attitudes for critical thinking in nursing

ANA Nursing Resources Hub

Search Resources Hub

Critical Thinking in Nursing: Tips to Develop the Skill

4 min read • February, 09 2024

Critical thinking in nursing helps caregivers make decisions that lead to optimal patient care. In school, educators and clinical instructors introduced you to critical-thinking examples in nursing. These educators encouraged using learning tools for assessment, diagnosis, planning, implementation, and evaluation.

Nurturing these invaluable skills continues once you begin practicing. Critical thinking is essential to providing quality patient care and should continue to grow throughout your nursing career until it becomes second nature. 

What Is Critical Thinking in Nursing?

Critical thinking in nursing involves identifying a problem, determining the best solution, and implementing an effective method to resolve the issue using clinical decision-making skills.

Reflection comes next. Carefully consider whether your actions led to the right solution or if there may have been a better course of action.

Remember, there's no one-size-fits-all treatment method — you must determine what's best for each patient.

How Is Critical Thinking Important for Nurses? 

As a patient's primary contact, a nurse is typically the first to notice changes in their status. One example of critical thinking in nursing is interpreting these changes with an open mind. Make impartial decisions based on evidence rather than opinions. By applying critical-thinking skills to anticipate and understand your patients' needs, you can positively impact their quality of care and outcomes.

Elements of Critical Thinking in Nursing

To assess situations and make informed decisions, nurses must integrate these specific elements into their practice:

• Clinical judgment. Prioritize a patient's care needs and make adjustments as changes occur. Gather the necessary information and determine what nursing intervention is needed. Keep in mind that there may be multiple options. Use your critical-thinking skills to interpret and understand the importance of test results and the patient’s clinical presentation, including their vital signs. Then prioritize interventions and anticipate potential complications. 
• Patient safety. Recognize deviations from the norm and take action to prevent harm to the patient. Suppose you don't think a change in a patient's medication is appropriate for their treatment. Before giving the medication, question the physician's rationale for the modification to avoid a potential error. 
• Communication and collaboration. Ask relevant questions and actively listen to others while avoiding judgment. Promoting a collaborative environment may lead to improved patient outcomes and interdisciplinary communication. 
• Problem-solving skills. Practicing your problem-solving skills can improve your critical-thinking skills. Analyze the problem, consider alternate solutions, and implement the most appropriate one. Besides assessing patient conditions, you can apply these skills to other challenges, such as staffing issues . 

How to Develop and Apply Critical-Thinking Skills in Nursing

Critical-thinking skills develop as you gain experience and advance in your career. The ability to predict and respond to nursing challenges increases as you expand your knowledge and encounter real-life patient care scenarios outside of what you learned from a textbook. 

Here are five ways to nurture your critical-thinking skills:

• Be a lifelong learner. Continuous learning through educational courses and professional development lets you stay current with evidence-based practice . That knowledge helps you make informed decisions in stressful moments.  
• Practice reflection. Allow time each day to reflect on successes and areas for improvement. This self-awareness can help identify your strengths, weaknesses, and personal biases to guide your decision-making.
• Open your mind. Don't assume you're right. Ask for opinions and consider the viewpoints of other nurses, mentors , and interdisciplinary team members.
• Use critical-thinking tools. Structure your thinking by incorporating nursing process steps or a SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) to organize information, evaluate options, and identify underlying issues.
• Be curious. Challenge assumptions by asking questions to ensure current care methods are valid, relevant, and supported by evidence-based practice .

Critical thinking in nursing is invaluable for safe, effective, patient-centered care. You can successfully navigate challenges in the ever-changing health care environment by continually developing and applying these skills.

Images sourced from Getty Images

Related Resources

Item(s) added to cart

The Value of Critical Thinking in Nursing

• How Nurses Use Critical Thinking
• How to Improve Critical Thinking
• Common Mistakes

Some experts describe a person’s ability to question belief systems, test previously held assumptions, and recognize ambiguity as evidence of critical thinking. Others identify specific skills that demonstrate critical thinking, such as the ability to identify problems and biases, infer and draw conclusions, and determine the relevance of information to a situation.

Nicholas McGowan, BSN, RN, CCRN, has been a critical care nurse for 10 years in neurological trauma nursing and cardiovascular and surgical intensive care. He defines critical thinking as “necessary for problem-solving and decision-making by healthcare providers. It is a process where people use a logical process to gather information and take purposeful action based on their evaluation.”

“This cognitive process is vital for excellent patient outcomes because it requires that nurses make clinical decisions utilizing a variety of different lenses, such as fairness, ethics, and evidence-based practice,” he says.

How Do Nurses Use Critical Thinking?

Successful nurses think beyond their assigned tasks to deliver excellent care for their patients. For example, a nurse might be tasked with changing a wound dressing, delivering medications, and monitoring vital signs during a shift. However, it requires critical thinking skills to understand how a difference in the wound may affect blood pressure and temperature and when those changes may require immediate medical intervention.

Nurses care for many patients during their shifts. Strong critical thinking skills are crucial when juggling various tasks so patient safety and care are not compromised.

Jenna Liphart Rhoads, Ph.D., RN, is a nurse educator with a clinical background in surgical-trauma adult critical care, where critical thinking and action were essential to the safety of her patients. She talks about examples of critical thinking in a healthcare environment, saying:

“Nurses must also critically think to determine which patient to see first, which medications to pass first, and the order in which to organize their day caring for patients. Patient conditions and environments are continually in flux, therefore nurses must constantly be evaluating and re-evaluating information they gather (assess) to keep their patients safe.”

The COVID-19 pandemic created hospital care situations where critical thinking was essential. It was expected of the nurses on the general floor and in intensive care units. Crystal Slaughter is an advanced practice nurse in the intensive care unit (ICU) and a nurse educator. She observed critical thinking throughout the pandemic as she watched intensive care nurses test the boundaries of previously held beliefs and master providing excellent care while preserving resources.

“Nurses are at the patient’s bedside and are often the first ones to detect issues. Then, the nurse needs to gather the appropriate subjective and objective data from the patient in order to frame a concise problem statement or question for the physician or advanced practice provider,” she explains.

Top 5 Ways Nurses Can Improve Critical Thinking Skills

We asked our experts for the top five strategies nurses can use to purposefully improve their critical thinking skills.

Case-Based Approach

Slaughter is a fan of the case-based approach to learning critical thinking skills.

In much the same way a detective would approach a mystery, she mentors her students to ask questions about the situation that help determine the information they have and the information they need. “What is going on? What information am I missing? Can I get that information? What does that information mean for the patient? How quickly do I need to act?”

Consider forming a group and working with a mentor who can guide you through case studies. This provides you with a learner-centered environment in which you can analyze data to reach conclusions and develop communication, analytical, and collaborative skills with your colleagues.

Practice Self-Reflection

Rhoads is an advocate for self-reflection. “Nurses should reflect upon what went well or did not go well in their workday and identify areas of improvement or situations in which they should have reached out for help.” Self-reflection is a form of personal analysis to observe and evaluate situations and how you responded.

This gives you the opportunity to discover mistakes you may have made and to establish new behavior patterns that may help you make better decisions. You likely already do this. For example, after a disagreement or contentious meeting, you may go over the conversation in your head and think about ways you could have responded.

It’s important to go through the decisions you made during your day and determine if you should have gotten more information before acting or if you could have asked better questions.

During self-reflection, you may try thinking about the problem in reverse. This may not give you an immediate answer, but can help you see the situation with fresh eyes and a new perspective. How would the outcome of the day be different if you planned the dressing change in reverse with the assumption you would find a wound infection? How does this information change your plan for the next dressing change?

Develop a Questioning Mind

McGowan has learned that “critical thinking is a self-driven process. It isn’t something that can simply be taught. Rather, it is something that you practice and cultivate with experience. To develop critical thinking skills, you have to be curious and inquisitive.”

To gain critical thinking skills, you must undergo a purposeful process of learning strategies and using them consistently so they become a habit. One of those strategies is developing a questioning mind. Meaningful questions lead to useful answers and are at the core of critical thinking .

However, learning to ask insightful questions is a skill you must develop. Faced with staff and nursing shortages , declining patient conditions, and a rising number of tasks to be completed, it may be difficult to do more than finish the task in front of you. Yet, questions drive active learning and train your brain to see the world differently and take nothing for granted.

It is easier to practice questioning in a non-stressful, quiet environment until it becomes a habit. Then, in the moment when your patient’s care depends on your ability to ask the right questions, you can be ready to rise to the occasion.

Practice Self-Awareness in the Moment

Critical thinking in nursing requires self-awareness and being present in the moment. During a hectic shift, it is easy to lose focus as you struggle to finish every task needed for your patients. Passing medication, changing dressings, and hanging intravenous lines all while trying to assess your patient’s mental and emotional status can affect your focus and how you manage stress as a nurse .

Staying present helps you to be proactive in your thinking and anticipate what might happen, such as bringing extra lubricant for a catheterization or extra gloves for a dressing change.

By staying present, you are also better able to practice active listening. This raises your assessment skills and gives you more information as a basis for your interventions and decisions.

Use a Process

As you are developing critical thinking skills, it can be helpful to use a process. For example:

• Ask questions.
• Gather information.
• Implement a strategy.
• Evaluate the results.
• Consider another point of view.

These are the fundamental steps of the nursing process (assess, diagnose, plan, implement, evaluate). The last step will help you overcome one of the common problems of critical thinking in nursing — personal bias.

Common Critical Thinking Pitfalls in Nursing

Your brain uses a set of processes to make inferences about what’s happening around you. In some cases, your unreliable biases can lead you down the wrong path. McGowan places personal biases at the top of his list of common pitfalls to critical thinking in nursing.

“We all form biases based on our own experiences. However, nurses have to learn to separate their own biases from each patient encounter to avoid making false assumptions that may interfere with their care,” he says. Successful critical thinkers accept they have personal biases and learn to look out for them. Awareness of your biases is the first step to understanding if your personal bias is contributing to the wrong decision.

New nurses may be overwhelmed by the transition from academics to clinical practice, leading to a task-oriented mindset and a common new nurse mistake ; this conflicts with critical thinking skills.

“Consider a patient whose blood pressure is low but who also needs to take a blood pressure medication at a scheduled time. A task-oriented nurse may provide the medication without regard for the patient’s blood pressure because medication administration is a task that must be completed,” Slaughter says. “A nurse employing critical thinking skills would address the low blood pressure, review the patient’s blood pressure history and trends, and potentially call the physician to discuss whether medication should be withheld.”

