southwest airlines' competitive advantage case study

MBA Knowledge Base

Business • Management • Technology

Home » Management Case Studies » Case Study: Southwest Airlines Competitive Advantages

Case Study: Southwest Airlines Competitive Advantages

For most of the last fifteen years, the U.S. airline industry has been one of the least attractive to be in. Following the 1978 deregulation of the industry, twenty-nine new airlines entered the industry between 1978 and 1993- This rapid increase in air ­line carrying capacity led to a situation of overcapacity. As more and more airlines chased passengers, fares were driven down to levels barely sufficient to maintain the prof ­itability of U.S. airlines. Indeed, twice since 1978 the indus ­try has been engulfed in an intense price war–first in the1981-1983 period and then again in the 1990-1993 period. So intense did the com ­petition become during these two periods that in 1982 the whole industry lost $700 million, while in the 1990-1992 period the industry lost a staggering $7.1 billion, more than had been made during the previous fifty-year history of the industry.

Southwest is profitable because of two factors: its low costs and the loyalty of its customers. Its low costs come from a number of sources. Southwest offers a no-frills approach to customer service. No meals are served on board, and there are no first-class seats. Southwest does not subscribe to the big reservation computers used by travel agents because it deems the booking fees too costly. The airline flies only one type of aircraft, the fuel-efficient Boeing 737, which keeps training and maintenance costs down. Southwest’s customer loyalty also comes from a number of sources. Due to its low cost structure, Southwest can offer its customers low prices, which builds loyalty. Southwest also has a reputation for being the most reliable carrier in the industry. It has the quickest turn ­around time in the industry (it takes a Southwest ground crew just fifteen minutes to turn around an incoming a craft and prepare it for departure), which helps keep flights on time. The company also has a well-earned reputation for listening to its customers. For example, when five Texas medical students who commuted weekly to out-of-state medical school complained that the flight them to class fifteen minutes late, Southwest moved the departure time up fifteen minutes. In addition, South west’s focused route structure (it serves just fifteen states, mostly in the South) has helped it build a substantial regional presence and avoid some of the cutthroat competition that the nationwide airlines have to grapple with.

Last but not least, the airline has a very productive work force. Southwest Airlines’ People Department, is touted as the crux on their groundbreaking route to success in the airline industry, and there is no question that both the ingrained and manufactured personality traits along with the both the innate and encouraged behavior patterns of Southwest employees have been an important factor in their recent success, however their true competitive advantage lies in the simplicity and streamlined nature of their product and operation. Southwest’s original business plan to dominate in the interstate air traffic in both Texas and California was forced upon them by the actions of their competitors, and it was at this time in the company’s history that the underdog/scrapper nature of their employees, especially Herb Kelleher, the CEO, really made a huge impact. Kelleher even compared himself at the time to a medieval crusader, which shows the depth of his passion and commitment to his company. When Southwest was faced with such a daunting uphill climb to be competitive in the industry, that unique spirit that is still highly-valued was crucial to their success in the introduction and growth phase of the company. That spirit provided the inspiration for extremely high levels of organizational commitment Southwest needed for employees to struggle for years to achieve even the beginnings of a successful airline. Employees felt, and still feel, like they had true ownership in the company and that their behaviors and attitude on a daily basis led to the company’s success. Though these feelings have proven to be helpful it is Southwest’s very targeted business plan and their slow expansion that is their advantage. Southwest choose to be the best at what they were “given” in the early 1970’s, they threw everything at it with a crusader’s commitment and it worked. Then by maintaining their low cost, no frills beginnings as they unhurriedly expanded the continued underdog attitude has worked because essentially as Southwest expands they are underdogs in the markets they are joining. Their competitive advantage is their business model, a difficult one to initiate and maintain in the airline business therefore they need the unique employee spirit to implement such a difficult strategy. For example, their pilots work more hours for less pay but their commitment to making the Airline a success and the feelings generated by the organizational commitment of upper management and their colleagues make that extra work fulfilling because the pilots are conditioned to feel they themselves and their actions are crucial to Southwest’s triumph. In addition, Southwest operates a gener ­ous stock option plan that extends to all employees. As a result about 10 percent of the airline’s stock is owned by its employees, which gives them an additional incentive to work hard.

• What does the success of Southwest Airlines tell you about the relative importance of industry company-specific factors in explaining a con performance?
• What is the basis of Southwest Airlines competitive advantage? How might it lose that advantage?

Related posts:

• Case Study: An Analysis of Competitive Advantages of Honda Corporation
• Case Study: Merger Between US Airways and American Airlines
• Case Study of Qantas Airlines: Business Model and Strategies
• Case Study: Delta Airlines Successful Business Turnaround Strategy
• Case Study: Amazon’s Competitive Advantage
• Case Study: Competitive Advantage of Boeing
• Case Study of Dyson: Competitive Advantage through Innovation
• Case Study: Google’s Quest for Competitive Advantage
• Case Study: Google’s Competitive Advantage
• Case Study: Dell’s Competitive Advantage

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

A unique take on Southwest Airlines Strategy

Anyone who has studied business management either as a degree or as an elective would have definitely studied Michael Porter’s 5 Forces framework. This framework was first published in  Harvard Business Review  in 1979. The model is very much relevant in 21st-century business as well due to its deep 360-degree view of a business.

One of the 5 forces is called “Barriers to Entry” and more often than not either Oil & Gas or Airline industry would serve as an apt example of an industry with very high barriers to entry due to its high Capex and Opex requirements.

But wait, then with so many barriers to entry, why do airlines still bleed red? There are many reasons for this, but one of them is stiff competition with low-cost carriers, the 5th, and the framework’s central force (competition among the players).

Before we move on, the below is an interesting tweet response from Anand Mahindra, on being asked to buy the ailing “ Jet Airways ”.

Remember the quote: “If you want to be a millionaire, start with a Billion dollars and then start (buy) an airline!” https://t.co/dYRdwup3kK — anand mahindra (@anandmahindra) June 29, 2019

The US Airline Industry

Following the 9/11 attacks, the US airline industry has been through rough weather. 20+ airlines have filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 7. 60+ airlines have filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11.  This list also includes the top 3 out of 4 airlines namely, American Airlines, United & Delta Air Lines, however they were able to exit the bankruptcy within a few years.

The landscape has been constantly changing with a high volume of mergers and acquisitions, resulting in changing market share statistics.

The graph above covering the period January to December 2020 showcases that the top 4 airlines constitute approx. 65% of the market share.

In this story, we are focusing on Southwest Airlines that was founded on the notions of the low-cost carrier but with its unique strategy has been profitable for the last 45 years in a row. 

The takeoff strategy of Southwest Airlines

Southwest Airlines Co. , typically referred to as Southwest, is one of the United States’ major airlines and the world’s largest low-cost carrier airline. The airline was established on March 15, 1967, by  Herb Kelleher  as Air Southwest Co. and adopted its current name, Southwest Airlines Co., in 1971, when it began operating as an intrastate airline wholly within the state of Texas first flying between Dallas, Houston and San Antonio. 

Most airlines back in the 1960s followed the most popular “Hub and Spoke” model for their operations.

Hub and Spoke model – As the name suggests, there is a defined hub from where the flights originate, and the destinations are the spokes.

The benefit of a hub and spoke model is that it has fewer routes, but the major drawback of this model is its rigidity, and if there is a slight change in the airline routing due to weather, etc., it can have cascading consequences to the other planned flights.

Point to Point model – Southwest, being a low-cost carrier, focused more on the point to point model and bought significant process improvements, in a way mastered it to achieve very high operational efficiency.

In the point-to-point model, each flight is a single journey. The origin and destination are connected via a single non-stop flight. The point-to-point model offers more travel options and flexibility as compared to the hub and spoke model.

For passengers undertaking further journeys, they will have to collect the baggage and recheck them for leg 2 of their journey. This model has considerably led to saved travel hours and done away with the necessity for connecting flights.

Key Differentiating Factors in Southwest Airlines Strategy

Southwest airlines is the third largest airline in the United States of America and arguably the biggest in the low-cost carrier segment across the globe.

So, was the operational efficiency gained due to the change in the flight operations model the only reason why Southwest airlines is the #1 low-cost carrier in the world?

NO, let’s understand what differentiated Southwest airlines strategy from its counterparts.

Customer Eccentricity

For Southwest, they keep the customers at the center of their business operations. They offer certain benefits to flyers which are not offered by other airlines, like

• Southwest allows two checked-in bags, free of cost, unlike many of its competitors.
• Flight change thirty minutes prior to the departure is allowed by Southwest.
• Southwest offers free in-flight entertainment like Live TV, Movies, use of whatsapp and imessage. It offers Wi-Fi services at very nominal rates.

All these have resulted in Southwest being the airline with the least number of complaints, according to the Department of Transportation of the United States of America.

Only one type of aircraft

Many airlines have different types of aircraft in their fleet, but not Southwest. Southwest operates by using only Boeing 737 aircraft. It saves a lot of money by:

• Training cabin crews and support staff on only one type of aircraft.
• Maintenance of inventory of spare parts for one aircraft type.
• In case of breakdown, alternate aircraft can be arranged immediately.
• Its policy of not assigning seats helps tremendously as customers can take any available seat when boarding the aircraft, thereby reducing the boarding time. In the case of alternate aircraft also, this policy hugely benefits the airline reducing the turnaround time.

Right recruitment policies

Southwest stresses a lot on the customer experience and hence it is very imperative for the airline to hire the right kind of people. Southwest focusses on hiring people who have an attitude for serving customers.

Employees undergo various pieces of training which also includes cross-training. Training is heavily centered around team building and collaboration.

The Southwest Airlines case study is a lesson in cultural strategy. An organization built on the fundamentals of customer eccentricity, effective processes, and a dedicated team is meant to achieve success and overcome challenges. This model of exceptional customer service can help a business earn an impeccable reputation in the industry. That’s what makes the Southwest model uniquely priced, yet one profitable in this cruel airline industry.

