretation.
• Resource-intensive: Qualitative research may require more resources than other research methods, including specialized training for researchers, specialized software for data analysis, and transcription services.
• Limited reliability: Qualitative research may be less reliable than quantitative research, as it relies on the subjective interpretation of researchers. This can make it difficult to replicate findings or compare results across different studies.
• Ethics and confidentiality: Qualitative research involves collecting sensitive information from participants, which raises ethical concerns about confidentiality and informed consent. Researchers must take care to protect the privacy and confidentiality of participants and obtain informed consent.

Also see Research Methods

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Quasi-Experimental Research Design – Types...

Exploratory Research – Types, Methods and...

Explanatory Research – Types, Methods, Guide

Experimental Design – Types, Methods, Guide

Qualitative Research Methods

Phenomenology – Methods, Examples and Guide

Qualitative Research: Characteristics, Design, Methods & Examples

Lauren McCall

MSc Health Psychology Graduate

MSc, Health Psychology, University of Nottingham

Lauren obtained an MSc in Health Psychology from The University of Nottingham with a distinction classification.

Learn about our Editorial Process

Saul McLeod, PhD

Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester

Saul McLeod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc

Associate Editor for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education

Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.

On This Page:

Qualitative research is a type of research methodology that focuses on gathering and analyzing non-numerical data to gain a deeper understanding of human behavior, experiences, and perspectives.

It aims to explore the “why” and “how” of a phenomenon rather than the “what,” “where,” and “when” typically addressed by quantitative research.

Unlike quantitative research, which focuses on gathering and analyzing numerical data for statistical analysis, qualitative research involves researchers interpreting data to identify themes, patterns, and meanings.

Qualitative research can be used to:

• Gain deep contextual understandings of the subjective social reality of individuals
• To answer questions about experience and meaning from the participant’s perspective
• To design hypotheses, theory must be researched using qualitative methods to determine what is important before research can begin. 

Examples of qualitative research questions include: 

• How does stress influence young adults’ behavior?
• What factors influence students’ school attendance rates in developed countries?
• How do adults interpret binge drinking in the UK?
• What are the psychological impacts of cervical cancer screening in women?
• How can mental health lessons be integrated into the school curriculum? 

Characteristics 

Naturalistic setting.

Individuals are studied in their natural setting to gain a deeper understanding of how people experience the world. This enables the researcher to understand a phenomenon close to how participants experience it. 

Naturalistic settings provide valuable contextual information to help researchers better understand and interpret the data they collect.

The environment, social interactions, and cultural factors can all influence behavior and experiences, and these elements are more easily observed in real-world settings.

Reality is socially constructed

Qualitative research aims to understand how participants make meaning of their experiences – individually or in social contexts. It assumes there is no objective reality and that the social world is interpreted (Yilmaz, 2013). 

The primacy of subject matter 

The primary aim of qualitative research is to understand the perspectives, experiences, and beliefs of individuals who have experienced the phenomenon selected for research rather than the average experiences of groups of people (Minichiello, 1990).

An in-depth understanding is attained since qualitative techniques allow participants to freely disclose their experiences, thoughts, and feelings without constraint (Tenny et al., 2022). 

Variables are complex, interwoven, and difficult to measure

Factors such as experiences, behaviors, and attitudes are complex and interwoven, so they cannot be reduced to isolated variables , making them difficult to measure quantitatively.

However, a qualitative approach enables participants to describe what, why, or how they were thinking/ feeling during a phenomenon being studied (Yilmaz, 2013). 

Emic (insider’s point of view)

The phenomenon being studied is centered on the participants’ point of view (Minichiello, 1990).

Emic is used to describe how participants interact, communicate, and behave in the research setting (Scarduzio, 2017).

Interpretive analysis

In qualitative research, interpretive analysis is crucial in making sense of the collected data.

This process involves examining the raw data, such as interview transcripts, field notes, or documents, and identifying the underlying themes, patterns, and meanings that emerge from the participants’ experiences and perspectives.

Collecting Qualitative Data

There are four main research design methods used to collect qualitative data: observations, interviews,  focus groups, and ethnography.

Observations

This method involves watching and recording phenomena as they occur in nature. Observation can be divided into two types: participant and non-participant observation.

In participant observation, the researcher actively participates in the situation/events being observed.

In non-participant observation, the researcher is not an active part of the observation and tries not to influence the behaviors they are observing (Busetto et al., 2020). 

Observations can be covert (participants are unaware that a researcher is observing them) or overt (participants are aware of the researcher’s presence and know they are being observed).

However, awareness of an observer’s presence may influence participants’ behavior. 

Interviews give researchers a window into the world of a participant by seeking their account of an event, situation, or phenomenon. They are usually conducted on a one-to-one basis and can be distinguished according to the level at which they are structured (Punch, 2013). 

Structured interviews involve predetermined questions and sequences to ensure replicability and comparability. However, they are unable to explore emerging issues.

Informal interviews consist of spontaneous, casual conversations which are closer to the truth of a phenomenon. However, information is gathered using quick notes made by the researcher and is therefore subject to recall bias. 

Semi-structured interviews have a flexible structure, phrasing, and placement so emerging issues can be explored (Denny & Weckesser, 2022).

The use of probing questions and clarification can lead to a detailed understanding, but semi-structured interviews can be time-consuming and subject to interviewer bias. 

Focus groups 

Similar to interviews, focus groups elicit a rich and detailed account of an experience. However, focus groups are more dynamic since participants with shared characteristics construct this account together (Denny & Weckesser, 2022).

A shared narrative is built between participants to capture a group experience shaped by a shared context. 

The researcher takes on the role of a moderator, who will establish ground rules and guide the discussion by following a topic guide to focus the group discussions.

Typically, focus groups have 4-10 participants as a discussion can be difficult to facilitate with more than this, and this number allows everyone the time to speak.

Ethnography

Ethnography is a methodology used to study a group of people’s behaviors and social interactions in their environment (Reeves et al., 2008).

Data are collected using methods such as observations, field notes, or structured/ unstructured interviews.

The aim of ethnography is to provide detailed, holistic insights into people’s behavior and perspectives within their natural setting. In order to achieve this, researchers immerse themselves in a community or organization. 

Due to the flexibility and real-world focus of ethnography, researchers are able to gather an in-depth, nuanced understanding of people’s experiences, knowledge and perspectives that are influenced by culture and society.

In order to develop a representative picture of a particular culture/ context, researchers must conduct extensive field work. 

This can be time-consuming as researchers may need to immerse themselves into a community/ culture for a few days, or possibly a few years.

Qualitative Data Analysis Methods

Different methods can be used for analyzing qualitative data. The researcher chooses based on the objectives of their study. 

The researcher plays a key role in the interpretation of data, making decisions about the coding, theming, decontextualizing, and recontextualizing of data (Starks & Trinidad, 2007). 

Grounded theory

Grounded theory is a qualitative method specifically designed to inductively generate theory from data. It was developed by Glaser and Strauss in 1967 (Glaser & Strauss, 2017).

This methodology aims to develop theories (rather than test hypotheses) that explain a social process, action, or interaction (Petty et al., 2012). To inform the developing theory, data collection and analysis run simultaneously. 

There are three key types of coding used in grounded theory: initial (open), intermediate (axial), and advanced (selective) coding. 

Throughout the analysis, memos should be created to document methodological and theoretical ideas about the data. Data should be collected and analyzed until data saturation is reached and a theory is developed. 

Content analysis

Content analysis was first used in the early twentieth century to analyze textual materials such as newspapers and political speeches.

Content analysis is a research method used to identify and analyze the presence and patterns of themes, concepts, or words in data (Vaismoradi et al., 2013). 

This research method can be used to analyze data in different formats, which can be written, oral, or visual. 

The goal of content analysis is to develop themes that capture the underlying meanings of data (Schreier, 2012). 

Qualitative content analysis can be used to validate existing theories, support the development of new models and theories, and provide in-depth descriptions of particular settings or experiences.

The following six steps provide a guideline for how to conduct qualitative content analysis.

• Define a Research Question : To start content analysis, a clear research question should be developed.
• Identify and Collect Data : Establish the inclusion criteria for your data. Find the relevant sources to analyze.
• Define the Unit or Theme of Analysis : Categorize the content into themes. Themes can be a word, phrase, or sentence.
• Develop Rules for Coding your Data : Define a set of coding rules to ensure that all data are coded consistently.
• Code the Data : Follow the coding rules to categorize data into themes.
• Analyze the Results and Draw Conclusions : Examine the data to identify patterns and draw conclusions in relation to your research question.

Discourse analysis

Discourse analysis is a research method used to study written/ spoken language in relation to its social context (Wood & Kroger, 2000).

In discourse analysis, the researcher interprets details of language materials and the context in which it is situated.

Discourse analysis aims to understand the functions of language (how language is used in real life) and how meaning is conveyed by language in different contexts. Researchers use discourse analysis to investigate social groups and how language is used to achieve specific communication goals.

Different methods of discourse analysis can be used depending on the aims and objectives of a study. However, the following steps provide a guideline on how to conduct discourse analysis.

• Define the Research Question : Develop a relevant research question to frame the analysis.
• Gather Data and Establish the Context : Collect research materials (e.g., interview transcripts, documents). Gather factual details and review the literature to construct a theory about the social and historical context of your study.
• Analyze the Content : Closely examine various components of the text, such as the vocabulary, sentences, paragraphs, and structure of the text. Identify patterns relevant to the research question to create codes, then group these into themes.
• Review the Results : Reflect on the findings to examine the function of the language, and the meaning and context of the discourse. 

Thematic analysis

Thematic analysis is a method used to identify, interpret, and report patterns in data, such as commonalities or contrasts. 

Although the origin of thematic analysis can be traced back to the early twentieth century, understanding and clarity of thematic analysis is attributed to Braun and Clarke (2006).

Thematic analysis aims to develop themes (patterns of meaning) across a dataset to address a research question. 

In thematic analysis, qualitative data is gathered using techniques such as interviews, focus groups, and questionnaires. Audio recordings are transcribed. The dataset is then explored and interpreted by a researcher to identify patterns. 

This occurs through the rigorous process of data familiarisation, coding, theme development, and revision. These identified patterns provide a summary of the dataset and can be used to address a research question.

Themes are developed by exploring the implicit and explicit meanings within the data. Two different approaches are used to generate themes: inductive and deductive. 

An inductive approach allows themes to emerge from the data. In contrast, a deductive approach uses existing theories or knowledge to apply preconceived ideas to the data.

Phases of Thematic Analysis

Braun and Clarke (2006) provide a guide of the six phases of thematic analysis. These phases can be applied flexibly to fit research questions and data. 

Template analysis

Template analysis refers to a specific method of thematic analysis which uses hierarchical coding (Brooks et al., 2014).

Template analysis is used to analyze textual data, for example, interview transcripts or open-ended responses on a written questionnaire.

To conduct template analysis, a coding template must be developed (usually from a subset of the data) and subsequently revised and refined. This template represents the themes identified by researchers as important in the dataset. 

Codes are ordered hierarchically within the template, with the highest-level codes demonstrating overarching themes in the data and lower-level codes representing constituent themes with a narrower focus.

A guideline for the main procedural steps for conducting template analysis is outlined below.

• Familiarization with the Data : Read (and reread) the dataset in full. Engage, reflect, and take notes on data that may be relevant to the research question.
• Preliminary Coding : Identify initial codes using guidance from the a priori codes, identified before the analysis as likely to be beneficial and relevant to the analysis.
• Organize Themes : Organize themes into meaningful clusters. Consider the relationships between the themes both within and between clusters.
• Produce an Initial Template : Develop an initial template. This may be based on a subset of the data.
• Apply and Develop the Template : Apply the initial template to further data and make any necessary modifications. Refinements of the template may include adding themes, removing themes, or changing the scope/title of themes. 
• Finalize Template : Finalize the template, then apply it to the entire dataset. 

Frame analysis

Frame analysis is a comparative form of thematic analysis which systematically analyzes data using a matrix output.

Ritchie and Spencer (1994) developed this set of techniques to analyze qualitative data in applied policy research. Frame analysis aims to generate theory from data.

Frame analysis encourages researchers to organize and manage their data using summarization.

This results in a flexible and unique matrix output, in which individual participants (or cases) are represented by rows and themes are represented by columns. 

Each intersecting cell is used to summarize findings relating to the corresponding participant and theme.

Frame analysis has five distinct phases which are interrelated, forming a methodical and rigorous framework.

• Familiarization with the Data : Familiarize yourself with all the transcripts. Immerse yourself in the details of each transcript and start to note recurring themes.
• Develop a Theoretical Framework : Identify recurrent/ important themes and add them to a chart. Provide a framework/ structure for the analysis.
• Indexing : Apply the framework systematically to the entire study data.
• Summarize Data in Analytical Framework : Reduce the data into brief summaries of participants’ accounts.
• Mapping and Interpretation : Compare themes and subthemes and check against the original transcripts. Group the data into categories and provide an explanation for them.

Preventing Bias in Qualitative Research

To evaluate qualitative studies, the CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme) checklist for qualitative studies can be used to ensure all aspects of a study have been considered (CASP, 2018).

The quality of research can be enhanced and assessed using criteria such as checklists, reflexivity, co-coding, and member-checking. 

Co-coding 

Relying on only one researcher to interpret rich and complex data may risk key insights and alternative viewpoints being missed. Therefore, coding is often performed by multiple researchers.

A common strategy must be defined at the beginning of the coding process  (Busetto et al., 2020). This includes establishing a useful coding list and finding a common definition of individual codes.

Transcripts are initially coded independently by researchers and then compared and consolidated to minimize error or bias and to bring confirmation of findings. 

Member checking

Member checking (or respondent validation) involves checking back with participants to see if the research resonates with their experiences (Russell & Gregory, 2003).

Data can be returned to participants after data collection or when results are first available. For example, participants may be provided with their interview transcript and asked to verify whether this is a complete and accurate representation of their views.

Participants may then clarify or elaborate on their responses to ensure they align with their views (Shenton, 2004).

This feedback becomes part of data collection and ensures accurate descriptions/ interpretations of phenomena (Mays & Pope, 2000). 

Reflexivity in qualitative research

Reflexivity typically involves examining your own judgments, practices, and belief systems during data collection and analysis. It aims to identify any personal beliefs which may affect the research. 

Reflexivity is essential in qualitative research to ensure methodological transparency and complete reporting. This enables readers to understand how the interaction between the researcher and participant shapes the data.

Depending on the research question and population being researched, factors that need to be considered include the experience of the researcher, how the contact was established and maintained, age, gender, and ethnicity.

These details are important because, in qualitative research, the researcher is a dynamic part of the research process and actively influences the outcome of the research (Boeije, 2014). 

Reflexivity Example

Who you are and your characteristics influence how you collect and analyze data. Here is an example of a reflexivity statement for research on smoking. I am a 30-year-old white female from a middle-class background. I live in the southwest of England and have been educated to master’s level. I have been involved in two research projects on oral health. I have never smoked, but I have witnessed how smoking can cause ill health from my volunteering in a smoking cessation clinic. My research aspirations are to help to develop interventions to help smokers quit.

Establishing Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research

Trustworthiness is a concept used to assess the quality and rigor of qualitative research. Four criteria are used to assess a study’s trustworthiness: credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability.

1. Credibility in Qualitative Research

Credibility refers to how accurately the results represent the reality and viewpoints of the participants.

To establish credibility in research, participants’ views and the researcher’s representation of their views need to align (Tobin & Begley, 2004).

To increase the credibility of findings, researchers may use data source triangulation, investigator triangulation, peer debriefing, or member checking (Lincoln & Guba, 1985). 

2. Transferability in Qualitative Research

Transferability refers to how generalizable the findings are: whether the findings may be applied to another context, setting, or group (Tobin & Begley, 2004).

Transferability can be enhanced by giving thorough and in-depth descriptions of the research setting, sample, and methods (Nowell et al., 2017). 

3. Dependability in Qualitative Research

Dependability is the extent to which the study could be replicated under similar conditions and the findings would be consistent.

Researchers can establish dependability using methods such as audit trails so readers can see the research process is logical and traceable (Koch, 1994).

4. Confirmability in Qualitative Research

Confirmability is concerned with establishing that there is a clear link between the researcher’s interpretations/ findings and the data.

Researchers can achieve confirmability by demonstrating how conclusions and interpretations were arrived at (Nowell et al., 2017).

This enables readers to understand the reasoning behind the decisions made. 

Audit Trails in Qualitative Research

An audit trail provides evidence of the decisions made by the researcher regarding theory, research design, and data collection, as well as the steps they have chosen to manage, analyze, and report data. 

The researcher must provide a clear rationale to demonstrate how conclusions were reached in their study.

A clear description of the research path must be provided to enable readers to trace through the researcher’s logic (Halpren, 1983).

Researchers should maintain records of the raw data, field notes, transcripts, and a reflective journal in order to provide a clear audit trail. 

Discovery of unexpected data

Open-ended questions in qualitative research mean the researcher can probe an interview topic and enable the participant to elaborate on responses in an unrestricted manner.

This allows unexpected data to emerge, which can lead to further research into that topic. 

The exploratory nature of qualitative research helps generate hypotheses that can be tested quantitatively (Busetto et al., 2020).

Flexibility

Data collection and analysis can be modified and adapted to take the research in a different direction if new ideas or patterns emerge in the data.

This enables researchers to investigate new opportunities while firmly maintaining their research goals. 

