- Link to facebook
- Link to linkedin
- Link to twitter
- Link to youtube
- Writing Tips
![](http://rss3.fun/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
Can You Use I or We in a Research Paper?
![can you say we in a research paper Can You Use I or We in a Research Paper?](https://proofed.com/wp-content/webp-express/webp-images/uploads/2023/08/11-Graphic-Can-You-Use-I-or-We-in-a-Research-Paper-628x492.png.webp)
4-minute read
- 11th July 2023
Writing in the first person, or using I and we pronouns, has traditionally been frowned upon in academic writing . But despite this long-standing norm, writing in the first person isn’t actually prohibited. In fact, it’s becoming more acceptable – even in research papers.
If you’re wondering whether you can use I (or we ) in your research paper, you should check with your institution first and foremost. Many schools have rules regarding first-person use. If it’s up to you, though, we still recommend some guidelines. Check out our tips below!
When Is It Most Acceptable to Write in the First Person?
Certain sections of your paper are more conducive to writing in the first person. Typically, the first person makes sense in the abstract, introduction, discussion, and conclusion sections. You should still limit your use of I and we , though, or your essay may start to sound like a personal narrative .
Using first-person pronouns is most useful and acceptable in the following circumstances.
When doing so removes the passive voice and adds flow
Sometimes, writers have to bend over backward just to avoid using the first person, often producing clunky sentences and a lot of passive voice constructions. The first person can remedy this. For example:
Both sentences are fine, but the second one flows better and is easier to read.
When doing so differentiates between your research and other literature
When discussing literature from other researchers and authors, you might be comparing it with your own findings or hypotheses . Using the first person can help clarify that you are engaging in such a comparison. For example:
In the first sentence, using “the author” to avoid the first person creates ambiguity. The second sentence prevents misinterpretation.
When doing so allows you to express your interest in the subject
In some instances, you may need to provide background for why you’re researching your topic. This information may include your personal interest in or experience with the subject, both of which are easier to express using first-person pronouns. For example:
Expressing personal experiences and viewpoints isn’t always a good idea in research papers. When it’s appropriate to do so, though, just make sure you don’t overuse the first person.
When to Avoid Writing in the First Person
It’s usually a good idea to stick to the third person in the methods and results sections of your research paper. Additionally, be careful not to use the first person when:
Find this useful?
Subscribe to our newsletter and get writing tips from our editors straight to your inbox.
● It makes your findings seem like personal observations rather than factual results.
● It removes objectivity and implies that the writing may be biased .
● It appears in phrases such as I think or I believe , which can weaken your writing.
Keeping Your Writing Formal and Objective
Using the first person while maintaining a formal tone can be tricky, but keeping a few tips in mind can help you strike a balance. The important thing is to make sure the tone isn’t too conversational.
To achieve this, avoid referring to the readers, such as with the second-person you . Use we and us only when referring to yourself and the other authors/researchers involved in the paper, not the audience.
It’s becoming more acceptable in the academic world to use first-person pronouns such as we and I in research papers. But make sure you check with your instructor or institution first because they may have strict rules regarding this practice.
If you do decide to use the first person, make sure you do so effectively by following the tips we’ve laid out in this guide. And once you’ve written a draft, send us a copy! Our expert proofreaders and editors will be happy to check your grammar, spelling, word choice, references, tone, and more. Submit a 500-word sample today!
Is it ever acceptable to use I or we in a research paper?
In some instances, using first-person pronouns can help you to establish credibility, add clarity, and make the writing easier to read.
How can I avoid using I in my writing?
Writing in the passive voice can help you to avoid using the first person.
Share this article:
Post A New Comment
Got content that needs a quick turnaround? Let us polish your work. Explore our editorial business services.
5-minute read
Free Email Newsletter Template (2024)
Promoting a brand means sharing valuable insights to connect more deeply with your audience, and...
6-minute read
How to Write a Nonprofit Grant Proposal
If you’re seeking funding to support your charitable endeavors as a nonprofit organization, you’ll need...
9-minute read
How to Use Infographics to Boost Your Presentation
Is your content getting noticed? Capturing and maintaining an audience’s attention is a challenge when...
8-minute read
Why Interactive PDFs Are Better for Engagement
Are you looking to enhance engagement and captivate your audience through your professional documents? Interactive...
7-minute read
Seven Key Strategies for Voice Search Optimization
Voice search optimization is rapidly shaping the digital landscape, requiring content professionals to adapt their...
Five Creative Ways to Showcase Your Digital Portfolio
Are you a creative freelancer looking to make a lasting impression on potential clients or...
![can you say we in a research paper Logo Harvard University](https://proofed.com/wp-content/webp-express/webp-images/uploads/2020/11/logo-harvard.png.webp)
Make sure your writing is the best it can be with our expert English proofreading and editing.
- Affiliate Program
![can you say we in a research paper Wordvice](https://pstatic.wordvice.com/wv-us/image/biglogo2.png)
- UNITED STATES
- 台灣 (TAIWAN)
- TÜRKIYE (TURKEY)
- Academic Editing Services
- - Research Paper
- - Journal Manuscript
- - Dissertation
- - College & University Assignments
- Admissions Editing Services
- - Application Essay
- - Personal Statement
- - Recommendation Letter
- - Cover Letter
- - CV/Resume
- Business Editing Services
- - Business Documents
- - Report & Brochure
- - Website & Blog
- Writer Editing Services
- - Script & Screenplay
- Our Editors
- Client Reviews
- Editing & Proofreading Prices
- Wordvice Points
- Partner Discount
- Plagiarism Checker
- APA Citation Generator
- MLA Citation Generator
- Chicago Citation Generator
- Vancouver Citation Generator
- - APA Style
- - MLA Style
- - Chicago Style
- - Vancouver Style
- Writing & Editing Guide
- Academic Resources
- Admissions Resources
Can You Use First-Person Pronouns (I/we) in a Research Paper?
Research writers frequently wonder whether the first person can be used in academic and scientific writing. In truth, for generations, we’ve been discouraged from using “I” and “we” in academic writing simply due to old habits. That’s right—there’s no reason why you can’t use these words! In fact, the academic community used first-person pronouns until the 1920s, when the third person and passive-voice constructions (that is, “boring” writing) were adopted–prominently expressed, for example, in Strunk and White’s classic writing manual “Elements of Style” first published in 1918, that advised writers to place themselves “in the background” and not draw attention to themselves.
In recent decades, however, changing attitudes about the first person in academic writing has led to a paradigm shift, and we have, however, we’ve shifted back to producing active and engaging prose that incorporates the first person.
Can You Use “I” in a Research Paper?
However, “I” and “we” still have some generally accepted pronoun rules writers should follow. For example, the first person is more likely used in the abstract , Introduction section , Discussion section , and Conclusion section of an academic paper while the third person and passive constructions are found in the Methods section and Results section .
In this article, we discuss when you should avoid personal pronouns and when they may enhance your writing.
It’s Okay to Use First-Person Pronouns to:
- clarify meaning by eliminating passive voice constructions;
- establish authority and credibility (e.g., assert ethos, the Aristotelian rhetorical term referring to the personal character);
- express interest in a subject matter (typically found in rapid correspondence);
- establish personal connections with readers, particularly regarding anecdotal or hypothetical situations (common in philosophy, religion, and similar fields, particularly to explore how certain concepts might impact personal life. Additionally, artistic disciplines may also encourage personal perspectives more than other subjects);
- to emphasize or distinguish your perspective while discussing existing literature; and
- to create a conversational tone (rare in academic writing).
The First Person Should Be Avoided When:
- doing so would remove objectivity and give the impression that results or observations are unique to your perspective;
- you wish to maintain an objective tone that would suggest your study minimized biases as best as possible; and
- expressing your thoughts generally (phrases like “I think” are unnecessary because any statement that isn’t cited should be yours).
Usage Examples
The following examples compare the impact of using and avoiding first-person pronouns.
Example 1 (First Person Preferred):
To understand the effects of global warming on coastal regions, changes in sea levels, storm surge occurrences and precipitation amounts were examined .
[Note: When a long phrase acts as the subject of a passive-voice construction, the sentence becomes difficult to digest. Additionally, since the author(s) conducted the research, it would be clearer to specifically mention them when discussing the focus of a project.]
We examined changes in sea levels, storm surge occurrences, and precipitation amounts to understand how global warming impacts coastal regions.
[Note: When describing the focus of a research project, authors often replace “we” with phrases such as “this study” or “this paper.” “We,” however, is acceptable in this context, including for scientific disciplines. In fact, papers published the vast majority of scientific journals these days use “we” to establish an active voice. Be careful when using “this study” or “this paper” with verbs that clearly couldn’t have performed the action. For example, “we attempt to demonstrate” works, but “the study attempts to demonstrate” does not; the study is not a person.]
Example 2 (First Person Discouraged):
From the various data points we have received , we observed that higher frequencies of runoffs from heavy rainfall have occurred in coastal regions where temperatures have increased by at least 0.9°C.
[Note: Introducing personal pronouns when discussing results raises questions regarding the reproducibility of a study. However, mathematics fields generally tolerate phrases such as “in X example, we see…”]
Coastal regions with temperature increases averaging more than 0.9°C experienced higher frequencies of runoffs from heavy rainfall.
[Note: We removed the passive voice and maintained objectivity and assertiveness by specifically identifying the cause-and-effect elements as the actor and recipient of the main action verb. Additionally, in this version, the results appear independent of any person’s perspective.]
Example 3 (First Person Preferred):
In contrast to the study by Jones et al. (2001), which suggests that milk consumption is safe for adults, the Miller study (2005) revealed the potential hazards of ingesting milk. The authors confirm this latter finding.
[Note: “Authors” in the last sentence above is unclear. Does the term refer to Jones et al., Miller, or the authors of the current paper?]
In contrast to the study by Jones et al. (2001), which suggests that milk consumption is safe for adults, the Miller study (2005) revealed the potential hazards of ingesting milk. We confirm this latter finding.
[Note: By using “we,” this sentence clarifies the actor and emphasizes the significance of the recent findings reported in this paper. Indeed, “I” and “we” are acceptable in most scientific fields to compare an author’s works with other researchers’ publications. The APA encourages using personal pronouns for this context. The social sciences broaden this scope to allow discussion of personal perspectives, irrespective of comparisons to other literature.]
Other Tips about Using Personal Pronouns
- Avoid starting a sentence with personal pronouns. The beginning of a sentence is a noticeable position that draws readers’ attention. Thus, using personal pronouns as the first one or two words of a sentence will draw unnecessary attention to them (unless, of course, that was your intent).
- Be careful how you define “we.” It should only refer to the authors and never the audience unless your intention is to write a conversational piece rather than a scholarly document! After all, the readers were not involved in analyzing or formulating the conclusions presented in your paper (although, we note that the point of your paper is to persuade readers to reach the same conclusions you did). While this is not a hard-and-fast rule, if you do want to use “we” to refer to a larger class of people, clearly define the term “we” in the sentence. For example, “As researchers, we frequently question…”
- First-person writing is becoming more acceptable under Modern English usage standards; however, the second-person pronoun “you” is still generally unacceptable because it is too casual for academic writing.
- Take all of the above notes with a grain of salt. That is, double-check your institution or target journal’s author guidelines . Some organizations may prohibit the use of personal pronouns.
- As an extra tip, before submission, you should always read through the most recent issues of a journal to get a better sense of the editors’ preferred writing styles and conventions.
Wordvice Resources
For more general advice on how to use active and passive voice in research papers, on how to paraphrase , or for a list of useful phrases for academic writing , head over to the Wordvice Academic Resources pages . And for more professional proofreading services , visit our Academic Editing and P aper Editing Services pages.
Is It Okay to Use "We" In a Research Paper? Here's What You Need to Know
Explore "we" in research papers: guidelines, alternatives, and considerations for effective academic writing.
![can you say we in a research paper Newspapers and Laptop Stack of Newspapers and Laptop. Daily Journals with News and Personal Computer. Tabloid Papers with Headlines and Articles and Desktop on Screen of Electronic Device. Different Sources of Information research paper stock pictures, royalty-free photos & images](https://cdn.listening.com/IMG_2868 (1).jpg)
Jun 25, 2024
![can you say we in a research paper Is It Okay to Use "We" In a Research Paper? Here's What You Need to Know](https://cdn.listening.com/istockphoto-1131300086-612x612.jpg)
When embarking on the journey of academic writing, particularly in research papers, one of the first questions that often arises is about pronoun usage. Specifically, many writers grapple with the question: Is it okay to use "we" in a research paper?
This seemingly simple grammatical choice carries significant weight in academic circles. Using pronouns, especially first-person pronouns like "we," can influence the tone, clarity, and perceived objectivity of your work. It's a topic that has sparked debates among scholars, with opinions evolving and varying across different disciplines.
The importance of pronoun usage in academic writing cannot be overstated, especially in contexts like thesis and scientific writing. It affects how your research is perceived, how you position yourself as an author, and how you engage with your readers using the first person or third person.
The choice between using "we," maintaining a more impersonal tone, or opting for alternatives can impact the overall effectiveness of your communication.
In this blog post, we'll explore the nuances of using "we" in research papers, examining both traditional and modern perspectives. We'll delve into the pros and cons, provide guidelines for appropriate usage, and offer alternatives to help you confidently navigate writing academic papers.
![can you say we in a research paper mobile mockup listening.com](https://www.listening.com/_astro/mobile-mockup.DAvpZ52A.png)
Traditional Stance on Using "We" in Research Papers
historical preference for third-person perspective.
Academic writing traditionally favored a third-person perspective, especially in scientific fields. This preference emerged in the late 19th century as part of a push for objectivity in scientific communication. The goal was to present research as unbiased facts and observations.
Key aspects:
- Emphasis on passive voice versus active voice when choosing to use the first person or third person in writing a research paper.
- The use of impersonal constructions and passive voice can help avoid personal pronouns.
- Third-person references to authors
Reasons for avoiding first-person pronouns
Arguments against using "we" in research papers:
- Perceived lack of objectivity
- Ambiguity in meaning
- Concerns about formality
- Shift of focus from research to researchers
- Adherence to established conventions
- Avoid presumption in single-authored papers when you decide to use first-person pronouns or not. when you decide to use first-person pronouns or not.
This approach shaped academic writing for decades and still influences some disciplines, especially in the context of writing a research paper. However, attitudes toward pronoun usage have begun to change in recent years.
Changing Perspectives in Academic Writing
Shift towards more personal and engaging academic prose.
Recent years have seen a move towards more accessible academic writing. This shift aims to:
- Increase readability
- Engage readers more effectively by incorporating second-person narrative techniques.
- Acknowledge the researcher's role in the work
- Promote transparency in research processes
Key changes:
- More direct language
- Increased use of active voice can make your academic papers more engaging.
- Greater acceptance of narrative elements
Acceptance of first-person pronouns in some disciplines
Some fields now allow or encourage the use of "we" and other first-person pronouns. This varies by:
- Discipline: More common in humanities and social sciences
- Journal: Some publications explicitly permit or prefer first-person usage
- Type of paper: Often more accepted in qualitative research or opinion pieces
Reasons for acceptance:
- Clarity in describing methods and decisions
- Ownership of ideas and findings is crucial when writing a research paper.