Southwest’s ability to be different and not follow the herd—not to mention becoming America’s largest airline—can be traced in large part to the Airline Deregulation Act. Thanks to this act, Herb and Rollin realized their Vision and the traveling public benefits on every flight, every day. Gary Kelly, Chairman & CEO, Southwest Airlines

Vinit Joshi is Corporate Planning & Strategy professional with 15+ years of experience across renowned & diversified business groups. When not working or spending time with family, Vinit loves listening to a variety of music

Related Posts

AI is Shattering the Chains of Traditional Procurement

Revolutionizing Supply Chain Planning with AI: The Future Unleashed

Is AI the death knell for traditional supply chain management?

Merchant-focused Business & Growth Strategy of Shopify

Business, Growth & Acquisition Strategy of Salesforce

Hybrid Business Strategy of IBM

Strategy Ingredients that make Natural Ice Cream a King

Investing in Consumer Staples: Profiting from Caution

Storytelling: The best strategy for brands

How Acquisitions Drive the Business Strategy of New York Times

Rely on Annual Planning at Your Peril

How does Vinted make money by selling Pre-Owned clothes?

N26 Business Model: Changing banking for the better

Sprinklr Business Model: Managing Unified Customer Experience

How does OpenTable make money | Business model

How does Paytm make money | Business Model

Write a comment cancel reply.

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Advanced Strategies
• Brand Marketing
• Digital Marketing
• Luxury Business
• Startup Strategies
• 1 Minute Strategy Stories
• Business Or Revenue Model
• Forward Thinking Strategies
• Infographics
• Publish & Promote Your Article
• Write Article
• Testimonials
• TSS Programs
• Fight Against Covid
• Privacy Policy
• Terms and condition
• Refund/Cancellation Policy
• Master Sessions
• Live Courses
• Playbook & Guides

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

• About / Contact
• Privacy Policy
• Alphabetical List of Companies
• Business Analysis Topics

Southwest Airlines’ Generic Competitive Strategy, Growth Strategies

Southwest Airlines’ generic competitive strategy (Porter’s model) ensures product/service attractiveness and competitive advantages for successfully implementing intensive strategies for growth (Ansoff Matrix). With a strategic position as one of the main competitors in the commercial aviation industry in the United States, the company is popular for its low fares and high accessibility. These variables relate to Southwest’s intensive growth strategies and generic competitive strategy. In Michael E. Porter’s model, competitive advantage is developed through generic competitive strategies that the airline company can apply. On the other hand, based on Igor Ansoff’s matrix, Southwest Airlines can use various intensive growth strategies. These corporate strategy frameworks are considered in this business analysis of the commercial aviation company and its approach to growing despite strong competitors. Southwest’s success indicates effective implementation of its generic strategy for competitive advantage and intensive growth strategies suited to the business.

Southwest Airlines uses its generic competitive strategy to counteract the competitive power of other firms, such as Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, and American Airlines. These competing commercial aviation companies possess resources and the operating scale to grow despite the competitive landscape. Southwest’s intensive growth strategies facilitate the operational scale needed to maintain the corporation’s generic strategy, thereby also strengthening its competitive advantage and competitive positioning in the industry.

Southwest’s Generic Competitive Strategy (Porter’s Model)

Southwest Airlines’ generic competitive strategy is cost leadership , which creates competitive advantage based on low costs and correspondingly low prices. To address competition, the company’s strategic objective in this generic competitive strategy is to minimize operating costs, optimize profit margins, keep low prices, and offer its airline services to the mass market. The large-scale operations linked to this generic strategy for competitive advantage supports the fulfillment of Southwest Airlines’ mission statement and vision statement , which aim for global leadership in the industry. The commercial aviation corporation’s success depends on effectiveness in implementing the generic competitive strategy of cost leadership.

Cost leadership as a generic competitive strategy is observable in Southwest Airlines’ service offerings as a low-cost carrier. The company’s advertising campaigns frequently emphasize low fares as a selling point, in contrast to other firms that use the focus strategy or the differentiation strategy, such as Delta. In a way, Southwest has a best-cost provider strategy, as the company continues to minimize costs while also maintaining a high level of customer satisfaction through service quality. Based on its generic competitive strategy, the enterprise presents itself as a major commercial aviation contender in terms of price and in terms of warmth and friendliness in its customer service.

Southwest’s Intensive Growth Strategies (Ansoff Matrix)

Market Penetration . With its generic competitive strategy, Southwest Airlines applies market penetration as its primary intensive growth strategy. The company’s strategic objective in this intensive strategy is to grow its revenues by providing more of its current air transportation services to more passengers in markets where it currently operates. Southwest’s generic strategy of cost leadership ensures low costs that translate to across-the-board low prices that are a competitive advantage for keeping a large share of the commercial aviation market, in support of market penetration as an intensive growth strategy. The price sensitivity of customers in the transportation sector is one of the factors that make cost leadership and market penetration effective strategies in this case. The business strengths and competitive advantages identified in the SWOT analysis of Southwest Airlines Co. attract customers and support the success of market penetration. The strong airline brand and attractive prices enable this intensive growth strategy. Also, Southwest Airlines’ marketing mix (4P) determines how the company penetrates the target market.

Product Development . Product development is a minor intensive growth strategy in Southwest’s organizational development. The corporation’s competitive advantage depends mainly on cost leadership as its generic competitive strategy, and market penetration as its intensive strategy for airline business growth. Southwest’s product evolution has already stabilized, which means that the business has been aiming its product development efforts mostly at enhancing its current offerings. Thus, product development, as an intensive growth strategy, minimally contributes to growing the airline company. Changes in current products require corresponding changes in Southwest Airlines’ operations management, which manifests the applied intensive growth strategies and generic competitive strategy for competitive advantage in commercial aviation. The organizational culture (corporate culture) of Southwest Airlines is also a factor integrated into product development, as the company relies on organizational cultural variables to optimize its service quality and customer satisfaction and loyalty.

Market Development . The growth of Southwest Airlines minimally depends on market development. This intensive growth strategy aims to offer current services to new commercial aviation markets. When applying market development, the generic competitive strategy of cost leadership ensures competitive advantage in new civil aviation markets. However, Southwest continues to focus on its limited multinational operations in the United States and a few other countries. Thus, market development is not a significant intensive growth strategy for the airline business.

Diversification . Diversification is an insignificant intensive growth strategy for Southwest Airlines. The objective of this intensive strategy is to grow the company through new operations, such as service businesses related to air travel operations. Southwest focuses on growing within its current markets, with minimal emphasis on using the generic competitive strategy of cost leadership for competitive advantage in diversifying its business. Thus, diversification is an insignificant intensive growth strategy in the airline business. The addition or expansion of business operations requires accompanying changes in Southwest Airlines’ organizational structure (business structure) .

Key Points – Southwest’s Generic Competitive Strategy & Intensive Growth Strategies

Southwest Airlines applies cost leadership as its generic strategy for competitive advantage, along with intensive growth strategies to maximize market share and move toward its long-term goal and strategic plan of becoming a global industry leader. The intensive strategy of market penetration provides support for the airline company’s generic competitive strategy of cost leadership, and vice versa. Southwest’s brand image and service quality reflect these strategies and associated competitive advantages. For example, customers know the company for low airfares, which are a consequence of cost leadership as a generic competitive strategy that leads to cost-based and price-based competitive advantages. Also, Southwest is known for its large-scale operations, which are a result of market penetration as an intensive growth strategy.

• Kerkemezos, Y., Pennings, E., Karreman, B., & van Reeven, P. (2023). Price asymmetries and the path dependence of market power: Evidence from the US airline industry. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 87 , 102921.
• Obu, O. C., & Ukpere, W. I. (2023). The effects of transactional barriers on the effectiveness of a firm’s competitive strategy. Journal of Economic Development, Environment & People, 12 (3).
• Southwest Airlines Co. – Form 10-K .
• Southwest Airlines Co. – Proven Business Strategy .
• U.S. Department of Commerce – International Trade Administration – Travel, Tourism & Hospitality Industry .
• Copyright by Panmore Institute - All rights reserved.
• This article may not be reproduced, distributed, or mirrored without written permission from Panmore Institute and its author/s.
• Educators, Researchers, and Students: You are permitted to quote or paraphrase parts of this article (not the entire article) for educational or research purposes, as long as the article is properly cited and referenced together with its URL/link.

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Southwest Airlines: A Case Study Linking Employee Needs Satisfaction and Organizational Capabilities to Competitive Advantage

This article analyzes the sources of Southwest Airlines' competitive aduantage using an integrative approach, employing economic analysis tools to illustrate the roles of commitment and organizational capabilities in delivering competitive advantage at Southwest. A framework is presented illustrating that much of the value Southwest generates is (1) created through employee needs satisfaction, (2) converted to customer and shareholder value via organizational capabilities, and (3) captured by the firm as a result of its cost advantage and superior service. This three-part framework may be applicable to other labor-dependent service organizations.

