mutation research paper pdf

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Research Briefing
• Published: 03 July 2024

Genetic gear switches drive cancer immune evasion

Nature Genetics ( 2024 ) Cite this article

411 Accesses

1 Altmetric

Metrics details

• Colon cancer

Relentless accumulation of somatic mutations renders mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient cancers immunogenic. The evolutionary strategies that these hypermutator tumors use to drive immune evasion remain unknown. We identify repetitive homopolymer sequences in MMR genes as genetic ON/OFF switches, which vary mutation rate and bias during tumor evolution to fuel intratumor heterogeneity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

24,99 € / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

195,33 € per year

only 16,28 € per issue

Buy this article

• Purchase on Springer Link
• Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Germano, G., Amirouchene-Angelozzi, N., Rospo, G. & Bardelli, A. The clinical impact of the genomic landscape of mismatch repair-deficient cancers. Cancer Discov 8 , 1518–1528 (2018). This review article discusses the clonal evolution of hypermutator cancers in a clinical context.

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Rosenberg, S. M., Longerich, S., Gee, P. & Harris, R. S. Adaptive mutation by deletions in small mononucleotide repeats. Science 265 , 405–407 (1994). This seminal paper revealed evidence for adaptive homopolymer frameshift switching in bacteria.

Zou, X. et al. A systematic CRISPR screen defines mutational mechanisms underpinning signatures caused by replication errors and endogenous DNA damage. Nat. Cancer 2 , 643–657 (2021). This study used elegant CRISPR-knockout models to define mutation signatures associated with MMR loss.

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Fang, H. et al. Deficiency of replication-independent DNA mismatch repair drives a 5-methylcytosine deamination mutational signature in cancer. Sci. Adv. 7 , eabg4398 (2021). This study used bulk sample analyses to deconvolute MMR mutation signatures, and revealed replication-independent functions of MMR in safeguarding genomic integrity.

Sanders, M. A. et al. Life without mismatch repair. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.14.437578 (2021). This preprint studies patients with constitutional MMRd to measure mutation rates associated with loss of MMR in vivo.

Download references

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This is a summary of: Kayhanian, H. et al. Homopolymer switches mediate adaptive mutability in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer. Nat. Genet . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-024-01777-9 (2024).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Genetic gear switches drive cancer immune evasion. Nat Genet (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-024-01778-8

Download citation

Published : 03 July 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-024-01778-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

The history of mutation research

Cite this chapter.

• Charlotte Auerbach F.R.S. 2  

372 Accesses

In this introductory chapter, I want to present a brief review of the history of mutation research. I shall emphasize, not so much individual discoveries and their originators, as the problems that have instigated and dominated research in successive periods. This will set the stage for the rest of the book. We shall follow the shifting pattern of problems and of means to attack them from the earliest beginning of mutation research to the present day. We shall see that a few problems have been solved; that others have remained with us, although often in modified guise; that new problems keep on arising from new findings. Without this last feature, mutation research would no longer be a living branch of science. We shall see that, judged by its unsolved and challenging problems, it is still very much alive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Unable to display preview.  Download preview PDF.

Avery, O.T., MacLeod, C.M. and McCarty, M. (1944), ‘Studies on the chemical nature of the substance inducing transformation of pneumococcal types’, J. Exp. Med. 79 , 137–158.

Article   PubMed   CAS   Google Scholar  

Hershey, A.D. and Chase, M. (1952) ‘Independent functions of viral protein and nucleic acid in growth of bacteriophage’, J. Gen. Physiol. 36 , 39–56.

Wilkins, M.H.F., Stokes, A.R. and Wilson, H.R.,(1953), ‘Molecular structure of desoxypentose nucleic acids’, Nature , 171 , 738–740.

Franklin, R.F. and Gosling R.G. (1953), ‘Molecular configuration in sodium thymonucleate’, Nature , 171 , 740–741.

Watson, J.D. and Crick, F.H.C., (1953), ‘The structure of DNA’, Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant Biol. 18 , 123–131.

de Vries, H. (1909), The Mutation Theory. Experiments and Observations on the Origin of Species in the Vegetable Kingdom . Open Court Publ. Co., Chicago.

Google Scholar  

Bateson, W. (1928), ‘A suggestion as to the nature of the “Walnut” comb in fowls’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society XIII, 1905, In Scientific Papers of William Bateson , II , 135–138.