- Improved reader engagement in scientific writing
- Recognition of researcher subjectivity in some fields
However, acceptance is not universal. Many disciplines and publications still prefer traditional, impersonal styles.
When It's Appropriate to Use "We" in Research Papers
![can you say we in a research paper Hands of Businessman Notebook and documents working research paper stock pictures, royalty-free photos & images](https://media.istockphoto.com/id/934662002/photo/hands-of-businessman-notebook-and-documents-working.jpg?s=612x612&w=0&k=20&c=E0TqApoNpd_Xig_JP_pTBsGe5crtz17PFwYa1OefBYM=)
Collaborative research with multiple authors
- Natural fit for papers with multiple contributors
- Accurately reflects joint effort and shared responsibility
- Examples: "We conducted experiments..." or "We conclude that..."
Describing methodology or procedures
- Clarifies who performed specific actions, helping to avoid personal pronouns that might otherwise confuse the audience.
- Adds transparency to the research process, particularly when first-person pronouns are used effectively.
- Example: "We collected data using..."
Presenting arguments or hypotheses
- Demonstrates ownership of ideas
- Can make complex concepts more accessible in a research report.
- Example: "We argue that..." or "We hypothesize..."
Discipline-specific conventions
- Usage varies widely between fields
- More common in Social sciences, Humanities, and Some STEM fields (e.g., computer science)
- Less common in Hard sciences, Medical research
- Always check journal guidelines and field norms, particularly regarding the use of the first person or third person.
Key point: Use "we" judiciously, balancing clarity and convention.
When to Avoid Using "We" in Research Papers
![can you say we in a research paper research Fake Dictionary, definition of the word research. research paper stock pictures, royalty-free photos & images](https://media.istockphoto.com/id/480819919/photo/research.jpg?s=612x612&w=0&k=20&c=xkxhgTxNcBYJYJAwxG9J2Pnetsi5EppuPm4hVHFgO8k=)
Single-authored papers
- Can seem odd or presumptuous
- Alternatives: Use "I" if appropriate, Use passive voice, and Refer to yourself as " the researcher " or "the author"
Presenting factual information or literature reviews
- Facts stand independently of the author
- Keep the focus on the information, not the presenter, when writing a research paper.
- Examples: "Previous studies have shown..." instead of "We know from previous studies..." "The data indicate..." instead of "We see in the data..."
When trying to maintain an objective tone
- Some topics in research reports require a more detached approach.
- Avoid "we" when: Reporting widely accepted facts, Describing established theories, Presenting controversial findings
- Use impersonal constructions: "It was observed that...", "The results suggest..."
Please remember: Always prioritize clarity and follow your field's conventions.
Alternatives to Using "We"
Passive voice.
- Shifts focus to the action or result
- Examples: "The experiment was conducted..." (instead of "We experimented...") "It was observed that..." (instead of "We observed that...")
- Use personal pronouns sparingly to avoid overly complex sentences.
Third-person perspective
- Refers to the research or study itself
- Examples: "This study examines..." (instead of "We examine...") "The results indicate..." (instead of "We found...")
- Can create a more objective tone
Using "the researcher(s)" or "the author(s)"
- Useful for single- authored papers
- Maintains formality while acknowledging human involvement
- Examples: "The researchers collected data..." (instead of "We collected data...") "The author argues..." (instead of "We argue...")
- Can become repetitive if overused in writing research papers.
Tips for using alternatives:
- Vary sentence structure to maintain reader interest
- Ensure clarity is not sacrificed for formality
- Choose the most appropriate alternative based on context
- Consider journal guidelines and field conventions when writing a research paper.
Remember: The goal is clear, effective communication of your research, whether you use first person or third person.
Tips for Effective Academic Writing
Consistency in pronoun usage.
- Choose a style and stick to it throughout
- Avoid mixing "we" with impersonal constructions
- Exceptions: Different sections may require different approaches, Clearly mark any intentional shifts in perspective
Balancing formality with clarity and engagement
- Prioritize clear communication
- Use simple, direct language where possible when writing research papers, and try to use the term that best fits the context.
- Engage readers without sacrificing academic rigor
- Techniques: Use active voice judiciously, Vary sentence structure, Incorporate relevant examples or analogies
Seeking feedback from peers or mentors
- Share drafts with colleagues in your field to improve your research report.
- Ask for specific feedback on writing style
- Consider perspectives from Senior researchers , Peers at similar career stages, Potential target audience members, and how they prefer the use of the first person or third person in research.
- Be open to constructive criticism
Additional tips:
- Read widely in your field to understand style norms when writing research papers.
- Practice different writing styles to find your voice
- Revise and edit multiple times
- Use style guides relevant to your discipline
- Consider the reader's perspective while writing
Remember: Effective academic writing communicates complex ideas while meeting field-specific expectations.
![can you say we in a research paper Computer, brain scan and doctor asian woman in hospital at night for medical, research or learning. Healthcare, thinking and screen with young medicine professional in office of clinic for neurology Computer, thinking and doctor asian woman in hospital at night for medical, research or learning. Healthcare, mri scan on screen with young medicine professional in office of clinic for neurology Researcher stock pictures, royalty-free photos & images](https://media.istockphoto.com/id/1959739742/photo/computer-brain-scan-and-doctor-asian-woman-in-hospital-at-night-for-medical-research-or.jpg?s=612x612&w=0&k=20&c=lE1MWp6uEge4NaGIwUONlm7iFcEoJy7kqqeClpqSsGg=)
Recap of key points
- The use of "we" in research papers is evolving
- Appropriateness depends on Discipline, Journal guidelines, Research type, Personal preference
- Alternatives include passive voice and third-person perspective, while the increased use of passive voice can sometimes create ambiguity.
- Consider audience, field norms, and clarity when choosing a style
- Consistency and balance in the use of first person or third person are crucial.
Encouragement to make informed choices in academic writing
- Understand the context of your work
- Stay informed about current trends in your field
- Prioritize clear communication of your research
- Be confident in your choices, but remain flexible
- Remember: No universal rule fits all situations, Effective writing adapts to its purpose and audience
- Continually refine your writing skills, including the appropriate use of personal pronouns in APA format.
Final thoughts:
- Writing style impacts how your research is received
- Make deliberate choices to enhance your paper's impact by using appropriate personal pronouns.
- Balance tradition with evolving norms in academic writing
- Your unique voice can contribute to advancing your field, particularly in writing a research paper.
Ultimately, choose a style that best serves your research and readers while adhering to relevant guidelines of scientific writing and thesis format. It may also be acceptable to use first-person pronouns where appropriate.
Easily pronounces technical words in any field
Writing Style
Pronoun Usage
Research Papers
Academic Writing
Recent articles
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://cdn.listening.com/kids-1093758_1920.jpg)
What is an Individualized Education Plan (IEP)?
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://cdn.listening.com/320540933_1350783989000282_9206182298970891263_n.jpg)
Aug 1, 2024
Individualized Education Plan
Special Education
IEP Process
Learning Disabilities
Assistive Technology
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://cdn.listening.com/edf3db22ae1a51177997feea0ada3b5f290bab08f1d5e2e1cf9700d14322934c.jpg)
Noam Chomsky's Theory of Language Acquisition
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://cdn.listening.com/IMG_2868.jpg)
Aug 5, 2024
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://cdn.listening.com/istockphoto-1192876328-612x612.jpg)
What are the Responsibilities of a Cosigner in a Student Loan?
Aug 6, 2024
Financial Aid
College Funding
Cosigner Responsibilities
Student Loans
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://cdn.listening.com/photo-1607473129014-0afb7ed09c3a.jpg)
10 Best Productivity Books
Aug 13, 2024
Productivity Books
Time Management
Efficiency Tips
Self Improvement
Goal Setting
![can you say we in a research paper American Psychological Association](https://apastyle.apa.org/Content/Images/megamenu/images@2x/apa-logo.png)
First-Person Pronouns
Use first-person pronouns in APA Style to describe your work as well as your personal reactions.
- If you are writing a paper by yourself, use the pronoun “I” to refer to yourself.
- If you are writing a paper with coauthors, use the pronoun “we” to refer yourself and your coauthors together.
Referring to yourself in the third person
Do not use the third person to refer to yourself. Writers are often tempted to do this as a way to sound more formal or scholarly; however, it can create ambiguity for readers about whether you or someone else performed an action.
Correct: I explored treatments for social anxiety.
Incorrect: The author explored treatments for social anxiety.
First-person pronouns are covered in the seventh edition APA Style manuals in the Publication Manual Section 4.16 and the Concise Guide Section 2.16
![can you say we in a research paper](https://apastyle.apa.org/images/icon-expanded-50x50_tcm11-319243_w1024_n.png)
Editorial “we”
Also avoid the editorial “we” to refer to people in general.
Incorrect: We often worry about what other people think of us.
Instead, specify the meaning of “we”—do you mean other people in general, other people of your age, other students, other psychologists, other nurses, or some other group? The previous sentence can be clarified as follows:
Correct: As young adults, we often worry about what other people think of us. I explored my own experience of social anxiety...
When you use the first person to describe your own actions, readers clearly understand when you are writing about your own work and reactions versus those of other researchers.
![can you say we in a research paper Language Editing](https://www.languageediting.com/wp-content/uploads/logo-cri.png)
Is it acceptable to use “we” in scientific papers?
Some of us were taught in school that the use of first-person personal pronouns makes scientific writing subjective. But it’s not true. Using we or I in a research paper does not always shift the spotlight away from the research. And writing in the third person or using passive voice does not make a piece of research writing objective. So, if a reviewer or thesis advisor tells you to remove all first-person references from your manuscript, know that it is not incorrect to use I or we in a paper, despite what many people believe.
So, the short answer to the question in the title is yes. It is acceptable to use we in your paper to refer to you and your co-authors. Whether you use first person pronouns or not is a writing style choice.
Of course, if your publisher’s guidelines for authors say “don’t use I or we in your manuscript”, avoid using I or we when there are valid alternatives. When the publication of your paper is at stake, don’t argue with the journal editor on matters of writing style. It’s not worth the candle. The good news is that most peer-reviewed journals allow the use of first-person pronouns.
The authorial we (or I ) in scientific papers is not only acceptable but also effective in some cases—for example, when passive voice may introduce ambiguity . For example, compare these two sentences:
Three analyses were conducted by the researchers.
We conducted three analyses.
In the first sentence, it is not clear who the researchers are. Are they the authors of the study or other researchers? However, there is no ambiguity in the second sentence.
Also, it’s natural to write in the first person about a research you and your co-authors personally conducted. Compare
We found an old manuscript
The authors of this paper found an old manuscript
an old manuscript was found .
Finally, writing in the first person is more persuasive than writing impersonal prose, as Helen Sword says in Stylish Academic Writing :
“When we muzzle the personal voice, we risk subverting our whole purpose as researchers, which is to foster change by communicating new knowledge to our intended audience in the most effective and persuasive way possible.”
If you’re not sure whether you should use we in scientific writing, write in a way you’re comfortable with. But avoid awkward expressions such as to the best knowledge of the authors of this paper or the analysis conducted by the authors of this study . Sometimes there is no better option than using first-person pronouns in academic writing. Finally, if you still have doubts, get other people’s opinion.
Do you need a freelance editor for a scientific paper? Send me a message at [email protected].
About Cristina N.
A freelance editor and writer with a keen interest in science, nature, and communication, I love to craft articles that help and inspire people.
How do you refer to a company in third person: it or they?
Aim: help and inspire people to improve their written communications.
Neagu Raluca-Cristina | VAT Registration Number: IT04535070264
© 2015–2024 Neagu Raluca-Cristina
- PROOFREADING
- TERMS OF SERVICE
- PRIVACY POLICY
- TESTIMONIALS
![can you say we in a research paper Enago Academy](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/enago-academy-sitelogo.png)
We Vs. They: Using the First & Third Person in Research Papers
![can you say we in a research paper ' src=](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/cropped-favicon-192x192-1-170x150.png)
Writing in the first , second , or third person is referred to as the author’s point of view . When we write, our tendency is to personalize the text by writing in the first person . That is, we use pronouns such as “I” and “we”. This is acceptable when writing personal information, a journal, or a book. However, it is not common in academic writing.
Some writers find the use of first , second , or third person point of view a bit confusing while writing research papers. Since second person is avoided while writing in academic or scientific papers, the main confusion remains within first or third person.
In the following sections, we will discuss the usage and examples of the first , second , and third person point of view.
First Person Pronouns
The first person point of view simply means that we use the pronouns that refer to ourselves in the text. These are as follows:
Can we use I or We In the Scientific Paper?
Using these, we present the information based on what “we” found. In science and mathematics, this point of view is rarely used. It is often considered to be somewhat self-serving and arrogant . It is important to remember that when writing your research results, the focus of the communication is the research and not the persons who conducted the research. When you want to persuade the reader, it is best to avoid personal pronouns in academic writing even when it is personal opinion from the authors of the study. In addition to sounding somewhat arrogant, the strength of your findings might be underestimated.
For example:
Based on my results, I concluded that A and B did not equal to C.
In this example, the entire meaning of the research could be misconstrued. The results discussed are not those of the author ; they are generated from the experiment. To refer to the results in this context is incorrect and should be avoided. To make it more appropriate, the above sentence can be revised as follows:
Based on the results of the assay, A and B did not equal to C.
Second Person Pronouns
The second person point of view uses pronouns that refer to the reader. These are as follows:
This point of view is usually used in the context of providing instructions or advice , such as in “how to” manuals or recipe books. The reason behind using the second person is to engage the reader.
You will want to buy a turkey that is large enough to feed your extended family. Before cooking it, you must wash it first thoroughly with cold water.
Although this is a good technique for giving instructions, it is not appropriate in academic or scientific writing.
Third Person Pronouns
The third person point of view uses both proper nouns, such as a person’s name, and pronouns that refer to individuals or groups (e.g., doctors, researchers) but not directly to the reader. The ones that refer to individuals are as follows:
- Hers (possessive form)
- His (possessive form)
- Its (possessive form)
- One’s (possessive form)
The third person point of view that refers to groups include the following:
- Their (possessive form)
- Theirs (plural possessive form)
Everyone at the convention was interested in what Dr. Johnson presented. The instructors decided that the students should help pay for lab supplies. The researchers determined that there was not enough sample material to conduct the assay.
The third person point of view is generally used in scientific papers but, at times, the format can be difficult. We use indefinite pronouns to refer back to the subject but must avoid using masculine or feminine terminology. For example:
A researcher must ensure that he has enough material for his experiment. The nurse must ensure that she has a large enough blood sample for her assay.
Many authors attempt to resolve this issue by using “he or she” or “him or her,” but this gets cumbersome and too many of these can distract the reader. For example:
A researcher must ensure that he or she has enough material for his or her experiment. The nurse must ensure that he or she has a large enough blood sample for his or her assay.
These issues can easily be resolved by making the subjects plural as follows:
Researchers must ensure that they have enough material for their experiment. Nurses must ensure that they have large enough blood samples for their assay.
Exceptions to the Rules
As mentioned earlier, the third person is generally used in scientific writing, but the rules are not quite as stringent anymore. It is now acceptable to use both the first and third person pronouns in some contexts, but this is still under controversy.