RELATED PAPERS

World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development

Siobhan Tiernan

Journal of Business Research

Sara Campani

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

About Stanford GSB

• The Leadership
• Dean’s Updates
• School News & History
• Commencement
• Business, Government & Society
• Centers & Institutes
• Center for Entrepreneurial Studies
• Center for Social Innovation
• Stanford Seed

About the Experience

• Learning at Stanford GSB
• Experiential Learning
• Guest Speakers
• Entrepreneurship
• Social Innovation
• Communication
• Life at Stanford GSB
• Collaborative Environment
• Activities & Organizations
• Student Services
• Housing Options
• International Students

Full-Time Degree Programs

• Why Stanford MBA
• Academic Experience
• Financial Aid
• Why Stanford MSx
• Research Fellows Program
• See All Programs

Non-Degree & Certificate Programs

• Executive Education
• Stanford Executive Program
• Programs for Organizations
• The Difference
• Online Programs
• Stanford LEAD
• Seed Transformation Program
• Aspire Program
• Seed Spark Program
• Faculty Profiles
• Academic Areas
• Awards & Honors
• Conferences

Faculty Research

• Publications
• Working Papers
• Case Studies

Research Hub

• Research Labs & Initiatives
• Business Library
• Data, Analytics & Research Computing
• Behavioral Lab

Research Labs

• Cities, Housing & Society Lab
• Golub Capital Social Impact Lab

Research Initiatives

• Corporate Governance Research Initiative
• Corporations and Society Initiative
• Policy and Innovation Initiative
• Rapid Decarbonization Initiative
• Stanford Latino Entrepreneurship Initiative
• Value Chain Innovation Initiative
• Venture Capital Initiative
• Career & Success
• Climate & Sustainability
• Corporate Governance
• Culture & Society
• Finance & Investing
• Government & Politics
• Leadership & Management
• Markets and Trade
• Operations & Logistics
• Opportunity & Access
• Technology & AI
• Opinion & Analysis
• Email Newsletter

Welcome, Alumni

• Communities
• Digital Communities & Tools
• Regional Chapters
• Women’s Programs
• Identity Chapters
• Find Your Reunion
• Career Resources
• Job Search Resources
• Career & Life Transitions
• Programs & Webinars
• Career Video Library
• Alumni Education
• Research Resources
• Volunteering
• Alumni News
• Class Notes
• Alumni Voices
• Contact Alumni Relations
• Upcoming Events

Admission Events & Information Sessions

• MBA Program
• MSx Program
• PhD Program
• Alumni Events
• All Other Events
• Operations, Information & Technology
• Organizational Behavior
• Political Economy
• Classical Liberalism
• The Eddie Lunch
• Accounting Summer Camp
• California Econometrics Conference
• California Quantitative Marketing PhD Conference
• California School Conference
• China India Insights Conference
• Homo economicus, Evolving
• Political Economics (2023–24)
• Scaling Geologic Storage of CO2 (2023–24)
• A Resilient Pacific: Building Connections, Envisioning Solutions
• Adaptation and Innovation
• Changing Climate
• Civil Society
• Climate Impact Summit
• Climate Science
• Corporate Carbon Disclosures
• Earth’s Seafloor
• Environmental Justice
• Operations and Information Technology
• Organizations
• Sustainability Reporting and Control
• Taking the Pulse of the Planet
• Urban Infrastructure
• Watershed Restoration
• Junior Faculty Workshop on Financial Regulation and Banking
• Ken Singleton Celebration
• Marketing Camp
• Quantitative Marketing PhD Alumni Conference
• Presentations
• Theory and Inference in Accounting Research
• Stanford Closer Look Series
• Quick Guides
• Core Concepts
• Journal Articles
• Glossary of Terms
• Faculty & Staff
• Researchers & Students
• Research Approach
• Charitable Giving
• Financial Health
• Government Services
• Workers & Careers
• Short Course
• Adaptive & Iterative Experimentation
• Incentive Design
• Social Sciences & Behavioral Nudges
• Bandit Experiment Application
• Conferences & Events
• Get Involved
• Reading Materials
• Teaching & Curriculum
• Energy Entrepreneurship
• Faculty & Affiliates
• SOLE Report
• Responsible Supply Chains
• Current Study Usage
• Pre-Registration Information
• Participate in a Study

Southwest Airlines (A)

• See the Current DEI Report
• Supporting Data
• Research & Insights
• Share Your Thoughts
• Search Fund Primer
• Affiliated Faculty
• Faculty Advisors
• Louis W. Foster Resource Center
• Defining Social Innovation
• Impact Compass
• Global Health Innovation Insights
• Faculty Affiliates
• Student Awards & Certificates
• Changemakers
• Dean Jonathan Levin
• Dean Garth Saloner
• Dean Robert Joss
• Dean Michael Spence
• Dean Robert Jaedicke
• Dean Rene McPherson
• Dean Arjay Miller
• Dean Ernest Arbuckle
• Dean Jacob Hugh Jackson
• Dean Willard Hotchkiss
• Faculty in Memoriam
• Stanford GSB Firsts
• Annual Alumni Dinner
• Class of 2024 Candidates
• Certificate & Award Recipients
• Dean’s Remarks
• Keynote Address
• Teaching Approach
• Analysis and Measurement of Impact
• The Corporate Entrepreneur: Startup in a Grown-Up Enterprise
• Data-Driven Impact
• Designing Experiments for Impact
• Digital Marketing
• The Founder’s Right Hand
• Marketing for Measurable Change
• Product Management
• Public Policy Lab: Financial Challenges Facing US Cities
• Public Policy Lab: Homelessness in California
• Lab Features
• Curricular Integration
• View From The Top
• Formation of New Ventures
• Managing Growing Enterprises
• Startup Garage
• Explore Beyond the Classroom
• Stanford Venture Studio
• Summer Program
• Workshops & Events
• The Five Lenses of Entrepreneurship
• Leadership Labs
• Executive Challenge
• Arbuckle Leadership Fellows Program
• Selection Process
• Training Schedule
• Time Commitment
• Learning Expectations
• Post-Training Opportunities
• Who Should Apply
• Introductory T-Groups
• Leadership for Society Program
• Certificate
• 2024 Awardees
• 2023 Awardees
• 2022 Awardees
• 2021 Awardees
• 2020 Awardees
• 2019 Awardees
• 2018 Awardees
• Social Management Immersion Fund
• Stanford Impact Founder Fellowships
• Stanford Impact Leader Prizes
• Social Entrepreneurship
• Stanford GSB Impact Fund
• Economic Development
• Energy & Environment
• Stanford GSB Residences
• Environmental Leadership
• Stanford GSB Artwork
• A Closer Look
• California & the Bay Area
• Voices of Stanford GSB
• Business & Beneficial Technology
• Business & Sustainability
• Business & Free Markets
• Business, Government, and Society Forum
• Second Year
• Global Experiences
• JD/MBA Joint Degree
• MA Education/MBA Joint Degree
• MD/MBA Dual Degree
• MPP/MBA Joint Degree
• MS Computer Science/MBA Joint Degree
• MS Electrical Engineering/MBA Joint Degree
• MS Environment and Resources (E-IPER)/MBA Joint Degree
• Academic Calendar
• Clubs & Activities
• LGBTQ+ Students
• Military Veterans
• Minorities & People of Color
• Partners & Families
• Students with Disabilities
• Student Support
• Residential Life
• Student Voices
• MBA Alumni Voices
• A Week in the Life
• Career Support
• Employment Outcomes
• Cost of Attendance
• Knight-Hennessy Scholars Program
• Yellow Ribbon Program
• BOLD Fellows Fund
• Application Process
• Loan Forgiveness
• Contact the Financial Aid Office
• Evaluation Criteria
• GMAT & GRE
• English Language Proficiency
• Personal Information, Activities & Awards
• Professional Experience
• Letters of Recommendation
• Optional Short Answer Questions
• Application Fee
• Reapplication
• Deferred Enrollment
• Joint & Dual Degrees
• Entering Class Profile
• Event Schedule
• Ambassadors
• New & Noteworthy
• Ask a Question
• See Why Stanford MSx
• Is MSx Right for You?
• MSx Stories
• Leadership Development
• How You Will Learn
• Admission Events
• Personal Information
• GMAT, GRE & EA
• English Proficiency Tests
• Career Change
• Career Advancement
• Career Support and Resources
• Daycare, Schools & Camps
• U.S. Citizens and Permanent Residents
• Requirements
• Requirements: Behavioral
• Requirements: Quantitative
• Requirements: Macro
• Requirements: Micro
• Annual Evaluations
• Field Examination
• Research Activities
• Research Papers
• Dissertation
• Oral Examination
• Current Students
• Education & CV
• International Applicants
• Statement of Purpose
• Reapplicants
• Application Fee Waiver
• Deadline & Decisions
• Job Market Candidates
• Academic Placements
• Stay in Touch
• Faculty Mentors
• Current Fellows
• Standard Track
• Fellowship & Benefits
• Group Enrollment
• Program Formats
• Developing a Program
• Diversity & Inclusion
• Strategic Transformation
• Program Experience
• Contact Client Services
• Campus Experience
• Live Online Experience
• Silicon Valley & Bay Area
• Digital Credentials
• Faculty Spotlights
• Participant Spotlights
• Eligibility
• International Participants
• Stanford Ignite
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Founding Donors
• Program Contacts
• Location Information
• Participant Profile
• Network Membership
• Program Impact
• Collaborators
• Entrepreneur Profiles
• Company Spotlights
• Seed Transformation Network
• Responsibilities
• Current Coaches
• How to Apply
• Meet the Consultants
• Meet the Interns
• Intern Profiles
• Collaborate
• Research Library
• News & Insights
• Databases & Datasets
• Research Guides
• Consultations
• Research Workshops
• Career Research
• Research Data Services
• Course Reserves
• Course Research Guides
• Material Loan Periods
• Fines & Other Charges
• Document Delivery
• Interlibrary Loan
• Equipment Checkout
• Print & Scan
• MBA & MSx Students
• PhD Students
• Other Stanford Students
• Faculty Assistants
• Research Assistants
• Stanford GSB Alumni
• Telling Our Story
• Staff Directory
• Site Registration
• Alumni Directory
• Alumni Email
• Privacy Settings & My Profile
• Event Registration Help
• Success Stories
• The Story of Circles
• Support Women’s Circles
• Stanford Women on Boards Initiative
• Alumnae Spotlights
• Insights & Research
• Industry & Professional
• Entrepreneurial Commitment Group
• Recent Alumni
• Half-Century Club
• Fall Reunions
• Spring Reunions
• MBA 25th Reunion
• Half-Century Club Reunion
• Faculty Lectures
• Ernest C. Arbuckle Award
• Alison Elliott Exceptional Achievement Award
• ENCORE Award
• Excellence in Leadership Award
• John W. Gardner Volunteer Leadership Award
• Robert K. Jaedicke Faculty Award
• Jack McDonald Military Service Appreciation Award
• Jerry I. Porras Latino Leadership Award
• Tapestry Award
• Student & Alumni Events
• Executive Recruiters
• Interviewing
• Land the Perfect Job with LinkedIn
• Negotiating
• Elevator Pitch
• Email Best Practices
• Resumes & Cover Letters
• Self-Assessment
• Whitney Birdwell Ball
• Margaret Brooks
• Bryn Panee Burkhart
• Margaret Chan
• Ricki Frankel
• Peter Gandolfo
• Cindy W. Greig
• Natalie Guillen
• Carly Janson
• Sloan Klein
• Sherri Appel Lassila
• Stuart Meyer
• Tanisha Parrish
• Virginia Roberson
• Philippe Taieb
• Michael Takagawa
• Terra Winston
• Johanna Wise
• Debbie Wolter
• Rebecca Zucker
• Complimentary Coaching
• Changing Careers
• Work-Life Integration
• Career Breaks
• Flexible Work
• Encore Careers
• Join a Board
• D&B Hoovers
• Data Axle (ReferenceUSA)
• EBSCO Business Source
• Global Newsstream
• Market Share Reporter
• ProQuest One Business
• RKMA Market Research Handbook Series
• Student Clubs
• Entrepreneurial Students
• Stanford GSB Trust
• Alumni Community
• How to Volunteer
• Springboard Sessions
• Consulting Projects
• 2020 – 2029
• 2010 – 2019
• 2000 – 2009
• 1990 – 1999
• 1980 – 1989
• 1970 – 1979
• 1960 – 1969
• 1950 – 1959
• 1940 – 1949
• Service Areas
• ACT History
• ACT Awards Celebration
• ACT Governance Structure
• Building Leadership for ACT
• Individual Leadership Positions
• Leadership Role Overview
• Purpose of the ACT Management Board
• Contact ACT
• Business & Nonprofit Communities
• Reunion Volunteers
• Ways to Give
• Fiscal Year Report
• Business School Fund Leadership Council
• Planned Giving Options
• Planned Giving Benefits
• Planned Gifts and Reunions
• Legacy Partners
• Giving News & Stories
• Giving Deadlines
• Development Staff
• Submit Class Notes
• Class Secretaries
• Board of Directors
• Health Care
• Sustainability
• Class Takeaways
• All Else Equal: Making Better Decisions
• If/Then: Business, Leadership, Society
• Grit & Growth
• Think Fast, Talk Smart
• Spring 2022
• Spring 2021
• Autumn 2020
• Summer 2020
• Winter 2020
• In the Media
• For Journalists
• DCI Fellows
• Other Auditors
• Academic Calendar & Deadlines
• Course Materials
• Entrepreneurial Resources
• Campus Drive Grove
• Campus Drive Lawn
• CEMEX Auditorium
• King Community Court
• Seawell Family Boardroom
• Stanford GSB Bowl
• Stanford Investors Common
• Town Square
• Vidalakis Courtyard
• Vidalakis Dining Hall
• Catering Services
• Policies & Guidelines
• Reservations
• Contact Faculty Recruiting
• Lecturer Positions
• Postdoctoral Positions
• Accommodations
• CMC-Managed Interviews
• Recruiter-Managed Interviews
• Virtual Interviews
• Campus & Virtual
• Search for Candidates
• Think Globally
• Recruiting Calendar
• Recruiting Policies
• Full-Time Employment
• Summer Employment
• Entrepreneurial Summer Program
• Global Management Immersion Experience
• Social-Purpose Summer Internships
• Process Overview
• Project Types
• Client Eligibility Criteria
• Client Screening
• ACT Leadership
• Social Innovation & Nonprofit Management Resources
• Develop Your Organization’s Talent
• Centers & Initiatives
• Student Fellowships