Fear and pride may also stand in the way of developing critical thinking skills. Your belief system and worldview provide comfort and guidance, but this can impede your judgment when you are faced with an individual whose belief system or cultural practices are not the same as yours. Fear or pride may prevent you from pursuing a line of questioning that would benefit the patient. Nurses with strong critical thinking skills exhibit:

• Learn from their mistakes and the mistakes of other nurses
• Look forward to integrating changes that improve patient care
• Treat each patient interaction as a part of a whole
• Evaluate new events based on past knowledge and adjust decision-making as needed
• Solve problems with their colleagues
• Are self-confident
• Acknowledge biases and seek to ensure these do not impact patient care

An Essential Skill for All Nurses

Critical thinking in nursing protects patient health and contributes to professional development and career advancement. Administrative and clinical nursing leaders are required to have strong critical thinking skills to be successful in their positions.

By using the strategies in this guide during your daily life and in your nursing role, you can intentionally improve your critical thinking abilities and be rewarded with better patient outcomes and potential career advancement.

Frequently Asked Questions About Critical Thinking in Nursing

How are critical thinking skills utilized in nursing practice.

Nursing practice utilizes critical thinking skills to provide the best care for patients. Often, the patient’s cause of pain or health issue is not immediately clear. Nursing professionals need to use their knowledge to determine what might be causing distress, collect vital information, and make quick decisions on how best to handle the situation.

How does nursing school develop critical thinking skills?

Nursing school gives students the knowledge professional nurses use to make important healthcare decisions for their patients. Students learn about diseases, anatomy, and physiology, and how to improve the patient’s overall well-being. Learners also participate in supervised clinical experiences, where they practice using their critical thinking skills to make decisions in professional settings.

Do only nurse managers use critical thinking?

Nurse managers certainly use critical thinking skills in their daily duties. But when working in a health setting, anyone giving care to patients uses their critical thinking skills. Everyone — including licensed practical nurses, registered nurses, and advanced nurse practitioners —needs to flex their critical thinking skills to make potentially life-saving decisions.

Meet Our Contributors

Crystal Slaughter, DNP, APRN, ACNS-BC, CNE

Crystal Slaughter is a core faculty member in Walden University’s RN-to-BSN program. She has worked as an advanced practice registered nurse with an intensivist/pulmonary service to provide care to hospitalized ICU patients and in inpatient palliative care. Slaughter’s clinical interests lie in nursing education and evidence-based practice initiatives to promote improving patient care.

Jenna Liphart Rhoads, Ph.D., RN

Jenna Liphart Rhoads is a nurse educator and freelance author and editor. She earned a BSN from Saint Francis Medical Center College of Nursing and an MS in nursing education from Northern Illinois University. Rhoads earned a Ph.D. in education with a concentration in nursing education from Capella University where she researched the moderation effects of emotional intelligence on the relationship of stress and GPA in military veteran nursing students. Her clinical background includes surgical-trauma adult critical care, interventional radiology procedures, and conscious sedation in adult and pediatric populations.

Nicholas McGowan, BSN, RN, CCRN

Nicholas McGowan is a critical care nurse with 10 years of experience in cardiovascular, surgical intensive care, and neurological trauma nursing. McGowan also has a background in education, leadership, and public speaking. He is an online learner who builds on his foundation of critical care nursing, which he uses directly at the bedside where he still practices. In addition, McGowan hosts an online course at Critical Care Academy where he helps nurses achieve critical care (CCRN) certification.

• Visit Nurse.com on Facebook
• Visit Nurse.com on YouTube
• Visit Nurse.com on Instagram
• Visit Nurse.com on LinkedIn

Nurse.com by Relias . © Relias LLC 2024. All Rights Reserved.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• My Bibliography
• Collections
• Citation manager

Save citation to file

Email citation, add to collections.

• Create a new collection
• Add to an existing collection

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.

• Search in PubMed
• Search in NLM Catalog
• Add to Search

Critical thinking in nursing: an integrated review

Affiliation.

• 1 Summa Health System, Akron, Ohio 44304, USA.
• PMID: 15835580
• DOI: 10.3928/0022-0124-20050301-05

Critical thinking skills are essential to function in today's complex health care environment and to ensure continuing competence for the future. This article provides a review of various definitions and research studies related to critical thinking. Educators and researchers need to clearly define critical thinking, because there has been wide variation in definitions and descriptions of critical thinking. Research studies have shown inconsistent findings, and many have used a one-group pretest-posttest design over a single course or during the length of a nursing program. Studies have not shown an association between critical thinking and competence; rigorous research studies are needed to understand the process of critical thinking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

• Models, measurement, and strategies in developing critical-thinking skills. Brunt BA. Brunt BA. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2005 Nov-Dec;36(6):255-62. doi: 10.3928/0022-0124-20051101-05. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2005. PMID: 16372714 Review.
• Embracing intuition in nursing practice. Smith AJ. Smith AJ. Ala Nurse. 2007 Sep-Nov;34(3):16-7. Ala Nurse. 2007. PMID: 17970294 Review. No abstract available.
• Critical thinking and patient outcomes: a review. Fesler-Birch DM. Fesler-Birch DM. Nurs Outlook. 2005 Mar-Apr;53(2):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2004.11.005. Nurs Outlook. 2005. PMID: 15858523 Review.
• Nursing research: perspectives on critical thinking. Banning M. Banning M. Br J Nurs. 2006 Apr 27-May 10;15(8):458-61. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2006.15.8.20966. Br J Nurs. 2006. PMID: 16723953 Review.
• Exploring critical thinking in critical care nursing education: a pilot study. Rogal SM, Young J. Rogal SM, et al. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2008 Jan;39(1):28-33. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20080101-08. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2008. PMID: 18286928
• Brazilian undergraduate nursing students' critical thinking need to be increased: a cross-sectional study. Nes AAG, Riegel F, Martini JG, Zlamal J, Bresolin P, Mohallem AGDC, Steindal SA. Nes AAG, et al. Rev Bras Enferm. 2022 Nov 28;76(1):e20220315. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0315. eCollection 2022. Rev Bras Enferm. 2022. PMID: 36449978 Free PMC article.
• Simulation-Based Learning Supported by Technology to Enhance Critical Thinking in Nursing Students: Protocol for a Scoping Review. Stenseth HV, Steindal SA, Solberg MT, Ølnes MA, Mohallem A, Sørensen AL, Strandell-Laine C, Olaussen C, Aure CF, Riegel F, Pedersen I, Zlamal J, Martini JG, Bresolin P, Linnerud SCW, Nes AAG. Stenseth HV, et al. JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Apr 4;11(4):e36725. doi: 10.2196/36725. JMIR Res Protoc. 2022. PMID: 35373777 Free PMC article.
• Factors associated with the critical thinking ability of professional nurses: A cross-sectional study. Van Nguyen T, Liu HE. Van Nguyen T, et al. Nurs Open. 2021 Jul;8(4):1970-1980. doi: 10.1002/nop2.875. Epub 2021 Apr 5. Nurs Open. 2021. PMID: 33819376 Free PMC article.
• The Vietnamese version of the nursing critical thinking in clinical practice questionnaire: Translation and psychometric evaluation. Nguyen TV, Liu HE. Nguyen TV, et al. Nurs Open. 2021 Jul;8(4):1840-1847. doi: 10.1002/nop2.834. Epub 2021 Mar 11. Nurs Open. 2021. PMID: 33709511 Free PMC article.
• Critical thinking: concept analysis from the perspective of Rodger's evolutionary method of concept analysis. Carbogim Fda C, Oliveira LB, Püschel VA. Carbogim Fda C, et al. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2016 Sep 1;24:e2785. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.1191.2785. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2016. PMID: 27598376 Free PMC article.

Publication types

• Search in MeSH

LinkOut - more resources

Full text sources.

• Ovid Technologies, Inc.

• Citation Manager

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

We use cookies on our website to support technical features that enhance your user experience, and to help us improve our website. By continuing to use this website, you accept our privacy policy .

• Student Login
• Call Us: 888-549-6755
• 888-559-6763
• Search site Search our site Search Now Close
• Request Info

Skip to Content (Press Enter)

Why Critical Thinking Skills in Nursing Matter (And What You Can Do to Develop Them)

By Hannah Meinke on 07/05/2021

The nursing profession tends to attract those who have natural nurturing abilities, a desire to help others, and a knack for science or anatomy. But there is another important skill that successful nurses share, and it's often overlooked: the ability to think critically.

Identifying a problem, determining the best solution and choosing the most effective method to solve the program are all parts of the critical thinking process. After executing the plan, critical thinkers reflect on the situation to figure out if it was effective and if it could have been done better. As you can see, critical thinking is a transferable skill that can be leveraged in several facets of your life.

But why is it so important for nurses to use? We spoke with several experts to learn why critical thinking skills in nursing are so crucial to the field, the patients and the success of a nurse. Keep reading to learn why and to see how you can improve this skill.

Why are critical thinking skills in nursing important?

You learn all sorts of practical skills in nursing school, like flawlessly dressing a wound, taking vitals like a pro or starting an IV without flinching. But without the ability to think clearly and make rational decisions, those skills alone won’t get you very far—you need to think critically as well.

“Nurses are faced with decision-making situations in patient care, and each decision they make impacts patient outcomes. Nursing critical thinking skills drive the decision-making process and impact the quality of care provided,” says Georgia Vest, DNP, RN and senior dean of nursing at the Rasmussen University School of Nursing.

For example, nurses often have to make triage decisions in the emergency room. With an overflow of patients and limited staff, they must evaluate which patients should be treated first. While they rely on their training to measure vital signs and level of consciousness, they must use critical thinking to analyze the consequences of delaying treatment in each case.

No matter which department they work in, nurses use critical thinking in their everyday routines. When you’re faced with decisions that could ultimately mean life or death, the ability to analyze a situation and come to a solution separates the good nurses from the great ones.

How are critical thinking skills acquired in nursing school?

Nursing school offers a multitude of material to master and upholds high expectations for your performance. But in order to learn in a way that will actually equip you to become an excellent nurse, you have to go beyond just memorizing terms. You need to apply an analytical mindset to understanding course material.

One way for students to begin implementing critical thinking is by applying the nursing process to their line of thought, according to Vest. The process includes five steps: assessment, diagnosis, outcomes/planning, implementation and evaluation.

“One of the fundamental principles for developing critical thinking is the nursing process,” Vest says. “It needs to be a lived experience in the learning environment.”

Nursing students often find that there are multiple correct solutions to a problem. The key to nursing is to select the “the most correct” solution—one that will be the most efficient and best fit for that particular situation. Using the nursing process, students can narrow down their options to select the best one.

When answering questions in class or on exams, challenge yourself to go beyond simply selecting an answer. Start to think about why that answer is correct and what the possible consequences might be. Simply memorizing the material won’t translate well into a real-life nursing setting.

How can you develop your critical thinking skills as a nurse?

As you know, learning doesn’t stop with graduation from nursing school. Good nurses continue to soak up knowledge and continually improve throughout their careers. Likewise, they can continue to build their critical thinking skills in the workplace with each shift.

“To improve your critical thinking, pick the brains of the experienced nurses around you to help you get the mindset,” suggests Eileen Sollars, RN ADN, AAS. Understanding how a seasoned nurse came to a conclusion will provide you with insights you may not have considered and help you develop your own approach.