In a February 2011 blog on Eloquent Science , Professor David M. Schultz presented several opinions on whether the author viewpoints differed. However, there appeared to be no consensus. Some believed that the old rules should stand to avoid subjectivity, while others believed that if the facts were valid, it didn’t matter which point of view was used.
First or Third Person: What Do The Journals Say
In general, it is acceptable in to use the first person point of view in abstracts, introductions, discussions, and conclusions, in some journals. Even then, avoid using “I” in these sections. Instead, use “we” to refer to the group of researchers that were part of the study. The third person point of view is used for writing methods and results sections. Consistency is the key and switching from one point of view to another within sections of a manuscript can be distracting and is discouraged. It is best to always check your author guidelines for that particular journal. Once that is done, make sure your manuscript is free from the above-mentioned or any other grammatical error.
You are the only researcher involved in your thesis project. You want to avoid using the first person point of view throughout, but there are no other researchers on the project so the pronoun “we” would not be appropriate. What do you do and why? Please let us know your thoughts in the comments section below.
![can you say we in a research paper ' src=](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/ap_avatars/cfcd208495d565ef66e7dff9f98764da.jpg)
I am writing the history of an engineering company for which I worked. How do I relate a significant incident that involved me?
![can you say we in a research paper ' src=](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/2-170x150.png)
Hi Roger, Thank you for your question. If you are narrating the history for the company that you worked at, you would have to refer to it from an employee’s perspective (third person). If you are writing the history as an account of your experiences with the company (including the significant incident), you could refer to yourself as ”I” or ”My.” (first person) You could go through other articles related to language and grammar on Enago Academy’s website https://enago.com/academy/ to help you with your document drafting. Did you get a chance to install our free Mobile App? https://www.enago.com/academy/mobile-app/ . Make sure you subscribe to our weekly newsletter: https://www.enago.com/academy/subscribe-now/ .
Good day , i am writing a research paper and m y setting is a company . is it ethical to put the name of the company in the research paper . i the management has allowed me to conduct my research in thir company .
thanks docarlene diaz
Generally authors do not mention the names of the organization separately within the research paper. The name of the educational institution the researcher or the PhD student is working in needs to be mentioned along with the name in the list of authors. However, if the research has been carried out in a company, it might not be mandatory to mention the name after the name in the list of authors. You can check with the author guidelines of your target journal and if needed confirm with the editor of the journal. Also check with the mangement of the company whether they want the name of the company to be mentioned in the research paper.
Finishing up my dissertation the information is clear and concise.
How to write the right first person pronoun if there is a single researcher? Thanks
Rate this article Cancel Reply
Your email address will not be published.
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/800-X-210-1.jpg)
Enago Academy's Most Popular Articles
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/iwwa_dashboard.png)
Sign-up to read more
Subscribe for free to get unrestricted access to all our resources on research writing and academic publishing including:
- 2000+ blog articles
- 50+ Webinars
- 10+ Expert podcasts
- 50+ Infographics
- 10+ Checklists
- Research Guides
We hate spam too. We promise to protect your privacy and never spam you.
- Reporting Research
- Industry News
- Publishing Research
- AI in Academia
- Promoting Research
- Career Corner
- Diversity and Inclusion
- Infographics
- Expert Video Library
- Other Resources
- Enago Learn
- Upcoming & On-Demand Webinars
- Peer Review Week 2024
- Open Access Week 2023
- Conference Videos
- Enago Report
- Journal Finder
- Enago Plagiarism & AI Grammar Check
- Editing Services
- Publication Support Services
- Research Impact
- Translation Services
- Publication solutions
- AI-Based Solutions
- Thought Leadership
- Call for Articles
- Call for Speakers
- Author Training
- Edit Profile
I am looking for Editing/ Proofreading services for my manuscript Tentative date of next journal submission:
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://www.enago.com/academy/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/ai-survey-sticky.jpg)
In your opinion, what is the most effective way to improve integrity in the peer review process?
Stack Exchange Network
Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow , the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Q&A for work
Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.
Single author scientific paper, 'we' or 'I'?
I am authoring a single author paper. Usually when referring to oneself in a paper, 'we' is used. In single author papers I found both 'we' and 'I' (e.g., 'here we/I report xyz').
Which one is stylistically better? To me 'we' seems odd when I read a single author paper.
- scientific-publishing
![can you say we in a research paper Monica Cellio's user avatar](https://i.sstatic.net/4Jjez.png?s=64)
- 5 Already answered here: academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2945/… – Dan Romik Commented Nov 23, 2016 at 16:58
- I think your question has more to do with the fact that it's a scientific paper than the appropriateness of writing style. – user6035379 Commented Nov 23, 2016 at 19:17
- @DanRomik thank you for that link, this basically answered my question. – Dahlai Commented Nov 24, 2016 at 10:28
- What did you use finally? We or I? I think I am encountering the same problem here. – Lin Cheng Commented Aug 3, 2020 at 21:27
- I followed @DanRomik's and Monical Cellio's suggestions – Dahlai Commented Aug 5, 2020 at 7:55
5 Answers 5
The convention in scientific writing, at least in the hard sciences, is to avoid "I" even for single-author papers. I suspect (but can't prove) that this is why you see so much passive voice in such papers ("the doohickey was then frobitzed to induce a somethingorother reaction").
According to this well-received answer on Academia , you can view use of "we" as an editorial "we" or "we, as in the author and the readers". The latter approach works better for descriptive writing ("we see the following results...") than reporting ("we did X").
Ultimately you should base your decision on the submission requirements of the institution where you intend to publish the paper. But in general, "I" is uncommon, "we" is used even for single-author papers, and you can use "we" in a way that doesn't have to seem weird.
If it's a single author, use I. I is for singular, and if you are doing the research and all that stuff by yourself, then take credit, unless someone's helped you. If you use "we", then there must be more people other than you doing the research, or someone has been helping you.
Check here for more information.
![can you say we in a research paper Sweet_Cherry's user avatar](https://i.sstatic.net/CPXQ9.png?s=64)
If you are the only one behind the research and the writing behind the paper, I is a singular term and should therefore should be used instead of we. There is no "we" behind the paper if there was only one person masterminding the project. Although, If this was a formal Scientific paper, It Usually is incorrect to refer to ones self during the script; the point is to present your point, not the fact that you found it(although if you found something completely unique and incredibly interesting, by all means, announce the fact of your hand behind the discovery-outside of the paper.)
![can you say we in a research paper Mathematica Extrordinaire's user avatar](https://i.sstatic.net/bAsCr.jpg?s=64)
I would like to add to this debate (and maybe introduce some updated information) by pointing out that the American Psychological Association (APA) appears to recommend the first-person singular for works authored by a single person.
Furthermore, they problematize the use of third-person constructions (e.g., "The author ...").
https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/grammar/first-person-pronouns
So most scientific papers are written with multiple voices. In the introduction the problem is discussed and the writing will refer to "This Study" or "This experiment" if it must refer to narrative person.
The second part describes the steps taken to get the results which will be discussed further in the paper. As this section is written as a set of instructions, the second person imperative voice is used, often with an implied "you" as the subject of the sentance (you do not write "you" but skip the subject and write the imperative verb.).
The next section is the results which is written in the form of a third person objective voice. In Third Person Objective, the writer should describe only the information that can be observed with the sense. This is often refered to as "Third Person Roving Camera" as most audio-visual media rely on Third Person Objective.
Finally, the conclusion should return to the same voice as the introduction. The conclusion should refer to the conclusion of the experiment and rely soley on the results as the basis of any statements made. The narrator should not speculate but merely states that the result sets do not support a conclusion to any questions or that the question asked is outside of the scope of the experiment or study.
Your Answer
Reminder: Answers generated by artificial intelligence tools are not allowed on Writing Stack Exchange. Learn more
Sign up or log in
Post as a guest.
Required, but never shown
By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy .
Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged style scientific-publishing or ask your own question .
- Featured on Meta
- Bringing clarity to status tag usage on meta sites
- We've made changes to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy - July 2024
- Announcing a change to the data-dump process
Hot Network Questions
- How do you determine what order to process chained events/interactions?
- about flag changes in 16-bit calculations on the MC6800
- Why doesn't the world fill with time travelers?
- How Can this Limit be really Evaluated?
- Simple casino game
- Equations for dual cubic curves
- Is it possible to create a board position where White must make the move that leads to stalemating Black to avoid Black stalemating White?
- A string view over a Java String
- How to allocate memory in NASM without C functions (x64)?
- 3 Aspects of Voltage that contradict each other
- If inflation/cost of living is such a complex difficult problem, then why has the price of drugs been absoultly perfectly stable my whole life?
- Topology on a module over a topological ring
- How to total time duration for an arbitrary number of tracked tasks in Excel?
- Is there a faster way of expanding multiple polynomials with power?
- How long does it take to achieve buoyancy in a body of water?
- Philosophies about how childhood beliefs influence / shape adult thoughts
- What happens if all nine Supreme Justices recuse themselves?
- DATEDIFF Rounding
- Reusing own code at work without losing licence
- I'm trying to remember a novel about an asteroid threatening to destroy the earth. I remember seeing the phrase "SHIVA IS COMING" on the cover
- Exact time point of assignment
- How do I safely remove a mystery cast iron pipe in my basement?
- Story where character has "boomerdisc"
- What is this strengthening dent called in a sheet metal part?
![can you say we in a research paper Quetext](https://blog.quetext.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/blog-logo.png)
- Tips & Guides
How To Avoid Using “We,” “You,” And “I” in an Essay
- Posted on October 27, 2022 October 27, 2022
Maintaining a formal voice while writing academic essays and papers is essential to sound objective.
One of the main rules of academic or formal writing is to avoid first-person pronouns like “we,” “you,” and “I.” These words pull focus away from the topic and shift it to the speaker – the opposite of your goal.
While it may seem difficult at first, some tricks can help you avoid personal language and keep a professional tone.
Let’s learn how to avoid using “we” in an essay.
What Is a Personal Pronoun?
Pronouns are words used to refer to a noun indirectly. Examples include “he,” “his,” “her,” and “hers.” Any time you refer to a noun – whether a person, object, or animal – without using its name, you use a pronoun.
Personal pronouns are a type of pronoun. A personal pronoun is a pronoun you use whenever you directly refer to the subject of the sentence.
Take the following short paragraph as an example:
“Mr. Smith told the class yesterday to work on our essays. Mr. Smith also said that Mr. Smith lost Mr. Smith’s laptop in the lunchroom.”
The above sentence contains no pronouns at all. There are three places where you would insert a pronoun, but only two where you would put a personal pronoun. See the revised sentence below:
“Mr. Smith told the class yesterday to work on our essays. He also said that he lost his laptop in the lunchroom.”
“He” is a personal pronoun because we are talking directly about Mr. Smith. “His” is not a personal pronoun (it’s a possessive pronoun) because we are not speaking directly about Mr. Smith. Rather, we are talking about Mr. Smith’s laptop.
If later on you talk about Mr. Smith’s laptop, you may say:
“Mr. Smith found it in his car, not the lunchroom!”
In this case, “it” is a personal pronoun because in this point of view we are making a reference to the laptop directly and not as something owned by Mr. Smith.
Why Avoid Personal Pronouns in Essay Writing
We’re teaching you how to avoid using “I” in writing, but why is this necessary? Academic writing aims to focus on a clear topic, sound objective, and paint the writer as a source of authority. Word choice can significantly impact your success in achieving these goals.
Writing that uses personal pronouns can unintentionally shift the reader’s focus onto the writer, pulling their focus away from the topic at hand.
Personal pronouns may also make your work seem less objective.
One of the most challenging parts of essay writing is learning which words to avoid and how to avoid them. Fortunately, following a few simple tricks, you can master the English Language and write like a pro in no time.
Alternatives To Using Personal Pronouns
How to not use “I” in a paper? What are the alternatives? There are many ways to avoid the use of personal pronouns in academic writing. By shifting your word choice and sentence structure, you can keep the overall meaning of your sentences while re-shaping your tone.
Utilize Passive Voice
In conventional writing, students are taught to avoid the passive voice as much as possible, but it can be an excellent way to avoid first-person pronouns in academic writing.
You can use the passive voice to avoid using pronouns. Take this sentence, for example:
“ We used 150 ml of HCl for the experiment.”
Instead of using “we” and the active voice, you can use a passive voice without a pronoun. The sentence above becomes:
“150 ml of HCl were used for the experiment.”
Using the passive voice removes your team from the experiment and makes your work sound more objective.
Take a Third-Person Perspective
Another answer to “how to avoid using ‘we’ in an essay?” is the use of a third-person perspective. Changing the perspective is a good way to take first-person pronouns out of a sentence. A third-person point of view will not use any first-person pronouns because the information is not given from the speaker’s perspective.
A third-person sentence is spoken entirely about the subject where the speaker is outside of the sentence.
Take a look at the sentence below:
“In this article you will learn about formal writing.”
The perspective in that sentence is second person, and it uses the personal pronoun “you.” You can change this sentence to sound more objective by using third-person pronouns:
“In this article the reader will learn about formal writing.”
The use of a third-person point of view makes the second sentence sound more academic and confident. Second-person pronouns, like those used in the first sentence, sound less formal and objective.
Be Specific With Word Choice
You can avoid first-personal pronouns by choosing your words carefully. Often, you may find that you are inserting unnecessary nouns into your work.
Take the following sentence as an example:
“ My research shows the students did poorly on the test.”
In this case, the first-person pronoun ‘my’ can be entirely cut out from the sentence. It then becomes:
“Research shows the students did poorly on the test.”
The second sentence is more succinct and sounds more authoritative without changing the sentence structure.
You should also make sure to watch out for the improper use of adverbs and nouns. Being careful with your word choice regarding nouns, adverbs, verbs, and adjectives can help mitigate your use of personal pronouns.
“They bravely started the French revolution in 1789.”
While this sentence might be fine in a story about the revolution, an essay or academic piece should only focus on the facts. The world ‘bravely’ is a good indicator that you are inserting unnecessary personal pronouns into your work.
We can revise this sentence into:
“The French revolution started in 1789.”
Avoid adverbs (adjectives that describe verbs), and you will find that you avoid personal pronouns by default.
Closing Thoughts
In academic writing, It is crucial to sound objective and focus on the topic. Using personal pronouns pulls the focus away from the subject and makes writing sound subjective.
Hopefully, this article has helped you learn how to avoid using “we” in an essay.
When working on any formal writing assignment, avoid personal pronouns and informal language as much as possible.
While getting the hang of academic writing, you will likely make some mistakes, so revising is vital. Always double-check for personal pronouns, plagiarism , spelling mistakes, and correctly cited pieces.
You can prevent and correct mistakes using a plagiarism checker at any time, completely for free.
Quetext is a platform that helps you with all those tasks. Check out all resources that are available to you today.
Sign Up for Quetext Today!
Click below to find a pricing plan that fits your needs.
