how to conduct a systematic review a narrative literature review

Our goal with this paper is to conduct a narrative review of the literature about systematic reviews and outline the essential elements of a systematic review along with the limitations of such a review. Keywords: meta-analysis; narrative literature review; prisma checklist; systematic reviews.

Background. A systematic review, as its name suggests, is a systematic way of collecting, evaluating, integrating, and presenting findings from several studies on a specific question or topic.[] A systematic review is a research that, by identifying and combining evidence, is tailored to and answers the research question, based on an assessment of all relevant studies.[2,3] To identify assess ...

The process of writing up a review can be distilled to a sequence of five simple steps. The first four steps are similar but different for a narrative review compared with a systematic review, reflecting the key differences between these review types (Box 1) [10]. The fifth step is common to both types of review.

The best reviews synthesize studies to draw broad theoretical conclusions about what a literature means, linking theory to evidence and evidence to theory. This guide describes how to plan, conduct, organize, and present a systematic review of quantitative (meta-analysis) or qualitative (narrative review, meta-synthesis) information.

Our goal with this paper is to conduct a narrative review of the literature about systematic reviews and outline the essential elements of a systematic review along with the limitations of such a review. Categories: Medical Education, Miscellaneous, Other Keywords: systematic reviews, meta-analysis, narrative literature review, prisma checklist

Abstract. Systematic reviews are ranked very high in research and are considered the most valid form of medical evidence. They provide a complete summary of the current literature relevant to a ...

Introduction. Narrative reviews are a type of knowledge synthesis grounded in a distinct research tradition. They are often framed as non-systematic, which implies that there is a hierarchy of evidence placing narrative reviews below other review forms. 1 However, narrative reviews are highly useful to medical educators and researchers. While a systematic review often focuses on a narrow ...

A systematic review provides an unbiased assessment of these studies [4]. Such reviews emerged in the 1970s in the field of social sciences. Systematic reviews, as well as the meta-analyses of the appropriate studies, can be the best form of evidence available to clinicians [3]. The unsystematic narrative review is more likely to include only ...

Another reason for conducting a systematic review may be the most emotionally . ... M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews. Review . of General Psychology, 3, 311-320.

Literature reviews establish the foundation of academic inquires. However, in the planning field, we lack rigorous systematic reviews. In this article, through a systematic search on the methodology of literature review, we categorize a typology of literature reviews, discuss steps in conducting a systematic literature review, and provide suggestions on how to enhance rigor in literature ...

Writing a narrative literature review requires careful planning. This chapter summarizes some key steps in reviewing the literature. First, a team needs to be formed. Second, a topic needs to be chosen. This needs to be relevant to the author's research/teaching interests and a well-defined issue.

The meticulous nature of the systematic review research methodology differentiates a systematic review from a narrative review (literature review or authoritative review). This paper provides a brief step by step summary of how to conduct a systematic review, which may be of interest for clinicians and researchers.

The main objective of a systematic review is to formulate a well-defined research question and use qualitative and quantitative methods to analyze all the available evidence attempting to answer the question. In contrast, narrative reviews can address one or more questions with a much broader scope.

Our goal with this paper is to conduct a narrative review of the literature about systematic reviews and outline the essential elements of a systematic review along with the limitations of such a review. Keywords: systematic reviews, meta-analysis, narrative literature review, prisma checklist. A literature review provides an important insight ...

Guidelines for writing a systematic review. 1. Introduction. A key feature of any academic activity is to have a sufficient understanding of the subject area under investigation and thus an awareness of previous research. Undertaking a literature review with an analysis of the results on a specific issue is required to demonstrate sufficient ...

A narrative literature review is NOT: Just a summary of sources; A review of everything written on a particular topic; A research paper arguing for a specific viewpoint - a lit review should avoid bias and highlight areas of disagreements; A systematic review; Purposes of a narrative literature review: Explain the background of research on a topic

The purpose of this article is to understand the important steps involved in conducting a systematic review of all kinds of clinical studies. We conducted a narrative review of the literature about systematic reviews with a special focus on articles that discuss conducting reviews of randomized controlled trials.

Abstract. Performing a literature review is a critical first step in research to understanding the state-of-the-art and identifying gaps and challenges in the field. A systematic literature review is a method which sets out a series of steps to methodically organize the review. In this paper, we present a guide designed for researchers and in ...

A narrative review of the literature about systematic reviews is conducted and the essential elements of a systematic review along with the limitations of such a review are outlined. Systematic reviews are ranked very high in research and are considered the most valid form of medical evidence. They provide a complete summary of the current literature relevant to a research question and can be ...

Method details Overview. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is a research methodology to collect, identify, and critically analyze the available research studies (e.g., articles, conference proceedings, books, dissertations) through a systematic procedure [12].An SLR updates the reader with current literature about a subject [6].The goal is to review critical points of current knowledge on a ...

The labels Narrative Review and Literature Review are often describing the same type of review. For scientific purposes, the term Literature Review is the one used most often. ... The difference between a Systematic Review and a Narrative Review can be summarized as follows: Good Quality Systematic Reviews: Traditional Narrative Reviews:

Literature Review Definitions. Below are definitions from: Booth, A. Papaioannou, D., and Sutton, A. (2016) Systematic approaches to a successful literature review.London: SAGE Publications, Ltd. Mapping Review: "A rapid search of the literature aiming to give a broad overview of the characteristics of a topic area. Mapping of existing research, identification of gaps, and a summary assessment ...

3. Select the databases you will use to conduct your searches. By Subject; By Research Guide ; 4. Conduct your searches and find the literature. Review the abstracts carefully - this will save you time! Many databases will have a search history tab for you to return to for later. Use bibliographies and references of research studies to locate ...

The extensive and comprehensive systematic review and meta analysis of Shool et al (Citation 2024) complements the work of Liu et al. (Citation 2008), the only systematic review on motorcycle helmet use and injury outcomes in the Cochrane database. Shool and collaborators aimed to identify the underlying causes of the variation in helmet usage ...

Systematic reviews, according to Wright, et al., are defined as a "review of the evidence on a clearly formulated question that uses systematic and explicit methods to identify, select and critically appraise relevant primary research, and to extract and analyze data from the studies that are included in the review" [3].

The recent report of the Lancet Commission on the Value of Death [] reveals the uneasy relationship between the twenty-first century society, particularly in affluent countries, with death and dying, i.e. the process surrounding the death of a person, including the idea of our own death.The authors of the report emphasize that there is still much to be done to reverse people's often negative ...

Study design. A mixed methods systematic review (MMSR) and narrative synthesis were conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidance for conducting MMSR [24, 25].The JBI guidance for conducting the MMSR approach is based on the typology of systematic reviews developed by Hong. et al.2017 [] which is also described by Harden A. et al.2005 [].

a single estimate" [7-8]. While the systematic review has several advantages, it has several limitations which can affect the conclusion. Inadequate literature searches and heterogeneous studies can lead to false conclusions. Similarly, the quality of assessment is an important step in systematic reviews, and it can lead to adverse consequences if not done properly.

This systematic review aimed to identify common medication errors in Saudi hospitals, their contributing factors, and effective prevention strategies. Materials and Methods: Following PRISMA-P guidelines, a comprehensive review of the literature published after 2019 was conducted. Inclusion criteria focused on peer-reviewed articles in English ...

Background: Telemonitoring systems in cardiology have shown potential in improving chronic cardiovascular disease (CVD) management. This study aims to evaluate the impact of telemonitoring, mainly through mobile applications, on patient outcomes such as self-care, blood pressure control, quality of life, and hospitalization. Methods: We systematically reviewed studies assessing telemonitoring ...