The chain of command can also help nurses develop critical thinking skills in the workplace.

“Another aid in the development of critical thinking I cannot stress enough is the utilization of the chain of command,” Vest says. “In the chain of command, the nurse always reports up to the nurse manager and down to the patient care aide. Peers and fellow healthcare professionals are not in the chain of command. Clear understanding and proper utilization of the chain of command is essential in the workplace.”

How are critical thinking skills applied in nursing?

“Nurses use critical thinking in every single shift,” Sollars says. “Critical thinking in nursing is a paramount skill necessary in the care of your patients. Nowadays there is more emphasis on machines and technical aspects of nursing, but critical thinking plays an important role. You need it to understand and anticipate changes in your patient's condition.”

As a nurse, you will inevitably encounter a situation in which there are multiple solutions or treatments, and you'll be tasked with determining the solution that will provide the best possible outcome for your patient. You must be able to quickly and confidently assess situations and make the best care decision in each unique scenario. It is in situations like these that your critical thinking skills will direct your decision-making.

Do critical thinking skills matter more for nursing leadership and management positions?

While critical thinking skills are essential at every level of nursing, leadership and management positions require a new level of this ability.

When it comes to managing other nurses, working with hospital administration, and dealing with budgets, schedules or policies, critical thinking can make the difference between a smooth-running or struggling department. At the leadership level, nurses need to see the big picture and understand how each part works together.

A nurse manager , for example, might have to deal with being short-staffed. This could require coaching nurses on how to prioritize their workload, organize their tasks and rely on strategies to keep from burning out. A lead nurse with strong critical thinking skills knows how to fully understand the problem and all its implications.

• How will patient care be affected by having fewer staff?
• What kind of strain will be on the nurses?

Their solutions will take into account all their resources and possible roadblocks.

• What work can be delegated to nursing aids?
• Are there any nurses willing to come in on their day off?
• Are nurses from other departments available to provide coverage?

They’ll weigh the pros and cons of each solution and choose those with the greatest potential.

• Will calling in an off-duty nurse contribute to burnout?
• Was this situation a one-off occurrence or something that could require an additional hire in the long term?

Finally, they will look back on the issue and evaluate what worked and what didn’t. With critical thinking skills like this, a lead nurse can affect their entire staff, patient population and department for the better.

Beyond thinking

You’re now well aware of the importance of critical thinking skills in nursing. Even if you already use critical thinking skills every day, you can still work toward strengthening that skill. The more you practice it, the better you will become and the more naturally it will come to you.

If you’re interested in critical thinking because you’d like to move up in your current nursing job, consider how a Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) could help you develop the necessary leadership skills.

EDITOR’S NOTE: This article was originally published in July 2012. It has since been updated to include information relevant to 2021.

• Share on Facebook
• Share on Twitter
• Share on Pinterest
• Share on LinkedIn

Request More Information

Talk with an admissions advisor today.

Fill out the form to receive information about:

• Program Details and Applying for Classes
• Financial Aid (for those who qualify)
• Customized Support Services
• Detailed Program Plans

There are some errors in the form. Please correct the errors and submit again.

Please enter your first name.

Please enter your last name.

There is an error in email. Make sure your answer has:

• An "@" symbol
• A suffix such as ".com", ".edu", etc.

There is an error in phone number. Make sure your answer has:

• 10 digits with no dashes or spaces
• No country code (e.g. "1" for USA)

There is an error in ZIP code. Make sure your answer has only 5 digits.

We offer tuition savings for many employers—see if yours is one of them.

Please enter Corporate Employer.

Can’t find your employer? Select "Other Employer Not In List" or "Not Employed".

Please choose a School of study.

Please choose a program.

Please choose a degree.

The program you have selected is not available in your ZIP code. Please select another program or contact an Admissions Advisor (877.530.9600) for help.

The program you have selected requires a nursing license. Please select another program or contact an Admissions Advisor (877.530.9600) for help.

Rasmussen University is not enrolling students in your state at this time.

By selecting "Submit," I authorize Rasmussen University to contact me by email, phone or text message at the number provided. There is no obligation to enroll. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

About the author

Hannah Meinke

Posted in General Nursing

• nursing education

Related Content

Brianna Flavin | 05.07.2024

Brianna Flavin | 03.19.2024

Robbie Gould | 11.14.2023

Noelle Hartt | 11.09.2023

This piece of ad content was created by Rasmussen University to support its educational programs. Rasmussen University may not prepare students for all positions featured within this content. Please visit www.rasmussen.edu/degrees for a list of programs offered. External links provided on rasmussen.edu are for reference only. Rasmussen University does not guarantee, approve, control, or specifically endorse the information or products available on websites linked to, and is not endorsed by website owners, authors and/or organizations referenced. Rasmussen University is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission, an institutional accreditation agency recognized by the U.S. Department of Education.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• v.7(2); 2020 Mar

Critical thinking skills of nursing students: Observations of classroom instructional activities

Christian makafui boso.

1 Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town South Africa

2 School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health and Allied Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast Ghana

Anita S. van der Merwe

Janet gross.

3 Peace Corps Liberia, Mother Patern College of Health Sciences, Stella Maris Polytechnic, Monrovia Liberia

Critical thinking (CT) is vital for nursing practice. Nursing schools should provide learning experiences that enable nursing students to acquire CT skills. Yet, these authors are not aware of any study that has directly observed instructional activities related to CT skills acquisition in the classroom environment. The aim of this study was to explore instructional activities in the classroom environment in relation to acquisition of CT skills of students.

Qualitative non‐participant observation.

Using a purposive sampling, 10 classroom teaching sessions were observed and mediating factors of CT skills acquisition of students noted. Data were analysed thematically. Data were collected from October–December 2017. 

Three key themes of instructional activities relating to acquisition of CT skills of students emerged, namely educators’ behaviour, students’ characteristics and university‐wide factors/administrative support. Class sizes ranged from 34–162 students with an average of 95.

1. INTRODUCTION

The ever‐changing and complex healthcare environment requires that nurses acquire critical thinking (CT) skills to meet the complex challenges of the environment (Von Colln‐Appling & Giuliano, 2017 ). Nurses should be able to select and use data for effective clinical judgements to promote good health outcomes (Nelson, 2017 ; Von Colln‐Appling & Giuliano, 2017 ). Consequently, nursing schools must offer learning experiences that assist students to think critically about complex issues instead of just merely becoming receptacles for information (Toofany, 2008 ; Von Colln‐Appling & Giuliano, 2017 ). It is the duty of nurse educators to help students to acquire CT skills (Nelson, 2017 ; Von Colln‐Appling & Giuliano, 2017 ).

Attempts have been made to conceptualize CT to guide the facilitation of CT skills of students. Worth noting are Dwyer, Hogan, and Stewart ( 2014 ) and Duron, Limbach, and Waugh’s ( 2006 ) frameworks, which could be relevant in the classroom setting. Focusing on learning outcomes, Dwyer et al. ( 2014 ) posited that long‐term memory and comprehension are foundational processes for CT application. The framework incorporates both reflective judgement and self‐regulatory functions of metacognition as a requirement for CT. Self‐regulation refers to an individual's ability, willingness and the perceived need to think critically when solving specific problems. Therefore, factors that influence the interrelationship between short‐term and long‐term memory (the bedrock of CT), comprehension, reflective judgement and self‐regulation functions of metacognition will influence CT skills of the students. On the other, Duron et al.’s model focused on practical instructional activities needed to guide students in acquiring CT skills. The five‐step framework requires that educators: (a) determine learning objectives; (b) teach through questioning; (c) practice before assessing; (d) review, refine and improve; and (e) provide feedback and assessment of learning.

Nursing literature is replete with studies demonstrating that adopting appropriate teaching methods/strategies, such as active learning, improves the CT scores of students. Examples of such approaches include problem‐based learning (Jones, 2008 ; Jun, Lee, Park, Chang, & Kim, 2013 ), concept mapping (Wheeler & Collins, 2003 ) and simulation (Sullivan‐Mann, Perron, & Fellner, 2009 ). Furthermore, based on a systematic review, Chan ( 2013 ) suggested three strategies to facilitate CT skills of nursing students, which include appropriate questioning strategy, reflective writing on learning experiences and discussion of case study.

The classroom environment provides a vital opportunity for educators to create the necessary milieu to encourage students to develop their CT skills. It is therefore required that negative factors to the development of CT are minimized or removed and those factors that enhance the development of CT skills are accentuated. However, these factors that influence CT have received less attention in nursing education (Raymond, Profetto‐McGrath, Myrick, & Strean, 2018 ). Furthermore, no direct observations have been made to identify specific factors influencing CT in the classroom setting.

Studies such as those of Mangena and Chabeli ( 2005 ) and Shell ( 2001 ) assessed factors that inhibit CT acquisition of nursing students. Mangena and Chabeli's study focused on educators and students’ perspectives. They found that educators’ lack of knowledge of CT teaching methods and evaluation, negative attitudes of educators, student selection and educational background, socialization, culture and language inhibited the development of CT skills of students. Shell also found negative student factors, demand to cover content and time constraints both on class time and on educators’ development that hindered CT skills development of students.

Raymond and Profetto‐McGrath ( 2005 ) also identified internal and external factors of educators that had an impact on their CT. These factors included physical and mental well‐being, the view of leadership on CT and collegial relationships that existed in the educators’ environment. Similarly, Raymond et al. ( 2018 ) identified personal (elements/conditions originating from the educator), interpersonal (elements originating from the student–educator relationship) and broader environmental factors (conditions evident in the larger physical setting or political milieu) that influenced educators’ CT and influenced their abilities to role model CT skills.

The above authors focused on factors influencing CT from different perspectives. Shell ( 2001 ) and Mangena and Chabeli ( 2005 ) focused on barriers to student development of CT. Also, Shell examined educators’ perspectives. Mangena and Chabeli examined both educators’ and students’ views. Raymond and Profetto‐McGrath ( 2005 ) and Raymond et al. ( 2018 ) specifically focused on nurse educators' CT skills. None of the above studies directly observed classroom teaching though similar factors were identified.

2. BACKGROUND

The “greatest healthcare resource is the healthcare personnel, of which nurses are a primary component” (Talley, 2006 , p. 50). However, limited resources in nursing schools especially in developing countries where this study was undertaken (Talley, 2006 ) impede the experiences required for the students to develop CT skills. For example, studies have identified lack of qualified educators (Bell, Rominski, Bam, Donkor, & Lori, 2013 ; Salifu, Gross, Salifu, & Ninnoni, 2018 ) as well as infrastructural and logistical constraints (Talley, 2006 ), large class sizes and absenteeism (Wilmot, Kumfo, Danso‐Mensah, & Antwi‐Danso, 2013 ) as some of the challenges affecting nursing education. These challenges have led to the dominance of inappropriate teaching approaches (Boso & Gross, 2015 ; Wilmot et al., 2013 ).