Naturalistic settings

The behaviors of participants are recorded in real-world settings. Studies that use real-world settings have high ecological validity since participants behave more authentically. 

Limitations

Time-consuming .

Qualitative research results in large amounts of data which often need to be transcribed and analyzed manually.

Even when software is used, transcription can be inaccurate, and using software for analysis can result in many codes which need to be condensed into themes. 

Subjectivity 

The researcher has an integral role in collecting and interpreting qualitative data. Therefore, the conclusions reached are from their perspective and experience.

Consequently, interpretations of data from another researcher may vary greatly. 

Limited generalizability

The aim of qualitative research is to provide a detailed, contextualized understanding of an aspect of the human experience from a relatively small sample size.

Despite rigorous analysis procedures, conclusions drawn cannot be generalized to the wider population since data may be biased or unrepresentative.

Therefore, results are only applicable to a small group of the population. 

While individual qualitative studies are often limited in their generalizability due to factors such as sample size and context, metasynthesis enables researchers to synthesize findings from multiple studies, potentially leading to more generalizable conclusions.

By integrating findings from studies conducted in diverse settings and with different populations, metasynthesis can provide broader insights into the phenomenon of interest.

Extraneous variables

Qualitative research is often conducted in real-world settings. This may cause results to be unreliable since extraneous variables may affect the data, for example:

• Situational variables : different environmental conditions may influence participants’ behavior in a study. The random variation in factors (such as noise or lighting) may be difficult to control in real-world settings.
• Participant characteristics : this includes any characteristics that may influence how a participant answers/ behaves in a study. This may include a participant’s mood, gender, age, ethnicity, sexual identity, IQ, etc.
• Experimenter effect : experimenter effect refers to how a researcher’s unintentional influence can change the outcome of a study. This occurs when (i) their interactions with participants unintentionally change participants’ behaviors or (ii) due to errors in observation, interpretation, or analysis. 

What sample size should qualitative research be?

The sample size for qualitative studies has been recommended to include a minimum of 12 participants to reach data saturation (Braun, 2013).

Are surveys qualitative or quantitative?

Surveys can be used to gather information from a sample qualitatively or quantitatively. Qualitative surveys use open-ended questions to gather detailed information from a large sample using free text responses.

The use of open-ended questions allows for unrestricted responses where participants use their own words, enabling the collection of more in-depth information than closed-ended questions.

In contrast, quantitative surveys consist of closed-ended questions with multiple-choice answer options. Quantitative surveys are ideal to gather a statistical representation of a population.

What are the ethical considerations of qualitative research?

Before conducting a study, you must think about any risks that could occur and take steps to prevent them. Participant Protection : Researchers must protect participants from physical and mental harm. This means you must not embarrass, frighten, offend, or harm participants. Transparency : Researchers are obligated to clearly communicate how they will collect, store, analyze, use, and share the data. Confidentiality : You need to consider how to maintain the confidentiality and anonymity of participants’ data.

What is triangulation in qualitative research?

Triangulation refers to the use of several approaches in a study to comprehensively understand phenomena. This method helps to increase the validity and credibility of research findings. 

Types of triangulation include method triangulation (using multiple methods to gather data); investigator triangulation (multiple researchers for collecting/ analyzing data), theory triangulation (comparing several theoretical perspectives to explain a phenomenon), and data source triangulation (using data from various times, locations, and people; Carter et al., 2014).

Why is qualitative research important?

Qualitative research allows researchers to describe and explain the social world. The exploratory nature of qualitative research helps to generate hypotheses that can then be tested quantitatively.

In qualitative research, participants are able to express their thoughts, experiences, and feelings without constraint.

Additionally, researchers are able to follow up on participants’ answers in real-time, generating valuable discussion around a topic. This enables researchers to gain a nuanced understanding of phenomena which is difficult to attain using quantitative methods.

What is coding data in qualitative research?

Coding data is a qualitative data analysis strategy in which a section of text is assigned with a label that describes its content.

These labels may be words or phrases which represent important (and recurring) patterns in the data.

This process enables researchers to identify related content across the dataset. Codes can then be used to group similar types of data to generate themes.

What is the difference between qualitative and quantitative research?

Qualitative research involves the collection and analysis of non-numerical data in order to understand experiences and meanings from the participant’s perspective.

This can provide rich, in-depth insights on complicated phenomena. Qualitative data may be collected using interviews, focus groups, or observations.

In contrast, quantitative research involves the collection and analysis of numerical data to measure the frequency, magnitude, or relationships of variables. This can provide objective and reliable evidence that can be generalized to the wider population.

Quantitative data may be collected using closed-ended questionnaires or experiments.

What is trustworthiness in qualitative research?

Trustworthiness is a concept used to assess the quality and rigor of qualitative research. Four criteria are used to assess a study’s trustworthiness: credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. 

Credibility refers to how accurately the results represent the reality and viewpoints of the participants. Transferability refers to whether the findings may be applied to another context, setting, or group.

Dependability is the extent to which the findings are consistent and reliable. Confirmability refers to the objectivity of findings (not influenced by the bias or assumptions of researchers).

What is data saturation in qualitative research?

Data saturation is a methodological principle used to guide the sample size of a qualitative research study.

Data saturation is proposed as a necessary methodological component in qualitative research (Saunders et al., 2018) as it is a vital criterion for discontinuing data collection and/or analysis. 

The intention of data saturation is to find “no new data, no new themes, no new coding, and ability to replicate the study” (Guest et al., 2006). Therefore, enough data has been gathered to make conclusions.

Why is sampling in qualitative research important?

In quantitative research, large sample sizes are used to provide statistically significant quantitative estimates.

This is because quantitative research aims to provide generalizable conclusions that represent populations.

However, the aim of sampling in qualitative research is to gather data that will help the researcher understand the depth, complexity, variation, or context of a phenomenon. The small sample sizes in qualitative studies support the depth of case-oriented analysis.

What is narrative analysis?

Narrative analysis is a qualitative research method used to understand how individuals create stories from their personal experiences.

There is an emphasis on understanding the context in which a narrative is constructed, recognizing the influence of historical, cultural, and social factors on storytelling.

Researchers can use different methods together to explore a research question.

Some narrative researchers focus on the content of what is said, using thematic narrative analysis, while others focus on the structure, such as holistic-form or categorical-form structural narrative analysis. Others focus on how the narrative is produced and performed.

Boeije, H. (2014). Analysis in qualitative research. Sage.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology , 3 (2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brooks, J., McCluskey, S., Turley, E., & King, N. (2014). The utility of template analysis in qualitative psychology research. Qualitative Research in Psychology , 12 (2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.955224

Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological research and practice , 2 (1), 14-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z 

Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology nursing forum , 41 (5), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547

Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2018). CASP Checklist: 10 questions to help you make sense of a Qualitative research. https://casp-uk.net/images/checklist/documents/CASP-Qualitative-Studies-Checklist/CASP-Qualitative-Checklist-2018_fillable_form.pdf Accessed: March 15 2023

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Successful Qualitative Research , 1-400.

Denny, E., & Weckesser, A. (2022). How to do qualitative research?: Qualitative research methods. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology , 129 (7), 1166-1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17150 

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). The discovery of grounded theory. The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203793206-1

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18 (1), 59-82. doi:10.1177/1525822X05279903

Halpren, E. S. (1983). Auditing naturalistic inquiries: The development and application of a model (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington.

Hammarberg, K., Kirkman, M., & de Lacey, S. (2016). Qualitative research methods: When to use them and how to judge them. Human Reproduction , 31 (3), 498–501. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev334

Koch, T. (1994). Establishing rigour in qualitative research: The decision trail. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19, 976–986. doi:10.1111/ j.1365-2648.1994.tb01177.x

Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2000). Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ, 320(7226), 50–52.

Minichiello, V. (1990). In-Depth Interviewing: Researching People. Longman Cheshire.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Petty, N. J., Thomson, O. P., & Stew, G. (2012). Ready for a paradigm shift? part 2: Introducing qualitative research methodologies and methods. Manual Therapy , 17 (5), 378–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2012.03.004

Punch, K. F. (2013). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage

Reeves, S., Kuper, A., & Hodges, B. D. (2008). Qualitative research methodologies: Ethnography. BMJ , 337 (aug07 3). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1020

Russell, C. K., & Gregory, D. M. (2003). Evaluation of qualitative research studies. Evidence Based Nursing, 6 (2), 36–40.

Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & quantity , 52 (4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8

Scarduzio, J. A. (2017). Emic approach to qualitative research. The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, 1–2 . https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0082

Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice / Margrit Schreier.

Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22 , 63–75.

Starks, H., & Trinidad, S. B. (2007). Choose your method: a comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitative health research , 17 (10), 1372–1380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307307031

Tenny, S., Brannan, J. M., & Brannan, G. D. (2022). Qualitative Study. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing.

Tobin, G. A., & Begley, C. M. (2004). Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48, 388–396. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03207.x

Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & health sciences , 15 (3), 398-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048

Wood L. A., Kroger R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Sage.

Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Traditions: epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European journal of education , 48 (2), 311-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12014

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• My Bibliography
• Collections
• Citation manager

Save citation to file

Email citation, add to collections.

• Create a new collection
• Add to an existing collection

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed, qualitative study, affiliations.

• 1 University of Nebraska Medical Center
• 2 GDB Research and Statistical Consulting
• 3 GDB Research and Statistical Consulting/McLaren Macomb Hospital
• PMID: 29262162
• Bookshelf ID: NBK470395

Qualitative research is a type of research that explores and provides deeper insights into real-world problems. Instead of collecting numerical data points or intervening or introducing treatments just like in quantitative research, qualitative research helps generate hypothenar to further investigate and understand quantitative data. Qualitative research gathers participants' experiences, perceptions, and behavior. It answers the hows and whys instead of how many or how much. It could be structured as a standalone study, purely relying on qualitative data, or part of mixed-methods research that combines qualitative and quantitative data. This review introduces the readers to some basic concepts, definitions, terminology, and applications of qualitative research.

Qualitative research, at its core, asks open-ended questions whose answers are not easily put into numbers, such as "how" and "why." Due to the open-ended nature of the research questions, qualitative research design is often not linear like quantitative design. One of the strengths of qualitative research is its ability to explain processes and patterns of human behavior that can be difficult to quantify. Phenomena such as experiences, attitudes, and behaviors can be complex to capture accurately and quantitatively. In contrast, a qualitative approach allows participants themselves to explain how, why, or what they were thinking, feeling, and experiencing at a particular time or during an event of interest. Quantifying qualitative data certainly is possible, but at its core, qualitative data is looking for themes and patterns that can be difficult to quantify, and it is essential to ensure that the context and narrative of qualitative work are not lost by trying to quantify something that is not meant to be quantified.

However, while qualitative research is sometimes placed in opposition to quantitative research, where they are necessarily opposites and therefore "compete" against each other and the philosophical paradigms associated with each other, qualitative and quantitative work are neither necessarily opposites, nor are they incompatible. While qualitative and quantitative approaches are different, they are not necessarily opposites and certainly not mutually exclusive. For instance, qualitative research can help expand and deepen understanding of data or results obtained from quantitative analysis. For example, say a quantitative analysis has determined a correlation between length of stay and level of patient satisfaction, but why does this correlation exist? This dual-focus scenario shows one way in which qualitative and quantitative research could be integrated.

Copyright © 2024, StatPearls Publishing LLC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: Steven Tenny declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Janelle Brannan declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Grace Brannan declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

• Introduction
• Issues of Concern
• Clinical Significance
• Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
• Review Questions

Similar articles

• Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K, Williams J, Qi YP, Gutman J, Yeung L, Mai C, Finkelstain J, Mehta S, Pons-Duran C, Menéndez C, Moraleda C, Rogers L, Daniels K, Green P. Crider K, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
• Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012). Foffi G, Pastore A, Piazza F, Temussi PA. Foffi G, et al. Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2. Phys Biol. 2013. PMID: 23912807
• The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF, Ovelman C, McGuire W. Soll RF, et al. Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
• Invited review: Qualitative research in dairy science-A narrative review. Ritter C, Koralesky KE, Saraceni J, Roche S, Vaarst M, Kelton D. Ritter C, et al. J Dairy Sci. 2023 Sep;106(9):5880-5895. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-23125. Epub 2023 Jul 18. J Dairy Sci. 2023. PMID: 37474366 Review.
• Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence. Husk K, Lovell R, Cooper C, Stahl-Timmins W, Garside R. Husk K, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27207731 Free PMC article. Review.
• Moser A, Korstjens I. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 1: Introduction. Eur J Gen Pract. 2017 Dec;23(1):271-273. - PMC - PubMed
• Cleland JA. The qualitative orientation in medical education research. Korean J Med Educ. 2017 Jun;29(2):61-71. - PMC - PubMed
• Foley G, Timonen V. Using Grounded Theory Method to Capture and Analyze Health Care Experiences. Health Serv Res. 2015 Aug;50(4):1195-210. - PMC - PubMed
• Devers KJ. How will we know "good" qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research. Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1153-88. - PMC - PubMed
• Huston P, Rowan M. Qualitative studies. Their role in medical research. Can Fam Physician. 1998 Nov;44:2453-8. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

• Search in PubMed
• Search in MeSH
• Add to Search

Related information

• Cited in Books

LinkOut - more resources

Full text sources.

• NCBI Bookshelf

• Citation Manager

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

Criteria for Good Qualitative Research: A Comprehensive Review

• Regular Article
• Open access
• Published: 18 September 2021
• Volume 31 , pages 679–689, ( 2022 )

Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

• Drishti Yadav   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2974-0323 1  

101k Accesses

47 Citations

70 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

This review aims to synthesize a published set of evaluative criteria for good qualitative research. The aim is to shed light on existing standards for assessing the rigor of qualitative research encompassing a range of epistemological and ontological standpoints. Using a systematic search strategy, published journal articles that deliberate criteria for rigorous research were identified. Then, references of relevant articles were surveyed to find noteworthy, distinct, and well-defined pointers to good qualitative research. This review presents an investigative assessment of the pivotal features in qualitative research that can permit the readers to pass judgment on its quality and to condemn it as good research when objectively and adequately utilized. Overall, this review underlines the crux of qualitative research and accentuates the necessity to evaluate such research by the very tenets of its being. It also offers some prospects and recommendations to improve the quality of qualitative research. Based on the findings of this review, it is concluded that quality criteria are the aftereffect of socio-institutional procedures and existing paradigmatic conducts. Owing to the paradigmatic diversity of qualitative research, a single and specific set of quality criteria is neither feasible nor anticipated. Since qualitative research is not a cohesive discipline, researchers need to educate and familiarize themselves with applicable norms and decisive factors to evaluate qualitative research from within its theoretical and methodological framework of origin.

Similar content being viewed by others

Good Qualitative Research: Opening up the Debate

Beyond qualitative/quantitative structuralism: the positivist qualitative research and the paradigmatic disclaimer.

What is Qualitative in Research

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Introduction

“… It is important to regularly dialogue about what makes for good qualitative research” (Tracy, 2010 , p. 837)

To decide what represents good qualitative research is highly debatable. There are numerous methods that are contained within qualitative research and that are established on diverse philosophical perspectives. Bryman et al., ( 2008 , p. 262) suggest that “It is widely assumed that whereas quality criteria for quantitative research are well‐known and widely agreed, this is not the case for qualitative research.” Hence, the question “how to evaluate the quality of qualitative research” has been continuously debated. There are many areas of science and technology wherein these debates on the assessment of qualitative research have taken place. Examples include various areas of psychology: general psychology (Madill et al., 2000 ); counseling psychology (Morrow, 2005 ); and clinical psychology (Barker & Pistrang, 2005 ), and other disciplines of social sciences: social policy (Bryman et al., 2008 ); health research (Sparkes, 2001 ); business and management research (Johnson et al., 2006 ); information systems (Klein & Myers, 1999 ); and environmental studies (Reid & Gough, 2000 ). In the literature, these debates are enthused by the impression that the blanket application of criteria for good qualitative research developed around the positivist paradigm is improper. Such debates are based on the wide range of philosophical backgrounds within which qualitative research is conducted (e.g., Sandberg, 2000 ; Schwandt, 1996 ). The existence of methodological diversity led to the formulation of different sets of criteria applicable to qualitative research.

Among qualitative researchers, the dilemma of governing the measures to assess the quality of research is not a new phenomenon, especially when the virtuous triad of objectivity, reliability, and validity (Spencer et al., 2004 ) are not adequate. Occasionally, the criteria of quantitative research are used to evaluate qualitative research (Cohen & Crabtree, 2008 ; Lather, 2004 ). Indeed, Howe ( 2004 ) claims that the prevailing paradigm in educational research is scientifically based experimental research. Hypotheses and conjectures about the preeminence of quantitative research can weaken the worth and usefulness of qualitative research by neglecting the prominence of harmonizing match for purpose on research paradigm, the epistemological stance of the researcher, and the choice of methodology. Researchers have been reprimanded concerning this in “paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences” (Lincoln & Guba, 2000 ).