Pioneer in the Skies: The Case of Southwest Airlines

• First Online: 29 July 2016

Cite this chapter

• Kai-Ingo Voigt 4 ,
• Oana Buliga 4 &
• Kathrin Michl 4  

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

10k Accesses

Southwest Airlines is a somewhat different example of a business model pioneer—and indeed, one may ask if the company is a pioneer at all: neither was Southwest the first to offer intrastate flights on its home market, Texas, nor was it the first to experiment with low-cost flights. But while the other companies were merely experimenting, Southwest developed a business model, which proved its sustainability over the course of more than four decades. By starting operations in 1971, Southwest faced from the very beginning harsh competition from incumbent airlines. This inspired the young company to create its very own business model—and unlike its main competitors at the time, the airline remains profitable until today. Winning this race made Southwest a prime example of a pioneer in the low-cost airline industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Allegiant Air. (2015). 2014 annual report. Retrieved November 24, 2014, from phx.corporate-ir.net/External.File?item=UGFyZW50SUQ9NTgyMjkxfENoaWxkSUQ9Mjg4NTkyfFR5cGU9MQ==&t=1.

Google Scholar  

Allegiant Travel Company. (n. d.). Company profile. Retrieved January 13, 2015, from https://www.allegiantair.com/sites/default/files/pdf-files/AllegiantCompanyProfilewithHistory.pdf .

American Airlines. (n. d.). A global airline. Retrieved November 19, 2014, from http://www.americanairlines.de/intl/de/aboutUs/globalAirline.jsp .

Boguslaski, C., Ito, H., & Lee, D. (2004). Entry patterns in the Southwest Airlines Route System. Review of Industrial Organization, 25 , 317–350.

Article   Google Scholar  

Borcover, A. (1995). Travelling ticketless in the air. Retrieved August 14, 2015, from http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/1995-03-12/travel/9503070528_1_ticketless-system-ticketless-travel-morris-air .

Breyer, S. G. (1982). Regulation and its reform . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bryant, A. (1995, April 14). Company reports; continental is dropping ‘lite’ service. New York Times . Retrieved November 18, 2014, from http://www.nytimes.com/1995/04/14/business/company-reports-continental-is-dropping-lite-service.html .

Buhalis, D. (2004). eAirlines: Strategic and tactical use of ICTs in the airline industry. Information & Management, 41 , 805–825.

Bunz, U. K., & Maes, J. D. (1998). Learning excellence: Southwest Airlines’ approach. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 8 (3), 163–169.

Carey, S. (2014, October 14). Steep learning curve for Southwest Airlines as it flies overseas: New destinations require changes to training, reservation system. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved July 22, 2015, from http://www.wsj.com/articles/steep-learning-curve-for-southwest-airlines-as-it-flies-overseas-1413326936 .

CBS News. (2014). If Spirit Airlines is so unpopular, why are its flights so full? Retrieved October 10, 2015, from http://www.cbsnews.com/news/if-spirit-airlines-is-so-unpopular-why-are-its-flights-so-full/ .

Conrady, R., Fichert, F., & Sterzenbach, R. (2013). Luftverkehr: Betriebswirtschaftliches Lehr- und Handbuch . München: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.

Book   Google Scholar  

Corkery, M. (2014). Rollin King, Texas pilot who helped start Southwest, dies at 83. Retrieved November 25, 2014, from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/28/business/rollin-king-who-helped-start-southwest-airlines-is-dead-at-83.html?_r=1 .

Cornes, S., & Berniker, L. (2008). Business model innovation. In D. Pantaleo & N. Pal (Eds.), From strategy to execution—Turning accelerated global change into opportunity (pp. 65–86). Berlin: Springer.

Deal, T., & Kennedy, A. (1984). Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life . New York: Perseus.

Delta Airlines. (2014). Stats & facts. Retrieved November 19, 2014, from http://news.delta.com/index.php?s=20306 .

Doganis, R. (2002). Flying off course—The economics of international airlines (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Drexler, K. M. (2007). Icons of business: An encyclopedia of mavericks, movers, and shakers . Westport: Greenwood.

Duening, T. N., Hisrich, R. D., & Lechter, M. A. (2010). Technology entrepreneurship: Creating, capturing, and protecting value . Burlington: Academic.

Eckert, R. (2014). Business Model Prototyping—Geschäftsmodellentwicklung im Hyperwettbewerb. Strategische Überlegenheit als Ziel . Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.

Ganson, B. (2014). Texas takes wing: A century of flight in the lone star state . Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Gibson, J. W., & Blackwell, C. W. (1999). Flying high with Herb Kelleher: A profile of charismatic leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 6 (3/4), 120–137.

Gillen, D. (2006). Airline business models and networks: Regulation, competition and evolution in aviation markets. Review of Network Economics, 5 (4), 366–385.

Gittell, J. (2003). The Southwest Airlines way—Using the power of relationships to achieve high performance. Summaries.Com. Retrieved November 27, 2014, from http://www.theclci.com/resources/thesouthwestairlinesway.pdf .

Hall, A. (2007). Southwest Airlines: The role of human resources in implementing business strategy and hiring practices . Bullard, TX: Capella University.

Hawkins, O., Misra, R., & Tang, H. (2012). Southwest Airlines Co. Griffin Consulting Group. Retrieved November 16, 2014, from http://economics-files.pomona.edu/jlikens/SeniorSeminars/Likens2012/reports/Southwest.pdf .

Heskett, J. L., & Sasser, W. E. (2013, January). Southwest Airlines: In a different world. Harvard Business School Case. Case No. 9-910-419 . Retrieved November 19, 2014, from http://www.eduventures.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/HBS-Case-Southwest-Airlines-In-a-Different-World-CASE.pdf .

Hitt, M., Ireland, D. R., & Hoskisson, R. (2013). Strategic management: Concepts and cases: Competitiveness and globalization (11th ed.). Stanford, CA: Cengage Learning.

Hoffer Gittel, J., von Nordenflycht, A., Kochan, T. A., Bamber, G. J., & McKersie, R. B. (2015). Labor relations and human resources management in the airline industry. In D. Belobaba, A. Odoni, & C. Barnhart (Eds.), The global airline industry (pp. 287–326). Chichester: Wiley.

Jackson, S. E., Schuler, R. S., & Werner, S. (2011). Managing human resources (11th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.