Similarly, studies regarding CT have reported the negative influence of sociocultural norms such as the seniority tradition (Chan, 2013 ; Jenkins, 2011 ; Kawashima, 2003 ; Mangena & Chabeli, 2005 ). In such cultures, students are not encouraged to speak out openly (Chan, 2013 ). For example, an individual is not expected to disagree nor question an authority figure in public. In the context of this study, the seniority tradition could have been manifested in the classroom where the faculty is regarded as an authority whose ideas may be seen as sacrosanct by students. These authors argue that it is necessary to identify the factors through direct observation that might hinder or enhance the facilitation of CT of students in the classroom setting. Notwithstanding, the authors of this paper had not found any publication in the nursing literature where direct observation for CT teaching methods/strategies had been carried out in the classroom setting. Therefore, this study explored factors that might influence students’ ability to memorize and comprehend content towards CT skills acquisition. Also, educators’ instructional activities that either enhanced or inhibited students’ CT facilitation in the classroom context were explored.

3. THE AIM OF THE STUDY

The aim of this study was to explore instructional activities towards the development of CT skills of students in a classroom environment. This study was part of a larger research project aimed at developing a CT‐based curriculum framework of students.

4. RESEARCH DESIGN

Qualitative non‐participant observation design was used. This design was to allow for the observation of first‐hand (Patton, 2015 ) and unusual aspects (Creswell & Creswell, 2018 ) real‐time classroom practices whilst being present. Also, qualitative observation has been noted as a primary means of understanding the experiences of users (Reddacliff, 2017 ).

5.1. Setting

The study was conducted in classroom settings of an undergraduate nursing programme in a public university in Ghana. As a school in a developing country, there are constraints such as logistical inadequacies and lack of adequate qualified faculty, which could inhibit meaningful learning experience towards CT skills development of students existed. The classes are scheduled based on the demands of the various departments of the university. The university runs several programmes, and each programme is allocated with venues as demanded.

5.2. Sampling

Through a purposive method ten (10) teaching sessions from class levels 200 to 400 were observed from October to December 2017. Educators who had lectures within the period were approached face‐to‐face. Ten out of 16 educators agreed to participate. They provided informed consent. The 10 sessions provided rich data to be able to deduce current practices of instruction as occurring in the classroom environment. The main selection criterion was a full teaching session (1–3 hr) of B.Sc. nursing undergraduate programme taught by an educator in the selected nursing school.

5.3. Data collection and instrumentation

Data were collected between October and December 2017. The observations were from five level 200, three level 300 and two level 400 classes; six medical–surgical, one maternal health, one biomedical and two nursing fundamental/theoretical courses were taught. Two individuals—first author and an assistant, consistent with Winter and Munn‐Giddings’ ( 2001 ) recommendation for observation, observed the teaching sessions. A six‐item semi‐structured observation guide/protocol using Billing and Halstead's ( 2005 ) six steps of designing learning experiences for developing CT skills was employed for data collection. Billing and Halstead's six steps of designing experiences for developing CT skills were consistent with identifying factors that enhance or inhibit memory, comprehension, reflective judgement and instruction identical to Dwyer et al. ( 2014 ) and Duron et al.’s ( 2006 ) frameworks. The protocol was pre‐tested in a classroom at an analogous nursing school. Though the sixth step of Billing and Halstead's ( 2005 ) six steps of designing learning experiences for developing CT skills proposes both summative and formative assessments, in the context of this observation, only formative assessment methods used by the educators could be observed.

Billing and Halstead's six steps of designing experiences for developing CT skills are as follows. Step 1 involved determining the learning outcome for the specific class. These learning objectives should be explicitly clear to students and fit for purpose. Step 2 involved creating an anticipatory set. The educator's strategies that generate students’ interest in content, encourage their participation and create collegial environment for students were observed. Step 3 consisted of selecting teaching and learning strategies. Observation focused on identifying active learning methods of teaching against passive teaching methods. Also, whether the educator or students dominated the class was explored. Whether the nurse educator combined different teaching methods/strategies were explored. Step 4 considered implementation issues. Class size, involvement of students, classroom arrangement, use of teaching aids and materials and instructional media were observed. Step 5 involved the observation of how the learning experience was closed. This included how the educator summarized the lesson and related lessons to next class period. Step 6 involved how students’ learning experiences were evaluated. The educator's strategies for the assessment and evaluation of student learning experience during class period were observed.

The observers positioned themselves at the back of the classrooms throughout each period of teaching. Participants did not appear distracted or uncomfortable during the periods of observation. Thoughts and feeling of the observers relative to observed situations were captured as field notes. In order not to distract and cause discomfort to participants, the observers took minimal notes and expanded them immediately after the observations. Transcripts from the observations were compared and agreed on by the two observers. Differences were resolved through discussion. Also, the educators whose teaching sessions were observed were asked to provide feedback and revision made based on educators' comment(s). This was to minimize observers’ bias.

5.4. Data analysis

Bryman's ( 2010 ) four stages of qualitative analysis as described by Gibbs ( 2010 ) were used to analyse the data. The first author and an assistant described each observation. Later, the first author read the transcript at least four times to enable a meaningful content analysis. Data were coded, and themes and sub‐themes were derived. Subsequently, the second and third authors who are the supervisors of this research project cross‐checked the themes and sub‐themes with the observational transcripts for validation.

5.5. Ethical consideration

This study was approved as one part of a doctoral project by the Health Research Ethics Committee of Stellenbosch University (Ref. no S17/05/106) and the university where the study was done. Permission was also sought from the dean of the selected school. The first author visited the students at their various classrooms to explain the nature and purpose of the study to them. Likewise, the nurse educators were provided with information on the purpose and nature of the study. They were provided individually with informed consent forms for signing before data were collected. They were assured of their rights to opt out at any stage of the study. Confidentiality and anonymity were also assured. Individual participants were not identified with the data (during data collection, analysis and reporting).

Three overall themes were deduced from the classroom observation data, namely educators’ behaviour, students’ behaviour and university‐wide factors/administrative support. These themes related to the Dwyer et al. ( 2014 ) and Duron et al.’s ( 2006 ) frameworks of CT development. To reiterate, these factors could either enhance or inhibit memory (foundation of CT development), comprehension, reflective judgement and self‐regulatory functions of metacognition as a requirement for CT.

6.1. Theme I: Educators’ classroom behaviour

Educators’ behaviour includes actions and inactions of the educators that might either enhance or inhibit students’ positive learning experiences towards the acquisition of CT skills. Four sub‐themes under this theme were identified namely beginning and ending on time; creating a conducive and participatory environment; and teaching methods and styles and managing the class.

6.1.1. Subtheme A: Beginning and ending on time

Only one (observation 6) started on time. The lecturer was in the class before scheduled time waiting for students. However, nine of the classes started late. The lateness ranged from 10 min (observations 2 and 7) to 44 min (observation 3). In one case (observation 5), the lecturer was on time but students were not available because they were moving immediately from another lecture. In other words, the ending time from the other lecture overlapped with the starting time of the new lecture. In another case (observation 8), the lecturer was engaged in an analogous official duty and therefore reported late.

6.1.2. Subtheme B: Creating a conducive and participatory environment

Some attitudes demonstrated by the educators appeared to have encouraged collegiality. For example, one lecturer's statement, "no answer is wrong, it could only be a right answer to a different question" (observation 2) caused students to participate in the teaching/learning process, which is consistent with CT teaching strategies. Also, some lecturers demonstrated a good sense of humour that was appreciated by students. For example, in observation 3, the lecturer asked a question and after the question, jokingly said, "my question to those in spectacles", which generated laughter from the students. The same lecturer appeared receptive to students’ views—allowed students to disagree with his views and even thanked students for asking questions. These strategies also demonstrated modelling of open‐mindedness (an attribute of CT) on part of the educators.

Active participation in the teaching and learning process is required to facilitate CT skills of students. However, some actions taken by some lecturers appeared to have resulted in students not fully participating in the learning process. For example, students appeared tense or nervous after the lecturer made the statements that "they [students] must respect and not make offensive statements; some of you are still adolescents. You must respect, I have always told you" (observation 8). This statement was in reaction to a comment from a student that the lecturer found to be offensive.

6.1.3. Subtheme C: Teaching methods and styles

The most frequent teaching method used was student presentation. In one case (observation 6), students were given case studies from which they were requested to draw a plan of care. However, students themselves used lectures whilst presenting. General discussions followed students' presentations led by the lecturer. The presentation encouraged students to share their views freely. However, during student presentations, several students appeared disinterested and were passive in the process. Some presenters just read from the power point slides verbatim. In cases where lecturers taught, they often used the lecture method interspersed with periods of questions and answers (observations 2, 3, 4 and 8).

In one lecture (observation 3), the lecturer related lessons to real life situations (stories from the clinical settings) that appeared to have sustained the interest of the students. The lecturer also frequently moved up and down the aisles during the class session. These actions appeared to have caused students to be more attentive (which enhances memory) throughout the session.

6.1.4. Subtheme D: Managing the class

Management of the class appeared to be challenging to some lecturers. For example, in observation 10, the lecturer did not act even when students were engaged in distractive behaviours. Most students generally appeared interested in the lesson. However, several students appeared indifferent with what was happening, and some conversed throughout the session (observation 10).

6.2. Theme II Students' characteristics

Students’ characteristics refer to actions and inactions of the students during observations that might either enhance or inhibit students’ positive learning experiences towards the acquisition of CT skills. Two sub‐themes under this theme were identified, namely distractive student behaviour and punctuality.

6.2.1. Subtheme A: Distractive student behaviour

Attention/perception processing is needed to enhance short‐term memory, which leads to long‐term memory (Dwyer et al., 2014 ). In all classes observed, several students were engaged in distractive behaviours that might hinder memory, namely fidgeting with phones, beeping/ringing phones, petty chatting and whispering—especially those sitting at the back roll of the class. However, what appeared to be the source of most distractive behaviour—the mobile phone—was useful in helping students in some of the presentations. Students sitting in front appeared more attentive. Movement of lecturers up and down the aisles appeared to limit distractive behaviours.

6.2.2. Subtheme B: Punctuality

Students arrived to lectures late. For example, during observation 2, approximately 70 students were late, with some more than 1 hr late. Also, another class session began with 62 students and ended with 117 (about 55 students late). In another instance, at a pre‐scheduled time, only 29 students were present. One student came after about 1 hr 21 min (observation 5), whilst some students left before the classes concluded.

6.3. Theme III: University‐wide factors/administrative support

University‐wide factors/administrative support relate to administrative factors in the university or school that might either enhance or inhibit students’ positive learning experiences towards the acquisition of CT skills. Three sub‐themes under this theme were identified: class size; scheduling of classes; and classroom layout and equipment.

6.3.1. Subtheme A: Class size

Class sizes observed for the 10 sessions ranged from 34–162 with an average of 95 students. Most classes (7) were above 90 students.