In general, qualitative research tends to come from a very different paradigmatic stance and intrinsically demands distinctive and out-of-the-ordinary criteria for evaluating good research and varieties of research contributions that can be made. This review attempts to present a series of evaluative criteria for qualitative researchers, arguing that their choice of criteria needs to be compatible with the unique nature of the research in question (its methodology, aims, and assumptions). This review aims to assist researchers in identifying some of the indispensable features or markers of high-quality qualitative research. In a nutshell, the purpose of this systematic literature review is to analyze the existing knowledge on high-quality qualitative research and to verify the existence of research studies dealing with the critical assessment of qualitative research based on the concept of diverse paradigmatic stances. Contrary to the existing reviews, this review also suggests some critical directions to follow to improve the quality of qualitative research in different epistemological and ontological perspectives. This review is also intended to provide guidelines for the acceleration of future developments and dialogues among qualitative researchers in the context of assessing the qualitative research.

The rest of this review article is structured in the following fashion: Sect.  Methods describes the method followed for performing this review. Section Criteria for Evaluating Qualitative Studies provides a comprehensive description of the criteria for evaluating qualitative studies. This section is followed by a summary of the strategies to improve the quality of qualitative research in Sect.  Improving Quality: Strategies . Section  How to Assess the Quality of the Research Findings? provides details on how to assess the quality of the research findings. After that, some of the quality checklists (as tools to evaluate quality) are discussed in Sect.  Quality Checklists: Tools for Assessing the Quality . At last, the review ends with the concluding remarks presented in Sect.  Conclusions, Future Directions and Outlook . Some prospects in qualitative research for enhancing its quality and usefulness in the social and techno-scientific research community are also presented in Sect.  Conclusions, Future Directions and Outlook .

For this review, a comprehensive literature search was performed from many databases using generic search terms such as Qualitative Research , Criteria , etc . The following databases were chosen for the literature search based on the high number of results: IEEE Explore, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. The following keywords (and their combinations using Boolean connectives OR/AND) were adopted for the literature search: qualitative research, criteria, quality, assessment, and validity. The synonyms for these keywords were collected and arranged in a logical structure (see Table 1 ). All publications in journals and conference proceedings later than 1950 till 2021 were considered for the search. Other articles extracted from the references of the papers identified in the electronic search were also included. A large number of publications on qualitative research were retrieved during the initial screening. Hence, to include the searches with the main focus on criteria for good qualitative research, an inclusion criterion was utilized in the search string.

From the selected databases, the search retrieved a total of 765 publications. Then, the duplicate records were removed. After that, based on the title and abstract, the remaining 426 publications were screened for their relevance by using the following inclusion and exclusion criteria (see Table 2 ). Publications focusing on evaluation criteria for good qualitative research were included, whereas those works which delivered theoretical concepts on qualitative research were excluded. Based on the screening and eligibility, 45 research articles were identified that offered explicit criteria for evaluating the quality of qualitative research and were found to be relevant to this review.

Figure  1 illustrates the complete review process in the form of PRISMA flow diagram. PRISMA, i.e., “preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses” is employed in systematic reviews to refine the quality of reporting.

PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the search and inclusion process. N represents the number of records

Criteria for Evaluating Qualitative Studies

Fundamental criteria: general research quality.

Various researchers have put forward criteria for evaluating qualitative research, which have been summarized in Table 3 . Also, the criteria outlined in Table 4 effectively deliver the various approaches to evaluate and assess the quality of qualitative work. The entries in Table 4 are based on Tracy’s “Eight big‐tent criteria for excellent qualitative research” (Tracy, 2010 ). Tracy argues that high-quality qualitative work should formulate criteria focusing on the worthiness, relevance, timeliness, significance, morality, and practicality of the research topic, and the ethical stance of the research itself. Researchers have also suggested a series of questions as guiding principles to assess the quality of a qualitative study (Mays & Pope, 2020 ). Nassaji ( 2020 ) argues that good qualitative research should be robust, well informed, and thoroughly documented.

Qualitative Research: Interpretive Paradigms

All qualitative researchers follow highly abstract principles which bring together beliefs about ontology, epistemology, and methodology. These beliefs govern how the researcher perceives and acts. The net, which encompasses the researcher’s epistemological, ontological, and methodological premises, is referred to as a paradigm, or an interpretive structure, a “Basic set of beliefs that guides action” (Guba, 1990 ). Four major interpretive paradigms structure the qualitative research: positivist and postpositivist, constructivist interpretive, critical (Marxist, emancipatory), and feminist poststructural. The complexity of these four abstract paradigms increases at the level of concrete, specific interpretive communities. Table 5 presents these paradigms and their assumptions, including their criteria for evaluating research, and the typical form that an interpretive or theoretical statement assumes in each paradigm. Moreover, for evaluating qualitative research, quantitative conceptualizations of reliability and validity are proven to be incompatible (Horsburgh, 2003 ). In addition, a series of questions have been put forward in the literature to assist a reviewer (who is proficient in qualitative methods) for meticulous assessment and endorsement of qualitative research (Morse, 2003 ). Hammersley ( 2007 ) also suggests that guiding principles for qualitative research are advantageous, but methodological pluralism should not be simply acknowledged for all qualitative approaches. Seale ( 1999 ) also points out the significance of methodological cognizance in research studies.

Table 5 reflects that criteria for assessing the quality of qualitative research are the aftermath of socio-institutional practices and existing paradigmatic standpoints. Owing to the paradigmatic diversity of qualitative research, a single set of quality criteria is neither possible nor desirable. Hence, the researchers must be reflexive about the criteria they use in the various roles they play within their research community.

Improving Quality: Strategies

Another critical question is “How can the qualitative researchers ensure that the abovementioned quality criteria can be met?” Lincoln and Guba ( 1986 ) delineated several strategies to intensify each criteria of trustworthiness. Other researchers (Merriam & Tisdell, 2016 ; Shenton, 2004 ) also presented such strategies. A brief description of these strategies is shown in Table 6 .

It is worth mentioning that generalizability is also an integral part of qualitative research (Hays & McKibben, 2021 ). In general, the guiding principle pertaining to generalizability speaks about inducing and comprehending knowledge to synthesize interpretive components of an underlying context. Table 7 summarizes the main metasynthesis steps required to ascertain generalizability in qualitative research.

Figure  2 reflects the crucial components of a conceptual framework and their contribution to decisions regarding research design, implementation, and applications of results to future thinking, study, and practice (Johnson et al., 2020 ). The synergy and interrelationship of these components signifies their role to different stances of a qualitative research study.

Essential elements of a conceptual framework

In a nutshell, to assess the rationale of a study, its conceptual framework and research question(s), quality criteria must take account of the following: lucid context for the problem statement in the introduction; well-articulated research problems and questions; precise conceptual framework; distinct research purpose; and clear presentation and investigation of the paradigms. These criteria would expedite the quality of qualitative research.

How to Assess the Quality of the Research Findings?

The inclusion of quotes or similar research data enhances the confirmability in the write-up of the findings. The use of expressions (for instance, “80% of all respondents agreed that” or “only one of the interviewees mentioned that”) may also quantify qualitative findings (Stenfors et al., 2020 ). On the other hand, the persuasive reason for “why this may not help in intensifying the research” has also been provided (Monrouxe & Rees, 2020 ). Further, the Discussion and Conclusion sections of an article also prove robust markers of high-quality qualitative research, as elucidated in Table 8 .

Quality Checklists: Tools for Assessing the Quality

Numerous checklists are available to speed up the assessment of the quality of qualitative research. However, if used uncritically and recklessly concerning the research context, these checklists may be counterproductive. I recommend that such lists and guiding principles may assist in pinpointing the markers of high-quality qualitative research. However, considering enormous variations in the authors’ theoretical and philosophical contexts, I would emphasize that high dependability on such checklists may say little about whether the findings can be applied in your setting. A combination of such checklists might be appropriate for novice researchers. Some of these checklists are listed below:

The most commonly used framework is Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) (Tong et al., 2007 ). This framework is recommended by some journals to be followed by the authors during article submission.

Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) is another checklist that has been created particularly for medical education (O’Brien et al., 2014 ).

Also, Tracy ( 2010 ) and Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP, 2021 ) offer criteria for qualitative research relevant across methods and approaches.

Further, researchers have also outlined different criteria as hallmarks of high-quality qualitative research. For instance, the “Road Trip Checklist” (Epp & Otnes, 2021 ) provides a quick reference to specific questions to address different elements of high-quality qualitative research.

Conclusions, Future Directions, and Outlook

This work presents a broad review of the criteria for good qualitative research. In addition, this article presents an exploratory analysis of the essential elements in qualitative research that can enable the readers of qualitative work to judge it as good research when objectively and adequately utilized. In this review, some of the essential markers that indicate high-quality qualitative research have been highlighted. I scope them narrowly to achieve rigor in qualitative research and note that they do not completely cover the broader considerations necessary for high-quality research. This review points out that a universal and versatile one-size-fits-all guideline for evaluating the quality of qualitative research does not exist. In other words, this review also emphasizes the non-existence of a set of common guidelines among qualitative researchers. In unison, this review reinforces that each qualitative approach should be treated uniquely on account of its own distinctive features for different epistemological and disciplinary positions. Owing to the sensitivity of the worth of qualitative research towards the specific context and the type of paradigmatic stance, researchers should themselves analyze what approaches can be and must be tailored to ensemble the distinct characteristics of the phenomenon under investigation. Although this article does not assert to put forward a magic bullet and to provide a one-stop solution for dealing with dilemmas about how, why, or whether to evaluate the “goodness” of qualitative research, it offers a platform to assist the researchers in improving their qualitative studies. This work provides an assembly of concerns to reflect on, a series of questions to ask, and multiple sets of criteria to look at, when attempting to determine the quality of qualitative research. Overall, this review underlines the crux of qualitative research and accentuates the need to evaluate such research by the very tenets of its being. Bringing together the vital arguments and delineating the requirements that good qualitative research should satisfy, this review strives to equip the researchers as well as reviewers to make well-versed judgment about the worth and significance of the qualitative research under scrutiny. In a nutshell, a comprehensive portrayal of the research process (from the context of research to the research objectives, research questions and design, speculative foundations, and from approaches of collecting data to analyzing the results, to deriving inferences) frequently proliferates the quality of a qualitative research.

Prospects : A Road Ahead for Qualitative Research

Irrefutably, qualitative research is a vivacious and evolving discipline wherein different epistemological and disciplinary positions have their own characteristics and importance. In addition, not surprisingly, owing to the sprouting and varied features of qualitative research, no consensus has been pulled off till date. Researchers have reflected various concerns and proposed several recommendations for editors and reviewers on conducting reviews of critical qualitative research (Levitt et al., 2021 ; McGinley et al., 2021 ). Following are some prospects and a few recommendations put forward towards the maturation of qualitative research and its quality evaluation:

In general, most of the manuscript and grant reviewers are not qualitative experts. Hence, it is more likely that they would prefer to adopt a broad set of criteria. However, researchers and reviewers need to keep in mind that it is inappropriate to utilize the same approaches and conducts among all qualitative research. Therefore, future work needs to focus on educating researchers and reviewers about the criteria to evaluate qualitative research from within the suitable theoretical and methodological context.

There is an urgent need to refurbish and augment critical assessment of some well-known and widely accepted tools (including checklists such as COREQ, SRQR) to interrogate their applicability on different aspects (along with their epistemological ramifications).

Efforts should be made towards creating more space for creativity, experimentation, and a dialogue between the diverse traditions of qualitative research. This would potentially help to avoid the enforcement of one's own set of quality criteria on the work carried out by others.

Moreover, journal reviewers need to be aware of various methodological practices and philosophical debates.

It is pivotal to highlight the expressions and considerations of qualitative researchers and bring them into a more open and transparent dialogue about assessing qualitative research in techno-scientific, academic, sociocultural, and political rooms.

Frequent debates on the use of evaluative criteria are required to solve some potentially resolved issues (including the applicability of a single set of criteria in multi-disciplinary aspects). Such debates would not only benefit the group of qualitative researchers themselves, but primarily assist in augmenting the well-being and vivacity of the entire discipline.

To conclude, I speculate that the criteria, and my perspective, may transfer to other methods, approaches, and contexts. I hope that they spark dialog and debate – about criteria for excellent qualitative research and the underpinnings of the discipline more broadly – and, therefore, help improve the quality of a qualitative study. Further, I anticipate that this review will assist the researchers to contemplate on the quality of their own research, to substantiate research design and help the reviewers to review qualitative research for journals. On a final note, I pinpoint the need to formulate a framework (encompassing the prerequisites of a qualitative study) by the cohesive efforts of qualitative researchers of different disciplines with different theoretic-paradigmatic origins. I believe that tailoring such a framework (of guiding principles) paves the way for qualitative researchers to consolidate the status of qualitative research in the wide-ranging open science debate. Dialogue on this issue across different approaches is crucial for the impending prospects of socio-techno-educational research.

Amin, M. E. K., Nørgaard, L. S., Cavaco, A. M., Witry, M. J., Hillman, L., Cernasev, A., & Desselle, S. P. (2020). Establishing trustworthiness and authenticity in qualitative pharmacy research. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 16 (10), 1472–1482.

Article   Google Scholar  

Barker, C., & Pistrang, N. (2005). Quality criteria under methodological pluralism: Implications for conducting and evaluating research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 35 (3–4), 201–212.

Bryman, A., Becker, S., & Sempik, J. (2008). Quality criteria for quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research: A view from social policy. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11 (4), 261–276.

Caelli, K., Ray, L., & Mill, J. (2003). ‘Clear as mud’: Toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2 (2), 1–13.

CASP (2021). CASP checklists. Retrieved May 2021 from https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/

Cohen, D. J., & Crabtree, B. F. (2008). Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: Controversies and recommendations. The Annals of Family Medicine, 6 (4), 331–339.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–32). Sage Publications Ltd.

Google Scholar  

Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38 (3), 215–229.

Epp, A. M., & Otnes, C. C. (2021). High-quality qualitative research: Getting into gear. Journal of Service Research . https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670520961445

Guba, E. G. (1990). The paradigm dialog. In Alternative paradigms conference, mar, 1989, Indiana u, school of education, San Francisco, ca, us . Sage Publications, Inc.

Hammersley, M. (2007). The issue of quality in qualitative research. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 30 (3), 287–305.

Haven, T. L., Errington, T. M., Gleditsch, K. S., van Grootel, L., Jacobs, A. M., Kern, F. G., & Mokkink, L. B. (2020). Preregistering qualitative research: A Delphi study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19 , 1609406920976417.

Hays, D. G., & McKibben, W. B. (2021). Promoting rigorous research: Generalizability and qualitative research. Journal of Counseling and Development, 99 (2), 178–188.

Horsburgh, D. (2003). Evaluation of qualitative research. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 12 (2), 307–312.

Howe, K. R. (2004). A critique of experimentalism. Qualitative Inquiry, 10 (1), 42–46.

Johnson, J. L., Adkins, D., & Chauvin, S. (2020). A review of the quality indicators of rigor in qualitative research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84 (1), 7120.

Johnson, P., Buehring, A., Cassell, C., & Symon, G. (2006). Evaluating qualitative management research: Towards a contingent criteriology. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8 (3), 131–156.

Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23 (1), 67–93.

Lather, P. (2004). This is your father’s paradigm: Government intrusion and the case of qualitative research in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 10 (1), 15–34.

Levitt, H. M., Morrill, Z., Collins, K. M., & Rizo, J. L. (2021). The methodological integrity of critical qualitative research: Principles to support design and research review. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 68 (3), 357.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986 (30), 73–84.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163–188). Sage Publications.

Madill, A., Jordan, A., & Shirley, C. (2000). Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: Realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. British Journal of Psychology, 91 (1), 1–20.

Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2020). Quality in qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Health Care . https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119410867.ch15

McGinley, S., Wei, W., Zhang, L., & Zheng, Y. (2021). The state of qualitative research in hospitality: A 5-year review 2014 to 2019. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 62 (1), 8–20.

Merriam, S., & Tisdell, E. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, US.

Meyer, M., & Dykes, J. (2019). Criteria for rigor in visualization design study. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 26 (1), 87–97.

Monrouxe, L. V., & Rees, C. E. (2020). When I say… quantification in qualitative research. Medical Education, 54 (3), 186–187.

Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52 (2), 250.

Morse, J. M. (2003). A review committee’s guide for evaluating qualitative proposals. Qualitative Health Research, 13 (6), 833–851.

Nassaji, H. (2020). Good qualitative research. Language Teaching Research, 24 (4), 427–431.

O’Brien, B. C., Harris, I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89 (9), 1245–1251.

O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19 , 1609406919899220.

Reid, A., & Gough, S. (2000). Guidelines for reporting and evaluating qualitative research: What are the alternatives? Environmental Education Research, 6 (1), 59–91.

Rocco, T. S. (2010). Criteria for evaluating qualitative studies. Human Resource Development International . https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2010.501959

Sandberg, J. (2000). Understanding human competence at work: An interpretative approach. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (1), 9–25.

Schwandt, T. A. (1996). Farewell to criteriology. Qualitative Inquiry, 2 (1), 58–72.

Seale, C. (1999). Quality in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 5 (4), 465–478.

Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22 (2), 63–75.

Sparkes, A. C. (2001). Myth 94: Qualitative health researchers will agree about validity. Qualitative Health Research, 11 (4), 538–552.

Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., & Dillon, L. (2004). Quality in qualitative evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence.

Stenfors, T., Kajamaa, A., & Bennett, D. (2020). How to assess the quality of qualitative research. The Clinical Teacher, 17 (6), 596–599.

Taylor, E. W., Beck, J., & Ainsworth, E. (2001). Publishing qualitative adult education research: A peer review perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 33 (2), 163–179.

Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19 (6), 349–357.

Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16 (10), 837–851.

Download references

Open access funding provided by TU Wien (TUW).

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Faculty of Informatics, Technische Universität Wien, 1040, Vienna, Austria

Drishti Yadav

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Drishti Yadav .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Yadav, D. Criteria for Good Qualitative Research: A Comprehensive Review. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 31 , 679–689 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00619-0

Download citation

Accepted : 28 August 2021

Published : 18 September 2021

Issue Date : December 2022

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00619-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Qualitative research
• Evaluative criteria
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Qualitative Research in Psychology

Research Methods in Psychology

January 2023

This twelve-hour course on qualitative research in psychology begins by exploring the historical and cross-disciplinary foundations of the field, emphasizing philosophical underpinnings such as postpositivism, constructivism, transformative, and pragmatism. The course highlights the iterative, naturalistic, and contextual facets of qualitative research, focusing on trustworthiness criteria like credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. It also addresses common critiques from a quantitative perspective and the concept of reflexivity, stressing the importance of the researcher’s role and biases.

Phenomenology, narrative inquiry, and constructivist grounded theory are explored next. Phenomenology captures the essence of human experiences through in-depth interviews, revealing nuances like maternal identity development. Narrative inquiry uses storytelling to uncover life nuances, such as the challenges faced by first-generation college students. Constructivist grounded theory develops theories based on participants’ experiences, explaining social processes like identity development and resilience-building. Interviewing techniques tailored to each tradition are explored, emphasizing the researcher’s role as the core instrument of data collection.

The course then explores ethnographic inquiry and case studies. Ethnography involves direct engagement in the setting of interest, uncovering cultural phenomena through various genres like classical, mainstream, public, and postmodern. Case studies investigate phenomena bounded by time and place, focusing on individuals, interventions, organizations, or systems.

Finally, the course examines qualitative data analysis and coding techniques. The iterative nature of qualitative research is emphasized, where data collection and analysis occur simultaneously, allowing for constant comparison and refinement of codes.

Learning objectives

• Describe the philosophical and interpretive foundations of qualitative research.
• Differentiate qualitative claims, methods, and analyses from quantitative claims, methods, and analyses.
• Explore, identify, and evaluate core qualitative traditions (phenomenology, narrative inquiry, constructivist grounded theory, ethnographic inquiry, and case study).
• Distinguish common methods (e.g., interviewing, focus groups) and analytical techniques (qualitative data analysis) used within and across core qualitative traditions.
• Begin thinking about your own qualitative study of a topic in psychology.

This program does not offer CE credit.

More in this series

A concepts-focused introduction to basic descriptive and inferential statistics

January 2023 On Demand Training

Principles of design and ethics for research in psychology

• Open access
• Published: 02 September 2024

Components of safe nursing care in the intensive care units: a qualitative study

• Mozhdeh Tajari 1 ,
• Tahereh Ashktorab 2 &
• Abbas Ebadi 3  

BMC Nursing volume  23 , Article number:  613 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

Metrics details

Patient safety is a global health issue that affects patients worldwide. Providing safe care in the intensive care units (ICUs) is one of the most crucial tasks for nurses. Numerous factors can impact the capacity of nurses to deliver safe care within ICUs. Consequently, this study was undertaken with the aim of identifying the components of safe nursing care in ICUs.

The current research constitutes a qualitative conventional content analysis study conducted from January 2022 to June 2022. The study participants comprised nurses, intensivists, nurse responsible for patient safety, paramedic, patients, and patients’ family member, totaling 21 individuals selected through purposive sampling. Data collection involved individual, in-depth, and semi-structured interviews. Subsequently, data analysis was performed utilizing the approach outlined by Graneheim and Lundman (Nurse Educ Today 24(2):105–12, 2004), leading to the identification of participants’ perspectives.

Three themes were identified as components of safe nursing care in ICUs. These themes include professional behavior (with categories: Implementation of policies, organizing communication, professional ethics), holistic care (with categories: systematic care, comprehensive care of all systems), and safety-oriented organization (with categories: human resource management and safe environment).

Conclusions

The findings of this study underscore the significance of advocating for safe nursing practices in ICUs by emphasizing professional conduct, holistic care, and safety-focused organizational structures. These results align with existing research, suggesting that by introducing tailored interventions and tactics informed by these elements, a safer environment for nursing care can be established for ICUs patients.

Peer Review reports

One of the most crucial indicatorsof quality care is safety (Atashzadeh Shoorideh et al. [ 1 ]). Safety refers to the prevention of all unintentional or intentional harm, such as injury or death due to adverse medication reactions, patient misidentification, or nosocomial infections by healthcare providers (Butler and Hupp [ 2 ]). Recently defined by the World Health Organization in 2021, patient safety is a framework of organized activities that establish cultures, processes, behaviors, technologies, and environments within healthcare organizations. This framework aims to consistently and effectively identify risks, preventable harm, and reduce the likelihood of their occurrence (Organization [ 3 ]).

Unsafe care has significantly contributed to serious medical accidents worldwide (AL-Mugheed et al. [ 4 ]), and the social cost of patient injuries has been reported to be in the trillions of dollars annually (Organization [ 3 ]). Hospital-acquired serious injuries account for 6% of occupied hospital beds and about 7 million hospital admissions per year (Butler and Hupp [ 2 ]). Evidence shows that patient safety is a global health concern that affects patients worldwide, including both developed and developing countries (Austin et al. [ 5 ]).

Patient safety is even more crucial in intensive care units (ICUs) because they are among the most critical hospital units where nurses play a vital role (Mahmoudi [ 6 ]). In these units, the risk of adverse events is heightened due to factors such as the complexity of the patient’s condition and treatment, the presence of numerous electronic devices and equipment, patients’ lack of awareness, and their reliance on nurses and life-support equipment (Marzban et al. [ 7 ]). Apart from patients, nurses also face unique challenges like high job stress, extended working hours, burnout, dissatisfaction, moral dilemmas, conflicts with patients’ families, and decisions regarding end-of-life care (LeClaire et al. [ 8 ]).

According to a study conducted in Brazil, factors affecting patient safety in relation to nursing staff included the workload of staff, training and professional qualification of staff, teamwork, contractual employment, lack of job security, and destructive behaviors (Oliveira et al. [ 9 ]). In the study by Naderi et al. (Naderi [ 10 ])in Iran, the factors affecting patient safety include human resources status, management and organization, interaction and teamwork, medications, equipment, medical environment, patient-related factors, improving patient quality and safety, importance of documentation, evaluation and monitoring, medical errors, and barriers and challenges (Naderi [ 10 ]). In a study by Lima et al. (D’Lima et al. [ 11 ]), concepts obtained in relation to employee risk perception and patient safety included employee individual factors (sub-theme including pragmatism versus perfectionism), team factors (two sub-themes including team dynamics and interdisciplinary tensions), unit factors (sub-theme including achieving dynamic balance), and organizational factors (sub-theme including risk perception) (D’Lima et al. [ 11 ]). Another study identified factors such as nurse error awareness, nurse well-being, teamwork, non-punitive environment, work management, hospital leadership, and ICU leadership as effective factors for safe ICU care (Garrouste-Orgeas et al. [ 12 ]).

Vaismoradi (Vaismoradi [ 13 ])conducted a grounded theory study in Iran, presenting strategies aimed at enhancing safe care. These strategies encompassed altering attitudes and performance, eliminating organizational obstacles, fostering a culture of teamwork, enhancing the influence of nursing leadership, and cultivating a culture centered on safe nursing care. Furthermore, Vaismoradi emphasized the importance of redefining safe care and conducting guiding research in this domain as highly impactful strategies (Vaismoradi [ 13 ]).

Despite the existing researches in the realm of factors and elements associated with patient safety, a noticeable gap in within high-risk and critical units like ICUs is evident. Through the implementation of more targeted studies, it is possible to pinpoint the components of safe nursing care in ICUs that align with the cultural contexts and healthcare systems of different countries. The outcomes of this research at a micro level of management can serve as valuable resources for the education and training of nursing students and professionals, while at a macro level, they can inform the development and implementation of healthcare policies. Hence, this study was initiated with the aim of identifying the components of safe nursing care in ICUs.

Materials and methods

Study design and setting.

The present study is a conventional content analysis approach, carried out from January 2022 to June 2022. The research was conducted in 8 hospitals affiliated with three medical sciences universities in Tehran, the capital of Iran.

Participants

Through purposive sampling, a total of 21 participants were selected for interviews. The participants included 7 nurses, 2 head nurses, 1 clinical supervisor, 1 nurse responsible for patient safety, 5 intensivists, 2 patients, 1 patient family member (patient’s son), 1 patient safety officer from the Ministry of Health, Treatment, and Medical Education, and 1 paramedic. The initial participant selected for the study was a nurse who met the inclusion criteria, possessed extensive experience, and demonstrated effective communication skills. Subsequent participants were chosen based on the data collected from each participant.

Data collection

In this research, data was gathered through individual, in-depth and semi-structured interviews with individuals who met the specified inclusion criteria. interviews were conducted by the first author and recorded using a mobile device with the participants’ consent.

The inclusion criteria for the healthcare personnel involved having a minimum of two years of professional experience in the ICU or in units associated with patient safety. The selection of the two-year threshold was based on the completion of the mandatory manpower plan course and the acquisition of sufficient experience and knowledge. Patients were included if they had a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 15, demonstrated clear speech abilities, and received approval from the ICU intensivist to participate in the interview.

The researcher took into account the diversity of participants in terms of gender, educational background, job position, and work experience, particularly in relation to the nurses. Data collection persisted until data saturation was achieved, and no new codes emerged. A concluding interview was carried out to confirm data saturation. Field notes were utilized for selecting subsequent samples and extracting the codes. During the initial meeting or telephone conversation, the study’s aims were elucidated to the 21 participants. In a subsequent communication, participants conveyed their decision to either agree or decline participation. Upon agreement, interview schedules were arranged. Notably, only one intensivist declined to participate. All interviews were conducted either at the hospital or the workplace. Prior to interviewing patients, consent was obtained from the intensivist, and schedules were coordinated with the head nurse of ICU to ensure minimal disruption to patient care and treatment processes.

The interviews comprised four parts: initial open questions, main questions, follow-up questions, and closed questions. The formulation of the questions was guided by the interview guide and involved consultation with members of the research team. Subsequently, a pilot interview was carried out to identify any weaknesses, leading to a redesign of the questions (Kallio et al. [ 14 ]) (Table 1 ).

Data analysis

Data analysis was conducted by the research team, which comprised a nursing doctoral student (first author) and two nursing professors (second and third authors). The first author performed the data analysis, whereas the remaining authors reviewed and made revisions to the codes, subcategories, and categories. The analysis procedures were conducted utilizing the conventional content analysis approach, following the guidelines proposed by Graniheim and Lundman (Graneheim and Lundman [ 15 ]).

Preparation phase

During this phase, decontextualization was conducted in the following manner. Initially, the interviews, and field notes were transcribed using Word software and thoroughly reviewed to capture the main idea. Subsequently, the semantic units were identified and coded. It is important to highlight that the participants were assigned names based on the sequence of the interviews to uphold anonymity. For instance, the first participant was designated as number 1, while the final participant was denoted as number 21.

Organizing phase

Through ongoing comparisons of codes and categories and iterative recategorization during the study meetings with the research team members, a total of 1997 codes were initially identified. Subsequently, through a process of reviewing the extracted codes multiple times, eliminating duplicates, and consolidating similar items, the number of codes was ultimately reduced to 1770. Initially, the codes were organized into subcategories, followed by the extraction of categories from the integration of these subcategories. Finally, themes were derived from the integration of categories. Ultimately, a comprehensive definition of the concept under investigation along with its associated structures was provided.

Reporting phase

During this phase, the processes of sampling, data collection, data analysis, and the subsequent results were documented and reported.

Data integrity and robustness

In this study, the trustworthiness of the results was enhanced by considering strategies in line with Lincoln and Guba’s four criteria for qualitative studies (Lincoln and Guba [ 16 ]).

Credibility: The credibility of this study is supported by the extensive experience of the first author in the research topic. She conducted her Master’s thesis on medication errors in critical care units and has accumulated numerous years of experience working in ICU as a nurse and head nurse. The data collection period was appropriately extended to ensure the researcher’s continued involvement in the study process. Participant selection aimed for maximum diversity in age, gender, work experience, and educational level. Data collection methods included in-depth interviews and field notes. The research process was overseen by a doctoral student in nursing with expertise in qualitative research. The interviews and initial coding were reviewed and approved by the participants, with any ambiguities promptly addressed. The complete transcripts of the interviews, along with the coding, were initially forwarded to the primary author. Following the incorporation of the feedback, the revised text was then shared with the secondary author for further input. The process of assigning codes to subcategories, identifying categories, and developing themes was carried out consistently throughout.

Transferability: This criterion pertains to the richness of descriptive data. In an effort to maximize transferability, participants were purposefully selected from various positions and across different ICUs, such as internal medicine, neurology, surgery, and trauma.

Dependability: It was ensured through the utilization of various data collection methods such as interviews and field notes, along with continuous analysis and precise documentation of all analysis stages. As the current research formed part of a doctoral thesis, all research phases, data analyses, and findings were documented in 6-month reports and reviewed by four referees.

Confirmability: To ensure confirmability, the researcher documented their preconceptions about the study subject to separate them and prevent bias. Additionally, during data collection, the researcher refrained from reviewing the findings of related or similar studies.

The Ethical Committee of Tehran Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences, approved the study protocol (IR.IAU.TMU.REC.1399.481). Written informed consent was obtained from all the participant, and data confidentiality was guaranteed in accordance with rules and regulations, and consistent with the requirements of the Ethical Committee that approved the study. The participants were informed about the possible duration of the interviews, the freedom and authority to stop the interview whenever they felt necessary, how to maintain confidentiality of the information, and how the results of the study would be used.

The mean age of the participants in this study was 41.80 years, while the mean work experience of the health care members was 17. 16 years. The demographic characteristics of the participants are delineated in Table  2 .

The average duration of the interviews was 36.42 min, with a maximum duration of 80 min and a minimum duration of 20 min. A total of 1770 codes were extracted and categorized into 43 subcategories. These subcategories were further integrated to form 7 categories, and from these categories, 3 themes were identified (Table  3 ).

• Professional behavior

Participants in this study viewed Implementation of policies, organizing communication with team members, patients, and their families, and adherence to professional ethics as key components of professional behavior.

Implementation of policies

Implementation of policies was identified by all participants as a critical component of ensuring safe care and was frequently emphasized during the interviews. This encompassed various aspects such as appropriate execution of nursing procedure, Safe mechanical ventilation, Safe Medication Administration, Safe blood transfusion, Safe restraint, Proper care of patient connections, pain control, preventing falls, delirium, and deep vein thrombosis, adhering to infection control protocols, ensuring safe patient transfers, and obtaining informed consent. Given the extensive range of subcategories and the constraints on presenting all the details, we will highlight select quotes from a few of these subcategories.

For instance, with regard to the proper execution of protocols, one of the nurses stated:

“Less experienced nurses use the wrong routines of more experienced nurses and this becomes a habit. It is essential to assess the patient, review the doctor’s orders. In certain circumstances, the patient may have specific requirements, such as altering the dressing or removing a drain.” (Participant No. 8).

The nurse responsible for patient safety commented on the importance of safe blood transfusions.

“For blood transfusion, it is ensured that the nurse carefully matches the specifications of the blood bag with the patient’s wristband. Additionally, two nurses verify the blood bag. Patients are monitored regularly during transfusions to detect any side effects. They are also educated about potential side effects of blood transfusions and instructed on appropriate actions to take if such side effects manifest.” (Participant No. 5).

One of the intensivists commented on the inadequate management of the patient’s pain.

“Some nurses administer only muscle relaxants to patients before invasive procedures, which can be distressing. When patients are unable to move but still feel pain, it is crucial for healthcare providers to understand that muscle relaxants should be administered alongside painkillers. Prioritizing pain management for patients should be the primary concern for healthcare professionals.” (Participant No. 4).

One of the patients admitted to the ICU articulated his perception of infection control compliance in the following manner:

“Some nurses frequently disinfected their hands, although we did not observe this practice. It is possible that I overlooked it as well. Even the doctors engage in this behavior. was a doctor who visited the bed adjacent to mine. He touched various surfaces and then proceeded to examine me.” (Participant No 12).

Organizing communication

Participants highlighted various ways in which communication impacts safe nursing care in the ICU. This resulted in the identification of categories stemming from the integration of subcategories such as shift delivery using the ISBAR technique, proper utilization of identification wristbands, accurate documentation, communication with patients, and Inadequate team communication.

For instance, one of the head nurses described her encounter with the ISBAR technique as follows.

“Sometimes in the evening and night shifts, nurses may not follow protocols and not use the ISBAR technique for shift delivery and the next day we find many errors and failures.” (Participant No. 2).

The nurse responsible for patient safety emphasized the importance of proper utilization of identification wristbands.

“The identification wristband plays a crucial role in healthcare settings. Regrettably, there are instances where individuals overlook its significance. One of the key purposes of the wristband is to accurately identify the patient. An incident occurred where a mismatch between the blood bag and the patient’s bracelet led to an incorrect transfusion being administered.” (Participant No. 5).

In relation to inadequate team communication, an intensivist expressed the following viewpoint:

“When the patient had a fever in the middle of the night, the nurse did not report it. Later I found out that she was afraid of waking me up.” (Participant No. 4).