You May Also Like
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://blog.quetext.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/AdobeStock_741192718-320x240.jpeg?crop=1)
The 9 Best AI Detector Tools to Uncover AI Content
- Posted on August 22, 2024
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://blog.quetext.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/AdobeStock_281903654-320x240.jpeg?crop=1)
The Importance of Proofreading: Techniques for Catching Errors and Polishing Your Writing
- Posted on August 16, 2024 August 19, 2024
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://blog.quetext.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/AdobeStock_884660027-320x240.jpeg?crop=1)
The Benefits of Peer Review: How to Give and Receive Constructive Feedback on Your Writing
- Posted on August 9, 2024
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://blog.quetext.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/AdobeStock_799429178-320x240.jpeg?crop=1)
Teaching Students About Plagiarism: Strategies for Promoting Academic Integrity
- Posted on August 2, 2024
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://blog.quetext.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/AdobeStock_831875233-320x240.jpeg?crop=1)
Encouraging Proper Citation Practices: Tips for Teaching Students How to Cite Sources Correctly and Ethically
- Posted on July 22, 2024
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://blog.quetext.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/AdobeStock_333724020-320x240.jpeg?crop=1)
A Guide to Paraphrasing Poetry, With Examples
- Posted on July 12, 2024
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://blog.quetext.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/AdobeStock_636129332-320x240.jpeg?crop=1)
Preparing Students for the Future: AI Literacy and Digital Citizenship
- Posted on July 5, 2024
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://blog.quetext.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/AdobeStock_268890612-320x240.jpeg?crop=1)
How to Summarize a Paper, a Story, a Book, a Report or an Essay
- Posted on June 25, 2024 June 25, 2024
Input your search keywords and press Enter.
![can you say we in a research paper The Writing Center • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill](https://writingcenter.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/346/2018/08/writingcenterlogo-oneline.png)
Should I Use “I”?
What this handout is about.
This handout is about determining when to use first person pronouns (“I”, “we,” “me,” “us,” “my,” and “our”) and personal experience in academic writing. “First person” and “personal experience” might sound like two ways of saying the same thing, but first person and personal experience can work in very different ways in your writing. You might choose to use “I” but not make any reference to your individual experiences in a particular paper. Or you might include a brief description of an experience that could help illustrate a point you’re making without ever using the word “I.” So whether or not you should use first person and personal experience are really two separate questions, both of which this handout addresses. It also offers some alternatives if you decide that either “I” or personal experience isn’t appropriate for your project. If you’ve decided that you do want to use one of them, this handout offers some ideas about how to do so effectively, because in many cases using one or the other might strengthen your writing.
Expectations about academic writing
Students often arrive at college with strict lists of writing rules in mind. Often these are rather strict lists of absolutes, including rules both stated and unstated:
- Each essay should have exactly five paragraphs.
- Don’t begin a sentence with “and” or “because.”
- Never include personal opinion.
- Never use “I” in essays.
We get these ideas primarily from teachers and other students. Often these ideas are derived from good advice but have been turned into unnecessarily strict rules in our minds. The problem is that overly strict rules about writing can prevent us, as writers, from being flexible enough to learn to adapt to the writing styles of different fields, ranging from the sciences to the humanities, and different kinds of writing projects, ranging from reviews to research.
So when it suits your purpose as a scholar, you will probably need to break some of the old rules, particularly the rules that prohibit first person pronouns and personal experience. Although there are certainly some instructors who think that these rules should be followed (so it is a good idea to ask directly), many instructors in all kinds of fields are finding reason to depart from these rules. Avoiding “I” can lead to awkwardness and vagueness, whereas using it in your writing can improve style and clarity. Using personal experience, when relevant, can add concreteness and even authority to writing that might otherwise be vague and impersonal. Because college writing situations vary widely in terms of stylistic conventions, tone, audience, and purpose, the trick is deciphering the conventions of your writing context and determining how your purpose and audience affect the way you write. The rest of this handout is devoted to strategies for figuring out when to use “I” and personal experience.
Effective uses of “I”:
In many cases, using the first person pronoun can improve your writing, by offering the following benefits:
- Assertiveness: In some cases you might wish to emphasize agency (who is doing what), as for instance if you need to point out how valuable your particular project is to an academic discipline or to claim your unique perspective or argument.
- Clarity: Because trying to avoid the first person can lead to awkward constructions and vagueness, using the first person can improve your writing style.
- Positioning yourself in the essay: In some projects, you need to explain how your research or ideas build on or depart from the work of others, in which case you’ll need to say “I,” “we,” “my,” or “our”; if you wish to claim some kind of authority on the topic, first person may help you do so.
Deciding whether “I” will help your style
Here is an example of how using the first person can make the writing clearer and more assertive:
Original example:
In studying American popular culture of the 1980s, the question of to what degree materialism was a major characteristic of the cultural milieu was explored.
Better example using first person:
In our study of American popular culture of the 1980s, we explored the degree to which materialism characterized the cultural milieu.
The original example sounds less emphatic and direct than the revised version; using “I” allows the writers to avoid the convoluted construction of the original and clarifies who did what.
Here is an example in which alternatives to the first person would be more appropriate:
As I observed the communication styles of first-year Carolina women, I noticed frequent use of non-verbal cues.
Better example:
A study of the communication styles of first-year Carolina women revealed frequent use of non-verbal cues.
In the original example, using the first person grounds the experience heavily in the writer’s subjective, individual perspective, but the writer’s purpose is to describe a phenomenon that is in fact objective or independent of that perspective. Avoiding the first person here creates the desired impression of an observed phenomenon that could be reproduced and also creates a stronger, clearer statement.
Here’s another example in which an alternative to first person works better:
As I was reading this study of medieval village life, I noticed that social class tended to be clearly defined.
This study of medieval village life reveals that social class tended to be clearly defined.
Although you may run across instructors who find the casual style of the original example refreshing, they are probably rare. The revised version sounds more academic and renders the statement more assertive and direct.
Here’s a final example:
I think that Aristotle’s ethical arguments are logical and readily applicable to contemporary cases, or at least it seems that way to me.
Better example
Aristotle’s ethical arguments are logical and readily applicable to contemporary cases.
In this example, there is no real need to announce that that statement about Aristotle is your thought; this is your paper, so readers will assume that the ideas in it are yours.
Determining whether to use “I” according to the conventions of the academic field
Which fields allow “I”?
The rules for this are changing, so it’s always best to ask your instructor if you’re not sure about using first person. But here are some general guidelines.
Sciences: In the past, scientific writers avoided the use of “I” because scientists often view the first person as interfering with the impression of objectivity and impersonality they are seeking to create. But conventions seem to be changing in some cases—for instance, when a scientific writer is describing a project she is working on or positioning that project within the existing research on the topic. Check with your science instructor to find out whether it’s o.k. to use “I” in their class.
Social Sciences: Some social scientists try to avoid “I” for the same reasons that other scientists do. But first person is becoming more commonly accepted, especially when the writer is describing their project or perspective.
Humanities: Ask your instructor whether you should use “I.” The purpose of writing in the humanities is generally to offer your own analysis of language, ideas, or a work of art. Writers in these fields tend to value assertiveness and to emphasize agency (who’s doing what), so the first person is often—but not always—appropriate. Sometimes writers use the first person in a less effective way, preceding an assertion with “I think,” “I feel,” or “I believe” as if such a phrase could replace a real defense of an argument. While your audience is generally interested in your perspective in the humanities fields, readers do expect you to fully argue, support, and illustrate your assertions. Personal belief or opinion is generally not sufficient in itself; you will need evidence of some kind to convince your reader.
Other writing situations: If you’re writing a speech, use of the first and even the second person (“you”) is generally encouraged because these personal pronouns can create a desirable sense of connection between speaker and listener and can contribute to the sense that the speaker is sincere and involved in the issue. If you’re writing a resume, though, avoid the first person; describe your experience, education, and skills without using a personal pronoun (for example, under “Experience” you might write “Volunteered as a peer counselor”).
A note on the second person “you”:
In situations where your intention is to sound conversational and friendly because it suits your purpose, as it does in this handout intended to offer helpful advice, or in a letter or speech, “you” might help to create just the sense of familiarity you’re after. But in most academic writing situations, “you” sounds overly conversational, as for instance in a claim like “when you read the poem ‘The Wasteland,’ you feel a sense of emptiness.” In this case, the “you” sounds overly conversational. The statement would read better as “The poem ‘The Wasteland’ creates a sense of emptiness.” Academic writers almost always use alternatives to the second person pronoun, such as “one,” “the reader,” or “people.”
Personal experience in academic writing
The question of whether personal experience has a place in academic writing depends on context and purpose. In papers that seek to analyze an objective principle or data as in science papers, or in papers for a field that explicitly tries to minimize the effect of the researcher’s presence such as anthropology, personal experience would probably distract from your purpose. But sometimes you might need to explicitly situate your position as researcher in relation to your subject of study. Or if your purpose is to present your individual response to a work of art, to offer examples of how an idea or theory might apply to life, or to use experience as evidence or a demonstration of an abstract principle, personal experience might have a legitimate role to play in your academic writing. Using personal experience effectively usually means keeping it in the service of your argument, as opposed to letting it become an end in itself or take over the paper.
It’s also usually best to keep your real or hypothetical stories brief, but they can strengthen arguments in need of concrete illustrations or even just a little more vitality.
Here are some examples of effective ways to incorporate personal experience in academic writing:
- Anecdotes: In some cases, brief examples of experiences you’ve had or witnessed may serve as useful illustrations of a point you’re arguing or a theory you’re evaluating. For instance, in philosophical arguments, writers often use a real or hypothetical situation to illustrate abstract ideas and principles.
- References to your own experience can explain your interest in an issue or even help to establish your authority on a topic.
- Some specific writing situations, such as application essays, explicitly call for discussion of personal experience.
Here are some suggestions about including personal experience in writing for specific fields:
Philosophy: In philosophical writing, your purpose is generally to reconstruct or evaluate an existing argument, and/or to generate your own. Sometimes, doing this effectively may involve offering a hypothetical example or an illustration. In these cases, you might find that inventing or recounting a scenario that you’ve experienced or witnessed could help demonstrate your point. Personal experience can play a very useful role in your philosophy papers, as long as you always explain to the reader how the experience is related to your argument. (See our handout on writing in philosophy for more information.)
Religion: Religion courses might seem like a place where personal experience would be welcomed. But most religion courses take a cultural, historical, or textual approach, and these generally require objectivity and impersonality. So although you probably have very strong beliefs or powerful experiences in this area that might motivate your interest in the field, they shouldn’t supplant scholarly analysis. But ask your instructor, as it is possible that they are interested in your personal experiences with religion, especially in less formal assignments such as response papers. (See our handout on writing in religious studies for more information.)
Literature, Music, Fine Arts, and Film: Writing projects in these fields can sometimes benefit from the inclusion of personal experience, as long as it isn’t tangential. For instance, your annoyance over your roommate’s habits might not add much to an analysis of “Citizen Kane.” However, if you’re writing about Ridley Scott’s treatment of relationships between women in the movie “Thelma and Louise,” some reference your own observations about these relationships might be relevant if it adds to your analysis of the film. Personal experience can be especially appropriate in a response paper, or in any kind of assignment that asks about your experience of the work as a reader or viewer. Some film and literature scholars are interested in how a film or literary text is received by different audiences, so a discussion of how a particular viewer or reader experiences or identifies with the piece would probably be appropriate. (See our handouts on writing about fiction , art history , and drama for more information.)
Women’s Studies: Women’s Studies classes tend to be taught from a feminist perspective, a perspective which is generally interested in the ways in which individuals experience gender roles. So personal experience can often serve as evidence for your analytical and argumentative papers in this field. This field is also one in which you might be asked to keep a journal, a kind of writing that requires you to apply theoretical concepts to your experiences.
History: If you’re analyzing a historical period or issue, personal experience is less likely to advance your purpose of objectivity. However, some kinds of historical scholarship do involve the exploration of personal histories. So although you might not be referencing your own experience, you might very well be discussing other people’s experiences as illustrations of their historical contexts. (See our handout on writing in history for more information.)
Sciences: Because the primary purpose is to study data and fixed principles in an objective way, personal experience is less likely to have a place in this kind of writing. Often, as in a lab report, your goal is to describe observations in such a way that a reader could duplicate the experiment, so the less extra information, the better. Of course, if you’re working in the social sciences, case studies—accounts of the personal experiences of other people—are a crucial part of your scholarship. (See our handout on writing in the sciences for more information.)
You may reproduce it for non-commercial use if you use the entire handout and attribute the source: The Writing Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Make a Gift
Stack Exchange Network
Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow , the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Q&A for work
Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.
Do I have to use "I" or "we" when orally presenting my scientific thesis written by a single author? [closed]
I know that in a scientific paper or thesis made by a single author, it is common to use we . (This is also recommended at our university.)
But what about when you alone are presenting a thesis work orally?
At first glance, it is quite odd to use we when the work is written only by you yourself and you are presenting it alone.
For example, saying:
We will present you my machine learning model...
while at the same time you stand alone in front of the examiners seems very strange to me.
Is this style of presentation expected, tolerated, or forbidden?
- scientific-language
- 1 If there's only one of you on stage, I would find "We will present..." a little odd but whether it's "my machine learning model..." or "our machine learning model..." will depend on who is being represented. – KillingTime Commented Jun 17, 2019 at 9:41
- Is it the product of a single researcher or a group? – zeroone Commented Jun 17, 2019 at 11:30
- I'd say it depends on how many authors there are. "We" if there are multiple, even if you are presenting on your own. Alternatively it can be "I'll now present OUR machine learning model" to point out that you are presenting results of a group. – M i ech Commented Jun 17, 2019 at 11:40
- I used “I” in my Oxford D Phil thesis, and that was 50 years ago! When you write “it is recommended”, you are avoiding telling us who advocated this antiquated convention. More to the point, you present your model to someone, and in English-speaking countries they are examiners, not a jury. – David Commented Jun 17, 2019 at 19:51
- 1 Note that you may get a more suitable audience for your question on Academia . Just make sure to distinguish it from this one . – Wrzlprmft Commented Jun 22, 2019 at 15:56
2 Answers 2
We will be presenting my machine learning model,
is completely wrong. When you are writing a thesis, you would use we instead of I and our instead of my . The we combined with the my doesn't work. Similarly, this combination doesn't work when giving an single-presenter oral presentation. It implies that several people are speaking, but somehow that only one person came up with the machine learning model.
In an oral presentation, you should use I when you want to refer to yourself as the person giving the presentation. For your work, you can either use I/me/my or we/us/our . If it was joint work with somebody else, definitely use we/us/our . If it's your own single-authored work, I think using I/me/my is more common, but I don't think anything is wrong with using the scientific we/us/our .
So in an oral presentation, you should say one of:
I will be presenting my machine learning model, I will be presenting our machine learning model.
I suspect you are getting up on the rule that, traditionally, scientific theses were written in the passive voice and avoided any kind of personal pronoun.
For example:
The results of experiment X are compared to the results from experiment Y.
Not " I compared the results from experiment X..... "
Apparently though, thoughts on this have changed in more recent times and it is more common to use personal pronouns in research writing.
This article by Professor of Statistics and Head of the Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics at Monash University Rob J Hyndman suggests:
- Write in the most natural way. It is ok if that means using “I”.
- Use “we” if you mean “the reader and I”, or if you are writing a co-authored paper.
- Don’t use “we” if you only mean yourself.
Not only does it seems logical that you would use the same approach when presenting a thesis as when writing it, but it would also be very odd to present something orally in the passive voice. At the very least it would be very dry and un-engaging.