Muller, H.J. (1922), ‘Variation Due to Change in the Individual Gene’, Am. Nat. 56 , 32–50.

Article   Google Scholar  

Muller, H.J. (1928), ‘The measurement of gene mutation rate in Drosophila , its high variability and its dependence upon temperature’, Genetics 13 , 279–357.

PubMed   CAS   Google Scholar  

Timoféeff-Ressovsky, N. W. (1934), ‘The experimental production of mutations’, Biol. Rev. 9 , 411–457.

Timoféeff-Ressovsky, N.W. (1939), ‘Le mécanisme des mutations et la structure du gène.’, Actualités scientifiques et industrielles 812 .

Goldschmidt, R. (1946), ‘Position Effect and the theory of the Corpuscular Gene.’, Experientia 2 , 250–256.

Stadler, L.J. (1954), ‘The Gene’, Science 120 , 811–819.

Revell, S.H. (1959), ‘The accurate estimation of chromatid breakage, and its relevance to a new interpretation of chromatid aberrations induced by ionizing radiations’, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 150 , 563–589.

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Muller, H.J. and Mott-Smith, L.M. (1930), ‘Evidence that natural radioactivity is inadequate to explain the frequency of “natural” mutations’, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 16 , 277–285.

Sparrow, A.H. (1950), Tolerance of Tradescantia to continuous exposures to gamma radiation from cobalt 60, Genetics 35 , 135.

Auerbach, C. (1949), ‘Chemical Mutagenesis’ Biol. Rev. 24 , 355–391.

Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology (11) (1946), ‘Heredity and Variation in Micro-organisms’, The Biological Laboratory , New York .

Novick, A. and Szilard, L.(1950), ‘Description of the Chemostat’, Science 112 , 715–716.

‘Genes and chromosomes, structure and organization’, (1941), Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 9 .

‘Genes and Mutations’ (1951), Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 16

Henning, U. and Yanofsky C. (1962), ‘Amino acid replacements associated with reversion and recombination within the A gene’, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 18 , 1497–1504.

Rechler, M.M. and Martin R.G. (1970), ‘The intercistronic divide: Translation of an intercistronic region in the histidine operon of Salmonella typhimurium ’, Nature 226 , 908–911.

Miller, O.L. Jr. and Hamkalo, B.A. (1972), ‘Visualization of RNA synthesis on chromosomes’, Int. Rev. Cytol. 33 , 1–25.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Institute of Animal Genetics, University of Edinburgh, UK

Charlotte Auerbach F.R.S. ( Professor Emeritus )

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 Charlotte Auerbach

About this chapter

Auerbach, C. (1976). The history of mutation research. In: Mutation research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3103-0_1

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3103-0_1

Publisher Name : Springer, Boston, MA

Print ISBN : 978-0-412-11280-5

Online ISBN : 978-1-4899-3103-0

eBook Packages : Springer Book Archive

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Iran J Pediatr
• v.23(4); 2013 Aug

An Overview of Mutation Detection Methods in Genetic Disorders

Nejat mahdieh.

1 Medical Genetic Group, Faculty of Medicine, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran

Bahareh Rabbani

2 Medical Genetic Group, Faculty of Medicine, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran

3 Growth and Development Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Genetic disorders are traditionally categorized into three main groups: single-gene, chromosomal, and multifactorial disorders. Single gene or Mendelian disorders result from errors in DNA sequence of a gene and include autosomal dominant (AD), autosomal recessive (AR), X-linked recessive (XR), X-linked dominant and Y-linked (holandric) disorders. Chromosomal disorders are due to chromosomal aberrations including numerical and structural damages. Molecular and cytogenetic techniques have been applied to identify genetic mutations leading to diseases. Accurate diagnosis of diseases is essential for appropriate treatment of patients, genetic counseling and prevention strategies. Characteristic features of patterns of inheritance are briefly reviewed and a short description of chromosomal disorders is also presented. In addition, applications of cytogenetic and molecular techniques and different types of mutations are discussed for genetic diagnosis of the pediatric genetic diseases. The purpose is to make pediatricians familiar with the applications of cytogenetic and molecular techniques and tools used for genetic diagnosis.