JetBlue. (2015). 2014 annual report . Retrieved October 10, 2015, from http://investor.jetblue.com/~/media/Files/J/Jetblue-IR/Annual%20Reports/2014-ar-10-k.pdf .

Jordan, W. A. (1988). Problems stemming from airline mergers and acquisitions. Transportation Journal, 27 (4), 9–30.

Keidel, R. W. (2010). The geometry of strategy: Concepts for strategic management . New York: Routledge.

Kippenberger, T. (1998). Southwest Airlines: Redefining relationships with customers. The Antidote, 3 (5), 38–39.

Knorr, A. (2007). Southwest Airlines: The low cost pioneer at 35. In S. Groß & A. Schröder (Eds.), Handbook of low cost airlines. Strategies, business processes and market environment (pp. 77–92). Berlin: Erich Schmidt.

Lauer, C. (2010). Southwest Airlines (5th ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood.

Lehrer, H. R. (2000). U.S. Air Carrier after World War II. In T. Brady (Ed.), The American aviation experience: A history (pp. 218–237). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

Lehman, W. (n. d.). US airways: A heritage story. Retrieved November 24, 2014, from http://www.usairways.com/en-US/aboutus/pressroom/history/psa.html .

Meehan, M. (2001, January 1). Develop your web content strategy. Computerworld—IT Agenda 2001, 35 (1) , 20.

Mikhalkina, T. (2014). Netflix business model . London: Cass Business School.

Morrison, S., & Winston, C. (1995). The evolution of the airline industry . Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.

Muduli, A., & Kaura, V. (2011). Southwest Airlines success: A case study analysis. BVIMR Management Edge, 4 (2), 115–118.

Mutzabaugh, B. (2014, February). Southwest announces 15 long routes from Dallas Love Field. USA Today. Retrieved November 19, 2014, from http://www.usatoday.com/story/todayinthesky/2014/02/03/southwest-announces-15-long-routes-from-dallas-love-field/5179781/ .

Noack, T. (n. d.). Air California fleet details and history . Retrieved November 19, 2014, from http://www.planespotters.net/Airline/Air-California .

Nykiel, R. A. (2007). Handbook of marketing research methodologies for hospitality and tourism . Binghamton, NY: Haworth Hospitality & Tourism Press.

Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation—A handbook of visionaries, game changers and challengers . Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Petzinger, T., Jr. (1996). Hard landing: The epic contest for power and profits that plunged the airlines into chaos . New York: Three Rivers Press.

Platt, H. D. (1985). Why companies fail: Strategies for detecting, avoiding, and profiting from bankruptcy . Washington, DC: Beard Books.

Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review , November–December:61–78.

Raynor, M. E. (2011). Disruptive innovation: The Southwest Airlines case revisited. Strategy & Leadership, 39 (4), 31–34.

Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum. (2007). Air travel in a changing America. Retrieved November 29, 2014, from https://airandspace.si.edu/exhibitions/america-by-air/online/jetage/jetage04.cfm .

Southwest Airlines Co. (2004). Southwest Airlines Co. 2003 annual report. Retrieved November 19, 2014, from http://southwest.investorroom.com/download/2003+Annual+Report.pdf .

Southwest Airlines Co. (2008). Southwest Airlines Co. annual report 2007. Retrieved November 19, 2014, from http://southwest.investorroom.com/download/2007+Annual+Report.pdf .

Southwest Airlines Co. (2010). Southwest Airlines Co. 2009 annual report to shareholders. Retrieved November 19, 2014, from http://southwest.investorroom.com/download/2009+Annual+Report.pdf .

Southwest Airlines Co. (2011). Southwest Airlines closes acquisition of AirTran Holdings, Inc.. Retrieved August 14, 2015, from http://www.swamedia.com/releases/Southwest-Airlines-Closes-Acquisition-of-AirTran-Holdings-Inc?mode=print .

Southwest Airlines Co. (2014a). Southwest Airlines Co. 2013 annual report to shareholders. Retrieved November 14, 2014, from http://southwest.investorroom.com/download/2013+Annual+Report.pdf .

Southwest Airlines Co. (2014b). These fees don’t fly with us. Retrieved November 14, 2014, from http://www.southwest.com/html/air/no-fees.html .

Southwest Airlines Co. (2014c). Bags Fly Free®. Retrieved November 14, 2014, from http://www.southwest.com/html/air/bags-fly-free.html .

Southwest Airlines Co. (2015a). Herbert D. Kelleher . Retrieved January 24, 2015, from http://www.swamedia.com/channels/Officer-Biographies/pages/herb_kelleher .

Southwest Airlines Co. (2015b). Checked baggage . Retrieved July 22, 2015, from https://www.southwest.com/html/customer-service/baggage/checked-bags-pol.html .

Southwest Airlines Co. (2015c). 1966 to 1971 . Retrieved August 13, 2015, from http://swamedia.com/channels/By-Date/pages/1966-to-1971 .

Southwest Airlines Co. (2015d). 1972 to 1978 . Retrieved August 13, 2015, from http://swamedia.com/channels/By-Date/pages/1972-to-1978 .

Southwest Airlines Co. (2015e). 1979 to 1981 . Retrieved August 13, 2015, from http://swamedia.com/channels/By-Date/pages/1979-to-1981 .

Southwest Airlines Co. (2015f). 2011 to present . Retrieved August 13, 2015, from http://swamedia.com/channels/By-Date/pages/2011-to-present .

Southwest Airlines Co. (2015g). Major initiatives. Retrieved August 14, 2015, from http://swamedia.com/channels/By-Category/pages/major-initiatives .

Southwest Airlines Co. (2015h). Southwest corporate fact sheet . Retrieved October 10, 2015, from http://swamedia.com/channels/Corporate-Fact-Sheet/pages/corporate-fact-sheet#dailydepartures .

Southwest Airlines Co. (2015i). Southwest Airlines enters the international long-haul market . Retrieved August 1, 2015, from http://www.eturbonews.com/print/56264 .

Spirit Airlines. (2015). Form 10-K. Retrieved October 10, 2015, from http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/ABEA-5PAQQ9/839809684x0x818446/85F2240B-211D-46BD-B789-37B88FB5935E/Spirit_10K.pdf .

Statista. (2015a). Größte Airlines weltweit im Jahr 2014 nach Umsatz (in Milliarden US-Dollar). Retrieved August 13, 2015, from http://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/3151/umfrage/die-groessten-airlines-weltweit-nach-umsatz-in-milliarden-euro/ .

Statista. (2015b). Größte US-Fluggesellschaften im Jahr 2014 nach Umsatz (in Milliarden US-Dollar). Retrieved August 13, 2015, from http://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/244597/umfrage/umsatz-der-groessten-us-fluggesellschaften/ .

Statista. (2015c). Top 100 Airlines weltweit nach der Anzahl der Passagiere im Jahr 2014 (in Millionen). Retrieved August 13, 2015, from http://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/162992/umfrage/top-10-fluglinien-weltweit-nach-der-anzahl-der-passagiere/ .

Statista. (2015d). Form 10-K . Retrieved August 13, 2015, from http://de.statista.com/download/MTQzOTQ2NTQwNyMjNTY3MDQjIzI4MDQ3IyMxIyNudWxsIyNTdHVkeQ==

Swelbar, W. S., & Belobaba, P. P. (2014). An introduction to the airline data project. MIT International Center for Air Transportation. Retrieved December 2, 2014, from http://web.mit.edu/airlinedata/www/2013%2012%20Month%20Documents/ADP_introduction.pdf .

Swelbar, W. S., & Belobaba, P. P. (n. d.). Glossary. Retrieved December 2, 2014, from http://web.mit.edu/airlinedata/www/Res_Glossary.html .

Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43 , 172–194.

Virgin America. (2015). Virgin America reports fourth quarter and full year 2014 earnings. Retrieved October 10, 2015, from https://www.virginamerica.com/cms/about-our-airline/press/2015/virgin-america-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2014-earnings .

Virgin America. (n. d.). About Virgin America. Retrieved January 13, 2015, from https://www.virginamerica.com/cms/about-our-airline/corporate-facts .

Watts, B. (2013). The Girard/Pucci years . Retrieved August 10, 2015, from http://www.braniffpages.com/1965/1965.html .

Welles, E. O. (1992). Captain Marvel. Retrieved January 12, 2015, from https://assurantcorp.com/inc/eexcel/resources/e.excel_ia_case_captmarvel.pdf .

Wells, P. E. (2013). Business models for sustainability . Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Wu, C. L., & Caves, R. E. (2007). Modelling and optimization of aircraft turnaround time at an airport. Transportation Planning and Technology, 27 (1), 47–66.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Chair of Industrial Management, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany

Kai-Ingo Voigt, Oana Buliga & Kathrin Michl

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Voigt, KI., Buliga, O., Michl, K. (2017). Pioneer in the Skies: The Case of Southwest Airlines. In: Business Model Pioneers. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38845-8_14

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38845-8_14

Published : 29 July 2016

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-319-38844-1

Online ISBN : 978-3-319-38845-8

eBook Packages : Business and Management Business and Management (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

• +(91)-9036276981
• [email protected]

Case Study: Profitability Takes Flight, Southwest Airlines Unique Business Model Unveiled

Southwest Airlines is a renowned American low-cost airline established in 1967 and has since become one of the industry’s most successful and profitable carriers.

With its headquarters in Dallas, Texas, Southwest operates an extensive domestic network, serving more than 100 destinations across the United States.

Significance of Profitability in The Airline Industry

Profitability is a critical aspect of any business, and the airline industry is no exception. Achieving consistent profitability is a significant challenge in an industry characterized by intense competition, volatile fuel prices, and economic uncertainties.

However, Southwest Airlines has managed to stand out from its competitors with its unique and highly successful business model.

Southwest Airlines’ Unique Business Model

Southwest Airlines was founded on providing customers with low-cost, efficient, and reliable air travel.