![can you say we in a research paper Astralbee's user avatar](https://i.sstatic.net/4lI4f.jpg?s=64)
- 2 Has there ever been a time when oral scientific presentations (which is what the OP is asking about) were delivered in the passive voice? – Peter Shor Commented Jun 17, 2019 at 10:39
- @PeterShor No, good point - I got a bit lost making my point halfway through. I have edited to try and make that stand out. – Astralbee Commented Jun 17, 2019 at 11:31
- Using passive voice is an option, thank you for your suggestion. Although it sounds "boring" to me to use it constantly. Also, it is not recommended by my university to use passive voice for the same reason, but that applies only when writing a thesis, for a presentation, no guidelines were given. If I understand correctly, you advise in this situation to use "I" since this is a product of one author? – user3183052 Commented Jun 17, 2019 at 21:31
Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged speech academia register scientific-language or ask your own question .
- Featured on Meta
- Bringing clarity to status tag usage on meta sites
- We've made changes to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy - July 2024
- Announcing a change to the data-dump process
Hot Network Questions
- Meaning of “ ’thwart” in a 19th century poem
- What is this strengthening dent called in a sheet metal part?
- Passport Carry in Taiwan
- Change output language of internal commands like "lpstat"?
- Topology on a module over a topological ring
- My colleagues and I are travelling to UK as delegates in an event and the company is paying for all our travel expenses. what documents are required
- How to total time duration for an arbitrary number of tracked tasks in Excel?
- Do metal objects attract lightning?
- I'm trying to remember a novel about an asteroid threatening to destroy the earth. I remember seeing the phrase "SHIVA IS COMING" on the cover
- Why did General Leslie Groves evade Robert Oppenheimer's question here?
- 3 Aspects of Voltage that contradict each other
- How to attach a 4x8 plywood to a air hockey table
- If inflation/cost of living is such a complex difficult problem, then why has the price of drugs been absoultly perfectly stable my whole life?
- Does the Greek used in 1 Peter 3:7 properly translate as “weaker” and in what way might that be applied?
- Should I report a review I suspect to be AI-generated?
- How could Bangladesh protect itself from Indian dams and barrages?
- Could someone tell me what this part of an A320 is called in English?
- Does Vexing Bauble counter taxed 0 mana spells?
- Fill a grid with numbers so that each row/column calculation yields the same number
- How bad would near constant dreary/gloomy/stormy weather on our or an Earthlike world be for us and the environment?
- What would the appropriate cost be for a magical set of full plate with a Cast On and Cast Off property?
- Why an Out Parameter can be left unassigned in .NET 6 but not .NET 8 (CS0177)?
- How can you trust a forensic scientist to have maintained the chain of custody?
- Equations for dual cubic curves
Stack Exchange Network
Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow , the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Q&A for work
Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.
Choice of personal pronoun in single-author papers
Which personal pronoun is appropriate in single-author papers - 'I' or 'we'? Could the use of 'I' be considered egotistical? Or will the use of 'we' be considered to be grammatically incorrect?
- publications
- writing-style
![can you say we in a research paper amoeba's user avatar](https://i.sstatic.net/XZ9I6.jpg?s=64)
- see also hsm.stackexchange.com/questions/2002/… – GEdgar Commented Apr 30, 2016 at 21:15
- 1 Your question is similar to academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11659/… – Richard Erickson Commented Dec 14, 2017 at 17:04
- 15 Easy solution: get a co-author. It wouldn't be the first time – Davidmh Commented Dec 14, 2017 at 17:22
7 Answers 7
Very rarely is 'I' used in scholarly writing (at least in math and the sciences). A much more common choice is 'we', as in "the author and the reader". For example: "We examine the case when..."
One exception to this rule is if you're writing a memoir or some other sort of "personal piece" for which the identity of the author is particularly relevant.
Now let me quote Paul Halmos (Section 12 of "How to Write Mathematics"):
One aspect of expository style that frequently bothers beginning authors is the use of the editorial "we", as opposed to the singular "I", or the neutral "one". It is in matters like this that common sense is most important. For what it's worth, I present here my recommendation. Since the best expository style is the least obtrusive one, I tend nowadays to prefer the neutral approach. That does not mean using "one" often, or ever; sentences like "one has thus proved that..." are awful. It does mean the complete avoidance of the first person pronouns in either singular or plural. "Since p , it follows that q ." "This implies p ." "An application of p to q yields r ." Most (all ?) mathematical writing is (should be ?) factual; simple declarative statements are the best for communicating facts. A frequently effective time-saving device is the use of the imperative. "To find p , multiply q by r ." "Given p , put q equal to r ."... There is nothing wrong with the editorial "we", but if you like it, do not misuse it. Let "we" mean "the author and the reader" (or "the lecturer and the audience"). Thus, it is fine to say "Using Lemma 2 we can generalize Theorem 1", or "Lemma 3 gives us a technique for proving Theorem 4". It is not good to say "Our work on this result was done in 1969" (unless the voice is that of two authors, or more, speaking in unison), and "We thank our wife for her help with the typing" is always bad. The use of "I", and especially its overuse, sometimes has a repellent effect, as arrogance or ex-cathedra preaching, and, for that reason, I like to avoid it whenever possible. In short notes, obviously in personal historical remarks, and perhaps, in essays such as this, it has its place.
You can download the pdf of Halmos' complete essay .
- 6 +1 for the Halmos quote. Your example ("we let...") is certainly a place where I wouldn't use a pronoun at all! – David Ketcheson Commented Aug 23, 2012 at 6:04
- 2 @scaaahu Without reading the specific example, I can't be sure, but... I would liken "We call something X" to saying "this is how it's done" descriptive of those in the know and prescriptive for those new to the area. – Dan C Commented Aug 23, 2012 at 6:57
- 19 I can see the value of Halmos' advice in the specific field of mathematics, where the entire content of a paper is composed of incontrovertible facts. However, in the natural sciences things are rarely so clear-cut, and in the end what most papers express are not facts but opinions. These are highly informed opinions based on evidence, but they are opinions nevertheless. In my view it's counterproductive and misleading to try and avoid any mention of whose opinions they are, so I think it's very appropriate to introduce such a paper with "I argue that...". – N. Virgo Commented Aug 26, 2012 at 10:28
- 22 Additionally, outside of mathematics you have to deal with descriptions of experiments. It's a question of style whether to say "a device was constructed", "we constructed a device", "I constructed a device". Personally, I find the first incredibly awkward (constructed by whom?), the second a bit jarring (wait, was there someone else involved?) and the third perfectly fine. – N. Virgo Commented Aug 26, 2012 at 10:32
- 6 I, for one, find the idea of using 'we' in a single-author essay to be utterly bizarre. Authors should take responsibility for their own work and leave the readers out of it. – Ubiquitous Commented May 12, 2015 at 15:06
Authorial "we" is quite common, even in single author papers (at least in math and related fields). The explanation I've heard is that it should be read as both the writer and the reader (as in "we now prove...", meaning that we two shall now prove it together). Some people find it awkward, and insist on "I", but this is unusual (and I've heard of referees demanding "we"). In cases where "we" is truly nonsensical (for instance, introducing a list of people being thanked), people who avoid "I" either find an alternate phrasing or refer to themselves in the third person ("The author would like to thank...").
In single-author papers, I think consistency trumps any particular rule or style. As the Haimos essay suggests, you can achieve whatever style you choose; you just need to make sure that it makes sense.
For instance, don't switch back and forth between "I" and "we," or between active and passive constructions too close to one another. Make the use of "I" and "we" clear to indicate active participation in the project (for instance, for assumptions or approximations made, you choose that—unless it's something everybody does).
![can you say we in a research paper aeismail's user avatar](https://i.sstatic.net/pEs0a.png?s=64)
- 21 I agree with "don't switch back and forth between 'I' and 'we'", but I disagree with your comparison of that with "[don't switch back and forth between] active and passive constructions". There are contexts where habitual use of I makes sense. I know of no analogous contexts for repeated use of passive constructions . As a general rule, writing extensively in the passive voice is just bad writing . – Dan C Commented Aug 23, 2012 at 15:20
- +1, "I" or "We", it's your call, but be consistent (and also use the present tense, but this is another story). – Sylvain Peyronnet Commented Aug 23, 2012 at 17:08
- The passive voice is useful for switching the emphasis. But what I meant was don't go "We modeled X. This was done to study Y. We will not look at Z further. Z was not modeled because A." and so on. – aeismail Commented Aug 23, 2012 at 20:15
- 2 "We modeled X to study Y. We did not model Z because A." – JeffE Commented Aug 24, 2012 at 12:53
- 7 @aeismail: I honestly can't find anything objectionable in your proposed counterexample! – Aant Commented Aug 26, 2012 at 23:49
When not faced with a journal/publisher specific style, my go to style guide is APA. I really like the APA style blog. In this post they explain:
If you’re writing a paper alone, use I as your pronoun. If you have coauthors, use we.
They go on to lash out against the editorial we
However, avoid using we to refer to broader sets of people—researchers, students, psychologists, Americans, people in general, or even all of humanity—without specifying who you mean (a practice called using the editorial “we”). This can introduce ambiguity into your writing.
There is also another related post about using we and avoiding ambiguity.
![can you say we in a research paper StrongBad's user avatar](https://i.sstatic.net/Khnp1.png?s=64)
- 3 The context is important, though. If you are writing a scientific/mathematical paper, writing "I" will come across as odd and unprofessional, so this would be pretty bad advice. – Rob Commented Sep 18, 2021 at 19:45
There are already two good answers for this entry, one is also accepted. But I'm going to give my two cent answer anyway...
This is what I learned from a workshop on writing scientific texts. Basically, my suggestion would be avoid using either "we" or "I" in the whole paper, except the "Experiment and results" section 1 . The idea is that by using passive form in the text, you avoid both issues related to being egotistical or ungrammatical.
Then in the "Experiment and results" you use "We" 2 . Why not using passive form in "Experiment" section? Well, you could but the idea here is that these results can be produced by everyone, including readers. So "we" is not referring to author(s), but to author(s) and readers. 1. This might not be the case in fields that papers do not have an experimental section. 2. Once could object that this will result in inconstancy in paper which is a valid objection.
- 1 Why the factually incorrect "we" in the experiments and results sections? This is nonsense. The "we" should be used iff it can refer to author and reader . – Walter Commented Jul 6, 2017 at 9:25
The " royal we " works
The " royal we " suggests a hypothetical population of peers who hold some position. This hypothetical population may-or-may-not include the reader, at the reader's option. And since it's a hypothetical population with a subjective number of members, " we " is appropriate.
Even if you're talking about a real-world action that you did to perform a specific experimental step, it's still accurate to describe the hypothetical population as having performed that action.
This approach has a few advantages:
It's easier for readers to put themselves into your shoes as a member of the population engaging in the study.
It avoids distracting the reader with inconsistent pronouns for the authors across papers.
![can you say we in a research paper Nat's user avatar](https://i.sstatic.net/J3dKX.png?s=64)
It's field-dependent. English teachers told me the following:
In STEM you use "we" for "the reader and the author(s)", regardless of how many authors you have. (Note that the "royal we" would be the wrong term, since the authors don't wish to sound as ostentatious in "we, the king of ...".)
In languages, you use "I" if you are the sole author.
- 2 That really is bad advice. "We studied X" does not mean that the reader studied it. – aeismail Commented Jan 6, 2018 at 22:57
- 11 @aeismail That really is a bad comment. In STEM, "we studied X" in the conclusion of a paper does mean that the reader studied X while reading the paper. In languages, "we" may mean sound pompous, may or may not involve the reader, or be completely misunderstood. – user85520 Commented Jan 6, 2018 at 23:43
- 1 And what does It mean in the introduction? It shouldn’t mean one thing in the introduction and another somewhere else. – aeismail Commented Jan 7, 2018 at 1:21
- 4 Sorry, "we" does not universally mean "reader and the author." There are too many usages where that definition simply doesn't work: "We added reagent X." "We measured the growth of species Y." "We observed that Y grew with temperature." The reader did none of those. – aeismail Commented Jan 7, 2018 at 2:14
- 4 It would be more accurate to say that in mathematics (and related areas like theoretical computer science), one uses "we" for "the author and the reader(s)". There is no such area as "STEM". – JeffE Commented Jan 7, 2018 at 4:27
You must log in to answer this question.
Not the answer you're looking for browse other questions tagged publications writing writing-style grammar ..
- Featured on Meta
- Bringing clarity to status tag usage on meta sites
- We've made changes to our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy - July 2024
- Announcing a change to the data-dump process
Hot Network Questions
- Passport Carry in Taiwan
- Is it advisable to contact faculty members at U.S. universities prior to submitting a PhD application?
- What is the significance of bringing the door to Nippur in the Epic of Gilgamesh?
- Fill a grid with numbers so that each row/column calculation yields the same number
- Purpose of burn permit?
- How to attach a 4x8 plywood to a air hockey table
- My colleagues and I are travelling to UK as delegates in an event and the company is paying for all our travel expenses. what documents are required
- How is yield calculated for a portfolio?
- Why an Out Parameter can be left unassigned in .NET 6 but not .NET 8 (CS0177)?
- How can you trust a forensic scientist to have maintained the chain of custody?
- How do I safely remove a mystery cast iron pipe in my basement?
- Are soldiers sinning when they kill enemy in a war?
- A horror-SF short story that begins as a "mundane" dialogue between two paranoid conspiracy theorists
- Why does the NIV have differing versions of Romans 3:22?
- What does it say in the inscriptions on Benjamin's doorway; A Canticle for Leibowitz
- How would you say a couple of letters (as in mail) if they're not necessarily letters?
- Does Vexing Bauble counter taxed 0 mana spells?
- Using "no" at the end of a statement instead of "isn't it"?
- Philosophies about how childhood beliefs influence / shape adult thoughts
- How do you determine what order to process chained events/interactions?
- Why does a halfing's racial trait lucky specify you must use the next roll?
- Why did General Leslie Groves evade Robert Oppenheimer's question here?
- How would increasing atomic bond strength affect nuclear physics?
- How Can this Limit be really Evaluated?
Get the Reddit app
This subreddit is for discussing academic life, and for asking questions directed towards people involved in academia, (both science and humanities).
Is it best to use "we" or "I" in the PhD thesis?
I am close to being finished with my PhD thesis, but i have been struggling with this issue lately.
My thesis is based on 4 manuscript of which there are multiple co-authors (with me being first author). In those, we use "we" to describe all our actions and thoughts. No problem.
In my PhD thesis, my supervisor is encouraging me to use "I" instead of "we" in the discussion/conclusion. This feels very unnatural to me as all the findings are based on the results that "we" found in the manuscripts.
This has led me to balance the use of we/I, where I use "I" whenever i describe something only I did (e.g. experiments). And "we" when referring to conclusions. However, i am a bit at loss about what to do.
Any seasoned academics that can offer some advice? (My supervisor is out of office, hence why i post the question here and not to my supervisor directly)
By continuing, you agree to our User Agreement and acknowledge that you understand the Privacy Policy .
Enter the 6-digit code from your authenticator app
You’ve set up two-factor authentication for this account.
Enter a 6-digit backup code
Create your username and password.
Reddit is anonymous, so your username is what you’ll go by here. Choose wisely—because once you get a name, you can’t change it.