Introduction

The diploid human genome including twenty-three pairs of chromosomes is composed of 20–25 thousand genes; haploid set is estimated to be 3.2*10 9 base pairs [ 1 ] . One member of each chromosome is received from the father, and the other member of the pair is transmitted through maternal lineage. DNA is made up of four base pairs adenine, thymine, cytosine and guanine abbreviated as A, T, C, and G, respectively. Genes consisting of DNA base pairs are located on chromosomes. A gene is a sequence of base pairs that produces a functional product including a RNA molecule or subsequently a peptide ( Fig. 1A ). An allele is positioned on a locus, the specific location of a gene or DNA sequence on a chromosome; so the diploid genome contains two alleles of each gene. Chromosomes 1 to 22 are called autosomes and the twenty-third pair is the sex chromosomes, i.e. X and Y [ 2 ] .

A) Nucleus, chromosomes, gene, exon, intron and base pairs. B) Central dogma. C1) Common symbols for drawing a pedigree. C2) Autosomal recessive mode of inheritance; C3) X-linked recessive inheritance; C4) Autosomal dominant inheritance

Steps in the transmission of genetic information include replication (DNA makes DNA), transcription (DNA makes RNA), RNA processing (capping, splicing, tailing and RNA translocation to cytoplasm), translation (RNA makes protein), and protein processing, folding, transport and incorporation ( Fig. 1B ). If the DNA sequence is mutated and the alteration is not repaired by the cell, subsequent replications reproduce the mutation. A variety of mechanisms can cause mutations ranging from a single nucleotide alteration to the loss, duplication or rearrangement of chromosomes [ 2 ] . Genetic diseases are usually categorized into three major classes: single-gene, chromosomal, and multi-factorial disorders. A combination of genes and environmental factors is involved in multifactorial disorders such as congenital heart disease, most types of cleft lip/palate, club foot, and neural tube defects [ 3 ] .

Here, Mendelian patterns of inheritance and chromosomal disorders are reviewed and a brief summary of genetic methods in genetic disorders is presented to make the pediatricians familiar with the basics of the cytogenetics and molecular methods of mutation detection as well.

Mendelian Disorders

Gregor Mendel discovered a set of principles of heredity in the mid-19th century; characteristic patterns of inheritance are determined on the basis of these principles. Single gene disorders arising from errors in DNA sequence of a gene are categorized into autosomal dominant (AD), autosomal recessive (AR), X-linked recessive (XR), X-linked dominant and Y-linked (holandric) disorders [ 3 ] .

In autosomal dominant disorders ( Fig. 1C1 and ​ and4), 4 ), damage in one allele of a pair of the gene leads to the deficiency ( Table 1 ) [ 3 ] , e.g. a mutation in FGFR3 gene can cause achondroplasia [ 4 , 5 ] . A parent with an autosomal dominant disorder has a 50% chance of transmitting the disease to her/his child [ 2 ] . The range of signs and symptoms of some diseases in different people vary widely (variable expressivity), e.g. some people with Marfan syndrome (due to mutation in FBN1) have only mild symptoms (such as being tall and thin with long, slender fingers), while others have life-threatening complications involving the heart and blood vessels as well [ 6 ] . Furthermore, some individuals exhibit signs and symptoms of a given disorder while others do not, even though they have the disease-causing mutation (i.e. a proportion of people with a particular mutation show the condition in this type of disorders), e.g. many people having mutation of the BRCA1 gene will develop breast cancer during their lifetime, while some people will not [ 2 , 7 ] . In other words, in a pedigree a healthy individual has at least one affected parent and one affected child (skipped generation) [ 2 ] .

Modes of inheritance and their properties

A) Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). B) Single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP). C) Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). D) Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). E) Microarray.

Mutations in both alleles (loss of function) of a gene are required to cause the defect to appear in an autosomal recessive disorder ( Table 1 and Fig. 1C2 ), i.e. an affected person has got one abnormal allele from one heterozygous parent. In this type of disorders, there is a 25% chance of having an affected offspring for heterozygous parents. In case of common autosomal recessive disorders or traits (sickle cell anemia due to a specific mutation in HBB gene encoding beta globin [ 8 ] or nonsyndromic autosomal recessive hearing loss due to mutations in GJB2 gene encoding connexin 26 [ 9 – 14 ] ), sometimes a homozygous affected person marries a heterozygous carrier; such an example, in which apparently dominant transmission of this disorder occurs, is called pseudodominant inheritance [ 2 ] .