6.3.2. Subtheme B: Scheduling of classes

Some students who were to have a lecture immediately after the session were packed at the entrance to the lecture hall whilst engaging in conversation apparently causing distraction (observation 4). Also, some lectures started immediately after a lecture had ended with no time to move from one lecture hall to another.

6.3.3. Subtheme C: Classroom layout and equipment

Classrooms’ arrangements/layouts are rectangular with desks and chair bolted down. Most ceiling mounted projectors in classrooms were dysfunctional forcing lecturers to use movable projectors which were placed too close to screens. This made power point font sizes small. Some screens were torn and dirty making projected content unclear (observation 3). Also, some public address systems were dysfunctional, and therefore, some students could not hear the lecturers. For example, during a lecture (observation 4) on three different occasions, students drew the attention of the lecturer to the fact that they could not hear him. At a point, rain stopped the lecture because students could not hear the lecturer.

7. DISCUSSION

Based on the observation of classroom environment in relation to instructional activities, several factors need to be considered to provide students with the desired learning experiences to the development of their CT skills. Educators’ positive behaviour which served as factors towards the enhancement of CT skills of students identified in this study is worth noting. These factors including educators’ good sense of humour and open‐mindedness appeared to inspire students to engage in the teaching–learning process were encouraging. The learning and learning process were also made entertaining. This finding is consistent with Ulloth's ( 2002 ) study which found humour to be useful in holding students’ attention, relieving anxiety, establishing rapport and making learning fun. Froneman, Du Plessis, and Koen's ( 2016 ) study on student–educator relationship identified similar characteristics needed for meaningful learning experiences of students. Similarly, other studies (Mangena & Chabeli, 2005 ; Raymond & Profetto‐McGrath, 2005 ; Raymond et al., 2018 ) buttress the need for nurse educators to create a conducive environment for students to develop CT skills.

Another finding worth highlighting in this study was negative educators’ factors such as being unfriendly in correcting students, using inappropriate teaching methods and poor class management skills. Similar factors were identified among educators in South Africa (Mangena & Chabeli, 2005 ) and Canada (Raymond & Profetto‐McGrath, 2005 ; Raymond et al., 2018 ). Mangena and Chabeli ( 2005 ) found that educators’ lack of knowledge, inappropriate teaching and assessment methods and educators’ negative attitude as barriers to the facilitation of CT skills of students.

A further noteworthy finding is the inappropriate implementation of CT teaching methods by educators. Notably, the incongruous implementation of students’ presentation and discussion methods need to be highlighted. This finding is similar to Boso and Gross' ( 2015 ) study among nurse educators in Ghana and inappropriate teaching and assessment methods identified in Mangena and Chabeli’s ( 2005 ) study.

Students’ lateness to lectures (lack of punctuality) identified in this study is worth highlighting. This finding indicates loss of valuable time which may be needed to engage with the content which may hinder the development of students’ CT skills. Also, students’ lateness to lectures appears to correspond with educators’ own late start to lectures. This appears to agree with Jack, Hamshire and Chambers' ( 2017 ) findings which highlight the influence of educator's behaviour on students. This is similar to Cruess, Cruess, and Steinert ( 2008 ) and Billings and Halstead's ( 2005 ) assertions about role modelling.

Another important finding of this study was students’ distractive behaviour. Some students engaging in distractive behaviours are not unexpected, but the degree and extent of these distractive behaviours were unanticipated. Shell ( 2001 ) identified students’ behaviour as the highest barrier to the development of CT skills of students. Also, this finding may be indicative of nurse educators’ apparent lack of appropriate classroom management skills required for meaningful learning experience of students. For example, as seen in this study, educator's movements up and down the aisles aided in the minimization of distractive behaviours of students.

The use of mobile phone during class time as an example of distractive behaviours is worth highlighting. These students may have been engaged on social media platforms such as WhatsApp, Facebook and Twitter during class sessions underscoring the penetration of social media into every facet of the students’ lives. The risk of the use of technology or social media has been noted (Ferguson, 2013 ). Inappropriate use of social media by students found in this study may highlight the absence of social media guidelines for students and educators. Peck ( 2014 ) suggests a purposeful use of social media to improve learning. Schools of higher learning have used social media to improve connectedness, increase access to academic libraries, create virtual classrooms and create student learning experiences to achieve desired academic outcomes (Peck, 2014 ). Evidence supports increased knowledge and flexibility of learning when technology is introduced into the classroom such as blended‐learning (Strickland, Gray, & Hill, 2012 ) and flipped‐classroom (Missildine, Fountain, Summers, & Gosselin, 2013 ) approaches. A purposeful use of social media should reflect the availability of social media guidelines/policy, which will likely minimize the risk or abuse of social media use.

Large class sizes were observed in this study. Pressure to increase student intake appears to overwhelm the school's capacity in terms of space and the number of qualified nurse educators at post (Bell et al., 2013 ; Hornsby, Osman, & Matos‐Ala, 2013 ). This is similar to Raymond and Profetto‐McGrath, ( 2005 ) and Raymond et al.’s ( 2018 ) studies that highlight environmental factors that influence facilitation of CT in a school. The large class sizes appear to influence teaching methods/strategies (Hornsby et al., 2013 ) that could be adopted by educators as identified in Gibbs, Lucas, and Spouse's ( 1997 ) study.

Another finding of this study was scheduling of classes. Classes were sometimes beginning immediately after another for the same students. This was partly accounting for late arrival of students to the next class. The late arrival of students to class may reduce their contact hours and may influence the introduction of the appropriate learning methods/strategies. Given that found time as a factor in CT development of students, reduced contact hours could inhibit the facilitation of CT of the students.

Issues relating to classroom features were observed in this study. These findings primarily relate to logistical and design issues. Logistical issues included dysfunctional ceiling mounted projectors, torn/dirty screens and inadequate public address systems. These logistical constraints may impede meaningful learning experience and consequently hinder the development of CT skills acquisition of students. This finding is consistent with other reports on challenges in the Ghanaian nursing educational system (Bell et al., 2013 ; Talley, 2006 ; Wilmot et al.,  2013 ). The traditional rectangular classroom physical layouts with desks and chairs bolted down is inconsistent with CT skills tenets which require that physical features of classrooms involve small or large circle arrangements to allow for students to make eye contact with each other and the educator to facilitate open dialogue (Billings & Halstead, 2005 ).

8. LIMITATIONS

Given that this was a direct non‐participatory observational study, some observations might have been missed by the researchers (Creswell & Poth, 2018 ; Patton, 2015 ), especially when an attempt to minimize interruption of the teaching process, the observers of this observational study positioned themselves at the back of the classroom throughout each session. Also, there could have been observer bias. As noted by Creswell and Poth, there could have been impression management and potential deception on the part of the participants, especially the educators which might have influenced the data obtained. Several observations (10) were purposefully conducted to minimize this potential Hawthorne effect. In addition, some accounts might have been misinterpreted. However, this was minimized to some extent by reviewing the accounts with participants involved in the study.

9. RECOMMENDATION

Based on this study, further studies are recommended. The exploration of the experiences of nursing students and educators of instructional practices towards the development of CT skills in Ghana is highly recommended. Both quantitative and qualitative studies on how social media or technology in general could be used to facilitate meaningful learning are recommended.

This study also has implications for nurse educators and nursing school authorities who need to create a conducive environment for students for CT skills of students. Nurse educators should examine their own instructional methods/strategies with the view to adopting appropriate CT methods. In this regard, educators should aim at making learning fun and enjoyable. Educators should see themselves as role models to students regarding the demonstration of CT skills. School authorities should institute continuous faculty development programmes to help educators update their teaching skills regarding CT skills of students. School managers should provide the needed logistics needed for meaningful learning and commensurate to learning space, available faculty and other resources.

10. CONCLUSIONS

This study sought to observe instructional practices that influence the acquisition of CT skills of students in a classroom environment. The findings suggest that the educators’ teaching strategies have influence on learning atmosphere for CT skills facilitation of students. Also, several inhibiting and enhancing factors relating to students, university‐wide/administrative support were identified. It is therefore important that inhibiting factors are minimized or removed and enhancing factors are maintained or accentuated to help students engage in meaningful and purposeful learning experience with the view of developing their CT skills. Particularly, the role of the educators must be stressed to ensure that a conducive and participatory environment is created for student learning.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

We do not have any conflict of interest to report.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

CMB, ASVDM and JG: Conceptualization and designing of the study. CMB: Data collection, analysing and drafting of the manuscript. ASVDM and JG: Study supervision and made critical revisions on the paper. All the authors made substantial contributions to the manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We wish to acknowledge Victor Angbah for assisting in data collection. We also express our gratitude to the study participants.

Boso CM, van der Merwe AS, Gross J. Critical thinking skills of nursing students: Observations of classroom instructional activities . Nursing Open . 2020; 7 :581–588. 10.1002/nop2.426 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]