Professional ethics

Participants identified adherence to the principles of professional ethics as a prerequisite and integral part of safe nursing care. This category was formed from the subcategories of respecting patient privacy, human dignity, conscience and professional commitment.

Regarding respecting patient privacy, one of the ICU patients described her experience as follows:

“The first night, the nurses were gentlemen and they were very careful not to make me feel uncomfortable. The blanket was taken off me and I felt that my body was visible. They came to cover my body without me telling them. Or when he wanted to see the operation site, he would just push the blanket aside so that I wouldn’t be tortured. I don’t think anything made me happier at that moment. That’s what security means. It means that I feel.”  (Participant No. 12).

One of the nurses said the following about human dignity:

“When we are safe in the working environment, we are trained and respected by our superiors, we are guided, we do our work correctly and we also provide safe care. But if you are not respected as a person and your health is not protected, you don’t care about that department and that hospital. You just want to finish your shift and leave”. (Participant No. 11).

One of the intensivists commented on Conscience and work commitment as follows:

“A conscientious patient may express his wishes by sighing and moaning and making noise. Or, for example, report to our manager that we are neglecting him, but patients with a low level of consciousness may be neglected. It is up to us and our conscience to provide complete, accurate and correct care. Sometimes doctors and nurses can show inattention and immorality towards these patients”. (Participant No. 18).

• Holistic care

In addition to professional behavior, the participants mentioned other things to ensure the safe nursing care of ICU patients, which led to the formation of this theme with categories of systematic care and comprehensive care of all systems.

Systematic care

The participants were of the opinion that the implementation of the steps of the nursing process is one of the main conditions for the provision of safe care to patients. This category was formed from the subcategories of initial patient assessment, nursing diagnoses, planning, evaluation of care, continuous care and protection from harm and acquired complications.

The patient safety officer in the Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Education commented on the importance of the initial assessment of the patient:

“The initial assessment can lead to the safety of the patient. Whether they have an allergy or not. Whether they are at risk of falling or not. If it is assessed correctly, it can prevent future incidents. and determine the conditions of care. We need to see at what level the patient entered hospital and at what level they should be discharged. The side effects of the medication given to the patient should be reviewed. The nurse should deal with these issues”. (Participant No. 6).

One of the nurses pointed out the importance of care evaluation:

“At the beginning of my career, if the patient was in pain, I would give painkillers and I didn’t care whether the pain was controlled or not. Care evaluation brings reassurance to the patient. It means I go back and see if my care was useful or not”. (Participant No. 1).

One of the nurses with years of experience working in the ICU pointed out the importance of continuity of care:

“In my opinion, less attention is paid to the discussion of continuing care for terminal patients. Most ICU patients, because they are unlikely to return to their lives, often do not receive the necessary care, or it is not provided in a very accurate and safe way. For example, infection control is not followed. Medication administration protocols are not followed, or they may not administer many of the patient's medications. They do not do the gavage on time and say that it has no effect on the treatment. Somehow they let the patient die”. (Participant No. 13).

Comprehensive care of all systems

The participants believed that taking care of all body systems and paying attention to the patient’s body and mind is a guarantee of safe nursing care. This category was formed from the subcategories of respiratory care, digestive and nutritional care, nervous system care, genitourinary care, cardiovascular and haemodynamic care, skin and mucous membrane care, and attention to the mental, psychological and emotional state of the patient.

In terms of respiratory care, one of the expert nurses describes his performance as follows :

“I listen to the patient’s breathing at the very beginning of the shift. I look for the presence of distress in the patient. Whether he has rales or not. The chest is bilateral. And it goes up and down symmetrically. I look at the results of the ABG and even the colour and type of secretions. Because the change in the colour of the secretions can be due to pneumonia”. (Participant No. 7).

One of the head nurses also said about genitourinary care:

“Sometimes when a patient has oliguria, the nurse does not analyse to understand the cause of the oliguria. She quickly gives the patient furosemide. I have seen a lot of inexperienced staff. I tell them about the catheter route first and check the condition of the bladder. Then I check the amount of fluids given and the patient’s CVP. Then check the status of medications and tests. Finally, I report it to the intensivist doctor for a tell order or a I request to visit the patient. Don’t go to the last treatment first”. (Participant No. 2).

One of the patients also mentioned that paying attention to the mental, psychological and emotional state of the patient and their family is an important part of safe care:

“In those first moments I was scared and anxious because the nurse’s words and explanations were very good and calmed me down. After two days of feeling better, I really wanted to see my partner. Seeing my wife was more important to me than anything else. My heart was broken. Everything made me cry. But seeing my wife gave me peace. Even though it was short. I don’t know. Why did some allow it and others didn’t? I don’t know if it’s legal or not, but it seems to be a matter of taste”. (Participant No. 12).

Safety oriented organization

Participants believe that nurses’ efforts to provide safe care to patients depend on a safety focused organization. This content consists of human resource management and safe environment categories.

Human resource management

Employing qualified human resources, monitoring the performance of human resources, error reporting and control, arrangement of human resources, sufficient human resources supply, Providing general and specific training to human resources.

This category was formed from the subcategories of employing qualified human resources, monitoring the performance of human resources, error reporting and control, arrangement of human resources, sufficient human resources supply, Providing general and specific training to human resources..

Regarding the employing qualified human resources, the nurse responsible for patient safety said:

“We have a selection committee that asks questions of the nurses. Once they are accepted, the training starts. Ten hours of important safety and infection control instructions and report writing. We train them and then they go through 70 h of training under the supervision of the ICU supervisor. The supervisor fills in three checklists for each nurse, covering behavioral, general and specialist skills, and sends them to us. If he gets the required number of points, he starts work, otherwise the training has to be repeated”. (Participant No. 5).

The statement of one of the nurses regarding the arrangement of human resources was as follows:

“If I am in charge of the shift, I will divide the work carefully and I will try to arrange it in such a way that it is fair and each nurse has both patient with lots of work and with little work. Not that a nurse should have "two busy patients or two patients with little work”. I try not to give complicated patients to new and inexperienced nurses who cannot manage the patient”. (Participant No. 10).

One of the nurses, related to the sufficient human resources supply, said:

“Nurses’ salaries are paid late, their salaries are not commensurate with their work. There is no justice in the workplace, there is discrimination. There is job dissatisfaction. There is little encouragement and a lot of punishment. All of this prevents safe patient care. Besides, the nurse loses her motivation. That’s why I want to leave.”  (Participant No. 13).

Safe environment

This category was formed from the subcategories of safe equipment and safe structure.

With regard to safe equipment, the patient safety officer in the Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Education said:

“To provide safe care, the equipment must be safe. And then we expect safe care from the nurse. If our bed is not safe, how can we expect the nurse to prevent falls? If we have a lack of wavy mattress , how can we expect nurses to prevent pressure sores?”  (Participant No. 6).

Also, the statement of the nurse responsible for patient safety regarding the safe structure was as follows:

“The patient’s safety must be ensured from the moment they arrive at the hospital. From the elevators and the stairs to the door and the wall, etc . In the ICU, the conditions are more specific. In our hospital’s intensive care unit, one of the beds is placed in a corner where the nurse cannot see it. They always put an extra bed in front of this unit. Every time a patient has a CPR code in that unit, it takes a few minutes to remove the extra bed and bring the crash cart into the unit. Exactly, the golden time of CPR is lost”. (Participant No. 5).

The participants in this study have delineated the components of safe nursing care in the ICUs through the aforementioned scenarios. Consequently, drawing from the outcomes of this investigation, safe nursing care can be delineated as follows: Safe nursing care in the ICU is characterized by a holistic care that encompasses systematic and comprehensive care. In delivering such care, nurses exhibit professional behavior by implementation of policies, organizing communication with patients and peers, and upholding professional ethics. In a safety-oriented organization, safe nursing care is evidenced by the establishment of a safe environment and the effective management of human resources.

The present study was conducted with the aim of identifying the components of safe nursing care in the ICUs. Three themes were identified: professional behavior, systematic care, and safety-oriented organization. In this section, the results are compared and discussed with other studies.

The theme of professional behavior emerged by combining the categories implementation of policies, organizing communication, and professional ethics. The participants believe that safe care depends not only on following policies but also on adhering to the principles of professional ethics and organizing communication with all team members and patients.

In term of implementation of policies, Williams et al. concluded that adherence to guidelines can lead to faster diagnosis of sepsis (Williams [ 17 ]), and improves patient safety in medication prescribing (Nouhi et al. [ 18 ]). The results of the study by Santos et al. (Santos [ 19 ]) in Brazil showed that adherence to clinical guidelines leads to better outcomes in patient restraint, positive effect on pain and delirium (Carrothers et al. [ 20 ]; , Thomas et al. [ 21 ]), prevention of falls (Tuma et al. [ 22 ]), and prevention of deep vein thrombosis (Malhotra et al. [ 23 ]). However, it has been argued that adherence to guidelines may jeopardize the autonomy of the nurse, and the nurse may not be able to manage the situation effectively at times not foreseen in the guidelines (Barnard [ 24 ]). For this reason, it seems that, in addition to following the established guidelines, the nurse should have creativity and decision-making power, and be able to identify and prepare for possible out-of-procedure cases for the implementation of each procedure. In the present study, pain control was identified as one of the factors of safe care in the ICU, and most of the participants repeatedly mentioned the pain experience of patients hospitalized in the ICU; in the study conducted in the United States, more than 50% of patients on mechanical ventilation had experienced pain (Fink et al. [ 25 ]). However, in a Norwegian study, only 10% of ICU patients reported pain at rest and 27% reported pain during repositioning (Olsen et al. [ 26 ]). This discrepancy may be due to differences in facilities, equipment, quality of drugs, pain control protocols and nursing methods. It appears that many of the subcategories identified in the professional behavior theme as components of safe care have been introduced and confirmed in other studies. And the results of this study support the previous findings. However, it should be noted that the identification of these components does not necessarily guarantee their implementation, and their implementation requires multilateral planning. For example, despite the importance of safe drug therapy, Ateshzadeh et al. (Atashzadeh Shoorideh et al. [ 1 ])) showed that the level of compliance with drug administration standards was only 2.6% in hospitals under the University of Medical Sciences A in Tehran and 9.4% in hospitals under the University of Medical Sciences B (Atashzadeh Shoorideh et al. [ 1 ]). Regarding infection control, Randa et al. showed that nurses’ performance in hand washing, wearing gowns, gloves and masks was far from the standards (Randa et al. [ 27 ]). Another study found that only 10.83% of nurses avoided incorrect connections (Bayatmanesh et al. [ 28 ]).

The results of this study showed that organizing communication between nurses and other members of the care team is as effective as implementing policies. Haddeland et al. (Haddeland et al. [ 29 ])in Norway demonstrated the importance and need to improve the use of the ISBAR tool to improve patient safety. They concluded that it is essential that healthcare professionals work together to ensure that everyone has the same situational awareness and that good clinical practice is developed and maintained. Correct use of identification wristbands (Barbosa et al. [ 30 ]), accurate recording of all information related to investigations, interventions and their evaluation (Aldawood et al. [ 31 ]), and communication with the patient (Danis [ 32 ])are effective in improving patient safety. The results of the present study are supported by previous studies. In Iran, Abdi et al. (Abdi et al. [ 33 ])concluded that poor communication and lack of team spirit had a negative impact on patient safety (Abdi et al. [ 33 ]). In Saudi Arabia, Al-Dawood et al. (Aldawood et al. [ 31 ])showed that poor team communication was one of the barriers to reducing patient safety in the ICU. Ensuring effective communication is critical to maintaining patient safety and can be achieved by implementing standard communication protocols, providing regular training and education on effective communication, and promoting a culture of collaboration and teamwork (Muller et al. [ 34 ]). Despite the importance of communication to patient safety, the results of evaluations in Iran are disappointing. A review study by Moghadam et al. (Moghadam et al. [ 35 ]), which surveyed Iranian hospitals on the implementation of mandatory patient safety standards, found that the implementation of mandatory standards in the area of ‘interaction with patients and society’ received the lowest score.

According to the results of this research, the principles of professional ethics are necessary to ensure patient safety. The results of studies have shown that things such as respect for privacy (Timmins et al. [ 36 ]), respect for human dignity and worth (Sugarman [ 37 ]; , Smith and Cole [ 38 ]), conscience (Herzer and Pronovost [ 39 ])and professional commitment (Teng et al. [ 40 ]; , Al-Hamdan et al. [ 41 ])are the principles of safe care. The results of the study by Mohammadi et al. (Mohammadi [ 42 ]) in Iran on safe care in ICUs and its relationship with moral courage showed that there is a significant relationship between moral courage and the principles of safe care. In line with previous studies, the present study showed that professional ethics is an important component of safe care in ICUs.

The present study identified holistic care as another effective factor in providing safe care. Holistic care is the systematic and comprehensive care of all systems of the patient’s body. These findings support previous research highlighting the importance of systems thinking and safe care in improving patient safety and overall quality of care (Moazez et al. [ 43 ]). Based on the findings of the study by Wick et al. (Wick et al. [ 44 ]), comprehensive care that addresses the physical, emotional, social and spiritual needs of patients was introduced as a solution to improve outcomes and patient satisfaction. In the study on the design of safe nursing care tools by Rashvand et al. (Rashvand et al. [ 45 ]), attention to the physical needs and attention to the psychological needs of patients were introduced as the main factors of safe nursing care. In addition to the aforementioned studies, the findings of this study are consistent with the holistic and widely used theories in nursing. These include Martha Rogers’ theory, Margaret Newman’s theory and Watson’s theory. A comprehensive review of holistic theories shows that holistic nursing is a two-way human relationship process in which the nurse is attentive, purposeful and alert in the process of caring for the patient as a whole. The result is an improvement in the nurse’s and patient’s sense of wellbeing, quality of care and ultimately patient safety (Yazdi and Talebi [ 46 ]).

In addition to the cases mentioned, the results of this study show the importance of promoting safe care in ICUs through a safety-oriented organizational approach. The creation of a safe environment is also directly related to the safety of the structure and the provision of safe equipment. In line with the present study, Naderi et al. (Naderi [ 10 ])also introduced in their study the state of human resources, management and organization, interaction and teamwork, equipment, environment, and evaluation and monitoring as the main factors affecting patient safety in the hospital (Naderi [ 10 ]). In the study by Lima et al. (D’Lima et al. [ 11 ]), organizational factors were identified as a threat to patient safety. This means that when employees perceive a risk from the organization, they stop providing safe care to patients. In Oliveira et al.’s study (Oliveira et al. [ 9 ]), employee workload, training and professional qualifications, teamwork, contractual employment, lack of job security and disruptive behavior were introduced as factors that interfere with patient safety. In the theoretical model of safe care presented by Vaismoradi (Vaismoradi [ 13 ]) the removal of organizational barriers was identified as one of the strategies to improve patient safety . Thus, based on the results of the present study and other studies, it can be said that healthcare organizations play an important role in patient safety.

Research limitations

One of the limitations of the current study was the absence of theories related to patient safety, which compelled the researchers to resort to the conventional content analysis method.

Another limitation was the lack of specific studies in ICU departments, which made it difficult to compare the present study with similar studies.

In the present study, despite the use of observations and field notes, the primary method of data collection was interviewing the participants. In future studies, incorporating other data collection methods can enhance the depth of the study.

The researcher’s extensive background in working in the intensive care unit as a nurse and head nurse, along with their familiarity with non-safe care practices, posed a risk of introducing bias. To mitigate this bias during the interviews, the researcher endeavored to adopt a listening role and formulate questions in accordance with the interview guide.

A significant portion of the patients admitted to the ICU did not qualify for inclusion in the study as a result of their diminished level of consciousness, reliance on mechanical ventilation, and administration of sedative and hypnotic medications. Identifying suitable participants proved challenging, necessitating extensive consultations and diligent follow-up by the researcher.

Patients exhibited caution in sharing their negative experiences due to concerns about potential repercussions from staff. Building trust to encourage open communication without self-censorship proved to be a lengthy endeavor. In addition, in one particular case, the patient expressed concern about the proximity of her bed to the nursing station, fearing that her conversations would be overheard by the nursing staff. Consequently, in adherence to the patient’s comfort and in consultation with the anesthesiologist, the interview was relocated to a different room to ensure confidentiality and optimal clinical conditions.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the associated restrictions on patient visits, access to the patient’s family was difficult. The researcher had to make several attempts to make appointments for interviews.

The provision of safe care in the ICU is influenced by various components. According to the findings of this study, nurses exhibit professional behavior, such as implementation of policies, organizing communication with team members, patients, and their families, and adherence to professional ethics. They also demonstrate holistic care by following the nursing process and considering the entire system. Conversely, healthcare organizations play a crucial role in ensuring safe care by providing appropriate equipment and maintaining environmental safety. A safety-focused organization can enhance the delivery of safe care to patients in the ICU by offering a secure environment and reliable equipment. This not only ensures patient safety but also boosts staff efficiency, reduces error risks, and ultimately enhances patient outcomes and overall care quality. Healthcare organizations can establish conditions for safe patient care by recruiting suitable staff, monitoring their performance, and addressing their training requirements. Competent nurses, through the provision of comprehensive and systematic care, can deliver safe and high-quality services to patients. It is imperative to emphasize that achieving the desired outcomes necessitates collaborative efforts among healthcare organizations, nurses, and other healthcare professionals.