In an X-linked disorder ( Fig. 1C3 and Table 1 ), the mutated gene is located on the X chromosome. A recessive mutation can lead to the disease. The gene in chromosome X should be mutated to cause the condition; hence, an X-linked recessive disorder is carried by females, while usally affects males.

Some of genetic conditions follow none of the mentioned patterns of inheritance; mitochondrial diseases, trinucleotide expansion disorders and genomic imprinting defects have non-Mendelian or nontraditional pattern of inheritance [ 2 , 15 ] .

Chromosomal Disorders

Typically, somatic cells proliferate via division called mitosis while germ cells are produced through meiosis division. Meiosis involves a reductional division followed by an equational division, Meiosis I and II, respectively.

Oogenesis begins in the female fetus at 12 weeks, but it is stopped in a stage of meiosis I (when the homologous chromosomes have replicated and paired as bivalents or tetrads) at about 20 weeks [ 16 ] . At puberty usually only one oocyte is released per month; a primary oocyte completes meiosis I and produces one secondary oocyte and one polar body. Chromosomal aberrations including numerical (due to errors at chromosome pairing and crossing-over) and structural damages lead to chromosomal disorders ( Table 2 , ​ ,3 3 and ​ and4; 4 ; Fig. 2A and ​ andB). B ). Aneuploidy is usually due to failure of segregation of chromosomes in meiosis I or meiosis II (non-disjunction, premature disjunction or anaphase lag) [ 17 ] ; examples of numerical aberrations include Down syndrome (trisomy 21), Edwards syndrome (trisomy 18), Patau syndrome (trisomy 13), Klinefelter syndrome (XXY syndrome), Turner syndrome (monosomy X) and trisomy X. Chromosomal errors in oocytes are increased dramatically with maternal age. Non-disjunction or chromosome lag during mitosis can lead to mosaicism [ 2 ] .

A) Chromosome segregation during meiosis, nondisjunction and its consequences. Nondisjunction (NDJ) at meiosis I and II leads to uniparental heterodisomy and uniparental isodisomy, respectively. B) Structural aberrations of human chromosomes. C) Human karyotype. Chromosomes in a typical male. D) Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

Examples of numerical aberrations (aneuploidies)

Syn: syndrome

Chromosomal aberrations in human disorders

Syn: Syndrome; Ref: Reference; T: Translocation; Inv: Inversion; psu dic: Psuedodicentric; rcp: Reciprocal; rob: Robertsonian; upd: Uniparental Disomy

Gene-based Mutations in human disorders

Syn: Syndrome; Ref: Reference

Most of structural aberrations, including translocations, deletions, inversions, duplications, ring chromosomes and isochromosomes ( Table 3 , ​ ,4 4 and Fig. 2B ) result from unequal exchange between chromosomes or enzymatic misrepairing of two chromosome breakages; examples of structural aberration are cat cry syndrome (5p-), Williams syndrome (7q11.2 deletion), DiGeorge syndrome (22q11.2 deletion), etc.

Types of Mutations

A mutation is a change in the nucleotide sequence in coding portions of the DNA which may alter the amino acid sequences of proteins, or a change in noncoding regions of DNA which has the potential for changing expression of the gene, for example by altering the strength of a promoter. There are many mutations which are classified to chromosomal and DNA-based mutations ( Table 3 and ​ and4). 4 ). Mutations can also be categorized on the basis of the function: 1) The loss-of-function mutations cause a decrease or a loss of the gene product or the activity of the gene product; 2) The gain-of-function mutations cause an increase in the amount of gene product or its activity, and sometimes create a new property, leading to a toxic product responsible for a pathological effect.

Three types of mutations usually observed in dominant disorders are gain-of-function, haploinsuficiency and dominant negative. Mutations may act as dominant or recessive when the amount of product from one allele is not sufficient for a complete function (Haplo- insufficiency), e.g. mutations in LDLR leading to haploinsufficiency in familial hypercholesterolemia [ 18 ] . If the product of the defective allele interferes with the product of normal allele (Dominant negative) it affects the function of normal protein; basically collagen mutations are dominant negative ones [ 19 ] . A mutated allele may gain a new or excessive activity (Gain of function) e.g. mutations of FGFR3 in achondroplasia [ 4 , 5 ] .