• Bell, S. A. , Rominski, S. , Bam, V. , Donkor, E. , & Lori, J. (2013). Analysis of nursing education in Ghana: Priorities for scaling‐up the nursing workforce . Nursing and Health Sciences , 15 ( 2 ), 244–249. 10.1111/nhs.12026 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Billings, D. M. , & Halstead, J. A. (2005). Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty , 2nd ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Inc. [ Google Scholar ]
• Boso, C. M. , & Gross, J. J. (2015). Nurse educators’ perceptions of critical thinking in developing countries: Ghana as a case study . Advances in Medical Education and Practice , 6 , 555–560. 10.2147/AMEP.S88942 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chan, Z. C. Y. (2013). A systematic review of critical thinking in nursing education . Nurse Education Today , 33 ( 3 ), 236–240. 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.01.007 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Creswell, J. W. , & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc. [ Google Scholar ]
• Creswell, J. W. , & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.. [ Google Scholar ]
• Cruess, S. R. , Cruess, R. L. , & Steinert, Y. (2008). Teaching rounds: Role modelling - Making the most of a powerful teaching strategy . Bmj , 336 ( 7646 ), 718–721. 10.1136/bmj.39503.757847.BE [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Duron, R. , Limbach, B. , & Waugh, W. (2006). Critical thinking framework for any discipline . Interrnational Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education , 17 ( 2 ), 160–166. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dwyer, C. P. , Hogan, M. J. , & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century . Thinking Skills and Creativity , 12 , 43–52. 10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ferguson, C. (2013). It’s time for the nursing profession to leverage social media . Journal of Advanced Nursing , 69 , 745–747. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1725032933?accountxml:id=10382%255Cnhttp://link.library.curtin.edu.au/openurl??url_ver=Z39.88-2004%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal%26genre=article%26sxml:id=ProQ:ProQ:healthcompleteshell%26atitle=Adapting+a+Social+Media+Strateg . 10.1111/jan.12036 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Froneman, K. D. , Plessis, E. , & Koen, M. P. (2016). Effective educator‐student relationships in nursing education to strengthen nursing students’ resilience . Curationis , 39 ( 1 ), 1–9. 10.4102/curationis.v39i1.1595 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Gibbs, G. , Lucas, L. , & Spouse, J. (1997). The effects of class size and form of assessment on nursing students’ performance, approaches to study and course perceptions . Nurse Education Today , 17 ( 4 ), 311–318. 10.1016/S0260-6917(97)80062-7 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Gibbs, R. G. (2010). Coding part 1: Alan Bryman’s 4 stages of qualitative analysis [Web Video] . p. 20613008. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7X7VuQxPfpk%26feature=list_other%26playnext=1%26list=SP14E49EDF20613008 [ Google Scholar ]
• Hornsby, D. J. , Osman, R. , & Matos‐Ala, J. D. . (2013). Large‐class pedagogy: Interdisciplinary perspectives for quality higher education (1st ed.). Stellenbosch, South Africa: SUN MeDIA MeTRO; Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en%26lr=%26xml:id=KpT3AwAAQBAJ%26pgis=1%255Cnhttp://www.africansunmedia.co.za/Portals/0/files/extracts/LargeClassPedagogyextract.pdf%255Cnhttp://www.sajs.co.za/sites/default/files/publications/pdf/Boughey_BookReview.pdf%255Cnwww.africansun [ Google Scholar ]
• Jack, K. , Hamshire, C. , & Chambers, A. (2017). The influence of role models in undergraduate nurse education . Journal of Clinical Nursing , 26 ( 23–24 ), 4707–4715. 10.1111/jocn.13822 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Jenkins, S. D. (2011). Cross-cultural perspectives on critical thinking . Journal of Nursing Education , 50 ( 5 ), 268–274. 10.3928/01484834-20110228-02. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Jones, M. (2008). An evaluation of problem-based learning in an Associate Degree Program . Nursing Education Perspectives , 29 ( 5 ), 278–284. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Jun, W. H. , Lee, E. J. , Park, H. J. , Chang, A. K. , & Kim, M. J. (2013). Use of the 5E Learning Cycle Model combined with problem-based learning for a fundamentals of nursing course . Journal of Nursing Education , 52 ( 12 ), 681–689. 10.3928/01484834-20131121-03. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kawashima, A. (2003). Critical thinking integration into nursing education and practice in Japan: Views on its reception from foreign-trained Japanese nursing educators . Contemporary Nurse , 15 ( 3 ), 199–209. 10.5172/conu.15.3.199 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mangena, A. , & Chabeli, M. M. (2005). Strategies to overcome obstacles in the facilitation of critical thinking in nursing education . Nurse Education Today , 25 ( 4 ), 291–298. 10.1016/j.nedt.2005.01.012 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Missildine, K. , Fountain, R. , Summers, L. , & Gosselin, K. (2013). Flipping the classroom to improve student performance and satisfaction . Journal of Nursing Education , 52 ( 10 ), 597–599. 10.3928/01484834-20130919-03 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Nelson, A. E. (2017). Methods faculty use to facilitate nursing students’ critical thinking . Teaching and Learning in Nursing , 12 ( 1 ), 62–66. 10.1016/j.teln.2016.09.007 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc. [ Google Scholar ]
• Peck, J. L. (2014). Social media in nursing education: Responsible integration for meaningful use . Journal of Nursing Education , 53 ( 3 ), 164–169. 10.3928/01484834-20140219-03 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Raymond, C. L. , & Profetto‐McGrath, J. (2005). Nurse educators’ critical thinking: Reflection and measurement . Nurse Education in Practice , 5 , 209–217. 10.1016/j.nepr.2004.10.004 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Raymond, C. , Profetto‐McGrath, J. , Myrick, F. , & Strean, W. B. (2018). Balancing the seen and unseen: Nurse educator as role model for critical thinking . Nurse Education in Practice , 31 ( January ), 41–47. 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.04.010 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Reddacliff, A. (2017). If Margaret Mead was a librarian: Observation and visitor experience at libraries in Rrussia and the Baltic states . Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association , 66 ( 1 ), 17–27. 10.1080/00049670.2017.1283739 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Salifu, D. A. , Gross, J. , Salifu, M. A. , & Ninnoni, J. P. K. (2018). Experiences and perceptions of the theory‐practice gap in nursing in a resource‐constrained setting: A qualitative description study . Nursing Open , 6 , 72–83. 10.1002/nop2.188 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Shell, R. (2001). Perceived barriers to teaching for critical thinking by nursing faculty . Nursing and Health Care Perspectives , 22 ( 6 ), 286–291. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/nlnjournal/ [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Strickland, K. , Gray, C. , & Hill, G. (2012). The use of podcasts to enhance research‐teaching linkages in undergraduate nursing students . Nurse Education in Practice , 12 ( 4 ), 210–214. 10.1016/j.nepr.2012.01.006 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sullivan-Mann, J. , Perron, C. A. , & Fellner, A. N. (2009). The effects of simulation on nursing students’ critical thinking scores: A quantitative study . Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews , 9 ( 2 ), 111–116. 10.1053/j.nainr.2009.03.006 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Talley, B. (2006). Nurses and nursing education in Ghana: Creating collaborative opportunities . International Nursing Review , 53 ( 1 ), 47–51. 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2006.00431.x [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Toofany, S. (2008). Critical thinking among nurses: Concept mapping can help both newly registered staff and nursing students develop the critical thinking skills they lack . Nursing Management (Harrow) , 14 , 28–31. 10.7748/nm2008.02.14.9.28.c6344 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ulloth, J. K. (2002). The benefits of humor in nursing education . The Journal of Nursing Education , 41 ( 11 ), 476–481. 10.3928/0148-4834-20021101-06 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Von Colln‐Appling, C. , & Giuliano, D. (2017). A concept analysis of critical thinking: A guide for nurse educators . Nurse Education Today , 49 , 106–109. 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.007 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wheeler, L. A. , & Collins, S. K. R. (2003). The influence of concept Mapping on critical thinking in baccalaureate nursing students . Journal of Professional Nursing , 19 ( 6 ), 339–346. 10.1016/S8755-7223(03)00134-0 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wilmot, E. M. , Kumfo, J. , Danso-Mensah, D. , & Antwi-Danso, S. (2013). An Investigation into the factors that contribute to nurse/midwife trainees’ poor performance in the final licencing examination in Ghana . Nursing and Midwifery Council: Accra. [ Google Scholar ]
• Winter, R. , & Munn-Giddings, C. (2001). A handbook for PAR in health and social care . London: Routledge. [ Google Scholar ]

Clinical Reasoning In Nursing (Explained W/ Example)

Last updated on August 19th, 2023

In this article, we will cover:

What is Clinical Reasoning?

Definition of clinical reasoning in nursing.

• What is the concept of clinical reasoning?

Why is Clinical Reasoning Important in Nursing?

What are the types of clinical reasoning, what are the three elements of clinical reasoning, what are the steps of clinical reasoning, what is the importance of clinical reasoning and judgement in nursing, what is the difference between critical thinking and clinical reasoning, clinical reasoning in nursing example.

Clinical reasoning refers to the cognitive process that healthcare professionals, such as doctors, nurses, and other clinicians, use to analyze and make decisions about a patient’s condition and appropriate treatment.

It’s a complex and dynamic process that involves gathering and interpreting information from various sources, including patient history, physical examinations, laboratory tests, imaging studies, and the clinician’s own experience and knowledge.

Medicine, physical therapy, and occupational therapy were the first to introduce clinical reasoning to the healthcare disciplines. Since then, the nursing profession has used these strategies to improve patient care.

What is Clinical Reasoning in Nursing?

Clinical reasoning in nursing is dynamic and adaptive, as nurses continuously gather new information and adjust care plans based on patient responses.

It’s a crucial skill that guides nurses in providing safe, effective, and patient-centered care. Clinical reasoning involves the integration of clinical knowledge, critical thinking , and experience to address the complex and dynamic nature of patient situations.

It involves balancing medical knowledge with critical thinking , empathy, and ethical considerations to provide comprehensive and compassionate patient care.

Clinical reasoning in nursing refers to the cognitive process that nurses use to collect and assess patient information, analyze data, make informed judgments, and develop appropriate care plans.

What is the Concept of Clinical Reasoning?

Clinical reasoning is the cognitive process used by healthcare professionals to make informed decisions regarding patient care.

It encompasses tasks such as collecting information, analyzing data, identifying patterns, generating hypotheses, and making judgments for diagnosis and treatment.

Clinical reasoning blends science and intuition in medical practice. It combines evidence-based knowledge with experience-derived judgment to attain accurate diagnoses and treatments while addressing uncertainties.

As an essential component of clinical practice, clinical reasoning guides healthcare providers in delivering safe and effective patient care.

Clinical reasoning is important in nursing for several reasons. Some reasons are listed below.

Patient-Centered Care:

Clinical reasoning helps nurses tailor care plans to individual patients, considering their unique needs, preferences, and circumstances, leading to more personalized and effective care.

Safe and Effective Care:

It ensures that nurses make well-informed decisions based on thorough assessments, reducing the risk of errors and promoting patient safety.

Optimal Outcomes:

Through clinical reasoning, nurses can identify early signs of complications, make timely interventions, and contribute to better patient outcomes.

Nurtured Critical Thinking:

Clinical reasoning cultivates nurses’ critical thinking abilities, empowering them to dissect complex situations, appraise evidence, and make rational choices.

Efficient Resource Utilization:

It helps nurses prioritize care tasks, allocate resources effectively, and manage time efficiently, enhancing workflow and patient care delivery.

Evidence-Based Practice:

Nursing practice is constantly evolving with new research and evidence. Clinical reasoning involves integrating the latest evidence-based knowledge into decision-making, ensuring that care plans are aligned with the best available practices.

Complex Cases:

Nurses often encounter intricate patient cases; clinical reasoning equips them to navigate complexity, address multiple issues, and make comprehensive care plans.

Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

Effective clinical reasoning supports collaboration with other healthcare professionals, promoting well-rounded patient care.

Adaptation to Change:

In rapidly changing healthcare environments, clinical reasoning enables nurses to adapt to new information, technologies, and practices.

Critical Decision-Making:

Nurses face complex situations where quick and accurate decisions are critical. Clinical reasoning equips them with the ability to analyze data, identify patterns, and generate hypotheses. This enables nurses to make informed decisions about interventions, medications, and treatments, leading to effective care.

Early Detection and Prevention:

Through clinical reasoning, nurses can detect subtle changes in a patient’s condition that might signal complications or deterioration. This allows for early interventions, preventing potential health crises and improving patient prognosis.

Error Reduction:

Clinical reasoning encourages systematic thinking, reducing the likelihood of errors in administering medications, performing procedures, and assessing patients. This promotes patient safety and prevents adverse events.

Holistic Care:

Patient’s health is influenced by various factors beyond just medical conditions. Clinical reasoning enables nurses to consider the social, emotional, and psychological aspects of patients, promoting holistic care and overall well-being.