Availability of data and materials

Due to university policies, the datasets generated and utilized for the present study are not publically accessible but are available from the corresponding author upon justifiable request.

Abbreviations

Intensive Care Unit

Glasgow Coma Score

Identify, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation

Atashzadeh Shoorideh F, Shirinabadi Farahani A, Pishgooie AH, Babaie M, Hadi N, Beheshti M, et al. A comparative study of patient safety in the intensive care units. Nurs Open. 2022;9(5):2381–9.

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Butler GA, Hupp DS. Pediatric quality and safety: a nursing perspective. Pediatr Clin. 2016;63(2):329–39. 2. Flott K, Fontana G, Darzi A. The global state of patient safety. London: Imperial College London; 2019.

Google Scholar  

Organization WHO. Global patient safety action plan 2021–2030: towards eliminating avoidable harm in health care. World Health Organization; 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/integrated-health-services/patient-safety/policy/global-patient-safety-action-plan . Last accessed 26 Jul 2023.

AL-Mugheed K, Bayraktar N, Al-Bsheish M, AlSyouf A, Jarrar MT, AlBaker W, Aldhmadi BK. Patient safety attitudes among doctors and nurses: associations with workload, adverse events, experience. Healthcare. 2022;10(4):631.

Austin JM, D’Andrea G, Birkmeyer JD, Leape LL, Milstein A, Pronovost PJ, et al. Safety in numbers: the development of Leapfrog’s composite patient safety score for US hospitals. J Patient Saf. 2014;10(1):64–71.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Mahmoudi Rad G, Hassani SN. Relationship between organizational commitment and burnout of nurses working in Valiasr Hospital of Birjand in 2011. Modern Care J. 2013;10(4) (Persian).

Marzban S MM, Pour AN, Jahangiri K. Assessment of patient safety management system in ICU. Qazvin Univ Med Sci. 2013;17(5):47–55.

LeClaire MM, Poplau S, Prasad K, Audi C, Freese R, Linzer M. Low ICU burnout in a safety net hospital. Crit Care Explor. 2019;1(5):e0014.

Oliveira RM, Leitao IMTdA, Aguiar LL, Oliveira ACdS, Gazos DM, Silva LMSd, et al. Evaluating the intervening factors in patient safety: focusing on hospital nursing staff. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2015;49:104–13.

Naderi S, Zaboli R, Khalesi N, Nasiripour AA. Factors affecting patient safety: a qualitative content analysis. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2019;33(2):73–80.

D’Lima DM, Murray EJ, Brett SJ. Perceptions of risk and safety in the ICU: a qualitative study of cognitive processes relating to staffing. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(1):60.

Garrouste-Orgeas M, Flaatten H, Moreno R. Understanding medical errors and adverse events in ICU patients. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:107–9.

Vaismoradi M. Exploration of the process of the development of a theoretical model of safe nursing care. Tehran: Doctoral dissertation, Facalty of nursing and midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences; 2012. (Persian).

Kallio H, Pietilä AM, Johnson M, Kangasniemi M. Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. J Adv Nurs. 2016;72(12):2954–65.

Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–12.

Article   PubMed   CAS   Google Scholar  

Lincoln YS, Guba EG. But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New directions for program evaluation. 1986;30:73–84.

Article   Google Scholar  

Williams D. Clinical practice guideline for early identification of sepsis in the emergency: Walden university, proQuest dissertations & theses, 2021. 28775468. Available from: https://www.proquest.com/openview/58144455fbd28a0728d1a6512b8836ee/1?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y . Accessed 18 July 2023.

Nouhi E, Dehbanizadeh A, Zoladl M, Saeedi K, Paghan A. Error Reporting among Nurses Working at Yasuj Shahid Beheshti Hospital in 2014. Iran J Nurs. 2016;29(101):33–42.

Santos GFd, Oliveira EG, Souza RCS. Good practices for physical restraint in intensive care units: integrative review. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2021;74:1–8.

Carrothers KM, Barr J, Spurlock B, Ridgely MS, Damberg CL, Ely EW. Contextual issues influencing implementation and outcomes associated with an integrated approach to managing pain, agitation, and delirium in adult ICUs. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(9):S128–35.

Thomas M, Dhanani S, Irwin D, Writer H, Doherty D. Development, dissemination and implementation of a sedation and analgesic guideline in a pediatric intensive care unit... it takes creativity and collaboration. Dynamics. 2010;21(4):16–25.

PubMed   Google Scholar  

Tuma MA, Acerra JR, El-Menyar A, Al-Thani H, Al-Hassani A, Recicar JF, et al. Epidemiology of workplace-related fall from height and cost of trauma care in Qatar. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2013;3(1):3.

Malhotra AK, Goldberg SR, McLay L, Martin NR, Wolfe LG, Levy MM, et al. DVT surveillance program in the ICU: analysis of cost-effectiveness. PLoS One. 2014;9(9): e106793.

Barnard J. Clinical decision-making by acute medicine advanced nurse practitioners: Sheffield Hallam university, proQuest dissertations & theses, 2019. 28073660. Available from: https://www.proquest.com/openview/ced5036cdc1bd5e65dea0351ef2f621d/1?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y . Accessed 24 June 2023.

Fink RM, Makic MBF, Poteet AW, Oman KS. The ventilated patient’s experience. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2015;34(5):301–8.

Olsen BF, Valeberg BT, Jacobsen M, Småstuen MC, Puntillo K, Rustøen T. Pain in intensive care unit patients—a longitudinal study. Nurs Open. 2021;8(1):224–31.

Randa MFM, Ahamed M, Aziz AAE. Improving nurses’ compliance with standard precautions of infection control in pediatric critical care units. World J Nurs Sci. 2014;3:1–9.

Bayatmanesh H, Zagheri Tafreshi M, Manoochehri H, Akbarzadeh BA. Patient safety observation by nurses working in the intensive care units of selected hospitals affiliated to Yasuj University of Medical Sciences. Iran South Med J. 2019;21(6):493–506.

Haddeland K, Marthinsen GN, Söderhamn U, Flateland SM, Moi EM. Experiences of using the ISBAR tool after an intervention: a focus group study among critical care nurses and anaesthesiologists. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2022;70: 103195.

Barbosa TP, Oliveira GAAd, Lopes MNdA, Poletti NAA, Beccaria LM. Care practices for patient safety in an intensive care unit. Acta Paul Enferm. 2014;27:243–8.

Aldawood F, Kazzaz Y, AlShehri A, Alali H, Al-Surimi K. Enhancing teamwork communication and patient safety responsiveness in a paediatric intensive care unit using the daily safety huddle tool. BMJ Open Qual. 2020;9(1):e000753.

Danis C. The role of rapid response nurses in improving patient safety: University of California, Davis ProQuest dissertations & theses, 2019. 13811446. Available from: https://www.proquest.com/openview/2f9357ba7b41877b15ab1cd516d5bda5/1?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y . Accessed 14 Sept 2023.

Abdi Z, Delgoshaei B, Ravaghi H, Abbasi M, Heyrani A. The culture of patient safety in an Iranian intensive care unit. J Nurs Manag. 2015;23(3):333–45.

Muller M, Jurgens J, Redaelli M, Klingberg K, Hautz WE, Stock S. Impact of the communication and patient hand-off tool SBAR on patient safety: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2018;8(8): e022202.

Moghadam MN, Ismaili MRA, Tavakoli MR. Investigating the situation of Iranian hospitals in terms of implementing mandatory patient safety standards: a systematic review. Iran J Public Health. 2022;51(8):1766.

Timmins F, Parissopoulos S, Plakas S, Naughton MT, De Vries JM, Fouka G. Privacy at end of life in ICU: a review of the literature. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(11–12):2274–84.

Sugarman J. Toward treatment with respect and dignity in the intensive care unit. Narrative inquiry in bioethics. 2015;5(1):1A-4A.

Smith JR, Cole FS. Patient safety: effective interdisciplinary teamwork through simulation and debriefing in the neonatal ICU. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2009;21(2):163–79.

Herzer KR, Pronovost PJ. Motivating physicians to improve quality: light the intrinsic fire. Am J Med Qual. 2014;29(5):451–3.

Teng CI, Dai YT, Lotus Shyu YI, Wong MK, Chu TL, Tsai YH. Professional commitment, patient safety, and patient-perceived care quality. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2009;41(3):301–9.

Al-Hamdan ZM, Dalky H, Al-Ramadneh J. Nurses’ professional commitment and its effect on patient safety. Global J Health Sci. 2017;10(1):111.

Mohammadi F, Tehranineshat B, Ghasemi A, Bijani M. A study of how moral courage and moral sensitivity correlate with safe care in special care nursing. Scientific World Journal. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9097995 .

Moazez M, Miri S, Foroughameri G, Farokhzadian J. Nurses’ perceptions of systems thinking and safe nursing care: a cross-sectional study. J Nurs Manag. 2020;28(4):822–30 (Persian).

Wick EC, Galante DJ, Hobson DB, Benson AR, Lee KH, Berenholtz SM, et al. Organizational culture changes result in improvement in patient-centered outcomes: implementation of an integrated recovery pathway for surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221(3):669–77 quiz 785-6.

Rashvand FEA, Vaismoradi M, Salsali M. Designing and validation of safe nursing care assessment tool: a sequential exploratory mixed-methods design. Tehran: Tehran University of Medical Sciences; 2015. (Persian).

Yazdi K, Talebi R. Holistic nursing from the Dossey’s theory of integral nursing lens: a narrative review study. J Nurs Educ. 2023;12(1):88–103 (Persian).

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present study is part of the findings of the doctoral thesis, which was completed after obtaining the necessary permissions from Tehran Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences. The research team would like to thank the staff of this university and all the participants in this research.

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Mozhdeh Tajari

Department of Management, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Tahereh Ashktorab

Nursing Care Research Center, Clinical Sciences Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR, Iran

Abbas Ebadi

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

M.T, T.A and A.E contributed in study design. M.T contributed in data collection and wrote the manuscript. T.A, and A.E analyzed the data and revised the manuscript. All of the authors proved the final version of manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tahereh Ashktorab .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

The Ethical Committee of Tehran Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences, approved the study protocol (IR.IAU.TMU.REC.1399.481). Written informed consent was obtained from all of the participants, and data confidentiality was guaranteed in accordance with rules and regulations, and consistent with the requirements of the Ethical Committee that approved the study. The participants were informed about the possible duration of the interviews, the freedom and authority to stop the interview whenever they felt necessary, how to maintain confidentiality of the information, and how the results of the study would be used.

Consent for publication

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Tajari, M., Ashktorab, T. & Ebadi, A. Components of safe nursing care in the intensive care units: a qualitative study. BMC Nurs 23 , 613 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02281-5

Download citation

Received : 27 April 2024

Accepted : 21 August 2024

Published : 02 September 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02281-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Patient safety
• Safety-oriented organization

BMC Nursing

ISSN: 1472-6955

• General enquiries: [email protected]

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis for understanding the interactive effects of good governance practices and ceo profiles on esg performance.

1. Introduction

2. literature review, 2.1. attributes included in the ggc and esg performance, 2.2. csr committee and esg performance, 2.3. ceo profile and esg performance, 3. materials and methods, 3.2. variables, 3.3. methodology, 4.1. descriptive statistics and correlation analysis, 4.2. contrarian case analysis, 4.3. analysis of necessary conditions, 4.4. sufficiency analysis for high esg performance, 4.5. bundles of corporate governance practices, 4.6. sufficiency analysis for non-high esg performance, 4.7. robustness analysis for sufficiency, 5. discussion, 5.1. csr committee as the critical component, 5.2. the complementary relationship between the creation of a csr committee and high ggc compliance, 5.3. the substituted relationship between ceo duality and ceo tenure, 5.4. the relative importance of antecedent conditions configuring corporate governance bundles to improve e-s-g practices, 5.5. contributions and implications, 5.6. limitations and future directions, 6. conclusions, author contributions, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