Mutation Detection

With the development of new technologies for more accurate understanding of the genome and potential gene therapies, the detection of mutations has an increasingly central role in various areas of genetic diagnosis including preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), prenatal diagnosis (PND), presymptomatic testing, confirmational diagnosis and forensic/identity testing. Two groups of tests, molecular and cytogenetic, are used in genetic syndromes. In general, single base pair mutations are identified by direct sequencing, DNA hybridization and/or restriction enzyme digestion methods. However, there are two approaches for genetic diagnosis; indirect approach depends on the results from a genetic linkage analysis using DNA markers such as STR(short tandem repeat) or VNTR (variable number tandem repeat) markers flanking or within the gene [ 20 – 22 ] . The direct approach for diagnosis essentially depends on the detection of the genetic variations responsible for the disease.

Cytogenetics and Molecular Cytogenetics

Conventional Karyotyping : Chromosome studies are advised in the following situations: suspected chromosome abnormality, sexual disorders, multiple congenital anomalies and/or developmental retardation, undiagnosed learning disabilities, infertility or multiple miscarriage, stillbirth and malignancies [ 2 ] . Traditionally, the microscopic study of chromosomes is performed on compacted chromosomes at a magnification of about 1000 at metaphase.

Preparation of a visual karyotype ( Fig 2C ) is done by arresting dividing cells at metaphase stage with a microtubule polymerization inhibitor such as colchicine; the cells, then, are spread on a glass slide and stained with Giemsa stain (G-banding). Chromosomes are studied by making a photograph or digital imaging and subsequent assembling of chromosomes. Human chromos-omes are categorized based on position of centromere; in metacentric chromosomes, centromere is located in the middle (chromosomes 1, 3, 16, 19 and 20), chromosomes 13, 14, 15, 21, 22 and Y are acrocentric (the centromere near one end), and other chromosomes are sub-metacentric. Chromosome arms are defined by region number (from centromere), band, sub-band and sub-sub-band numbers, e.g. 12q13.12 refers to chromosome 12, long arm, region 1, band 3, sub-band 1, sub-sub-band 2 (read chromosome 12, q, 1, 3, point, 1, 2). High resolution banding needs fixation before the chromosomes are fully compacted. The convenient methods of chromosome banding are G-(Giemsa), R-(reverse), C-(centromere) and Q-(quinacrine) banding.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) : FISH is applied to provide specific localization of genes on chromosomes. Rapid diagnosis of trisomies and microdeletions is acquired using specific probes. Usually a denatured probe is added to a metaphase chromosome spread and incubated overnight to allow sequence-specific hybridization. After washing off the unbound probe, the bound probe is visualized by its fluorescence under UV light; thus, the site of the gene of interest is observed as in situ ( Fig 2D ) [ 2 , 23 ] . This technique is used to check the cause of trisomies, microdeletion syndromes, etc.

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) : CGH, a special FISH technique (dual probes), is applied for detecting all genomic imbalances. The basics of technique is comparison of total genomic DNA of the given sample DNA (e.g. tumor DNA) with total genomic DNA of normal cells. Typically, an identical amount of both tumor and normal DNAs is labeled with two different fluorescent dyes; the mixture is added and hybridized to a normal lymphocyte metaphase slide. A fluorescent microscope equipped with a CCD camera and an image analysis system are used for evaluation [ 24 ] . Technical details have been described in numerous CGH publications [ 25 , 26 ] . Copy number of genetic material (gains and losses) is calculated by evaluation software [ 27 ] . CGH is used to determine copy number alterations of genome in cancer and those cells whose karyotype is hard or impossible to prepare or analyze. In array-CGH, metaphase slide is replaced by specific DNA sequences, spotted in arrays on glass slides [ 28 ] ; so its resolution is increased.