Ethical Dilemmas:

Nursing often involves ethical challenges. Clinical reasoning guides nurses in making ethically sound decisions by considering patients’ autonomy, values, and cultural beliefs.

Communication and Collaboration:

Clinical reasoning enhances nurses’ ability to communicate effectively with patients, families, and other healthcare professionals. It fosters collaboration by enabling nurses to articulate their assessments, interventions, and rationales clearly.

Professional Growth:

Developing strong clinical reasoning skills enhances nurses’ professional growth. It increases their confidence, competence, and ability to take on more complex patient cases and leadership roles.

In summary , clinical reasoning is an important component of nursing practice, allowing nurses to provide safe, effective, and patient-centered care.

It enables nurses to make informed decisions, improve patient outcomes, and navigate the dynamic and complex healthcare setting.

Clinical reasoning involves three key elements that healthcare professionals integrate to make informed decisions about patient care:

1. Patient Information:

This element encompasses all the relevant data about the patient’s medical history, current condition, symptoms, physical examination findings, diagnostic test results, and social and contextual factors.

Gathering comprehensive and accurate patient information is essential for forming an accurate understanding of the patient’s health status and needs.

2. Clinical Knowledge and Expertise:

Healthcare professionals draw upon their extensive medical knowledge, clinical experience, and expertise to interpret patient information.

This knowledge includes an understanding of anatomy, physiology, pathophysiology, pharmacology, and medical guidelines.

Clinical expertise is built over years of practice, exposure to a variety of cases, and ongoing learning.

3. Critical Thinking and Decision-Making Skills:

Critical thinking involves the analytical and logical thought processes that healthcare professionals use to evaluate patient information in the context of their clinical knowledge.

It includes the ability to identify patterns, assess potential diagnoses, consider alternative explanations, and weigh the pros and cons of different treatment options.

Effective decision-making is the outcome of critical thinking , as healthcare professionals choose the most appropriate course of action based on the available information.

These three elements are interdependent and work together to form the foundation of clinical reasoning.

Healthcare professionals integrate patient information with their clinical knowledge and expertise while applying critical thinking skills to reach accurate diagnoses, develop effective treatment plans, and provide high-quality patient care.

The balance between these elements varies based on the complexity of the clinical situation and the healthcare provider’s level of experience and expertise.

8 Stages of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle

Clinical reasoning involves several key steps:

1. Data Collection: Gathering relevant information about the patient’s medical history, symptoms, physical examination findings, and any diagnostic tests that have been conducted.

2. Pattern Recognition: Recognizing patterns and relationships in the collected data to identify potential diagnoses or issues. This involves comparing the patient’s presentation to previous cases and medical knowledge.

3. Hypothesis Generation: Formulating hypotheses or possible explanations for the patient’s condition based on the patterns and information observed. This step often involves generating a list of potential diagnoses that fit the available evidence.

4. Differential Diagnosis: Narrowing down the list of potential diagnoses by considering the likelihood of each condition and ruling out less likely options. This is where critical thinking and medical knowledge come into play.

5. Testing and Validation: Ordering further diagnostic tests or investigations to confirm or rule out specific diagnoses. This could include blood tests, imaging studies, biopsies, or other procedures.

6. Synthesis: Integrating the results of diagnostic tests and additional information to refine the diagnosis and treatment plan. This may involve adjusting the initial hypotheses based on new data.

7. Treatment Planning: Developing a comprehensive treatment plan that addresses the diagnosed condition, the patient’s unique circumstances, preferences, and any potential risks or benefits of various treatment options.

8. Monitoring and Adaptation: Continuously monitoring the patient’s progress and adjusting the treatment plan as needed based on how the patient responds and any new information that emerges.

Clinical reasoning requires a deep understanding of medical science, anatomy, physiology, and pathology, as well as the ability to apply this knowledge to real-world clinical scenarios.

It also involves critical thinking skills , logical reasoning, and the ability to handle uncertainty, as medical situations can be complex and patients may present with atypical symptoms.

Overall, clinical reasoning is a crucial skill for healthcare professionals, as it forms the foundation for making accurate diagnoses and providing effective patient care.

Clinical reasoning and judgment are of paramount importance in nursing for several reasons:

• Accurate Diagnosis and Treatment: Effective clinical reasoning enables nurses to accurately assess patients’ conditions, identify potential problems, and make informed decisions about appropriate interventions and treatments. Accurate diagnosis and treatment are crucial for improving patient outcomes and preventing complications.
• Patient Safety: Sound clinical judgment helps nurses recognize potential risks and make timely interventions to ensure patient safety. By identifying early signs of deterioration or complications, nurses can take appropriate actions to prevent adverse events.
• Individualized Care: Clinical reasoning allows nurses to tailor care plans to each patient’s unique needs, preferences, and circumstances. This patient-centered approach improves patient satisfaction and contributes to better treatment outcomes.
• Early Detection of Changes: Nurses often spend the most time with patients, which puts them in a prime position to notice subtle changes in a patient’s condition. Strong clinical reasoning skills enable nurses to detect these changes early and respond appropriately.
• Effective Communication: Nurses with strong clinical reasoning skills can communicate more effectively with patients, families, and interdisciplinary healthcare teams. They can convey complex medical information, treatment plans, and concerns in a clear and organized manner.
• Ethical Decision-Making: Clinical reasoning includes ethical considerations in decision-making. Nurses must weigh the ethical implications of their actions and decisions, especially when faced with complex situations that involve moral dilemmas.
• Resource Utilization: Effective clinical reasoning helps nurses allocate resources efficiently. By accurately assessing patient needs and prioritizing care, nurses can optimize the use of time, personnel, and equipment.
• Adaptation to Change: Healthcare is dynamic, and patients’ conditions can change rapidly. Nurses with strong clinical reasoning skills can adapt quickly to changing situations, making necessary adjustments to care plans and interventions.
• Continuity of Care: Nurses often play a critical role in ensuring continuity of care as patients transition between different healthcare settings. Effective clinical reasoning facilitates clear communication of patient information and ensures a smooth transition of care.
• Professional Growth: Developing clinical reasoning and judgment skills enhances a nurse’s professional growth. These skills are transferrable and applicable across various healthcare settings, allowing nurses to provide high-quality care regardless of the environment.
• Confidence and Job Satisfaction: Nurses who feel confident in their clinical reasoning abilities experience greater job satisfaction. Confidence comes from knowing that decisions are based on a solid foundation of knowledge, experience, and critical thinking.
• Advocacy: Nurses with strong clinical reasoning skills can effectively advocate for their patients, ensuring that their needs are met, their voices are heard, and their rights are respected within the healthcare system.
• Quality Improvement: Clinical reasoning plays a role in quality improvement efforts by identifying areas for improvement in patient care processes and outcomes.

In summary, clinical reasoning and judgment are essential for nurses to provide safe, effective, and patient-centered care.

These skills underpin the entire nursing process, enabling nurses to make informed decisions, communicate effectively, and positively impact patient outcomes and experiences.

Critical Thinking :

Critical thinking is a cognitive process that involves analyzing, evaluating, and synthesizing information, ideas, and arguments to make reasoned judgments and decisions.

It is a broader skill applicable to various aspects of life and professions, encouraging logical, evidence-based thinking and minimizing biases.

Critical thinking aims to enhance problem-solving, decision-making, and analytical abilities in a wide range of contexts beyond healthcare.

Clinical Reasoning:

Clinical reasoning, on the other hand, is a specialized form of critical thinking that is primarily focused on healthcare and clinical situations.

It specifically pertains to the cognitive process healthcare professionals, especially nurses and doctors, use to collect, assess, analyze, and apply information to make informed clinical judgments and decisions.

Clinical reasoning is crucial for providing safe and effective patient care, as it integrates medical knowledge, patient assessments, ethical considerations, and treatment planning.

Critical Thinking vs. Clinical Reasoning

Clinical reasoning can be categorized into different types or approaches. Each of which represents a particular way of thinking and making decisions in clinical practice.

Some of the commonly recognized types of clinical reasoning include:

• Deductive Reasoning: This type of reasoning starts with a general principle or theory and applies it to a specific case. Healthcare professionals use deductive reasoning to make predictions or decisions based on established medical knowledge. For example, if a patient presents with a set of symptoms consistent with a well-known disease, the clinician may deduce that the patient likely has that disease.
• Inductive Reasoning: In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning involves making generalizations or conclusions based on specific observations or cases. Clinicians use inductive reasoning to form hypotheses or theories from individual patient experiences. For instance, a nurse may notice a pattern of symptoms in several patients and develop a hypothesis about a potential new condition.
• Abductive Reasoning: Abductive reasoning combines elements of both deductive and inductive reasoning. It involves making educated guesses or hypotheses to explain observations or data that don’t fit neatly into established patterns. Clinicians use abductive reasoning when they encounter cases that don’t seem to fit existing diagnoses or models, and they generate plausible explanations to guide further investigation.
• Analytical Reasoning: This type of reasoning involves systematically breaking down a complex situation or problem into smaller parts to understand its components and relationships. Healthcare professionals use analytical reasoning to dissect complex patient cases, focusing on details and relationships to arrive at a diagnosis or treatment plan.
• Intuitive Reasoning: Intuitive reasoning relies on a healthcare professional’s experience, intuition, and gut feeling. It involves drawing on one’s own clinical experience and recognizing patterns that may not be immediately apparent. Intuitive reasoning is often employed in situations where rapid decision-making is necessary.
• Procedural Reasoning: Procedural reasoning focuses on the steps or processes needed to manage a clinical situation. It involves thinking about the sequence of actions required to address a patient’s needs. For example, a nurse may use procedural reasoning when administering medications, performing wound care, or carrying out other routine clinical procedures.
• Narrative Reasoning: Narrative reasoning involves considering the patient’s story, values, and context as essential components of clinical decision-making. It emphasizes understanding the patient’s perspective and tailoring care plans to the individual’s unique circumstances.
• Hypothetico-Deductive Reasoning: This approach involves generating and testing hypotheses systematically to arrive at a diagnosis. Healthcare professionals consider various possible diagnoses, then order specific tests to confirm or rule out each hypothesis.
• Pattern Recognition Reasoning: This type of reasoning relies on recognizing familiar patterns based on clinical experience and knowledge. Healthcare providers quickly identify common clinical presentations and apply established treatment protocols.

Emily Davis, a 68-year-old woman, is admitted to the medical unit with a diagnosis of Acute Exacerbation of COPD. She has a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and has been experiencing increased shortness of breath, cough, and decreased oxygen saturation levels.

How does your understanding of nursing fundamentals influence your clinical reasoning?

Nursing Action:

• Reflect on the nursing care provided to patients with COPD and respiratory distress.

• Review the pharmacologic treatments that will improve the patient’s COPD.

• Reflect the non-pharmacologic measures that will help to improve the patient’s respiratory distress.

• Determine the most appropriate assessments and interventions for managing respiratory distress in patients with COPD.