![](http://rss3.fun/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
Reset your password
Enter your email address or username and we’ll send you a link to reset your password
Check your inbox
An email with a link to reset your password was sent to the email address associated with your account
Choose a Reddit account to continue
Have a language expert improve your writing
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
- Knowledge Base
- Academic writing
- Taboo words in academic writing
Words and Phrases to Avoid in Academic Writing
Published on February 6, 2016 by Sarah Vinz . Revised on September 11, 2023.
When you are writing a dissertation , thesis, or research paper, many words and phrases that are acceptable in conversations or informal writing are considered inappropriate in academic writing .
You should try to avoid expressions that are too informal, unsophisticated, vague, exaggerated, or subjective, as well as those that are generally unnecessary or incorrect.
Bear in mind, however, that these guidelines do not apply to text you are directly quoting from your sources (including interviews ).
Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text
Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes
![can you say we in a research paper upload-your-document-ai-proofreader](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/grammar-check.webp)
Table of contents
Too informal, too exaggerated, too subjective, generally incorrect, other interesting articles.
Academic writing is generally more formal than the writing we see in non-academic materials (including on websites). It is also more formal than the ways in which we normally speak. The following words and phrases are considered too informal for a dissertation or academic paper.
A bit | The interviews were difficult to schedule | The interviews were to schedule |
A lot of, a couple of | studies | studies |
Isn’t, can’t, doesn’t, would’ve (or any other ) | The sample | The sample |
Kind of, sort of | The findings were significant | The findings were |
Til, till | From 2008 2012 | From 2008 2012 |
You, your (i.e., the ) | can clearly see the results | can clearly see the results
|
Informal sentence starts
Some words are acceptable in certain contexts, but become too informal when used at the beginning of a sentence. You can replace these with appropriate transition words or simply remove them from the sentence.
Plus | the participants were in agreement on the third question | , the participants were in agreement on the third question |
So | it can be concluded that the model needs further refinement | it can be concluded that the model needs further refinement |
And | the participants were all over the age of 30 | The participants were all over the age of 30 |
we asked all the participants to sign an agreement | , we asked all the participants to sign an agreement |
Don't submit your assignments before you do this
The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students. Free citation check included.
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads//2019/12/before-editing.png)
Try for free
Using vague terms makes your writing imprecise and may cause people to interpret it in different ways. Always try to be as specific as possible.
Stuff | People are concerned about their | People are concerned about their |
Thing | The report presents many | The report presents many |
This topic has interested researchers for | This topic has interested researchers for |
Academic writing is usually unadorned and direct. Some adverbs of frequency (such as always and never ) and intensifiers (words that create emphasis, such as really ) are often too dramatic. They may also not be accurate – you’re making a significant claim when you say something is perfect or never happens.
These terms do sometimes add value, but try to use them sparingly.
Always, never | Researchers argue that | Researchers argue that |
Perfect | The solution to the problem | to the problem |
Really, so, super | This theory is important | This theory is |
Some words and phrases reveal your own bias. For instance, if you state that something will obviously happen, you are indicating that you think the occurrence is obvious – not stating a fact.
Expressing your opinion is appropriate in certain sections of a dissertation and in particular types of academic texts (such as personal statements and reflective or argumentative essays ). In most cases, though, take care when using words and phrases such as those below – try to let the facts speak for themselves, or emphasize your point with less biased language.
Beautiful, ugly, wonderful, horrible, great, boring | A review of the literature yielded many articles | A review of the literature yielded many articles |
Obviously, naturally, of course | The results indicate | The results indicate |
Certain words and phrases are often used incorrectly, even by native speakers of a language. If you’re exposed to such mistakes often enough, you may start to assume they are correct – but it’s important that you don’t let them creep into your writing.
You should also bear in mind that some of these mistakes relate to things we all frequently mishear (for instance, we often think the speaker is saying would of instead of would have ).
Literally | The students did not understand | The students did not understand |
Would of, had of | The study considered | The study considered |
In general, you should also try to avoid using words and phrases that fall into the following categories:
- Jargon (i.e., “insider” terminology that may be difficult for readers from other fields to understand)
- Clichés (i.e., expressions that are heavily overused, such as think outside of the box and at the end of the day )
- Everyday abbreviations (e.g., approx. , ASAP, corona, stats, info )
- Slang (e.g., cops , cool )
- Gender-biased language (e.g., firemen , mankind )
- Generally unnecessary (e.g., redundant expressions that do not add meaning, such as compete with each other instead of simply compete)
Reflective reports and personal statements sometimes have a less formal tone. In these types of writing, you may not have to follow these guidelines as strictly. The preface or acknowledgements of a dissertation also often have a less formal and more personal voice than the rest of the document.
If you want to know more about AI for academic writing, AI tools, or fallacies make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples or go directly to our tools!
- Ad hominem fallacy
- Post hoc fallacy
- Appeal to authority fallacy
- False cause fallacy
- Sunk cost fallacy
- Deep learning
- Generative AI
- Machine learning
- Reinforcement learning
- Supervised vs. unsupervised learning
(AI) Tools
- Grammar Checker
- Paraphrasing Tool
- Text Summarizer
- AI Detector
- Plagiarism Checker
- Citation Generator
Cite this Scribbr article
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
Vinz, S. (2023, September 11). Words and Phrases to Avoid in Academic Writing. Scribbr. Retrieved August 28, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/academic-writing/taboo-words/
Is this article helpful?
Sarah's academic background includes a Master of Arts in English, a Master of International Affairs degree, and a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science. She loves the challenge of finding the perfect formulation or wording and derives much satisfaction from helping students take their academic writing up a notch.
Other students also liked
Transition words & phrases | list & examples, list of 47 phrasal verbs and their one-word substitutions, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".
I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”
Can You Use "I" or "We" in Research Paper
Quick Navigation
What is a research paper?
Work on the research paper is one of the most important forms of the educational process. It is aimed primarily at practical training and is carried out in accordance with the curriculum.
In accordance with the Regulation on the organization of the educational process of higher educational institutions of almost all countries of the world, the research paper is carried out in order to consolidate, deepen and summarize the knowledge gained by students during the study, and their application to a comprehensive solution to a specific task.
New requirements for the quality of training specialists that meet the needs of the modern stage of scientific and technical and socio-economic development of the country, make the research work of students an important factor in improving the entire system of training specialists.
Students must constantly increase their knowledge, respond promptly to the demands of the progress of science and technology. In connection with this, the issues related to the functions of the research work of the students in higher education are of particular relevance, and the education of specialists must be organically linked with the enhancement of their creative potential.
There are many ways of starting the research paper . It can be a quote, a question, information from a blog or any other source, and right now, we’ll provide you with the information on whether you can start it with the story.
Can I use “I” in a research paper.
During writing a research paper, we are faced with many questions we need to find answers to. This article is devoted to giving you the best answers for questions: can I say “I” in a research paper, can you use I in a research paper MLA, can you say We in a research paper and can you use I or We in a research paper.
Let’s start from can you use “I” in a research paper.
- The answer for the question can a research paper use i is the next: the use of the first person varies considerably between disciplines – most common in the humanities, least common in the physical sciences, with social sciences coming, as you’d expect, in the middle. However, the only field, where no use of the first person in (admittedly small) sample wasn’t found was accountancy. Draw your own conclusions.
- Use of the first person was most common in the introductions of papers; e.g., “I shall argue that …” Interestingly, conclusions, where students love to write things like “in my opinion ….” or “I strongly believe …” were relatively free of first-person usage.
- Where phrases like “I think” and “in my opinion” are used, it is often used to make the opinion weaker, not stronger. “I think” means, “I think, but I’m not sure”; “in my opinion” means “this is only my opinion – it’s not the only conclusion you can draw.” (This contrasts with some kinds of business and technical writing, where your opinion is central).
To sum up, the answer for the question can I write I in a research paper is the next: use “I” carefully, bearing in mind your audience, the field in which you are writing and what you are doing in that particular part of the essay, and use “in my opinion” rarely, if at all.
Use “i” in the MLA research paper.
The answer to the question can I use “i” in the MLA research paper is the same as can you use I in a research paper. The general writing style of the research paper is slightly more formal than that of a regular essay. You should avoid all contractions like don’t or won’t; instead, write out the phrases do not and will not. Do not begin any sentences with, and, or, but; instead, use slightly more formal words like Also and However.
If your topic is something scientific or medical, be sure to explain and “break down” any technical words or medical terms. Re-define them in your own words so that the reader can easily understand them. Doing this will also help you to understand the terms by yourself.
Usually, you should try to “set up” the reader for a long story before typing it. In other words, tell the reader what the point of the story is supposed to be. What is the reader supposed to get out of the story? Why do you include it in your paper? What does the story show or prove?
Can I say “we”
There are many discussions about whether we can use I in research papers, as well as can you use “we” in a research paper. There is no clear answer to this question, as you can do both. It’s not prohibited in the rules of academic writing not to use first-person pronouns.
However, the use of “I” and “we” still has some generally accepted rules we ought to follow. For example, the first person is more likely used in the abstract, introduction, discussion, and conclusion sections of an academic paper while the third person and passive constructions are found in the methods and results sections.
It’s not easy to write a good research paper. We need to break the mountain of textbooks, periodical literature, read the works of eminent scientists. As a result, the original text should be obtained, with the same success based on both existing developments and new student ideas.
Also, students often look for information about a psychological research paper.
Check what your teacher thinks about that issue. Do not neglect the help of your instructor, he/she can suggest interesting directions, help to find the right literature. Consultations will allow you to write a qualitative, interesting, and unique research paper.
Can you use “i” or “we” in a research paper?
As far as you can see, the research paper is a journalistic work in which the author sets the task of analyzing an existing scientific problem or certain phenomena from the point of view, first of all, of the regularities lying on their basis. The research paper has a certain composition; its contents should be deployed in a definite sequence.
In particular, the author must first explain the relevance of choosing one or another problem, the degree of its elaboration in the scientific literature, and the practical activities of the industry; define the purpose of the publication, present your thoughts and substantiate them, summarize briefly.
You should decide, can I say “we” in a research paper or can you use the word “i” in a research paper, as in modern academic writing, both ways are popular. Your paperwork should contribute to the profound learning of the lecture course and the acquisition of skills in solving practical problems.
It requires from the student not only the knowledge of the general and special literature on the subject but also the ability to conduct economic, mathematical, expert and other research, to link theory with practice, to generalize, to formulate conclusions and suggestions on improving the efficiency of the service sector and international economic relationships.
Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free
It will be useful to read
It's possible to submit essay on time.
![can you say we in a research paper Wyzant](https://apps.wyzant.io/learnable/fora/logos/ask-an-expert-vertical-d778300cea72ebace78c006bb693af13cfb0e4495f0d64d36f977842f65d5871.png)
Is it recommended to use "we" in research papers?
1 expert answer.
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://dj1hlxw0wr920.cloudfront.net/userfiles/wyzfiles/36f18d52-cd25-41d7-ae88-906255d3e2b0.jpg)
Megan H. answered 03/22/19
Professional, Energetic Writing Teacher with 9 Years of Experience
Generally speaking, it is frowned upon to use any first- or second-person pronouns in academic writing (i.e. I, me, my, myself, you, your, yours, yourself, we, us, our, ourselves). That's because in truly scientific writing, your personal identity should play no role in the validity or framing of your research and reporting.
Still looking for help? Get the right answer, fast.
Get a free answer to a quick problem. Most questions answered within 4 hours.
Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.
RELATED TOPICS
Related questions, can i end a sentence with a preposition.
Answers · 40
When do I use which or that in a sentence?
Answers · 18
Is there any proof that Shakespeare wrote his plays?
Answers · 17
Is it wrong to write in passive voice?
Answers · 46
How do I know when to use affect vs effect?
Answers · 38
RECOMMENDED TUTORS
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://dj1hlxw0wr920.cloudfront.net/userfiles/wyzfiles/a74282cd-f3d0-4e22-b2aa-39f836ae915f.jpg)
find an online tutor
- Language Arts tutors
- Grammar tutors
- Speech tutors
- English tutors
- SAT Writing tutors
- ACT English tutors
- Linguistics tutors
related lessons
- Need help with something else? Try one of our lessons.
- Need help with something else? Try searching for a tutor.
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://cdn.wordvice.ai/images/2023-08/sidebar-arrow.png)
50 Useful Academic Words & Phrases for Research
Like all good writing, writing an academic paper takes a certain level of skill to express your ideas and arguments in a way that is natural and that meets a level of academic sophistication. The terms, expressions, and phrases you use in your research paper must be of an appropriate level to be submitted to academic journals.
Therefore, authors need to know which verbs , nouns , and phrases to apply to create a paper that is not only easy to understand, but which conveys an understanding of academic conventions. Using the correct terminology and usage shows journal editors and fellow researchers that you are a competent writer and thinker, while using non-academic language might make them question your writing ability, as well as your critical reasoning skills.
What are academic words and phrases?
One way to understand what constitutes good academic writing is to read a lot of published research to find patterns of usage in different contexts. However, it may take an author countless hours of reading and might not be the most helpful advice when faced with an upcoming deadline on a manuscript draft.
Briefly, “academic” language includes terms, phrases, expressions, transitions, and sometimes symbols and abbreviations that help the pieces of an academic text fit together. When writing an academic text–whether it is a book report, annotated bibliography, research paper, research poster, lab report, research proposal, thesis, or manuscript for publication–authors must follow academic writing conventions. You can often find handy academic writing tips and guidelines by consulting the style manual of the text you are writing (i.e., APA Style , MLA Style , or Chicago Style ).
However, sometimes it can be helpful to have a list of academic words and expressions like the ones in this article to use as a “cheat sheet” for substituting the better term in a given context.
How to Choose the Best Academic Terms
You can think of writing “academically” as writing in a way that conveys one’s meaning effectively but concisely. For instance, while the term “take a look at” is a perfectly fine way to express an action in everyday English, a term like “analyze” would certainly be more suitable in most academic contexts. It takes up fewer words on the page and is used much more often in published academic papers.
You can use one handy guideline when choosing the most academic term: When faced with a choice between two different terms, use the Latinate version of the term. Here is a brief list of common verbs versus their academic counterparts:
) | |
add up | calculate |
carry out | execute |
find out | discover |
pass out | distribute |
ask questions about | interrogate |
make sense of | interpret |
pass on | distribute |
Although this can be a useful tip to help academic authors, it can be difficult to memorize dozens of Latinate verbs. Using an AI paraphrasing tool or proofreading tool can help you instantly find more appropriate academic terms, so consider using such revision tools while you draft to improve your writing.
Top 50 Words and Phrases for Different Sections in a Research Paper
The “Latinate verb rule” is just one tool in your arsenal of academic writing, and there are many more out there. But to make the process of finding academic language a bit easier for you, we have compiled a list of 50 vital academic words and phrases, divided into specific categories and use cases, each with an explanation and contextual example.
Best Words and Phrases to use in an Introduction section
1. historically.
An adverb used to indicate a time perspective, especially when describing the background of a given topic.
2. In recent years
A temporal marker emphasizing recent developments, often used at the very beginning of your Introduction section.
3. It is widely acknowledged that
A “form phrase” indicating a broad consensus among researchers and/or the general public. Often used in the literature review section to build upon a foundation of established scientific knowledge.
4. There has been growing interest in
Highlights increasing attention to a topic and tells the reader why your study might be important to this field of research.