Molecular Diagnostics

In addition to genetic causes of disorders, predisposition to a disease or treatment options could be revealed by determining DNA variations. Molecular diagnostics provide a way for assessment of the genetic makeup of human; it combines laboratory medicine with molecular genetics to develop DNA/RNA-based analytical methods for monitoring human pathologies. A wide range of methods has been used for mutation detection. Molecular methods for identification of the disease-causing mutations could be classified as methods for known and methods for unknown mutations. Several criteria, however, have to be met for choosing a suitable method; for example the following points should be considered: type of nucleic acid (DNA or RNA), kind of specimen (e.g., blood, tissues, etc.), the number of mutations, and reliability of the method. The pediatricians need to be noticed when prescribing these tests to provide an accurate diagnosis for the patients.

A) Known Mutations

Many different approaches have been used for identifying known mutations. Usually starting with the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), additional assay steps are performed based on the type of mutation. Table 5 shows examples of some of the frequently used techniques as well as their advantages and disadvantages. Here, a brief view of some of these techniques is presented with focus on their applications .

Cytogenetics and molecular methods for mutation detection

FISH: Fluorescence in situ hybridization; CGH: Comparative genomic hybridization; RELP: Restriction fragment length polymorphism; ARMS; Amplification refractory mutation system; PCR: Polymerase chain reaction; RT: Reverse transcriptase; MLPA; Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification; DGGE: Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis; SSCP: Single Strand Conformational Polymorphism; CCM: Chemical cleavage of mismatch; PTT: Protein truncation test; OLA: Oligonucleotide ligation assay

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and its versions: In 1980s, Dr Mullis introduced a method for amplifying DNA fragment to a large number of fragments in only a few hours; this method, named polymerase chain reaction (PCR), was a critical point in molecular biology [ 29 , 30 ] . Essential components of polymerase chain reaction are template DNA, primers (a pair of synthetic oligonucleotides complementary to the two strands of target DNA), thermostable DNA polymerase enzyme (e.g. Taq), divalent cations (usually Mg 2+ ), deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs) and buffer solution. PCR, consisting of 25-40 repeated cycles, has three discrete steps of temperature changes ( Fig. 3A ); after a single temperature step at a high temperature (>90°C), a series of cycles of denaturation, annealing of primers and extension are performed and followed by a single temperature step called final product extension or brief storage. These steps are as follow:

A) Polymerase chain reaction. B) DNA sequencing

Initial denaturation step includes heating the reaction to a temperature of 92–96°C for 1–9 minutes.

• Denaturation step includes heating the reaction to 92–98°C for 20–30 seconds. The hydrogen bonds between complementary bases are disrupted and DNA molecules are denatured, yielding single-stranded DNA molecules (DNA melting).
• Annealing step is performed by decreasing temperature to 50–65°C for 25–40 seconds; so the primers are annealed to their targets on single stranded DNAs by hydrogen bonds and a polymerase can bind to the primer-template hybrid and begin DNA polymerization in next step.
• Extension step includes polymerization of the bases to the primers; a thermostable such as Taq polymerase extends a new strand complementary to the DNA template strand by adding matched dNTPs in 5’ to 3’ direction at a temperature of 72°C. A series of 25-40 repeated cycles of denaturation, annealing of primers and extension is performed to amplify the template fragment ( Fig. 3A ). Subsequently, a final elongation is sometimes done at 70–74°C for 5–15 minutes after the last PCR cycle to ensure full extension of any remaining single-stranded DNA [ 2 ] .

Checking the PCR products, electrophoresis (agarose or polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) is employed for sizing the PCR products by comparison with a DNA ladder (a molecular weight marker). Here, applications of some PCR versions are mentioned.

• Reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR): In this version, a strand of RNA molecule is transcribed reversely into its complementary DNA (cDNA) using the reverse transcriptase enzyme. This cDNA is then amplified by PCR. RT-PCR is applied to study the mutations at RNA level.
• Multiplex PCR: In this technique, multiple selected target regions in a sample are amplified simultaneously using different pairs of primers.
• Nested PCR: It includes two successive PCRs; the product of the first PCR reaction is used as a template for the second PCR. This type of PCR is employed to amplify templates in low copy numbers in specimens. It has the benefits of increased sensitivity and specificity.
• Amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) PCR: Allele-specific amplification (AS-PCR) or ARMS-PCR is a general technique for the detection of any point mutation or small deletion [ 31 ] . The genotype (normal, heterozygous and homozygous states) of a sample could be determined using two complementary reactions: one containing a specific primer for the amplification of normal DNA sequence at a given locus and the other one containing a mutantspecific primer for amplification of mutant DNA. ARMS-PCR has been used to check the most common mutation in GJB2 gene, 35delG mutation among deaf children.
• Real time PCR: In this technique, the amplified DNA is detected as the PCR progresses. It is commonly used in gene expression studies and quantification of initial copy number of the target [ 2 ] .