Implementation of Interventions:

• Assess Emily’s respiratory rate, depth, and effort, as well as oxygen saturation levels.

• Administer prescribed bronchodilators, and nebulization to improve airway patency.

• Elevate the head of the bed to promote better lung expansion.

• Encourage deep breathing exercises and effective coughing techniques.

• Consult with the physician to determine pharmacologic therapy

• Monitor Emily’s response to interventions and adjust care as needed. How does your understanding of pathophysiology guide your clinical reasoning?

• Knowledge of COPD’s pathophysiology helps anticipate complications and tailor interventions.

In this scenario, the nurse’s grasp of nursing fundamentals enables them to provide appropriate care for a patient with COPD.

By considering the patient’s history and symptoms, the nurse takes action to manage respiratory distress.

Implementing interventions such as bronchodilators and elevation of the head of the bed aligns with nursing knowledge.

Additionally, understanding the pathophysiology of COPD aids in predicting potential complications and choosing interventions to support the patient’s respiratory function.

• What is Critical Thinking in Nursing? (Explained W/ Examples)
• How To Improve Critical Thinking Skills In Nursing? 24 Strategies With Examples
• What Are Socratic Questions?
• What is the “5 Whys” Technique?
• 15 Attitudes of Critical Thinking in Nursing (Explained W/ Examples)

Clinical reasoning in nursing involves the skillful integration of medical knowledge, critical thinking , and patient assessment to make informed decisions about patient care.

It enables nurses to provide safe, effective, and patient-centered interventions while considering individual needs and complex healthcare situations.

Comments are closed.

Medical & Legal Disclaimer

All the contents on this site are for entertainment, informational, educational, and example purposes ONLY. These contents are not intended to be used as a substitute for professional medical advice or practice guidelines. However, we aim to publish precise and current information. By using any content on this website, you agree never to hold us legally liable for damages, harm, loss, or misinformation. Read the  privacy policy  and  terms and conditions.

Privacy Policy

Terms & Conditions

© 2024 nurseship.com. All rights reserved.

Solutions ∨

Learning and Performance → ∨

Mandatory Training Issue required courses and monitor compliance ∨

Continuing Education Offer clinicians training to meet license requirements ∨

Professional Development Engage staff and empower career growth ∨

Clinical Development Enhance skills with clinician-built content ∨

Certification Review Build knowledge and increase exam pass rates ∨

Competency Management Measure and evaluate knowledge, skills, and abilities ∨

Obstetrics Solution Reduce variation in care with data-driven learning ∨

Onboarding Solution Tailor nurse training and reduce turnover ∨

Recruiting and Staffing → ∨

Talent Acquisition Advertising Target your recruitment to our 3M+ nurse community ∨

Validated Assessments Gauge job fit with clinical, behavioral, situational assessments ∨

Nurse Job Board Post your nurse opportunities on Nurse.com ∨

Compliance Management → ∨

Compliance Software Meet requirements with easy to administer package ∨

View All Solutions → ∨

Who We Serve ∨

Who We Serve → ∨

Hospitals and Health Systems Large multisite systems, critical-access hospitals, staffing agencies ∨

Individual Healthcare Workers Physicians, nurses, clinicians, and allied health professionals ∨

Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Skilled nursing facilities, continuing care retirement communities and life plan communities, assisted living facilities, rehab therapy providers, and hospice agencies ∨

Behavioral and Community Health Behavioral health, intellectual and developmental disabilities, applied behavior analysis, community health centers, and children, youth, and family-serving organizations ∨

Home Health and Home Care Home health and home care agencies and organizations ∨

Government Organizations Federal, state, and local entities ∨

Case Studies ∨

PAM Health Supports Business Growth, Employee Engagement, and Better Patient Outcomes With Relias PAM Health utilized Relias to make post-acquisition employee onboarding easier and to influence positive patient outcomes through high-quality staff training and coaching. ∨

CSIG Depends on the Relias Platform Through Change and Growth Before 2020, Common Sail Investment Group (CSIG) conducted all its senior living staff training and education in person in different locations. ∨

Why Relias ∨

Why Relias → ∨

Technology Engage learners and ease burden for administrators ∨

Measurable Outcomes Improve workforce, organization, and patient results ∨

Services Reduce administrative burden with professional solutions ∨

Expert Content Trust Relias for quality, award-winning courses and tools ∨

Community Tap into clinician resources and peer support ∨

Resources → ∨

How Mental Health and Social Determinants Are Driving Maternal Mortality The CDC has uncovered another dimension affecting the already alarming problem of maternal mortality in the U.S… ∨

2023 DSP Survey Report The 2023 DSP Survey Report highlights feedback from 763 direct support professionals (DSPs) across the country on job satisfaction, supervision… ∨

Resources ∨

Resource Center → ∨

Blog Keep up with industry trends and insights ∨

Articles and Reports Review recently published thought leadership ∨

Success Stories Read about Relias clients improving outcomes ∨

Events Find Relias at an upcoming industry conference ∨

Webinars Register for upcoming key topic discussions ∨

Support Contact us for help with your account ∨

Podcast Explore conversations with healthcare experts ∨

Upcoming Event ∨

Wild on Wounds Conference 2024 Wild on Wounds (WOW) is the third largest wound care conference in the nation, focused on advancing our healthcare workforce with impactful hands-on wound care education built by and for clinicians. ∨

Contact Sales → ∨

About Relias → ∨

Careers View our open positions ∨

Media Review our latest news and make press inquiries ∨

Alliances and Partnerships Scan our industry connections and relationships ∨

Awards Check out our latest recognitions ∨

Diversity Learn more about Relias’ commitment to DEIB ∨

In the News → ∨

Relias Named to Top 10 of Top 100 Healthcare Tech Companies of 2023 Relias announced that it has been named number 10 among the Top 100 Healthcare Technology Companies of 2023 chosen by The Healthcare Technology Report. ∨

Login Portals ∨

Relias Learning ∨

Nurse.com ∨

Relias Academy ∨

Wound Care Education Institute ∨

Relias Media ∨

Need help logging in?

Article Review: Nurse Onboarding Can Improve Critical Thinking, Knowledge, and Satisfaction

By Felicia Sadler, MJ, BSN, RN, CPHQ, LSSBB , on February 3, 2022

Recently published in the Journal for Nurses in Professional Development , Onboarding New Graduate Nurses Using Assessment-Driven Personalized Learning to Improve Knowledge, Critical Thinking, and Nurse Satisfaction aimed to demonstrate how an evidence-based onboarding program can provide the most support possible to new graduate nurses as they transition from the classroom to practice.

The study compared two cohorts, one onboarded using an assessment-driven personalized learning plan, demonstrating:

• 8% improvement in communication
• 8% improvement in critical thinking
• Increased scores in all 5 medical-surgical assessment domains
• Improvement in 16 out of 24 nurse satisfaction scores (compared to only 7 out of 24 improved scores in traditional onboarding cohort)

Effective Nurse Onboarding

Healthcare leaders agree that effective onboarding is key to new nurse success, but often struggle to provide evidence-based support for specific onboarding programs.

However, healthcare organizations will benefit from measuring both the efficiency and effectiveness of an onboarding program. As leaders continue to focus on improving quality of care , improving the patient experience, and reducing readmissions, healthcare organizations find an even greater need for an effective onboarding process to ensure nurses are prepared to care for complex patient populations.

As noted in the study, traditional nursing onboarding programs have focused on technical skills and organization-specific policies and procedures. Although all of these are necessary for safe and effective care, they are not sufficient to meet the demands of today’s higher acuity, complex care environment. Higher acuity and more complex care require a higher level of critical thinking , knowledge, and clinical reasoning regarding disease process and evidence-based research and data to identify where opportunities for improvement exist or even the effectiveness of their process.

A Personalized Approach

It’s no surprise that new nurses will enter an organization with varied levels of knowledge and experiences. If nurse educators provide every nurse with the same information, some nurses may become bored and unengaged (if they’ve already mastered the information being taught), whereas other nurses who need more information may feel lost and left behind.

Nurse onboarding should be personalized to the new nurse in order to keep them engaged. As presented in the study, assessment driven, personalized learning is one important component to ensure knowledge gaps are identified and addressed. This lays the groundwork for a personalized learning approach that respects what the learner already knows.

Nurse Onboarding Study Overview

This study evaluated two cohorts, tracking their onboarding approaches. Compared to a traditional onboarding cohort, one cohort was onboarded using the Relias Onboarding assessment-driven personalized learning plan. The study compared critical thinking, knowledge, and nurse satisfaction between cohorts before and after personalized learning for onboarding.

As outlined in the article, this study showed that areas impacted by the personalized learning for onboarding, including relevant knowledge domains and critical thinking, were higher among nurses who participated in the personalized learning compared to nurses who were hired before the personalized learning was implemented.

For the measure of nurse satisfaction, the onboarding cohort showed improvement on 16 of 24 nurse experience questions between baseline and 12 months later, compared with the pre-onboarding cohort, which only showed improvement on 7 of the 24 nurse experience questions.

Research has demonstrated that effective onboarding programs show higher nurse satisfaction and higher competencies as well as lower turnover and lower stress levels. This suggests that this assessment-driven personalized learning is effective as it demonstrated higher nurse satisfaction and improvements in both knowledge and critical thinking compared to other cohorts.

Role of Relias

An efficient and effective onboarding program clearly demonstrates to new nurses that their healthcare organization is committed in their personal success and is willing to invest in them both personally and professionally.

Relias Onboarding was the assessment-driven personalized learning plan used to quantify the nurses’ clinical knowledge and judgment. This personalized learning component addresses ineffective orientation, by tailoring education to meet each individual nurse’s needs. An initial assessment identifies knowledge gaps for each nurse and then provides learning that addresses those gaps.

Additionally, preceptors can use the information from the assessment to identify which areas new nurses may need more or less support in order to help each nurse become safe, effective, and ready for independent practice.

Felicia Sadler, MJ, BSN, RN, CPHQ, LSSBB

Vice President, Quality, Relias

Share This Article

Onboarding New Graduate Nurses Using Assessment-Driven Personalized Learning to Improve Knowledge, Critical Thinking, and Nurse Satisfaction

As published in the Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, this study demonstrated how effective onboarding improved knowledge, critical thinking, and nurse satisfaction.

Related Resources

15 behavioral interview questions for nurses.

7 min read | Posted February 6, 2024

Learn 15 behavioral interview questions for nurses to identify candidates with the right characteristics and skills for success and retention.

Nursing Shortage Solutions Are Happening — Because They Must

6 min read | Posted June 2, 2023

Healthcare organizations need nursing shortage solutions to overcome serious workforce challenges that threaten the nurses who remain.

Article Review and Discussion: Determining Best Fit for Newly Licensed Nurses

4 min read | Posted February 2, 2022

A recent study showed how nurses hired into a higher job fit demonstrated a reduction in orientation time.

Connect with Us

to find out more about our training and resources

Get Started