From the outset, its founders aimed to differentiate Southwest from traditional carriers by implementing a business model that focused on simplicity, operational efficiency, and a strong emphasis on customer satisfaction.

Critical Elements of the Business Model

Here are the key elements of Southwest Airlines’ prestigious business model:

Low-cost operations

Southwest Airlines has distinguished itself as a low-cost carrier by implementing various cost-saving strategies.

These include utilizing a single aircraft type (Boeing 737) to simplify maintenance and training, operating from secondary airports to reduce fees, and minimizing unnecessary frills such as assigned seating and in-flight meals.

High Aircraft Utilization

Southwest maximizes the utilization of its aircraft by keeping them in the air for a significant portion of the day.

Quick turnarounds, efficient boarding processes, and high aircraft utilization rates contribute to cost savings and increased revenue potential.

Point-to-Point Routes

Unlike traditional hub-and-spoke models that many airlines employ, Southwest’s point-to-point route system allows direct flights between smaller airports, reducing transfer times and increasing operational efficiency.

This approach also enables Southwest to serve niche markets and respond quickly to changing demand.

Customer-Centric Approach

Southwest Airlines places a strong emphasis on customer service and satisfaction. Southwest has built a loyal customer base with its “Bags Fly Free” policy, no change fees, and friendly customer service.

The airline strives to provide a hassle-free and enjoyable flying experience, differentiating itself from competitors.

Efficient Workforce Management

Southwest focuses on building a stable and motivated workforce. The company’s employee-friendly policies and positive company culture have resulted in high employee satisfaction and productivity.

The airline’s efficient workforce management contributes to operational efficiency and cost control.

Case Study: Southwest Airlines’ Profitability

Southwest Airlines has consistently reported profits for several consecutive years, even during industry downturns and economic challenges.

This remarkable achievement sets Southwest apart from many other airlines struggling to maintain profitability.

Factors Contributing to Profitability:

Many different elements are responsible for the continuous progress of the airline. Some of the critical factors that played a crucial role in Southwest Airlines’ profitability include the following:

Strategic Route Planning

Southwest strategically selects routes that align with its business model, focusing on high-demand and high-frequency routes.

This approach allows the airline to optimize revenue potential while minimizing operational complexities.

Cost Leadership and Operational Efficiency

Southwest’s relentless focus on cost reduction and operational efficiency has significantly driven its profitability.

The airline maintains a competitive advantage in the industry by keeping costs low and implementing efficient operational practices.

Revenue Management Strategies

Southwest employs effective revenue management strategies, including dynamic pricing and capacity management.

These strategies ensure optimal seat utilization and maximize revenue per available seat mile (RASM).

Strong Customer Loyalty and Brand Reputation

Southwest’s commitment to customer satisfaction has resulted in a strong brand reputation and customer loyalty.

Repeat business and positive word-of-mouth recommendations contribute to sustained revenue and profitability.

Challenges and Limitations of Southwest’s Model

Here are some challenges and limitations faced by one of the most successful Airlines in the United States. 

Vulnerability to Fuel Price Fluctuations

Like any airline, Southwest is exposed to the volatility of fuel prices. Increases in fuel costs can significantly impact the airline’s profitability, as fuel represents a substantial portion of its operating expenses.

Fluctuations in fuel prices require Southwest to employ effective fuel hedging strategies and closely monitor its fuel efficiency to mitigate risks.

Limited International Presence

While Southwest has been highly successful in the domestic market, its international operations could be more extensive.

The airline primarily focuses on serving domestic destinations, which may pose challenges in expanding its market reach and tapping into lucrative international markets where competition may be fierce.

Potential Risks of Focusing On the Domestic Market

Relying heavily on the domestic market exposes Southwest to potential risks associated with economic fluctuations, regulatory changes, and geopolitical events that could impact domestic air travel demand.

Diversifying its operations to include more international destinations could mitigate these risks.

Southwest Airlines’ Response to Challenges

Fuel Hedging Strategies

Southwest employs fuel hedging strategies to mitigate the risks associated with fuel price fluctuations.

These strategies involve entering into contracts to secure future fuel purchases at predetermined prices, reducing the impact of sudden price increases.

Expansion of International Routes

Recognizing the growth potential in international markets, Southwest has gradually expanded its global operations.

By adding more international destinations to its network, the airline aims to diversify its revenue streams and reduce reliance on the domestic market.

Mitigation Plans for Market Risks

Southwest monitors market trends, economic indicators, and regulatory changes to adjust its operations and strategies proactively.

The airline maintains an elegant approach, quickly adapting to changing market conditions and mitigating potential risks.

If you want to know further, an inclusive case study solution can help you the right way.

Southwest Airlines case study solution , written by experts, lets you take a comprehensive look into the airline’s history, profitability model, challenges, how they tackled them, and many other aspects.

Conclusion:

Southwest Airlines has established a unique and highly successful business model that centers around low-cost operations, efficient utilization of resources, and a customer-centric approach.

Its focus on simplicity, operational efficiency, and customer satisfaction has contributed to its profitability and competitive advantage in the airline industry.

Southwest Airlines’ profitability stands out in an industry often plagued by financial challenges.

The airline’s ability to consistently generate profits can be attributed to its distinctive business model, which enables cost leadership, operational efficiency, and strong customer loyalty.

Southwest’s success serves as a valuable case study for the airline industry. It highlights the importance of innovation, adaptability, and a customer-centric approach in achieving profitability and sustainable growth.

Other airlines can learn from Southwest’s strategies and consider adopting elements of its business model to enhance their own competitiveness and financial performance.

Read more case studies here .

Streamlyn Academy is a digital marketing institute that delivers Internet Marketing & Programmatic Advertising courses to industry executives, entrepreneurs, and recent graduates.

• Digital marketing courses in Bangalore
• #34, Koramangala 4th Block, Near Sony World Junction 80ft Road, AVS Layout, 20th L Cross Road Bengaluru, Karnataka 560034
• +(91)-9036276981 , +(91)-9883790299

Quick Links

• Our Courses
• Certifications
• Corporate Training
• Hire From Us
• Write for Us

Information

• Privacy Policy
• Terms & Conditions
• Cookie Policy

Streamlyn Media

• © Copyright 2015-2024 Streamlyn Academy | All rights reserved

Your details have been submitted successfully.

Our team will get back to you shortly., we have received your message., someone from our team will contact you soon., thank you for enquiring about our course., our student counsellor will connect with you shortly., our academic counselor will contact you to schedule a demo as per your convenient time, for downloading our free digital marketing guide, we have sent the guide to the mail id provided. please check..

To read this content please select one of the options below:

Please note you do not have access to teaching notes, disruptive innovation: the southwest airlines case revisited.

Strategy & Leadership

ISSN : 1087-8572

Article publication date: 5 July 2011

The standard explanation of Southwest's success is that it applied a low‐cost competitive strategy. This paper aims to address this issue.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper argues that Southwest was actually employing a disruptive strategy. Financial data show that Southwest's results were highly variable during the time it was growing into a national carrier.

The paper finds that Southwest's disruptive strategy of innovative operational cost reduction did not produce striking financial returns until it adopted more efficient aircraft, which made its fuel costs competitive.

Practical implications

Cost efficiencies alone do not make a firm a disruptor. What is required is the combination of a low‐cost business model and enabling technologies.

Originality/value

This paper points out that managers should learn to see operational innovations and cost savings in the context of disruption, not just price advantage.

• Competitive strategy
• Low‐cost strategy
• Low‐cost carrier
• Industry disruptor
• Point‐to‐point route
• Cost‐cutting innovations
• Disruptive innovation
• Disruption theory
• Delivery services

Raynor, M.E. (2011), "Disruptive innovation: the Southwest Airlines case revisited", Strategy & Leadership , Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 31-34. https://doi.org/10.1108/10878571111147387

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2011, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles

All feedback is valuable.

Please share your general feedback

Report an issue or find answers to frequently asked questions

Contact Customer Support

• Business Ideas
• Super Guides
• Innovation Report
• Canvas Examples
• Presentations
• Spreadsheets
• Discounted Bundles
• Search for:

No products in the cart.

Return to shop

Southwest Airlines SWOT Analysis

Southwest Airlines, a major player in the airline industry, is known for its affordable fares, exemplary customer service, and unique business model. This Southwest Airlines SWOT analysis provides critical insight into the company’s strategies, operations, and market position, making it essential for stakeholders, investors, and competitors.

Southwest Airlines , founded in 1967 by Herb Kelleher and Rollin King, has transformed the aviation landscape with its low-cost, point-to-point service model. The company has consistently focused on maintaining low operating costs and delivering excellent customer service. This approach has resulted in strong brand loyalty and a solid market position, distinguishing Southwest from other airlines in the industry.

The company’s continuous efforts to expand its route network, enhance its fleet, and adopt innovative technologies have played a significant role in its success. However, Southwest Airlines also faces challenges, such as intense competition, fluctuating fuel prices, and regulatory issues, which can impact its growth and profitability.

This Southwest Airlines SWOT Analysis delves into the company’s core strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats to comprehensively understand its competitive advantages and challenges. 

Southwest Airlines Strengths

Strong Brand Recognition and Reputation

Southwest Airlines has effectively built a strong brand identity that resonates with customers. The company’s brand is synonymous with affordable fares, excellent customer service, and a friendly, laid-back attitude, encapsulated in its tagline, “Low fares. Nothing to hide”. This strong brand recognition has been cultivated over years of consistent service and has been a critical factor in Southwest’s success. As a result, customers recognize and trust the Southwest brand, and this loyalty often translates into repeat business.

Southwest Airlines’ reputation also extends beyond its customer base. The company is frequently lauded for its management practices and corporate culture, often appearing on lists of the best companies to work for. This positive reputation helps Southwest attract and retain top talent, which ultimately contributes to its continued success.

Excellent Operational Efficiency

A key strength of Southwest Airlines is its operational efficiency. Unlike the traditional hub-and-spoke model, the airline’s point-to-point service model allows for quick turnaround times and more efficient aircraft use. Additionally, Southwest only uses one type of aircraft – the Boeing 737. This uniformity reduces costs associated with maintenance, training, and parts inventory.