DNA microarray: DNA “chips” or microarrays have been used as a possible testing for multiple mutations. In this technology, single DNA strands including sequences of different targets are fixed to a solid support in an array format. On the other hand, the sample DNA or cDNA labeled with fluorescent dyes is hybridized to the chip ( Fig. 4E ) [ 32 ] . Then using a laser system, the presence of fluorescence is checked; the sequences and their quantities in the sample are determined.

DNA Sequencing: As a powerful technique in molecular genetics, DNA sequencing provides analysis of genes at the nucleotide level. The main aim of DNA sequencing is to determine the sequence of small regions of interest (∼1 kilobase) using a PCR product as a template. Dideoxynucleotide sequencing or Sanger sequencing represents the most widely used technique for sequencing DNA [ 33 ] . In this method, double stranded DNA is denatured into single stranded DNA with NaOH. A Sanger reaction consists of a single strand DNA, primer, a mixture of a particular ddNTP with normal dNTPs (e.g. ddATP with dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP). A fluorescent dye molecule is covalently attached to the dideoxynucleotide. ddNTPs cannot form a phosphodiester bond with the next deoxynucleotide so that they terminate DNA chain elongation. This step is done in four separate reactions using a different ddNTP for each reaction ( Fig. 3B ) [ 2 ] . DNA sequencing could be used to check all small known and unknown DNA variations.

Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA): MLPA is commonly applied to screen deletions and duplications of up to 50 different genomic DNA or RNA sequences. Altogether gene deletions and duplications account up to 10%, and in many disorders up to 30% of disease-causing mutations [ 34 , 35 ] . In this technique, briefly, the probe set is hybridized to genomic DNA in solution. Each probe consists of two halves; one half is composed of a target specific sequence and a universal primer sequence, and other half has other more sequences, a variable length random fragment to provide the size differences for electrophoretic resolution. A pair of probes is hybridized on the target region adjacently so that they can then be joined by use of a ligase; the contiguous probe can be amplified by PCR [ 36 ] . After PCR amplification, the copy number of target sequence i.e. deletion or duplication of target sequence can be determined and quantified using the relative peak heights ( Fig. 4A ).

B) Unknown Mutations

Single Strand Conformational Polymorphism (SSCP): SSCP is one of the simplest screening techniques for detecting unknown mutations (microlesions) such as unknown single-base substitutions, small deletions, small insertions, or microinversions. A DNA variation causes alterations in the conformation of denatured DNA fragments during migration within gel electrophoresis. The logic is comparison of the altered migration of denatured wild-type and mutant fragments during gel electrophoresis [ 37 ] . In this technique, briefly, DNA fragments are denatured, and renatured under special conditions preventing the formation of double-stranded DNA and allowing conformational structures to form in single-stranded fragments ( Fig. 4B ). The conformation is unique and resulted from the primary nucleotide sequence. Mobility of these fragments is differed through nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels; detection of variations is based on these conformational structures. PCR is used to amplify the fragments, called PCR-SSCP, because the optimal fragment size can be 150 to 200 bp. About 80–90% of potential point mutations are detected by SSCP [ 37 , 38 ] .

Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE): DGGE has been used for screening of unknown point mutations. It is based on differences in the melting behavior of small DNA fragments (200-700 bp); even a single base substitution can cause such a difference. In this technique, DNA is first extracted and subjected to denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. As the denaturing condition increases, the fragment completely melts to single strands. The rate of mobility in acrylamide gels depends on the physical shape of the fragment ( Fig. 4C ). Detection of mutated fragments would be possible by comparing the melting behavior of DNA fragments on denaturing gradient gels. Approximately less than 100% of point mutations can be detected using DGGE. Maximum of a nearly 1000 bp fragment can be investigated by this technique [ 39 ] .

Heteroduplex analysis: A mixture of wild-type and mutant DNA molecules is denatured and renatured to produce heteroduplices. Homoduplices and heteroduplices show different electrophoretic mobilities through nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels. In this technique, fragment size ranges between 200 and 600 bp. Nearly 80% of point mutations have been estimated to be detected by heteroduplex analysis [ 40 ] .

Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP): Point mutations can change restriction sites in DNA causing alteration in cleavage by restriction endonucleases which produce fragments with various sizes ( Fig. 4D ). RFLP is used to detect mutations occurring in restriction sites [ 41 ] .

Next Generation Sequencing

In recent years, newer technologies for DNA sequencing in a massive scale have been emerged that are referred to as next-generation sequencing (NGS). High speed and throughput, both qualitative and quantitative sequence data are allowed by means of NGS technologies so that genome sequencing projects can be completed in a few days [ 42 , 43 ] . NGS systems provide several sequencing approaches including whole-genome sequencing (WGS), whole exome sequencing (WES), transcriptome sequencing, methylome, etc. The coding sequences compromises about 1% (30Mb) of the genome. More than 95% of the exons are covered by WES; on the other hand, 85% of disease-causing mutations in Mendelian disorders are located in coding regions. Sequencing of the complete coding regions (exome) [ 44 ] , therefore, could potentially uncover the mutations causing rare, mostly monogenic, genetic disorders as well as predisposing variants in common diseases and cancer.

Any change in DNA sequence could be pathogenic if it has abnormal effect on biologic pathways within the cell. Characterization of the genetic basis of the disease is required for an accurate diagnosis. PCR as a powerful and sensitive technique can amplify very small amounts of DNA. This technique has many applications in various areas of biology and it has been used for diagnosis of inherited diseases on the DNA level. Examining DNA would demonstrate the changes in the genes that may cause disease. Molecular diagnosis of genetic disorders is noticed as the detection of the pathogenic mutations in DNA and/or RNA samples. It could facilitate fine subclassification, prognosis, and therapy of disorders. Since most hereditary disorders affect people at childhood ages, it is important for pediatricians to be familiar with genetic testing methodology as well as applications of these tests in clinic to get an accurate diagnosis. The clinicians should be able to recognize and categorize genetic disorders and affected patients on the basis of symptoms and signs to a subtype of chromosomal or single gene disorders, so that they could offer an appropriate genetic test for diagnosing the disease. They could also discuss and consult with a medical geneticist.

Acknowledgment

We would like to appreciate Dr Gh-R Walizadeh for critical reading of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

Help | Advanced Search

Computer Science > Computation and Language

Title: scaling synthetic data creation with 1,000,000,000 personas.

Abstract: We propose a novel persona-driven data synthesis methodology that leverages various perspectives within a large language model (LLM) to create diverse synthetic data. To fully exploit this methodology at scale, we introduce Persona Hub -- a collection of 1 billion diverse personas automatically curated from web data. These 1 billion personas (~13% of the world's total population), acting as distributed carriers of world knowledge, can tap into almost every perspective encapsulated within the LLM, thereby facilitating the creation of diverse synthetic data at scale for various scenarios. By showcasing Persona Hub's use cases in synthesizing high-quality mathematical and logical reasoning problems, instructions (i.e., user prompts), knowledge-rich texts, game NPCs and tools (functions) at scale, we demonstrate persona-driven data synthesis is versatile, scalable, flexible, and easy to use, potentially driving a paradigm shift in synthetic data creation and applications in practice, which may have a profound impact on LLM research and development.

Submission history

Access paper:.

• HTML (experimental)
• Other Formats

References & Citations

• Google Scholar
• Semantic Scholar

BibTeX formatted citation

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Code, data and media associated with this article, recommenders and search tools.

• Institution

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

• DOI: 10.54254/2753-7048/55/20240029
• Corpus ID: 270295954

Research on the Development and Construction of Confucius Institutes in Portugal under the Belt and Road Initiative

• Published in Lecture Notes in Education… 6 June 2024

Related Papers

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers

GENE MUTATIONS, GENETIC DISEASE AND PHARMACOGENETIC GENES DISORDER

• December 2010
• International Journal of Research in Ayurveda and Pharmacy 1(2)
• CC BY-NC 4.0
• This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.

Discover the world's research

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations

• James V. Neel
• John R. Strahler

• C. Paisan-Ruiz

• AB Singleton
• Michael J. McPhaul
• Marco Marcelli

• Karine Leon

• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up