Click here to enlarge figure

• Harjoto, M.; Laksmana, I.; Lee, R. Board Diversity and Corporate Social Responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 2015 , 132 , 641–660. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Burke, J.J.; Hoitash, R.; Hoitash, U. The Heterogeneity of Board-Level Sustainability Committees and Corporate Social Performance. J. Bus. Ethics 2019 , 154 , 1161–1186. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• OECD. G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023 ; OECD: Paris, France, 2023; ISBN 9789264451681. [ Google Scholar ]
• European Parliament and of the Council Directive 2022/2464/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 Amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as Regards Corporate Sustainability Reporting. Off. J. Eur. Union 2022 , L 322 , 15–80.
• CNMV. Unified Good Governance Code of Listed Companies ; Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores: Madrid, Spain, 2006; Available online: https://www.cnmv.es/DocPortal/Publicaciones/CodigoGov/Codigo_unificado_Ing_04en.pdf (accessed on 17 April 2024).
• CNMV. Good Governance Code of Listed Companies ; Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores: Madrid, Spain, 2020; Available online: https://www.cnmv.es/DocPortal/Publicaciones/CodigoGov/CBG_2020_ENen.PDF (accessed on 17 April 2024).
• Villalba-Ríos, P.; Barroso-Castro, C.; Vecino-Gravel, J.D. The Influence of CEO Profile on Corporate Social Responsibility Companies. A Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2022 , 29 , 356–366. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Endrikat, J.; de Villiers, C.; Guenther, T.W.; Guenther, E.M. Board Characteristics and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Meta-Analytic Investigation. Bus. Soc. 2021 , 60 , 2099–2135. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zaman, R.; Jain, T.; Samara, G.; Jamali, D. Corporate Governance Meets Corporate Social Responsibility: Mapping the Interface. Bus. Soc. 2022 , 61 , 690–752. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yang, Z.; Na, J.; Dong, X. Corporate Governance for Sustainable Development: A Study on Mechanism Configuration. J. Clean. Prod. 2024 , 458 , 142509. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lewellyn, K.; Muller-Kahle, M. ESG Leaders or Laggards? A Configurational Analysis of ESG Performance. Bus. Soc. 2023 , 63 , 1149–1202. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jain, T.; Jamali, D. Looking Inside the Black Box: The Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 2016 , 24 , 253–273. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zaman, R.; Nadeem, M.; Carvajal, M. Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Synergies: Evidence from New Zealand. Meditari Account. Res. 2020 , 29 , 135–160. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Aguilera, R.V.; Desender, K.A.; de Castro, L.R.K. A Bundle Perspective to Comparative Corporate Governance. In The SAGE Handbook of Corporate Governance ; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2012. [ Google Scholar ]
• Saridakis, C.; Angelidou, S.; Woodside, A.G. What Type of CSR Engagement Suits My Firm Best? Evidence from an Abductively-Derived Typology. J. Bus. Res. 2020 , 108 , 174–187. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bolourian, S.; Alinaghian, L.; Angus, A. Exploring the Role of Board-Level Corporate Social Responsibility Committees in Corporate Social Responsibility Performance: A Configurational Approach. J. Bus. Res. 2023 , 169 , 114280. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jensen, M.C.; Meckling, W.H. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. J. Financ. Econ. 1976 , 3 , 305–360. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jizi, M.; Salama, A.; Dixon, R.; Stratling, R. Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from the US Banking Sector. J. Bus. Ethics 2014 , 125 , 601–615. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pfeffer, J.; Salancik, G. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective ; Stanford Business Press: Stanford, CA, USA, 1978; ISBN 080474789X. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bear, S.; Rahman, N.; Post, C. The Impact of Board Diversity and Gender Composition on Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Reputation. J. Bus. Ethics 2010 , 97 , 207–221. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Freeman, R.E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1984. [ Google Scholar ]
• Jamali, D.; Safieddine, A.M.; Rabbath, M. Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Synergies and Interrelationships. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 2008 , 16 , 443–459. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Konrad, A.M.; Kramer, V.; Erkut, S. Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organ. Dyn. 2008 , 37 , 145–164. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hambrick, D.C.; Mason, P.A. Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1984 , 9 , 193. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Haniffa, R.M.; Cooke, T.E. The Impact of Culture and Governance on Corporate Social Reporting. J. Account. Public Policy 2005 , 24 , 391–430. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Oh, W.-Y.; Chang, Y.K.; Jung, R. Experience-Based Human Capital or Fixed Paradigm Problem? CEO Tenure, Contextual Influences, and Corporate Social (Ir)Responsibility. J. Bus. Res. 2018 , 90 , 325–333. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nguyen, L.T.M.; Nguyen, P.T. The Board Profiles That Promote Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure–Evidence from S&P 500 Firms. Financ. Res. Lett. 2023 , 55 , 103925. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dwekat, A.; Seguí-Mas, E.; Zaid, M.A.A.; Tormo-Carbó, G. Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility: Mapping the Most Critical Drivers in the Board Academic Literature. Meditari Account. Res. 2022 , 30 , 1705–1739. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ponomareva, Y.; Federo, R.; Aguilera, R.V.; Collin, S. The Cost of Conformity to Good Governance: Board Design and Compensation. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 2022 , 30 , 399–420. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Harjoto, M.; Jo, H. Corporate Governance and CSR Nexus. J. Bus. Ethics 2011 , 100 , 45–67. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hillman, A.J.; Withers, M.C.; Collins, B.J. Resource Dependence Theory: A Review. J. Manag. 2009 , 35 , 1404–1427. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Khan, A.; Muttakin, M.B.; Siddiqui, J. Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures: Evidence from an Emerging Economy. J. Bus. Ethics 2013 , 114 , 207–223. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ibrahim, N.A.; Howard, D.P.; Angelidis, J.P. Board Members in the Service Industry: An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation and Directorial Type. J. Bus. Ethics 2003 , 47 , 393–401. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Majeed, S.; Aziz, T.; Saleem, S. The Effect of Corporate Governance Elements on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure: An Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies at KSE Pakistan. Int. J. Financ. Stud. 2015 , 3 , 530–556. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Katmon, N.; Mohamad, Z.Z.; Norwani, N.M.; Farooque, O. Al Comprehensive Board Diversity and Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from an Emerging Market. J. Bus. Ethics 2019 , 157 , 447–481. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Huang, S.; Hilary, G. Zombie Board: Board Tenure and Firm Performance. J. Account. Res. 2018 , 56 , 1285–1329. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Commission of the European Communities. Commission Recommendation of 15 February 2005 on the Role of Non-Executive or Supervisory Directors of Listed Companies and on the Committees of the (Supervisory) Board. Off. J. Eur. Union 2005 , L 52 , 51–63.
• Radu, C.; Smaili, N. Alignment Versus Monitoring: An Examination of the Effect of the CSR Committee and CSR-Linked Executive Compensation on CSR Performance. J. Bus. Ethics 2022 , 180 , 145–163. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Baraibar-Diez, E.; Odriozola, M.D. CSR Committees and Their Effect on ESG Performance in UK, France, Germany, and Spain. Sustainability 2019 , 11 , 5077. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gennari, F.; Salvioni, D. CSR Committees on Boards: The Impact of the External Country Level Factors. J. Manag. Gov. 2019 , 23 , 759–785. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Michelon, G.; Parbonetti, A. The Effect of Corporate Governance on Sustainability Disclosure. J. Manag. Gov. 2012 , 16 , 1–33. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chams, N.; García-Blandón, J. Sustainable or Not Sustainable? The Role of the Board of Directors. J. Clean. Prod. 2019 , 226 , 1067–1081. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rodrigue, M.; Magnan, M.; Cho, C.H. Is Environmental Governance Substantive or Symbolic? An Empirical Investigation. J. Bus. Ethics 2013 , 114 , 107–129. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hu, Z.; Ma, L.; Xu, X. The Impact Path of Executive Team Heterogeneity and Environmental-Social-Governance on Corporate Performance. Technol. Invest. 2023 , 14 , 279–292. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wernicke, G.; Sajko, M.; Boone, C. How Much Influence Do CEOs Have on Company Actions and Outcomes? The Example of Corporate Social Responsibility. Acad. Manag. Discov. 2022 , 8 , 36–55. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Güngör, N.; Şeker, Y. The Relationship between Board Characteristics and ESG Performance: Evidence from the Oil, Gas and Coal Sector. Stratejik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 2022 , 6 , 17–37. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Uyar, A.; Kuzey, C.; Kilic, M.; Karaman, A.S. Board Structure, Financial Performance, Corporate Social Responsibility Performance, CSR Committee, and CEO Duality: Disentangling the Connection in Healthcare. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2021 , 28 , 1730–1748. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Borghesi, R.; Houston, J.F.; Naranjo, A. Corporate Socially Responsible Investments: CEO Altruism, Reputation, and Shareholder Interests. J. Corp. Financ. 2014 , 26 , 164–181. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hussain, M.J.; Tian, G.; Ayaz, M.; Ashraf, A. CEO Career Horizon and Corporate Social Responsibility Assurance. Span. J. Financ. Account. 2023 , 52 , 384–411. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• García-Blandón, J.; Argilés-Bosch, J.M.; Ravenda, D. Exploring the Relationship between CEO Characteristics and Performance. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 2019 , 20 , 1064–1082. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, L.; Liao, C.; Tsang, A.; Yu, L. CEO Career Concerns in Early Tenure and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. Contemp. Account. Res. 2023 , 40 , 1545–1575. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Shahab, Y.; Ntim, C.G.; Chen, Y.; Ullah, F.; Li, H.; Ye, Z. Chief Executive Officer Attributes, Sustainable Performance, Environmental Performance, and Environmental Reporting: New Insights from Upper Echelons Perspective. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2020 , 29 , 1–16. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bolourian, S.; Angus, A.; Alinaghian, L. The Impact of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility at the Board-Level: A Critical Assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 2021 , 291 , 125752. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Krause, R.; Semadeni, M.; Withers, M.C. That Special Someone: When the Board Views Its Chair as a Resource. Strateg. Manag. J. 2016 , 37 , 1990–2002. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Miller, D. Stale in the Saddle: CEO Tenure and the Match between Organization and Environment. Manag. Sci. 1991 , 37 , 34–52. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• McClelland, P.L.; Barker, V.L.; Oh, W.Y. CEO Career Horizon and Tenure: Future Performance Implications under Different Contingencies. J. Bus. Res. 2012 , 65 , 1387–1393. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Becker, G.S. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education ; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kim, K.; Kim, T.-N. CEO Career Concerns and ESG Investments. Financ. Res. Lett. 2023 , 55 , 103819. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fiss, P.C. A Set-Theoretic Approach to Organizational Configurations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2007 , 32 , 1180–1198. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Paolone, F.; Sardi, A.; Sorano, E.; Ferraris, A. Integrated Processing of Sustainability Accounting Reports: A Multi-Utility Company Case Study. Meditari Account. Res. 2021 , 29 , 985–1004. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liao, L.; Lin, T.; Zhang, Y. Corporate Board and Corporate Social Responsibility Assurance: Evidence from China. J. Bus. Ethics 2018 , 150 , 211–225. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Woodside, A.G. Moving beyond Multiple Regression Analysis to Algorithms: Calling for a Paradigm Shift from Symmetric to Asymmetric Thinking in Data Analysis and Crafting Theory. J. Bus. Res. 2013 , 66 , 463–472. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ragin, C.C. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies ; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA; Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1987; ISBN 0520909240. [ Google Scholar ]
• Schneider, C.Q.; Wagemann, C. Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets. Comp. Sociol. 2010 , 9 , 397–418. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fiss, P.C. Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research. Acad. Manag. J. 2011 , 54 , 393–420. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zadeh, L.A. Fuzzy Sets. Inf. Control 1965 , 8 , 338–353. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pappas, I.O.; Woodside, A.G. Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (FsQCA): Guidelines for Research Practice in Information Systems and Marketing. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2021 , 58 , 102310. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ragin, C.C. Redesigning Social Inquiry ; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA; London, UK, 2008; ISBN 9780226702759. [ Google Scholar ]
• Rihoux, B.; Ragin, C.C. Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques ; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2009; ISBN 9781412942355. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mendel, J.M.; Korjani, M.M. A New Method for Calibrating the Fuzzy Sets Used in FsQCA. Inf. Sci. (N. Y.) 2018 , 468 , 155–171. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Misangyi, V.F.; Acharya, A.G. Substitutes or Complements? A Configurational Examination of Corporate Governance Mechanisms. Acad. Manag. J. 2014 , 57 , 1681–1705. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Misangyi, V.F.; Greckhamer, T.; Furnari, S.; Fiss, P.C.; Crilly, D.; Aguilera, R. Embracing Causal Complexity: The Emergence of a Neo-Configurational Perspective. J. Manag. 2016 , 43 , 255–282. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Greckhamer, T.; Furnari, S.; Fiss, P.C.; Aguilera, R.V. Studying Configurations with Qualitative Comparative Analysis: Best Practices in Strategy and Organization Research. Strateg. Organ. 2018 , 16 , 482–495. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ragin, C.C.; Davey, S. Fuzzy-Set/Qualitative Comparative Analysis 4.0 ; Department of Sociology, University of California: Irvine, CA, USA, 2022. [ Google Scholar ]
• Russo, I.; Confente, I. From Dataset to Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA)—Challenges and Tricky Points: A Research Note on Contrarian Case Analysis and Data Calibration. Australas. Mark. J. (AMJ) 2019 , 27 , 129–135. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Woodside, A.G. Embrace Perform Model: Complexity Theory, Contrarian Case Analysis, and Multiple Realities. J. Bus. Res. 2014 , 67 , 2495–2503. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schneider, C.Q.; Wagemann, C. Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2012; ISBN 9781107013520. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mattke, J.; Maier, C.; Weitzel, T.; Thatcher, J.B. Qualitative Comparative Analysis in the Information Systems Discipline: A Literature Review and Methodological Recommendations. Internet Res. 2021 , 31 , 1493–1517. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dwekat, A.; Seguí-Mas, E.; Tormo-Carbó, G.; Carmona, P. Corporate Governance Configurations and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Audit Committee and Board Characteristics. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2020 , 27 , 2879–2892. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Thiem, A.; Duşa, A. Qualitative Comparative Analysis with R. A User’s Guide ; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; ISBN 978-1-4614-4583-8. [ Google Scholar ]
• Witt, M.A.; Fainshmidt, S.; Aguilera, R.V. Our Board, Our Rules: Nonconformity to Global Corporate Governance Norms. Adm. Sci. Q. 2022 , 67 , 131–166. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Aguilera, R.V.; Marano, V.; Haxhi, I. International Corporate Governance: A Review and Opportunities for Future Research. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2019 , 50 , 457–498. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, W.T.; Zhou, G.S.; Zhu, X.K. CEO Tenure and Corporate Social Responsibility Performance. J. Bus. Res. 2019 , 95 , 292–302. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gurol, B.; Lagasio, V. Women Board Members’ Impact on ESG Disclosure with Environment and Social Dimensions: Evidence from the European Banking Sector. Soc. Responsib. J. 2023 , 19 , 211–228. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pathan, S. Strong Boards, CEO Power and Bank Risk-Taking. J. Bank Financ. 2009 , 33 , 1340–1350. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Oh, W.-Y.; Chang, Y.K.; Cheng, Z. When CEO Career Horizon Problems Matter for Corporate Social Responsibility: The Moderating Roles of Industry-Level Discretion and Blockholder Ownership. J. Bus. Ethics 2016 , 133 , 279–291. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yoo, S.; Managi, S. Disclosure or Action: Evaluating ESG Behavior towards Financial Performance. Financ. Res. Lett. 2022 , 44 , 102108. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• García-Castro, R.; Aguilera, R.V.; Ariño, M.A. Bundles of Firm Corporate Governance Practices: A Fuzzy Set Analysis. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 2013 , 21 , 390–407. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schiehll, E.; Lewellyn, K.B.; Muller-Kahle, M.I. Pilot, Pivot and Advisory Boards: The Role of Governance Configurations in Innovation Commitment. Organ. Stud. 2018 , 39 , 1449–1472. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Share and Cite

Remo-Diez, N.; Mendaña-Cuervo, C.; Arenas-Parra, M. A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis for Understanding the Interactive Effects of Good Governance Practices and CEO Profiles on ESG Performance. Mathematics 2024 , 12 , 2726. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12172726

Remo-Diez N, Mendaña-Cuervo C, Arenas-Parra M. A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis for Understanding the Interactive Effects of Good Governance Practices and CEO Profiles on ESG Performance. Mathematics . 2024; 12(17):2726. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12172726

Remo-Diez, Nieves, Cristina Mendaña-Cuervo, and Mar Arenas-Parra. 2024. "A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis for Understanding the Interactive Effects of Good Governance Practices and CEO Profiles on ESG Performance" Mathematics 12, no. 17: 2726. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12172726

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• J Korean Med Sci
• v.37(16); 2022 Apr 25

A Practical Guide to Writing Quantitative and Qualitative Research Questions and Hypotheses in Scholarly Articles

Edward barroga.

1 Department of General Education, Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke’s International University, Tokyo, Japan.

Glafera Janet Matanguihan

2 Department of Biological Sciences, Messiah University, Mechanicsburg, PA, USA.

The development of research questions and the subsequent hypotheses are prerequisites to defining the main research purpose and specific objectives of a study. Consequently, these objectives determine the study design and research outcome. The development of research questions is a process based on knowledge of current trends, cutting-edge studies, and technological advances in the research field. Excellent research questions are focused and require a comprehensive literature search and in-depth understanding of the problem being investigated. Initially, research questions may be written as descriptive questions which could be developed into inferential questions. These questions must be specific and concise to provide a clear foundation for developing hypotheses. Hypotheses are more formal predictions about the research outcomes. These specify the possible results that may or may not be expected regarding the relationship between groups. Thus, research questions and hypotheses clarify the main purpose and specific objectives of the study, which in turn dictate the design of the study, its direction, and outcome. Studies developed from good research questions and hypotheses will have trustworthy outcomes with wide-ranging social and health implications.

INTRODUCTION

Scientific research is usually initiated by posing evidenced-based research questions which are then explicitly restated as hypotheses. 1 , 2 The hypotheses provide directions to guide the study, solutions, explanations, and expected results. 3 , 4 Both research questions and hypotheses are essentially formulated based on conventional theories and real-world processes, which allow the inception of novel studies and the ethical testing of ideas. 5 , 6

It is crucial to have knowledge of both quantitative and qualitative research 2 as both types of research involve writing research questions and hypotheses. 7 However, these crucial elements of research are sometimes overlooked; if not overlooked, then framed without the forethought and meticulous attention it needs. Planning and careful consideration are needed when developing quantitative or qualitative research, particularly when conceptualizing research questions and hypotheses. 4

There is a continuing need to support researchers in the creation of innovative research questions and hypotheses, as well as for journal articles that carefully review these elements. 1 When research questions and hypotheses are not carefully thought of, unethical studies and poor outcomes usually ensue. Carefully formulated research questions and hypotheses define well-founded objectives, which in turn determine the appropriate design, course, and outcome of the study. This article then aims to discuss in detail the various aspects of crafting research questions and hypotheses, with the goal of guiding researchers as they develop their own. Examples from the authors and peer-reviewed scientific articles in the healthcare field are provided to illustrate key points.

DEFINITIONS AND RELATIONSHIP OF RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND HYPOTHESES

A research question is what a study aims to answer after data analysis and interpretation. The answer is written in length in the discussion section of the paper. Thus, the research question gives a preview of the different parts and variables of the study meant to address the problem posed in the research question. 1 An excellent research question clarifies the research writing while facilitating understanding of the research topic, objective, scope, and limitations of the study. 5

On the other hand, a research hypothesis is an educated statement of an expected outcome. This statement is based on background research and current knowledge. 8 , 9 The research hypothesis makes a specific prediction about a new phenomenon 10 or a formal statement on the expected relationship between an independent variable and a dependent variable. 3 , 11 It provides a tentative answer to the research question to be tested or explored. 4

Hypotheses employ reasoning to predict a theory-based outcome. 10 These can also be developed from theories by focusing on components of theories that have not yet been observed. 10 The validity of hypotheses is often based on the testability of the prediction made in a reproducible experiment. 8

Conversely, hypotheses can also be rephrased as research questions. Several hypotheses based on existing theories and knowledge may be needed to answer a research question. Developing ethical research questions and hypotheses creates a research design that has logical relationships among variables. These relationships serve as a solid foundation for the conduct of the study. 4 , 11 Haphazardly constructed research questions can result in poorly formulated hypotheses and improper study designs, leading to unreliable results. Thus, the formulations of relevant research questions and verifiable hypotheses are crucial when beginning research. 12

CHARACTERISTICS OF GOOD RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND HYPOTHESES

Excellent research questions are specific and focused. These integrate collective data and observations to confirm or refute the subsequent hypotheses. Well-constructed hypotheses are based on previous reports and verify the research context. These are realistic, in-depth, sufficiently complex, and reproducible. More importantly, these hypotheses can be addressed and tested. 13

There are several characteristics of well-developed hypotheses. Good hypotheses are 1) empirically testable 7 , 10 , 11 , 13 ; 2) backed by preliminary evidence 9 ; 3) testable by ethical research 7 , 9 ; 4) based on original ideas 9 ; 5) have evidenced-based logical reasoning 10 ; and 6) can be predicted. 11 Good hypotheses can infer ethical and positive implications, indicating the presence of a relationship or effect relevant to the research theme. 7 , 11 These are initially developed from a general theory and branch into specific hypotheses by deductive reasoning. In the absence of a theory to base the hypotheses, inductive reasoning based on specific observations or findings form more general hypotheses. 10

TYPES OF RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND HYPOTHESES

Research questions and hypotheses are developed according to the type of research, which can be broadly classified into quantitative and qualitative research. We provide a summary of the types of research questions and hypotheses under quantitative and qualitative research categories in Table 1 .

Research questions in quantitative research

In quantitative research, research questions inquire about the relationships among variables being investigated and are usually framed at the start of the study. These are precise and typically linked to the subject population, dependent and independent variables, and research design. 1 Research questions may also attempt to describe the behavior of a population in relation to one or more variables, or describe the characteristics of variables to be measured ( descriptive research questions ). 1 , 5 , 14 These questions may also aim to discover differences between groups within the context of an outcome variable ( comparative research questions ), 1 , 5 , 14 or elucidate trends and interactions among variables ( relationship research questions ). 1 , 5 We provide examples of descriptive, comparative, and relationship research questions in quantitative research in Table 2 .