Southwest’s operational efficiency also extends to its workforce. The company’s employees are known for their productivity and strong work ethic, which has resulted in one of the industry’s lowest cost structures. This efficiency allows Southwest to maintain its low-fare strategy, a key competitive advantage.

Exceptional Customer Service

Southwest Airlines is renowned for its customer service. The company’s commitment to providing a positive customer experience is a core part of its business strategy and has been a significant factor in its success. Southwest’s employees are empowered to go the extra mile for customers, resulting in numerous stories of exceptional service that have enhanced the company’s reputation.

This focus on customer service extends to Southwest’s transparent pricing policy. For example, unlike many competitors, Southwest does not charge fees for checked bags or flight changes. This straightforward, customer-friendly approach has earned the airline a loyal customer base and has distinguished it in a highly competitive industry.

Profitability and Financial Stability

Southwest Airlines’ business model has allowed it to be profitable for over 40 consecutive years, a notable achievement in the volatile airline industry. The company’s focus on operational efficiency, cost control, and strong revenue generation has resulted in robust financial performance.

The company has a healthy balance sheet, with substantial cash reserves and manageable debt levels. This financial stability allows Southwest to invest in growth opportunities, weather economic downturns, and provide returns to shareholders. The airline’s strong financial performance and stability underscore its success and potential for future growth.

Employee-Centric Culture

Southwest Airlines is known for its unique, employee-centric corporate culture. The company firmly believes that happy employees lead to satisfied customers. As such, it invests significantly in employee training and development and fosters an environment of respect, transparency, and fun.

This employee-centric culture has resulted in high employee satisfaction and low turnover rates. Additionally, it has cultivated a strong sense of loyalty and camaraderie among employees, contributing to the airline’s high customer service and operational efficiency.

Strong Leadership

Southwest Airlines has benefited from strong, consistent leadership. The company’s co-founder, Herb Kelleher, is often credited with creating Southwest’s unique corporate culture and successful business model. The current leadership has continued to uphold Kelleher’s values and strategic vision, guiding the company through industry challenges and growth opportunities.

This strong leadership has provided stability and strategic direction for Southwest, contributing to its long-term success. It has also positioned the airline to navigate future industry challenges and capitalize on growth opportunities.

Sustainability Initiatives

Southwest Airlines is committed to sustainability, which is increasingly vital to today’s environmentally conscious consumers. The company has implemented various initiatives aimed at reducing its environmental impact, including investing in more fuel-efficient aircraft, implementing fuel-saving operational procedures, and supporting the development of sustainable aviation fuels.

Southwest’s commitment to sustainability not only helps reduce its environmental footprint but also enhances its reputation among customers, employees, and investors. This focus on sustainability can potentially provide Southwest with a competitive advantage as consumer preferences evolve and regulatory pressures increase.

Southwest Airlines Weaknesses 

Limited international presence

While Southwest Airlines has a dominant presence in the domestic U.S. market, its international presence is relatively limited compared to some of its competitors. The company mainly operates flights within the United States, with a smaller number of international routes to destinations in Mexico, Central America, and the Caribbean. This lack of diversification in its route network may limit Southwest’s ability to capitalize on growth opportunities in other markets and makes the company more vulnerable to fluctuations in the U.S. market.

Expanding its international presence could help Southwest reduce its dependence on the U.S. market and tap into new sources of revenue. However, doing so would require significant investments in infrastructure, resources, and regulatory approvals, as well as adapting to different market conditions and customer preferences.

Dependence on the Boeing 737 aircraft

Southwest Airlines operates an all-Boeing 737 fleet, which has helped the company streamline its operations, reduce costs, and maintain a consistent customer experience. However, this reliance on a single aircraft type also exposes Southwest to risks associated with the performance and safety of the Boeing 737. For example, the grounding of the Boeing 737 MAX following two fatal crashes had a significant impact on Southwest’s operations and finances, as the airline was one of the largest customers of the aircraft.

Diversifying its fleet with different aircraft types could help Southwest mitigate risks associated with relying on a single aircraft model. However, doing so could also increase complexity in operations, maintenance, and crew training, potentially offsetting some of the cost benefits of operating a single fleet type.

Labor relations and union issues

As an airline with a large workforce, Southwest has experienced occasional labor disputes and union issues. These disputes can lead to operational disruptions, increased labor costs, and negative publicity for the company. Maintaining positive labor relations is crucial for Southwest to ensure smooth operations and maintain its reputation as an employer of choice.

Addressing labor concerns proactively and fostering a culture of collaboration and open communication can help Southwest minimize the risk of labor disputes and maintain a motivated and engaged workforce.

Intense competition in the airline industry

The airline industry is highly competitive, with numerous carriers vying for market share. Southwest faces competition from both legacy carriers, such as American Airlines and Delta, and low-cost carriers, such as Spirit Airlines and Frontier Airlines. This intense competition can lead to downward pressure on fares, which can impact Southwest’s profitability and market share.

To stay competitive in this challenging environment, Southwest needs to continue focusing on cost control, operational efficiency, and delivering a superior customer experience. Innovation in service offerings and exploring new revenue streams, such as ancillary services, can also help Southwest differentiate itself from its competitors.

Vulnerability to external factors

Like other airlines, Southwest is vulnerable to various external factors, including economic conditions, geopolitical events, and fluctuations in fuel prices. For example, economic downturns can lead to reduced demand for air travel, while geopolitical events can impact international travel and tourism. Similarly, volatility in fuel prices can have a significant impact on Southwest’s operating costs, as fuel is one of the most significant expenses for airlines.

While Southwest has implemented various measures to hedge against fuel price fluctuations and manage the impact of external factors on its business, the airline industry remains inherently vulnerable to these risks. Staying agile, focusing on cost control, and continuously adapting to changing market conditions can help Southwest navigate these challenges and maintain its competitive edge.

Potential impact of negative publicity

Southwest, like other airlines, is susceptible to the potential impact of negative publicity. Incidents such as customer service issues, labor disputes, or safety concerns can quickly garner media attention and harm the company’s reputation. In today’s digital age, negative news can spread rapidly through social media, potentially impacting customer perception and loyalty.

To mitigate the risk of negative publicity, Southwest needs to maintain high standards in customer service, safety, and operations. It also needs to have effective crisis management strategies in place to respond quickly and appropriately to any incidents that may occur. Transparency, swift action, and open communication can help manage such situations effectively and minimize their impact on the company’s reputation.

Southwest Airlines Opportunities

Expansion Into International Markets

While Southwest Airlines has a strong presence in the United States, it has an opportunity to expand its operations into international markets. This can open up new revenue streams and diversify the company’s geographical portfolio, reducing its dependence on the U.S. market. Though international expansion may involve navigating through regulatory hurdles and cultural differences, the potential gains are substantial, considering the size and growth of the global aviation market.

Leveraging Digital Transformation

Digital transformation represents a significant opportunity for Southwest Airlines. By harnessing cutting-edge technologies such as data analytics, artificial intelligence (AI), and machine learning, the company can enhance operational efficiency, improve customer experience, and drive revenue growth. For instance, data analytics can help Southwest predict passenger trends and optimize routes, while AI and machine learning can be utilized to personalize customer interactions and improve customer service.

Increasing Demand for Low-Cost Carriers

As budget-conscious travelers continue to seek value for money, the demand for low-cost carriers like Southwest Airlines is expected to rise. This trend presents an opportunity for Southwest to attract new customers and increase its market share. The company can leverage its reputation for affordable fares, high-quality service, and operational efficiency to capitalize on this growing market segment.

Sustainable Aviation

With increasing attention to climate change, there is a growing interest in sustainable aviation. Southwest Airlines can seize this opportunity by further investing in fuel-efficient aircraft, adopting sustainable aviation fuels, and implementing environmentally friendly practices. Such initiatives can not only reduce the company’s environmental footprint, but also enhance its brand image and appeal to eco-conscious customers and investors.

Strategic Partnerships and Alliances

Southwest Airlines can explore opportunities for strategic partnerships and alliances to expand its network, enhance its service offerings, and increase its customer base. Partnerships with other airlines can provide Southwest with access to new routes and markets. At the same time, alliances with hotels, car rental companies, and tourism boards can enhance the overall travel experience for its customers. These collaborations can help Southwest Airlines to provide more value to its customers, gain a competitive advantage, and drive growth.

Growth in the Cargo Business

The air cargo business is witnessing considerable growth, driven by the rise of e-commerce and the need for fast, reliable delivery of goods. Southwest Airlines can tap into this opportunity by expanding its cargo operations. This can provide an additional revenue stream and help the company to maximize the utilization of its existing fleet.

Diversification of Revenue Streams

While ticket sales form a significant portion of the airline’s revenue, Southwest has an opportunity to diversify its revenue streams. This could involve expanding ancillary services such as in-flight sales, baggage fees, or premium seating options. It could also explore non-aviation-related ventures, such as travel insurance or vacation packages. Such diversification can provide financial stability by mitigating risks associated with fluctuations in ticket sales.

Investment in Customer Service and Experience

In the highly competitive airline industry, customer service and experience can be key differentiators. Southwest Airlines has an opportunity to invest further in enhancing its customer service and in-flight experience. This could involve training and development for its customer service staff, improving in-flight amenities, or leveraging technology to simplify booking and check-in processes. These efforts can help to increase customer satisfaction, loyalty, and repeat business.

Developing Health and Safety Measures

In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, health and safety have become paramount considerations for travelers. Southwest Airlines has an opportunity to develop and implement robust health and safety measures to reassure passengers and encourage travel. This can involve regular deep cleaning of aircraft, enforcing mask policies, and implementing touchless procedures where possible. By prioritizing passenger health and safety, Southwest can build trust and confidence among its customers in the post-pandemic world.

Southwest Airlines Threats 

Economic downturns and fluctuating fuel prices

Like all airlines, Southwest Airlines is vulnerable to economic downturns and fluctuations in fuel prices. During periods of economic recession, demand for air travel can significantly decrease as both leisure and business travelers cut back on their travel expenses. This can lead to lower revenues and profitability for Southwest.

Similarly, Southwest’s operations are significantly impacted by the cost of aviation fuel. Fluctuations in fuel prices can directly affect the company’s operating costs and profitability. While Southwest has a strategy of fuel hedging to manage this risk, unexpected sharp increases in fuel prices can still pose a significant threat to the company’s financial performance.

The airline industry is highly competitive, with several large and small carriers vying for market share. Southwest competes not only with other low-cost carriers, but also with major airlines that offer a broader range of services and amenities.

The emergence of ultra-low-cost carriers, which offer extremely low base fares with additional charges for extras, has increased the competitive pressure on Southwest. These carriers can potentially lure away price-sensitive customers, impacting Southwest’s market share and profitability.

Regulatory risks and potential increases in operational costs

Southwest Airlines operates in a highly regulated environment, which can pose various risks. Changes in aviation regulations, environmental laws, or safety standards can lead to increased operational costs and affect the company’s profitability.

Furthermore, potential increases in airport fees, taxes, and labor costs also pose a threat to Southwest. The company’s ability to manage these costs and maintain its low-cost operating model is crucial for its long-term success.

Technological disruptions and cybersecurity threats

As the airline industry becomes increasingly digital, Southwest Airlines faces the risk of technological disruptions and cybersecurity threats. The company relies heavily on its IT systems for various functions, including ticket sales, flight operations, and customer service. Disruptions to these systems, whether due to technical issues or cyberattacks, can cause significant operational disruptions and harm the company’s reputation.

Moreover, the increasing prevalence of cyber threats poses a significant risk to Southwest. The company handles large volumes of sensitive customer data, and a data breach could lead to legal liabilities, financial losses, and damage to the company’s reputation.

Risks associated with climate change and environmental concerns

Climate change and increasing environmental concerns pose a significant threat to the airline industry. Airlines are under increasing pressure from regulators, investors, and consumers to reduce their environmental impact, particularly their carbon emissions.

While Southwest has taken steps towards sustainability, the company still faces potential risks. These include regulatory risks associated with potential carbon taxes or emissions trading schemes, operational risks associated with more frequent and severe weather events due to climate change, and reputational risks if the company is perceived as not doing enough to address its environmental impact.

Potential impacts of public health crises

The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated the significant threat that public health crises can pose to airlines. The pandemic led to a dramatic decrease in air travel demand, causing significant financial losses for airlines, including Southwest. While the industry is recovering, future public health crises could have similar impacts.

Moreover, public health crises can also lead to increased operational costs due to increased health and safety measures. For example, Southwest has had to invest in enhanced cleaning procedures and protective equipment for its employees in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Southwest Airlines SWOT analysis highlights the company’s numerous strengths, such as its low-cost business model, strong brand recognition, extensive route network, and commitment to sustainability. These strengths have allowed Southwest to become a significant player in the highly competitive airline industry and have contributed to its continued success.

However, the analysis also reveals weaknesses and potential threats that the company must address, including reliance on a single type of aircraft, vulnerability to fuel price fluctuations, and increasing competition. Southwest Airlines must continue to innovate and adapt to changing market conditions to maintain its competitive edge and capitalize on opportunities for growth.

By focusing on its core strengths and addressing its weaknesses and threats, Southwest Airlines can continue to thrive in the airline industry and deliver exceptional value to its customers, employees, and shareholders. Overall, the SWOT analysis serves as a valuable tool for understanding the company’s current position and potential future trajectory, providing insights that can help guide strategic decision-making for Southwest Airlines.

Who is Daniel Pereira ?

I love understanding strategy and innovation using the business model canvas tool so much that I decided to share my analysis by creating a website focused on this topic.

More About Me

Related Posts

Jollibee SWOT Analysis

In 1975, Jollibee, a famous fast-food company worldwide, was founded in the Philippines. Tony Tan [...]

Spotify SWOT Analysis

Spotify is a leading global audio streaming platform that revolutionized how people listen to music [...]

Sephora SWOT Analysis

This Sephora SWOT analysis comprehensively evaluates the company’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Sephora is [...]

Accenture SWOT Analysis

Accenture is a prominent global consulting and professional services company that has carved a niche [...]

Tesla SWOT Analysis

Tesla, Inc. is by far one of the most well-known companies in the world. As [...]

Peloton SWOT Analysis

Peloton is a rapidly growing and innovative fitness technology company that has revolutionized the way [...]

Chipotle SWOT Analysis

Chipotle is an American fast-food chain specializing in Mexican cuisine. It was founded in 1993 [...]

Lululemon SWOT Analysis

With its rapid expansion and loyal customer base, Lululemon has emerged as a critical player [...]

RECEIVE OUR UPDATES

Username or email address  *

Password  *

Remember me Log in

Lost your password?

•  Sign into My Research
•  Create My Research Account
• Company Website
• Our Products
• About Dissertations
• Español (España)
• Support Center

Select language

• Bahasa Indonesia
• Português (Brasil)
• Português (Portugal)

Welcome to My Research!

You may have access to the free features available through My Research. You can save searches, save documents, create alerts and more. Please log in through your library or institution to check if you have access.

Translate this article into 20 different languages!

If you log in through your library or institution you might have access to this article in multiple languages.

Get access to 20+ different citations styles

Styles include MLA, APA, Chicago and many more. This feature may be available for free if you log in through your library or institution.

Looking for a PDF of this document?

You may have access to it for free by logging in through your library or institution.

Want to save this document?

You may have access to different export options including Google Drive and Microsoft OneDrive and citation management tools like RefWorks and EasyBib. Try logging in through your library or institution to get access to these tools.

• More like this
• Preview Available
• Scholarly Journal

Southwest Airlines: A Case Study Linking Employee Needs Satisfaction and Organizational Capabilities to Competitive Advantage

No items selected

Please select one or more items.

Select results items first to use the cite, email, save, and export options

This is a limited preview of the full PDF

Try and log in through your library or institution to see if they have access.

It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader

Suggested sources

• About ProQuest
• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy
• Cookie Policy

• Harvard Business School →
• Faculty & Research →
• winter 1996
• Human Resource Management

Southwest Airlines: A Case Study Linking Employee Needs Satisfaction and Organizational Capabilities to Competitive Advantage

• Format: Print

More from the Author

• First Quarter 2018

Beyond Engagement

• Faculty Research

Royal Philips N.V.

Securitas uae: entering qatar with csr.

• Beyond Engagement  By: Roger Hallowell, Hervé Coyco and Randall White
• Royal Philips N.V.  By: Roger Hallowell
• Securitas UAE: Entering Qatar with CSR  By: Roger Hallowell

Southwest Airlines’ Competitive Strategy and Future Case Study

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

Southwest Airlines uses various approaches to achieve its competitive advantage. The airline’s current strategy focuses on reducing costs to attract and retain more passengers. This firm has gained a cost advantage by using its low-cost model. It has been charging reduced fares to become the leading player in the industry. The firm has also fitted its planes with comfortable seats. It has also acquired cost-efficient crafts to reduce costs.

These approaches have made it possible for Southwest Airlines to remain competitive. The firm has also gained a differentiation advantage by maintaining low costs for its passengers. The 15-minutes turnaround approach has been used to minimize costs. This strategy reduces operational costs because different individuals work as teams. The differentiation strategy has increased the company’s brand loyalty.

The company should identify new competitive strategies to gain a future cost advantage. For instance, the firm can offer reduced prices to its customers. This can be achieved by purchasing large aircraft. Discounts should also be offered on specific occasions to attract more clients. The firm can use alternatives to produce a new differentiation advantage. The airline company can have different aircraft especially after acquiring AirTran. The firm can offer free internet services and better loyalty programs for its customers. The targeted passengers should be equipped with new resources such as free internet (Wi-Fi), proper customer support, comfortable seats, and loyalty programs. Such strategies will eventually make the firm more profitable.

Several competitive strategies can be used to support Southwest’s future goals. The first strategy should focus on the weaknesses and opportunities identified in the SWOT analysis. To begin with, the firm can purchase large aircraft. Such aircraft should also be fuel-efficient. More people are willing to use air transport. The firm can target such individuals using quality services. Many students are getting new skills in business management. The company should hire such graduates to deliver quality services to targeted passengers. The company can also improve the level of security. The firm can also improve its services by offering free meals and by using Online Reservation Systems (ORS). Proper leadership practices will also be required to deliver the best services.

Hitt, M., Ireland, R., & Hoskisson, R. (2010). Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

• Why the Luxury Industry Takes the M&A Strategy?
• Tiffany & Co. Retailer's Strategic Recommendations
• Why People Should Invest in Southwest Airlines
• Southwest Airlines Business Strategy
• Southwest Airlines
• Coca-Cola and Pepsi Companies' Competitive Dynamics
• Strategic Purpose as Integral Organisation Part
• Business Strategies Diverse Concepts
• Technology Company's Innovation and Funding
• Hardball Strategies for Trouncing the Competition
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2021, April 5). Southwest Airlines' Competitive Strategy and Future. https://ivypanda.com/essays/southwest-airlines-competitive-strategy-and-future/

"Southwest Airlines' Competitive Strategy and Future." IvyPanda , 5 Apr. 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/southwest-airlines-competitive-strategy-and-future/.

IvyPanda . (2021) 'Southwest Airlines' Competitive Strategy and Future'. 5 April.

IvyPanda . 2021. "Southwest Airlines' Competitive Strategy and Future." April 5, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/southwest-airlines-competitive-strategy-and-future/.

1. IvyPanda . "Southwest Airlines' Competitive Strategy and Future." April 5, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/southwest-airlines-competitive-strategy-and-future/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Southwest Airlines' Competitive Strategy and Future." April 5, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/southwest-airlines-competitive-strategy-and-future/.