5. Preliminary observations indicate
Shares early insights or findings while hedging on making any definitive conclusions. Modal verbs like may , might , and could are often used with this expression.
6. This study aims to
Describes the goal of the research and is a form phrase very often used in the research objective or even the hypothesis of a research paper .
7. Despite its significance
Highlights the importance of a matter that might be overlooked. It is also frequently used in the rationale of the study section to show how your study’s aim and scope build on previous studies.
8. While numerous studies have focused on
Indicates the existing body of work on a topic while pointing to the shortcomings of certain aspects of that research. Helps focus the reader on the question, “What is missing from our knowledge of this topic?” This is often used alongside the statement of the problem in research papers.
9. The purpose of this research is
A form phrase that directly states the aim of the study.
10. The question arises (about/whether)
Poses a query or research problem statement for the reader to acknowledge.
Best Words and Phrases for Clarifying Information
11. in other words.
Introduces a synopsis or the rephrasing of a statement for clarity. This is often used in the Discussion section statement to explain the implications of the study .
12. That is to say
Provides clarification, similar to “in other words.”
13. To put it simply
Simplifies a complex idea, often for a more general readership.
14. To clarify
Specifically indicates to the reader a direct elaboration of a previous point.
15. More specifically
Narrows down a general statement from a broader one. Often used in the Discussion section to clarify the meaning of a specific result.
16. To elaborate
Expands on a point made previously.
17. In detail
Indicates a deeper dive into information.
Points out specifics. Similar meaning to “specifically” or “especially.”
19. This means that
Explains implications and/or interprets the meaning of the Results section .
20. Moreover
Expands a prior point to a broader one that shows the greater context or wider argument.
Best Words and Phrases for Giving Examples
21. for instance.
Provides a specific case that fits into the point being made.
22. As an illustration
Demonstrates a point in full or in part.
23. To illustrate
Shows a clear picture of the point being made.
24. For example
Presents a particular instance. Same meaning as “for instance.”
25. Such as
Lists specifics that comprise a broader category or assertion being made.
26. Including
Offers examples as part of a larger list.
27. Notably
Adverb highlighting an important example. Similar meaning to “especially.”
28. Especially
Adverb that emphasizes a significant instance.
29. In particular
Draws attention to a specific point.
30. To name a few
Indicates examples than previously mentioned are about to be named.
Best Words and Phrases for Comparing and Contrasting
31. however.
Introduces a contrasting idea.
32. On the other hand
Highlights an alternative view or fact.
33. Conversely
Indicates an opposing or reversed idea to the one just mentioned.
34. Similarly
Shows likeness or parallels between two ideas, objects, or situations.
35. Likewise
Indicates agreement with a previous point.
36. In contrast
Draws a distinction between two points.
37. Nevertheless
Introduces a contrasting point, despite what has been said.
38. Whereas
Compares two distinct entities or ideas.
Indicates a contrast between two points.
Signals an unexpected contrast.
Best Words and Phrases to use in a Conclusion section
41. in conclusion.
Signifies the beginning of the closing argument.
42. To sum up
Offers a brief summary.
43. In summary
Signals a concise recap.
44. Ultimately
Reflects the final or main point.
45. Overall
Gives a general concluding statement.
Indicates a resulting conclusion.
Demonstrates a logical conclusion.
48. Therefore
Connects a cause and its effect.
49. It can be concluded that
Clearly states a conclusion derived from the data.
50. Taking everything into consideration
Reflects on all the discussed points before concluding.
Edit Your Research Terms and Phrases Before Submission
Using these phrases in the proper places in your research papers can enhance the clarity, flow, and persuasiveness of your writing, especially in the Introduction section and Discussion section, which together make up the majority of your paper’s text in most academic domains.
However, it's vital to ensure each phrase is contextually appropriate to avoid redundancy or misinterpretation. As mentioned at the top of this article, the best way to do this is to 1) use an AI text editor , free AI paraphrase tool or AI proofreading tool while you draft to enhance your writing, and 2) consult a professional proofreading service like Wordvice, which has human editors well versed in the terminology and conventions of the specific subject area of your academic documents.
For more detailed information on using AI tools to write a research paper and the best AI tools for research , check out the Wordvice AI Blog .
Main navigation
- Our Articles
- Dr. Joe's Books
- Media and Press
- Our History
- Public Lectures
- Past Newsletters
- Photo Gallery: The McGill OSS Separates 25 Years of Separating Sense from Nonsense
Subscribe to the OSS Weekly Newsletter!
Register for the trottier 2024 symposium, if it sounds too good to be true, it is.
![can you say we in a research paper phone home screen with social media apps](https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/files/oss/styles/hd/public/social-media-6557345_1280.jpeg?itok=Dj78rd2u×tamp=1724873832)
- Add to calendar
- Tweet Widget
There is hardly a week that passes without someone asking my opinion about some video purporting to have found a remedy for some terrible ailment that “Big Pharma doesn’t want you to know about.” Why? Because as we are told, these companies are more interested in selling expensive, ineffective treatments to make sure that profits keep rolling in, profits that would be lost if a cure were made available.
Numerous such videos follow a standard formula. They start with a heart wrenching story about an unfortunate person who has been struck by some devastating disease that has a poor prognosis. But to the rescue comes a distraught family member who dedicates himself to finding a cure by “doing his own research.” Delving through scientific papers he discovers some cutting-edge work by a scientist that for some usually nefarious reason has not been embraced by the medical community despite “evidence” that it works. Our hero tries it on the afflicted family member who is miraculously cured. His compassion for humanity then finds a way to make the discovery available to everyone. All that a poor afflicted soul requires to benefit from the wonders of the treatment is a credit card.
How are customers induced to fork over their credit card? That’s where the slickly produced video comes in. After describing how a friend or relative was miraculously cured, the altruistic narrator promises to reveal the secret that “has left doctors shaking their heads in disbelief.” The big reveal is to come in the next three minutes, he proclaims, but that doesn’t happen. The viewer, enticed by claims of studies at “leading universities,” has to sit through some 45 minutes of seductive blather about how thousands of patients have already had their health restored. It is all thanks to this good Samaritan having discovered the secret that the world’s experts have missed, save for the one gallant scientist who put him on the right track.
The torturous video finally does reveal the secret, which, surprise, surprise, is a dietary supplement. Needless to say, it is composed of all natural ingredients and is reassuringly free of gluten, GMOs, and of course, chemicals. If all these ingredients were individually bought, we are told, the cost would be hundreds of dollars! But now, a benevolent company, only interested in saving people’s health from its inevitable downward spiral, has managed to produce a pill with a combination of these magical ingredients at a fraction of that price. But there is no time to waste! Purchase must be made quickly because this rock-bottom price cannot be guaranteed for long. Today is the time, because the video may soon be taken down as greedy pharmaceutical companies mount an attack.
The only difference between these videos is the disease being “cured” and the supplements that are needed to do it. A recent one brought to my attention is all about “MemoSurge,” guaranteed to reverse memory loss. The heart wrenching story tells of a grandmother who forgets that her grandchild is out in the freezing cold and almost dies. Her husband fears that this is the beginning of a downward slide towards dementia. He takes out a line of credit and sells some property so he can quit his job and devote himself to finding a cure so his wife doesn’t end up in a confused state in a nursing home, which he says may be the destiny of many who are watching the video.
In his search, he stumbles upon the cutting-edge, ground-breaking work of a Dr. John Wendt, a scientist whom Google fails to locate. He has discovered wondrous chemicals that can reverse brain aging and restore lost memories. The formula consists of some dozen ingredients that include phosphatidyl serine, St. John’s Wort, N-acetyl carnitine and bacopa monnieri, all of which have been the subject of memory research, none of which is secret. And none of which is compelling. The references that are provided do indeed deal with these substances but do not back up the spectacular claims. No studies have examined this particular combination of ingredients and their doses as found in MemoSurge. It is dishonest to promote a product that claims to have such stunning benefits without any evidence from clinical trials that have used this specific product.
If there were a significant breakthrough in preventing age-related loss of brain function, such as Alzheimer’s disease, which the video does not name but clearly describes as being the cause of the unfortunate grandmother’s problems, we would not hear about it in this fashion. It would be documented with appropriate evidence from clinical trials in leading journals such as Nature, Science or the New England Journal of Medicine. My advice is to not waste the hour that you will never get back watching such videos. As soon as you recognize the formula, which quickly becomes evident, just click off.
@JoeSchwarcz
What to read next
Claims about ozone therapy don't pass the smell test 23 aug 2024.
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/files/oss/styles/large/public/pexels-jackbulmer-16711779.jpeg?itok=PKaJBAhF)
Is Genghis Khan Hiding Inside Your DNA? 23 Aug 2024
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/files/oss/styles/large/public/genghis_khan_statue.jpeg?itok=wgYGAe0V)
Waxing Lyrical About Fruit Wax 21 Aug 2024
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/files/oss/styles/large/public/13fa15cc-7eb2-44d7-a625-fd2def07b351_1_201_a.jpeg?itok=5QfSv__A)
Water Cures Have Flowed Through History 16 Aug 2024
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/files/oss/styles/large/public/article_cover_photos_-_hosna_haleh_960_x_420_px_3.png?itok=7njGdlex)
The Book Natural Healers Really Hate 16 Aug 2024
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/files/oss/styles/large/public/article_cover_photos_-_hosna_haleh_960_x_420_px_2.png?itok=BzMzGOSF)
How a Crazy Claim About a 'Bottle Jumper' Led to a Riot 9 Aug 2024
![can you say we in a research paper can you say we in a research paper](https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/files/oss/styles/large/public/pexels-kelly-1179532-4570692_2.jpg?itok=VEnZIM0U)
Department and University Information
Office for science and society.
![can you say we in a research paper Office for Science and Society](https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/files/oss/moriarty_branding_img.png)
Online Students
For All Online Programs
International Students
On Campus, need or have Visa
Campus Students
For All Campus Programs
Academic Referencing: How to Cite a Research Paper
Learning how to conduct accurate, discipline-specific academic research can feel daunting at first. But, with a solid understanding of the reasoning behind why we use academic citations coupled with knowledge of the basics, you’ll learn how to cite sources with accuracy and confidence.
When it comes to academic research, citing sources correctly is arguably as important as the research itself. "Your instructors are expecting your work to adhere to these professional standards," said Amanda Girard , research support manager of Shapiro Library at Southern New Hampshire University (SNHU).
With Shapiro Library for the past three years, Girard manages the library’s research support services, which includes SNHU’s 24/7 library chat and email support. She holds an undergraduate degree in professional writing and a graduate degree in library and information science. She said that accurate citations show that you have done your research on a topic and are knowledgeable about current ideas from those actively working in the field.
In other words, when you cite sources according to the academic style of your discipline, you’re giving credit where credit is due.
Why Cite Sources?
Citing sources properly ensures you’re following high academic and professional standards for integrity and ethics.
“When you cite a source, you can ethically use others’ research. If you are not adequately citing the information you claim in your work, it would be considered plagiarism ,” said Shannon Geary '16 , peer tutor at SNHU.
Geary has an undergraduate degree in communication from SNHU and has served on the academic support team for close to 2 years. Her job includes helping students learn how to conduct research and write academically.
“In academic writing, it is crucial to state where you are receiving your information from,” she said. “Citing your sources ensures that you are following academic integrity standards.”
According to Geary and Girard, several key reasons for citing sources are:
- Access. Citing sources points readers to original sources. If anyone wants to read more on your topic, they can use your citations as a roadmap to access the original sources.
- Attribution. Crediting the original authors, researchers and experts shows that you’re knowledgeable about current ideas from those actively working in the field and adhering to high ethical standards, said Girard.
- Clarity. “By citing your sources correctly, your reader can follow along with your research,” Girard said.
- Consistency. Adhering to a citation style provides a framework for presenting ideas within similar academic fields. “Consistent formatting makes accessing, understanding and evaluating an author's findings easier for others in related fields of study,” Geary said.
- Credibility. Proper citation not only builds a writer's authority but also ensures the reliability of the work, according to Geary.
Ultimately, citing sources is a formalized way for you to share ideas as part of a bigger conversation among others in your field. It’s a way to build off of and reference one another’s ideas, Girard said.
How Do You Cite an Academic Research Paper?
Any time you use an original quote or paraphrase someone else’s ideas, you need to cite that material, according to Geary.
“The only time we do not need to cite is when presenting an original thought or general knowledge,” she said.
While the specific format for citing sources can vary based on the style used, several key elements are always included, according to Girard. Those are:
- Title of source
- Type of source, such as a journal, book, website or periodical
By giving credit to the authors, researchers and experts you cite, you’re building credibility. You’re showing that your argument is built on solid research.
“Proper citation not only builds a writer's authority but also ensures the reliability of the work,” Geary said. “Properly formatted citations are a roadmap for instructors and other readers to verify the information we present in our work.”
Common Citation Styles in Academic Research
Certain disciplines adhere to specific citation standards because different disciplines prioritize certain information and research styles . The most common citation styles used in academic research, according to Geary, are:
- American Psychological Association, known as APA . This style is standard in the social sciences such as psychology, education and communication. “In these fields, research happens rapidly, which makes it exceptionally important to use current research,” Geary said.
- Modern Language Association, known as MLA . This style is typically used in literature and humanities because of the emphasis on literature analysis. “When citing in MLA, there is an emphasis on the author and page number, allowing the audience to locate the original text that is being analyzed easily,” Geary said.
- Chicago Manual of Style, known as Chicago . This style is typically used in history, business and sometimes humanities. “(Chicago) offers flexibility because of the use of footnotes, which can be seen as less distracting than an in-text citation,” Geary said.
The benefit of using the same format as other researchers within a discipline is that the framework of presenting ideas allows you to “speak the same language,” according to Girard.
![can you say we in a research paper APA Citation for College: A Brief Overview](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ENvXORyKdlg/sddefault.jpg)
APA Citation for College: A Brief Overview
Are you writing a paper that needs to use APA citation, but don’t know what that means? No worries. You’ve come to the right place.
![can you say we in a research paper How to Use MLA Formatting: A Brief Overview](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/XpmXT5Jdlaw/sddefault.jpg)
How to Use MLA Formatting: A Brief Overview
Are you writing a paper for which you need to know how to use MLA formatting, but don’t know what that means? No worries. You’ve come to the right place.
How to Ensure Proper Citations
Keeping track of your research as you go is one of the best ways to ensure you’re citing appropriately and correctly based on the style that your academic discipline uses.
“Through careful citation, authors ensure their audience can distinguish between borrowed material and original thoughts, safeguarding their academic reputation and following academic honesty policies,” Geary said.
Some tips that she and Girard shared to ensure you’re citing sources correctly include:
- Keep track of sources as you work. Writers should keep track of their sources every time an idea is not theirs, according to Geary. “You don’t want to find the perfect research study and misplace its source information, meaning you’d have to omit it from your paper,” she said.
- Practice. Even experienced writers need to check their citations before submitting their work. “Citing requires us to pay close attention to detail, so always start your citation process early and go slow to ensure you don’t make mistakes,” said Geary. In time, citing sources properly becomes faster and easier.
- Use an Online Tool . Geary recommends the Shapiro Library citation guide . You can find sample papers, examples of how to cite in the different academic styles and up-to-date citation requirements, along with information and examples for APA, MLA and Chicago style citations.
- Work with a Tutor. A tutor can offer support along with tips to help you learn the process of academic research. Students at SNHU can connect with free peer tutoring through the Academic Support tab in their online courses, though many colleges and universities offer peer tutoring.
Find Your Program
How to cite a reference in academic writing.
A citation consists of two pieces: an in-text citation that is typically short and a longer list of references or works cited (depending on the style used) at the end of the paper.
“In-text citations immediately acknowledge the use of external source information and its exact location,” Geary said. While each style uses a slightly different format for in-text citations that reference the research, you may expect to need the page number, author’s name and possibly date of publication in parentheses at the end of a sentence or passage, according to Geary.
A longer entry listing the complete details of the resource you referenced should also be included on the references or works cited page at the end of the paper. The full citation is provided with complete details of the source, such as author, title, publication date and more, Geary said.
The two-part aspect of citations is because of readability. “You can imagine how putting the full citation would break up the flow of a paper,” Girard said. “So, a shortened version is used (in the text).”
“For example, if an in-text citation reads (Jones, 2024), the reader immediately knows that the ideas presented are coming from Jones’s work, and they can explore the comprehensive citation on the final page,” she said.
The in-text citation and full citation together provide a transparent trail of the author's process of engaging with research.
“Their combined use also facilitates further research by following a standardized style (APA, MLA, Chicago), guaranteeing that other scholars can easily connect and build upon their work in the future,” Geary said.
Developing and demonstrating your research skills, enhancing your work’s credibility and engaging ethically with the intellectual contributions of others are at the core of the citation process no matter which style you use.
A degree can change your life. Choose your program from 200+ SNHU degrees that can take you where you want to go.
A former higher education administrator, Dr. Marie Morganelli is a career educator and writer. She has taught and tutored composition, literature, and writing at all levels from middle school through graduate school. With two graduate degrees in English language and literature, her focus — whether teaching or writing — is in helping to raise the voices of others through the power of storytelling. Connect with her on LinkedIn .
Explore more content like this article
What is Considered Plagiarism And How to Avoid It
Degrees vs. Certificate Programs: What's the Difference?
How Many Credits Do You Need to Graduate College?
About southern new hampshire university.
SNHU is a nonprofit, accredited university with a mission to make high-quality education more accessible and affordable for everyone.
Founded in 1932, and online since 1995, we’ve helped countless students reach their goals with flexible, career-focused programs . Our 300-acre campus in Manchester, NH is home to over 3,000 students, and we serve over 135,000 students online. Visit our about SNHU page to learn more about our mission, accreditations, leadership team, national recognitions and awards.
![can you say we in a research paper A boy lying down using an asthma puffer.](https://images.theconversation.com/files/613954/original/file-20240816-17-uavxyt.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&rect=0%2C0%2C5884%2C3978&q=20&auto=format&w=320&fit=clip&dpr=2&usm=12&cs=strip)
RSV is linked to asthma in children – but we can’t say one causes the other yet
![can you say we in a research paper](https://cdn.theconversation.com/avatars/1452441/width170/jane-tuckerman.jpg)
Senior Research Officer, Murdoch Children's Research Institute
![can you say we in a research paper](https://cdn.theconversation.com/avatars/1455923/width170/danielle-wurzel.jpg)
Paediatric Respiratory Physician, and Honorary Fellow Manager, Murdoch Children's Research Institute
Disclosure statement
Jane Tuckerman has previously received funding from GlaxoSmithKline (investigator-led research). Funding has been directed to her research institution. There are no conflicts relevant to this article.
Danielle Wurzel has previously received funding from Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD) (consultancy fees), Praxhub (webinar presenter) and GlaxoSmithKline (investigator-led research). Funding has been directed to her research fund. There are no conflicts relevant to this article.
View all partners
As winter rolls on in Australia, respiratory viruses are everywhere. One of the main culprits is respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV, which has caused more than 145,000 infections around the country so far this year. Most are in children under five.
RSV is the leading cause of bronchiolitis and pneumonia (both chest infections) in young children. Each year, at least one in 200 children under five are hospitalised with RSV in Australia. Babies under six months , and especially under three months, are at highest risk.
RSV infects the airways and lungs , making airway mucus very sticky. Young babies may develop cough, wheeze, difficulty breathing and poor feeding.
Research indicates severe RSV infection in infancy may also increase the risk of children developing asthma. So, what is the evidence linking RSV with asthma? And why might this association exist?
Association or causation?
Asthma is a chronic lung condition which affects 11% of Australians . People with asthma often have difficulty breathing, and experience coughing and wheezing. This is due to their airways becoming narrower temporarily, usually because of triggers (for example, viral infections, dust or pollen). Asthma often starts as wheezing at preschool age. But in some people, it starts in adulthood.
When we talk about RSV and asthma it’s important to consider the differences between association and causation. An association exists when two events commonly occur together (for example, smoking and drinking coffee), whereas causation is when we know one can cause the other (for example, smoking and lung cancer). While the association between RSV and asthma is well established, causation has not yet been proven .
To prove causation, certain criteria must be met. These include a temporal relationship (in this case, RSV infection needs to come before asthma) and a plausible explanation (biological mechanism).
![can you say we in a research paper A baby in a hospital crib.](https://images.theconversation.com/files/613955/original/file-20240816-17-nnp9id.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&q=45&auto=format&w=754&fit=clip)
Some evidence suggests RSV infections alter the developing airway cells of infants and young children. This can mean the protective or barrier function of the airway lining is altered, predisposing the child to allergen sensitisation – where their immune system produces an antibody to something they encounter, such as grass or dust.
Allergen sensitisation is a significant risk factor for asthma, so severe RSV infection may contribute to the development of asthma through sensitisation to common environmental allergens. This represents a possible biological mechanism, but we still need more research to confirm this.
Several studies show an association between severe RSV and recurrent wheezing and asthma later in childhood.
But which comes first? In one study , children aged under 12 months who developed RSV bronchiolitis were followed for six years. Almost half (48%) were diagnosed with asthma before their seventh birthday.
Similarly, in another study , children hospitalised with RSV infection before turning two were more likely to develop asthma by age 18 than those not hospitalised.
In contrast, researchers who carried out a twin study concluded the data more likely pointed to reverse causation. That is, it was the children with a predisposition to asthma who were more likely to develop RSV requiring hospitalisation.
![can you say we in a research paper A father helps a small smiling boy to breathe through a nebuliser.](https://images.theconversation.com/files/613956/original/file-20240816-17-zdthar.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&q=45&auto=format&w=754&fit=clip)
We could be getting closer to an answer
The pendulum may be swinging towards causation. Recent findings from a South African birth cohort study showed severe RSV infections were associated with both recurrent wheeze and later impairment in lung function.
An earlier study by this group showed that hospitalisation for any respiratory infection, but especially for RSV, was associated with recurrent respiratory infections and wheezing. Recurrent wheezing and reduced lung function are predictors of future asthma.
Another recent study of more than 1,700 children in the United States showed avoiding RSV infection during infancy could prevent up to 15% of childhood asthma.
The recent availability of maternal vaccination and monoclonal antibodies to prevent RSV will likely help answer this question once and for all.
Earlier this year, nirsevimab (a long-acting monoclonal antibody) was made available to infants and young children through state-based programs in Western Australia , Queensland and New South Wales . Nirsevimab works a bit differently to a vaccine, but is similarly given as an injection.
Additionally, the RSV vaccine Abrysvo has this year been registered in Australia for use during pregnancy, to protect the baby once it’s born. It’s available for pregnant women to buy privately with a prescription from their doctor, while South Australia recently announced it would provide Abrysvo to pregnant women for free next year.
With these measures, hopefully in the years to come we’ll see a population-level reduction in RSV. If at the same time we see a reduction in asthma, this could finally answer the question of causation.
![can you say we in a research paper A nurse talks to a pregnant woman.](https://images.theconversation.com/files/613958/original/file-20240816-17-7a9n63.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&q=45&auto=format&w=754&fit=clip)
Protecting kids and communities
While the jury may still be out on whether RSV causes asthma, RSV and other viral infections can particularly be a problem for people who have asthma already. For both adults and children with asthma, viral respiratory illnesses can be more severe and trigger a flare-up of their asthma symptoms.
RSV is spread via coughing, sneezing and close contact. And there are many other viruses that spread in similar ways. Parents can help keep their kids and others healthy by encouraging children to cover their mouths and noses when coughing or sneezing, and regularly wash their hands.
Ensuring kids stay away from school, childcare or other children when sick helps prevent the spread of many viruses, including RSV. Finally, staying up to date with vaccinations and receiving the flu vaccine annually can make a big difference to our health and to those around us.
- Child health
- Winter health
- Kids health
- Respiratory infections
- Health analysis
![can you say we in a research paper](https://jobs.theconversation.com/uploads/job/logo/339672601/logo-1520549009.png)
Manager, Regional Training Hub
![can you say we in a research paper](https://jobs.theconversation.com/uploads/job/logo/339126549/NDRP-logo-with-words.png)
Head of Evidence to Action
![can you say we in a research paper](https://jobs.theconversation.com/uploads/job/logo/339092569/TRU_Logo_Left_RGB-colour_1_37476.png)
Supply Chain - Assistant/Associate Professor (Tenure-Track)
![can you say we in a research paper](https://jobs.theconversation.com/uploads/job/logo/338819618/SUT_Logo.jpg)
OzGrav Postdoctoral Research Fellow
![can you say we in a research paper](https://jobs.theconversation.com/uploads/job/logo/338310411/UNSWlogo.png)
Casual Facilitator: GERRIC Student Programs - Arts, Design and Architecture
![](http://rss3.fun/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
IMAGES
COMMENTS
We is used in papers with multiple authors. Even in papers having only one author/researcher, we is used to draw the reader into the discussion at hand. Moreover, there are several ways to avoid using the passive voice in the absence of we.On the one hand, there are many instances where the passive voice cannot be avoided, while, on the other, we can also be overused to the point of irritation.
Learn when and how to use first-person pronouns in your research paper. Find out the benefits, drawbacks, and guidelines for writing in the first person effectively.
However, "I" and "we" still have some generally accepted pronoun rules writers should follow. For example, the first person is more likely used in the abstract, Introduction section, Discussion section, and Conclusion section of an academic paper while the third person and passive constructions are found in the Methods section and ...
Discover the 10 best productivity books to boost efficiency, build good habits, master time management, and achieve your goals with proven strategies. Listen to research papers, anywhere. Explore "we" in research papers: guidelines, alternatives, and considerations for effective academic writing.
I have seen academic papers by a single author using I.However I agree with FumbleFingers that most of the time you would use we, and that I sounds strange in an academic paper. Personally, if I were to read your thesis and saw we, I wouldn't find it as an implication that you were not the only author of the work.Also, I assume you will have a thesis supervisor, who is also responsible to ...
Use first-person pronouns in APA Style to describe your work as well as your personal reactions. If you are writing a paper by yourself, use the pronoun "I" to refer to yourself. If you are writing a paper with coauthors, use the pronoun "we" to refer yourself and your coauthors together.
Learn why it is not wrong to use we in your paper to refer to you and your co-authors. Find out when and how to use first-person pronouns in scientific writing and how they can improve your clarity and persuasiveness.
Total: 1) Writing in the first, second, or third person is referred to as the author's point of view. When we write, our tendency is to personalize the text by writing in the first person. That is, we use pronouns such as "I" and "we". This is acceptable when writing personal information, a journal, or a book.
If you want a general guideline (if none is obviously imposed): If you describe experiments, derivations and similar of your own, use we. In the abstract or introduction of a review paper or something similar, you can use we. If you are doing neither, avoid using we except in the acknowledgements. Share.
In most academic writing, first-person pronouns should be avoided. For instance, when writing a research project, words such as "I," "we," "my," or "our" should probably not be used. The same principle applies to lab reports, research papers, literature reviews, and rhetorical analyses, among many other academic writing genres.
Learn when and how to use I or we in an APA Style paper, especially in personal response or reaction papers. Avoid ambiguity and confusion by specifying the referent of we and using plain language.
The study included 56 participants. For each sentence, identify the key verb. You are off track because you have focused on conducted as the key verb. Maybe you can aso avoid mentioning a person if you make the subject the study or the paper. -
According to this well-received answer on Academia, you can view use of "we" as an editorial "we" or "we, as in the author and the readers". ... If you are the only one behind the research and the writing behind the paper, I is a singular term and should therefore should be used instead of we. There is no "we" behind the paper if there was only ...
Maintaining a formal voice while writing academic essays and papers is essential to sound objective. One of the main rules of academic or formal writing is to avoid first-person pronouns like "we," "you," and "I.". These words pull focus away from the topic and shift it to the speaker - the opposite of your goal.
In scientific papers (in case of multiple authors), we usually use 'we' to address all authors such as "we performed the experiment…". I understand that the PhD thesis is basically the ...
Learn when to use first person pronouns ("I", "we", etc.) and personal experience in academic writing. Find out how to decide whether "I" will help your style, clarity, and positioning, and how to follow the conventions of different fields.
Use "we" if you mean "the reader and I", or if you are writing a co-authored paper. Don't use "we" if you only mean yourself. Not only does it seems logical that you would use the same approach when presenting a thesis as when writing it, but it would also be very odd to present something orally in the passive voice. At the very ...
132. Very rarely is 'I' used in scholarly writing (at least in math and the sciences). A much more common choice is 'we', as in "the author and the reader". For example: "We examine the case when..." One exception to this rule is if you're writing a memoir or some other sort of "personal piece" for which the identity of the author is ...
Neither "we" nor "I" should be used. The writer of the dissertation should avoid referencing himself or herself, and if necessary should use references like "the author" or "the research team." This rule is totally ignored, as in many cases something even remotely intelligible is sometimes too much of an ask.
Learn which words and phrases to avoid in your dissertation, thesis, or research paper. Find out why "we" is too informal and how to use alternatives.
Learn the rules and tips for using first-person pronouns in research papers. Find out when and how to use "I" or "we" in different sections and disciplines of academic writing.
Generally speaking, it is frowned upon to use any first- or second-person pronouns in academic writing (i.e. I, me, my, myself, you, your, yours, yourself, we, us, our, ourselves). That's because in truly scientific writing, your personal identity should play no role in the validity or framing of your research and reporting. Upvote • 1 Downvote.
Provides clarification, similar to "in other words.". Example The reaction is exothermic; that is to say, it releases heat. 13. To put it simply. Simplifies a complex idea, often for a more general readership. Example The universe is vast; to put it simply, it is larger than anything we can truly imagine. 14.
The torturous video finally does reveal the secret, which, surprise, surprise, is a dietary supplement. Needless to say, it is composed of all natural ingredients and is reassuringly free of gluten, GMOs, and of course, chemicals. If all these ingredients were individually bought, we are told, the cost would be hundreds of dollars!
"When you cite a source, you can ethically use others' research. If you are not adequately citing the information you claim in your work, it would be considered plagiarism," said Shannon Geary '16, peer tutor at SNHU. Geary has an undergraduate degree in communication from SNHU and has served on the academic support team for close to 2 years.
This represents a possible biological mechanism, but we still need more research to confirm this. Several studies show an association between severe RSV and recurrent wheezing and asthma later in ...