Hypotheses in quantitative research

In quantitative research, hypotheses predict the expected relationships among variables. 15 Relationships among variables that can be predicted include 1) between a single dependent variable and a single independent variable ( simple hypothesis ) or 2) between two or more independent and dependent variables ( complex hypothesis ). 4 , 11 Hypotheses may also specify the expected direction to be followed and imply an intellectual commitment to a particular outcome ( directional hypothesis ) 4 . On the other hand, hypotheses may not predict the exact direction and are used in the absence of a theory, or when findings contradict previous studies ( non-directional hypothesis ). 4 In addition, hypotheses can 1) define interdependency between variables ( associative hypothesis ), 4 2) propose an effect on the dependent variable from manipulation of the independent variable ( causal hypothesis ), 4 3) state a negative relationship between two variables ( null hypothesis ), 4 , 11 , 15 4) replace the working hypothesis if rejected ( alternative hypothesis ), 15 explain the relationship of phenomena to possibly generate a theory ( working hypothesis ), 11 5) involve quantifiable variables that can be tested statistically ( statistical hypothesis ), 11 6) or express a relationship whose interlinks can be verified logically ( logical hypothesis ). 11 We provide examples of simple, complex, directional, non-directional, associative, causal, null, alternative, working, statistical, and logical hypotheses in quantitative research, as well as the definition of quantitative hypothesis-testing research in Table 3 .

Research questions in qualitative research

Unlike research questions in quantitative research, research questions in qualitative research are usually continuously reviewed and reformulated. The central question and associated subquestions are stated more than the hypotheses. 15 The central question broadly explores a complex set of factors surrounding the central phenomenon, aiming to present the varied perspectives of participants. 15

There are varied goals for which qualitative research questions are developed. These questions can function in several ways, such as to 1) identify and describe existing conditions ( contextual research question s); 2) describe a phenomenon ( descriptive research questions ); 3) assess the effectiveness of existing methods, protocols, theories, or procedures ( evaluation research questions ); 4) examine a phenomenon or analyze the reasons or relationships between subjects or phenomena ( explanatory research questions ); or 5) focus on unknown aspects of a particular topic ( exploratory research questions ). 5 In addition, some qualitative research questions provide new ideas for the development of theories and actions ( generative research questions ) or advance specific ideologies of a position ( ideological research questions ). 1 Other qualitative research questions may build on a body of existing literature and become working guidelines ( ethnographic research questions ). Research questions may also be broadly stated without specific reference to the existing literature or a typology of questions ( phenomenological research questions ), may be directed towards generating a theory of some process ( grounded theory questions ), or may address a description of the case and the emerging themes ( qualitative case study questions ). 15 We provide examples of contextual, descriptive, evaluation, explanatory, exploratory, generative, ideological, ethnographic, phenomenological, grounded theory, and qualitative case study research questions in qualitative research in Table 4 , and the definition of qualitative hypothesis-generating research in Table 5 .

Qualitative studies usually pose at least one central research question and several subquestions starting with How or What . These research questions use exploratory verbs such as explore or describe . These also focus on one central phenomenon of interest, and may mention the participants and research site. 15

Hypotheses in qualitative research

Hypotheses in qualitative research are stated in the form of a clear statement concerning the problem to be investigated. Unlike in quantitative research where hypotheses are usually developed to be tested, qualitative research can lead to both hypothesis-testing and hypothesis-generating outcomes. 2 When studies require both quantitative and qualitative research questions, this suggests an integrative process between both research methods wherein a single mixed-methods research question can be developed. 1

FRAMEWORKS FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND HYPOTHESES

Research questions followed by hypotheses should be developed before the start of the study. 1 , 12 , 14 It is crucial to develop feasible research questions on a topic that is interesting to both the researcher and the scientific community. This can be achieved by a meticulous review of previous and current studies to establish a novel topic. Specific areas are subsequently focused on to generate ethical research questions. The relevance of the research questions is evaluated in terms of clarity of the resulting data, specificity of the methodology, objectivity of the outcome, depth of the research, and impact of the study. 1 , 5 These aspects constitute the FINER criteria (i.e., Feasible, Interesting, Novel, Ethical, and Relevant). 1 Clarity and effectiveness are achieved if research questions meet the FINER criteria. In addition to the FINER criteria, Ratan et al. described focus, complexity, novelty, feasibility, and measurability for evaluating the effectiveness of research questions. 14

The PICOT and PEO frameworks are also used when developing research questions. 1 The following elements are addressed in these frameworks, PICOT: P-population/patients/problem, I-intervention or indicator being studied, C-comparison group, O-outcome of interest, and T-timeframe of the study; PEO: P-population being studied, E-exposure to preexisting conditions, and O-outcome of interest. 1 Research questions are also considered good if these meet the “FINERMAPS” framework: Feasible, Interesting, Novel, Ethical, Relevant, Manageable, Appropriate, Potential value/publishable, and Systematic. 14

As we indicated earlier, research questions and hypotheses that are not carefully formulated result in unethical studies or poor outcomes. To illustrate this, we provide some examples of ambiguous research question and hypotheses that result in unclear and weak research objectives in quantitative research ( Table 6 ) 16 and qualitative research ( Table 7 ) 17 , and how to transform these ambiguous research question(s) and hypothesis(es) into clear and good statements.

a These statements were composed for comparison and illustrative purposes only.

b These statements are direct quotes from Higashihara and Horiuchi. 16

a This statement is a direct quote from Shimoda et al. 17

The other statements were composed for comparison and illustrative purposes only.

CONSTRUCTING RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND HYPOTHESES

To construct effective research questions and hypotheses, it is very important to 1) clarify the background and 2) identify the research problem at the outset of the research, within a specific timeframe. 9 Then, 3) review or conduct preliminary research to collect all available knowledge about the possible research questions by studying theories and previous studies. 18 Afterwards, 4) construct research questions to investigate the research problem. Identify variables to be accessed from the research questions 4 and make operational definitions of constructs from the research problem and questions. Thereafter, 5) construct specific deductive or inductive predictions in the form of hypotheses. 4 Finally, 6) state the study aims . This general flow for constructing effective research questions and hypotheses prior to conducting research is shown in Fig. 1 .

Research questions are used more frequently in qualitative research than objectives or hypotheses. 3 These questions seek to discover, understand, explore or describe experiences by asking “What” or “How.” The questions are open-ended to elicit a description rather than to relate variables or compare groups. The questions are continually reviewed, reformulated, and changed during the qualitative study. 3 Research questions are also used more frequently in survey projects than hypotheses in experiments in quantitative research to compare variables and their relationships.

Hypotheses are constructed based on the variables identified and as an if-then statement, following the template, ‘If a specific action is taken, then a certain outcome is expected.’ At this stage, some ideas regarding expectations from the research to be conducted must be drawn. 18 Then, the variables to be manipulated (independent) and influenced (dependent) are defined. 4 Thereafter, the hypothesis is stated and refined, and reproducible data tailored to the hypothesis are identified, collected, and analyzed. 4 The hypotheses must be testable and specific, 18 and should describe the variables and their relationships, the specific group being studied, and the predicted research outcome. 18 Hypotheses construction involves a testable proposition to be deduced from theory, and independent and dependent variables to be separated and measured separately. 3 Therefore, good hypotheses must be based on good research questions constructed at the start of a study or trial. 12

In summary, research questions are constructed after establishing the background of the study. Hypotheses are then developed based on the research questions. Thus, it is crucial to have excellent research questions to generate superior hypotheses. In turn, these would determine the research objectives and the design of the study, and ultimately, the outcome of the research. 12 Algorithms for building research questions and hypotheses are shown in Fig. 2 for quantitative research and in Fig. 3 for qualitative research.

EXAMPLES OF RESEARCH QUESTIONS FROM PUBLISHED ARTICLES

• EXAMPLE 1. Descriptive research question (quantitative research)
• - Presents research variables to be assessed (distinct phenotypes and subphenotypes)
• “BACKGROUND: Since COVID-19 was identified, its clinical and biological heterogeneity has been recognized. Identifying COVID-19 phenotypes might help guide basic, clinical, and translational research efforts.
• RESEARCH QUESTION: Does the clinical spectrum of patients with COVID-19 contain distinct phenotypes and subphenotypes? ” 19
• EXAMPLE 2. Relationship research question (quantitative research)
• - Shows interactions between dependent variable (static postural control) and independent variable (peripheral visual field loss)
• “Background: Integration of visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive sensations contributes to postural control. People with peripheral visual field loss have serious postural instability. However, the directional specificity of postural stability and sensory reweighting caused by gradual peripheral visual field loss remain unclear.
• Research question: What are the effects of peripheral visual field loss on static postural control ?” 20
• EXAMPLE 3. Comparative research question (quantitative research)
• - Clarifies the difference among groups with an outcome variable (patients enrolled in COMPERA with moderate PH or severe PH in COPD) and another group without the outcome variable (patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH))
• “BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) in COPD is a poorly investigated clinical condition.
• RESEARCH QUESTION: Which factors determine the outcome of PH in COPD?
• STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed the characteristics and outcome of patients enrolled in the Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA) with moderate or severe PH in COPD as defined during the 6th PH World Symposium who received medical therapy for PH and compared them with patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) .” 21
• EXAMPLE 4. Exploratory research question (qualitative research)
• - Explores areas that have not been fully investigated (perspectives of families and children who receive care in clinic-based child obesity treatment) to have a deeper understanding of the research problem
• “Problem: Interventions for children with obesity lead to only modest improvements in BMI and long-term outcomes, and data are limited on the perspectives of families of children with obesity in clinic-based treatment. This scoping review seeks to answer the question: What is known about the perspectives of families and children who receive care in clinic-based child obesity treatment? This review aims to explore the scope of perspectives reported by families of children with obesity who have received individualized outpatient clinic-based obesity treatment.” 22
• EXAMPLE 5. Relationship research question (quantitative research)
• - Defines interactions between dependent variable (use of ankle strategies) and independent variable (changes in muscle tone)
• “Background: To maintain an upright standing posture against external disturbances, the human body mainly employs two types of postural control strategies: “ankle strategy” and “hip strategy.” While it has been reported that the magnitude of the disturbance alters the use of postural control strategies, it has not been elucidated how the level of muscle tone, one of the crucial parameters of bodily function, determines the use of each strategy. We have previously confirmed using forward dynamics simulations of human musculoskeletal models that an increased muscle tone promotes the use of ankle strategies. The objective of the present study was to experimentally evaluate a hypothesis: an increased muscle tone promotes the use of ankle strategies. Research question: Do changes in the muscle tone affect the use of ankle strategies ?” 23

EXAMPLES OF HYPOTHESES IN PUBLISHED ARTICLES

• EXAMPLE 1. Working hypothesis (quantitative research)
• - A hypothesis that is initially accepted for further research to produce a feasible theory
• “As fever may have benefit in shortening the duration of viral illness, it is plausible to hypothesize that the antipyretic efficacy of ibuprofen may be hindering the benefits of a fever response when taken during the early stages of COVID-19 illness .” 24
• “In conclusion, it is plausible to hypothesize that the antipyretic efficacy of ibuprofen may be hindering the benefits of a fever response . The difference in perceived safety of these agents in COVID-19 illness could be related to the more potent efficacy to reduce fever with ibuprofen compared to acetaminophen. Compelling data on the benefit of fever warrant further research and review to determine when to treat or withhold ibuprofen for early stage fever for COVID-19 and other related viral illnesses .” 24
• EXAMPLE 2. Exploratory hypothesis (qualitative research)
• - Explores particular areas deeper to clarify subjective experience and develop a formal hypothesis potentially testable in a future quantitative approach
• “We hypothesized that when thinking about a past experience of help-seeking, a self distancing prompt would cause increased help-seeking intentions and more favorable help-seeking outcome expectations .” 25
• “Conclusion
• Although a priori hypotheses were not supported, further research is warranted as results indicate the potential for using self-distancing approaches to increasing help-seeking among some people with depressive symptomatology.” 25
• EXAMPLE 3. Hypothesis-generating research to establish a framework for hypothesis testing (qualitative research)
• “We hypothesize that compassionate care is beneficial for patients (better outcomes), healthcare systems and payers (lower costs), and healthcare providers (lower burnout). ” 26
• Compassionomics is the branch of knowledge and scientific study of the effects of compassionate healthcare. Our main hypotheses are that compassionate healthcare is beneficial for (1) patients, by improving clinical outcomes, (2) healthcare systems and payers, by supporting financial sustainability, and (3) HCPs, by lowering burnout and promoting resilience and well-being. The purpose of this paper is to establish a scientific framework for testing the hypotheses above . If these hypotheses are confirmed through rigorous research, compassionomics will belong in the science of evidence-based medicine, with major implications for all healthcare domains.” 26
• EXAMPLE 4. Statistical hypothesis (quantitative research)
• - An assumption is made about the relationship among several population characteristics ( gender differences in sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of adults with ADHD ). Validity is tested by statistical experiment or analysis ( chi-square test, Students t-test, and logistic regression analysis)
• “Our research investigated gender differences in sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of adults with ADHD in a Japanese clinical sample. Due to unique Japanese cultural ideals and expectations of women's behavior that are in opposition to ADHD symptoms, we hypothesized that women with ADHD experience more difficulties and present more dysfunctions than men . We tested the following hypotheses: first, women with ADHD have more comorbidities than men with ADHD; second, women with ADHD experience more social hardships than men, such as having less full-time employment and being more likely to be divorced.” 27
• “Statistical Analysis
• ( text omitted ) Between-gender comparisons were made using the chi-squared test for categorical variables and Students t-test for continuous variables…( text omitted ). A logistic regression analysis was performed for employment status, marital status, and comorbidity to evaluate the independent effects of gender on these dependent variables.” 27

EXAMPLES OF HYPOTHESIS AS WRITTEN IN PUBLISHED ARTICLES IN RELATION TO OTHER PARTS

• EXAMPLE 1. Background, hypotheses, and aims are provided
• “Pregnant women need skilled care during pregnancy and childbirth, but that skilled care is often delayed in some countries …( text omitted ). The focused antenatal care (FANC) model of WHO recommends that nurses provide information or counseling to all pregnant women …( text omitted ). Job aids are visual support materials that provide the right kind of information using graphics and words in a simple and yet effective manner. When nurses are not highly trained or have many work details to attend to, these job aids can serve as a content reminder for the nurses and can be used for educating their patients (Jennings, Yebadokpo, Affo, & Agbogbe, 2010) ( text omitted ). Importantly, additional evidence is needed to confirm how job aids can further improve the quality of ANC counseling by health workers in maternal care …( text omitted )” 28
• “ This has led us to hypothesize that the quality of ANC counseling would be better if supported by job aids. Consequently, a better quality of ANC counseling is expected to produce higher levels of awareness concerning the danger signs of pregnancy and a more favorable impression of the caring behavior of nurses .” 28
• “This study aimed to examine the differences in the responses of pregnant women to a job aid-supported intervention during ANC visit in terms of 1) their understanding of the danger signs of pregnancy and 2) their impression of the caring behaviors of nurses to pregnant women in rural Tanzania.” 28
• EXAMPLE 2. Background, hypotheses, and aims are provided
• “We conducted a two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate and compare changes in salivary cortisol and oxytocin levels of first-time pregnant women between experimental and control groups. The women in the experimental group touched and held an infant for 30 min (experimental intervention protocol), whereas those in the control group watched a DVD movie of an infant (control intervention protocol). The primary outcome was salivary cortisol level and the secondary outcome was salivary oxytocin level.” 29
• “ We hypothesize that at 30 min after touching and holding an infant, the salivary cortisol level will significantly decrease and the salivary oxytocin level will increase in the experimental group compared with the control group .” 29
• EXAMPLE 3. Background, aim, and hypothesis are provided
• “In countries where the maternal mortality ratio remains high, antenatal education to increase Birth Preparedness and Complication Readiness (BPCR) is considered one of the top priorities [1]. BPCR includes birth plans during the antenatal period, such as the birthplace, birth attendant, transportation, health facility for complications, expenses, and birth materials, as well as family coordination to achieve such birth plans. In Tanzania, although increasing, only about half of all pregnant women attend an antenatal clinic more than four times [4]. Moreover, the information provided during antenatal care (ANC) is insufficient. In the resource-poor settings, antenatal group education is a potential approach because of the limited time for individual counseling at antenatal clinics.” 30
• “This study aimed to evaluate an antenatal group education program among pregnant women and their families with respect to birth-preparedness and maternal and infant outcomes in rural villages of Tanzania.” 30
• “ The study hypothesis was if Tanzanian pregnant women and their families received a family-oriented antenatal group education, they would (1) have a higher level of BPCR, (2) attend antenatal clinic four or more times, (3) give birth in a health facility, (4) have less complications of women at birth, and (5) have less complications and deaths of infants than those who did not receive the education .” 30

Research questions and hypotheses are crucial components to any type of research, whether quantitative or qualitative. These questions should be developed at the very beginning of the study. Excellent research questions lead to superior hypotheses, which, like a compass, set the direction of research, and can often determine the successful conduct of the study. Many research studies have floundered because the development of research questions and subsequent hypotheses was not given the thought and meticulous attention needed. The development of research questions and hypotheses is an iterative process based on extensive knowledge of the literature and insightful grasp of the knowledge gap. Focused, concise, and specific research questions provide a strong foundation for constructing hypotheses which serve as formal predictions about the research outcomes. Research questions and hypotheses are crucial elements of research that should not be overlooked. They should be carefully thought of and constructed when planning research. This avoids unethical studies and poor outcomes by defining well-founded objectives that determine the design, course, and outcome of the study.

Disclosure: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author Contributions:

• Conceptualization: Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ.
• Methodology: Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ.
• Writing - original draft: Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ.
• Writing - review & editing: Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ.